a512925e19 [doc] Release notes (Amiti Uttarwar)
50f94b34a3 [rpc] Deprecate getpeerinfo addnode field (Amiti Uttarwar)
df091b9b50 [refactor] Rename test file to allow any getpeerinfo deprecations. (Amiti Uttarwar)
395acfa83a [rpc] Add connection type to getpeerinfo RPC, update tests (Amiti Uttarwar)
49c10a9ca4 [log] Add connection type to log statement (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
After #19316, we can more directly expose information about the connection type on the `getpeerinfo` RPC. Doing so also makes the existing addnode field redundant, so this PR begins the process of deprecating this field.
This PR also includes one commit that improves a log message, as both use a shared function to return the connection type as a string.
Suggested by sdaftuar- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19316#discussion_r468001604 & https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19316#discussion_r468018093
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK a512925e19.
sipa:
utACK a512925e19
guggero:
Tested and code review ACK a512925e.
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK a512925e19🌇
promag:
Code review ACK a512925e19.
Tree-SHA512: 601a7a38aee235ee59aca690784f886dc2ae4e418b2e6422c4b58cd597376c00f74910f66920b08a08a0bec28bf8022e71a1435785ff6ba8a188954261aba78e
0bd1184adf Remove unused LockAssertion struct (Hennadii Stepanov)
ab2a44297f Replace LockAssertion with a proper thread safety annotations (Hennadii Stepanov)
73f71e1996 refactor: Use explicit function type instead of template (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR replaces `LockAssertion` with `AssertLockHeld`, and removes `LockAssertion`.
This PR is compared with alternatives in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/AssertLockHeld-PRs
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 0bd1184adf
ajtowns:
ACK 0bd1184adf
vasild:
ACK 0bd1184ad
Tree-SHA512: ef7780dd689faf0bb479fdb97c49bc652e2dd10c148234bb95502dfbb676442d8565ee37864d923ca21a25f9dc2a335bf46ee82c095e387b59a664ab05c0ae41
In addition to adding more specificity to the log statement about the type of
connection, this change also consolidates two statements into one. Previously,
the second one should have never been hit, since block-relay connections would
match the "!IsInboundConn()" condition and return early.
ddefb5c0b7 p2p: Use the greatest common version in peer logic (Hennadii Stepanov)
e084d45562 p2p: Remove SetCommonVersion() from VERACK handler (Hennadii Stepanov)
8d2026796a refactor: Rename local variable nSendVersion (Hennadii Stepanov)
e9a6d8b13b p2p: Unify Send and Receive protocol versions (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On master (6fef85bfa3) `CNode` has two members to keep protocol version:
- `nRecvVersion` for received messages
- `nSendVersion` for messages to send
After exchanging with `VERSION` and `VERACK` messages via protocol version `INIT_PROTO_VERSION`, both nodes set `nRecvVersion` _and_ `nSendVersion` to _the same_ value which is the greatest common protocol version.
