850670e3d6 test: don't run old binaries under valgrind (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Some, but not all, backward compatibility tests fail for me and it seems useless to run old release binaries under valgrind anyway.
Can be tested by running `test/functional/feature_txindex_compatibility.py --valgrind --timeout-factor=10` with and without this PR.
—
The previous version of this PR disabled these test entirely under valgrind. The current version does run the test, but starts the old binaries without valgrind.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 850670e3d6
Tree-SHA512: ebdf461083f1292528e6619963b910f486b60b4f6b183f0aea2c8bfcafa98caeb204d138700cd288450643bcec5e49e12b89f2f7537fccdf495a2a33acd9cea0
3bb51c29df test: BIP324: add check for missing garbage terminator detection (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the "missing garbage terminator" detection on incoming v2 transport (BIP324) connections:
04265ba937/src/net.cpp (L1205-L1209)
Note that this always happens at the same exact amount of bytes sent in (after 64 + 4095 + 16 = 4175 bytes), if at no point, the last 16 bytes of potential authentication data match the garbage, i.e. all the previous bytes after the ellswift pubkey. To keep it simple, we just send in zero-value bytes here and verify that the detection hits exactly after the last bytes is sent.
AFAICT, with this PR all the v2 transport errors that can be triggered in this simple way of "just open a socket and send in a fixed byte-string" are covered. For more advanced test, we need BIP324 cryptography in the test framework in order to perform a v2 handshake etc. (PRs #28374, #24748).
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 3bb51c29df
laanwj:
ACK 3bb51c29df
Tree-SHA512: f88275061c7c377a3d9f2608452671afc26deb6d5bd5be596de987c7e5042555153ffe681760c33bce2b921ae04e50f349ea0128a677e6443a95a079e52cdc5f
This is unnecessary and caused test failures. The backward
compatibility tests are meant to find regressions in the
current codebase, not to detect bugs in older releases.
2e31250027 test: check that loading snapshot not matching AssumeUTXO parameters fails (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the failed loading of an AssumeUTXO snapshot in case the referenced block hash doesn't match the parameters in the chainparams. Right now, I expect this would be the most common error-case for `loadtxoutset` out in the wild, as for mainnet the `m_assumeutxo_data` map is empty and this error condition would obviously always be triggered for any (otherwise valid, correctly encoded) snapshot. Note that this test-case is the simplest scenario and doesn't cover any of the TODO ideas mentioned at the top of the functional test yet.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK 2e31250027
Sjors:
utACK 2e31250027
achow101:
ACK 2e31250027
Tree-SHA512: 8bcb2d525c95fbc95f87d3e978ad717d95bddb1ff67cbe7d3b06e4783f0f1ffba32b17ef451468c39c23bc1b3ef1150baa71148c145275c386f2d4822d790d39
bfa0bd632a test: Use pathlib over os.path #28362 (ns-xvrn)
Pull request description:
In reference to issue #28362 refactoring of functional tests to use pathlib over os.path to reduce verbosity and increase the intuitiveness of managing file access.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
re-ACK bfa0bd632a🐨
willcl-ark:
ACK bfa0bd632a
Tree-SHA512: fb0833c4039d09758796514e47567a93ac831cb0776ff1a7ed8299792ad132e83282ef80bea098a88ae1551d906f2a56093d3e8de240412f9080735d00d496d9
74c77825e5 test: Unit test for inferring scripts with hybrid and uncompressed keys (Andrew Chow)
f895f97014 test: Scripts with hybrid pubkeys are migrated to watchonly (Andrew Chow)
37b9b73477 descriptors: Move InferScript's pubkey validity checks to InferPubkey (Andrew Chow)
b7485f11ab descriptors: Check result of InferPubkey (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`InferDescriptor` was not always checking that the pubkey it was placing into the descriptor was an allowed pubkey. For example, given a P2WPKH script that uses an uncompressed pubkey, it would produce a `wpkh()` with the uncompressed key. Additionally, the hybrid key check was only being done for `pk()` scripts, where it should've been done for all scripts.
This PR moves the key checking into `InferPubkey`. If the key is not valid for the context, then `nullptr` is returned and the inferring will fall through to the defaults of either `raw()` or `addr()`.
