0e279fe489 walletdb: Remove unused static functions from walletdb.h (Andrew Chow)
9f536d4fe9 wallettool: Have RecoverDatabaseFile return errors and warnings (Andrew Chow)
06e263a4e3 Call RecoverDatabaseFile directly from wallettool (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Followup to #19324 addressing some comments.
Removes the `SalvageWallet` function in wallettool and instead directly calls `RecoverDatabaseFile` as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19324#discussion_r450379596
Removes the `LogPrintf`s and `tfm::format`s in `RecoverDatabaseFile` as noted in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19324#discussion_r448027237
Removes the declarations of `VerifyEnvironment` and `VerifyDatabaseFile` that were forgotten in `walletdb.h` as noted in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19324#issuecomment-654389079
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 0e279fe489
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 0e279fe489, just dropped last commit
Tree-SHA512: ffd01f30536c2eab4bf40ba363c3ea916ecef3c8f0c5262040b40498776ffb00f95240204a40e38415d6931800851d0a3fa63ee91efc1d329b60ac317da0363d
e7448d6680 wallet: Don't override signing errors (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
While reviewing #17204 I noticed that the errors in `input_errors` from `::SignTransaction` where being overridden by `CWallet::SignTransaction`. For example, a Script related error led to incomplete signature data which led to `CWallet::SignTransaction` reporting that keys were missing, which was a less precise error than the original one.
Additionally, the error `"Input not found or already spent"` is [duplicated in `sign.cpp`](c7b4968552/src/script/sign.cpp (L481)), so the error here is redundant at the moment. So technically the whole error block could be removed, I think. However, this code is affected by the ongoing work on the wallet so there might be a reason why these errors are here. But even if there is a reason to keep them, I don't think existing, potentially more precise errors should be overridden here unless we want to hide them from the users. I am looking for feedback if this is a work in progress state where these errors could be more useful in the future or if they can be removed.
On testing: even though [the errors in `CWallet` are covered](https://marcofalke.github.io/btc_cov/total.coverage/src/wallet/wallet.cpp.gcov.html), all tests still pass after removing them. I am not sure if there is a desire to cover these specific error messages, tests in `test/functional/rpc_signrawtransaction.py` seem to aim for a more generic approach.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e7448d6680
meshcollider:
Code review ACK e7448d6680
Tree-SHA512: 3e2bc11d05379d2aef87b093a383d1b044787efc70e35955b2f8ecd028b6acef02f386180566af6a1a63193635f5d685466e2f6141c96326c49ffc5c81ca3e23
f110b7c722 rpc: document returned error fields as optional if applicable (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The following RPCs return error fields (named `"error"` or `"errors"`) that are optional, but don't show up as optional in the help text yet:
* `analyzepsbt`
* `estimatesmartfee`
* `signrawtransactionwithkey`
* `signrawtransactionwithwallet`
The following RPC has the errors field already marked as optional, but doesn't match the usual format in the description (like `"if there are any"` in parantheses):
* `estimaterawfee`
This PR adds the missing optional flags and adapts the description strings. Inspired by a recent PR #19634 by justinmoon.
The instances were found via `git grep "RPCResult.*\"error"`. Note that there is one RPC so far where the return error is not optional (i.e. in case of no error, the field is included in the result, but is just empty), namely `bumpfee`.
ACKs for top commit:
adaminsky:
ACK `f110b7c`
laanwj:
ACK f110b7c722, new documentation looks consistent with actual behavior
achow101:
ACK f110b7c722
meshcollider:
utACK f110b7c722
Tree-SHA512: 30c00f78a575b60e32b4536496af986d53a25f33e6ebbf553adcdcf825ad21a44f90267f3d1ea53326dac83bcfa9983fdb3dad6d3126e20f97f3c08ce286e188
c133cdcdc3 Cap listsinceblock target_confirmations param (Adam Stein)
Pull request description:
This addresses an issue brought up in #19587.
Currently, the `target_confirmations` parameter to `listsinceblock` is not checked for being too large. When `target_confirmations` is greater than one more than the current number of blocks, `listsinceblock` fails with error code -1. In comparison, when `target_confirmations` is less than 1, a -8 "Invalid parameter" error code is thrown.
This PR fixes the issue by returning a -8 "Invalid parameter" error if the `target_confirmations` value corresponds to a block with more confirmations than the genesis block. This happens if `target_confirmations` exceeds one more than the number of blocks.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK c133cdcdc3
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK c133cdcdc3. Just suggested changes since last review. Thanks!
