BIP 130 (sendheaders) and BIP 152 (compact blocks) do not specify at
which stage the `sendheaders` or `sendcmpct` messages should be sent.
Therefore we should tolerate them being sent before the version-verack
handshake is complete.
7fabe0f359 net: don't relay to the address' originator (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
For each address to be relayed we "randomly" pick 2 nodes to send the
address to (in `RelayAddress()`). However we do not take into
consideration that it does not make sense to relay the address back to
its originator (`CNode::PushAddress()` will do nothing in that case).
This means that if the originator is among the "randomly" picked nodes,
then we will relay to one node less than intended.
Fix this by skipping the originating node when choosing candidates to
relay to.
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
ACK 7fabe0f359 (this time I looked at the test, and verified the test breaks in expected ways if I break the code).
jnewbery:
utACK 7fabe0f359 (only net_processing changes. I haven't reviewed the test changes)
jonatack:
re-ACK 7fabe0f359 per `git range-diff b76abae fd897f8 7fabe0f`, change since last review is rebase and more readable Doxygen documentation
Tree-SHA512: c6a9d11c7afc97ab4e8960513f6416648d4a8c0c64b713c145a7482a7b9e54946f81386a3351e3ec0011e5594ba5ccff4d10c6f656bb80680d9f0d0a63366165
f6360088de [net processing] Clarify UpdatedBlockTip() (John Newbery)
94d2cc35be [net processing] Remove unnecesary nNewHeight variable in UpdatedBlockTip() (John Newbery)
8b57013473 [net processing] Remove nStartingHeight check from block relay (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
nStartingHeight was introduced in commit 7a47324c7 (Bitcoin version
0.2.9, P2P version 209) with the comment "better prevention of inventory
relaying during initial download". At that time, there was no function
to determine whether the node was still in Initial Block Download, so to
prevent syncing nodes from relaying old blocks to their peers, a check
was added to never relay a block to a peer where the height was lower
than 2000 less than the peer's best block. That check was updated
several times in later commits to ensure that we weren't relaying blocks
before the latest checkpoint if the peer didn't provide a
startingheight. The checkpoint comparison was changed to compare with an
estimate of the highest block in commit eae82d8e.
In commit 202e0194, all block relay was gated on being out of Initial
Block Download. In commit 0278fb5f, the comparison to nBlockEstimate was
removed since "we already checked IsIBD()".
We can remove the check against nStartingHeight entirely. If the node is
out of Initial Block Download, then its tip height must have been within
24 hours of current time, so should not be more than ~144 blocks behind
the most work tip.
This simplifies moving block inventory state into the `Peer` object (#19829).
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK f636008
jonatack:
ACK f6360088de
MarcoFalke:
ACK f6360088de💽
ariard:
Code Review ACK f636008
Tree-SHA512: 4959cf35f1dcde46f34bffec1375729a157e1b2a1fd8a8ca33da9771c3c89a6c43e7050cdeeab8d90bb507b0795703db8c8bc304a1a5065ef00aae7a6992ca4f
4b7b58b3fe Update net_processing WTXID documentation per BIP339 (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
BIP339 currently states:
*The wtxidrelay message MUST be sent in response to a version message from a peer whose protocol version is >= 70016 and prior to sending a verack. A wtxidrelay message received after a verack message MUST be ignored or treated as invalid.*
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 4b7b58b3fe
practicalswift:
ACK 4b7b58b3fe
RiccardoMasutti:
ACK 4b7b58b
Tree-SHA512: 58ca6b197618cc73c70aa5de0a2d9d89a68b4cad9d5a708278ef17a9d6854d4362bcc384b6d29696642924977204a8fc120b31e91e2d97b6072b7b0d41c9f2dc
a33442fdc7 Remove m_is_manual_connection from CNodeState (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
Currently, this member is only used to exclude MANUAL peers from discouragement
in MaybePunishNodeForBlock(). Manual connections are already protected in
MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect(), independently from their network
processing behaviors.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK a33442fdc7
promag:
Code review ACK a33442fdc7.
jnewbery:
utACK a33442fdc7
amitiuttarwar:
code review ACK a33442fdc7
Tree-SHA512: cfe3f3dfa131373e3299002d34ae9e22ca6e1a966831bab32fcf06ff1d08f06095b4ab020cc4d267f3ec05ae23fbdc22373382ab828b999c0db11b8c842a4f0c
faaad1bbac p2p: Ignore version msgs after initial version msg (MarcoFalke)
fad68afcff p2p: Ignore non-version msgs before version msg (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Handshake misbehaviour doesn't cost us more than any other unknown message, so it seems odd to treat it differently
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK faaad1bbac
practicalswift:
ACK faaad1bbac: patch looks correct
Tree-SHA512: 9f30c3b5c1f6604fd02cff878f10999956152419a3dd9825f8267cbdeff7d06787418b41c7fde8a00a5e557fe89204546e05d5689042dbf7b07fbb7eb95cddff
nStartingHeight was introduced in commit 7a47324c7 (Bitcoin version
0.2.9, P2P version 209) with the comment "better prevention of inventory
relaying during initial download". At that time, there was no function
to determine whether the node was still in Initial Block Download, so to
prevent syncing nodes from relaying old blocks to their peers, a check
was added to never relay a block to a peer where the height was lower
than 2000 less than the peer's best block. That check was updated
several times in later commits to ensure that we weren't relaying blocks
before the latest checkpoint if the peer didn't provide a
startingheight. The checkpoint comparison was changed to compare with an
estimate of the highest block in commit eae82d8e.
