fa097d074b addrman: Log too low compat value (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Before this patch, when writing a negative `lowest_compatible` value, it would be read as a positive value. For example `-32` will be read as `224`. There is generally nothing wrong with that. Though, similarly there shouldn't be anything wrong with refusing to read a negative value. I find the code after this patch more logical than before. Also, this allows dropping a file-wide sanitizer suppression.
In practice none of this should ever happen. Bitcoin Core would never write a negative `lowest_compatible` in normal operation, unless the file storage is later corrupted by external influence.
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
re-ACK fa097d074b
Tree-SHA512: 9aae7b8fe666f52f667f149667025e0160cef1a793cc4d392e36608f65c2bee8096da429235118f40a3368f327aabe30f3732ae78c5874648ea6f423f2687b65
4828d53ecc Add (sorted)multi_a descriptors to doc/descriptors.md (Pieter Wuille)
b5f33ac1f8 Simplify wallet_taproot.py functional test (Pieter Wuille)
eb0667ea96 Add tests for (sorted)multi_a derivation/signing (Pieter Wuille)
c17c6aa08d Add signing support for (sorted)multi_a scripts (Pieter Wuille)
3eed6fca57 Add multi_a descriptor inference (Pieter Wuille)
79728c4a3d Add (sorted)multi_a descriptor and script derivation (Pieter Wuille)
25e95f9ff8 Merge/generalize IsValidMultisigKeyCount/GetMultisigKeyCount (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This adds a new `multi_a(k,key_1,key_2,...,key_n)` (and corresponding `sortedmulti_a`) descriptor for k-of-n policies inside `tr()`. Semantically it is very similar to the existing `multi()` descriptor, but with the following changes:
* The corresponding script is `<key1> OP_CHECKSIG <key2> OP_CHECKSIGADD <key3> OP_CHECKSIGADD ... <key_n> OP_CHECKSIGADD <k> OP_NUMEQUAL`, rather than the traditional `OP_CHECKMULTISIG`-based script, making it usable inside the `tr()` descriptor.
* The keys can optionally be specified in x-only notation.
* Both the number of keys and the threshold can be as high as 999; this is the limit due to the consensus stacksize=1000 limit
I expect that this functionality will later be replaced with a miniscript-based implementation, but I don't think it's necessary to wait for that.
Limitations:
* The wallet code will for not estimate witness size incorrectly for script path spends, which may result in a (dramatic) fee underpayment with large multi_a scripts.
* The multi_a script construction is (slightly) suboptimal for n-of-n (where a `<key1> OP_CHECKSIGVERIFY ... <key_n-1> OP_CHECKSIGVERIFY <key_n> OP_CHECKSIG` would be better). Such a construction is not included here.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 4828d53ecc
gruve-p:
ACK 4828d53ecc
sanket1729:
code review ACK 4828d53ecc
darosior:
Code review ACK 4828d53ecc
Tree-SHA512: 5dcd434b79585f0ff830f7d501d27df5e346f5749f47a3109ec309ebf2cbbad0e1da541eec654026d911ab67fd7cf7793fab0f765628d68d81b96ef2a4d234ce
If `-bind=` is provided then we would bind only to a particular address
and should not add all the other addresses of the machine to the list of
local addresses.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20184 (case 4.)
`GetListenPort()` uses a simple logic: "if `-port=P` is given, then we
must be listening on `P`, otherwise we must be listening on `8333`".
This is however not true if `-bind=` has been provided with `:port` part
or if `-whitebind=` has been provided. Thus, extend `GetListenPort()` to
return the port from `-bind=` or `-whitebind=`, if any.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20184 (cases 1. 2. 3. 5.)
Rename `CaptureMessage()` to `CaptureMessageToFile()` and introduce a
`std::function` variable called `CaptureMessage` whose value can be
changed by unit tests, should they need to inspect message contents.
c4d76c6faa tests: Tests for inactive HD chains (Andrew Chow)
8077862c5e wallet: Refactor TopUp to be able to top up inactive chains too (Andrew Chow)
70134eb34f wallet: Properly set hd chain counters when loading (Andrew Chow)
961b9e4e40 wallet: Parse hdKeypath if key_origin is not available (Andrew Chow)
0652ee73ec Add size check on meta.key_origin.path (Rob Fielding)
Pull request description:
Currently inactive HD chains are only derived from at the time a key in that chain is found to have been used. However, at that time, the wallet may not be able to derive keys (e.g. it is locked). Currently we would just move on and not derive any new keys, however this could result in missing funds.