This PR:
- replaces two `CNode` members, `nRecvVersion` `nSendVersion`, with `m_greatest_common_version`
- removes duplicated getter and setter
There is no change in behavior on the P2P network.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK ddefb5c0b7
naumenkogs:
ACK ddefb5c0b7
fjahr:
Code review ACK ddefb5c0b7
amitiuttarwar:
code review but untested ACK ddefb5c0b7
benthecarman:
utACK `ddefb5c`
Tree-SHA512: 5305538dbaa5426b923b0afd20bdef4f248d310855d1d78427210c00716c67b7cb691515c421716b6157913e453076e293b10ff5fd2cd26a8e5375d42da7809d
0d04784af1 Refactor the functional test (Gleb Naumenko)
83ad65f31b Address nits in ADDR caching (Gleb Naumenko)
81b00f8780 Add indexing ADDR cache by local socket addr (Gleb Naumenko)
42ec558542 Justify the choice of ADDR cache lifetime (Gleb Naumenko)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up on #18991 which does 3 things:
- improves privacy of a node listening to multiple addresses via adding cache index by local socket addr (suggested [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18991#issuecomment-668219345))
- documents on the choice of 24h cache lifetime
- addresses nits from #18991
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 0d04784af1
vasild:
ACK 0d04784
jonatack:
Code review ACK 0d04784
Tree-SHA512: bb65a34dd1ce2811186d3e4469bc33e8399cebaaa494ce13041c7cff23275870e4176a719f7a72f8d779c49f8b2344bf4fa1aeb3ea4e2626d5ae76514f00a750
a8a64acaf3 [BroadcastTransaction] Remove unsafe move operator (Amiti Uttarwar)
125c038126 [p2p] Remove dead code (Amiti Uttarwar)
fc66d0a65c [p2p] Check for nullptr before dereferencing pointer (Adam Jonas)
cb79b9dbf4 [mempool] Revert unbroadcast set to tracking just txid (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
Addresses some outstanding review comments from #18044
- reverts unbroadcast txids to a set instead of a map (simpler, communicates intent better, takes less space, no efficiency advantages of map)
- adds safety around two touchpoints (check for nullptr before dereferencing pointer, remove an inaccurate std::move operator)
- removes some dead code
Links to comments on wtxid PR: [1](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18044#discussion_r460495254) [2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18044#discussion_r460496023) [3](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18044#discussion_r463532611)
thanks to jnewbery & adamjonas for flagging these ! !
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
utACK a8a64acaf3
naumenkogs:
utACK a8a64acaf3
jnewbery:
utACK a8a64acaf3
Tree-SHA512: 7be669cb30cc17fb9e06b50e636ef7887c6a27354697987e4e4d38dba4b8f50e175647587430cd9bc3295bec01ce8b1e6639a50a4249d8fff9b1ca1b9ead3277
bb6a32ce99 [net processing] Move Misbehaving() to PeerManager (John Newbery)
aa114b1c9b [net_processing] Move SendBlockTransactions into PeerManager (John Newbery)
3115e00f75 [net processing] Move MaybePunishPeerForTx to PeerManager (John Newbery)
e662e2d42a [net processing] Move ProcessOrphanTx to PeerManager (John Newbery)
b70cd890e3 [net processing] Move MaybePunishNodeForBlock into PeerManager (John Newbery)
d7778351bf [net processing] Move ProcessHeadersMessage to PeerManager (John Newbery)
64f6162651 [whitespace] tidy up indentation after scripted diff (John Newbery)
58bd369b0d scripted-diff: [net processing] Rename PeerLogicValidation to PeerManager (John Newbery)
2297b26b3c [net_processing] Pass chainparams to PeerLogicValidation constructor (John Newbery)
824bbd1ffb [move only] Collect all private members of PeerLogicValidation together (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Continues the work of moving net_processing logic into PeerLogicValidation. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19704 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19607#discussion_r462032894 for motivation.
This PR also renames `PeerLogicValidation` to `PeerManager` as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10756#pullrequestreview-53892618.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK bb6a32ce99 only change is rebase due to conflict in struct NodeContext and variable rename 🤸
hebasto:
re-ACK bb6a32ce99, only rebased, and added renaming `s/peer_logic/peerman/` into scripted-diff since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19791#pullrequestreview-483118079) review (verified with `git range-diff`).
Tree-SHA512: a2de4a521688fd25125b401e5575402c52b328a0fa27b3010567008d4f596b960aabbd02b2d81f42658f88f4365443fadb1008150a62fbcea123fb42d85a2c21
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/PeerLogicValidation/PeerManager/g' $(git grep -l PeerLogicValidation ./src ./test)
sed -i 's/peer_logic/peerman/g' $(git grep -l peer_logic ./src ./test)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
PeerLogicValidation was originally net_processing's implementation to
the validation interface. It has since grown to contain much of
net_processing's logic. Therefore rename it to reflect its
responsibilities.
