The getblockstats RPC functional test is using previously generated test data that is part of the repository. That test data can be regenerated by running the test file with `--gen-test-data` which invokes the `generate_test_data()` function. That function still relied on the old wallet behavior of having a default wallet to work. Because of this the function was broken and this change fixes this. The fact that this was broken did was not noticed previously because the function is not used by the automated test suite by default.
- Fix getblockstats for block height 0 which previously returned an error.
- Introduce alternative utxo_*_actual statistics which exclude unspendables: Genesis block, BIP30, unspendable outputs
- Update test data
- Explicitly test Genesis block results
dddd1acf58 net: Set relay in version msg to peers with relay permission (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Seems odd to set the `relay` permission in -blocksonly mode and also ask the peer not to relay transactions.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
ACK dddd1acf58
naumenkogs:
ACK dddd1acf58
mzumsande:
ACK dddd1acf58
Tree-SHA512: 7bb0e964993ea4982747ae2801fe963ff88586e2ded03015b60ab83172b5b61f2d50e9cde9d7711b7ab207f8639467ecafc4d011ea151ec6c82c722f510f4df7
deba6fe315 test: update feature_config_args.py (josibake)
2e3826cbcd util: warn if reindex is used in conf (josibake)
5e744f4238 util: disallow setting conf in bitcoin.conf (josibake)
Pull request description:
In help from `bitcoind -h` it specifes that `conf` can only be used from the commandline. However, if `conf` is set in a `bitcoin.conf` file, there is no error and from reading the logs it seems as if the `conf=<other file>` is being used, despite it being ignored. To recreate, you can setup a `bitcoin.conf` file in the default directory, add `conf=<some other file>.conf` and in the separate config file set whichever config value you want and verify that it is being ignored. alternatively, if you set `includeconf=<some other file>.conf` , your config in `<some other file>` will be picked up.
This PR fixes this by having the node error when reading the config file if `conf=` is set.
Additionally, it was mentioned in a recent [PR review club](https://bitcoincore.reviews/24858) that if `reindex=1` is set in the config file, the node will reindex on every startup, which is undesirable:
```irc
17:14 <larryruane> michaelfolkson: Reindex is requested by the user (node operator) as a configuration option (command line or in the config file, tho you probably would never put it in the file, or else it would reindex on every startup!)
```
This PR also has a commit to warn if `reindex=1` is set in the config file.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK deba6fe315, tested on Ubuntu 22.04.
aureleoules:
tACK deba6fe315
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK deba6fe315.
Tree-SHA512: 619fd0aa14e98af1166d6beb92651f5ba3f10d38b8ee132957f094f19c3a37313d9f4d7be2e4019f3fc9a2ca5fa42d03eb539ad820e27efec7ee58a26eb520b1
315fd4dbab test: Test for out of bounds vout in sendall (Andrew Chow)
b132c85650 wallet: Check utxo prevout index out of bounds in sendall (Andrew Chow)
708b72b715 test: Test that sendall works with watchonly spending specific utxos (Andrew Chow)
6bcd7e2a3b wallet: Correctly check ismine for sendall (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The `sendall` RPC would previously fail when used with a watchonly wallet and specified inputs. This failure was caused by checking isminetype equality with ISMINE_ALL rather than a bitwise AND as IsMine can never return ISMINE_ALL.
Also added a test.
ACKs for top commit:
w0xlt:
ACK 315fd4dbab
furszy:
ACK 315fd4db
Tree-SHA512: fb55cf6524e789964770b803f401027319f0351433ea084ffa7c5e6f1797567a608c956b7f7c5bd542aa172c4b7b38b07d0976f5ec587569efead27266e8664c
e133264c5b Add test for PSBT input verification (Greg Sanders)
d25699280a Verify PSBT inputs rather than check for fields being empty (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
In a few keys spots, PSBT finality is checked by looking for non-empty witness data.
This complicates a couple things:
1) Empty data can be valid in certain cases
2) User may be passed bogus final data by a counterparty during PSBT work happening, and end up with incorrect signatures that they may not be able to check in other contexts if the UTXO doesn't exist yet in chain/mempool, timelocks, etc.
