8ff3743f5e Revert "doc: Remove outdated comments" (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Unfortunately, in #23094 the assumption that #14336 makes comments outdated is wrong. As pointed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23094#discussion_r717226839, the #14336 just moved the relevant code a few lines down.
This PR reverts commit ee7891a0c4, and moves the comments into the right place.
I apologize about that.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 8ff3743f5e
laanwj:
ACK 8ff3743f5e
Tree-SHA512: 84aca627bb5b49c06fc172778f9b9407482c5a873ccbc3dc40167e6a8ad0bc60475d6a469c843b7b42712e35cf3fc2d3518923e791d5e0c59628e042acc72747
90be29c5b5 wallet: enable SQLite extended result codes (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
With this change, we get more fine-grained error messages if something goes wrong in the course of communicating with the SQLite database. To pick some random examples, the error codes SQLITE_IOERR_NOMEM, SQLITE_IOERR_CORRUPTFS or SQLITE_IOERR_FSYNC are way more specific than just a plain SQLITE_IOERR, and the corresponding error messages generated by sqlite3_errstr() will hence give a better hint to the user (or also to the developers, if an error report is sent) what the cause for a failure is.
See the SQLite documentation
https://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/extended_result_codes.htmlhttps://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/c_abort_rollback.html
> In its default configuration, SQLite API routines return one of 30 integer result codes. However, experience has shown that many of these result codes are too coarse-grained. They do not provide as much information about problems as programmers might like. In an effort to address this, newer versions of SQLite (version 3.3.8 2006-10-09 and later) include support for additional result codes that provide more detailed information about errors.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK 90be29c
achow101:
ACK 90be29c5b5
laanwj:
Code review ACK 90be29c5b5
Tree-SHA512: 2b7a60860c206f2b5f8ff9d4a7698efdee897c9ad024621b8fd165b841c20746d9780da3cf46aaf448a777e229a5b3cdf3a4792e8ef82cda9c5d46e354a9a598
451ca244db qt, refactor: Drop intermediate BitcoinApplication::shutdownResult slot (Hennadii Stepanov)
f3a17bbe5f qt: Do not exit and re-enter main event loop during shutdown (Hennadii Stepanov)
b4e0d2c431 qt, refactor: Allocate SendConfirmationDialog instances on heap (Hennadii Stepanov)
332dea2852 qt, refactor: Keep HelpMessageDialog in the main event loop (Hennadii Stepanov)
c8bae37a7a qt, refactor: Keep PSBTOperationsDialog in the main event loop (Hennadii Stepanov)
7fa91e8312 qt, refactor: Keep AskPassphraseDialog in the main event loop (Hennadii Stepanov)
6f6fde30e7 qt, refactor: Keep EditAddressDialog in the main event loop (Hennadii Stepanov)
59f7ba4fd7 qt, refactor: Keep CoinControlDialog in the main event loop (Hennadii Stepanov)
7830cd0b35 qt, refactor: Keep OptionsDialog in the main event loop (Hennadii Stepanov)
13f618818d qt: Add GUIUtil::ShowModalDialogAndDeleteOnClose (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On master (1ef34ee25e) during shutdown `QApplication` exits the main event loop, then re-enter again.
This PR streamlines shutdown process by removing the need to interrupt the main event loop, that is required for #59.
Also, blocking [`QDialog::exec()`](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qdialog.html#exec) calls are replaced with safer [`QDialog::show()`](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qwidget.html#show), except for `SendConfirmationDialog` as that change is not trivial (marked as TODO).
The [`QDialog::open()`](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qdialog.html#open) was not used because the actual modality mode (application modal or window modal) of a dialog depends on whether it has a parent.
This PR does not change behavior, and all touched dialogs are still application modal.
As a follow up, a design research could suggest to make some dialogs window modal.
NOTE for reviewers: quitting app while a dialog is open (e.g., via systray icon menu) must work fine.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review and lighly tested ACK 451ca244db
promag:
ACK 451ca244db, just changed signal to `quitRequested`.
Tree-SHA512: ef01ab6ed803b202e776019a4e1f592e816f7bc786e00574b25a0bf16be2374ddf9db21f0a26da08700df7ef0ab9e879550df46dcfe3b6d940f5ed02ca5f8447
10c6929d55 Include vout when copying transaction ID from coin selection (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
Fixes#432
I think it makes sense to just add the vout to the existing function because I can't imagine a situation where a user in the coin selection dialog would want just the transaction ID rather than the specific outpoint, and they can just delete it from the end anyway.
