308dd2e93e Sanity assert GetAncestor() != nullptr where appropriate (Adam Jonas)
Pull request description:
Re-opening #17232. I have rebased the PR and addressed jonatack's nit suggestions.
Add sanity asserts for return value of `CBlockIndex::GetAncestor()` where appropriate.
In validation.cpp `CheckSequenceLocks`, check the return value of `tip->GetAncestor(maxInputHeight)` stored into `lp->maxInputBlock`. If it ever returns `nullptr` because the ancestor isn't found, it's going to be a bad bug to keep going, since a `LockPoints` object with the `maxInputBlock` member set to `nullptr` signifies no relative lock time.
In the other places, the added asserts would prevent accidental dereferencing of a null pointer which is undefined behavior.
Co-Authored-By: Adam Jonas <jonas@chaincode.com>
Co-Authored-By: danra <danra@users.noreply.github.com>
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 308dd2e93e
Tree-SHA512: 5bfdaab1499607ae2c3cd3e2e9e8c37850bfd0e327e680f4e36c81f9c6d98a543af78ecfac1ab0e06325d264412615a04d52005875780c7db2a4d81bd2d2259a
Add sanity asserts for return value of `CBlockIndex::GetAncestor()` where appropriate.
In validation.cpp `CheckSequenceLocks`, check the return value of `tip->GetAncestor(maxInputHeight)` stored into `lp->maxInputBlock`. If it ever returns `nullptr` because the ancestor isn't found, it's going to be a bad bug to keep going, since a `LockPoints` object with the `maxInputBlock` member set to `nullptr` signifies no relative lock time.
In the other places, the added asserts would prevent accidental dereferencing of a null pointer which is undefined behavior.
Co-Authored-By: Aurèle Oulès <aurele@oules.com>
Co-Authored-By: danra <danra@users.noreply.github.com>
f64aa9c411 Disallow more unsafe string->path conversions allowed by path append operators (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Add more `fs::path` `operator/` and `operator+` overloads to prevent unsafe string->path conversions on Windows that would cause strings to be decoded according to the current Windows locale & code page instead of the correct string encoding.
Update application code to deal with loss of implicit string->path conversions by calling `fs::u8path` or `fs::PathFromString` explicitly, or by just changing variable types from `std::string` to `fs::path` to avoid conversions altogether, or make them happen earlier.
In all cases, there's no change in behavior either (1) because strings only contained ASCII characters and would be decoded the same regardless of what encoding was used, or (2) because of the 1:1 mapping between paths and strings using the `PathToString` and `PathFromString` functions.
Motivation for this PR was just that I was experimenting with #24469 and noticed that operations like `fs::path / std::string` were allowed, and I thought it would be better not to allow them.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK f64aa9c411
Tree-SHA512: 944cce49ed51537ee7a35ea4ea7f5feaf0c8fff2fa67ee81ec5adebfd3dcbaf41b73eb35e49973d5f852620367f13506fd12a7a9b5ae3a7a0007414d5c9df50f
fa10c9f5a1 Crash debug builds on PCKG_MEMPOOL_ERROR (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Would be nice to allow fuzz targets to meaningfully cover this code
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
utACK fa10c9f5a1
vincenzopalazzo:
ACK fa10c9f5a1
Tree-SHA512: 68efacedbf72f67cf3dc0bb9927a698492cdc1b08df91ef6af863ad8828b78058a64e52d64d244a5b2966cb9e63797b2647d1bb222677bf83b26fca6e4b1dbf0
In previous commits in this patchset, we've made sure that every
Unload/UnloadBlockIndex member function resets its own members, and does
not reach out to globals.
This means that their corresponding classes' default destructors can now
replace them, and do an even more thorough job without the need to be
updated for every new member variable.
Therefore, we can remove them, and also remove UnloadBlockIndex since
that's not used anymore.
Unfortunately, chainstatemanager_loadblockindex relies on
CChainState::UnloadBlockIndex, so that needs to stay for now.