In commit 202e0194, all block relay was gated on being out of Initial
Block Download. In commit 0278fb5f, the comparison to nBlockEstimate was
removed since "we already checked IsIBD()".
We can remove the check against nStartingHeight entirely. If the node is
out of Initial Block Download, then its tip height must have been within
24 hours of current time, so should not be more than ~144 blocks behind
the most work tip.
Currently, this member is only used to exclude MANUAL peers from discouragement
in MaybePunishNodeForBlock(). Manual connections are already protected in
MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect(), independently from their network
processing behaviors.
To make eclipse attacks more difficult, regularly initiate outbound connections
and stay connected long enough to sync headers and potentially learn of new
blocks. If we learn a new block, rotate out an existing block-relay peer in
favor of the new peer.
This augments the existing outbound peer rotation that exists -- currently we
make new full-relay connections when our tip is stale, which we disconnect
after waiting a small time to see if we learn a new block. As block-relay
connections use minimal bandwidth, we can make these connections regularly and
not just when our tip is stale.
Like feeler connections, these connections are not aggressive; whenever our
timer fires (once every 5 minutes on average), we'll try to initiate a new
block-relay connection as described, but if we fail to connect we just wait for
our timer to fire again before repeating with a new peer.
For each address to be relayed we "randomly" pick 2 nodes to send the
address to (in `RelayAddress()`). However we do not take into
consideration that it does not make sense to relay the address back to
its originator (`CNode::PushAddress()` will do nothing in that case).
This means that if the originator is among the "randomly" picked nodes,
then we will relay to one node less than intended.
Fix this by skipping the originating node when choosing candidates to
relay to.
343dc4760f test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583307 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f8bb rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fab68 net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Fixes#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png). The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
* on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
* after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)
Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
reACK 343dc4760f
jonatack:
re-ACK 343dc4760f per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`
Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
fa11110bff util: Allow use of C++14 chrono literals (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
I think we should allow the use of chrono literals for new code to make it less verbose. Obviously old code can stay as-is.
This patch pulls in the needed namespace and replaces some lines for illustrative purposes.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK fa11110bff
jonatack:
ACK fa11110bff
Tree-SHA512: ee2b72c8f28dee07b33b9a8ee8f7c87c0bc43b05c56a17b786cf9803ef204c7628e01b02de1af1a4eb01f5cdf6fc336f69c2833e17acd606ebda20ac6917e6bb
3025ca9e77 [net processing] Add RemovePeer() (John Newbery)
a20ab22786 [net processing] Make GetPeerRef const (John Newbery)
ed7e469cee [net_processing] Move peer_map to PeerManager (John Newbery)
a529fd3e3f [net processing] Move GetNodeStateStats into PeerManager (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This moves `g_peer_map` from a global in net_processing.cpp's unnamed namespace to being a member `m_peer_map` of `PeerManager`.
ACKs for top commit:
theuni:
Re-ACK 3025ca9e77.
dongcarl:
Re-ACK 3025ca9
hebasto:
re-ACK 3025ca9e77, since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19910#pullrequestreview-545574237) review only reverted the change that introduced NRVO in `PeerManager::GetPeerRef`, and comments are fixed in the proper commits.
Tree-SHA512: 6369eb3c688ac5b84f89f7674115f78ff02edbed76063ac2ebb1759894c9e973883e10821a35dab92bd3d738280acc095bd5368f552a060b83cd309330387d47
1583498fb6 Send and require SENDADDRV2 before VERACK (Pieter Wuille)
c5a8919660 Don't send 'sendaddrv2' to pre-70016 software (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
BIP155 defines addrv2 and sendaddrv2 for all protocol versions, but some implementations reject messages they don't know. As a courtesy, don't send it to nodes with a version before 70016, as no software is known to support BIP155 that doesn't announce at least that protocol version number.