This PR resolves this problem by adding memory only variables to `CHDChain` which track the highest known index. `TopUp` is modified to always try to top up the inactive HD chains, and this process will use the new variables to determine how much to top up. In this way, after an encrypted wallet is unlocked, the inactive HD chains will be topped up and hopefully funds will not be missed.
Note that because these variables are not persisted to disk (because `CHDChain`s for inactive HD chains are not written to disk), if an encrypted wallet is not unlocked in the same session as a key from an inactive chain is found to be used, then it will not be topped up later unless more keys are found.
Additionally, wallets which do not have upgraded key metadata will not derive any keys from inactive HD chains. This is resolved by using the derivation path string in `CKeyMetadata.hdKeypath` to determine what indexes to derive.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK c4d76c6faa
Tree-SHA512: b2b572ad7f1b1b2847edece09f7583543d63997e18ae32764e5a27ad608dd64b9bdb2d84ea27137894e986a8e82f047a3dba9c8015b74f5f179961911f0c4095
0eea83a85e scripted-diff: rename `proxyType` to `Proxy` (Vasil Dimov)
e53a8505db net: respect -onlynet= when making outbound connections (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Do not make outbound connections to hosts which belong to a network
which is restricted by `-onlynet`.
This applies to hosts that are automatically chosen to connect to and to
anchors.
This does not apply to hosts given to `-connect`, `-addnode`,
`addnode` RPC, dns seeds, `-seednode`.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/13378
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22647
Supersedes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22651
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK 0eea83a85e
prayank23:
reACK 0eea83a85e
jonatack:
ACK 0eea83a85e code review, rebased to master, debug built, and did some manual testing with various config options on signet
Tree-SHA512: 37d68b449dd6d2715843fc84d85f48fa2508be40ea105a7f4a28443b318d0b6bd39e3b2ca2a6186f2913836adf08d91038a8b142928e1282130f39ac81aa741b
c7376cc8d7 tests: Test upgrading wallet with privkeys disabled (Andrew Chow)
3d985d4f43 wallet: Don't generate keys when privkeys disabled when upgrading (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When we're upgrading a wallet, we shouldn't be trying to generate new keys for wallets where private keys are disabled.
Fixes#23610
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK c7376cc8d7
benthecarman:
tACK c7376cc8d7 this fixed the issue for me
Tree-SHA512: fa07cf37df9196ff98671bb1ce5c9aa0bab46495066b4dab796d7e8e5d5c7adb414ff56adae4fd3e15658a610995bd19a9e1edb00c46144b0df635c5b343f3a6
fa7991601c Fixup style of VerifyDB (MarcoFalke)
fa462ea787 Avoid implicit-integer-sign-change in VerifyLoadedChainstate (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This happens when checking all blocks (`-1`).
To test:
```
./configure CC=clang CXX=clang++ --with-sanitizers=undefined,integer
make
UBSAN_OPTIONS="suppressions=$(pwd)/test/sanitizer_suppressions/ubsan:print_stacktrace=1:halt_on_error=1:report_error_type=1" ./test/functional/rpc_blockchain.py
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code-review ACK fa7991601c
brunoerg:
crACK fa7991601c
Tree-SHA512: bcbe6becf2fbedd21bbde83a544122e79465937346802039532143b2e4165784905a8852c0ccb088b964874df5e5550931fdde3629cbcee3ae237f2f63c43a8e
d41ed32153 p2p: Avoid InitError when downgrading peers.dat (junderw)
Pull request description:
fixes#24188 (also see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22762#issuecomment-951063826)
When downgrading, a peers.dat with a future version that has a minimum
required version larger than the downgraded Bitcoin Core version would cause an InitError.
This commit changes this behavior to overwrite the existing peers.dat with
a new empty one.
ACKs for top commit:
prayank23:
reACK d41ed32153
kallewoof:
reACK d41ed32153
Tree-SHA512: c8e625fe36ce0b1aab6c8ef7241c8954038bb856f2de27bdc4814dc9a60e51be28815c7d77d0f96eace49687a0cea02deb713978bbd3a5add742f50a675f2a40
fixes#24188
When downgrading, a peers.dat with a future version that has a minimum
required version larger than the downgraded version would cause an InitError.