This change also introduces an aditional buffer of 10 blocks (PRUNE_LOCK_BUFFER) that will not be pruned before the best block.
Co-authored-by: Luke Dashjr <luke-jr+git@utopios.org>
Add more fs::path operator/ and operator+ overloads to prevent unsafe
string->path conversions on Windows that would cause strings to be
decoded according to the current Windows locale & code page instead of
the correct string encoding.
Update application code to deal with loss of implicit string->path
conversions by calling fs::u8path or fs::PathFromString explicitly, or
by just changing variable types from std::string to fs::path to avoid
conversions altoghther, or make them happen earlier.
In all cases, there's no change in behavior either (1) because strings
only contained ASCII characters and would be decoded the same regardless
of what encoding was used, or (2) because of the 1:1 mapping between
paths and strings using the PathToString and PathFromString functions.
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
-----
Code Reviewer Notes
Call graph of relevant functions:
UnloadBlockIndex() <-- Moved from
calls ChainstateManager::Unload()
which calls BlockManager::Unload() <-- Moved to
So calling UnloadBlockIndex() would still run this moved code. The code
will also now run when ~BlockManager gets called, which makes sense.
-----
Code Reviewer Notes
Call graph of relevant functions:
UnloadBlockIndex() <-- Moved from
calls ChainstateManager::Unload() <-- Moved to
Safe because ChainstateManager::Unload() is called only by
UnloadBlockIndex() and no other callers.
Now BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex() will ACTUALLY only load BlockMan
members.
[META] In a later commit, pindexBestHeader will be moved to ChainMan as
a member
-----
Code Reviewer Notes
Call graph of relevant functions:
ChainstateManager::LoadBlockIndex() <-- Moved to
calls BlockManager::LoadBlockIndexDB()
which calls BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex() <-- Moved from
There is only one call to each of inner functions, meaning that no
behavior is changing.
Package validation policy only differs from individual policy in its
evaluation of feerate. Minimize DoS surface; don't validate all over
again if we know the result will be the same.
This avoids "parents pay for children" and "siblings pay for siblings"
behavior, since package feerate is calculated with totals and is
topology-unaware.
It also ensures that package validation never causes us to reject a
transaction that we would have otherwise accepted in single-tx
validation.
cccc1e70b8 Enforce Taproot script flags whenever WITNESS is set (MarcoFalke)
fa42299411 Remove nullptr check in GetBlockScriptFlags (MarcoFalke)
faadc606c7 refactor: Pass const reference instead of pointer to GetBlockScriptFlags (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Now that Taproot is active, it makes sense to enforce its rules on all blocks, even historic ones, regardless of the deployment status.
### Benefits:
(With "script flags" I mean "taproot script verification flags".)
* Script flags are known ahead for all blocks (even blocks not yet created) and do not change. This may benefit static analysis, code review, and development of new script features that build on Taproot.
* Any future bugs introduced in the deployment code won't have any effect on the script flags, as they are independent of deployment.
* Enforcing the taproot rules regardless of the deployment status makes testing easier because invalid blocks after activation are also invalid before activation. So there is no need to differentiate the two cases.
* It gives belt-and-suspenders protection against a practically expensive and theoretically impossible IBD reorg attack where the node is eclipsed. While `nMinimumChainWork` already protects against this, the cost for a few months worth of POW might be lowered until a major version release of Bitcoin Core reaches EOL. The needed work for the attack is the difference between `nMinimumChainWork` and the work at block 709632.
For reference, previously the same was done for P2SH and WITNESS in commit 0a8b7b4b33.
### Implementation:
I found one block which fails verification with the flags applied, so I added a `TaprootException`, similar to the `BIP16Exception`.
