4b656b9ed3 build: remove unused libevent cppflags (fanquake)
afce044bb6 build: remove unused natpmp / upnp cppflags (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Their inclusion is likely just the result of copy-paste.
The only place upnp & natpmp CPPFLAGS should be used is [`libbitcoin_node` (mapport.cpp)](13fd9ee5c2/src/Makefile.am (L352)).
ACKs for top commit:
theuni:
ACK 4b656b9ed3
hebasto:
ACK 4b656b9ed3, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 800daeb06ddcbade3a862ca939a8cf87dc36282ed4fe9dc256d17b78a8751e2e08799788dc449046e1d875f93372912269d3ffcb5702628a41648794df32e887
By throwing a custom exception from `Univalue::checkType` (instead of a plain
std::runtime_error) and catching it on the RPC server request handler.
So we properly return RPC_TYPE_ERROR (-3) on arg type errors and
not the general RPC_MISC_ERROR (-1).
and also fix spelling in test/lint/lint-locale-dependence.py not caught by the
spelling linter and fix up a paragraph we are touching here in test/README.md.
The `sendall` RPC doesn't use `CreateTransactionInternal`as the rest of
the wallet RPCs and it never checks against the tx-size mempool limit.
Add a check for tx-size as well as test coverage for that case.
6f8e3818af sendall: check if the maxtxfee has been exceeded (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
Previously the `sendall` RPC didn't check whether the fees of the transaction it creates exceed the set `maxtxfee`. This PR adds this check to `sendall` and a test case for it.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 6f8e3818af
Xekyo:
ACK 6f8e3818af
glozow:
Concept ACK 6f8e3818af. The high feerate is unlikely but sendall should respect the existing wallet options.
Tree-SHA512: 6ef0961937091293d49be16f17e4451cff3159d901c0c7c6e508883999dfe0c20ed4d7126bf74bfea8150d4c1eef961a45f0c28ef64562e6cb817fede2319f1a
There are many cases where we assume message processing is
single-threaded in order for how we access node-related memory to be
safe. Add an explicit mutex that we can use to document this, which allows
the compiler to catch any cases where we try to access that memory from
other threads and break that assumption.
b00fc44ca5 test: add coverage for 'add_inputs' dynamic default value (furszy)
ddbcfdf3d0 RPC: bugfix, 'add_inputs' default value is true unless 'inputs' are provided (furszy)
Pull request description:
This bugfix was meant to be in #25685, but decoupled it to try to make it part of 24.0 release.
It's a truly misleading functionality.
This PR doesn't change behavior in any way. Just fixes two invalid RPC help messages and adds test
coverage for the current behavior.
#### Description
In both RPC commands `send()` and `walletcreatefundedpsbt` the help message says
that `add_inputs` default value is false when it's actually dynamically set by the following statement:
```c++
coin_control.m_allow_other_inputs = rawTx.vin.size() == 0;
```
Which means that, by default, `add_inputs` is true unless there is any pre-set input, in which
case, the default is false.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK b00fc44ca5
S3RK:
ACK b00fc44ca5
Tree-SHA512: 5c68a40d81c994e0ab6de0817db69c4d3dea3a9a64a60362531bf583b7a4c37d524b740905a3f3a89cdbf221913ff5b504746625adb8622788aea93a35bbcd40
6725030e41 qt: Update translation source file for string freeze (round 2) (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On the day of [translation string freeze](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24987#issuecomment-1234026641), it happened that bitcoin-core/gui#660 did not include new strings from bitcoin/bitcoin#19602.
This PR includes all recent updates.
As a Transifex translator, I believe it is enough time for all translators to handle a few new strings by a release date. Also a Transifex check failure has been [fixed](bitcoin-core/gui/pull/664).
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 6725030e41
Tree-SHA512: d57b841e87e389d31ec4ae9067b83f7f209e168399bc088c3234c2c66b34772739cb801f04b5038d55de115083d022d603bc976374bfd537b8ea10c10a545183
Covered cases for send() and walletcreatefundedpsbt() RPC commands:
1. Default add_inputs value with no preset inputs (add_inputs=true):
Expect: automatically add coins from the wallet to the tx.
2. Default add_inputs value with preset inputs (add_inputs=false):
Expect: disallow automatic coin selection.
3. Explicit add_inputs=true and preset inputs (with preset inputs not-covering the target amount).
Expect: include inputs from the wallet.
4. Explicit add_inputs=true and preset inputs (with preset inputs covering the target amount).
Expect: only preset inputs are used.
5. Explicit add_inputs=true, no preset inputs (same as (1) but with an explicit set):
Expect: include inputs from the wallet.
8ed2b72767 qt: Prevent wrong handling of `%2` token by Transifex (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On master (124e75a41e), Transifex translation check fails for 124e75a41e/src/qt/forms/intro.ui (L206) with a message:
> The expression '%2G' is not present in the translation.
