afc2dd5484 test: various `converttopsbt` check cleanups in rpc_psbt.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
In the functional test rpc_psbt.py, some comments around the `converttopsbt` RPC checks are wrong or outdated and can be removed:
> _Error could be either "TX decode failed" (segwit inputs causes
> parsing to fail) or "Inputs must not have scriptSigs and
> scriptWitnesses"_
Decoding a valid TX with at least one input always succeeds with the [heuristic](e352f5ab6b/src/core_read.cpp (L126)), i.e. this comment is not right and we can assert for the error string "Inputs must not have scriptSigs and scriptWitnesses" on the calls below.
> _We must set iswitness=True because the serialized transaction has
> inputs and is therefore a witness transaction_
This is also unneeded (and confusing, w.r.t. "is therefore a witness transaction"?), for a TX with one input there is no need to set the `iswitness` parameter. For sake of completeness, we still keep one variant where iswitness is explicitly set to true.
Lastly, there is a superflous `converttopsbt` call on the raw tx which is the same as just [about ~10 lines above](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/rpc_psbt.py#L393-L397), so it can be removed.
ACKs for top commit:
ismaelsadeeq:
tested ACK afc2dd5484
achow101:
ACK afc2dd5484
Tree-SHA512: 467efefdb3f61efdb79145044b90fc8dc2f0c425f078117a99112b0074e7d4a32c34e464f665fbf8de70d06caaa5d4ad5908c1d75d2e7607eccb0837480afab3
6e9f8bb050 rpc, tests: in `utxoupdatepsbt` also look for the transaction in the txindex (ishaanam)
a5b4883fb4 rpc: extract psbt updating logic into ProcessPSBT (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
Previously the `utxoupdatepsbt` RPC, added in #13932, only updated the inputs spending segwit outputs with the `witness_utxo`, because the full transaction is needed for legacy inputs. Before this RPC looked for just the utxos in the utxo set and the mempool. This PR makes it so that if the user has txindex enabled, then the full transaction is looked for there for all inputs. If it is not found in the txindex or txindex isn't enabled, then the mempool is checked for the full transaction. If the transaction an input is spending from is still not found at that point, then the utxo set is searched and the inputs spending segwit outputs are updated with just the utxo.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 6e9f8bb050
Xekyo:
ACK 6e9f8bb050
Tree-SHA512: 078db3c37a1ecd5816d80a42e8bd1341e416d661f508fa5fce0f4e1249fefd7b92a0d45f44957781cb69d0953145ef096ecdd4545ada39062be27742402dac6f
In the functional test rpc_psbt.py, some comments around the
`converttopsbt` RPC checks are wrong or outdated and can be
removed:
> Error could be either "TX decode failed" (segwit inputs causes
> parsing to fail) or "Inputs must not have scriptSigs and
> scriptWitnesses"
Decoding a valid TX with at least one input always succeeds with the
heuristic, i.e. this comment is not right and we can assert for the
error string "Inputs must not have scriptSigs and scriptWitnesses"
on the calls below.
> We must set iswitness=True because the serialized transaction has
> inputs and is therefore a witness transaction
This is also unneeded (and confusing, w.r.t. "is therefore a witness
transaction"?), for a TX with one input there is no need to set the
`iswitness` parameter. For sake of completeness, we still keep one
variant where iswitness is explicitly set to true.
Lastly, there is a superflous `converttopsbt` call on the raw tx which
is the same as just about ~10 lines above, so it can be removed.
Previously only the segwit utxos being spent by the psbt were looked for and
added to the psbt. Now, the full transaction corresponding to each of these
utxos (legacy and segwit) is looked for in the txindex and mempool and added
to the psbt. If txindex is disabled and the transaction is not in the mempool,
then we fall back to getting just the utxo (if segwit) from the utxo set.
master branch:
0m36.86s real 0m03.26s user 0m01.69s system
0m35.71s real 0m03.78s user 0m01.64s system
0m45.76s real 0m03.12s user 0m01.27s system
PR branch:
0m13.04s real 0m02.66s user 0m00.93s system
0m14.08s real 0m02.81s user 0m00.82s system
0m14.05s real 0m02.50s user 0m00.93s system
76dc547ee7 gui: create tx, launch error dialog if backend throws runtime_error (furszy)
f4d79477ff wallet: coin selection, add duplicated inputs checks (furszy)
0aa065b14e wallet: return accurate error messages from Coin Selection (furszy)
7e8340ab1a wallet: make SelectCoins flow return util::Result (furszy)
e5e147fe97 wallet: refactor eight consecutive 'AttemptSelection' calls into a loop (furszy)
Pull request description:
Work decoupled from #25806, which cleanup and improves the Coin Selection flow further.
