As RetFormat is now exposed in a header, it is renamed to the more
understandable RESTResponseFormat
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
s() { sed -i 's/RetFormat/RESTResponseFormat/g' $1; }
s src/rest.cpp
s src/rest.h
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
4523d28b6b [test] compare filter and header with the result of the getblockfilter RPC (Niklas Gögge)
3a2464f216 [rest] drop superfluous rpc serializations flags for block filters (Niklas Gögge)
064abd14a5 [rest] add a more verbose error message for invalid header counts (Niklas Gögge)
83b8f3a896 [refactor] various style fix-ups (Niklas Gögge)
Pull request description:
This PR addresses unresolved review comments from [#17631](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17631).
This includes:
* various style fix-ups
* returning a more verbose error message for invalid header counts
* removing superfluous rpc serializations flags for block filters
* improving the test to include comparing the block filters returned from the rest with the ones returned from the `getblockfilter` RPC.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK 4523d28b6b
brunoerg:
tACK 4523d28b6b
Tree-SHA512: 634e6b2ae3e1d5f31675a50cfe11a5e74bf5a51b9e7b512d9e18879bf2ed424fc0ac6ec633023f192e3ad12cf0c73b0b51de79dd7ec00844dba3e1493d823b8c
2b64fa3251 Update REST docs with new accessors (Matt Corallo)
ef7c8228fd Expose block filters over REST. (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
This adds a new rest endpoint:
/rest/blockfilter/filtertype/requesttype/blockhash (eg
/rest/blockfilter/basic/header/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f.hex)
which exposes either the filter "header" or the filter data itself.
Most of the code is cribbed from the equivalent RPC.
You can test it at 000000005b.hex
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
ACK 2b64fa3251 - Adding blockfilters to the REST interface is analogous to serving other public data such as transactions or blocks.
Tree-SHA512: d487bc694266375c94d6fcf2e9d788a8a42a3b94e8d3290e46335a64cbcde55084ce5ea6119b79a4065888d94d7c3ae25a59a901fa46e3711f0eb296add12696
5c34507ecb core_write: Rename calculate_fee to have_undo for clarity (fyquah)
8edf6204a8 release-notes: Add release note about getblock verbosity level 3. (fyquah)
459104b2aa rest: Add test for prevout fields in getblock (fyquah)
4330af6f72 rpc: Add test for level 3 verbosity getblock rpc call. (fyquah)
51dbc167e9 rpc: Add level 3 verbosity to getblock RPC call. (fyquah)
3cc95345ca rpc: Replace boolean argument for tx details with enum class. (fyquah)
Pull request description:
Author of #21245 expressed [time issues](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21245#issuecomment-902332088) in the original PR. Given that #21245 has received a lot of review*, I have decided to open this new pull request with [modifications required to get ACK from luke-jr ](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21245#issuecomment-905150806) and a few nits of mine.
### Original PR description
> Display the prevout in transaction inputs when calling getblock level 3 verbosity. This PR affects the existing `/rest/block` API by adding a `prevout` fields to tx inputs. This is mentioned in the change to the release notes.
>
> I added some functional tests that
>
> * checks that the RPC call still works when TxUndo can't be found
>
> * Doesn't display the "value" or "scriptPubKey" of the previous output when at a lower verbosity level
>
>
> This "completes" the issue #18771
### Possible improvements
* b0bf4f255f - I can include even this commit to this PR if deemed useful or I can leave it for a follow-up PR. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21245#issuecomment-894853784 for more context.
### Examples
Examples of the `getblock` output with various verbose levels. Note that `000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5` contains only 2 transactions.
#### Verbose level 0
```bash
./bitcoin-cli -testnet getblock 000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5 0
```
##### Verbose level 1
```bash
./bitcoin-cli -testnet getblock 000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5 1
```
##### Verbose level 2
```bash
./bitcoin-cli -testnet getblock 000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5 2
```
##### Verbose level 3
```bash
./bitcoin-cli -testnet getblock 000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5 3
```
#### REST
```bash
curl -H "content-type:text/plain;" http://127.0.0.1:18332/rest/block/000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5.json
```
<sub>* ... and my everyday obsessive checking of my email inbox whether the PR moves forward.</sub>
Edit laanwj: Removed at symbol from message, and large example output to prevent it from all ending up in the commit message.
