fa8a1c0696 rpc: Fix Univalue push_backV OOM in listtransactions (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Related to, but not intended as a fix for #25229.
Currently the RPC will have the same data stored thrice:
* `UniValue ret` (memory filled by `ListTransactions`)
* `std::vector<UniValue> vec` (constructed by calling `push_backV`)
* `UniValue result` (the actual result, memory filled by `push_backV`)
Fix this by filling the memory only once:
* `std::vector<UniValue> ret` (memory filled by `ListTransactions`)
* Pass iterators to `push_backV` instead of creating a full copy
* Move memory into `UniValue result` instead of copying it
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
Code Review ACK fa8a1c0696
Tree-SHA512: 1c3ca40fc8497134a4141195160e4aa9fe72b3c00c5998c972b58ad0eb498ebea05013f9105bb80e7264c9db1d0e7a2032396a8a4af1f326d831fbee20f32ea3
07f2c25d04 refactor: add most of src/util to iwyu (fanquake)
Pull request description:
These files change infrequently, and not much header shuffling is required.
We don't add everything in src/util/ yet, because IWYU makes some
dubious suggestions, which I'm going to follow up with upstream.
Soon we'll swap `src/util/xyz.cpp` for just `src/util/`.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 07f2c25d04, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 07d76435c2bff1a62c4967eb0efaafe619cc3bbaf4166741d8520927b24336c01aee59822f8082ee2a01e15046a0f5d506b4b23a6e40ceb750f3226ed8167847
2ef5294a5b rpc: add RPCTypeCheck for getblockfrompeer inputs (Jon Atack)
734b9669ff test: add getblockfrompeer coverage of invalid inputs (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
The new getblockfrompeer RPC lacks test coverage for invalid arguments, and its error messages are not harmonized with the existing RPCs.
Fix all issues.
ACKs for top commit:
brunoerg:
ACK 2ef5294a5b
Tree-SHA512: 454782cf6a44fd0e05483bb152153667ef5c8021358385ddcf89724fbbbd35e187362bdff757e00c99319527bc4c0b20c7187f67241d4585d767a29787142f25
c6c35db057 wallet: change `ScanForWalletTransactions` to use `Ticks()` (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
This PR changes `ScanForWalletTransactions()` to use the `Ticks(Dur2 d)` function (introduced in #25456).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK c6c35db057
Tree-SHA512: 864e136b470baf22293dc03ae3400bbb34955389a1efc83862f006cfac84da9128c3a201ef051606c06f782a1fde84129261dd4b417cbfff854d5c359a92703e
fa4be8e7c3 move-only: InitializeNode to handshake helper (MacroFake)
fa7098947c move-only: Version handshake to libtest_util (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
The version handshake after setting up a peer is an integral part of (unit) testing net processing logic.
Thus, make the helper accessible in libtest_util.
Also, remove the peerman argument from `FillNode`, as it must be equal to connman's peerman, which can then be used instead.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
ACK fa4be8e7c3
Tree-SHA512: 8296399dc2c29196bd56584c9b61f1c5a088f96dd3438b07b84e1acf525d867f1e37fdfdeede8a831add25848cda0c221ce3fb873e5ae5ca805a1765aa08eb12
111ea3ab71 wallet: refactor GetNewDestination, use BResult (furszy)
22351725bc send: refactor CreateTransaction flow to return a BResult<CTransactionRef> (furszy)
198fcca162 wallet: refactor, include 'FeeCalculation' inside 'CreatedTransactionResult' (furszy)
7a45c33d1f Introduce generic 'Result' class (furszy)
Pull request description:
Based on a common function signature pattern that we have all around the sources:
```cpp
bool doSomething(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4, &result_obj, &error_string) {
// do something...
if (error) {
error_string = "something bad happened";
return false;
}
result = goodResult;
return true;
}
```
Introduced a generic class `BResult` that encapsulate the function boolean result, the result object (in case of having it) and, in case of failure, the string error reason.