This also resolves an issue with migrating legacy wallets that contain hybrid pubkeys as such watchonly scripts will become `raw()` or `addr()` and go to the watchonly wallet. Note that a legacy wallet cannot sign for hybrid pubkeys. A test has been added for the migration case.
Also added unit tests for `InferDescriptor` itself as the edge cases with that function are not covered by the descriptor roundtrip test.
ACKs for top commit:
furszy:
ACK 74c77825
Sjors:
utACK 74c77825e5
Tree-SHA512: ed5f63e42a2e46120245a6b0288b90d2a6912860814c6c08fe393332add1cb364dc5eca72f16980352143570aef0c07bf1a91acd294099463bd028b6ce2fe40c
Bitcoind nodes send getaddr msgs only to outbound nodes (and ignore those
received by outgoing connections). The python p2p node should mirror
this behavior by not sending a getaddr message when it is not the
initiator of the connection.
Recently usage of undeclared functions became an error rather than a
warning, in C2x. https://reviews.llvm.org/D122983?id=420290
This change has migrated into the build tools of Ubuntu 23.10 which now
causes the USDT tests to fail to compile, see
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28600
Fix this by setting `-Wno-error=implicit-function-declaration` for the
tracing programs.
05af4dfa50 test: Use feerate higher than minrelay fee in wallet_fundraw (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The external input weight test in wallet_fundrawtransaction.py made transactions at the minimum relay fee. However due to ECDSA sometimes making a shorter signature than expected, the size estimate (and therefore the funded fee) ends up being a little bit too low, which results in the final transaction being under the min relay fee. We can compensate for this by just using a feerate higher than the minrelayfee as the actual feerate itself does not matter in this test.
Fixes#28437
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
utACK 05af4dfa50, seems right to me
Tree-SHA512: 3e08f052db32d891515d32b27b2d7c5bcbfc77d5ea457eefc75e8aa6d40960278e537c1e8bffe7ddc211949c78e14145a671a8d34e7e1bb15438773cb0d9e89d
This makes it more generalistic than just having the miniscripts since
we are going to have Taproot descriptors with (multiple) miniscripts in
them too.
- Remove usage of the internal wait_until_helper function
- Use framework self.no_op instead of new no_sync function
co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <github@achow101.com>
0f83ab407e test: display abrupt shutdown errors in console output (furszy)
Pull request description:
Making it easier to debug errors in the CI environment,
particularly in scenarios where it's not immediately clear
what happened nor which node crashed (or shutdown abruptly).
A bit of context:
Currently, the test framework redirects each node's stderr output
stream to a different temporary file inside each node's data directory.
While this is sufficient for storing the error, it isn't very helpful for
understanding what happened just by reading the CI console output.
Most of the time, reading the stderr file in the CI environment is not
possible, because people don't have access to it.
Testing Note:
The displayed error difference can be observed by cherry-picking this
commit 9cc5393c0f on top of this branch and running any
functional test.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 0f83ab407e
theStack:
ACK 0f83ab407e
Tree-SHA512: 83ce4d21d5316e8cb16a17d3fbe77b8649fced9e09410861d9674c233f6e9c34bcf573504e387e4f439c2841b2ee9855d0d35607fa13aa89eafe0080c45ee82d
The external input weight test in wallet_fundrawtransaction.py made
transactions at the minimum relay fee. However due to ECDSA sometimes
making a shorter signature than expected, the size estimate (and
therefore the funded fee) ends up being a little bit too low, which
results in the final transaction being under the min relay fee. We can
compensate for this by just using a feerate higher than the minrelayfee
as the actual feerate itself does not matter in this test.
5b878be742 [doc] add release note for submitpackage (glozow)
7a9bb2a2a5 [rpc] allow submitpackage to be called outside of regtest (glozow)
5b9087a9a7 [rpc] require package to be a tree in submitpackage (glozow)
e32ba1599c [txpackages] IsChildWithParentsTree() (glozow)
b4f28cc345 [doc] parent pay for child in aggregate CheckFeeRate (glozow)
Pull request description:
Permit (restricted topology) submitpackage RPC outside of regtest. Suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26933#issuecomment-1510851570
This RPC should be safe but still experimental - interface may change, not all features (e.g. package RBF) are implemented, etc. If a miner wants to expose this to people, they can effectively use "package relay" before the p2p changes are implemented. However, please note **this is not package relay**; transactions submitted this way will not relay to other nodes if the feerates are below their mempool min fee. Users should put this behind some kind of rate limit or permissions.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 5b878be742
achow101:
ACK 5b878be742
dergoegge:
Code review ACK 5b878be742
ajtowns:
ACK 5b878be742
ariard:
Code Review ACK 5b878be742. Though didn’t manually test the PR.
