710b83938a rpc: return block hash & height in getbalances, gettransaction & getwalletinfo JSONs (Harris)
Pull request description:
Reopens#18570 and closes#18567.
I have rebased the original PR.
Not sure why the original got closed as it was about to get merged.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 710b83938a
Tree-SHA512: d4478d990be98b1642e9ffb2930987f4a224e8bd64e2e35a5dda927a54c509ec9d712cd0eac35dc2bb89f00a1678e530ce14d7445f1dd93aa3a4cce2bc9b130d
24d55fb9cf test: added coverage to rpc_scantxoutset.py (kevkevin)
Pull request description:
Included a test that checks if an invalid first argument is entered we receive a rpc error. The rpc should fail if "start", "status" or "abort" is not the first command.
Relavant: mentioned in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27422
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 24d55fb9cf
theStack:
ACK 24d55fb9cf
Tree-SHA512: 4b804235d3fa17c7bf492068ab47c1f87cb6cfc1a428c51e273ec059d3c41f581bcc467bb5d6d8bbf2fab14c60cd1c52a30c50009efe1c9b5adee70c88897ad9
82e6e3cae5 test: add ripemd160 to test framework modules list (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Currently test runner doesn't execute the unit tests of the ripemd160 module, so add it to the list. All other framework modules that contain unit tests are included, as can be easily checked via
`$ git grep unittest.TestCase ./test/functional/test_framework/`
This is a late follow-up to PR #23716 (commit ad3e9e1f21).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 82e6e3cae5
Tree-SHA512: 10940e215f728291c7149931a356bfc42795c098bda76d760dfa68f86443a3755e1cd35cb9a8a7b2f48880beb53f3bee3842de2d74bcadd45c7b05c13ff04203
Currently test runner doesn't execute the unit tests of the ripemd160
module, so add it to the list. All other framework modules that contain
unit tests are included, as can be easily checked via
`git grep unittest.TestCase ./test/functional/test_framework/`
This is a late follow-up to PR #23716 (commit
ad3e9e1f21).
Included a test that checks if an invalid first argument is entered we
receive a rpc error. The rpc should fail if "start", "status" or "abort"
is not the first command.
8f14fc8622 test: cover fastprune with excessive block size (Matthew Zipkin)
271c23e87f blockstorage: Adjust fastprune limit if block exceeds blockfile size (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
The debug-only `-fastprune` option used in several tests is not always safe to use:
If a `-fastprune` node receives a block larger than the maximum blockfile size of `64kb` bad things happen: The while loop in `BlockManager::FindBlockPos` never terminates, and the node runs oom because memory for `m_blockfile_info` is allocated in each iteration of the loop.
The same would happen if a naive user used `-fastprune` on anything other than regtest (so this can be tested by syncing on signet for example, the first block that crashes the node is at height 2232).
Change the approach by raising the blockfile size to the size of the block, if that block otherwise wouldn't fit (idea by TheCharlatan).