Tree-SHA512: 02680f4cb937d2c24d5019abd0ebfa188b8a50679a1e64e9c26bfe5c17eef6aea906832e6e2d492ba8a2ea160041bf185d66795ee691e340f6793db03c21b89a
79d6332e9e moveonly: Fix indentation in bumpfee RPC (Andrew Chow)
431071c28a Hide bumpfee's psbt creation behavior behind -deprecatedrpc (Andrew Chow)
4638224f64 Add psbtbumpfee RPC (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Adds a new RPC `psbtbumpfee` which always creates a psbt. `bumpfee` will then only be able to create and broadcast fee bumping transactions instead of changing its behavior based on `IsWalletSet(WALLET_FLAG_DISABLE_PRIVATE_KEYS)`.
Split from #18627
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 79d6332
meshcollider:
utACK 79d6332e9e
fjahr:
Code review ACK 79d6332e9e
Tree-SHA512: 1c92c4b4461bb30e78be3ee73165f624398ef33996ce36043b61a8931be667030d0fca12fd0b30097b78c56e4e9092c69582b237cbdac51d56f6be23d8c0f1bb
Previously, listsinceblock would fail with error code -1 when the
target_confirmations exceeded the number of confirmations of the genesis
block. This commit allows target_confirmations to refer to a lastblock
hash with more confirmations than exist in the chain by setting the
lastblock hash to the genesis hash in this case. This allows for
`listsinceblock "" 6` to not fail if the block count is less than 5
which may happen on regtest.
Includes update to the functional test for listsinceblock to test for
this case.
0a8aa626dd refactor: Make HexStr take a span (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Make `HexSt`r take a span of bytes, instead of an awkward pair of templated iterators. This simplifies most of the uses.
ACKs for top commit:
elichai:
Code review ACK 0a8aa626dd
hebasto:
re-ACK 0a8aa626dd
jonatack:
re-ACK 0a8aa626dd
Tree-SHA512: 6e178ece5cbac62119c857a10299b1e85422938084c3f03063e17119a5129e0c28016e05a6fabaa4c271a7e0a37c7cd89fa47c435ee19b38a5acfe80d00de992
f916847d2b rpc: Document getwalletinfo's unlocked_until field as optional (Justin Moon)
Pull request description:
The `getwalletinfo` RPC command's `unlocked_until` field is [optional in the code](f916847d2b/src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp (L2397)), but wasn't marked as optional in the docs.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK f916847d2b
achow101:
ACK f916847d2b
kristapsk:
ACK f916847d2b
Tree-SHA512: 8d82f0992fdaf8160000acf4a6e7e7f9ff289a90a983be2e078cf754f4b03601637e5f405afa66bd55adef9b347fa5eac5cc1822033b2ac08c587609cf3dfe0f
Affects the following RPCs:
- analyzepsbt
- estimatesmartfee
- signrawtransactionwithkey
- signrawtransactionwithwallet
For the RPC estimaterawfee, the description message was adapted
to match the other optional ones.
8ed9002cd1 refactor: use local argsmanager in CRegTestParams (Ivan Metlushko)
9b20f66828 scripted-diff: Replace gArgs with local argsman (Ivan Metlushko)
a316e9ce26 refactor: add unused ArgsManager to replace gArgs (Ivan Metlushko)
Pull request description:
Rationale: reduce use of gArgs to decouple code and simplify future maintenance and easier unit testing.
This PR is continuation of work started in #18926 and #18662
It covers only places that register args in ArgsManager with `AddArgs()` or `AddHiddenArgs()`.
Closes#19511
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 8ed9002cd1👛
Tree-SHA512: 7e6ba8e8357a48833c71e9c3942a769acb3d93bdcc6748a8ef2b7c4461a2499419b60896abf1d8b6bf8e88ee2590284cdd5da64220243ac22375300bcb8fe3e8
Previously having no database handle could still be considered a success
when BerkeleyDatabase and BerkeleyBatch were used for dummy database
things. With dedicated DummyDatabase and DummyBatch classes now, these
should fail.
d416ae560e walletdb: Introduce WalletDatabase abstract class (Andrew Chow)
2179dbcbcd walletdb: Add BerkeleyDatabase::Open dummy function (Andrew Chow)
71d28e7cdc walletdb: Introduce AddRef and RemoveRef functions (Andrew Chow)
27b2766384 walletdb: Move BerkeleyDatabase::Flush(true) to Close() (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
A `WalletDatabase` abstract class is created from `BerkeleyDatabase` and is implemented by `BerkeleyDatabase`. First, to get to the point that this is possible, 4 functions need to be added to `BerkeleyDatabase`: `AddRef`, `RemoveRef`, `Open`, and `Close`.
First the increment and decrement of `mapFileUseCount` is refactored into separate functions `AddRef` and `RemoveRef`.