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
ACK 10c6929d55
hebasto:
ACK 10c6929d55, tested on Linux Mint 20.2 (Qt 5.12.8).
shaavan:
ACK 10c6929
Tree-SHA512: df4d132b6c2fd0b590594e91cf54f82c6c0f77ee9ca06296fb726bc3c52b9ae459ca3b50c48b2bf303ccafe832b6b4dba692a812f439991ca6d807ea0d8df934
a11da75411 bloom: cleanup includes (fanquake)
f1ed1d3194 bloom: use constexpr where appropriate (fanquake)
2ba4ddf31d bloom: use Span instead of std::vector for `insert` and `contains` (William Casarin)
Pull request description:
This is #18985 rebased, with the most recent comments addressed.
> We can avoid many unnecessary std::vector allocations by changing
CBloomFilter to take Spans instead of std::vector's for the `insert`
and `contains` operations.
> CBloomFilter currently converts types such as CDataStream and uint256
to std::vector on `insert` and `contains`. This is unnecessary because
CDataStreams and uint256 are already std::vectors internally. We just
need a way to point to the right data within those types. Span gives
us this ability.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
Code review ACK a11da75411
laanwj:
Code review ACK a11da75411
Tree-SHA512: ee9ba02c9588daa1ff51782d1953fd060839dd15aa85861b2633b6ff2398320188ddd00f01d0c99442224485364ede9f8322366de4239fc7831ebfa06bd34659
bd5c826a96 gui: add RPC setting (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
RPC access is disabled by default for the GUI.
With the proliferation of third party desktop applications that use the Bitcoin Core RPC (e.g. Specter Desktop, Sparrow and Wasabi), this PR makes them slight easier to configure. It's no longer required to find and edit `bitcoin.conf` to add `server=1` to it.
<img width="447" alt="Schermafbeelding 2021-09-02 om 14 25 58" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/131844201-be3b49a8-ae88-47e6-8992-e95ee6b70f69.png">
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK bd5c826a96, tested on Linux Mint 20.2 (Qt 5.12.8):
shaavan:
reACK bd5c826a96
promag:
Code review ACK bd5c826a96. Just minor fixes to the .ui form since last review.
Tree-SHA512: ab377e2358826096b499013bc3a864b7b63dff9859e96041e93ff0897d2319a35e8b3adcfb8df5f83274466c83d040d4ea18c546699421425c835e6f42562ae0
4832737c7d qt: connection type translator comments (Jarol Rodriguez)
Pull request description:
This PR introduces Qt translator comments for `Connection Type` strings in `guiutil.cpp` as well as `rpcconsole.cpp`.
This is an alternate implementation of the idea presented in the last three commits of #289. It is especially inspired by commit 842f4e834dfe5fd2786a5092f78ea28da1b36e4f.
Per [Qt Dev Notes](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/Developer-Notes-for-Qt-Code), it is better to not break up strings when not necessary. This way we preserve the full context for translators.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Code review re-ACK 4832737c7d per `git diff 371e2b9 4832737`, changes are translator comment edits since my review yesterday (thank you for updating)
hebasto:
ACK 4832737c7d
Tree-SHA512: 67e1741e10a2e30cde6d50d3293eec89f0b7641b34463865dc6909d2926cdcf33a7d8c1dc8055d2f85906ad2002cdaa594d37b184d16e2f06614b6c5ad00c982
We can avoid many unnecessary std::vector allocations by changing
CBloomFilter to take Spans instead of std::vector's for the `insert`
and `contains` operations.
CBloomFilter currently converts types such as CDataStream and uint256
to std::vector on `insert` and `contains`. This is unnecessary because
CDataStreams and uint256 are already std::vectors internally. We just
need a way to point to the right data within those types. Span gives
us this ability.