Also move the sending of sendaddrv2 earlier (before sending verack), as proposed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1043. This has the side effect that local address broadcast of torv3 will work (as it'll only trigger after we know whether or not the peer supports addrv2).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 1583498fb6
jnewbery:
ACK 1583498fb6
jonatack:
ACK 1583498fb6
vasild:
ACK 1583498
Tree-SHA512: 3bd5833fa8c8567b6dedd99e4a9b6bb71c127aa66d5284b217503c86d597dc59aa7382c41f3a4bf561bb658b89db81d1a7703a700eef4ffc17cb916660e23a82
65273fa0e7 Clear m_addr_known before our periodic self-advertisement (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
We use a rolling bloom filter to track which addresses we've previously sent a peer, but after #7125 we no longer clear it every day before our own announcement. This looks to me like an oversight which has the effect of reducing the frequency with which we actually self-announce our own address, so this reintroduces resetting that filter.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 65273fa0e7
laanwj:
Code review ACK 65273fa0e7
sipa:
utACK 65273fa0e7
Tree-SHA512: 602c155fb6d2249b054fcb6f1c0dd17143605ceb87132286bbd90babf26d258ff6c41f9925482c17e2be41805d33f9b83926cb447f394969ffecd4bccfa0a64f
as BIP339 currently states:
"The wtxidrelay message MUST be sent in response to a version
message from a peer whose protocol version is >= 70016 and
prior to sending a verack. A wtxidrelay message received after
a verack message MUST be ignored or treated as invalid."
1816327e53 p2p: Put disconnecting logs into BCLog::NET category (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
It's too noisy:
```
$ cat debug.log | wc -l
28529
$ cat debug.log | grep "Disconnecting and discouraging peer" | wc -l
10177
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
noban, addnode and local peers are still unconditionally logged (as they should), but this one can go into a category, so cr-ACK 1816327e53
practicalswift:
ACK 1816327e53 for the reasons MarcoFalke gave above.
ajtowns:
ACK 1816327e53
Tree-SHA512: c312c1009090840659b2cb1364d8ad9b6ab8e742fc462aef169996d93c76c248507639a00257ed9d73a6916c01176b1793491b2305e92fdded5f9de0935b6ba6
This behavior was apparently inadvertently broken in 5400ef6; without this
change our daily self-announcements frequently go unsent, because our
address is still in the peer's rolling bloom filter (for potentially many
days, depending on addr traffic).
0bfce9dc46 [addrman] Fix Connected() comment (John Newbery)
eefe194718 [net] Consolidate logic around calling CAddrMan::Connected() (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Currently, the logic around whether we called CAddrMan::Connected() for
a peer is spread between verack processing (where we discard inbound
peers) and FinalizeNode (where we discard misbehaving and
block-relay-only peers). Consolidate that logic to a single place.
Also remove the CNode.fCurrentlyConnected bool, which is now
redundant. We can rely on CNode.fSuccessfullyConnected, since the two
bools were only ever flipped to true in the same place.
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code review ACK 0bfce9dc46
amitiuttarwar:
code review ACK 0bfce9dc46. nice tidy, and bonus that we get to remove an unnecessary call to `cs_main`
Tree-SHA512: 1ab74dae3bc12a6846da57c853033e546bb4f91caa39f4c50bf0cf7eca59cb917bdb2ef795da55363e7e9f70949cb28bb3be004cb3afa4389f970d2fe097d932
Sending a version message after the intial version message is peer
misbehavior. Though, it seems arbitrary and confusing to disconnect only
after exactly 100 version messages. Duplicate version messages affect us
no different than any other unknown message. So remove the Misbehaving
and ignore the redundant msgs.
Sending a non-version message before the initial version message is peer
misbehavior. Though, it seems arbitrary and confusing to disconnect only
after exactly 100 non-version messages. So remove the Misbehaving and
instead rely on the existing disconnect-due-to-handshake-timeout logic.
af3b0dfc54 net: fix output of peer address in version message (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
If `-logips -debug=net` is specified then we print the contents of the
version message we send to the peer, including his address. Because the
addresses in the version message use pre-BIP155 encoding they cannot
represent a Tor v3 address and we would actually send 16 `0`s instead (a
dummy IPv6 address). However we would print the full address in the log
message. Before this fix:
```
2020-10-21T12:24:17Z send version message: version 70016, blocks=653500, us=[::]:0, them=xwjtp3mj427zdp4tljiiivg2l5ijfvmt5lcsfaygtpp6cw254kykvpyd.onion:8333, peer=0
```
This is confusing because we pretend to send one thing while we actually
send another. Adjust the printout to reflect what we are sending. After
this fix:
```
2020-10-21T12:26:54Z send version message: version 70016, blocks=653500, us=[::]:0, them=[::]:0, peer=0
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK af3b0dfc54
jnewbery:
utACK af3b0dfc54
Tree-SHA512: f169d7b4f07c219e541f7c37ea23b82c77e50085fc72ec62f1dd46970389916e177268d07d45c7be94dd209d1903f8f23eaff62b7fa782f6057dd36bb96bba82
Currently, the logic around whether we called CAddrMan::Connected() for
a peer is spread between verack processing (where we discard inbound
peers) and FinalizeNode (where we discard misbehaving and
block-relay-only peers). Consolidate that logic to a single place.