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 8f14fc8622. Added new assert, test, and comment since last review
TheCharlatan:
ACK 8f14fc8622
pinheadmz:
ACK 8f14fc8622
Tree-SHA512: df2fea30613ef9d40ebbc2416eacb574f6d7d96847db5c33dda22a29a2c61a8db831aa9552734ea4477e097f253dbcb6dcb1395d43d2a090cc0588c9ce66eac3
dc14ba08e6 test: remove modinv python util helper function (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Since #27483 was merged the `modinv()` body is just one line calling pythons own implementation of `pow()`. We can just remove the function as it doesn't seem to add any value. Additionally the comment in the function is now outdated and the test is only testing two ways of doing modular inverse but both using python's `pow()` function.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK dc14ba08e6
Tree-SHA512: e8b470c72dc3f9fd53699d0684650517b1ea35ad1d4c01cf9472c80d3e4474c0c72e429c0bd201eb99d204c87eee0d68285e6a388e4c506f30e14b2bff9c1c32
057057a2d7 Add test for `sendmany` rpc that uses `subtractfeefrom` parameter (Yusuf Sahin HAMZA)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test that uses `sendmany` rpc to send **BTC** to multiple addresses using `subtractfeefrom` parameter, then checks receiver addresses balances to make sure fees are subtracted correctly.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 057057a2d7
Tree-SHA512: 51167120d489f0ff7b8b9855424d07cb55a8965984f904643cddf45e7a08c350eaded498c350ec9c660edf72c2f128ec142347c9c79d5043d9f6cd481b15cd7e
9c18992bba test: add coverage for `-bantime` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for `-bantime`. This flag sets the time in seconds how long the IP is banned (in the case you don't explicitly set `bantime` when using `setban`).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 9c18992bba
Tree-SHA512: e95f8608aa5df9b09cc5577daae662ed79ef5d5c69ee5e704d7c69520b9b51cc142e9e6be69d80356eda25a5215c4770b1a208638560c48cd3bc8f6d195a371f
b922f6b526 rpc: scanblocks, add "completed" flag to the result obj (furszy)
ce50acc54f rpc: scanblocks, do not traverse the whole chain block by block (furszy)
Pull request description:
Coming from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23549#pullrequestreview-1105712566
The current `scanblocks` flow walks-through every block in the active chain
until hits the chain tip or processes 10k blocks, then calls `lookupFilterRange`
function to obtain all filters from that particular range.
This is only done to obtain the heights range to look up the block
filters. Which is unneeded.
As `scanblocks` only lookup block filters in the active chain, we can
directly calculate the lookup range heights, by using the chain tip,
without requiring to traverse the chain block by block.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK b922f6b526
TheCharlatan:
ACK b922f6b526
Tree-SHA512: 0587e6d9cf87a59184adb2dbc26a4e2bce3a16233594c6c330f69feb49bf7dc63fdacf44fc20308e93441159ebc604c63eb7de19204d3e745a2ff16004892b45
be72663a15 test: bumpfee, add coverage for "send coins back to yourself" (furszy)
7bffec6715 bumpfee: enable send coins back to yourself (furszy)
Pull request description:
Simple example:
1) User_1 sends 0.1 btc to user_2 on a low fee transaction.
2) After few hours, the tx is still in the mempool, user_2
is not interested anymore, so user_1 decides to cancel
it by sending coins back to himself.
3) User_1 has the bright idea of opening the explorer and
copy the change output address of the transaction. Then
call bumpfee providing such output (in the "outputs" arg).
Currently, this is not possible. The wallet fails with
"Unable to create transaction. Transaction must have at least
one recipient" error.
The error reason is because we discard the provided output
from the recipients list and set it inside the coin control
so the process adds it later (when the change is calculated).
But.. there is no later if the tx has no outputs.
ACKs for top commit:
ishaanam:
reACK be72663a15
achow101:
ACK be72663a15
Tree-SHA512: c2c38290a998f9b426a830d9624c7feb730158980ac186f8fb0138d5e200935d6538307bc60a2c3d0b7b6ee2b4ffb77a1e98baf8feb1d20a7d825f6055ac377f
To tell the user whether the process was aborted or not.
Plus, as the process can be aborted prior to the end range,
have also changed the "to_height" result value to return the
last scanned block instead of the end range block.
fac395e5eb ci: Bump ci/lint/Dockerfile (MarcoFalke)
fa6eb65167 test: Use python3.8 pow() (MarcoFalke)
88881cf7ac Bump python minimum version to 3.8 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
There is no pressing reason to drop support for 3.7, however there are several maintenance issues:
* There is no supported operating system that ships 3.7 by default. (debian:buster is EOL and unmaintained to the extent that it doesn't run in the CI environment. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27340#issuecomment-1484988445)
* Compiling python 3.7 from source is also unsupported on at least macos, according to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24017#issuecomment-1107820790
* Recent versions of lief require 3.8, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27507#issuecomment-1517561645
Fix all maintenance issues by bumping the minimum.