Suggested in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10756#pullrequestreview-53892618.
Keep a references to chainparams, rather than calling the global
Params() function every time it's needed. This is fine, since
globalChainParams does not get updated once it's been set, and it's
available at the point of constructing the PeerLogicValidation object.
We don't have a project style for ordering class members, but it always
makes sense to have no more than one of each public/protected/private
specifier.
Also move documentation for MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect to the header.
296be8f58e Get rid of unused functions CTxMemPool::GetMemPoolChildren, CTxMemPool::GetMemPoolParents (Jeremy Rubin)
46d955d196 Remove mapLinks in favor of entry inlined structs with iterator type erasure (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
Currently we have a peculiar data structure in the mempool called maplinks. Maplinks job is to track the in-pool children and parents of each transaction. This PR can be primarily understood and reviewed as a simple refactoring to remove this extra data structure, although it comes with a nice memory and performance improvement for free.
Maplinks is particularly peculiar because removing it is not as simple as just moving it's inner structure to the owning CTxMempoolEntry. Because TxLinks (the class storing the setEntries for parents and children) store txiters to each entry in the mempool corresponding to the parent or child, it means that the TxLinks type is "aware" of the boost multiindex (mapTx) it's coming from, which is in turn, aware of the entry type stored in mapTx. Thus we used maplinks to store this entry associated data we in an entirely separate data structure just to avoid a circular type reference caused by storing a txiter inside a CTxMempoolEntry.
It turns out, we can kill this circular reference by making use of iterator_to multiindex function and std::reference_wrapper. This allows us to get rid of the maplinks data structure and move the ownership of the parents/child sets to the entries themselves.
The benefit of this good all around, for any of the reasons given below the change would be acceptable, and it doesn't make the code harder to reason about or worse in any respect (as far as I can tell, there's no tradeoff).
### Simpler ownership model
No longer having to consistency check that mapLinks did have records for our CTxMempoolEntry, impossible to have a mapLinks entry outlive or incorrectly die before a CTxMempoolEntry.
### Memory Usage
We get rid of a O(Transactions) sized map in the mempool, which is a long lived data structure.
### Performance
If you have a CTxMemPoolEntry, you immediately know the address of it's children/parents, rather than having to do a O(log(Transactions)) lookup via maplinks (which we do very often). We do it in *so many* places that a true benchmark has to look at a full running node, but it is easy enough to show an improvement in this case.
The ComplexMemPool shows a good coherence check that we see the expected result of it being 12.5% faster / 1.14x faster.
```
Before:
# Benchmark, evals, iterations, total, min, max, median
ComplexMemPool, 5, 1, 1.40462, 0.277222, 0.285339, 0.279793
After:
# Benchmark, evals, iterations, total, min, max, median
ComplexMemPool, 5, 1, 1.22586, 0.243831, 0.247076, 0.244596
```
The ComplexMemPool benchmark only checks doing addUnchecked and TrimToSize for 800 transactions. While this bench does a good job of hammering the relevant types of function, it doesn't test everything.
Subbing in 5000 transactions shows a that the advantage isn't completely wiped out by other asymptotic factors (this isn't the only bottleneck in growing the mempool), but it's only a bit proportionally slower (10.8%, 1.12x), which adds evidence that this will be a good change for performance minded users.
```
# Benchmark, evals, iterations, total, min, max, median
ComplexMemPool, 5, 1, 59.1321, 11.5919, 12.235, 11.7068
# Benchmark, evals, iterations, total, min, max, median
ComplexMemPool, 5, 1, 52.1307, 10.2641, 10.5206, 10.4306
```
I don't think it's possible to come up with an example of where a maplinks based design would have better performance, but it's something for reviewers to consider.
# Discussion
## Why maplinks in the first place?
I spoke with the author of mapLinks (sdaftuar) a while back, and my recollection from our conversation was that it was implemented because he did not know how to resolve the circular dependency at the time, and there was no other reason for making it a separate map.