Also remove the CNode.fCurrentlyConnected bool, which is now
redundant. We can rely on CNode.fSuccessfullyConnected, since the two
bools were only ever flipped to true in the same place.
16d9bfc417 Avoid test-before-evict evictions of current peers (Suhas Daftuar)
e8b215a086 Refactor test for existing peer connection into own function (Suhas Daftuar)
4fe338ab3e Call CAddrMan::Good() on block-relay-only peer addresses (Suhas Daftuar)
daf5553126 Avoid calling CAddrMan::Connected() on block-relay-only peer addresses (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
This PR does two things:
* Block-relay-only interaction with addrman.
* Calling `CAddrMan::Connected()` on an address that was a block-relay-only peer causes the time we report in `addr` messages containing that peer to be updated; particularly now that we use anchor connections with a our block-relay-only peers, this risks leaking information about those peers. So, stop this.
* Avoiding calling `CAddrMan::Good()` on block-relay-only peer addresses causes the addrman logic around maintaining the new and tried table to be less good, and in particular makes it so that block-relay-only peer addresses are more likely to be evicted from the addrman (for no good reason I can think of). So, mark those addresses as good when we connect.
* Fix test-before-evict bug. There's a bug where if we get a collision in the tried table with an existing address that is one of our current peers, and the connection is long-lived enough, then `SelectTriedCollisions()` might return that existing peer address to us as a test-before-evict connection candidate. However, our logic for new outbound connections would later prevent us from actually making a connection; the result would be that when we get a collision with a long-lived current peer, that peer's address is likely to get evicted from the tried table. Fix this by checking to see if a test-before-evict candidate is a peer we're currently connected to, and if so, mark it as `Good()`.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 16d9bfc417
amitiuttarwar:
code review ACK 16d9bfc417
mzumsande:
Code-Review ACK 16d9bfc417.
jnewbery:
utACK 16d9bfc417
ariard:
Code Review ACK 16d9bfc.
jonatack:
Tested ACK 16d9bfc417
Tree-SHA512: 188ccb814e436937cbb91d29d73c316ce83f4b9c22f1cda56747f0949a093e10161ae724e87e4a2d85ac40f85f5f6b4e87e97d350a1ac44f80c57783f4423324
Being able to invoke Good() is important for address management (new vs tried
table, tried table eviction via test-before-evict). We mitigate potential
information leaks by not calling Connected() on these peer addresses.
If `-logips -debug=net` is specified then we print the contents of the
version message we send to the peer, including his address. Because the
addresses in the version message use pre-BIP155 encoding they cannot
represent a Tor v3 address and we would actually send 16 `0`s instead (a
dummy IPv6 address). However we would print the full address in the log
message. Before this fix:
```
2020-10-21T12:24:17Z send version message: version 70016, blocks=653500, us=[::]:0, them=xwjtp3mj427zdp4tljiiivg2l5ijfvmt5lcsfaygtpp6cw254kykvpyd.onion:8333, peer=0
```
This is confusing because we pretend to send one thing while we actually
send another. Adjust the printout to reflect what we are sending. After
this fix:
```
2020-10-21T12:26:54Z send version message: version 70016, blocks=653500, us=[::]:0, them=[::]:0, peer=0
```
da0988daf1 scripted-diff: rename vRecvGetData (Neha Narula)
ba951812ec Guard vRecvGetData (now in net processing) with its own mutex (Neha Narula)
2d9f2fca43 Move vRecvGetData to net processing (Neha Narula)
673247b58c Lock before checking if orphan_work_set is empty; indicate it is guarded (Neha Narula)
8803aee668 Move m_orphan_work_set to net_processing (Neha Narula)
9c47cb29f9 [Rename only] Rename orphan_work_set to m_orphan_work_set. (Neha Narula)
Pull request description:
Add annotations to guard `vRecvGetData` and `orphan_work_set` and fix up places where they were accessed without a lock. There is no current data race because they happen to be accessed by only one thread, but this might not always be the case.
Original discussion: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18861#discussion_r451778445
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK da0988daf1🐬
jnewbery:
Code review ACK da0988daf1
hebasto:
ACK da0988daf1, I have reviewed the code and it looks correct, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 31cadd319ddc9273a87e77afc4db7339fd636e816b5e742eba5cb32927ac5cc07a672b2268d2d38a75a0f1b17d93836adab9acf7e52f26ea9a43f54efa57257e
fa1f6f237d net: Send post-verack handshake messages at most once (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
There is no need to send `SENDHEADERS` and `SENDCMPCT` messages as a reply to each `VERACK` that is received. For alive checks, a `PING`/`PONG` can be used.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Concept ACK fa1f6f237d this is the only code section that sets `fCurrentlyConnected` and `fSuccessfullyConnected` to true. Could add a test. I did not verify if this code is actually being called repeatedly post initial verack; was it?