ACKs for top commit:
RandyMcMillan:
ACK fac395e
fjahr:
ACK fac395e5eb
fanquake:
ACK fac395e5eb
Tree-SHA512: c198decdbbe29d186d73ea3f6549d8a38479383495d14a965a2f9211ce39637b43f13a4c2a5d3bf56e2d468be4bbe49b4ee8e8e19ec69936ff43ddf2b714c712
33fdfc7986 test: perturb anchors.dat to test it doesn't throw an error during initialization (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Got some inspiration from `feature_init`. This PR tests whether perturbing `anchors.dat` doesn't throw any error during initialization.
3f1f5f6f1e/src/addrdb.cpp (L223-L235)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 33fdfc7986
Tree-SHA512: e6584debb37647677581fda08366b45b42803022cc4c4f1d5a7bd5e9e04d64da77656dad2b804855337487bdcfc891f300a2e03668d6122de769dd14f39af9ed
4bdcf57158 test: test banlist database recreation (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for 'banlist database recreation'. If it wasn't able to read ban db (in `LoadBanlist`), so it should create a new (an empty, ofc) one.
d8bdee0fc8/src/banman.cpp (L28-L45)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 4bdcf57158
Tree-SHA512: d9d0cd0c4b3797189dff00d3a634878188e7cf51e78346601fc97e2bf78c495561705214062bb42ab8e491e0d111f8bfcf74dbc801768bc02cf2b45f162aad85
cca4f82b82 test: add coverage for rpc error when trying to rescan beyond pruned data (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following rpc error:
15692e2641/src/wallet/rpc/transactions.cpp (L896-L899)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK cca4f82b82
aureleoules:
ACK cca4f82b82
Tree-SHA512: 724a055e9f6cddf1935699e8769015115f24f6485a0bd87e8660072ee44a15c1bddfdda848acc101ea7184b7e65a33b5b0d80b563d2ba3ecdab7a631378d6476
0c520679ab doc: add release notes for `abandoned` field in `gettransaction` and `listtransactions` (brunoerg)
a1aaa7f51f rpc, wallet: add `abandoned` field for all categories of transactions in ListTransactions (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Fixes#25130
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 0c520679ab
Tree-SHA512: 1864460d76decab7898737c96517d722055eb8f81ca52248fe1035723258c6cd4a93251e06a86ecbbb0b0a80af1466b2c86fb142ace4ccb74cc40d5dc3967d7f
bf77fc9cb4 [test] mempool full in package accept (glozow)
b51ebccc28 [validation] set PackageValidationState when mempool full (glozow)
563a2ee4f5 [policy] disallow transactions under min relay fee, even in packages (glozow)
c4554fe894 [test] package cpfp bumps parents <mempoolminfee but >=minrelaytxfee (glozow)
ac463e87df [test util] mock mempool minimum feerate (glozow)
Pull request description:
Part of package relay, see #27463.
Note that this still allows packages to bump transactions that are below the dynamic mempool minimum feerate, which means this still solves the "mempool is congested and my presigned 1sat/vB tx is screwed" problem for all transactions.
On master, the package policy (only accessible through regtest-only RPC submitpackage) allows 0-fee (or otherwise below min relay feerate) transactions if they are bumped by a child. However, with default package limits, we don't yet have a DoS-resistant way of ensuring these transactions remain bumped throughout their time in the mempool. Primarily, the fee-bumping child may later be replaced by another transaction that doesn't bump the parent(s). The parent(s) could potentially stay bumped by other transactions, but not enough to ever be selected by the `BlockAssembler` (due to `blockmintxfee`).
For example, (tested [here](https://github.com/glozow/bitcoin/commits/26933-motivation)):
- The mempool accepts 24 below-minrelayfeerate transactions ("0-fee parents"), all bumped by a single high-fee transaction ("the fee-bumping child"). The fee-bumping child also spends a confirmed UTXO.
- Two additional children are added to each 0-fee parent. These children each pay a feerate slightly above the minimum relay feerate (e.g. 1.9sat/vB) such that, for each 0-fee parent, the total fees of its two children divided by the total size of the children and parent is above the minimum relay feerate.
- If a block template is built now, all transactions would be selected.
- A transaction replaces the the fee-bumping child, spending only the confirmed UTXO and not any of the outputs from the 0-fee parents.
