ea19cc844e wallet: refactor: dedup sqlite statement deletions (Sebastian Falbesoner)
9a3670930e wallet: refactor: dedup sqlite statement preparations (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This refactoring PR deduplicates repeated SQLite statement preparation calls (`sqlite3_prepare_v2(...)`) / deletions (`sqlite3_finalize(...)`) and its surrounding logic by putting each prepared statement and its corresponding text representation into a ~std::map~ ~`std::array`~ `std::vector`. This should be more readable and less error-prone, e.g. in case an additional statement needs to be added in the future or the error handling has to be adapted.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK ea19cc844e
meshcollider:
utACK ea19cc844e
Tree-SHA512: ced89869b2147e088e7a4cda2acbbdd4a806f66dbc2d6999953d0d702c0655aa53c0eb699cc7e5e3732f2d24206d577a9d9e1b5de7f439100dead2696ade1092
fa5eabe721 refactor: Remove negative lock annotations from globals (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
They only make sense for mutexes that are private members. Until cs_main is a private member the negative annotations should be replaced by excluded annotations, which are optional.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK fa5eabe721
ajtowns:
ACK fa5eabe721
hebasto:
ACK fa5eabe721
vasild:
ACK fa5eabe721
Tree-SHA512: 06f8a200304f81533010efcc42d9f59b8c4d0ae355920c0a28efb6fa161a3e3e68f2dfffb0c009afd9c2501e6a293c6e5a419a64d718f1f4e79668ab2ab1fcdc
This bug doesn't have any effects currently because it only affects
external signer RPCs which aren't currently using the wallet context,
but it does cause an appveyor failure in a upcoming PR:
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/DrahtBot/bitcoin/builds/38512882
This bug is subtle and could have been avoided if JSONRPCRequest didn't
have constructors that were so loose with type checking. Suggested
change
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21366#issuecomment-792044351
eliminates these and would be a good followup for a future PR.
2e5f7def22 wallet, rpc: update listdescriptors response format (Ivan Metlushko)
Pull request description:
Update `listdescriptors` response format according to [RPC interface guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/developer-notes.md#rpc-interface-guidelines).
This is a follow up for #20226
**Before:**
```
Result:
[ (json array) Response is an array of descriptor objects
{ (json object)
"desc" : "str", (string) Descriptor string representation
"timestamp" : n, (numeric) The creation time of the descriptor
"active" : true|false, (boolean) Activeness flag
"internal" : true|false, (boolean, optional) Whether this is internal or external descriptor; defined only for active descriptors
"range" : [ (json array, optional) Defined only for ranged descriptors
n, (numeric) Range start inclusive
n (numeric) Range end inclusive
],
"next" : n (numeric, optional) The next index to generate addresses from; defined only for ranged descriptors
},
...
]
```
**After:**
```
Result:
{ (json object)
"wallet_name" : "str", (string) Name of wallet this operation was performed on
"descriptors" : [ (json array) Array of descriptor objects
{ (json object)
"desc" : "str", (string) Descriptor string representation
"timestamp" : n, (numeric) The creation time of the descriptor
"active" : true|false, (boolean) Activeness flag
"internal" : true|false, (boolean, optional) Whether this is internal or external descriptor; defined only for active descriptors
"range" : [ (json array, optional) Defined only for ranged descriptors
n, (numeric) Range start inclusive
n (numeric) Range end inclusive
],
"next" : n (numeric, optional) The next index to generate addresses from; defined only for ranged descriptors
},
...
]
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 2e5f7def22
meshcollider:
utACK 2e5f7def22
jonatack:
re-ACK 2e5f7def22
Tree-SHA512: 49bf73e46e2a61003ce594a4bfc506eb9592ccb799c2909c43a1a527490a4b4009f78dc09f3d47b4e945d3d7bb3cd2632cf48c5ace5feed5066158cc010dddc1
1111896eb7 doc: Merge release notes (MarcoFalke)
faeba9819d rpc: Missing doc updates for bumpfee psbt update (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Stuff missed in #20891. Also merge release notes, so that it doesn't have to be done later.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 1111896eb7
Tree-SHA512: c9be5a3c944e2981c83546c4761277f1ad5fb9ba97bec80d073db4229924cb48fd23cb5638217c844e05af51d80507718dd201099cbe50819986b3c47c5df7e5
90ae3d8ca6 doc: Add release notes for -deprecatedrpc=addresses and bitcoin-tx (Michael Dietz)
085b3a7299 rpc: deprecate `addresses` and `reqSigs` from rpc outputs (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
Considering the limited applicability of `reqSigs` and the confusing output of `1` in all cases except bare multisig, the `addresses` and `reqSigs` outputs are removed for all rpc commands.
1) add a new sane "address" field (for outputs that have an identifiable address, which doesn't include bare multisig)
2) with -deprecatedrpc: leave "reqSigs" and "addresses" intact (with all weird/wrong behavior they have now)
3) without -deprecatedrpc: drop "reqSigs" and "addresses" entirely always.
Note: Some light refactoring done to allow us to very easily delete a few chunks of code (marked with TODOs) when we remove this deprecated behavior.