In "Organization Settings" --> ["Translation checks"](https://www.transifex.com/bitcoin/settings/validations/) I have changed the status of the "**Variable substitution specifiers (like "%s") are preserved in the translations.**" check from "error" to "warning" temporarily. This setting should be reverted after applying this PR change.
[Noted](https://www.transifex.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/translate/#ru/qt-translation-024x/436102928/) by Transifex user [AHOHNMYC](https://www.transifex.com/user/profile/AHOHNMYC/).
I faced the same issue while working on Ukrainian translation.
ACKs for top commit:
katesalazar:
ACK 8ed2b72767
jarolrod:
ACK 8ed2b72767
Tree-SHA512: 304f795ac9241ac8453c614ed18d967226d9d515f9ea079b51af5bcbe2f0760ca7dcaea5efb38207720cb7a18159c2bcd337b961bc522a128715c70e0db81061
34a2f91055 Revert "doc: note that brew installed qt is not supported" (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
As bitcoin/bitcoin#26056fixesbitcoin/bitcoin#25947 it looks reasonable to revert bitcoin/bitcoin#21988.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 34a2f91055 - haven't tested at all.
jarolrod:
ACK 34a2f91055
Tree-SHA512: 4470f21fb6ea32970d7572c83ba064bcbe6e3282cea79122312f8ac203a5b1617b21952db1d6e47ba5b6f605abc23f72c04c07cef7251272e22fb593ff317beb
The template parameter `typename Base = typename Mutex::UniqueLock` is
not used, so remove it. Use internally defined type `Base` to avoid
repetitions of `Mutex::UniqueLock`.
0f0cc05e4c refactor: Remove trailing semicolon from LOCK2 (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
Macros should not have a trailing semi-colon to avoid empty statements when using them with another semi-colon.
Noticed this while reviewing a PR.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK 0f0cc05e4c
Tree-SHA512: 97fa4d89f5131ac30e05b293f750b757d5526feed56885c6feeb403b3ac3d3d3205874bc507c3b56a8296a6e3bdc8d879b2c339784f1e6ab1963d1b8a8d7b02f
Since it is now a string_view instead of a const char*, update the
name to reflect that the variable is no longer a "Pointer to
String, Zero-terminated" (psz).
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i s/pszThread/thread_name/ $(git grep -l pszThread src)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Rather than including validation.h, which ultimately means needing boost
via txmempool.h, include primitives/block.h for CBlock, and remove
validation.h, as we can get cs_main from node/blockstorage.h.
The only reason BOOST_CPPFLAGS is needed here, is because of the
policy/rbf.h include, which ultimately includes boost multi_index
via txmempool.h. However this include is actually unused.
In both RPC commands `send()` and `walletcreatefundedpsbt` the RPC help was saying
that `add_inputs` default value was false when it's actually dynamically set
by the following statement:
`coin_control.m_allow_other_inputs = rawTx.vin.size() == 0;`
Which means that, by default, `add_inputs` is true unless there
was any pre-set input, in which case, the default is false.
in TestingSetup(). This is used in the following commit to test
reinitializing chainstates after snapshot validation and cleanup.
Best reviewed with `git diff --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`.
This CreateAndActivateUTXOSnapshot parameter is necessary once we
perform snapshot completion within ABC, since the existing UpdateTip
test will fail because the IBD chain that has generated the snapshot
will exceed the base of the snapshot.
Being able to test snapshots being loaded into a mostly-uninitialized
datadir allows for more realistic unittest scenarios.
If we call FlushBlockFile() without having intitialized the block index
with LoadBlockIndexDB(), we may be indexing into an empty vector.
Specifically this is an issue when we call MaybeRebalanceCaches() during
chainstate init before the block index has been loaded, which calls
FlushBlockFile().
Also add an assert to avoid undefined behavior.
Co-authored-by: Russell Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>
If a UTXO snapshot fails to validate, don't leave the resulting datadir
on disk as this will confuse initialization on next startup and we'll
get an assertion error.
Used in later commits to remove leveldb directories for
- invalid snapshot chainstates, and
- background-vaildation chainstates that have finished serving their
purpose.
Add functionality for activating a snapshot-based chainstate if one is
detected on-disk.
Also cautiously initialize chainstate cache usages so that we don't
somehow blow past our cache allowances during initialization, then
rebalance at the end of init.
Co-authored-by: Russell Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>
This changes the snapshot's leveldb chainstate dir name from
`chainstate_[blockhash]` to `chainstate_snapshot`. This simplifies
later logic that loads snapshot data, and enforces the limitation
of a single snapshot at any given time.
Since we still need to persis the blockhash of the base block, we
write that out to a file (`chainstate_snapshot/base_blockhash`) for
later use during initialization, so that we can reinitialize the
snapshot chainstate.
Co-authored-by: Russell Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>