Signed-off-by: William Casarin <jb55@jb55.com>
fa189621cc doc: Remove un-actionable TODO from chainparams.cpp (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This can't be fixed by writing code, see discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23021/files#r717426632
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK fa189621cc
prayank23:
ACK fa189621cc
Tree-SHA512: 3c5c0a0f45d057c9a617797007220837d7dcb29ae5996441e41b3698a67dc3d898f465adc0a958ecef430068cd9c564540bb534bbb3b230a53130ea001629f3e
240ea294d5 doc: update doxygen documention of ComputeTimeSmart() and AddToWalletIfInvolvingMe() regarding rescanning_old_block parameter (BitcoinTsunami)
d6eb39af21 test: add functional test to check transaction time determination during block rescanning (BitcoinTsunami)
07b44f16e7 wallet: fix ComputeTimeSmart algorithm to use blocktime during old block rescanning (BitcoinTsunami)
Pull request description:
The function ComputeTimeSmart in wallet.cpp assume that transaction are discovered in the right order.
Moreover the 'smarttime' determination algorithm is coded with realtime scenario in mind and not rescanning of old block.
The functional test demonstrate that if the user import a wallet, then rescan only recent history, and then rescan the entire history, the older transaction discovered would have an incorrect time determination.
In the context of rescanning old block, the only time value that as a meaning is the blocktime.
That's why I've fixed the problem with a simple separation between rescanning of old block and realtime time determination. The fix is written to have no impact on every realtime scenario and only impact the behaviour during a rescanning process.
This PR Fixes#20181.
To be fair, I don't think that this bug could be triggered with the wallet GUI, because it always proceed with a proper rescan.
But RPC API provide the possibility to trigger it. I've discovered it, because Specter desktop v0.10.0 was impacted. (https://github.com/cryptoadvance/specter-desktop/issues/680).
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 240ea294d5 per `git diff b92d552 240ea29`, re-verified rebase to latest master + debug build clean + new test passes on the branch and fails on master, only change since my review a few hours ago is incorporation of latest review suggestions
meshcollider:
re-utACK 240ea294d5
Tree-SHA512: 514b02e41d011ddfa325f5e8080b93800e1ea4ed5853fa420670a6ac700e8b463000dbea65f8ced8565cfb950c7f51b69154034dcb111e67aca3b964a0061494
ea31caf6b4 update estimatesmartfee rpc to return max of estimateSmartFee, mempoolMinFee and minRelayTxFee. (pranabp-bit)
Pull request description:
This PR is in response to the issue [#19699](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19699).
Based on the discussion in the comments of PR [#22673](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22673) changes have been made in the `estimatesmartfee` itself such that it takes into account `mempoolMinFee` and `relayMinFee` . Hence it provides a fee estimate that is most likely to be paid by the user in an actual transaction, preventing issues such as [#16072](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16072).
The test file test/functional/feature_fee_estimation.py has also been updated to check this functionality.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
re-utACK ea31caf6b4
Tree-SHA512: 8f36153a07cbd552c5c13d11d9c6e987a7a555ea4cc83f2573c0c92dd97c706d90c30a7248671437c2f3a836d3272f8fad53d15a5fa6efaa0409ae8009b0a18d
43cd6b8af9 doc: add release notes for removal of the -deprecatedrpc=addresses flag (Michael Dietz)
2b1fdc2c6c refactor: minor styling, prefer snake case and same line if (Michael Dietz)
d64deac7b8 refactor: share logic between ScriptPubKeyToUniv and ScriptToUniv (Michael Dietz)
8721638daa rpc: remove deprecated addresses and reqSigs from rpc outputs (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
Resolves#21797 now that we've branched-off to v23 ("addresses" and "reqSigs" deprecated) "ExtractDestinations" should be removed.
`-deprecatedrpc=addresses` was initially added in this PR #20286 (which resolved the original issue #20102).
Some chunks of code and logic are no longer used/necessary with the removal of this, and therefore some minor refactoring is done in this PR as well (separated commits)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 43cd6b8af9🐉
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 43cd6b8af9
jonatack:
ACK 43cd6b8af9 per `git range-diff a9d0cec 92dc5e9 43cd6b8`, also rebased to latest master, debug built + quick re-review of each commit to bring back context, and ran tests locally at the final commit
Tree-SHA512: fba83495e396d3c06f0dcf49292f14f4aa6b68fa758f0503941fade1a6e7271cda8378e2734af1faea550d1b43c85a36c52ebcc9dec0732936f9233b4b97901c
03a5fe06bd qt: Keep InitExecutor in main gui thread (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
The `InitExecutor` constructor moves the instance to a dedicated thread. This PR changes that by using `GUIUtil::ObjectInvoke` to run the relevant code in that thread.
A possible follow-up is to ditch the dedicated thread and use `QThreadPool` or even `QtConcurrent::run` (if we want to enable that).