`Open` is introduced as a dummy function. This will raise an exception so that it always fails.
`Close` is refactored from `Flush`. The `shutdown` argument in `Flush` is removed and instead `Flush(true)` is now the `Close` function.
Split from #18971
Requires #19325
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK d416ae560e. Only changes since last review were rebasing after base PR #19334 merge, and adding cs_db lock in BerkeleyDatabase destructor, which should avoid races accessing env->m_databases and env->m_fileids
fjahr:
Code review ACK d416ae560e
meshcollider:
Code review & test run ACK d416ae560e
Tree-SHA512: 98d05ec093d7446c4488e2b0914584222a331e9a2f4d5be6af98e3f6d78fdd8e75526c12f91a8a52d4820c25bce02aa02aabe92d38bee7eb2fce07d0691b7b0d
1554b54d47 Static asserts for consistency of fee defaults. (Daniel Kraft)
Pull request description:
This adds `static_assert`'s that ensure that the default values given for fee levels in the wallet (minimum fee and incremental feerate increase) are at least as high as the corresponding levels configured in the core node policy. Since the core policy values are enforced by the network, it makes sense for the wallet to be conservative and above (or at least not below) this.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK 1554b54d47, these assumptions seem straightforward
Tree-SHA512: 50e5adf082f467062334377f82a3ee75bcfd436afc65bd0eb33c8d0549d6d90fd1f48c31f60cabe523eb59be9efa8ae0879e9e09cd51ca9c1bd466631ce03cf4
When using the salvage command, call RecoverDatabaseFile directly
instead of SalvageWallet. Also removes SalvageWallet as it is no longer
needed.
SalvageWallet was doing an additional verify on the database which would
caause the salvage to sometimes fail. This is not needed.
d0ea9bab28 walletdb: Don't remove database transaction logs and instead error (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Instead of removing the database transaction logs and retrying the
wallet loading, just return an error message to the user. Additionally,
speciically for DB_RUNRECOVERY, notify the user that this could be due
to different BDB versions.
Kind of implements the suggestion from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18870#discussion_r421647964
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK d0ea9bab28
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK d0ea9bab28. Only changes since last review are rebase and expanding error and commit messages.
Tree-SHA512: f6e67dc70f58188742a5c8af7cdc63a2b58779aa0d26ae7f1e75805a239f1a342433860e5a238d6577fae5ab04b9d15e7f11c55b867065dfd13781a6a62e4958
b82f0ca4d5 walletdb: Add MakeBatch function to BerkeleyDatabase and use it (Andrew Chow)
eac9200814 walletdb: Refactor DatabaseBatch abstract class from BerkeleyBatch (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
In order to support alternative database systems, we need to have a generic `Batch` class. This PR adds a `DatabaseBatch` abstract class which is implemented by `BerkeleyBatch`. `DatabaseBatch` is now the class that is used by `WalletBatch` to interact with the database. To be able to get the correct type of `DatabaseBatch`, `BerkeleyDatabase` now has a `MakeBatch` function which returns a newly constructed `std::unique_ptr<DatabaseBatch>`. For `BerkeleyDatabase`, that will be `std::unique_ptr<BerkeleyBatch>`.
The `Read`, `Write`, `Erase`, and `Exists` template functions are moved from `BerkeleyBatch`.
Part of #18971
Requires #19308 and #19324
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK b82f0ca4d5
MarcoFalke:
ACK b82f0ca4d5🌘
meshcollider:
LGTM, utACK b82f0ca4d5
Tree-SHA512: 6d2d41631c0983391dbecd702e881c6775b155c90b275df97f7157e42608ed251744f9d7ce5173d02a6c5cc38d90b611880fac7fa635d3d8c4d590681f56ac6a
Instead of removing the database transaction logs and retrying the
wallet loading, just return an error message to the user. Additionally,
specifically for DB_RUNRECOVERY, notify the user that this could be due
to different BDB versions. This error is pretty much only caused by
compiling with a newer version of BDB and then trying to open the wallet
with a version compiled with an older version of BDB.
08fc6f6cfc [rpc] refactor: consolidate sendmany and sendtoaddress code (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
I consolidated code between these two RPC calls, since `sendtoaddress` is essentially `sendmany` with 1 destination.
Unless I overlooked something, the only behaviour change is that some `sendtoaddress` error codes changed from `-4` to `-6`. The release note mentions this.