hebasto:
ACK fa1f6f237d, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
naumenkogs:
ACK fa1f6f237d
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa1f6f237d
Tree-SHA512: c841d5d3807254a49463bbcfac3b32881b34a9d3206899544c86322c20988e17ad2ae243cba227fd3825a914f0cb2584451edda2414aecee6d5e3f5a0636f08a
fd9a0060f0 Report and verify expirations (Pieter Wuille)
86f50ed10f Delete limitedmap as it is unused now (Pieter Wuille)
cc16fff3e4 Make txid delay penalty also apply to fetches of orphan's parents (Pieter Wuille)
173a1d2d3f Expedite removal of tx requests that are no longer needed (Pieter Wuille)
de11b0a4ef Reduce MAX_PEER_TX_ANNOUNCEMENTS for non-PF_RELAY peers (Pieter Wuille)
242d16477d Change transaction request logic to use txrequest (Pieter Wuille)
5b03121d60 Add txrequest fuzz tests (Pieter Wuille)
3c7fe0e5a0 Add txrequest unit tests (Pieter Wuille)
da3b8fde03 Add txrequest module (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This replaces the transaction request logic with an encapsulated class that maintains all the state surrounding it. By keeping it stand alone, it can be easily tested (using included unit tests and fuzz tests).
The major changes are:
* Announcements from outbound (and whitelisted) peers are now always preferred over those from inbound peers. This used to be the case for the first request (by delaying the first request from inbound peers), and a bias afters. The 2s delay for requests from inbound peers still exists, but after that, if viable outbound peers remain for any given transaction, they will always be tried first.
* No more hard cap of 100 in flight transactions per peer, as there is less need for it (memory usage is linear in the number of announcements, but independent from the number in flight, and CPU usage isn't affected by it). Furthermore, if only one peer announces a transaction, and it has over 100 in flight already, we still want to request it from them. The cap is replaced with a rule that announcements from such overloaded peers get an additional 2s delay (possibly combined with the existing 2s delays for inbound connections, and for txid peers when wtxid peers are available).
* The limit of 100000 tracked announcements is reduced to 5000; this was excessive. This can be bypassed using the PF_RELAY permission (to accommodate locally dumping a batch of many transactions).
This replaces #19184, rebased on #18044 and with many small changes.
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
Code Review ACK fd9a006. I've reviewed the new TxRequestTracker, its integration in net_processing, unit/functional/fuzzing test coverage. I looked more for soundness of new specification rather than functional consistency with old transaction request logic.
MarcoFalke:
Approach ACK fd9a0060f0🏹
naumenkogs:
Code Review ACK fd9a006. I've reviewed everything, mostly to see how this stuff works at the lower level (less documentation-wise, more implementation-wise), and to try breaking it with unexpected sequences of events.
jnewbery:
utACK fd9a0060f0
jonatack:
WIP light ACK fd9a0060f0 have read the code, verified that each commit is hygienic, e.g. debug build clean and tests green, and have been running a node on and off with this branch and grepping the net debug log. Am still unpacking the discussion hidden by GitHub by fetching it via the API and connecting the dots, storing notes and suggestions in a local branch; at this point none are blockers.
ryanofsky:
Light code review ACK fd9a0060f0, looking at txrequest implementation, unit test implementation, and net_processing integration, just trying to understand how it works and looking for anything potentially confusing in the implementation. Didn't look at functional tests or catch up on review discussion. Just a sanity check review focused on:
Tree-SHA512: ea7b52710371498b59d9c9cfb5230dd544fe9c6cb699e69178dea641646104f38a0b5ec7f5f0dbf1eb579b7ec25a31ea420593eff3b7556433daf92d4b0f0dd7
Whenever a transaction is added to the mempool or orphan pool, both
its txid and wtxid are considered AlreadyHave, and thus will eventually
be removed from m_txrequest.
The same is true for hashes added to the reject filter, but note that sometimes
only the wtxid is added (in which case only the wtxid can be removed from
m_txrequest).
Maintaining up to 100000 INVs per peer is excessive, as that is far more
than fits in a typical mempool.
Also disable the "overload" penalty for PF_RELAY peers.
This removes most transaction request logic from net_processing, and
replaces it with calls to a global TxRequestTracker object.
The major changes are:
* Announcements from outbound (and whitelisted) peers are now always
preferred over those from inbound peers. This used to be the case for the
first request (by delaying the first request from inbound peers), and
a bias afters. The 2s delay for requests from inbound peers still exists,
but after that, if viable outbound peers remain for any given transaction,
they will always be tried first.
* No more hard cap of 100 in flight transactions per peer, as there is less
need for it (memory usage is linear in the number of announcements, but
independent from the number in flight, and CPU usage isn't affected by it).
Furthermore, if only one peer announces a transaction, and it has over 100
in flight and requestable already, we still want to request it from them.
The cap is replaced with an additional 2s delay (possibly combined with the
existing 2s delays for inbound connections, and for txid peers when wtxid
peers are available).