For reference, the debug log:
```
ERROR: ConnectBlock(): CheckInputScripts on b10c007c60e14f9d087e0291d4d0c7869697c6681d979c6639dbd960792b4d41 failed with non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Witness program was passed an empty witness)
BlockChecked: block hash=0000000000000000000f14c35b2d841e986ab5441de8c585d5ffe55ea1e395ad state=non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Witness program was passed an empty witness)
InvalidChainFound: invalid block=0000000000000000000f14c35b2d841e986ab5441de8c585d5ffe55ea1e395ad height=692261 log2_work=92.988459 date=2021-07-23T08:24:20Z
InvalidChainFound: current best=0000000000000000000067b17a4c0ffd77c29941b15ad356ca8f980af137a25d height=692260 log2_work=92.988450 date=2021-07-23T07:47:31Z
ERROR: ConnectTip: ConnectBlock 0000000000000000000f14c35b2d841e986ab5441de8c585d5ffe55ea1e395ad failed, non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Witness program was passed an empty witness)
```
Hint for testing, make sure to set `-noassumevalid`.
### Considerations
Obviously this change can lead to consensus splits on the network in light of massive reorgs. Currently the last block before Taproot activation, that is the last block without the Taproot script flags set, is only buried by a few days of POW. However, when and if this patch is included in the next major release, it will be buried by a few months of POW. BIP90 considerations apply when looking at reorgs this large.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK cccc1e70b8
achow101:
ACK cccc1e70b8
laanwj:
Code review ACK cccc1e70b8
ajtowns:
ACK cccc1e70b8 ; code review; wrote a "getblockscriptflags" rpc to quickly check that blocks just had bit 17 (taproot) added; review of earlier revisions had established non-exception blocks do validate with taproot rules enabled.
jamesob:
ACK cccc1e70b8 ([`jamesob/ackr/23536.1.MarcoFalke.enforce_taproot_script_f`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/23536.1.MarcoFalke.enforce_taproot_script_f))
Tree-SHA512: 00044de68939caef6420ffd588c1291c041a8b397c80a3df1e3e3487fbeae1821d23975c51c95e44e774558db76f943b00b4e27cbd0213f64a9253116dc6edde
f865cf8ded Add and use BlockManager::GetAllBlockIndices (Carl Dong)
28ba0313ea Add and use CBlockIndexHeightOnlyComparator (Carl Dong)
12eb05df63 move-only: Move CBlockIndexWorkComparator to blockstorage (Carl Dong)
c600ee3816 Only load BlockMan in BlockMan member functions (Carl Dong)
42e56d9b18 style-only: No need for std::pair for vSortedByHeight (Carl Dong)
3bbb6fea05 style-only: Various blockstorage.cpp cleanups (Carl Dong)
5be9ee3c54 refactor: more const annotations for uses of CBlockIndex* (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
The only important commit is "Only load BlockMan in BlockMan member functions", everything else is all just small style changes.
Here's the commit message, reproduced:
```
This commit effectively splits the "load block index itself" logic from
"derive Chainstate variables from loaded block index" logic.
This means that BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex{,DB} will only load what's
relevant to the BlockManager.
```
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK f865cf8ded ; code review only
MarcoFalke:
review ACK f865cf8ded 🗂
Tree-SHA512: 7b204d782834e06fd7329d022e2ae860181b4e8105c33bfb928539a4ec24161dc7438a9c4d4ee279dcad77de310c160b997bb8aa18923243d0fd55ccf4ad7c3a
This commit effectively splits the "load block index itself" logic from
"derive Chainstate variables from loaded block index" logic.
This means that BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex{,DB} will only load what's
relevant to the BlockManager.
I strongly recommend reviewing with the following git-diff flags:
--color-moved=dimmed_zebra --color-moved-ws=allow-indentation-change
fa8d4d9128 scripted-diff: Clarify CheckFinalTxAtTip name (MarcoFalke)
fa4e30b0f3 policy: Remove unused locktime flags (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The locktime flags have many issues:
* They are passed in by a default argument, which is fragile. It has already lead to bugs like the one fixed in commit e30b6ea194.
* They are negative (signed), which doesn't make sense for flags (unsigned in general). According to the review comments when the code was added: "The max on the flags is a fairly weird operation." (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6566#issuecomment-150310861)
* No call site relies on the default argument and they all pass in a single compile-time constant, rendering most of the code dead and untested.
