There is no change in behavior. This just helps prepare for the
transition from boost::filesystem to std::filesystem by avoiding calls
to methods which will be unsafe after the transaction to std::filesystem
to due lack of a boost::filesystem::path::imbue equivalent and inability
to set a predictable locale.
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kiminuo <kiminuo@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
"Fee Delta" is already a term used for prioritizing transactions:
modified = base fees + delta
Here, delta also means the difference between original and modified replacement fees:
nDeltaFees = (original_base + original_delta) - (replacement_base + replacement_delta)
This is insanely confusing. Also, since mempool is no longer a member of a
class (MemPoolAccept.m_pool), the "m" prefix is unnecessary. The rest are
clarity/style-focused changes to already-touched lines.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
ren() { sed -i "s/\<$1\>/$2/g" src/policy/rbf* ; }
ren nDeltaFees additional_fees
ren m_pool pool
ren nSize replacement_vsize
ren nModifiedFees replacement_fees
ren nConflictingFees original_fees
ren oldFeeRate original_feerate
ren newFeeRate replacement_feerate
ren setAncestors ancestors
ren setIterConflicting iters_conflicting
ren setConflictsParents parents_of_conflicts
ren setConflicts direct_conflicts
ren allConflicting all_conflicts
sed -i "s/ hash\b/ txid/g" src/policy/rbf*
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
A "correction" of what seemed to be an overlook was initially proposed in
PR #22779. It was deemed unnecessary to further reduce the dust level,
so document the intention.
Signed-off-by: Antoine Poinsot <darosior@protonmail.com>
A circular dependency is added because policy now depends on txmempool and
txmempool depends on validation. It is natural for [mempool] policy to
rely on mempool; the problem is caused by txmempool depending on
validation. #22677 will resolve this.
13650fe2e5 [policy] detect unsorted packages (glozow)
9ef643e21b [doc] add release note for package testmempoolaccept (glozow)
c4259f4b7e [test] functional test for packages in RPCs (glozow)
9ede34a6f2 [rpc] allow multiple txns in testmempoolaccept (glozow)
ae8e6df709 [policy] limit package sizes (glozow)
c9e1a26d1f [fuzz] add ProcessNewPackage call in tx_pool fuzzer (glozow)
363e3d916c [test] unit tests for ProcessNewPackage (glozow)
cd9a11ac96 [test] make submit optional in CreateValidMempoolTransaction (glozow)
2ef187941d [validation] package validation for test accepts (glozow)
578148ded6 [validation] explicit Success/Failure ctors for MempoolAcceptResult (glozow)
b88d77aec5 [policy] Define packages (glozow)
249f43f3cc [refactor] add option to disable RBF (glozow)
897e348f59 [coins/mempool] extend CCoinsViewMemPool to track temporary coins (glozow)
42cf8b25df [validation] make CheckSequenceLocks context-free (glozow)
Pull request description:
This PR enables validation dry-runs of packages through the `testmempoolaccept` RPC. The expectation is that the results returned from `testmempoolaccept` are what you'd get from test-then-submitting each transaction individually, in that order (this means the package is expected to be sorted in topological order, for now at least). The validation is also atomic: in the case of failure, it immediately halts and may return "unfinished" `MempoolAcceptResult`s for transactions that weren't fully validated. The API for 1 transaction stays the same.
**Motivation:**
- This allows you to test validity for transaction chains (e.g. with multiple spending paths and where you don't want to broadcast yet); closes#18480.
- It's also a first step towards package validation in a minimally invasive way.
- The RPC commit happens to close#21074 by clarifying the "allowed" key.
There are a few added restrictions on the packages, mostly to simplify the logic for areas that aren't critical to main package use cases:
- No package can have conflicts, i.e. none of them can spend the same inputs, even if it would be a valid BIP125 replacement.
- The package cannot conflict with the mempool, i.e. RBF is disabled.
- The total count of the package cannot exceed 25 (the default descendant count limit), and total size cannot exceed 101KvB (the default descendant size limit).