- The 0-fee parents now each have 2 children. Their descendant feerates are above minrelayfeerate, which means that they remain in the mempool, even if the mempool evicts all below-minrelayfeerate packages.
- If a block template is built now, none of the 0-fee parents or their children would be selected.
- Even more low-feerate descendants can be added to these below-minrelayfeerate packages and they will not be evicted until they expire or the mempool reaches capacity.
Unless we have a DoS-resistant way of ensuring package CPFP-bumped transactions are always bumped, allowing package CPFP to bump below-minrelayfeerate transactions can result in these problematic situations. See #27018 which proposes a partial solution with some limitations, and contains discussion about potential improvements to eviction strategy. While no adequate solution exists, for now, avoid these situations by requiring all transactions to meet min relay feerate.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
reACK bf77fc9cb4
instagibbs:
re-ACK bf77fc9cb4
Tree-SHA512: 28940f41493a9e280b010284316fb8caf1ed7b2090ba9a4ef8a3b2eafc5933601074b142f4f7d4e3c6c4cce99d3146f5c8e1393d9406c6f2070dd41c817985c9
These routines look fancy, but do nothing more than converting between
byte objects of length 32 to/from integers in little endian byte order
and can be replaced by simple one-liners, using the int.{from,to}_bytes
methods (available since Python 3.2).
6e9f8bb050 rpc, tests: in `utxoupdatepsbt` also look for the transaction in the txindex (ishaanam)
a5b4883fb4 rpc: extract psbt updating logic into ProcessPSBT (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
Previously the `utxoupdatepsbt` RPC, added in #13932, only updated the inputs spending segwit outputs with the `witness_utxo`, because the full transaction is needed for legacy inputs. Before this RPC looked for just the utxos in the utxo set and the mempool. This PR makes it so that if the user has txindex enabled, then the full transaction is looked for there for all inputs. If it is not found in the txindex or txindex isn't enabled, then the mempool is checked for the full transaction. If the transaction an input is spending from is still not found at that point, then the utxo set is searched and the inputs spending segwit outputs are updated with just the utxo.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 6e9f8bb050
Xekyo:
ACK 6e9f8bb050
Tree-SHA512: 078db3c37a1ecd5816d80a42e8bd1341e416d661f508fa5fce0f4e1249fefd7b92a0d45f44957781cb69d0953145ef096ecdd4545ada39062be27742402dac6f
Prior to PR #27468 (commit 11422cc572) all
call-sites of `GetQueryParameter(...)` in the REST module could trigger
a crash. Add missing test cases for all possible code-paths as a
regression test, as a foundation for possible follow-up fixes (which aim
to resolve this issue in a more general and robust way).
e07dd5fff9 test: fix bumpfee 'spend_one_input' occasional failure (furszy)
Pull request description:
CI test failure, in master: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5975232842825728.
In #27469https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6452468402356224
Most of the subtests in `wallet_bumpfee.py` expect to find spendable UTXOs of 0.001 btc in the rbf wallet. They use the `spend_one_input()` method which fails if none of them exist.
The sporadic failure comes from the recently added `test_feerate_checks_replaced_outputs` subtest that can spend all them. Leaving the next subtests with no 0.001 UTXOs to spend.
To solve it, this PR moves the recently added case into a "context independent subtests" section.
Which is placed at the end to not affect other cases.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e07dd5fff9
pablomartin4btc:
ACK e07dd5fff9.
Tree-SHA512: c150ed6fcfbb6f1502eaf6370a57aae0da991c0fc48e8bb3d446805f4336abba5d80ff0de26094914da95432dd0255030fe527001af4510dfdcefbc7230f14d6
`evhttp_uri_parse` can return a nullptr, for example when the URI
contains invalid characters (e.g. "%").
`GetQueryParameterFromUri` passes the output of `evhttp_uri_parse`
straight into `evhttp_uri_get_query`, which means that anyone calling
a REST endpoint in which query parameters are used (e.g. `rest_headers`)
can cause a segfault.
This bugfix is designed to be minimal and without additional behaviour change.