Obtaining in this way cleaner function signatures and removing boilerplate code:
```cpp
BResult<Obj> doSomething(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4) {
// do something...
if (error) return "something bad happened";
return goodResult;
}
```
Same cleanup applies equally to the function callers' side as well. There is no longer need to add the error string and the result object declarations before calling the function:
Before:
```cpp
Obj result_obj;
std::string error_string;
if (!doSomething(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4, result_obj, error_string)) {
LogPrintf("Error: %s", error_string);
}
return result_obj;
```
Now:
```cpp
BResult<Obj> op_res = doSomething(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4);
if (!op_res) {
LogPrintf("Error: %s", op_res.GetError());
}
return op_res.GetObjResult();
```
### Initial Implementation:
Have connected this new concept to two different flows for now:
1) The `CreateTransaction` flow. --> 7ba2b87c
2) The `GetNewDestination` flow. --> bcee0912
Happy note: even when introduced a new class into the sources, the amount of lines removed is almost equal to added ones :).
Extra note: this work is an extended version (and a decoupling) of the work that is inside #24845 (which does not contain the `GetNewDestination` changes nor the inclusion of the `FeeCalculation` field inside `CreatedTransactionResult`).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 111ea3ab71
w0xlt:
reACK 111ea3ab71
theStack:
re-ACK 111ea3ab71
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 111ea3ab71🎏
Tree-SHA512: 6d84d901a4cb923727067f25ff64542a40edd1ea84fdeac092312ac684c34e3688a52ac5eb012717d2b73f4cb742b9d78e458eb0e9cb9d6d72a916395be91f69
d5c141f221 qt: apply translator comments to reset options confirmation dialog (Jarol Rodriguez)
Pull request description:
This is a followup to #617. Because the strings were being concatenated, we can not apply translator comments to all of the revelant strings. This can be tested by applying the following diff to current master and running `make translate`; then check the resulting diff:
```diff
diff --git a/src/qt/optionsdialog.cpp b/src/qt/optionsdialog.cpp
index 462b923d6..3cf165004 100644
--- a/src/qt/optionsdialog.cpp
+++ b/src/qt/optionsdialog.cpp
@@ -286,9 +286,17 @@ void OptionsDialog::on_resetButton_clicked()
{
if (model) {
// confirmation dialog
+ //: Window title text of pop-up window shown when the user has chosen to reset options.
QMessageBox::StandardButton btnRetVal = QMessageBox::question(this, tr("Confirm options reset"),
+ /*: Text explaining that the settings the user changed will not come
+ into effect until the client is restarted. */
tr("Client restart required to activate changes.") + "<br><br>" +
+ /*: Text explaining to the user that the client's current settings
+ will be backed up at a specific location. %1 is a stand-in
+ argument for the backup location's path. */
tr("Current settings will be backed up at \"%1\".").arg(m_client_model->dataDir()) + "<br><br>" +
+ /*: Text asking the user to confirm if they would like to proceed
+ with a client shutdown. */
tr("Client will be shut down. Do you want to proceed?"),
QMessageBox::Yes | QMessageBox::Cancel, QMessageBox::Cancel);
```
To apply the above translator comments, what we want to do instead is have a variable in which the translatable strings are appended to using the [QString append function](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qstring.html#append).