Includes functional tests written by Marco Falke and Antoine Riard.
dcf0cb4776 tor: make a TORv3 hidden service instead of TORv2 (Vasil Dimov)
353a3fdaad net: advertise support for ADDRv2 via new message (Vasil Dimov)
201a4596d9 net: CAddress & CAddrMan: (un)serialize as ADDRv2 (Vasil Dimov)
1d3ec2a1fd Support bypassing range check in ReadCompactSize (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This PR contains the two remaining commits from #19031 to complete the [BIP155](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0155.mediawiki) implementation:
`net: CAddress & CAddrMan: (un)serialize as ADDRv2`
`net: advertise support for ADDRv2 via new message`
plus one more commit:
`tor: make a TORv3 hidden service instead of TORv2`
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK dcf0cb4776 per `git diff 9b56a68 dcf0cb4` only change since last review is an update to the release notes which partially picked up the suggested text. Running a node on this branch and addnode-ing to 6 other Tor v3 nodes, I see "addrv2" and "sendaddrv2" messages in getpeerinfo in both the "bytesrecv_per_msg" and "bytessent_per_msg" JSON objects.
sipa:
ACK dcf0cb4776
hebasto:
re-ACK dcf0cb4776, the node works flawlessly in all of the modes: Tor-only, clearnet-only, mixed.
laanwj:
Edit: I have to retract this ACK for now, I'm having some problems with this PR on a FreeBSD node. It drops all outgoing connections with this dcf0cb4776 merged on master (12a1c3ad1a).
ariard:
Code Review ACK dcf0cb4
Tree-SHA512: 28d4d0d817b8664d2f4b18c0e0f31579b2f0f2d23310ed213f1f436a4242afea14dfbf99e07e15889bc5c5c71ad50056797e9307ff8a90e96704f588a6171308
Introduce a new message `sendaddrv2` to signal support for ADDRv2.
Send the new message immediately after sending the `VERACK` message.
Add support for receiving and parsing ADDRv2 messages.
Send ADDRv2 messages (instead of ADDR) to a peer if he has
advertised support for it.
Co-authored-by: Carl Dong <contact@carldong.me>
b048b275d9 [validation] Remove absurdfee from accepttomempool (John Newbery)
932564b9cf scripted-diff: update max-fee-exceeded error message to include RPC (gzhao408)
8f1290c601 [rpc/node] check for high fee before ATMP in clients (gzhao408)
Pull request description:
Picked up from #15810. Add separate fee-checking logic for clients that need to enforce max fee rates, then remove the `absurdFee` logic from ATMP.
ATMP's `nAbsurdFee` argument is used to enforce user-specific behavior (it is not policy since it isn't applied consistently: it is only ever used in RPC and wallet, and set to 0 everywhere else internally). It should be removed from `AcceptToMemoryPool` because (1) validation results/mempool behavior should not be user-specific and (2) enforcing a max fee rate should be the responsibility of the client instead of the mempool.
Note: this PR does not intend to _remove_ protection from high fees, just re-delegate the responsibility to clients.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK b048b275d9
LarryRuane:
re-ACK b048b275d9
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK b048b275d9 , only change is squashing one commit 🏦
instagibbs:
utACK b048b275d9
Tree-SHA512: 57c17ba16d230a4cae2896dd6a64c924f307757824e35784bf96da7b10aff2d8ea910710edf35e981035623a155f8766209a92a0fdb856549fde78bc3eaae4d2
675e55e013 Ignore unknown messages before VERACK (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
This allows for feature negotiation to take place with messages between VERSION and VERACK in the future, without requiring additional software changes to specifically ignore messages for features that are unimplemented by our software.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 675e55e013
practicalswift:
ACK 675e55e013: patch looks correct
MarcoFalke:
ACK 675e55e013
hebasto:
ACK 675e55e013, the offender peer will be eventually disconnected due to the timeout.
Tree-SHA512: 8d2b1d8b9843f2ee26b2c30f7c5ff0bfcfbe3f46b32cd0369c48ece26624151091237e83ce3f18c6da004099026602cfab1642ac916db777f047d170b365c007
d76925478e [doc] Clarify semantic of peer's m_protect w.r.t to outbound eviction logics (Antoine Riard)
ac71fe936d [doc] Clarify scope of eviction protection of outbound block-relay peers (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
Block-relay-only peers were introduced by #15759. According to its
author, it was intented to make them only immune to outbound peer
rotation-based eviction and not from all eviction as modified comment
leans to think of.
Clearly indicate that outbound block-relay peers aren't protected
from eviction by the bad/lagging chain logic.