Follow-up work should be done to resolve this in a more general and robust way,
so not every endpoint has to handle it individually.
Most of the subtests in wallet_bumpfee.py expect to
find spendable UTXOs of 0.001 btc in the rbf wallet
(they use the 'spend_one_input()' method that tries
to spend one of them and if it doesn't find any, it
throws an exception).
The sporadic failure comes from the recently added
'test_feerate_checks_replaced_outputs' subtest that
can spend all them. Leaving the next subtests with
no 0.001 UTXOs to spend.
To solve it, this PR moves the recently added case
into a "context independent subtests" section.
Which is placed at the end to not affect other cases.
d52fa1b0a5 tests: Make sure that bumpfee feerate checks work when replacing outputs (Andrew Chow)
be177c15a4 bumpfee: Check the correct feerate when replacing outputs (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When replacing the outputs of a transaction during `bumpfee`, it is possible to accidentally create a transaction that will not be accepted into the mempool as it does not meet the incremental relay fee requirements. This occurs because the size estimation used for checking the provided feerate does not account for the replaced outputs; it instead uses the original outputs. When the replaced outputs is significantly different from the original, there can be a large difference in estimated transaction sizes that can make a transaction miss the absolute fee requirements for the incremental relay fee. Unfortunately we do not currently inform the user when the bumped transaction fails to relay, so they could use `bumpfee` and think the transaction has been bumped when it actually has not.
This issue is resolved by replacing the outputs before doing the size estimation, and also updating the feerate checker to use the actual fee values when calculating the required minimum fee.
Also added a test for this scenario.
ACKs for top commit:
ishaanam:
reACK d52fa1b0a5
Xekyo:
reACK d52fa1b0a5
Tree-SHA512: d18301b587465322dd3fb1bb86496c3675265a56072047576e2baa5cf907dd3b54778f30721f662f0c235709a5568427c18542eb7efbfb6fdd9f481fe676c66b
7ccdd741fe test: fix importmulti/importdescriptors assertion (Jon Atack)
19d888ce40 rpc: move WALLET_FLAG_CAVEATS to the compilation unit of its caller (Jon Atack)
01df011ca2 doc: release note for wallet RPCs "warning" field deprecation (Jon Atack)
9ea8b3739a test: createwallet "warning" field deprecation test (Jon Atack)
645d7f75ac rpc: deprecate "warning" field in {create,load,unload,restore}wallet (Jon Atack)
2f4a926e95 test: add test coverage for "warnings" field in createwallet (Jon Atack)
4a1e479ca6 rpc: add "warnings" field to RPCs {create,load,unload,restore}wallet (Jon Atack)
079d8cdda8 rpc: extract wallet "warnings" fields to a util helper (Jon Atack)
f73782a903 doc: fix/improve warning helps in {create,load,unload,restore}wallet (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Based on discussion and concept ACKed in #27138, add a `warnings` field to RPCs createwallet, loadwallet, unloadwallet, and restorewallet as a JSON array of strings to replace the `warning` string field in these 4 RPCs. The idea is to more gracefully handle multiple warning messages and for consistency with other wallet RPCs. Then, deprecate the latter fields, which represent all the remaining RPC `warning` fields.
The first commit f73782a903 implements https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27138#issuecomment-1474789198 as an alternative to #27138. One of those two could potentially be backported to our currently supported releases.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 7ccdd741fe
1440000bytes:
utACK 7ccdd741fe
vasild:
ACK 7ccdd741fe
pinheadmz:
re-ACK 7ccdd741fe
Tree-SHA512: 314e0a4c41fa383d95e2817bfacf359d449e460529d235c3eb902851e2f4eacbabe646d9a5a4beabc4964cdfabf6397ed8301366a58d344a2f787f83b75e9d64
Instead of storing and passing around fixed strings for the purpose of
an address, use an enum.
This also rationalizes the CAddressBookData struct, documenting all fields and
making them public, and simplifying the representation to avoid bugs like
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26761#discussion_r1134615114 and make
it not possible to invalid address data like change addresses with labels.