When you run `make translate` with this PR, you will see the translator comments properly applied, as shown below:
``` diff
diff --git a/src/qt/locale/bitcoin_en.ts b/src/qt/locale/bitcoin_en.ts
index 35d820187..9e5158b3e 100644
--- a/src/qt/locale/bitcoin_en.ts
+++ b/src/qt/locale/bitcoin_en.ts
@@ -1942,28 +1942,37 @@ Signing is only possible with addresses of the type 'legacy'.</source>
<translation>default</translation>
</message>
<message>
- <location line="+81"/>
+ <location line="+86"/>
<source>none</source>
<translation type="unfinished"></translation>
</message>
<message>
- <location line="+97"/>
+ <location line="+107"/>
<source>Confirm options reset</source>
+ <extracomment>Window title text of pop-up window shown when the user has chosen to reset options.</extracomment>
<translation>Confirm options reset</translation>
</message>
<message>
- <location line="+1"/>
- <location line="+70"/>
+ <location line="-9"/>
+ <location line="+79"/>
<source>Client restart required to activate changes.</source>
+ <extracomment>Text explaining that the settings changed will not come into effect until the client is restarted.</extracomment>
+ <translation type="unfinished"></translation>
+ </message>
+ <message>
+ <location line="-75"/>
+ <source>Current settings will be backed up at "%1".</source>
+ <extracomment>Text explaining to the user that the client's current settings will be backed up at a specific location. %1 is a stand-in argument for the backup location's path.</extracomment>
<translation type="unfinished"></translation>
</message>
<message>
- <location line="-70"/>
+ <location line="+3"/>
<source>Client will be shut down. Do you want to proceed?</source>
+ <extracomment>Text asking the user to confirm if they would like to proceed with a client shutdown.</extracomment>
<translation type="unfinished"></translation>
</message>
<message>
- <location line="+18"/>
+ <location line="+20"/>
<source>Configuration options</source>
<extracomment>Window title text of pop-up box that allows opening up of configuration file.</extracomment>
<translation type="unfinished"></translation>
```
No difference in rendering between master and PR
| master | PR |
| ------- | --- |
<img width="532" alt="Screen Shot 2022-06-29 at 11 39 17 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/176588495-9d3761b6-9d96-489a-bbe5-a8907f7d5f99.png"> | <img width="532" alt="Screen Shot 2022-06-29 at 11 39 51 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/176588513-92e29564-b74a-46f5-a5dd-469c4ee953f7.png"> |
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
ACK d5c141f221
furszy:
Tested ACK d5c141f2, no functional changes.
w0xlt:
tACK d5c141f221
Tree-SHA512: 6175a096c6f99edb3041cc2429e1ea0670a10cd2cab0364f664a56c7dee1aa8631d52c0a36edb5d571f6ef934e947d45017e446cea7dddae044085c39c8835ef
230a2f4cc3 wallet test: Add unit test for wallet scan save_progress option (Ryan Ofsky)
a89ddfbe22 wallet: Save wallet scan progress (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
Currently, the wallet scan progress is not saved.
If it is interrupted, it will be necessary to start from scratch on the next load.
This PR changes this and the progress is saved right after checking a block.
Close https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25010
ACKs for top commit:
furszy:
re-ACK 230a2f4
achow101:
ACK 230a2f4cc3
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 230a2f4cc3. Only change since last review is tweaking whitespace and adding log print
Tree-SHA512: 1a9dec207ed22b3443fb06a4daf967637bc02bcaf71c070b7dc33605d0cab959551e4014c9e92293a63f54c5cbcc98bb9f8844a8c60bc32a1482b1c4130fab32
98ea43d5e9 test: add tests for negative waste during coin selection (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
#25495 mentions that waste can be negative when the current feerate is less than the long term feerate. There are currently no waste tests for negative waste, so this PR adds two of them.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 98ea43d5e9
glozow:
light code review ACK 98ea43d5e9, good to have tests for negative waste
Tree-SHA512: d194d370f1257975959d3c601fea9f82c30c1aabc3e8bedc997c62659283fe681cc527e59df1a0187b3c91e8067c60374dd5ce0237561bd882edafe6a575a9b9
d54c5c8b1b wallet: use CCoinControl to estimate signature size (S3RK)
a94659c84e wallet: replace GetTxSpendSize with CalculateMaximumSignedInputSize (S3RK)
Pull request description:
Currently `DummySignTx` and `DummySignInput` use different ways to determine signature size.
This PR unifies the way wallet estimates signature size for various inputs.
Instead of passing boolean flags from calling code the `use_max_sig` is now calculated at the place of signature creation using information available in `CCoinControl`
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d54c5c8b1b
theStack:
Code-review ACK d54c5c8b1b
Tree-SHA512: e790903ad4683067070aa7dbf7434a1bd142282a5bc425112e64d88d27559f1a2cd60c68d6022feaf6b845237035cb18ece10f6243d719ba28173b69bd99110a
Useful to encapsulate the function result object (in case of having it) or, in case of failure, the failure reason.