If you're looking for review comments and github isn't loading them, I have a gist compiling some topics of discussion [here](https://gist.github.com/glozow/c3acaf161c95bba491fce31585b2aaf7)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review re-ACK 13650fe2e5
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 13650fe2e5
ariard:
ACK 13650fe
Tree-SHA512: 8c5cbfa91a6c714e1c8710bb281d5ff1c5af36741872a7c5df6b24874d6272b4a09f816cb8a4c7de33ef8e1c2a2c252c0df5105b7802f70bc6ff821ed7cc1a2f
Maximum number of transactions allowed in a package is 25, equal to the
default mempool descendant limit: if a package has more transactions
than this, either it would fail default mempool descendant limit or the
transactions don't all have a dependency relationship (but then they
shouldn't be in a package together). Same rationale for 101KvB virtual
size package limit.
Note that these policies are only used in test accepts so far.
fafd121026 refactor: Make CFeeRate constructor architecture-independent (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the constructor is architecture dependent. This is confusing for several reasons:
* It is impossible to create a transaction larger than the max value of `uint32_t`, so a 64-bit `size_t` is not needed
* Policy (and consensus) code should be arch-independent
* The current code will print spurious compile errors when compiled on 32-bit systems:
```
policy/feerate.cpp:23:22: warning: result of comparison of constant 9223372036854775807 with expression of type 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned int') is always true [-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
assert(nBytes_ <= uint64_t(std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max()));
```
Fix all issues by making it arch-independent. Also, fix `{}` style according to dev notes.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
re-ACK fafd121026
promag:
Code review ACK fafd121026.
Tree-SHA512: e16f75bad9ee8088b87e873906d9b5633449417a6996a226a2f37d33a2b7d4f2fd91df68998a77e52163de20b40c57fadabe7fe3502e599cbb98494178591833
Define the Package type as an alias for a vector of transactions for now.
Add PackageValidationResult, similar to TxValidationResult and
BlockValidationResult for package-wide errors that cannot be reported
within a single transaction result, such as having too many
transactions in the package. We can update the concept of
what a package is and have different logic for packages vs lists of
transactions in the future, e.g. for package relay.
fade6195b1 Move TX_MAX_STANDARD_VERSION to policy (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`primitives` should only be used for the raw datastructures (parsing and format). It is not the right place to document relay policy.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fade6195b1
lontivero:
Concept ACK fade6195b1
Tree-SHA512: f809c4aecd14d7e9feaa7b50b9c0697232991eef36190cd960bcfb0ad6e20c71a4f6aab48c7747cf8a681eb14feda60c55b09a37f128673d519567224f29cd97
An uppercase "ERROR" in the log might indicate a fatal error. Though,
all read-failures for fee_estimates.dat are non-fatal, so avoid the
"ERROR".
Before:
ERROR: CBlockPolicyEstimator::Read(): up-version (149900) fee estimate file
After:
CBlockPolicyEstimator::Read(): unable to read policy estimator data (non-fatal): up-version (149900) fee estimate file
This moves the fee_estimates file management to the CBlockPolicyEstimator
Flush() method.
Co-authored-by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Poinsot <darosior@protonmail.com>
Bitcoin core has a standardness rule for max satisfaction script sig size.
This PR adds to the policy header file so that it is documented along with
along policy rules. The initial reasoning that 1650 is an implicit
limit(would not reached assuming all other policy rules are being
followed) is outdated.
As we now know, bitcoin transactions can have spend conditions are more than
just signatures and there may exist p2sh transactions involving 100 byte
preimages that maybe non-standard because of this rule. Because this
rule is no longer implicit, we should explicitly document it in policy
header file
This adds a `TxoutType::WITNESS_V1_TAPROOT` for P2TR outputs, and permits spending
them in standardness rules. No corresponding `CTxDestination` is added for it,
as that isn't needed until we want wallet integration. The taproot validation flags
are also enabled for mempool transactions, and standardness rules are added
(stack item size limit, no annexes).
This was confusing: which one is the good one ? After testing the value
is right but not the comment, so fix it.
Signed-off-by: Antoine Poinsot <darosior@protonmail.com>
