5f9c0b6360 wallet: Remove -upgradewallet from dummywallet (MarcoFalke)
a314271f08 test: Remove unused wallet.dat (MarcoFalke)
bf7635963c tests: Test specific upgradewallet scenarios and that upgrades work (Andrew Chow)
4b418a9dec test: Add test_framework/bdb.py module for inspecting bdb files (Andrew Chow)
092fc43485 tests: Add a sha256sum_file function to util (Andrew Chow)
0bd995aa19 wallet: upgrade the CHDChain version number when upgrading to split hd (Andrew Chow)
8e32e1c41c wallet: remove nWalletMaxVersion (Andrew Chow)
bd7398cc62 wallet: have ScriptPubKeyMan::Upgrade check against the new version (Andrew Chow)
5f720544f3 wallet: Add GetClosestWalletFeature function (Andrew Chow)
842ae3842d wallet: Add utility method for CanSupportFeature (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR cleans up the wallet upgrade mechanism a bit, fixes some probably bugs, and adds more test cases.
The `nWalletMaxVersion` member variable has been removed as it made `CanSupportFeature` unintuitive and was causing a couple of bugs. The reason this was introduced originally was to allow a wallet upgrade to only occur when the new feature is first used. While this makes sense for the old `-upgradewallet` option, for an RPC, this does not quite make sense. It's more intuitive for an upgrade to occur if possible if the `upgradewallet` RPC is used as that's an explicit request to upgrade a particular wallet to a newer version. `nWalletMaxVersion` was only relevant for upgrades to `FEATURE_WALLETCRYPT` and `FEATURE_COMPRPUBKEY` both of which are incredibly old features. So for such wallets, the behavior of `upgradewallet` will be that the feature is enabled immediately without the wallet needing to be encrypted at that time (note that `FEATURE_WALLETCRYPT` indicates support for encryption, not that the wallet is encrypted) or for a new key to be generated.
`CanSupportFeature` would previously indicate whether we could upgrade to `nWalletMaxVersion` not just whether the current wallet version supported a feature. While this property was being used to determine whether we should upgrade to HD and HD chain split, it was also causing a few bugs. Determining whether we should upgrade to HD or HD chain split is resolved by passing into `ScriptPubKeyMan::Upgrade` the version we are upgrading to and checking against that. By removing `nWalletMaxVersion` we also fix a bug where you could upgrade to HD chain split without the pre-split keypool.
`nWalletMaxVersion` was also the version that was being reported by `getwalletinfo` which meant that the version reported was not always consistent across restarts as it depended on whether `upgradewallet` was used. Additionally to make the wallet versions consistent with actually supported versions, instead of just setting the wallet version to whatever is given to `upgradewallet`, we normalize the version number to the closest supported version number. For example, if given 150000, we would store and report 139900.
Another bug where CHDChain was not being upgraded to the version supporting HD chain split is also fixed by this PR.
Lastly several more tests have been added. Some refactoring to the test was made to make these tests easier. These tests check specific upgrading scenarios, such as from non-HD (version 60000) to HD to pre-split keypool. Although not specifically related to `upgradewallet`, `UpgradeKeyMetadata` is now being tested too.
Part of the new tests is checking that the wallet files are identical before and after failed upgrades. To facilitate this, a utility function `sha256sum_file` has been added. Another part of the tests is to examine the wallet file itself to ensure that the records in the wallet.dat file have been correctly modified. So a new `bdb.py` module has been added to deserialize the BDB db of the wallet.dat file. This format isn't explicitly documented anywhere, but the code and comments in BDB's source code in file `dbinc/db_page.h` describe it. This module just dumps all of the fields into a dict.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
approach ACK 5f9c0b6360
laanwj:
Code review ACK 5f9c0b6360
jonatack:
ACK 5f9c0b6360, approach seems fine, code review, only skimmed the test changes but they look well done, rebased on current master, debug built and verified the `wallet_upgradewallet.py` test runs green both before and after running `test/get_previous_releases.py -b v0.19.1 v0.18.1 v0.17.2 v0.16.3 v0.15.2`
Tree-SHA512: 7c4ebf420850d596a586cb6dd7f2ef39c6477847d12d105fcd362abb07f2a8aa4f7afc5bfd36cbc8b8c72fcdd1de8d2d3f16ad8e8ba736b6f4f31f133fe5feba
5e146022da wallet: fix scanning progress calculation for single block range (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
If the blockchain is rescanned for a single block (i.e. start and stop hashes are equal, and with that also the estimated start/stop verification progress values) the progress calculation could lead to a NaN value caused by a division by zero (0.0/0.0), resulting in an invalid JSON result for the `getwalletinfo` RPC. This PR fixes this behaviour by setting the progress to zero in that special case. Fixes#20297.