Adding the capability to propagate specific error messages from the Coin Selection process to the user.
Instead of always returning the general "Insufficient funds" message which is not always accurate to what happened internally.
Letting us instruct the user how to proceed under certain circumstances.
The following error messages were added:
1) If the selection result exceeds the maximum transaction weight,
we now will return:
-> "The inputs size exceeds the maximum weight. Please try sending
a smaller amount or manually consolidating your wallet's UTXOs".
2) If the user pre-selected inputs and disallowed the automatic coin
selection process (no other inputs are allowed), we now will
return:
-> "The preselected coins total amount does not cover the transaction
target. Please allow other inputs to be automatically selected or include
more coins manually".
3) The double-counted preset inputs during Coin Selection error will now
throw an "internal bug detected" message instead of crashing the node.
The essence of this work comes from several comments:
1. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26560#discussion_r1037395665
2. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25729#discussion_r940619491
3. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25269#pullrequestreview-1135240825
4. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23144 (which is connected to #24845)
ACKs for top commit:
ishaanam:
crACK 76dc547ee7
achow101:
ACK 76dc547ee7
aureleoules:
ACK 76dc547ee7
theStack:
ACK 76dc547ee7🌇
Tree-SHA512: 9de30792d7a5849cae77747aa978e70390b66ee9d082779a56088a024f82e725b0af050e6603aece0ac8229f6d73bc471ba97b4ab69dc7eddf419f5f56ae89a5
and not the general "Insufficient funds" when the wallet
actually have funds.
Two new error messages:
1) If the selection result exceeds the maximum transaction weight,
we now will return: "The inputs size exceeds the maximum weight".
2) If the user preselected inputs and disallowed the automatic coin
selection process (no other inputs are allowed), we now will
return: "The preselected coins total amount does not cover the
transaction target".
fa10f193b5 test: Set default in add_wallet_options if only one type can be chosen (MacroFake)
555519d082 test: Remove wallet option from non-wallet tests (MacroFake)
fac8d59d31 test: Set -disablewallet when no wallet has been compiled (MacroFake)
fa68937b89 test: Make requires_wallet private (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
The tests have several issues:
* Some tests that are wallet-type specific offer the option to run the test with the incompatible type
For example, `wallet_dump.py` offers `--descriptors` and on current master fails with `JSONRPCException: Invalid public key`. After the changes here, it fails with a clear error: `unrecognized arguments: --descriptors`.
* Tests that don't use the wallet at all offer the option to run it with a wallet type. This is confusing and wastes developers time if they are "tricked" into running the test for both wallet types, even though no wallet code is executed at all.
For example, `feature_addrman.py` will happily accept and run with `--descriptors` or `--legacy-wallet`. After the changes here, it no longer silently ignores the flag, but reports a clear error: `unrecognized arguments`.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa10f193b5
Tree-SHA512: a5784da7305f4ec58c0013f433289000d94fc3d434b00fc329ffa37b812e2cd1da0071e34c3462bf79d904808564f2ae6d3d582f6b86b26215f9b07391b58460
2dede9f675 Adjust RPCTypeCheckObj error string (Leonardo Araujo)
Pull request description:
Unifies the JSON type error strings as mentioned in #26214. Also refer to #25737.
ACKs for top commit:
furszy:
ACK 2dede9f6
Tree-SHA512: c918889e347ba32cb6d0e33c0de5956c2077dd40c996151e16741b0c4983ff098c60258206ded76ad7bbec4876c780c6abb494a97e4f1e05717d28a59b9167a6
Review note: The changes are complete, because self.options.descriptors
is set to None in parse_args (test_framework.py).
A value of None implies -disablewallet, see the previous commit.
So if a call to add_wallet_options is missing, it will lead to a test
failure when the wallet is compiled in.
so if there is an error in any of the pre-set coins, we can fail right away
without computing the wallet available coins set (calling `AvailableCoins`)
which is a slow operation as it goes through the entire wallet's txes map.
----------------------
And to make the Coin Selection flow cleared, have decoupled SelectCoins in two functions:
1) AutomaticCoinSelection.
2) SelectCoins.
1) AutomaticCoinSelection:
Receives a set of coins and selects the best subset of them to
cover the target amount.
2) SelectCoins
In charge of select all the user manually selected coins first ("pre-set inputs"), and
if coin_control 'm_allow_other_inputs=true', call 'AutomaticCoinSelection' to select a
subset of coins owned by the wallet to cover for the target - preset_inputs.total_amount
remaining value.
ab3c06db1a doc: Release notes for default RBF (Andrew Chow)
61d9149e78 rpc: Default rbf enabled (Andrew Chow)
e3c33637ba wallet: Enable -walletrbf by default (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The GUI currently opts in to RBF by default, but RPCs do not, and `-walletrbf` is default disabled. This PR makes the default in those two places to also opt in.