Using `IsDeprecatedRPCEnabled` in core_write.cpp caused some circular dependencies involving core_io
Circular dependencies were caused by rpc/util unnecessarily importing node/coinstats and node/transaction. Really what rpc/util needs are some fundamental type/helper-function definitions. So this was cleaned up to make more sense.
This fixes#20102.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 90ae3d8ca6📢
Tree-SHA512: 8ffb617053b5f4a8b055da17c06711fd19632e0037d71c4c8135e50c8cd7a19163989484e4e0f17a6cc48bd597f04ecbfd609aef54b7d1d1e76a784214fcf72a
1) add a new sane "address" field (for outputs that have an
identifiable address, which doesn't include bare multisig)
2) with -deprecatedrpc: leave "reqSigs" and "addresses" intact
(with all weird/wrong behavior they have now)
3) without -deprecatedrpc: drop "reqSigs" and "addresses" entirely,
always.
ebc4ab721b refactor: post Optional<> removal cleanups (fanquake)
57e980d13c scripted-diff: remove Optional & nullopt (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Same rationale & motivation as #21404, which turned out to be quite low in the number of potential conflicts. Lets see what the bot has to say here.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK ebc4ab721b: patch looks correct
jnewbery:
utACK ebc4ab721b
laanwj:
Code review ACK ebc4ab721b
Tree-SHA512: 550fbeef09b9d35ddefaa805d1755c18c8fd499c4b0f77ebfece8c20296a7abd1cf6c699e2261f92fe3552deeb7555ec2a2287ffe3ab9e98bb9f8612a4d43be3
57ff5a42ab doc: specify minimum HWI version (Sjors Provoost)
03308b2bfa rpc: don't require wallet for enumeratesigners (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
HWI just released 2.0. See https://github.com/bitcoin-core/HWI/releases/tag/2.0.0
As of #16546 we already rely on features that are in 2.0 and not in the previous 1.* releases:
* `--chain` param
This shouldn't be a problem, because HWI 2.0 has been released before we release v22.
Misc improvements:
* document that HWI 2.0 is required
* drop wallet requirement for `enumeratesigners`
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Code Review ACK 57ff5a42ab
Tree-SHA512: 3fb6ba20894e52a116f89525a5f5a1f61d363ccd904e1cffd0e6d095640fc6d2edf0388cd6ae20f83bbc31e5f458255ec090b6e823798d426eba3e45b4336bf9
f9cd2bfbcc Rename CoinSelectionParams::effective_fee to m_effective_feerate (Andrew Chow)
bdd0c2934b wallet: Move discard feerate fetching to CreateTransaction (Andrew Chow)
448d04b931 wallet: Move long term feerate setting to CreateTransaction (Andrew Chow)
e2f429e6bb wallet: Replace nFeeRateNeeded with effective_fee (Andrew Chow)
1a6a0b0dfb wallet: Use existing feerate instead of getting a new one (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
During coin selection, there are various places where we need to have a feerate. We need the feerate for the transaction itself, the discard fee rate, and long term feerate. Fetching these each time we need them can lead to a race condition where two feerates that should be the same are actually different. One particular instance where this can happen is during the loop in `CreateTransactionInternal`. After inputs are chosen, the expected transaction fee is calculated using a newly fetched feerate. If `pick_new_inputs == false`, the loop will go again with the assumption that the fee for the transaction remains the same. However because the feerate is fetched again, it is possible that it actually isn't and this causes coin selection to fail.
Instead of fetching the feerate each time it is needed, we fetch them all at once at the top of `CreateTransactionInternal`, store them in `CoinSelectionParams`, and use them where needed.
While some of these fee rates probably don't need this caching, I've done it for consistency and the guarantee that they remain the same.
Fixes#19229
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
reACK f9cd2bfbcc
fjahr:
Code review re-ACK f9cd2bfbcc
Xekyo:
tACK f9cd2bfbcc
meshcollider:
Code review + test run ACK f9cd2bfbcc
Tree-SHA512: be83ff64ba473c3cdd3469c812e214659b6e2a9584c22ed2b1595618fce0d4b35d0901e61068cd1069fc1a8fb911db01dd7312d05c3b8cbafbe2504ab7a3e863
Instead of fetching the discard feerate for each SelectCoinsMinConf
iteration, fetch and cache it once during CreateTransaction so that it
is shared for each SelectCoinsMinConf through
coin_selection_params.m_discard_feerate.
Does not change behavior.
Instead of setting the long term feerate for each SelectCoinsMinConf
iteration, set it once during CreateTransaction and let it be shared
with each SelectCoinsMinConf through
coin_selection_params.m_long_term_feerate.
Does not change behavior.
Make sure that all fee calculations use the same feerate.
coin_selection_params.effective_fee is the variable we use for all fee
calculations, so get rid of remaining nFeeRateNeeded usages and just
directly set coin_selection_params.effective_fee.
Does not change behavior.
During each loop of CreateTransaction, instead of constantly getting a
new feerate, use the feerate that we have already fetched for all
fee calculations. Thix fixes a race condition where the feerate required
changes during each iteration of the loop.