The behaviour can easily be reproduced by continuously running single block rescans in an endless loop, e.g. via
```bash
#!/bin/bash
while true
do
bitcoin-cli rescanblockchain $(bitcoin-cli getblockcount)
done
```
and at the same time perform some `getwalletinfo` RPCs.
On the master branch, this leads to frequent invalid responses (tested on mainchain):
```
$ bitcoin-cli getwalletinfo
error: couldn't parse reply from server
$ curl --user `cat ~/.bitcoin/.cookie` --data-binary '{"jsonrpc": "1.0", "id": "curltest", "method": "getwalletinfo", "params": []}' -H 'content-type: text/plain;' http://127.0.0.1:8332/
{"result":{"walletname":"","walletversion":169900,"format":"bdb","balance":0.00000000,"unconfirmed_balance":0.00000000,"immature_balance":0.00000000,"txcount":0,"keypoololdest":1603677276,"keypoolsize":1000,"hdseedid":"3196e33ecb47c7130e6ca60f2f895f9259860dca","keypoolsize_hd_internal":1000,"paytxfee":0.00000000,"private_keys_enabled":true,"avoid_reuse":false,"scanning":{"duration":0,"progress":},"descriptors":false},"error":null,"id":"curltest"}
```
(note that missing value for "progress" in the JSON result).
On the PR branch, the behaviour doesn't occur anymore.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 5e146022da
promag:
Core review ACK 5e146022da.
Tree-SHA512: f0e6aad5a6cd08b36c5fe820fff0ef26663229b39169a4dbe757f3c795a41cf5c69c9dc90efe7515675ae1059307f8971123781a0514d10704123a6f28b125ab
If the blockchain is rescanned for a single block (i.e. start and stop hashes
are equal, and with that also the estimated verification progress) the progress
calculation could lead to a NaN value caused by a division by zero, resulting in
an invalid JSON result for the getwalletinfo RPC. Fixed by setting the progress
to zero in that special case.
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
538be4219a wallet: fix importdescriptor silent fail (Ivan Metlushko)
Pull request description:
Currently `importdescriptor` command will successfully import a descriptor with hardened derivations into a watch-only wallet while silently failing to expand the descriptor to fill the cache. This leads to a broken wallet state and failure to load such wallet due to missing cache on subsequent restart.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 538be4219a
achow101:
ACK 538be4219a
meshcollider:
utACK 538be4219a
Tree-SHA512: 4bdd0ab4437d55b3f1a79c3a300a0b186089155c020fe220a73d0cce274de47d90371d88918d39fd795f9fccf8db328f1e322d29a6062f9ce94a1c254398f004
bd93fc9945 Fix change detection of imported internal descriptors (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Import internal descriptors were having address book entries added which meant they would be detected as non-change. Fix this and add a test for it.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK bd93fc9945
meshcollider:
utACK bd93fc9945
promag:
Code review ACK bd93fc9945.
Tree-SHA512: 8fa9e364be317627ec171eedffdb505976c0e7f1e55bc7e8cfdffa3aeea5db24d231f55166602cd0e97a5ba621acc871de0a765c75d0c65678f83e93c3b657c5
nWalletMaxVersion was used to allow an upgrade to a version only
when the new feature was used. This makes sense for the old
-upgradewallet startup option. But because upgradewallet is now a RPC,
putting off the version bump like this does not make sense. Instead,
immediately upgrading to the given version number makes sense.
Instead of using CanSupportFeature and relying on nWalletMaxVersion,
take the new version we are upgrading to and use IsSupportedFeature
with that and the previous wallet version.