This commit changes this behavior to overwrite the existing peers.dat with
a new empty one, while creating a backup in peers.dat.bak.
fad7ddf9e3 test: Run symlink regression tests on Windows (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Seems odd to add tests, but not run them on the platform that needs them most.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fad7ddf9e3
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fad7ddf9e3, just removing new test. Would be nice if the test could be added later, of course.
Tree-SHA512: 64b235967a38c2eb90657e8d7a0447bcc8ce81d1b75a275b6c48bd42efd9ea7e7939257e484f297ee84598def3738eaeb289561aeba1dd6a99b258d389995139
5a89bed410 contrib: address gen-manpages feedback from #24263 (fanquake)
2618fb8d15 Output license info when binaries are passed -version (fanquake)
4c3e3c5746 refactor: shift CopyrightHolders() and LicenseInfo() to clientversion.cpp (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Addresses a review comment from #24263, and addresses the [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24263#issuecomment-1030582925) where it was pointed out that we are inconsistent with emitting our copyright. After this change, the copyright is always emitted with `-version`, rather than `-help`, i.e:
```bash
bitcoind -version
Bitcoin Core version v22.99.0-fc1f355913f6-dirty
Copyright (C) 2009-2022 The Bitcoin Core developers
Please contribute if you find Bitcoin Core useful. Visit
<https://bitcoincore.org/> for further information about the software.
The source code is available from <https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin>.
This is experimental software.
Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying file COPYING
or <https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>
```
The info is also added to binaries other than `bitcoind`/`bitcoin-qt`. This change also prevents duplicate copyright info appearing in the `bitcoind` man page.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Tested ACK 5a89bed410
Tree-SHA512: 0ac2a1adf9e9de0c3206f35837008e3f93eaf15b193736203d71609273f0887cca20b8a90972cb9f941ebd62b330d61a0cbb5fb1b7a7f2dbc715ed8a0c1569d9
48742693ac Replace "can not" with "cannot" in docs, user messages, and tests (Jon Atack)
e670edd434 User-facing content fixups from transifex translator feedback (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Closes#24366.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review re-ACK 48742693ac
hebasto:
re-ACK 48742693ac, only suggested change since my previous [review](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24367#pullrequestreview-885938219).
Tree-SHA512: 4dcdcb417251a413e65fab6070515e13a1267c8e0dbcf521386b842511391f24c84a0c2168fe13458c977682034466509bf2a3453719d4d94d3c568fd9f4adb4
bfcd60f5d5 test: activate all index types in feature_init.py (Martin Zumsande)
0243907fae index: Don't commit without valid m_best_block_index (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
When an index thread receives an interrupt during init before it got to index anything (so `m_best_block_index == nullptr` still), it will still try to commit previous "work" before stopping the thread. That means that `BaseIndex::CommitInternal()` calls `GetLocator(nullptr)`, which returns an locator to the tip ([code](06b6369766/src/chain.cpp (L31-L32))), and saves it to the index DB.
On the next startup, this locator will be read and it will be assumed that we have successfully synced the index to the tip, when in reality we have indexed nothing.
In the case of coinstatsindex, this would lead to a shutdown of bitcoind without any indication what went wrong. For the other indexes, there would be no immediate shutdown, but the index would be corrupt.
This PR fixes this by not committing when `m_best_block_index==nullptr`, and it also adds an error log message to the silent coinstatsindex shutdown path.
This is another small bug found by `feature_init.py` - the second commit enables blockfilterindex and coinstatsindex for this test, enabling coinstatsindex without the first commit would have led to frequent failures.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
reACK bfcd60f5d5
shaavan:
reACK bfcd60f5d5
Tree-SHA512: 8e2bac0fc40cde209518a9e59b597ae0a5a875a2a90898673987c91733718d40e528dada942bf552b58bc021bf46e59da2d0cc5a61045f48f9bae2b1baf6033b
f11dad22a5 test: refactor: remove unneeded bytes<->hex conversions in `byte_to_base58` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
It seems like the only reason for using hex strings in this method was to have a convenient way to convert to an integer from the input data interpreted as big-endian. In Python3 we have `int.from_bytes(..., 'big')` for that purpose, hence there is no need for that anymore and we can simply operate on bytes only.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK f11dad22a5
Tree-SHA512: 9b1563010066ca74d85139c3b9259e9a5bb49e1f141c30b6506a0445afddb2bde7fd421fdd917dc516956e66f93610e2c21d720817640daee8f57f803be76ee4
It seems like the only reason for using hex strings in this
method was to have a convenient way to convert to an integer
from the input data interpreted as big-endian.