Tree-SHA512: 610365c0b2ffcccd55dedd1151879c82de1027e3319712bcb11d54f2467afaae4d05dca5f4b25f03354c80845fef538d3938b958174dda8b14c10670537a6524
fa071aeb61 wallet: No BDB creation, unless -deprecatedrpc=create_bdb (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
With BDB being removed soon, it seems confusing and harmful to allow users to create fresh BDB wallets going forward, as it would load them with an additional burden of having to migrate them soon after.
Also, it would be good to allow for one release for test (and external) scripts to adapt.
Fix all issues by introducing the `-deprecatedrpc=create_bdb` setting.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK fa071aeb61
achow101:
ACK fa071aeb61
furszy:
utACK fa071aeb
Tree-SHA512: 37a4c3e4ba659e0ebe2382e71d9c80e42a895d9ad743f5dda7c110fbbb7d2a36f46769982552a9ac0c3a57203379ef164be97aa8033eb7674d6b4da030ba8f9b
a9ef702a87 assumeutxo: change getchainstates RPC to return a list of chainstates (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Current `getchainstates` RPC returns "normal" and "snapshot" fields which are not ideal because it requires new "normal" and "snapshot" terms to be defined, and the definitions are not really consistent with internal code. (In the RPC interface, the "snapshot" chainstate becomes the "normal" chainstate after it is validated, while in internal code there is no "normal chainstate" and the "snapshot chainstate" is still called that temporarily after it is validated).
The current `getchainstates` RPC is also awkward to use if you to want information about the most-work chainstate, because you have to look at the "snapshot" field if it exists, and otherwise fall back to the "normal" field.
Fix these issues by having `getchainstates` just return a flat list of chainstates ordered by work, and adding a new chainstate "validated" field alongside the existing "snapshot_blockhash" field so it is explicit if a chainstate was originally loaded from a snapshot, and whether the snapshot has been validated.
This change was motivated by comment thread in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28562#discussion_r1344154808
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-ACK a9ef702a87
jamesob:
re-ACK a9ef702
achow101:
ACK a9ef702a87
Tree-SHA512: b364e2e96675fb7beaaee60c4dff4b69e6bc2d8a30dea1ba094265633d1cddf9dbf1c5ce20c07d6e23222cf1e92a195acf6227e4901f3962e81a1e53a43490aa
afd9a673c4 test: roundtrip wallet backwards compat downgrade (Andrew Chow)
bbf43c63b9 test: Add 25.0 to wallet backwards compatibiilty test (Andrew Chow)
538939ec39 test: Run upgrade test on all nodes (Andrew Chow)
6d4699028b test: Run downgrade test on descriptor wallets (Andrew Chow)
f158573be1 test: Add 0.21 tr() incompatibility test (Andrew Chow)
f41215c3f0 test: add logging 0.17 incompatibilities in wallet back compat (Andrew Chow)
71c03aeff7 test: Refactor v19 addmultisigaddress test to be distinct (Andrew Chow)
53f35d02cb test: Remove w1_v18 from wallet backwards compatibility (Andrew Chow)
313d665437 test: Fix 0.16 wallet paths and downgrade test (Andrew Chow)
5d8469362a test: Add helper functions for checking node versions (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
It was somewhat surprising to me that wallet_backwards_compatibility.py did not catch #27915 since the purpose of the test is to find downgrade issues such as that. It turns out the test was deficient in several places when it came to testing descriptor wallets, as well as deficient in addition to failing to correctly test some releases.
This PR fixes these test cases, adds more informative logging, slightly refactors the entire test in order to better test future versions, and adds a 25.0 node to the test.
Notable changes:
* The compatibility test with 0.16 should not have been passing. The wallets were being copied incorrectly for 0.16 and resulting in 0.16 creating new wallets rather than testing the target wallets.