* The dead code calls `GetAdjustedTime` (network adjusted time), which has its own issues. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/4521
Fix all issues by removing them
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK fa8d4d9128
theStack:
Code-review ACK fa8d4d9128
glozow:
ACK fa8d4d9128, agree the default arg `flags` is a massive footgun and just setting max flags is weird. Adding `AtTip` to the names makes sense to me, since they're both testing for *next* block and only ever used for {,re}addition to mempool.
Tree-SHA512: 79f4a52f34909eb598d88bbae7afe8abe5f85f45c128483d16aa83dacd0e5579e561b725d01b1e9a931d1821012a51ad2bc6fb2867f8d09ee541f9d234d696f8
faa1aec26b Remove confusing P1008R1 violation in ATMPArgs (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `= delete` doesn't achieve the stated goal and it is also redundant, since it is not possible to default construct the `ATMPArgs` type.
This can be tested with:
```diff
diff --git a/src/validation.cpp b/src/validation.cpp
index 2813b62462..1c939c0b8a 100644
--- a/src/validation.cpp
+++ b/src/validation.cpp
@@ -519,6 +519,7 @@ public:
/** Parameters for child-with-unconfirmed-parents package validation. */
static ATMPArgs PackageChildWithParents(const CChainParams& chainparams, int64_t accept_time,
std::vector<COutPoint>& coins_to_uncache) {
+ ATMPArgs{};
return ATMPArgs{/* m_chainparams */ chainparams,
/* m_accept_time */ accept_time,
/* m_bypass_limits */ false,
```
Which fails on current master *and* this pull with the following error:
```
validation.cpp:525:22: error: reference member of type 'const CChainParams &' uninitialized
ATMPArgs{};
~^
validation.cpp:470:29: note: uninitialized reference member is here
const CChainParams& m_chainparams;
^
1 error generated.
```
Further reading (optional):
* http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2018/p1008r1.pdf
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK faa1aec26b
glozow:
code review ACK faa1aec26b
Tree-SHA512: 16db2c9959a1996eafbfa533dc4d1483761b9d28295aed5a82b86abd7268da37c51c59ddc67c205165ecb415dbe637b12a0e1b3234d50ab0b3b79de66d7bd73e
6c23c41561 refactor: Rewrite AddToBlockIndex with try_emplace (Carl Dong)
c05cf7aa1e style: Modernize range-based loops over m_block_index (Carl Dong)
c2a1655799 style-only: Use using instead of typedef for BlockMap (Carl Dong)
dd79dad175 refactor: Rewrite InsertBlockIndex with try_emplace (Carl Dong)
531dce0347 tests: Remove now-unnecessary manual Unload's (Carl Dong)
bec86ae326 blockstorage: Make m_block_index own CBlockIndex's (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Part of: #24303
Split off from: #22564
```
Instead of having CBlockIndex's live on the heap, which requires manual
memory management, have them be owned by m_block_index. This means that
they will live and die with BlockManager.
```
The second commit demonstrates how this makes calls to `Unload()` to satisfy the address sanitizer unnecessary.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 6c23c41561
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 6c23c41561🎨
Tree-SHA512: 81b2b5119be27cc0f8a9457b11da60cc60930315d2a5be36be89fe253d32073ffe622348ff153114b9b3212197bddbc791810913a43811b33cc58e7162bd105b
ae9ceed3e2 validation, refactoring: remove ChainstateManager::Reset() (Jon Atack)
daad0093e3 validation: replace lock with annotation in UnloadBlockIndex() (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Thread safety refactoring seen in #24177:
- replace re-acquiring lock cs_main with a thread safety annotation in UnloadBlockIndex()
- remove ChainstateManager::Reset(), as it is currently unused (can be reintroduced in the test utilities if needed for unit testing)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK ae9ceed3e2
vasild:
ACK ae9ceed3e2
klementtan:
crACK ae9ceed3e2
Tree-SHA512: cebb782572997cc2dda01590d6bb6c5e479e8202324d8b6ff459b814ce09e818b996c881736bfebd1b8bf4b6d7a0f79faf3ffea176a4699dd7d7429de2db2d13
fa7991601c Fixup style of VerifyDB (MarcoFalke)
fa462ea787 Avoid implicit-integer-sign-change in VerifyLoadedChainstate (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This happens when checking all blocks (`-1`).