The last time this was proposed (#9527), the primary objections were the novelty at the time, the inability to bump transactions, and the gui not having the option to disable rbf. In the 5 years since, RBF usage has steadily grown, with ~27% of txs opting in. The GUI has the option to enable/disable RBF, and is also defaulted to having it enabled. And we have the ability to bump RBF'd transactions in both the RPC and the GUI. So I think it makes sense to finally change the default to always opt in to RBF.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
reACK ab3c06db1a
aureleoules:
ACK ab3c06db1a.
glozow:
utACK ab3c06db1a
Tree-SHA512: 81b012c5033e270f86a87a6a196ccc549eb54b158eebf88e917cc6621d40d7bdcd1566b602688907dd5d364b95a557b29f97dce869cea512e339588262c027b6
d2ed97656b wallet: Precompute Txdata after setting PSBT inputs' UTXOs (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
If we are given a PSBT that is missing one or more input UTXOs, our
PrecomputedTransactionData will be incorrect and missing information
that it should otherwise have, and therefore we may not produce a
signature when we should. To avoid this problem, we can do the
precomputation after we have set the UTXOs the wallet is able to set for
the PSBT.
Also adds a test for this behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK d2ed97656b
Sjors:
ACK d2ed97656b
aureleoules:
ACK d2ed97656b.
Tree-SHA512: 71beb6c7946096e82cfca83f36277302aa9e69d27b4f6d73d7d8f2f9f0ea1c0d653e846fa6aebee5e4763f56f950b4481240e953f6a2412caa84908d519171e1
If we are given a PSBT that is missing one or more input UTXOs, our
PrecomputedTransactionData will be incorrect and missing information
that it should otherwise have, and therefore we may not produce a
signature when we should. To avoid this problem, we can do the
precomputation after we have set the UTXOs the wallet is able to set for
the PSBT.
Also adds a test for this behavior.
The external input test with specifying input weight would make a
pessimistic estimate of the input weight. However this would result in a
test failure as it is sometimes too pessimistic when an ECDSA signature
ends up being smaller than usual. To correct this, we can calculate the
input weight more accurately.
Added tests to rpc_fundrawtransaction, wallet_send, and rpc_psbt that
test that external inputs can be spent when input weight is provided.
Also tested that the input weight overrides any calculated weight.
Additionally, rpc_psbt's external inputs test is cleaned up a bit to be
more similar to rpc_fundrawtransaction's and avoid potential pitfalls
due to non-deterministic coin selection behavior.
a99ed89865 psbt: sign without finalizing (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
It can be useful to sign an input with `walletprocesspsbt` but not finalize that input if it is complete. This PR adds another option to `walletprocesspsbt` to be able to do that. We will still finalize by default.
This does not materially change the PSBT workflow since `finalizepsbt` needs to be called in order to extract the tx for broadcast.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
utACK a99ed89865
Sjors:
utACK a99ed89
Tree-SHA512: c88e5d3222109c5f4e763b1b9d97ce4655f68f2985a4509caab2d4e7f5bac5047328fd69696e82a330f5c5a333e0312568ae293515689b77a4747ca2f17caca6
The previous diff touched most files in ./test/, so bump the headers to
avoid having to touch them again for a bump later.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./test/
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
11d6459b6e rpc: include_unsafe option for fundrawtransaction (t-bast)
Pull request description:
Allow RPC users to opt-in to unsafe inputs when funding a raw transaction.
Applications that need to manage a complex RBF flow (such as lightning nodes using anchor outputs) are very limited if they can only use safe inputs.
I also added this option to `send` and `walletcreatefundedpsbt` who internally delegate to `fundrawtransaction`.
Fixes#21299
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 11d6459b6e
Tree-SHA512: 5e542a4febcfd6f41cf784678ff02ec9282eae2082c274983f72c5ea87b7ebbe1bd5fdc6a020d7a9d5996157754eb4966b8aeb6c1ceebf0b1519f735579b8bac
Allow RPC users to opt-in to unsafe inputs when funding a raw transaction.
Applications that need to manage a complex RBF flow (such as lightning
nodes using anchor outputs) are very limited if they can only use safe inputs.
Fixes#21299
1) add a new sane "address" field (for outputs that have an
identifiable address, which doesn't include bare multisig)
2) with -deprecatedrpc: leave "reqSigs" and "addresses" intact
(with all weird/wrong behavior they have now)
3) without -deprecatedrpc: drop "reqSigs" and "addresses" entirely,
always.