## Is iterator_to weird?
iterator_to is expressly for this purpose, see https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_51_0/libs/multi_index/doc/tutorial/indices.html#iterator_to
> iterator_to provides a way to retrieve an iterator to an element from a pointer to the element, thus making iterators and pointers interchangeable for the purposes of element pointing (not so for traversal) in many situations. This notwithstanding, it is not the aim of iterator_to to promote the usage of pointers as substitutes for real iterators: the latter are specifically designed for handling the elements of a container, and not only benefit from the iterator orientation of container interfaces, but are also capable of exposing many more programming bugs than raw pointers, both at compile and run time. iterator_to is thus meant to be used in scenarios where access via iterators is not suitable or desireable:
>
> - Interoperability with preexisting APIs based on pointers or references.
> - Publication of pointer-based interfaces (for instance, when designing a C-compatible library).
> - The exposure of pointers in place of iterators can act as a type erasure barrier effectively decoupling the user of the code from the implementation detail of which particular container is being used. Similar techniques, like the famous Pimpl idiom, are used in large projects to reduce dependencies and build times.
> - Self-referencing contexts where an element acts upon its owner container and no iterator to itself is available.
In other words, iterator_to is the perfect tool for the job by the last reason given. Under the hood it should just be a simple pointer cast and have no major runtime overhead (depending on if the function call is inlined).
Edit by laanwj: removed at sign from the description
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK 296be8f per `git range-diff ab338a19 3ba1665 296be8f`, sanity check gcc 10.2 debug build is clean.
hebasto:
re-ACK 296be8f58e, only rebased since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19478#pullrequestreview-482400727) review (verified with `git range-diff`).
Tree-SHA512: f5c30a4936fcde6ae32a02823c303b3568a747c2681d11f87df88a149f984a6d3b4c81f391859afbeb68864ef7f6a3d8779f74a58e3de701b3d51f78e498682e
86d4cf42d9 Increase the ip address relay branching factor for unreachable networks (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Onion addresses propagate very badly among the IPv4/IPv6 network, resulting
in difficulty for those to find each other.
The branching factor 1 is probably so low that propagations die out before
they reach another onion peer. Increase it to 1.5 on average.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 86d4cf42d9 -- patch looks correct
naumenkogs:
ACK 86d4cf4
jonatack:
ACK 86d4cf42d9. Code review, built and running with some sanity check logging. `RelayAddress()` is called by `ProcessMessage() ADDR` msg handling, from within the loop while processing each new address to relay it to a limited number of other nodes. According to git blame, the line setting `nRelayNodes` hasn't been touched since 2016 in e736772c56 *Move network-msg-processing code out of main to its own file*, which moved the line but otherwise did not change it. Running a mixed clearnet/onion node with this patch and the logging below, I'm only seeing values of `fReachable 1, nRelayNodes 2`. IIUC, I need to use the settings in `init.cpp` that call `SetReachable(*, false)`. *Edit:* with `onlynet=onion` am now seeing entries of `fReachable 0` with `nRelayNodes` values of 1 and 2.
vasild:
ACK 86d4cf42d
Tree-SHA512: 22391e16d60bcfdec9a9336728da39d68a24a183b3d1b0e8fbc038d265ca6ddf71d16db018f3678745fd9f3e9281049e42197fa0a29124833c50a9170ed6f793
The else clause is dead code because the only way to not enter the if branch is
if TX_WITNESS_STRIPPED is true. In that case, it would not have a witness to
match the `tx.HasWitness()` else condition.
Co-authored-by: Adam Jonas <jonas@chaincode.com>
Co-authored-by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com>
When I originally implemented the unbroadcast set in 18038, it just tracked
txids. After 18038 was merged, I offered a patch to 18044 to make the
unbroadcast changes compatible with wtxid relay. In this patch, I updated
`unbroadcast_txids` to a map of txid -> wtxid. Post merge review comments shed
light on the fact that this update was unnecessary, and distracting. So, this
commit updates the unbroadcast ids back to a set.