ACKs for top commit:
0xB10C:
ACK 5c34507ecb
meshcollider:
utACK 5c34507ecb
theStack:
ACK 5c34507ecb👘
promag:
Concept ACK 5c34507ecb
Tree-SHA512: bbff120d8fd76e617b723b102b0c606e0d8eb27f21c631d5f4cdab0892137c4bc7c65b1df144993405f942c91be47a26e80480102af55bff22621c19f518aea3
This adds a new rest endpoint:
/rest/blockfilter/filtertype/requesttype/blockhash (eg
/rest/blockfilter/basic/header/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f.hex)
which exposes either the filter "header" or the filter data itself.
Most of the code is cribbed from the equivalent RPC.
Display the prevout in transaction inputs when calling getblock level 3
verbosity.
Co-authored-by: Luke Dashjr <luke_github1@dashjr.org>
Co-authored-by: 0xB10C <19157360+0xB10C@users.noreply.github.com>
This is not the cleanest change but:
1. It fixes the erroneous use of RPC's Ensure*() in rest.cpp, which
cause crashes in REST contexts.
RPC code wraps all calls in a try/except, REST code does not.
Ensure*(), being part of RPC, expects that its throw's will get
caught by a try/except. But if you use Ensure*() in REST code, since
it doesn't have a try/except wrap, a crash will happen.
2. It is consistent with other functions like GetMemPool.
Someone can probably make this a bit prettier.
586190f0b4 rpc/rest: Take and reuse local Chain/ChainState obj (Carl Dong)
bc3bd36902 rpc: style: Improve BuriedForkDescPushBack signature (Carl Dong)
f99913969f rpc: Remove unnecessary casting of block height (Carl Dong)
6a3d192020 rpc: Tidy up local references (see commit message) (Carl Dong)
038854f31e rest/rpc: Remove now-unused old Ensure functions (Carl Dong)
6fb65b49f4 scripted-diff: rest/rpc: Use renamed EnsureAny*() (Carl Dong)
1570c7ee98 rpc: Add renamed EnsureAny*() functions (Carl Dong)
306b1cd3ee rpc: Add alt Ensure* functions acepting NodeContext (Carl Dong)
d7824acdb9 rest: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong)
3f08934799 rest: Pass in NodeContext to rest_block (Carl Dong)
7be0671b95 rpc/rawtx: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong)
60dc05afc6 rpc/mining: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong)
d485e815e2 rpc/blockchain: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong)
d0abf0bf42 rpc/*,rest: Add review-only assertion to EnsureChainman (Carl Dong)
cced0f46c9 miner: Pass in previous CBlockIndex to RegenerateCommitments (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Overall PR: #20158 (tree-wide: De-globalize ChainstateManager)
Based on:
- [x] #21270 | [Bundle 4/n] Prune g_chainman usage in validation-adjacent modules
- [x] #21525 | [Bundle 4.5/n] Followup fixups to bundle 4
Note to reviewers:
1. This bundle may _apparently_ introduce usage of `g_chainman` or `::Chain(state|)Active()` globals, but these are resolved later on in the overall PR. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits)
2. There may be seemingly obvious local references to `ChainstateManager` or other validation objects which are not being used in callers of the current function in question, this is done intentionally to **_keep each commit centered around one function/method_** to ease review and to make the overall change systematic. We don't assume anything about our callers. Rest assured that once we are considering that particular caller in later commits, we will use the obvious local references. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits)
3. When changing a function/method that has many callers (e.g. `LookupBlockIndex` with 55 callers), it is sometimes easier (and less error-prone) to use a scripted-diff. When doing so, there will be 3 commits in sequence so that every commit compiles like so:
1. Add `new_function`, make `old_function` a wrapper of `new_function`, divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the local module only**
2. Scripted-diff to divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the rest of the codebase**
3. Remove `old_function`
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 586190f0b4. Since last review, no changes to existing commits, just some simple new commits added: three new commits renaming std::any Ensure functions (scripted diff commit and manual pre/post commits), and one new commit factoring out a repeated `ActiveChain()` call made in a loop. Thanks for the updates!