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 03a5fe06bd, tested on Linux Mint 20.2 (Qt 5.12.8).
jarolrod:
ACK 03a5fe06bd
Tree-SHA512: 8b40300371d4c04efb9913600a06ba4899af0b5f50fdb26ea23ec751df6d3bd52f8bd693a5e8f6a94ebf3790583dc96c6070e6878d247dece62347aa9bd99031
This will provide better estimates which would be closer to fee paid in actual
transactions.
The test has also been changed such that when the node is restarted with a
high mempoolMinFee, the estimatesmartfee still returns a feeRate greater
than or equal to the mempoolMinFee, minRelayTxFee.(just like the feeRate of actual transactions)
7e3ee4cdd0 GUI: Ask user to unlock wallet before signing psbt (Samuel Dobson)
0f3acecf33 Add test that walletprocesspsbt requires unlocked wallet when signing (Samuel Dobson)
0e895212bb Ensure wallet is unlocked before signing in walletprocesspsbt (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
If signing a PSBT, we need to ensure the wallet is unlocked.
Fixes#22874, fixesbitcoin-core/gui#312
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 7e3ee4cdd0
lsilva01:
Code Review ACK 7e3ee4cdd0
benthecarman:
ACK 7e3ee4cdd0
Tree-SHA512: 6726a873582747900ab454ea21153a92be86808a4c1517dc2856b389876a2da9e8df1ffa9b567b6bd017038342c3544ecf5ca3c97744e7debe0a5ee65563687d
efcaefc7b5 test: Add remaining scenarios of 0 waste (rajarshimaitra)
Pull request description:
As per the [review club](https://bitcoincore.reviews/22009) discussion on #22009 , it was observed that there were other two fee scenarios in which selection waste could be zero.
These are:
- (LTF - Fee) == Change Cost
- (LTF - Fee) == Excess
Even though these are obvious by the definition of waste metric, adding tests for them can be helpful in explaining its behavior
to new readers of the code base, along with pinning the behavior for future.
This PR adds those two cases to waste calculation unit test.
Also let me know if I am missing more scenarios.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Tested re-ACK efcaefc7b5
achow101:
ACK efcaefc7b5
meshcollider:
ACK efcaefc7b5
Tree-SHA512: 13fe3e2c0ea7bb58d34e16c32908b84705130dec16382ff941e5e60ca5b379f9c5811b33f36c4c72d7a98cfbb6af2f196d0a69e96989afa4b9e49893eaadd7cb
With this change, we get more fine-grained error messages if something
goes wrong in the course of communicating with the SQLite database. To
pick some random examples, the error codes SQLITE_IOERR_NOMEM,
SQLITE_IOERR_CORRUPTFS or SQLITE_IOERR_FSYNC are way more specific than just a
plain SQLITE_IOERR, and the corresponding error messages generated by
sqlite3_errstr() will hence give a better hint to the user (or also to the
developers, if an error report is sent) what the cause for a failure is.
93b9800fec scripted-diff: Rename overloaded int GetArg to GetIntArg (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This is meant to improve readability of code and remove guesswork needed to determine argument types and migrate to [typed arguments (#22978)](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22978) by having distinctly named `GetArg` `GetArgs` `GetBoolArg` and `GetIntArg` methods.
---
This commit was originally part of #22766 and had some review discussion there. But it was [wisely suggested](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22766#issuecomment-910001542) to be split off to make that PR smaller.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 93b9800fec.
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 93b9800fec📨
Tree-SHA512: e034bd938b2c8fbadd90bcd52213a61161965dfddf18c2cb0d68816ecf2438cde8afee6fb7e3418f5c6b35c208338da9deb99e4e418dbf68ca34552e0916a625
dc10ca346b net: switch to signet DNS seed (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
I spun up a DNS seed for Signet, source: https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin-seeder/pull/94
If anyone else spins up a DNS seed, let me know in the comment and I'll add it.
Because one DNS seed is not very diverse, this PR leaves two hardcoded nodes just in case (). The one dropped node no longer exists.
Replaces #23000.
ACKs for top commit:
kallewoof:
utACK dc10ca346b
laanwj:
Concept and code review ACK dc10ca346b
jarolrod:
ACK dc10ca346b
shaavan:
ACK dc10ca346b
Tree-SHA512: 534d189becd51974042fddc3efe3df230484f05cd945e756eaf6a4a8a580e2161b3a959eb3d44dea526269eea6f87a033f7cbfe86586782c6ca4ee7c7c4097a9
b8cd2a4292 Add references for the generator/constant used in Bech32(m) (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
I often find myself recreating this, or looking up references for this construction. So instead, this seems like as good a place as any to place a summary.