On the whole I think these heavier checks are worth it in case someone is actually assuming the signatures are correct if our API is saying so.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e133264c5b
Tree-SHA512: 9de4fbb0be1257b081781f5df908fd55666e3acd5c4e36beb3b3f2f5a6aed69ff77068c44cde6127e159e773293fd9ced4c0bb47e693969f337e74dc8af030da
4aff7a48a4 test: check importing wallets when blocks are pruned throw an error (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following error:
437b608df2/src/wallet/rpc/backup.cpp (L513-L518)
ACKs for top commit:
andrewtoth:
ACK 4aff7a48a4
Tree-SHA512: fbbf6056cb3759f726b8a5ff25fca51bf47e973e5d655ec164e2bec88e2dbd3b243677869d2cf33af268ea635ca0f2e9f737c4734077fc5a936ac3a24ad4b88b
a8250e30f1 doc: add release note about `/rest/deploymentinfo` (brunoerg)
5c96020024 doc: add `/deploymentinfo` in REST-interface (brunoerg)
3e44bee08e test: add coverage for `/rest/deploymentinfo` (brunoerg)
91497031cb rest: add `/deploymentinfo` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
#23508 added a new RPC named `getdeploymentinfo`, it moved the softfork section from `getblockchaininfo` into this new one. In the REST interface, we have an endpoint named`/rest/chaininfo.json` (which refers to `getblockchaininfo`), so, this PR adds a new REST endpoint named `/deploymentinfo` which refers to `getdeploymentinfo`.
You can use it by passing a block hash, e.g: '/rest/deploymentinfo/<BLOCKHASH>.json' or you can use it without passing a block hash to get the 'deploymentinfo' for the last block.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK a8250e30f1 rebase-only since my last review at c65f82bb
achow101:
ACK a8250e30f1
stickies-v:
re-ACK a8250e30f1
Tree-SHA512: 0735183b6828d51a72ed0e2be5a09b314ac4693f548982c6e9adaa0ef07a55aa428d3b2d1b1de70b83169811a663a8624b686166e5797f624dcc00178b9796e6
bff05bd745 test: add functional test for -discover (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a functional test for `-discover`. It tests different scenarios where `localaddresses` should be empty or may contain the addresses. Obs: `localaddresses` is not always accurate, so it's not possible to ensure (100%) it will contain any addresses.
515200298b/src/init.cpp (L449)
Obs: See #24258 - It adds test coverage for this field but for nodes with proxy.
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code review ACK bff05bd745
achow101:
ACK bff05bd745
rajarshimaitra:
tACK bff05bd745
Tree-SHA512: 8782497c146bce1ba86fda6146f3847465d7069f2cb6b84f2afc8f3b43efa813442bffe7447e9ce02adee304100b60365409bf0e5d875dfb880038442feec2a6
626b7c8493 fuzz: add scanblocks as safe for fuzzing (James O'Beirne)
94fe5453c7 test: rpc: add scanblocks functional test (Jonas Schnelli)
6ef2566b68 rpc: add scanblocks - scan for relevant blocks with descriptors (Jonas Schnelli)
a4258f6e81 rpc: move-only: consolidate blockchain scan args (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
Revives #20664. All feedback from the previous PR has either been responded to inline or incorporated here.
---
Major changes from Jonas' PR:
- consolidated arguments for scantxoutset/scanblocks
- substantial cleanup of the functional test
Here's the range-diff (`git range-diff master jonasschnelli/2020/12/filterblocks_rpc jamesob/2021-11-scanblocks`): https://gist.github.com/jamesob/aa4a975344209f0316444b8de2ec1d18
### Original PR description
> The `scanblocks` RPC call allows one to get relevant blockhashes from a set of descriptors by scanning all blockfilters in a given range.
>
> **Example:**
>
> `scanblocks start '["addr(<bitcoin_address>)"]' 661000` (returns relevant blockhashes for `<bitcoin_address>` from blockrange 661000->tip)
>
> ## Why is this useful?
> **Fast wallet rescans**: get the relevant blocks and only rescan those via `rescanblockchain getblockheader(<hash>)[height] getblockheader(<hash>)[height])`. A future PR may add an option to allow to provide an array of blockhashes to `rescanblockchain`.