This let us clean lot of boilerplate code, as now instead of returning a boolean and having to add a ref arg for the
return object and another ref for the error string. We can simply return a 'BResult<Obj>'.
Example of what we currently have:
```
bool doSomething(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4, &result, &error_string) {
do something...
if (error) {
error_string = "something bad happened";
return false;
}
result = goodResult;
return true;
}
```
Example of what we will get with this commit:
```
BResult<Obj> doSomething(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4) {
do something...
if (error) return {"something happened"};
// good
return {goodResult};
}
```
This allows a similar boilerplate cleanup on the function callers side as well. They don't have to add the extra
pre-function-call error string and result object declarations to pass the references to the function.
d69045e291 test: add coverage for 'listreceivedbyaddress' no change addrs return (furszy)
324f00a642 refactor: 'ListReceived' use optional for filtered address (furszy)
b459fc122f refactor: RPC 'ListReceived', encapsulate m_address_book access (furszy)
fa9f2ab8fd refactor: RPC 'listlabels', encapsulate 'CWallet::ListAddrBookLabels' functionality (furszy)
83e42c4b94 refactor: use 'ForEachAddrBookEntry' in RPC 'getaddressesbylabel' (furszy)
2b48642499 refactor: use ForEachAddrBookEntry in interfaces::getAddresses (furszy)
032842ae41 wallet: implement ForEachAddrBookEntry method (furszy)
09649bc95d refactor: implement general 'ListAddrBookAddresses' for addressbook destinations lookup (furszy)
192eb1e61c refactor: getAddress don't access m_address_book, use FindAddressEntry function (furszy)
Pull request description:
### Context
The wallet's `m_address_book` field is being accessed directly from several places across the sources.
### Problem
Code structure wise, we shouldn't be accessing it directly. It could end up being modified by mistake (from a place that has nothing to do with the wallet like an RPC command or the GUI) and cause a bigger issue: like an address book entry 'purpose' string change, which if done badly (from 'send' to 'receive'), could end up in a user sharing a "receive" address that he/she doesn't own.
### Solution
Encapsulate `m_address_book` access inside the wallet.
-------------------------------------------------------
Extra Note:
This is the initial step towards decoupling the address book functionality from the wallet's sources. In other words, the creation of the `AddressBookManager` (which will be coming in a follow-up PR).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d69045e291
theStack:
ACK d69045e291✅
w0xlt:
ACK d69045e291
Tree-SHA512: dba17acd86f171b4e9af0223bbbcad380048570f6a2f6a92732a51f01abe8806debaf65c9e9e5569fa76a541903cbb50adcb5f56ef77858151c698ae6b218e2a
These files change infrequently, and not much header shuffling is required.
We don't add everything in src/util/ yet, because IWYU makes some
dubious suggestions, which I'm going to follow up with upstream.
4c9666bd73 Mention `mempoolfullrbf` in policy/mempool-replacements.md (Antoine Riard)
aae66ab43d Update getmempoolinfo RPC with `mempoolfullrbf` (Antoine Riard)
3e27e31727 Introduce `mempoolfullrbf` node setting. (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
This is ready for review.
Recent discussions among LN devs have brought back on the surface concerns about the security of multi-party funded transactions against pinnings attacks and other mempool-based nuisances. The lack of full-rbf transaction-relay topology connected to miners open the way to cheap and naive DoS against multi-party funded transactions (e.g coinjoins, dual-funded channels, on-chain DLCs, ...) without solutions introducing an overhead cost or centralization vectors afaik . For more details, see [0].
This PR implements a simple `fullrbf` setting, where the node always allows transaction replacement, ignoring BIP125 opt-in flag. The default value of the setting stays **false**, therefore opt-in replacement is still the default Bitcoin Core replacement policy. Contrary to a previous proposal of mine and listening to feedbacks collected since then [1], I think this new setting simply offers more flexibility in a node transaction-relay policy suiting one's application requirements, without arguing a change of the default behavior.