Salvaged from #18201.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 08fc6f6cfc
jonatack:
ACK 08fc6f6cfc
meshcollider:
Code review & functional test run ACK 08fc6f6cfc
Tree-SHA512: 7b66c52fa0444a4d02fc3f81d9c2a386794d447616026a30111eda35fb46510475eea6506a9ceda00bb4e0230ebb758da5d236b3ac05c954c044fa68a1e3e909
1e58bcc9af wallet: Fix clang build in Mac (Anthony Fieroni)
Pull request description:
Signed-off-by: Anthony Fieroni <bvbfan@abv.bg>
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 19312929af14dab97c37cf4547fbd6589a6de960f1a499c2118bb684240639af4b127cf8dc4d201b41d253cfbb645614a0606d4ecce29f300b10c210d38a961b
a66a7a1a70 walletdb: don't reinitialize desc cache with multiple cache entries (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When loading descriptor caches, we would accidentally reinitialize the descriptor cache when seeing that one already exists. This should have only been initializing the cache when one does not exist. However this code itself is unnecessary as the act of looking up the cache to add to it will initialize it if it didn't already exist.
This issue could be hit by trying to load a wallet that had imported a multisig descriptor. The wallet would fail to load.
A test has been added to wallet_importdescriptors.py to catch this case. Another test case has also been added to check that loading a wallet with only single key descriptors works.
ACKs for top commit:
hugohn:
tACK [a66a7a1](a66a7a1a70)
jonatack:
ACK a66a7a1a70
meshcollider:
Code review ACK a66a7a1a70
Tree-SHA512: 3df746421a008708eaa3bbbdd12b9ddd3e2ec111d54625a212dca7414b971cc1f6e2b1757b3232c31a2f637d1b1ef43bf3ffa4ac4216646cf1e92db5f79954f1
fa73493930 refactor: Use C++11 range-based for loop (MarcoFalke)
fa7b164d62 wallet: Never schedule MaybeCompactWalletDB when -flushwallet is off (MarcoFalke)
faf8401c19 wallet: Pass unused args to StartWallets (MarcoFalke)
fa6c186436 gui tests: Limit life-time of dummy testing setup (MarcoFalke)
fa28a61897 test: Add smoke test to check that wallets are flushed by default (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
User-facing, this is a refactor. Internally, the scheduler does not have to call a mostly empty function every half a second.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK fa73493930
meshcollider:
utACK fa73493930
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa73493930. Just rebased since last review
Tree-SHA512: 99e1fe1b2c22a3f4b19de3e566241d38693f4fd8d5a68ba1838d86740aa6c08e3325c11a072e30fd262a8861af4278bed52eb9374c85179b8f536477f528247c
3a9aba21a4 Split SetWalletFlags into Add/LoadWalletFlags (Andrew Chow)
d9cd095b59 Split SetActiveScriptPubKeyMan into Add/LoadActiveScriptPubKeyMan (Andrew Chow)
0122fbab4c Split SetHDChain into AddHDChain and LoadHDChain (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`SetHDChaiin`, `SetActiveScriptPubKeyMan`, and `SetWalletFlags` have a `memonly` argument which is kind of confusing, as noted in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17681#discussion_r427633081. This PR replaces those functions with `Add*` and `Load*` variants so that they follow the pattern used elsewhere in the wallet.
`AddHDChain`, `AddActiveScriptPubKeyMan`, and `AddWalletFlags` both set their respective variables in `CWallet` and writes them to disk. These functions are used by the actions which modify the wallet such as `sethdseed`, `importdescriptors`, and creating a new wallet.
`LoadHDChain`, `LoadActiveScriptPubKeyMan`, and `LoadWalletFlags` just set the `CWallet` variables. These functions are used by `LoadWallet` when loading the wallet from disk.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 3a9aba21a4
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 3a9aba21a4. Only changes since last review tweaks making m_wallet_flags updates more safe
meshcollider:
utACK 3a9aba21a4
Tree-SHA512: 365aeaafc5ba42879c0eb797ec3beb29ab70e27f917dc880763f743420b3be6ddf797240996beed8a9ad70fb212c2590253c6b44c9dc244529c3939d9538983f
9c59f9c285 Fix ZapSelectTx to sync wallet spends (Anthony Fieroni)
Pull request description:
Signed-off-by: Anthony Fieroni <bvbfan@abv.bg>
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 9c59f9c285
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9c59f9c285. Only change since last review tweaking the for loop as suggested
jonatack:
ACK 9c59f9c285 tested rebased on current master b33136b6ba and the new unit test does indeed fail without the change.
meshcollider:
utACK 9c59f9c285
Tree-SHA512: 71672a5ab0c659550c3a40577614ea896412b79566b5672636ab18765e4c71b9d0a990d94dc6b6e623b03a05737022b04026b5699438809c7c54782d0fd0a5d2