This commit changes behavior as the "Fee estimation failed" error will
now take priority over "Signing transaction failed".
9048c58e10 Remove pointer cast in CRPCTable::dumpArgMap (Russell Yanofsky)
14f3d9b908 refactor: Add RPC server ExecuteCommands function (Russell Yanofsky)
6158a6d397 refactor: Replace JSONRPCRequest fHelp field with mode field (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This change is needed to fix the `rpc_help.py` test failing in #10102: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5469433013469184?command=ci#L2275
The [`CRPCTable::dumpArgMap`](16b784d953/src/rpc/server.cpp (L492)) method currently works by casting RPC `unique_id` integer field to a function pointer, and then calling it. The `unique_id` field wasn't supposed to be used this way (it's meant to be used to detect RPC aliases) and as a result, this code segfaults in the `rpc_help.py` test in multiprocess PR #10102 because wallet RPC functions aren't directly accessible from the node process.
Fix this by adding a new `GET_ARGS` RPC request mode to retrieve argument information similar to the way the `GET_HELP` mode retrieves help information.
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 9048c58e10👑
Tree-SHA512: cd1a01c1daa5bde2c2455b63548371ee4cf39688313969ad2016d9a0fd4344102e3fd43034058f253364518e9632d57cf21abffad0d6a2c0c94b7a6921cbe615
7c90c67b7e rpc: refactor rpc wallet functions to take references instead of pointers (fanquake)
4866934008 rpc: remove calls to CWallet.get() (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This is a rebased #18592.
> This PR replaces raw pointers in `rpcwallet.cpp` and `rpcdump.cpp` with **shared_ptr**. The motivation for this PR is described here https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18590
> It seems that this PR is indirectly related to this issue: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13063#discussion_r186740049
> Notice: I have deliberately **not** changed the class `WalletRescanReserver ` whose constructor expects a raw pointer, because it's external and affects other areas, which I didn't touch to avoid making this PR "viral".
> Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18590
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 7c90c67b7e🐧
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 7c90c67b7e. Changes easy to review with `--word-diff-regex=. -U0`
Tree-SHA512: 32d69c813026b02260e8a89de9d6a5ab9e87826ba230687246583ac7a80c8c3fd00318da4658f1450e04c23d2c77ae765862de0d2a110b1312b3b69a1161e7ba
fa4e088cba wallet: Mark replaced tx to not be in the mempool anymore (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The wallet does not mark the replaced tx as out-of-mempool. This causes failures in user scripts, because later RPCs may depend on this state change from `bumpfee`.
For example, the following might fail on current master:
```
txid = sendtoaddress(...)
bumpfee(txid)
abandontransaction(txid) # fails because txid is still marked as "in mempool"
```
Fixes#18831
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
utACK fa4e088cba
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa4e088cba, and previous ACK faeedff5c87091fd83d2fb2b29eb49c948363f29 is also still valid in case there's a preference for the original fix
Tree-SHA512: 9858f40f5fb5a43a7b584b5c4268b6befa82e6a84583be5206fe721bcb6c255e8d35479d347d0b9aed72703df49887c02b14ab680e8efdd28b90dd6b93d9439a
48a0319bab Add a test that selects too large if BnB is used (Andrew Chow)
3e69939b78 Fail if maximum weight is too large (Andrew Chow)
51e2cd322c Have CalculateMaximumSignedTxSize also compute tx weight (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently the `Transaction too large` is calculated on the transaction that is returned from `CreateTransaction`. This does not make sense for when `CreateTransaction` is being used for `fundrawtransaction` as no signing occurs so the final returned transaction is missing signatures. Thus users may successfully fund a transaction but fail to broadcast it after it has been fully signed.
So instead we should figure out whether the transaction we are funding will be too large after it is signed. We can do this by having `CalculateMaximumSignedTxSize` also return the transaction weight and then comparing that weight against the maximum weight.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 48a0319bab
meshcollider:
utACK 48a0319bab
Xekyo:
utACK with nits 48a0319bab
Tree-SHA512: 1700c60b07f67e2d5c591c5ccd131ac9f1861fab3def961c3c9c4b3281ec1063fe8e4f0f7f1038cac72692340856406bcee8fb45c8104d2ad34357a0ec878ac7
This simplifies code and adds a less cumbersome interface for accessing
address used information than CWallet AddDestData / EraseDestData /
GetDestData methods.
There is no change in behavior. Lower-level walletdb DestData methods
are also still available and not affected by this change. If there is
interest in consolidating destdata logic more and making it internal to
walletdb, #18608 could be considered as a followup.
Stop giving GUI access to destdata rows in database. Replace with narrow
API just for saving and reading receive request information.
This simplifies code and should prevent the GUI from interfering with
other destdata like address-used status.
Note: No user-visible behavior is changing in this commit. New
CWallet::SetAddressReceiveRequest() implementation avoids a bug in
CWallet::AddDestData() where a modification would leave the previous
value in memory while writing the new value to disk. But it doesn't
matter because the GUI doesn't currently expose the ability to modify
receive requests, only to add and erase them.