Previously we deduced it was a block-relay-only based on presence of the
m_tx_relay structure. Now we have the ability to identify it directly via a
connection type accessor function.
We previously identified if we relay addresses to the connection by checking
for the existence of the m_addr_known data structure. With this commit, we
answer this question based on the connection type.
IsAddrRelayPeer() checked for the existence of the m_addr_known
fb56d37612 p2p: ensure inv is GenMsgTx before ToGenTxid in inv processing (John Newbery)
aa3621385e test: use CInv::MSG_WITNESS_TX flag in p2p_segwit (Jon Atack)
24ee4f01ea p2p: make gtxid(.hash) and fAlreadyHave localvars const (Jon Atack)
b1c855453b p2p: use CInv block message helpers in net_processing.cpp (Jon Atack)
acd6642167 [net processing] Change AlreadyHaveTx() to take a GenTxid (John Newbery)
5fdfb80b86 [net processing] Change AlreadyHaveBlock() to take block_hash argument (John Newbery)
430e183b89 [net processing] Remove mempool argument from AlreadyHaveBlock() (John Newbery)
42ca5618ca [net processing] Split AlreadyHave() into separate block and tx functions (John Newbery)
39f1dc9445 p2p: remove nFetchFlags from NetMsgType TX and INV processing (Jon Atack)
471714e1f0 p2p: add CInv block message helper methods (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Building on #19590 and the recent `wtxid` and `GenTxid` changes, this is a refactoring and cleanup PR to simplify and improve some of the net processing code.
Some of the diffs are best reviewed with `-w` to ignore spacing.
Co-authored by John Newbery.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fb56d37612
jnewbery:
utACK fb56d37612
vasild:
ACK fb56d3761
Tree-SHA512: ba39b58e6aaf850880a842fe5f6295e9f1870906ef690206acfc17140aae2ac854981e1066dbcd4238062478762fbd040ef772fdc2c50eea6869997c583e6a6d
ea74e10acf doc: Add best practice for annotating/asserting locks (Hennadii Stepanov)
2ee7743fe7 sync.h: Make runtime lock checks require compile-time lock checks (Anthony Towns)
23d71d171e Do not hide compile-time thread safety warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)
3ddc150857 Add missed thread safety annotations (Hennadii Stepanov)
af9ea55a72 Use LockAssertion utility class instead of AssertLockHeld() (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On the way of transit from `RecursiveMutex` to `Mutex` (see #19303) it is crucial to have run-time `AssertLockHeld()` assertion that does _not_ hide compile-time Clang Thread Safety Analysis warnings.
On master (65e4ecabd5) using `AssertLockHeld()` could hide Clang Thread Safety Analysis warnings, e.g., with the following patch applied:
```diff
--- a/src/txmempool.h
+++ b/src/txmempool.h
@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ public:
void addUnchecked(const CTxMemPoolEntry& entry, setEntries& setAncestors, bool validFeeEstimate = true) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs, cs_main);
void removeRecursive(const CTransaction& tx, MemPoolRemovalReason reason) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs);
- void removeForReorg(const CCoinsViewCache* pcoins, unsigned int nMemPoolHeight, int flags) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs, cs_main);
+ void removeForReorg(const CCoinsViewCache* pcoins, unsigned int nMemPoolHeight, int flags) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main);
void removeConflicts(const CTransaction& tx) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs);
void removeForBlock(const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& vtx, unsigned int nBlockHeight) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs);
```
Clang compiles the code without any thread safety warnings.
See "Add missed thread safety annotations" commit for the actual thread safety warnings that are fixed in this PR.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK ea74e10acf 🎙
jnewbery:
ACK ea74e10acf
ajtowns:
ACK ea74e10acf
Tree-SHA512: 8cba996e526751a1cb0e613c0cc1b10f027a3e9945fbfb4bd30f6355fd36b9f9c2e1e95ed3183fc254b42df7c30223278e18e5bdb5e1ef85db7fef067595d447
This change prepares for upcoming commit "Do not hide compile-time
thread safety warnings" by replacing AssertLockHeld() with
LockAssertion() where needed.