* The downgrade test will actually be run on descriptor wallets and it will test that downgrades are successful, and a subsequent upgrade is also successful. This catches #27915.
* The upgrade and downgrade test will be run on all versions up to master, rather than just 0.16, 0.17, and 0.19.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-ACK afd9a673c4
furszy:
ACK afd9a67
Tree-SHA512: dd2d85cab29a636da93020681c533534af4a9cda18d8550c9db9d8937719b3a225025966981c5d4d2f30486448a772b760f0e723a25ea6bc49df80387dc7b8b0
fa28f5a381 test: Bump walletpassphrase timeouts to avoid intermittent issues (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This bumps all timeouts for all `walletpassphrase` to avoid intermittent issues in `valgrind` (or other sanitizers).
As an idea for a follow-up, `walletpassphrase` could be changed to treat `0` as "no timeout" instead of "instant timeout".
Example failure:
```
node0 2023-09-03T22:44:38.374955Z [httpworker.3] [rpc/server.cpp:594] [RPCRunLater] [rpc] queue run of timer lockwallet(w6) in 60 seconds (using HTTP)
test 2023-09-03T22:44:40.173000Z TestFramework.bitcoincli (DEBUG): Running bitcoin-cli ['-rpcwallet=w6', 'getnewaddress', '', 'legacy']
node0 2023-09-03T22:44:59.810893Z [http] [httpserver.cpp:255] [http_request_cb] [http] Received a POST request for /wallet/w6 from 127.0.0.1:48928
node0 2023-09-03T22:44:59.813132Z [httpworker.1] [rpc/request.cpp:181] [parse] [rpc] ThreadRPCServer method=getnewaddress user=__cookie__
node0 2023-09-03T22:44:59.837183Z [httpworker.1] [wallet/sqlite.cpp:53] [TraceSqlCallback] [/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/test_runner/test_runner_₿_🏃_20230903_183350/wallet_createwallet_171/node0/regtest/w6/wallet.dat] SQLite Statement: INSERT or REPLACE into main values(?, ?)
node0 2023-09-03T22:44:59.929735Z [httpworker.1] [wallet/sqlite.cpp:53] [TraceSqlCallback] [/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/test_runner/test_runner_₿_🏃_20230903_183350/wallet_createwallet_171/node0/regtest/w6/wallet.dat] SQLite Statement: INSERT or REPLACE into main values(?, ?)
node0 2023-09-03T22:44:59.934484Z [httpworker.1] [wallet/sqlite.cpp:53] [TraceSqlCallback] [/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/test_runner/test_runner_₿_🏃_20230903_183350/wallet_createwallet_171/node0/regtest/w6/wallet.dat] SQLite Statement: INSERT or REPLACE into main values(?, ?)
node0 2023-09-03T22:44:59.935467Z [httpworker.1] [wallet/sqlite.cpp:53] [TraceSqlCallback] [/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/test_runner/test_runner_₿_🏃_20230903_183350/wallet_createwallet_171/node0/regtest/w6/wallet.dat] SQLite Statement: INSERT or REPLACE into main values(?, ?)