In Python3 we have `int.from_bytes(..., 'big')` for that
purpose, hence there is no need for that anymore and we can
simply operate on bytes only.
fa6065661a refactor: Avoid unsigned integer overflow in core_write (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Also, I find the new code a bit easier to understand.
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
Code Review ACK fa6065661a
Tree-SHA512: cd751e3b4dc97ef525eb8be8d0a49e9629389cb114df18d59a06e05388822af2939078e937f01494e6b317d601743b1a433ba47aa40c4dc602372d1f0fd0dc11
b75f4c89ec RPC: Return external_signer in getwalletinfo (Kristaps Kaupe)
Pull request description:
Add `external_signer` to the result object of `getwalletinfo` RPC which indicates whether `WALLET_FLAG_EXTERNAL_SIGNER` flag is set for the wallet.
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
utACK b75f4c89ec
achow101:
ACK b75f4c89ec
prayank23:
utACK b75f4c89ec
brunoerg:
utACK b75f4c89ec
Tree-SHA512: 066ccb97541fd4dc3d9728834645db714a3c8c93ccf29142811af4d79cfb9440a97bbb6c845434a909bc6e1775ef3737fcbb368c1f0582bc63973f6deb17a45f
fac62056b5 Fix integer sanitizer suppressions in validation.cpp (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It doesn't seem ideal to have an integer sanitizer enabled, but then disable it for the whole validation.cpp file.
Fix it with a refactor and remove the suppression.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fac62056b5, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
prayank23:
Code Review ACK fac62056b5
Tree-SHA512: efc5b9887cb2e207033b264ebf425bae5ff013e909701c049aea5d79a21f10495826e962d171b3d412717cbf0a4723e5124133b5401b35a73915212e85e91020
d1fab9d5d2 test: Call ceildiv helper with integer (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
On master,
`assert_fee_amount(Decimal("0.00000993"), 217, Decimal("0.00004531"))` passes
`assert_fee_amount(Decimal("0.00000993"), Decimal("217"), Decimal("0.00004531"))` fails.
the reason is that the // operator in `ceildiv(a,b) = -(-a//b)` has a different behavior for Decimals, see [doc](https://docs.python.org/3/library/decimal.html#decimal-objects).
`wallet_send.py` calls this function with Decimals, and I think this is the reason for the failure reported in the OP of #24151 (`wallet_send.py --legacy-wallet` line 332, the numbers used in the example above are from there). However, the other failures reported there cannot be explained by this, so this is just a partial fix.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK d1fab9d5d2. Tracking down this problem was a good find, and code seems safer and easier to understand now
Tree-SHA512: 5bf0568cd1a0824f6b1a15a03580b6e9391b4f51112a97c1d00469d255bf6dda45c49a36fa567a5ba9b9973efe1d9cdd480db91965c9f4c2aa963629a8a32cba
a036358994 test: Repair failfast option for test runner (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
Fixes#23990
After #23799, the `--failfast` option in the test runner for the functional tests stopped working, because a second outer loop was introduced, which would have needed a `break` too for the test runner to fail immediately. This also led to the errors reported in #23990.
This provides a straightforward fix for that.
There is also #23995 which is a larger refactor, but that hasn't been updated in a while to fix the failfast issue.
ACKs for top commit:
pg156:
Tested ACK a036358994. I agree adding the `all_passed` flag to break out of the outer loop when needed makes sense. The "failfast" option works after this change.
Tree-SHA512: 3e2f775e36c13d180d32a05cd1cfe0883274e8615cdbbd4e069a9899e9b9ea1091066cf085e93f1c5326bd8ecc6ff524e0dad7c638f60dfdb169fefcdb26ee52
fad81548fa test: Avoid testing negative block heights (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
A negative chain height is only used to denote an empty chain, not the height of any block.
So stop testing that and remove a suppression.
ACKs for top commit:
brunoerg:
crACK fad81548fa
Tree-SHA512: 0f9e91617dfb6ceda99831e6cf4b4bf0d951054957c159b1a05a178ab6090798fae7368edefe12800da24585bcdf7299ec3534f4d3bbf5ce6a6eca74dd3bb766