I [posted](https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-June/020557.html) on the ML to invite operators with a bitcoin application sensitive to full-rbf (e.g dual-funded LN channels service providers) or mempool researchers to join a bootstrapped full-rbf activated peers network for experimentation and learning. If people have strong opinions against the existence of such full-rbf transaction-relay network, I'm proposing to express them on the future thread.
[0] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2021-May/003033.html
[1] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-June/019074.html
Follow-up suggestions :
- soft-enable opt-in RBF in the wallet : https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25353#issuecomment-1154918789
- p2p discovery and additional outbound connection to full-rbf peers : https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25353#issuecomment-1156044401
- match the code between RPC, wallet and mempool about disregard of inherited signaling : #22698
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK 4c9666bd73
glozow:
ACK 4c9666bd73, a few nits which are non-blocking.
w0xlt:
ACK 4c9666bd73
Tree-SHA512: 9e288bf22e06a9808804e58178444ef1830c3fdd42fd8a7cd7ffb101f8f586e08b000679be407d63ca76a56f7216227b368ff630c81f3fac3243db1a1202ab1c
This change eliminates memory usage spike when compiling with Visual
Studio 2022 (at least in Cirrus CI environment).
Easy to review using
`git diff --color-moved-ws=allow-indentation-change --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`
This change eliminates memory usage spike when compiling with Visual
Studio 2022 (at least in Cirrus CI environment).
Easy to review using
`git diff --color-moved-ws=allow-indentation-change --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`
This change eliminates memory usage spike when compiling with Visual
Studio 2022 (at least in Cirrus CI environment).
Easy to review using
`git diff --color-moved-ws=allow-indentation-change --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`
e734228d85 Update GCSFilter benchmarks (Calvin Kim)
aee9a8140b Add GCSFilterDecodeSkipCheck benchmark (Patrick Strateman)
299023c1d9 Add GCSFilterDecode and GCSBlockFilterGetHash benchmarks. (Patrick Strateman)
b0a53d50d9 Make sanity check in GCSFilter constructor optional (Patrick Strateman)
Pull request description:
This PR picks up the abandoned #19280
BlockFilterIndex was depending on `GolombRiceDecode()` during the filter decode to sanity check that the filter wasn't corrupt. However, we can check for corruption by ensuring that the encoded blockfilter's hash matches up with the one stored in the index database.
Benchmarks that were added in #19280 showed that checking the hash is much faster.
The benchmarks were changed to nanobench and the relevant benchmarks were like below, showing a clear win for the hash check method.
```
| ns/elem | elem/s | err% | ins/elem | bra/elem | miss% | total | benchmark
|--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------------:|---------------:|--------:|----------:|:----------
| 531.40 | 1,881,819.43 | 0.3% | 3,527.01 | 411.00 | 0.2% | 0.01 | `DecodeCheckedGCSFilter`
| 258,220.50 | 3,872.66 | 0.1% | 2,990,092.00 | 586,706.00 | 1.7% | 0.01 | `DecodeGCSFilter`
| 13,036.77 | 76,706.09 | 0.3% | 64,238.24 | 513.04 | 0.2% | 0.01 | `BlockFilterGetHash`
```
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK e734228d85
theStack:
Code-review ACK e734228d85
stickies-v:
ACK e734228d85
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK e734228d85, with caveat that I mostly paid attention to the main code, not the changes to the benchmark. Only changes since last review were changes to the benchmark code.
Tree-SHA512: 02b86eab7b554e1a57a15b17a4d6d71faa91b556c637b0da29f0c9ee76597a110be8e3b4d0c158d4cab04af0623de18b764837be0ec2a72afcfe1ad9c78a83c6
0101d2bc3c [net] Move eviction logic to its own file (dergoegge)
c741d748d4 [net] Move ConnectionType to its own file (Cory Fields)
a3c2707039 [net] Add connection type to NodeEvictionCandidate (dergoegge)
42aa5d5b62 [net] Add NoBan status to NodeEvictionCandidate (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
This PR splits of the first couple commits from #25268 that move the inbound eviction logic from `net.{h,cpp}` to `eviction.{h,cpp}`.
