in microseconds.
Change the function name in order to print "LockContention" instead
of "PrintLockContention" to the log. Add Doxygen documentation.
With this change, the lock contention log prints:
2021-09-01T11:29:03Z LockContention: pnode->cs_vSend, net.cpp:1373 started
2021-09-01T11:29:03Z LockContention: pnode->cs_vSend, net.cpp:1373 completed (31μs)
2021-09-01T11:29:03Z LockContention: cs_vNodes, net.cpp:2277 started
2021-09-01T11:29:03Z LockContention: cs_vNodes, net.cpp:2277 completed (6μs)
2021-09-01T11:29:04Z LockContention: cs_vNodes, net.cpp:2242 started
2021-09-01T11:29:04Z LockContention: cs_vNodes, net.cpp:2242 completed (3μs)
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: practicalswift <practicalswift@users.noreply.github.com>
After the merge of #18710, the linter is warning:
```bash
A new Boost dependency in the form of "boost/thread/mutex.hpp" appears to have been introduced:
src/sync.cpp:#include <boost/thread/mutex.hpp>
src/test/sync_tests.cpp:#include <boost/thread/mutex.hpp>
^---- failure generated from test/lint/lint-includes.sh
```
the interim #19337 was merged, which introduced more `boost::mutex` usage.
Given we no longer use `boost::mutex`, just remove the double lock test
and remaining includes.
95975dd08d sync: detect double lock from the same thread (Vasil Dimov)
4df6567e4c sync: make EnterCritical() & push_lock() type safe (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Double lock of the same (non-recursive) mutex from the same thread would produce an undefined behavior. Detect this from `DEBUG_LOCKORDER` and react similarly to the deadlock detection.
This came up during discussion in another, related PR: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19238#discussion_r442394521.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK 95975dd08d
hebasto:
re-ACK 95975dd08d
Tree-SHA512: 375c62db7819e348bfaecc3bd82a7907fcd8f5af24f7d637ac82f3f16789da9fc127dbd0e37158a08e0dcbba01a55c6635caf1d8e9e827cf5a3747f7690a498e
Double lock of the same (non-recursive) mutex from the same thread
is producing an undefined behavior. Detect this from DEBUG_LOCKORDER
and react similarly to the deadlock detection.
The functions `EnterCritical()` and `push_lock()` take a pointer to a
mutex, but that pointer used to be of type `void*` because we use a few
different types for mutexes. This `void*` argument was not type safe
because somebody could have send a pointer to anything that is not a
mutex. Furthermore it wouldn't allow to check whether the passed mutex
is recursive or not.
Thus, change the functions to templated ones so that we can implement
stricter checks for non-recursive mutexes. This also simplifies the
callers of `EnterCritical()`.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
# Delete outdated alias for RecursiveMutex
sed -i -e '/CCriticalSection/d' ./src/sync.h
# Replace use of outdated alias with RecursiveMutex
sed -i -e 's/CCriticalSection/RecursiveMutex/g' $(git grep -l CCriticalSection)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
This PR intends to resolve#15227.
"configure --debug-enabled" enables "#ifdef DEBUG_LOCKORDER".
Then "lockdata" (in sync.cpp) will be initialized same as other
static objects.
But unfortunately, lockdata.push_lock() was called before its
initialization (via initializing signatureCache which is declared
in script/sigcache.cpp) on macOS.
This PR apply the "Construct On First Use Idiom" to "lockdata"
to prevent it.
9c4dc597dd Use LOCK macros for non-recursive locks (Russell Yanofsky)
1382913e61 Make LOCK, LOCK2, TRY_LOCK work with CWaitableCriticalSection (Russell Yanofsky)
ba1f095aad MOVEONLY Move AnnotatedMixin declaration (Russell Yanofsky)
41b88e9337 Add unit test for DEBUG_LOCKORDER code (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Make LOCK macros work with non-recursive mutexes, and use wherever possible for better deadlock detection.
Also add unit test for DEBUG_LOCKORDER code.
Tree-SHA512: 64ef209307f28ecd0813a283f15c6406138c6ffe7f6cbbd084161044db60e2c099a7d0d2edcd1c5e7770a115e9b931b486e86c9a777bdc96d2e8a9f4dc192942
Most logs should terminated with a '\n'. Some logs
are built up over multiple calls to logPrintf(), so
do not need a newline terminater. Comment all of
these 'continued' logs as a linter hing.
a5bca13 Bugfix: Include <memory> for std::unique_ptr (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Not sure why all these includes were missing, but it's breaking builds for some users:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652142
(Added to all files with a reference to `std::unique_ptr`)
Tree-SHA512: 8a2c67513ca07b9bb52c34e8a20b15e56f8af2530310d9ee9b0a69694dd05e02e7a3683f14101a2685d457672b56addec591a0bb83900a0eb8e2a43d43200509