test 2023-09-03T22:45:02.328000Z TestFramework.bitcoincli (DEBUG): Running bitcoin-cli ['-rpcwallet=w6', 'signmessage', 'mqatqH4VQmrZ81nxUfrnfcLnxgbzhZb4PC', 'test']
node0 2023-09-03T22:45:20.269375Z [http] [httpserver.cpp:255] [http_request_cb] [http] Received a POST request for /wallet/w6 from 127.0.0.1:44618
node0 2023-09-03T22:45:20.270670Z [httpworker.2] [rpc/request.cpp:181] [parse] [rpc] ThreadRPCServer method=signmessage user=__cookie__
test 2023-09-03T22:45:23.490000Z TestFramework.bitcoincli (DEBUG): Running bitcoin-cli ['-rpcwallet=w6', 'keypoolrefill', '1']
node0 2023-09-03T22:45:40.244603Z [http] [httpserver.cpp:255] [http_request_cb] [http] Received a POST request for /wallet/w6 from 127.0.0.1:32854
node0 2023-09-03T22:45:40.293021Z [httpworker.0] [rpc/request.cpp:181] [parse] [rpc] ThreadRPCServer method=keypoolrefill user=__cookie__
test 2023-09-03T22:45:41.852000Z TestFramework (ERROR): JSONRPC error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 131, in main
self.run_test()
File "/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/wallet_createwallet.py", line 156, in run_test
w6.keypoolrefill(1)
File "/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/test_node.py", line 732, in __call__
return self.cli.send_cli(self.command, *args, **kwargs)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/test_node.py", line 795, in send_cli
raise JSONRPCException(dict(code=int(code), message=message))
test_framework.authproxy.JSONRPCException: Error: Please enter the wallet passphrase with walletpassphrase first. (-13)
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa28f5a381
Tree-SHA512: 58caa569cec39acc121d4cc038a4190937af34e85d2696272ed4f2792fd386469b0cfefd2cb564438fedded97b21b23d8bf46ba27b5633671a277ed4679f0d5d
Current getchainstates RPC returns "normal" and "snapshot" fields which are not
ideal because it requires new "normal" and "snapshot" terms to be defined, and
the definitions are not really consistent with internal code. (In the RPC
interface, the "snapshot" chainstate becomes the "normal" chainstate after it
is validated, while in internal code there is no "normal chainstate" and the
"snapshot chainstate" is still called that temporarily after it is validated).
The current getchainstatees RPC is also awkward to use if you to want
information about the most-work chainstate because you have to look at the
"snapshot" field if it exists, and otherwise fall back to the "normal" field.
Fix these issues by having getchainstates just return a flat list of
chainstates ordered by work, and adding new chainstate "validated" field
alongside the existing "snapshot_blockhash" so it is explicit if a chainstate
was originally loaded from a snapshot, and whether the snapshot has been
validated.
Making it easier to debug errors in the CI environment,
particularly in scenarios where it's not immediately clear
what happened nor which node crashed (or shutdown abruptly).
d27b9a2248 test: fix feature_init.py file perturbation (Martin Zumsande)
ad66ca1e47 init: abort loading of blockindex in case of missing height. (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
When the block index database is non-contiguous due to file corruption (i.e. it contains indexes of height `x-1` and `x+1`, but not `x`), bitcoind can currently crash with an assert in `BuildSkip()` / `GetAncestor()` during `BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex()`:
```
bitcoind: chain.cpp:112: const CBlockIndex* CBlockIndex::GetAncestor(int) const: Assertion `pindexWalk->pprev' failed.
```
This PR changes it such that we instead return an `InitError` to the user.
I stumbled upon this because I noticed that the file perturbation in `feature_init.py` wasn't working as intended, which is fixed in the second commit:
* Opening the file twice in one `with` statement would lead to `tf_read` being empty, so the test wouldn't perturb anything but replace the file with a new one. Fixed by first opening for read, then for write.
* We need to restore the previous state after perturbations, so that only the current perturbation is active and not a mix of the current and previous ones.
* I also added `checkblocks=200` to the startup parameters so that corruption in earlier blocks of `blk00000.dat` is detected during init verification and not ignored.
After fixing `feature_init.py` like that I'd run into the `assert` mentioned above (so running the testfix from the second commit without the first one is a way to reproduce it).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d27b9a2248
furszy:
Code ACK d27b9a224
fjahr:
Code review ACK d27b9a2248
Tree-SHA512: 2e54da6030c5813c86bd58f816401e090bb43c5b834764a5e3c0e55dbfe09e423f88042cab823db3742088204b274d4ad2abf58a3832a4b18328b11a30bf7094
- make `getaddrmaninfo` RPC public since it's not for development
purposes only and regular users might find it useful
- add missing `all_networks` key to RPC help
- use clang format spacing
352d5eb2a9 test: getrawaddrman RPC (0xb10c)
da384a286b rpc: getrawaddrman for addrman entries (0xb10c)
Pull request description:
Inspired by `getaddrmaninfo` (#27511), this adds a hidden/test-only `getrawaddrman` RPC. The RPC returns information on all addresses in the address manager new and tried tables. Addrman table contents can be used in tests and during development.
The RPC result encodes the `bucket` and `position`, the internal location of addresses in the tables, in the address object's string key. This allows users to choose to consume or to ignore the location information. If the internals of the address manager implementation change, the location encoding might change too.