Please look at #25268 for motivation and conceptual review.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 0101d2bc3c
theuni:
utACK 0101d2bc3c. I quickly verified with `git --color-moved` that the move-only changes are indeed move-only.
Tree-SHA512: e0c345a698030e049cb22fe281b44503c04403c5be5a3750ca14bfcc603a162ac6bac9a39552472feb57c460102b7ca91430b8ad6268f2efccc49b5e8959331b
6eb0909cb7 fuzz: add low-level target for txorphanage (chinggg)
Pull request description:
This adds a low-level fuzz target for orphan transaction handling by creating random transactions and calling all functions in `TxOrphanage`.
It cannot simulate real-world `orphan/unorphan` scenarios effectively since it does not maintain any state about the node and the chain. A high-level fuzz target which construct well-designed transaction graphs will be added later.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 6eb0909cb7🐈
Tree-SHA512: b4d64f5941df77d13981f75ec170cef6ffabe782797c982ede7f34134be01dc0026dd7c0bee614bc1d64715e90a933d2a8c95974d402e32eaba8e24cc928299e
This new node policy setting enables to accept replaced-by-fee
transaction without inspection of the replaceability signaling
as described in BIP125 "explicit signaling".
If turns on, the node mempool accepts transaction replacement
as described in `policy/mempool-replacements.md`.
The default setting value is `false`, implying opt-in RBF
is enforced.
140d942634 wallet: don't add change fee to target if subtracting fees from output (S3RK)
Pull request description:
Change fee is payed by the recipient, so we don't need to add it to our target for coin selection.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 140d942634
ishaanam:
ACK 140d942634
furszy:
Code review ACK 140d9426
Tree-SHA512: b5efd0264c47ecee9204a3fd039bad24c69f9e614c6e1d9bb240ee5be6356b175aa074f3be123e6cfb8becd4d7bd1028eebe18801662cc69d19413d8d5a9dd5c
99f4785cad Replace GetTime() with NodeClock in MaybeSendGetHeaders() (Suhas Daftuar)
abf5d16c24 Don't send getheaders message when another request is outstanding (Suhas Daftuar)
ffe87db247 Cleanup received_new_header calculation to use WITH_LOCK (Suhas Daftuar)
6d95cd3e74 Move peer state updates from headers message into separate function (Suhas Daftuar)
2b341db731 Move headers direct fetch to end of ProcessHeadersMessage (Suhas Daftuar)
29c4518522 Move headers-direct-fetch logic into own function (Suhas Daftuar)
bf8ea6df75 Move additional headers fetching to own function (Suhas Daftuar)
9492e93bf9 Add helper function for checking header continuity (Suhas Daftuar)
7f2450871b Move handling of unconnecting headers into own function (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Change `getheaders` messages so that we wait up to 2 minutes for a response to a prior `getheaders` message before issuing a new one.
Also change the handling of the `getheaders` message sent in response to a block INV, so that we no longer use the hashstop variable (including the hash stop will just mean that if our peer's headers chain is longer, then we won't learn
it, so there's no benefit to using hashstop).
Also, now respond to a `getheaders` during IBD with an empty headers message (rather than nothing) -- this better conforms to the intent of the new logic that it's better to not ignore a peer's `getheaders` message, even if you have nothing to give. This also avoids a lot of functional tests breaking.
This PR also reworks the headers processing logic to make it more readable.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 99f4785cad ; code review, check over new logic of when to send getheaders messages
dergoegge:
Code review ACK 99f4785cad
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 99f4785cad
sipa:
utACK 99f4785cad
w0xlt:
tACK 99f4785cad Good improvement in the code.