jnewbery:
utACK 586190f0b4
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 586190f0b4🍯
Tree-SHA512: 64b677fb50141805b55c3f1afe68fcd298f9a071a359bdcd63256d52e334f83e462f31fb3ebee9b630da8f1d912a03a128cfc38179e7aaec29a055744a98478c
In all rest/rpc-related modules, if there are multiple calls to
ActiveChain{,State}(), and the calls fall under the same ::cs_main lock,
we can simply take a local reference and use/reuse it instead of calling
ActiveChain{,State}() again and again.
Organize local variables/references such that:
1. There is always a `ChainstateManager` reference before any `LOCK(cs_main)`.
2. NodeContext references are used with Ensure*() functions introduced in
previous commit where appropriate to avoid duplicate assertions.
fadcd3f78e doc: Remove irrelevant link to GitHub (MarcoFalke)
fa121b628d blockstorage: [refactor] Use chainman reference where possible (MarcoFalke)
fa0c7d9ad2 move-only: Move *Disk functions to blockstorage (MarcoFalke)
fa91b2b2b3 move-only: Move AbortNode to shutdown (MarcoFalke)
fa413f07a1 move-only: Move ThreadImport to blockstorage (MarcoFalke)
faf843c07f refactor: Move load block thread into ChainstateManager (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This picks up the closed pull request #21030 and is the first step toward fixing #21220.
The basic idea is to move all disk access into a separate module with benefits:
* Breaking down the massive files init.cpp and validation.cpp into logical units
* Creating a standalone-module to reduce the mental complexity
* Pave the way to fix validation related circular dependencies
* Pave the way to mock disk access for testing, especially where it is performance critical (like fuzzing)
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK fadcd3f78e, checked (almost) moved only changes. This is a nice tidy up change and doesn't change behavior. Easily reviewed commit by commit.
jamesob:
ACK fadcd3f78e ([`jamesob/ackr/21575.1.MarcoFalke.refactor_create_blocksto`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/21575.1.MarcoFalke.refactor_create_blocksto))
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fadcd3f78e. New organization makes sense, moves extraneous things outside of validation.cpp. PR is also easy to review with helpfully split up moveonly commits.
Tree-SHA512: 917996592b6d8f9998289d8cb2b1b78b23d1fdb3b07216c9caec1380df33baa09dc2c1e706da669d440b497e79c9c62a01ca20dc202df5ad974a75f3ef7a143b
e829c9afbf refactor: replace sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) by std::size (C++17) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
365539c846 refactor: init vectors via std::{begin,end} to avoid pointer arithmetic (Sebastian Falbesoner)
63d4ee1968 refactor: iterate arrays via C++11 range-based for loops if idx is not needed (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This refactoring PR picks up the idea of #19626 and replaces all occurences of `sizeof(x)/sizeof(x[0])` (or `sizeof(x)/sizeof(*x)`, respectively) with the now-available C++17 [`std::size`](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/iterator/size) (as [suggested by sipa](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19626#issuecomment-666487228)), making the macro `ARRAYLEN` obsolete.
As preparation for this, two other changes are done to eliminate `sizeof(x)/sizeof(x[0])` usage:
* all places where arrays are iterated via an index are changed to use C++11 range-based for loops If the index' only purpose is to access the array element (as [suggested by MarcoFalke](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19626#discussion_r463404541)).
* `std::vector` initializations are done via `std::begin` and `std::end` rather than using pointer arithmetic to calculate the end (also [suggested by MarcoFalke](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20429#discussion_r567418821)).