MakeWalletDatabase no longer has a default DatabaseFormat. Instead
callers, like CWallet::Create, need to specify the database type to
create if the file does not exist. If it exists and NONE is given, then
CreateWalletDatabase will try to autodetect the type.
We never need to open database in read-only mode as it's controlled
separately for every batch.
Also we can safely create database if it doesn't exist already
because require_existing option is verified in MakeDatabase
before creating a new WalletDatabase instance.
69cf5d4eeb [test] Make sure send rpc returns fee reason (Sishir Giri)
d5863c0b3e [send] Make send RPCs return fee reason (Sishir Giri)
Pull request description:
Whenever a wallet funds a transaction, the fee reason is reported to the user only if the verbose is set to true. I added an extra parameter to `CreateTransaction` function in wallet.cpp. Then I implemented the fee reason return logic in `SendMoney` in rpcwallet.cpp, followed by verbose parameter in `sendtoaddress` and `sendmany` functions. I also added a fee reason test case in walletbasic.py.
link to the issue: https://github.com/MarcoFalke/bitcoin-core/issues/22#issue-616251578
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 69cf5d4eeb
meshcollider:
utACK 69cf5d4eeb
Tree-SHA512: 2e3af32dcfbd5511ba95f8bc8edca7acfe709a8430ff03e43172e5d0af3dfa4b2f57906978e7f272d878043b9ed8c6004674cf47d7496b005d5f612e9a58aa0e
Using the zmq notifications to avoid excessive mempool polling can be difficult
given the current notifications available. It announces all transactions
being added to mempool or included in blocks, but announces no evictions
and gives no indication if the transaction is in the mempool or a block.
Block notifications for zmq are also substandard, in that it only announces
block tips, while all block transactions are still announced.
This commit adds a unified stream which can be used to closely track mempool:
1) getrawmempool to fill out mempool knowledge
2) if txhash is announced, add or remove from set
based on add/remove flag
3) if blockhash is announced, get block txn list,
remove from those transactions local view of mempool
4) if we drop a sequence number, go to (1)
The mempool sequence number starts at the value 1, and
increments each time a transaction enters the mempool,
or is evicted from the mempool for any reason, including
block inclusion. The mempool sequence number is published
via ZMQ for any transaction-related notification.
These features allow for ZMQ/RPC consumer to track mempool
state in a more exacting way, without unnecesarily polling
getrawmempool. See interface_zmq.py::test_mempool_sync for
example usage.
Although loadwallet() in rpcwallet.cpp assumes LoadWallet() always
assign some value to the 'status', but LoadWallet() does not do so
in some situation.
This fixes above and prevends loadwallet() returns ambiguous error code.
f1ee37319a wallet: Reload previously loaded wallets on GUI startup (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Enable the GUI to also use the load_on_startup feature. Wallets loaded in the GUI always have load_on_startup=true. When they are unloaded from the GUI, load_on_startup=false.
To facilitate this change, UpdateWalletSetting is moved into the wallet module and called from within LoadWallet, RemoveWallet, and Createwallet. This change does not actually touch the GUI code but rather the wallet functions that are shared between the GUI and RPC.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
Tested ACK f1ee37319a - works as expected. Wallets loaded via bitcoin-cli (in `-server` mode) or through the RPC console won't be loaded on startup but wallets loaded via the GUI menu will.
kristapsk:
ACK f1ee37319a, I have tested the code.
Tree-SHA512: f5b44aa763cf761d919015c5fbc0600b72434aa71e3b57007fd7530a29c3da1a9a0c98c4f22cb6cdffba61150a31170056a7d4737625e7b76f6958f3d584da8c
Checks are now consolidated in MakeBerkeleyDatabase function instead of
happening in higher level code.
This commit does not change behavior except for error messages which now
include more complete information.
This removes a source of complexity and indirection that makes it harder to
understand path checking code. Path checks will be simplified in upcoming
commits.
There is no change in behavior in this commit other than a slightly more
descriptive error message in `loadwallet` if the default "" wallet can't be
found. (The error message is improved more in upcoming commit "wallet: Remove
path checking code from loadwallet RPC".)
Enable the GUI to also use the load_on_startup feature.