Fix#19863
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK d76925478e
jonatack:
ACK d76925478e
Tree-SHA512: 597fbd62838a6e39276024165b11514cad20a2e9d33cf9202d261cbadcb62b2df427c858e0cb57e585840d4c1d4600104aa53916bb868541f2580e4eed9b4b52
deb52711a1 Remove header checks out of net_processing (Troy Giorshev)
52d4ae46ab Give V1TransportDeserializer CChainParams& member (Troy Giorshev)
5bceef6b12 Change CMessageHeader Constructor (Troy Giorshev)
1ca20c1af8 Add doxygen comment for ReceiveMsgBytes (Troy Giorshev)
890b1d7c2b Move checksum check from net_processing to net (Troy Giorshev)
2716647ebf Give V1TransportDeserializer an m_node_id member (Troy Giorshev)
Pull request description:
Inspired by #15206 and #15197, this PR moves all message header verification from the message processing layer and into the network/transport layer.
In the previous PRs there is a change in behavior, where we would disconnect from peers upon a single failed checksum check. In various discussions there was concern over whether this was the right choice, and some expressed a desire to see how this would look if it was made to be a pure refactor.
For more context, see https://bitcoincore.reviews/15206.html#l-81.
This PR improves the separation between the p2p layers, helping improvements like [BIP324](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18242) and #18989.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK deb52711a1 just rebase due to conflict on adjacent line
jnewbery:
Code review ACK deb52711a1.
Tree-SHA512: 1a3b7ae883b020cfee1bef968813e04df651ffdad9dd961a826bd80654f2c98676ce7f4721038a1b78d8790e4cebe8060419e3d8affc97ce2b9b4e4b72e6fa9f
a512925e19 [doc] Release notes (Amiti Uttarwar)
50f94b34a3 [rpc] Deprecate getpeerinfo addnode field (Amiti Uttarwar)
df091b9b50 [refactor] Rename test file to allow any getpeerinfo deprecations. (Amiti Uttarwar)
395acfa83a [rpc] Add connection type to getpeerinfo RPC, update tests (Amiti Uttarwar)
49c10a9ca4 [log] Add connection type to log statement (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
After #19316, we can more directly expose information about the connection type on the `getpeerinfo` RPC. Doing so also makes the existing addnode field redundant, so this PR begins the process of deprecating this field.
This PR also includes one commit that improves a log message, as both use a shared function to return the connection type as a string.
Suggested by sdaftuar- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19316#discussion_r468001604 & https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19316#discussion_r468018093
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK a512925e19.
sipa:
utACK a512925e19
guggero:
Tested and code review ACK a512925e.
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK a512925e19🌇
promag:
Code review ACK a512925e19.
Tree-SHA512: 601a7a38aee235ee59aca690784f886dc2ae4e418b2e6422c4b58cd597376c00f74910f66920b08a08a0bec28bf8022e71a1435785ff6ba8a188954261aba78e
0bd1184adf Remove unused LockAssertion struct (Hennadii Stepanov)
ab2a44297f Replace LockAssertion with a proper thread safety annotations (Hennadii Stepanov)
73f71e1996 refactor: Use explicit function type instead of template (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR replaces `LockAssertion` with `AssertLockHeld`, and removes `LockAssertion`.
This PR is compared with alternatives in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/AssertLockHeld-PRs
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 0bd1184adf
ajtowns:
ACK 0bd1184adf
vasild:
ACK 0bd1184ad
Tree-SHA512: ef7780dd689faf0bb479fdb97c49bc652e2dd10c148234bb95502dfbb676442d8565ee37864d923ca21a25f9dc2a335bf46ee82c095e387b59a664ab05c0ae41
This moves header size and netmagic checking out of net_processing and
into net. This check now runs in ReadHeader, so that net can exit early
out of receiving bytes from the peer. IsValid is now slimmed down, so
it no longer needs a MessageStartChars& parameter.
Additionally this removes the rest of the m_valid_* members from
CNetMessage.
This removes the m_valid_checksum member from CNetMessage. Instead,
GetMessage() returns an Optional.
Additionally, GetMessage() has been given an out parameter to be used to
hold error information. For now it is specifically a uint32_t used to
hold the raw size of the corrupt message.
The checksum check is now done in GetMessage.
In addition to adding more specificity to the log statement about the type of
connection, this change also consolidates two statements into one. Previously,
the second one should have never been hit, since block-relay connections would
match the "!IsInboundConn()" condition and return early.
ddefb5c0b7 p2p: Use the greatest common version in peer logic (Hennadii Stepanov)
e084d45562 p2p: Remove SetCommonVersion() from VERACK handler (Hennadii Stepanov)
8d2026796a refactor: Rename local variable nSendVersion (Hennadii Stepanov)
e9a6d8b13b p2p: Unify Send and Receive protocol versions (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On master (6fef85bfa3) `CNode` has two members to keep protocol version:
- `nRecvVersion` for received messages
- `nSendVersion` for messages to send
After exchanging with `VERSION` and `VERACK` messages via protocol version `INIT_PROTO_VERSION`, both nodes set `nRecvVersion` _and_ `nSendVersion` to _the same_ value which is the greatest common protocol version.