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
When replacing the outputs of a transaction, we can end up with
fees that are drastically different from the original. This tests that
the feerate checks we perform will properly detect when the bumping tx
will have an insufficient feerate.
f842ed9a40 test: refactor: replace unnecessary `BytesIO` uses (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Rather than needing to create intermediate stream variables, we can use helper functions like `tx_from_hex` instead or access the result directly, leading both to increased readability and less code.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
ACK f842ed9a40
brunoerg:
crACK f842ed9a40
aureleoules:
ACK f842ed9a40 - It seems that these are the only instances that can be changed and it simplifies test code.
Tree-SHA512: 7f4fd7a26720d1988bf27f66c817ff6cd7060350a3be62d28e7848c768fd43578719ca475193d4057ccf4f2458af18564fd513fe3a1d458a11c799927c12bd65
Rather than needing to create intermediate stream variables, we can use
helper functions like `tx_from_hex` instead or access the result
directly, leading both to increased readability and less code.
Also, move the burden of checking for a timeout to the client and
disable the timeout on the server. This should avoid intermittent issues
in slow tests (for example mining_getblocktemplate_longpoll.py, or
feature_dbcrash.py), or possibly when the server is running slow (for
example in valgrind). There shouldn't be any downside in tests caused
by a high rpcservertimeout.
e669833943 test: dedup package limit checks via decorator in mempool_package_limits.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
72f25e238c test: refactor: use Satoshis for fees in mempool_package_limits.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The subtests in the functional test mempool_package_limits.py all follow the same pattern:
1. first, check that the mempool is currently empty
2. create and submit certain single txs to the mempool, prepare list of hex transactions
3. check that `testmempoolaccept` on the package hex fails with a "package-mempool-limits" error on each tx result
4. after mining a block, check that submitting the package succeeds
Note that steps 1,3,4 are identical for each of the subtests and only step 2 varies, so this might be a nice opportunity to deduplicate code by using a newly introduced decorator which executes the necessary before and after the essential part of the subtest. This also makes it easier to add new subtests without having to copy-paste those parts once again.
In addition, the first commit switches the fee unit from BTC to Satoshis, which allows to get rid of some imports (`COIN` and `Decimal`) and a comment for the `test_desc_size_limits` subtest is fixed (s/25KvB/21KvB/).
ACKs for top commit:
ismaelsadeeq:
ACK e669833943
glozow:
utACK e669833943
Tree-SHA512: 84a85e739de7387391c13bd46aeb015a74302ea7c6f0ca3d4e2b1b487d38df390dc118eb5b1c11d3e4206bff316a4dab60ef6b25d8feced672345d4e36ffd205
e47ce42f67 refactor: use address_to_scriptpubkey to retrieve addresses scriptpubkey (ismaelsadeeq)
4142d19d74 refactor: move address_to_scriptpubkey to address.py (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
PR #27269 enables the function address_to_scriptpubkey() to decode all address types and return their corresponding scriptpubkeys. As a result, there is no longer any need to call getaddressinfo or validateaddress RPCs in order to retrieve an address scriptpubkey, as explained in the comments on this pull request (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27269#pullrequestreview-1353681933 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27269#issuecomment-1481016118).
Instead of using RPC calls, this update replaces the process of obtaining an address scriptPubkey with the address_to_scriptpubkey method, resulting in improved performance for functional tests.
ACKs for top commit:
josibake:
re-ACK e47ce42f67
theStack:
ACK e47ce42f67🌱
Tree-SHA512: 05285349a7d5ce7097b8f2582e573a5135c6deef85ea9936f68f6ce94e9ebb1d84d94f7fc7e5ed833a698e01585addd80deb52e6338f8aee985bf14db45417d2
This avoids having to convert from BTC to Sats and needs less imports.
Also specify the tx's target size in vsize rather than in weight, which
allows us to specify the fee-rate by a simple multiplication, rather
than having another magic number for it.
This commit updates the code by replacing the RPC call used to
decode an address and retrieve its corresponding scriptpubkey
with the address_to_scriptpubkey function. address_to_scriptpubkey
function can now decode all addresses formats, which makes
it more efficient to use.