To test:
```
./configure CC=clang CXX=clang++ --with-sanitizers=undefined,integer
make
UBSAN_OPTIONS="suppressions=$(pwd)/test/sanitizer_suppressions/ubsan:print_stacktrace=1:halt_on_error=1:report_error_type=1" ./test/functional/rpc_blockchain.py
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code-review ACK fa7991601c
brunoerg:
crACK fa7991601c
Tree-SHA512: bcbe6becf2fbedd21bbde83a544122e79465937346802039532143b2e4165784905a8852c0ccb088b964874df5e5550931fdde3629cbcee3ae237f2f63c43a8e
Instead of having CBlockIndex's live on the heap, which requires manual
memory management, have them be owned by m_block_index. This means that
they will live and die with BlockManager.
A change to BlockManager::LookupBlockIndex:
- Previously, it was a const member function returning a non-const CBlockIndex*
- Now, there's are const and non-const versions of
BlockManager::LookupBlockIndex returning a CBlockIndex with the same
const-ness as the member function:
(e.g. const CBlockIndex* LookupBlockIndex(...) const)
See next commit for some weirdness that this eliminates.
The range based for-loops are modernize (using auto + destructuring) in
a future commit.
48742693ac Replace "can not" with "cannot" in docs, user messages, and tests (Jon Atack)
e670edd434 User-facing content fixups from transifex translator feedback (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Closes#24366.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review re-ACK 48742693ac
hebasto:
re-ACK 48742693ac, only suggested change since my previous [review](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24367#pullrequestreview-885938219).
Tree-SHA512: 4dcdcb417251a413e65fab6070515e13a1267c8e0dbcf521386b842511391f24c84a0c2168fe13458c977682034466509bf2a3453719d4d94d3c568fd9f4adb4
799968e8b3 tracing: misc follow-ups to 22902 (0xb10c)
36a6584703 tracing: correctly scope utxocache:flush tracepoint (Arnab Sen)
Pull request description:
This PR is a follow-up to the [#22902](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22902).
Previously, the tracepoint `utxocache:flush` was called, even when it was not flushing. So, the tracepoint is now scoped to write only when coins cache to disk.
ACKs for top commit:
0xB10C:
ACK 799968e8b3
Tree-SHA512: ebb096cbf991c551c81e4339821f10d9768c14cf3d8cb14d0ad851acff5980962228a1c746914c6aba3bdb27e8be53b33349c41efe8bab5542f639916e437b5f
eb8b22d517 block_connected: re-use previous GetTimeMicros (William Casarin)
80e1c55687 block_connected: don't serialize block hash twice (William Casarin)
Pull request description:
In the validation:block_connected tracepoint, we call block->GetHash(), which
ends up calling CBlockHeader::GetHash(), executing around 8000 serialization
instructions. We don't need to do this extra work, because block->GetHash() is
already called further up in the function. Let's save that value as a local
variable and re-use it in our tracepoint so there is no unnecessary tracepoint
overhead.
Shave off an extra 100 or so instructions from the validation:block_connected
tracepoint by reusing a nearby GetTimeMicros(). This brings the tracepoint down
to 54 instructions. Still high, but much better than the previous ~154 and
8000 instructions which it was originally.
Signed-off-by: William Casarin <jb55@jb55.com>
ACKs for top commit:
0xB10C:
ACK eb8b22d517
laanwj:
Code review ACK eb8b22d517
theStack:
re-ACK eb8b22d517
Tree-SHA512: 92ae585e487554e0f73042a8abaa239f630502c1d198e010bd7c1de252d882bccb627bbf0e4faec09c1253e782b145bcf153f9fee78cdb8456188044a96f8267