Wallets loaded in the GUI always have load_on_startup=true.
When they are unloaded from the GUI, load_on_startup=false.
To facilitate this change, UpdateWalletSetting is moved into the wallet
module and called from within LoadWallet, RemoveWallet, and
Createwallet. This change does not actually touch the GUI code but
rather the wallet functions that are shared between the GUI and RPC.
3340dbadd3 Remove -zapwallettxes (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
It's not clear what use there is to keeping `-zapwallettxes` given that it's intended usage has been superseded by `abandontransaction`. So this removes it outright.
Alternative to #19700
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
utACK 3340dbadd3
fanquake:
ACK 3340dbadd3 - remaining manpage references will get cleaned up pre-release.
Tree-SHA512: 3e58e1ef6f4f94894d012b93e88baba3fb9c2ad75b8349403f9ce95b80b50b0b4f443cb623cf76c355930db109f491b3442be3aa02972e841450ce52cf545fc8
-zapwallettxes is made a hidden option to inform users that it is
removed and they should be using abandontransaction to do the stuck
transaction thing.
6d1f51343c [rpc] fundrawtransaction, walletcreatefundedpsbt lock manually selected coins (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
When using `fundrawtransaction` and `walletcreatefundedpsbt` with `lockUnspents`, it would only lock automatically selected coins, not manually selected coins. That doesn't make much sense to me if the goal is to prevent accidentally double-spending yourself before you broadcast a transaction.
Note that when creating a transaction, manually selected coins are automatic "unlocked" (or more accurately: the lock is ignored). Earlier versions of this PR introduced an error when a locked coin is manually selected, but this idea was abandoned after some discussion. An application that uses this RPC should either rely on automatic coin selection (with `lockUnspents`) or handle lock concurrency itself with manual coin selection. In particular it needs to make sure to avoid/pause calls with automatic coin selection between calling `lockunspent` and the subsequent spending RPC.
See #7518 for historical background.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 6d1f51343c
fjahr:
Code review ACK 6d1f51343c
Tree-SHA512: 8773c788d92f2656952e1beac147ba9956b8c5132d474e0880e4c89ff53642928b4cbfcd1cb3d17798b9284f02618a8830c93a9f7a4733e5bded96adff1d5d4d
772ea4844c wallet: Avoid recursive lock in IsTrusted (João Barbosa)
819f10f671 wallet, refactor: Immutable CWalletTx::pwallet (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This change moves `CWalletTx::IsTrusted` to `CWallet` in order to have TSAN. So now `CWallet::IsTrusted` requires `cs_wallet` and the recursive lock no longer happens.
Motivated by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19289/files#r473308226.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
utACK 772ea4844c
hebasto:
ACK 772ea4844c, reviewed and tested on Linux Mint 20 (x86_64).
Tree-SHA512: 702ffd928b2f42a8b90de398790649a5fd04e1ac3877558da928e94cdeb19134883f06c3a73a6826c11c912facf199173375a70200737e164ccaea1bec515b2a
24bf17602c gui refactor: Inline SplashScreen::ConnectWallet (Russell Yanofsky)
e4f4350471 refactor: Move wallet methods out of chain.h and node.h (Russell Yanofsky)
b266b3e0bf refactor: Create interfaces earlier during initialization (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Add WalletClient interface so node interface is cleaner and don't need wallet-specific methods.
The new NodeContext::wallet_client pointer will also be needed to eliminate global wallet variables like ::vpwallets in #19101, because createWallet(), loadWallet(), getWallets(), etc methods called by the GUI need a way to get a reference to the list of open wallets if it is no longer a global variable.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK 24bf17602c.
MarcoFalke:
ACK 24bf17602c🐚
Tree-SHA512: a70d3776cd6723093db8912028c50075ec5fa0a48b961cb1a945f922658f5363754f8380dbb8378ed128c8c858913024f8264740905b8121a35c0d63bfaed7cf
Add WalletClient interface so node interface is cleaner and don't need
wallet-specific methods.
The new NodeContext::wallet_client pointer will also be needed to eliminate
global wallet variables like ::vpwallets, because createWallet(), loadWallet(),
getWallets(), etc methods called by the GUI need a way to get a reference to
the list of open wallets if it is no longer a global variable.