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK e829c9afbf: patch looks correct
fanquake:
ACK e829c9afbf
MarcoFalke:
review ACK e829c9afbf 🌩
Tree-SHA512: b01d32c04b9e04d562b7717cae00a651ec9a718645047a90761be6959e0cc2adbd67494e058fe894641076711bb09c3b47a047d0275c736f0b2218e1ce0d193d
[META] In a previous commit, we moved ::LookupBlockIndex to become a
member function of BlockManager. This commit is split out from
that one since it can be expressed nicely as a scripted-diff.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
find_regex='LookupBlockIndex' \
&& git grep -l -E "$find_regex" -- src \
| grep -v '^src/validation\.\(cpp\|h\)$' \
| xargs sed -i -E "s@${find_regex}@g_chainman.m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex@g"
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
fa6bb0ce5d Assert that RPCArg names are equal to CRPCCommand ones (rawtransaction) (MarcoFalke)
fa80c81487 Assert that RPCArg names are equal to CRPCCommand ones (blockchain) (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is split out from #18531 to just touch some RPC methods. Description from the main pr:
### Motivation
RPCArg names in the rpc help are currently only used for documentation. However, in the future they could be used to teach the server the named arguments. Named arguments are currently registered by the `CRPCCommand`s and duplicate the RPCArg names from the documentation. This redundancy is fragile, and has lead to errors in the past (despite having linters to catch those kind of errors). See section "bugs found" for a list of bugs that have been found as a result of the changes here.
### Changes
The changes here add an assert in the `CRPCCommand` constructor that the RPCArg names are identical to the ones in the `CRPCCommand`.
### Future work
> Here or follow up, makes sense to also assert type of returned UniValue?
Sure, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. I am going to submit any further works as follow-ups, including:
* Removing the CRPCCommand arguments, now that they are asserted to be equal and thus redundant
* Removing all python regex linters on the args, now that RPCMan can be used to generate any output, including the cli.cpp table
* Auto-formatting and sanity checking the RPCExamples with RPCMan
* Checking passed-in json in self-check. Removing redundant checks
* Checking returned json against documentation to avoid regressions or false documentation
* Compile the RPC documentation at compile-time to ensure it doesn't change at runtime and is completely static
### Bugs found
* The assert identified issue #18607
* The changes itself fixed bug #19250
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
utACK fa6bb0ce5d
tryphe:
utACK fa6bb0ce5d. Reducing data duplication is nice. Code changes are minimal and concise.
Tree-SHA512: deb0edc3f999baf055526eaa199b98c500635e12502dece7aa3cad5319db330eb5ee7459a5c8f040a83671a7f20c560c19a2026fb76c8416f138aa332727cbce
b3f7f375ef refactor: Remove g_rpc_node global (Russell Yanofsky)
ccb5059ee8 scripted-diff: Remove g_rpc_node references (Russell Yanofsky)
6fca33b2ed refactor: Pass NodeContext to RPC and REST methods through util::Ref (Russell Yanofsky)
691c817b34 Add util::Ref class as temporary alternative for c++17 std::any (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This PR removes the `g_rpc_node` global, to get same benefits we see removing other globals and make RPC code more testable, modular, and reusable.
This uses a hybrid of the approaches suggested in #17548. Instead of using `std::any`, which isn't available in c++11, or `void*`, which isn't type safe, it uses a small new `util::Ref` helper class, which acts like a simplified `std::any` that only holds references, not values.
Motivation for writing this was to provide an simpler alternative to #18647 by Harris Brakmić (brakmic) which avoids some shortcomings of that PR (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18647#issuecomment-617878826)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK b3f7f375ef, only change is adding back const and more tests 🚾
ajtowns:
ACK b3f7f375ef
Tree-SHA512: 56292268a001bdbe34d641db1180c215351503966ff451e55cc96c9137f1d262225d7d7733de9c9da7ce7d7a4b34213a98c2476266b58c89dbbb0f3cb5aa5d70
f9ee0f37c2 Add comments to CustomUintFormatter (Pieter Wuille)
4eb5643e35 Convert everything except wallet/qt to new serialization (Pieter Wuille)
2b1f85e8c5 Convert blockencodings_tests to new serialization (Pieter Wuille)
73747afbbe Convert merkleblock to new serialization (Pieter Wuille)
d06fedd1bc Add SER_READ and SER_WRITE for read/write-dependent statements (Russell Yanofsky)
6f9a1e5ad0 Extend CustomUintFormatter to support enums (Russell Yanofsky)
769ee5fa00 Merge BigEndian functionality into CustomUintFormatter (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
The next step of changes from #10785.