This PR:
- replaces two `CNode` members, `nRecvVersion` `nSendVersion`, with `m_greatest_common_version`
- removes duplicated getter and setter
There is no change in behavior on the P2P network.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK ddefb5c0b7
naumenkogs:
ACK ddefb5c0b7
fjahr:
Code review ACK ddefb5c0b7
amitiuttarwar:
code review but untested ACK ddefb5c0b7
benthecarman:
utACK `ddefb5c`
Tree-SHA512: 5305538dbaa5426b923b0afd20bdef4f248d310855d1d78427210c00716c67b7cb691515c421716b6157913e453076e293b10ff5fd2cd26a8e5375d42da7809d
0d04784af1 Refactor the functional test (Gleb Naumenko)
83ad65f31b Address nits in ADDR caching (Gleb Naumenko)
81b00f8780 Add indexing ADDR cache by local socket addr (Gleb Naumenko)
42ec558542 Justify the choice of ADDR cache lifetime (Gleb Naumenko)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up on #18991 which does 3 things:
- improves privacy of a node listening to multiple addresses via adding cache index by local socket addr (suggested [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18991#issuecomment-668219345))
- documents on the choice of 24h cache lifetime
- addresses nits from #18991
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 0d04784af1
vasild:
ACK 0d04784
jonatack:
Code review ACK 0d04784
Tree-SHA512: bb65a34dd1ce2811186d3e4469bc33e8399cebaaa494ce13041c7cff23275870e4176a719f7a72f8d779c49f8b2344bf4fa1aeb3ea4e2626d5ae76514f00a750
a8a64acaf3 [BroadcastTransaction] Remove unsafe move operator (Amiti Uttarwar)
125c038126 [p2p] Remove dead code (Amiti Uttarwar)
fc66d0a65c [p2p] Check for nullptr before dereferencing pointer (Adam Jonas)
cb79b9dbf4 [mempool] Revert unbroadcast set to tracking just txid (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
Addresses some outstanding review comments from #18044
- reverts unbroadcast txids to a set instead of a map (simpler, communicates intent better, takes less space, no efficiency advantages of map)
- adds safety around two touchpoints (check for nullptr before dereferencing pointer, remove an inaccurate std::move operator)
- removes some dead code
Links to comments on wtxid PR: [1](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18044#discussion_r460495254) [2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18044#discussion_r460496023) [3](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18044#discussion_r463532611)
thanks to jnewbery & adamjonas for flagging these ! !
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
utACK a8a64acaf3
naumenkogs:
utACK a8a64acaf3
jnewbery:
utACK a8a64acaf3
Tree-SHA512: 7be669cb30cc17fb9e06b50e636ef7887c6a27354697987e4e4d38dba4b8f50e175647587430cd9bc3295bec01ce8b1e6639a50a4249d8fff9b1ca1b9ead3277
The field m_protect is used to protect from eviction both by bad/lagging
chain and extra outbound peers logics. Outbound block-relay peers are
always excluded from this protection.
There is a keyword that allows us to break out of loops. Use it.
There's a small change in behaviour here: if we process multiple orphans
that are still orphans, then we'll only call mempool.check() once at the
end, instead of after processing each tx.
bb6a32ce99 [net processing] Move Misbehaving() to PeerManager (John Newbery)
aa114b1c9b [net_processing] Move SendBlockTransactions into PeerManager (John Newbery)
3115e00f75 [net processing] Move MaybePunishPeerForTx to PeerManager (John Newbery)
e662e2d42a [net processing] Move ProcessOrphanTx to PeerManager (John Newbery)
b70cd890e3 [net processing] Move MaybePunishNodeForBlock into PeerManager (John Newbery)
d7778351bf [net processing] Move ProcessHeadersMessage to PeerManager (John Newbery)
64f6162651 [whitespace] tidy up indentation after scripted diff (John Newbery)
58bd369b0d scripted-diff: [net processing] Rename PeerLogicValidation to PeerManager (John Newbery)
2297b26b3c [net_processing] Pass chainparams to PeerLogicValidation constructor (John Newbery)
824bbd1ffb [move only] Collect all private members of PeerLogicValidation together (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Continues the work of moving net_processing logic into PeerLogicValidation. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19704 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19607#discussion_r462032894 for motivation.
This PR also renames `PeerLogicValidation` to `PeerManager` as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10756#pullrequestreview-53892618.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK bb6a32ce99 only change is rebase due to conflict in struct NodeContext and variable rename 🤸
hebasto:
re-ACK bb6a32ce99, only rebased, and added renaming `s/peer_logic/peerman/` into scripted-diff since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19791#pullrequestreview-483118079) review (verified with `git range-diff`).
Tree-SHA512: a2de4a521688fd25125b401e5575402c52b328a0fa27b3010567008d4f596b960aabbd02b2d81f42658f88f4365443fadb1008150a62fbcea123fb42d85a2c21