Also tweaks splash screen registration for load wallet events to be delayed
until after wallet client is created.
7f13dfb587 test: test the implicit avoid partial spends functionality (Karl-Johan Alm)
b82067bf69 wallet: try -avoidpartialspends mode and use its result if fees are below threshold (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
The `-avoidpartialspends` feature is normally disabled, as it may affect the optimal fee for payments. This PR introduces a new parameter `-maxapsfee` (max avoid partial spends fee) which acts on the following values:
* -1: disable partial spend avoidance completely (do not even try it)
* 0: only do partial spend avoidance if fees are the same or better as the regular coin selection
* 1..∞: use APS variant if the absolute fee difference is less than or equal to the max APS fee
For values other than -1, the code will now try partial spend avoidance once, and if that gives a value within the accepted range, it will use that.
Example: -maxapsfee=0.00001000 means the wallet will do regular coin select, APS coin select, and then pick AKS iff the absolute fee difference is <= 1000 satoshi.
Edit: updated this to reflect the fact we are now using a max fee.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tested ACK 7f13dfb587
achow101:
ACK 7f13dfb587
jonatack:
ACK 7f13dfb58, code review, debug build, verified the test fails with `AssertionError: not(2 == 1)` for the number of vouts when `-maxapsfee=0.0001` is changed to 0, and verified the new logging with an added assertion.
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 7f13dfb587
Tree-SHA512: 475929df57f6191bb4e36bfbcad5a280a64bb0ecd8767b76cb2e44e2301235d0eb294a3f2fac5bbf15d35d7ecfba47acb2285feadb883c9ce31c08377e3afb3c
9adc2f80fc Refactor OutputGroups to handle effective values, fees, and filtering (Andrew Chow)
7d07e864b8 Use real value when calculating OutputGroup value (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently, the effective values and filtering for positive effective values is done outside of the OutputGroup. We should instead have functions in Outputgroup to do this and call those for each OutputGroup. So this PR does that.
This makes future changes for effective values in coin selection much easier.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK 9adc2f80fc
fjahr:
re-ACK 9adc2f80fc
meshcollider:
Light code review ACK 9adc2f80fc
Tree-SHA512: 7445c94b7295b45bcd83a6f8a5c8f6961a89453fcc856335192d4b4a66aec7724513616b04e5111588ab208c89b311055399d6279cd9c4ce452aefb85f04b64a
e7448d6680 wallet: Don't override signing errors (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
While reviewing #17204 I noticed that the errors in `input_errors` from `::SignTransaction` where being overridden by `CWallet::SignTransaction`. For example, a Script related error led to incomplete signature data which led to `CWallet::SignTransaction` reporting that keys were missing, which was a less precise error than the original one.
Additionally, the error `"Input not found or already spent"` is [duplicated in `sign.cpp`](c7b4968552/src/script/sign.cpp (L481)), so the error here is redundant at the moment. So technically the whole error block could be removed, I think. However, this code is affected by the ongoing work on the wallet so there might be a reason why these errors are here. But even if there is a reason to keep them, I don't think existing, potentially more precise errors should be overridden here unless we want to hide them from the users. I am looking for feedback if this is a work in progress state where these errors could be more useful in the future or if they can be removed.
On testing: even though [the errors in `CWallet` are covered](https://marcofalke.github.io/btc_cov/total.coverage/src/wallet/wallet.cpp.gcov.html), all tests still pass after removing them. I am not sure if there is a desire to cover these specific error messages, tests in `test/functional/rpc_signrawtransaction.py` seem to aim for a more generic approach.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e7448d6680
meshcollider:
Code review ACK e7448d6680
Tree-SHA512: 3e2bc11d05379d2aef87b093a383d1b044787efc70e35955b2f8ecd028b6acef02f386180566af6a1a63193635f5d685466e2f6141c96326c49ffc5c81ca3e23
Instead of having callers set the fees, effective values, and filtering
of outputs, do these within OutputGroups themselves as member functions.
m_fee and m_long_term_fee is added to OutputGroup to track the fees of
the OutputGroup.