>
> **prune wallet rescans**: (_needs additional changes_): together with a call to fetch blocks from the p2p network if they have been pruned, it would allow to rescan wallets back to the genesis block in pruned mode (relevant #15946).
>
> **SPV mode** (_needs additional changes_): it would be possible to build the blockfilterindex from the p2p network (rather then deriving them from the blocks) and thus allow some sort of hybrid-SPV mode with moderate bandwidth consumption (related #9483)
ACKs for top commit:
furszy:
diff re-ACK 626b7c8
Tree-SHA512: f84e4dcb851b122b39e9700c58fbc31e899cdcf9b587df9505eaf1f45578cc4253e89ce2a45d1ff21bd213e31ddeedbbcad2c80810f46755b30acc17b07e2873
bf95976061 doc: add note about snapshot chainstate init (James O'Beirne)
e4d7995286 test: add testcases for snapshot initialization (James O'Beirne)
cced4e7336 test: move-only-ish: factor out LoadVerifyActivateChainstate() (James O'Beirne)
51fc9241c0 test: allow on-disk coins and block tree dbs in tests (James O'Beirne)
3c361391b8 test: add reset_chainstate parameter for snapshot unittests (James O'Beirne)
00b357c215 validation: add ResetChainstates() (James O'Beirne)
3a29dfbfb2 move-only: test: make snapshot chainstate setup reusable (James O'Beirne)
8153bd9247 blockmanager: avoid undefined behavior during FlushBlockFile (James O'Beirne)
ad67ff377c validation: remove snapshot datadirs upon validation failure (James O'Beirne)
34d1590331 add utilities for deleting on-disk leveldb data (James O'Beirne)
252abd1e8b init: add utxo snapshot detection (James O'Beirne)
f9f1735f13 validation: rename snapshot chainstate dir (James O'Beirne)
d14bebf100 db: add StoragePath to CDBWrapper/CCoinsViewDB (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11) (parent PR: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15606)
---
Half of the replacement for #24232. The original PR grew larger than expected throughout the review process.
This change adds the ability to initialize a snapshot-based chainstate during init if one is detected on disk. This is of course unused as of now (aside from in unittests) given that we haven't yet enabled actually loading snapshots.
Don't be scared! There are some big move-only commits in here.
Accompanying changes include:
- moving the snapshot coinsdb directory from being called `chainstate_[base blockhash]` to `chainstate_snapshot`, since we only support one snapshot in use at a time. This simplifies some logic, but it necessitates writing that base blockhash out to a file within the coinsdb dir. See [discussion here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24232#discussion_r832762880).
- adding a simple fix in `FlushBlockFile()` that avoids a crash when attemping to flush to disk before `LoadBlockIndexDB()` is called, which happens when calling `MaybeRebalanceCaches()` during multiple chainstate init.
- improving the unittest to allow testing with on-disk chainstates - necessary to test a simulated restart and re-initialization.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK bf95976061
ariard:
Code Review ACK bf9597606
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK bf95976061. Changes since last review: rebasing, switching from CAutoFile to AutoFile, adding comments, switching from BOOST_CHECK to Assert in test util, using chainman.GetMutex() in tests, destroying one ChainstateManager before creating a new one in tests
fjahr:
utACK bf95976061
aureleoules:
ACK bf95976061
Tree-SHA512: 15ae75caf19f8d12a12d2647c52897904d27b265a7af6b4ae7b858592eeadb8f9da6c2394b6baebec90adc28742c053e3eb506119577dae7c1e722ebb3b7bcc0
9e386afb67 tests: Test that PSBT_OUT_TAP_TREE is included correctly (Andrew Chow)
30ff25cf37 psbt: Only include m_tap_tree if it has scripts (Andrew Chow)
0577d423ad psbt: Change m_tap_tree to store just the tuples (Andrew Chow)
22c051ca70 tests: Test that PSBT_OUT_TAP_TREE is combined correctly (Andrew Chow)
7df6e1bb77 psbt: Fix merging of m_tap_tree (Andrew Chow)
0652dc53b2 [BugFix]: Do not allow deserializing PSBT with empty PSBT_OUT_TAP_TREE (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
PSBT_OUT_TAP_TREE should not be included for outputs that do not have such a tree. This should be disallowed during parsing, as well as prior to serialization when the field is populated during updating.