```
getrawaddrman
EXPERIMENTAL warning: this call may be changed in future releases.
Returns information on all address manager entries for the new and tried tables.
Result:
{ (json object)
"table" : { (json object) buckets with addresses in the address manager table ( new, tried )
"bucket/position" : { (json object) the location in the address manager table (<bucket>/<position>)
"address" : "str", (string) The address of the node
"port" : n, (numeric) The port number of the node
"network" : "str", (string) The network (ipv4, ipv6, onion, i2p, cjdns) of the address
"services" : n, (numeric) The services offered by the node
"time" : xxx, (numeric) The UNIX epoch time when the node was last seen
"source" : "str", (string) The address that relayed the address to us
"source_network" : "str" (string) The network (ipv4, ipv6, onion, i2p, cjdns) of the source address
},
...
},
...
}
Examples:
> bitcoin-cli getrawaddrman
> curl --user myusername --data-binary '{"jsonrpc": "1.0", "id": "curltest", "method": "getrawaddrman", "params": []}' -H 'content-type: text/plain;' http://127.0.0.1:8332/
```
ACKs for top commit:
willcl-ark:
reACK 352d5eb2a9
amitiuttarwar:
reACK 352d5eb2a9
stratospher:
reACK 352d5eb.
achow101:
ACK 352d5eb2a9
Tree-SHA512: cc462666b5c709617c66b0e3e9a17c4c81e9e295f91bdd9572492d1cb6466fc9b6d48ee805ebe82f9f16010798370effe5c8f4db15065b8c7c0d8637675d615e
fa6e6a3f03 doc: Remove confusing assert linter (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `assert()` documentation and linter are redundant and confusing:
* The source code already refuses to compile with `assert()` disabled.
* They violate the assumptions about `Assert()`, which *requires* side effects.
* The existing linter doesn't enforce the guideline, only checking for `++` and `--` side effects.
Fix all issues by removing the docs and the linter. See also https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26684#discussion_r1287370102
Going forward everyone is free to use whatever code in this regard they think is the easiest to read. Also, everyone is still free to share style-nits, if they think it is a good use of their time and of the pull request author. Finally, the author is still free to dismiss or ignore this style-nit, or any other style-nit.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fa6e6a3f03, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
theStack:
ACK fa6e6a3f03
Tree-SHA512: 686738d71e1316cc95e5d3f71869b55a02bfb137c795cc0875057f4410e564bc8eff03c985a2087b007fb08fc84551c7da1e8b30c7a9c3f2b14e5e44a5970236
edbed31066 chainparams: add signet assumeutxo param at height 160_000 (Sjors Provoost)
b8cafe3871 chainparams: add testnet assumeutxo param at height 2_500_000 (Sjors Provoost)
99839bbfa7 doc: add note about confusing HaveTxsDownloaded name (James O'Beirne)
7ee46a755f contrib: add script to demo/test assumeutxo (James O'Beirne)
42cae39356 test: add feature_assumeutxo functional test (James O'Beirne)
0f64bac603 rpc: add getchainstates (James O'Beirne)
bb05857794 refuse to activate a UTXO snapshot if mempool not empty (James O'Beirne)
ce585a9a15 rpc: add loadtxoutset (James O'Beirne)
62ac519e71 validation: do not activate snapshot if behind active chain (James O'Beirne)
9511fb3616 validation: assumeutxo: swap m_mempool on snapshot activation (James O'Beirne)
7fcd21544a blockstorage: segment normal/assumedvalid blockfiles (James O'Beirne)
4c3b8ca35c validation: populate nChainTx value for assumedvalid chainstates (James O'Beirne)
49ef778158 test: adjust chainstate tests to use recognized snapshot base (James O'Beirne)
1019c39982 validation: pruning for multiple chainstates (James O'Beirne)
373cf91531 validation: indexing changes for assumeutxo (James O'Beirne)
1fffdd76a1 net_processing: validationinterface: ignore some events for bg chain (James O'Beirne)
fbe0a7d7ca wallet: validationinterface: only handle active chain notifications (James O'Beirne)
f073917a9e validationinterface: only send zmq notifications for active (James O'Beirne)
4d8f4dcb45 validation: pass ChainstateRole for validationinterface calls (James O'Beirne)
1e59acdf17 validation: only call UpdatedBlockTip for active chainstate (James O'Beirne)
c6af23c517 validation: add ChainstateRole (James O'Beirne)
9f2318c76c validation: MaybeRebalanceCaches when chain leaves IBD (James O'Beirne)
434495a8c1 chainparams: add blockhash to AssumeutxoData (James O'Beirne)
c711ca186f assumeutxo: remove snapshot during -reindex{-chainstate} (James O'Beirne)
c93ef43e4f bugfix: correct is_snapshot_cs in VerifyDB (James O'Beirne)
b73d3bbd23 net_processing: Request assumeutxo background chain blocks (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
- Background and FAQ: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/2019-04-proposal/proposal
- Prior progress/project: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11
- Replaces https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15606, which was closed due to Github slowness. Original description and commentary can be found there.