8e35bf5906 scripted-diff: rename misbehavior members (John Newbery)
1f96d2e673 [net processing] Move misbehavior tracking state to Peer (John Newbery)
7cd4159ac8 [net processing] Add Peer (John Newbery)
aba03359a6 [net processing] Remove CNodeState.name (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
We currently have two structures for per-peer data:
- `CNode` in net, which should just contain connection layer data (eg socket, send/recv buffers, etc), but currently also contains some application layer data (eg tx/block inventory).
- `CNodeState` in net processing, which contains p2p application layer data, but requires cs_main to be locked for access.
This PR adds a third struct `Peer`, which is for p2p application layer data, and doesn't require cs_main. Eventually all application layer data from `CNode` should be moved to `Peer`, and any data that doesn't strictly require cs_main should be moved from `CNodeState` to `Peer` (probably all of `CNodeState` eventually).
`Peer` objects are stored as shared pointers in a net processing global map `g_peer_map`, which is protected by `g_peer_mutex`. To use a `Peer` object, `g_peer_mutex` is locked, a copy of the shared pointer is taken, and the lock is released. Individual members of `Peer` are protected by different mutexes that guard related data. The lifetime of the `Peer` object is managed by the shared_ptr refcount.
This PR adds the `Peer` object and moves the misbehaving data from `CNodeState` to `Peer`. This allows us to immediately remove 15 `LOCK(cs_main)` instances.
For more motivation see #19398
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 8e35bf5906
troygiorshev:
reACK 8e35bf5906 via `git range-diff master 9510938 8e35bf5`
theuni:
ACK 8e35bf5906.
jonatack:
ACK 8e35bf5906 keeping in mind Cory's comment (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19607#discussion_r470173964) for the follow-up
Tree-SHA512: ad84a92b78fb34c9f43813ca3dfbc7282c887d55300ea2ce0994d134da3e0c7dbc44d54380e00b13bb75a57c28857ac3236bea9135467075d78026767a19e4b1
and otherwise log that an unknown INV type was received.
In INV processing, when handling transaction type inv messages,
ToGenTxid() expects that we constructed the CInv ourselves or
that we verified that it is for a transaction type CInv.
Therefore, change this `else` branch into an `else if (inv.GenMsgTx())`
to make this safer and log any INVs that fall through.
The nFetchFlags code can be removed here because GetFetchFlags() can only add
the MSG_WITNESS_FLAG, which is added to the CInv::type field. That CInv is only
passed to AlreadyHave() or ToGenTxid(), and neither of those functions do
anything different depending on whether the CInv type is MSG_TX or
MSG_WITNESS_TX.
Co-authored by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com>
daed542a12 [net_processing] Move ProcessMessage to PeerLogicValidation (John Newbery)
c556770b5e [net_processing] Change PeerLogicValidation to hold a connman reference (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Rather than ProcessMessage() being a static function in net_processing.cpp, make it a private member function of PeerLogicValidation. This is the start of moving static functions and global variables into PeerLogicValidation to make it better encapsulated.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK daed542a12 code review and debug tested
promag:
Code review ACK daed542a12.
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK daed542a12, only change is removing second commit 🎴
theStack:
Code Review ACK daed542a12
Tree-SHA512: ddebf410d114d9ad5a9e536950018ff333a347c035d74fcc101fb4a3f20a281782c7eac2b7d1bd1c8f6bc7e59f5b5630fb52c2e1b4c32df454fa584673bd021e
Onion addresses propagate very badly among the IPv4/IPv6 network, resulting
in difficulty for those to find each other.
The branching factor 1 is probably so low that propagations die out before
they reach another onion peer. Increase it to 1.5 on average.