Also added some test cases.
Alternative to #25856
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 9e386afb67
darosior:
ACK 9e386afb67
Tree-SHA512: ce5c02a69752d176dbd967c1e8d30129b1905c8f186aeeef034576c1de82059271a1ee846bd040f5be4e66bb77ba711dcf14ac1e597c5707d7e7e2293f6cfefb
fa08663344 rpc: Return coinbase flag in scantxoutset (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
I guess it can't hurt to return this for someone that wants to know it
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
ACK fa08663344
shaavan:
ACK fa08663344
Tree-SHA512: 04c554b3ed9877bab93ffcf0c1a4430cd41b30c5f4f3bf462a518fc8b3d68832dd85a29e81bd805eaa16e987856933d7a888a8c126f670bb2844bbd5ca1bf902
04526787b5 Validate `port` options (amadeuszpawlik)
f8387c4234 Validate port value in `SplitHostPort` (amadeuszpawlik)
Pull request description:
Validate `port`-options, so that invalid values are rejected early in the startup.
Ports are `uint16_t`s, which effectively limits a port's value to <=65535. As discussed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24116 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24344, port "0" is considered invalid too.
Proposed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21893#issuecomment-835784223
The `SplitHostPort(std::string in, uint16_t& portOut, std::string& hostOut)` now returns a bool that indicates whether the port value was set and within the allowed range. This is an improvement that can be used not only for port validation of options at startup, but also in rpc calls, etc,
ACKs for top commit:
luke-jr:
utACK 04526787b5
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 04526787b5. Just suggested changes since last review: reverting some SplitHostPort changes, adding release notes, avoiding 'GetArgs[0]` problem.
Tree-SHA512: f1ac80bf98520b287a6413ceadb41bc3a93c491955de9b9319ee1298ac0ab982751905762a287e748997ead6198a8bb7a3bc8817ac9e3d2468e11ab4a0f8496d
Check `port` options for invalid values (ports are parsed as uint16, so
in practice values >65535 are invalid; port 0 is undefined and therefore
considered invalid too). This allows for an early rejection of faulty
values and an supplying an informative message to the user.
Splits tests in `feature_proxy.py` to cover both invalid `hostname`
and `port` values.
Adds a release-note as previously valid `-port` and `-rpcport` values
can now result in errors.
faeea28753 test: Avoid race in disconnect_nodes helper (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Also wait for the other node to notice the closed socket. Otherwise, the other node is not able to use the connect helper.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26014
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
ACK faeea2875
glozow:
ACK faeea28753
Tree-SHA512: 2f0fa6812c0519aba3eaf21f0c70073b768fcd4dad23989d57e138ee9057a7da1a6b281645e9bff4051259cdca51568700e066491ac6b6daae99f30e395159ca
e68d380797 rpc: remove unneeded RPCTypeCheckArgument checks (furszy)
55566630c6 rpc: treat univalue type check error as RPC_TYPE_ERROR, not RPC_MISC_ERROR (furszy)
Pull request description:
Same rationale as #26039, tackling another angle of the problem.
#### Context
We have the same univalue type error checking code spread/duplicated few times:
`RPCTypeCheckObj`, `RPCTypeCheckArgument`, `UniValue::checkType`.
In the first two functions, we are properly returning an `RPC_TYPE_ERROR` while in `UniValue::checkType`
we are throwing an `std::runtime_error` which is caught by the RPC server request handler, who invalidly
treats it as `RPC_MISC_ERROR` (which is a generic error return code that provides no information to the user).
#### Proposed Changes
Throw a custom exception from `Univalue::checkType` (instead of a plain
`std::runtime_error`) and catch it on the RPC server request handler.
So we properly return `RPC_TYPE_ERROR` (-3) on every arg type error and
not the general `RPC_MISC_ERROR` (-1).