---
This changeset finishes the first phase of the assumeutxo project. It makes UTXO snapshots loadable via RPC (`loadtxoutset`) and adds `assumeutxo` parameters to chainparams. It contains all the remaining changes necessary to both use an assumedvalid snapshot chainstate and do a full validation sync in the background.
This may look like a lot to review, but note that
- ~200 lines are a (non-essential) demo shell script
- Many lines are functional test, documentation, and relatively dilute RPC code.
So it shouldn't be as burdensome to review as the linecount might suggest.
- **P2P**: minor changes are made to `init.cpp` and `net_processing.cpp` to make simultaneous IBD across multiple chainstates work.
- **Pruning**: implement correct pruning behavior when using a background chainstate
- **Blockfile separation**: to prevent "fragmentation" in blockfile storage, have background chainstates use separate blockfiles from active snapshot chainstates to avoid interleaving heights and impairing pruning.
- **Indexing**: some `CValidationInterface` events are given with an additional parameter, ChainstateRole, and all indexers ignore events from ChainstateRole::ASSUMEDVALID so that indexation only happens sequentially.
- Have `-reindex` properly wipe snapshot chainstates.
- **RPC**: introduce RPC commands `loadtxoutset` and (hidden) `getchainstates`.
- **Release docs & first assumeutxo commitment**: add notes and a particular assumeutxo hash value for first AU-enabled release.
- This will complete the project and allow use of UTXO snapshots for faster node bootstrap.
The next phase, if it were to be pursued, would be coming up with a way to distribute the UTXO snapshots over the P2P network.
---
### UTXO snapshots
Create your own with `./contrib/devtools/utxo_snapshot.sh`, e.g.
```shell
./contrib/devtools/utxo_snapshot.sh 788000 utxo.dat ./src/bitcoin-cli -datadir=$(pwd)/testdata`)
```
or use the pre-generated ones listed below.
- Testnet: **2'500'000** (Sjors):
- torrent: `magnet:?xt=urn:btih:511e09f4bf853aefab00de5c070b1e031f0ecbe9&dn=utxo-testnet-2500000.dat&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.bitcoin.sprovoost.nl%3A6969`
- sha256: `79db4b025448cc0ac388d8589a28eab02de53055d181e34eb47391717aa16388`
- Signet: **160'000** (Sjors):
- torrent: `magnet:?xt=urn:btih:9da986cb27b3980ea7fd06b21e199b148d486880&dn=utxo-signet-160000.dat&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.bitcoin.sprovoost.nl%3A6969`
- sha256: `eeeca845385ba91e84ef58c09d38f98f246a24feadaad57fe1e5874f3f92ef8c`
- Mainnet: **800'000** (Sjors):
- Note: this needs the following commit cherry-picked in: 24deb2022b
- torrent: `magnet:?xt=urn:btih:50ee955bef37f5ec3e5b0df4cf0288af3d715a2e&dn=utxo-800000.dat&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.bitcoin.sprovoost.nl%3A6969`
### Testing
#### For fun (~5min)
If you want to do a quick test, you can run `./contrib/devtools/test_utxo_snapshots.sh` and follow the instructions. This is mostly obviated by the functional tests, though.
#### For real (longer)
If you'd like to experience a real usage of assumeutxo, you can do that too.