Tree-SHA512: b8a63f6f71ac83e292edc0200def7835ad8b06b2955dd34e3ea6fac85980fa6962efd31d689ef5ea121ff5477ec14aafa4bbe2d0db134c05f4a31a57a8ced365
18f5355f3a Remove outdated comment (Igor Bubelov)
Pull request description:
Looks like this comment is no longer relevant, the last files which matched `index/*.cpp` pattern were removed in f100687566
ACKs for top commit:
dongcarl:
ACK 18f5355f3a
shaavan:
ACK 18f5355f3a
Tree-SHA512: d3fcc2db0940f81ce521fddff836f271709ea327c357942383f8aff6c7089e74490fa720e7a2916900215c733d2b64960c1aa185f0c9b1567fce90a249d405e0
27c8056885 rpc: Disallow gettxoutsetinfo queries for a specific block with use_index=false (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
In the `gettxoutsetinfo` RPC, if we set `use_index` to false but specify `hash_or_height`, we currently hit a nonfatal error, e.g. `gettxoutsetinfo "muhash" "1" "false"` results in:
```
Internal bug detected: "!pindex || pindex->GetBlockHash() == view->GetBestBlock()"
rpc/blockchain.cpp:836 (GetUTXOStats)
```
The failing check was added in [#24410](664a14ba7c), but the previous behavior, returning the specified height together with data corresponding to the tip's height, was very confusing too in my opinion.
Fix this by disallowing the interaction of `use_index=false` and `hash_or_height` and add a RPC help example with `-named` because users might ask themselves how to use the `use_index` flag witout hitting an error.
An alternative way would be to allow the interaction if the specified `hash_or_height` happens to correspond to the tip (which should then also be applied to the `HASH_SERIALIZED` check before). If reviewers would prefer that, please say so.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
utACK 27c8056885
shaavan:
ACK 27c8056885
Tree-SHA512: 1d81c34eaa48c86134a2cf7193246d5de6bfd819d413c3b3fae9cb9290e0297a336111eeaecede2f0f020b0f9a181d240de0da4493e1b387fe63b8189154442b
c318211ddd walletdb: fix last client version update (furszy)
bda8ebe608 wallet: don't read db every time that a new WalletBatch is created (furszy)
Pull request description:
Found it while was working on #25297.
We are performing a db read operation every time that a new `WalletBatch` is created, inside the constructor, just to check if the client version field is inside the db or not.
As the client version field does not change in the entire db lifecycle, this operation can be done only once: The first time that the db is accessed/opened and the client version value can be cached.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK c318211ddd
w0xlt:
reACK c318211ddd
Tree-SHA512: 7fb780c656e169e8eb21e7212242494a647f6506d6da2cca828703713d440d29c82bec9e7d2c410f37b49361226ccd80846d3eeb8168383d0c2a11d85d73bee2
e866f0d066 [functional test] submitrawpackage RPC (glozow)
fa076515b0 [rpc] add new submitpackage RPC (glozow)
Pull request description:
It would be nice for LN/wallet/app devs to test out package policy, package RBF, etc., but the only interface to do so right now is through unit tests. This PR adds a `-regtest` only RPC interface so people can test by submitting raw transaction data. It is regtest-only, as it would be unsafe/confusing to create an actual mainnet interface while package relay doesn't exist.
Note that the functional tests are there to ensure the RPC interface is working properly; they aren't for testing policy itself. See src/test/txpackage_tests.cpp.
ACKs for top commit:
t-bast:
Tested ACK against eclair e866f0d066
ariard:
Code Review ACK e866f0d0
instagibbs:
code review ACK e866f0d066
Tree-SHA512: 824a26b10d2240e0fd85e5dd25bf499ee3dd9ba8ef4f522533998fcf767ddded9f001f7a005fe3ab07ec95e696448484e26599803e6034ed2733125c8c376c84
Follow-up to #617. This applies translator strings to the
reset options confirmation dialog and also refactors the way we pass the
strings to the dialog in order to allow the comments to be applied.
Because the strings were being concatenated, we can not apply translator
comments to all of the relevant strings. What we want to do instead is
have a variable in which the translatable strings are appended to using
the QString append function. This satisfies the Qt translator engine and
the comments are then properly applied within the `extracomment` field
in the translation file.