This will allow us to remove all the `RPCTypeCheckArgument` calls. As them are redundant since #25629.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 4e4c41851fd4e2b01a2d8b94e71513f9831f810768ebd89684caca4901e87d3677980003949bcce441f9ca607a1b38a5894839b6c492f5947b8bab8cd9423ba6
68209a7b5c rpc: make addpeeraddress work with cjdns addresses (Martin Zumsande)
a8a9ed67cc init: Abort if i2p/cjdns are chosen via -onlynet but unreachable (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
If the networks i2p / cjdns are chosen via `-onlynet` but the user forgot to provide `-i2psam` / `-cjdnsreachable`, no outbound connections will be made - it would be nice to inform the user about that.
The solution proposed here mimics existing behavior for `-onlynet=onion` and non-specified `-onion`/`-proxy` where we already abort with an InitError - if reviewers would prefer to just print a warning, please say so.
The second commit adds CJDNS support to the debug-only `addpeeraddress` RPC allowing to add CJDNS addresses to addrman for testing and debug purposes. (if `-cjdnsreachable=1`)
This is the result of an [IRC discussion](https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2022-09-01#848066;) with vasild.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK 68209a7b5c
dergoegge:
ACK 68209a7b5c
Tree-SHA512: 6db9787f01820190f14f90a0b39e4206603421eb7521f792879094d8bbf4d4d0bfd70665eadcc40994ac7941a15ab5a8d65c4779fba5634c0e6fa66eb0972b8d
aee29c5d9e test: wait for the expected basic block filter index in `interface_rest` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Fixes#26098
Wait for the expected 'basic block filter index' to not cause issues when calling `/blockfilterheaders/basic/`, like:
9bd842a592/src/rest.cpp (L423-L424)
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 36abe28a76cd01ce7ac1ae9258ce1a9a5473d985c498d915c1130256bc800d0d1207708a195b78bbcb00478ec9c373a2fbfeb26c1fddeb35abe8b253e0308058
74eb194f81 test: check that bumping tx with already spent coin fails (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing coverage for the `bumpfee` RPC, for the case that a wallet transaction is passed with an input that is already spent:
0b02ce914e/src/wallet/feebumper.cpp (L182-L186)
This is achieved by simply creating a transaction with a wallet and then mining it (I'm not aware of any other scenario how this could be achieved). Additionally, two RPC throw checks are changed in the test to be more specific:
0b02ce914e/src/wallet/feebumper.cpp (L42-L45)0b02ce914e/src/wallet/feebumper.cpp (L47-L50)
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
ACK 74eb194f81
Tree-SHA512: 487d0e30a7cc5e2a5f63424ab6aed2963e05e47e2649fb1ad2289c4b48ad488f2dae5c27bf50e532e7eb2f2f5bf0340ed7dda985d14473f31dec0d757bb56324
b6a65568df Fix issues identified by codespell 2.2.1 and update ignored words (Jon Atack)
8f2010de6e Bump codespell version to 2.2.1 (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
as well as one in `test/lint/lint-locale-dependence.py` not seen by the spelling linter.
Can be tested locally by running `test/lint/lint-spelling.py` on this branch versus on master and by checking the CI linter result.
ACKs for top commit:
satsie:
ACK b6a65568df
Tree-SHA512: ab4ba029a9a5de5926fa5d336bd3b21245acf0649c6aa69a48c223bd22327e13beb32e970f66f54db58cd318731b643e1c7ace9a89776ed2a069cddc02363b71
667401a855 [test] only run feature_rbf.py once (glozow)
Pull request description:
There is no need to run this test twice with --descriptors and --legacy-wallet, as it doesn't use the wallet.
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
ACK 667401a855.
theStack:
ACK 667401a855
brunoerg:
ACK 667401a855
Tree-SHA512: 339213159fac29ebc5678461fae41645aed57877d5525e8ca4755890b869a17ae0bea3f590114769c84b71a7df20c59c9530ab8b327912151c82ec58022f7e71
By throwing a custom exception from `Univalue::checkType` (instead of a plain
std::runtime_error) and catching it on the RPC server request handler.
So we properly return RPC_TYPE_ERROR (-3) on arg type errors and
not the general RPC_MISC_ERROR (-1).