I've cut a new snapshot at height 788'000 (http://img.jameso.be/utxo-788000.dat - but you can do it yourself with `./contrib/devtools/utxo_snapshot.sh` if you want). Download that, and then create a datadir for testing:
```sh
$ cd ~/src/bitcoin # or whatever
# get the snapshot
$ curl http://img.jameso.be/utxo-788000.dat > utxo-788000.dat
# you'll want to do this if you like copy/pasting
$ export AU_DATADIR=/home/${USER}/au-test # or wherever
$ mkdir ${AU_DATADIR}
$ vim ${AU_DATADIR}/bitcoin.conf
dbcache=8000 # or, you know, something high
blockfilterindex=1
coinstatsindex=1
prune=3000
logthreadnames=1
```
Obtain this branch, build it, and then start bitcoind:
```sh
$ git remote add jamesob https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin
$ git fetch jamesob assumeutxo
$ git checkout jamesob/assumeutxo
$ ./configure $conf_args && make # (whatever you like to do here)
# start 'er up and watch the logs
$ ./src/bitcoind -datadir=${AU_DATADIR}
```
Then, in some other window, load the snapshot
```sh
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli -datadir=${AU_DATADIR} loadtxoutset $(pwd)/utxo-788000.dat
```
You'll see some log messages about headers retrieval and waiting to see the snapshot in the headers chain. Once you get the full headers chain, you'll spend a decent amount of time (~10min) loading the snapshot, checking it, and flushing it to disk. After all that happens, you should be syncing to tip in pretty short order, and you'll see the occasional `[background validation]` log message go by.
In yet another window, you can check out chainstate status with
```sh
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli -datadir=${AU_DATADIR} getchainstates
```
as well as usual favorites like `getblockchaininfo`.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK edbed31066
Tree-SHA512: 6086fb9a38dc7df85fedc76b30084dd8154617a2a91e89a84fb41326d34ef8e7d7ea593107afba01369093bf8cc91770621d98f0ea42a5b3b99db868d2f14dc2
Test that the getrawaddrman returns the addresses in the new and tried
tables. We can't check the buckets and positions as these are not
deterministic (yet).
380130d9d7 test: add coverage to feature_addrman.py (kevkevin)
Pull request description:
I added two new tests that will cover the nNew and nTried tests which add coverage to the if block by checking values larger than our range since we only check for negative values now
adding coverage to these lines
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/addrman.cpp#L273https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/addrman.cpp#L280
our test seem to only cover the `nTried < 0` and `nNew < 0` scenarios
ACKs for top commit:
ismaelsadeeq:
ACK 380130d9d7, code looks good to me 🍃 .
0xB10C:
Re-ACK 380130d9d7
Tree-SHA512: a063bd9ca4d2d536a27c8c22a28fb13759a96f19cd8ba6cb8879cf7f65046d4ff6e8f70df17feaffd0d0d08ef914cb18a11258d313a4841c811a7e7ae4df6d5b
782701ce7d test: Test loading wallets with conflicts without a chain (Andrew Chow)
4660fc82a1 wallet: Check last block and conflict height are valid in MarkConflicted (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`MarkConflicted` assumes that `m_last_block_processed_height` is always valid. However it may not be valid when a chain is not attached, as happens in the wallet tool and during migration. In such situations, when the conflicting height is also negative (which occurs on loading when no chain is available), the calculation of the number of conflict confirms results in a non-negative value which passes the existing check for valid values. This will subsequently hit an assertion in `GetTxDepthInMainChain`.
Furthermore, `MarkConflicted` is also only called on loading a transaction whose parent has a stored state of `TxStateConflicted` and was loaded before the child transaction. This depends on the loading order, which for both sqlite and bdb depends on the txids.
We can avoid this by explicitly checking that both `m_last_block_processed_height` and `conflicting_height` are non-negative. Both `tool_wallet.py` and `wallet_migration.py` are updated to create wallets with a state that triggers the assertion.
Fixes#28510
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 782701ce7d. Nice catch, and clever test (grinding the txid)
furszy:
ACK 782701ce
Tree-SHA512: 1344e0279ec5413a43a2819d101fb571fbf4821de2d13958a0fdffc99f57082ef3243ec454c8343f97dc02ed1fce8c8b0fd89388420ab2e55618af42ad5630a9