ACKs for top commit:
Zero-1729:
crACK b8cd2a4292
Tree-SHA512: 9d2001c5016485cea441c28fda093d67a7d4274e4c1e4dd3d357353ce6a52987e38d684d8462bad2d72ba0b6b1db2f809948e228fb02371e64b12146aace89bd
d2eccacd18 doc: Clarify that change_cost cannot be negative in GetSelectionWaste (benthecarman)
Pull request description:
We assert that the `change_cost` must be positive so we should document it in the function's docs
4f5ad43b1e/src/wallet/coinselection.cpp (L361)
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK d2eccacd18
jarolrod:
ACK d2eccacd18
shaavan:
ACK d2eccacd18
Tree-SHA512: 089bc41d7e212b811455527ce2ac83301eae0edc03933dcbd5229b22078827395c8e3bcfda0ba029b7c60705db3119b4f80e372842a6bd8dae195dbaa0b52833
Improve readability of code, simplify future scripted diff cleanup PRs, and be
more consistent with naming for GetBoolArg.
This will also be useful for replacing runtime settings type checking
with compile time checking.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
git grep -l GetArg | xargs sed -i 's/GetArg(\([^)]*\( [0-9]\+\|-1\|port\|BaseParams().RPCPort()\|Params().GetDefaultPort()\|_TIMEOUT\|Height\|_WORKQUEUE\|_THREADS\|_CONNECTIONS\|LIMIT\|SigOp\|Bytes\|_VERSION\|_AGE\|_CHECKS\|Checks() ? 1 : 0\|_BANTIME\|Cache\|BLOCKS\|LEVEL\|Weight\|Version\|BUFFER\|TARGET\|WEIGHT\|TXN\|TRANSACTIONS\|ADJUSTMENT\|i64\|Size\|nDefault\|_EXPIRY\|HEIGHT\|SIZE\|SNDHWM\|_TIME_MS\)\))/GetIntArg(\1)/g'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
ee7891a0c4 doc: Remove outdated comments (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The first removed comment was introduced in #5288, the second one in #13503.
Both are outdated since #14336.
ACKs for top commit:
duncandean:
crACK ee7891a0
Tree-SHA512: a2d6071919e81c916bfc2178109bbc464417321bcc567ed0644448c5faea8e58cb08a7657afa1b6ffe1fb63e114a2a47b31c893e471839ba9d49a3986e68b2a7
faa9c19a4b doc: Add 23061 release notes (MarcoFalke)
faff17bbde Fix (inverse) meaning of -persistmempool (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Passing `-persistmempool` is currently treated as `-nopersistmempool`
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
reACK faa9c19a4b
hebasto:
ACK faa9c19a4b, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: f34a89a07745dabe340eb845b2a348b79c093e9056f7a21c17e1ba2e278177c9b4cf30e8095791fd645a7f90eb34850b2eee0c869b4f6ec02bf749c73b0e52ee
d96b000e94 Make GUI UTXO lock/unlock persistent (Samuel Dobson)
077154fe69 Add release note for lockunspent change (Samuel Dobson)
719ae927dc Update lockunspent tests for lock persistence (Samuel Dobson)
f13fc16295 Allow lockunspent to store the lock in the wallet DB (Samuel Dobson)
c52789365e Allow locked UTXOs to be store in the wallet database (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
Addresses and closes#22368
As per that issue (and its predecessor #14907), there seems to be some interest in allowing unspent outputs to be locked persistently. This PR does so by adding a flag to lockunspent to store the change in the wallet database. Defaults to false, so there is no change in default behaviour.
Edit: GUI commit changes default behaviour. UTXOs locked/unlocked via the GUI are now persistent.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d96b000e94
kristapsk:
ACK d96b000e94
lsilva01:
Tested ACK d96b000e94 on Ubuntu 20.04
prayank23:
ACK d96b000e94
Tree-SHA512: 957a5bbfe7f763036796906ccb1598feb6c14c5975838be1ba24a198840bf59e83233165cb112cebae909b6b25bf27275a4d7fa425923ef6c788ff671d7a89a8