This:
* Adds support for enum serialization to `CustomUintFormatter`, used in `CAddress` for service flags.
* Merges `BigEndian` into `CustomUintFormatter`, used in `CNetAddr` for port numbers.
* Converts everything (except wallet and gui) to use the new serialization framework.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK f9ee0f37c2, only change is new documentation commit for CustomUintFormatter 📂
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK f9ee0f37c2. Just new commit adding comment since last review
jonatack:
Code review re-ACK f9ee0f37c2 only change since last review is an additional commit adding Doxygen documentation for `CustomUintFormatter`.
Tree-SHA512: e7a0a36afae592d5a4ff8c81ae04d858ac409388e361f2bc197d9a78abca45134218497ab2dfd6d031e0cce0ca586cf857077b7c6ce17fccf67e2d367c1b6cd4
ff6549c3c8 fix: update rest info on block size and json (Chris Abrams)
Pull request description:
Addressing the ambiguous block size text in rest docs: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18703
Also makes sure to let developers know there is `.json` option for the rest output format.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK ff6549c3c8
promag:
ACK ff6549c3c8.
Tree-SHA512: 9ef93c1432d650b1f9599778ba092c1ca5b084a537af257078e1c713c76c5d3a4cc4b1ede8a2489964be8ed0303ad8bea58c1cb4759bbb9b24dbdebfec8001d3
A bad interaction between valgrind and clang 6.0.0-1ubuntu2 with -O2
optimizations makes valgrind misleadingly imply C++ code is reading an
uninitialized blockheight value in rest_blockhash_by_height just because that's
what clang optimized code is doing. The C++ code looks like:
int32_t blockheight;
if (!ParseInt32(height_str, &blockheight) || blockheight < 0) {
while the optimized code looks like:
0x00000000000f97ab <+123>: callq 0x4f8860 <ParseInt32(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, int*)>
0x00000000000f97b0 <+128>: mov 0xc(%rsp),%ebx
0x00000000000f97b4 <+132>: test %ebx,%ebx
0x00000000000f97b6 <+134>: js 0xf98aa <rest_blockhash_by_height(util::Ref const&, HTTPRequest*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&)+378>
0x00000000000f97bc <+140>: xor $0x1,%al
0x00000000000f97be <+142>: jne 0xf98aa <rest_blockhash_by_height(util::Ref const&, HTTPRequest*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&)+378>
During the rest_interface.py test:
self.test_rest_request("/blockhashbyheight/", ret_type=RetType.OBJ, status=400)
when height_str is empty, ParseInt32 returns false and blockheight value is
never assigned. The optimized code reads the uninitialized blockheight value
in 0xc(%rsp) before the checking the ParseInt32 return value in %al, which is
harmless, but triggers the following error from valgrind:
==30660== Thread 13 b-httpworker.2:
==30660== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==30660== at 0x2017B6: rest_blockhash_by_height(util::Ref const&, HTTPRequest*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) (rest.cpp:614)
==30660== by 0x2041B9: operator() (rest.cpp:670)
==30660== by 0x2041B9: std::_Function_handler<bool (HTTPRequest*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&), StartREST(util::Ref const&)::$_1>::_M_invoke(std::_Any_data const&, HTTPRequest*&&, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) (std_function.h:301)
==30660== by 0x3EC994: operator() (std_function.h:706)
==30660== by 0x3EC994: HTTPWorkItem::operator()() (httpserver.cpp:55)
==30660== by 0x3ED16D: WorkQueue<HTTPClosure>::Run() (httpserver.cpp:114)
==30660== by 0x3E9168: HTTPWorkQueueRun(WorkQueue<HTTPClosure>*, int) (httpserver.cpp:342)
==30660== by 0x3EDAAA: __invoke_impl<void, void (*)(WorkQueue<HTTPClosure> *, int), WorkQueue<HTTPClosure> *, int> (invoke.h:60)
==30660== by 0x3EDAAA: __invoke<void (*)(WorkQueue<HTTPClosure> *, int), WorkQueue<HTTPClosure> *, int> (invoke.h:95)
==30660== by 0x3EDAAA: _M_invoke<0, 1, 2> (thread:234)
==30660== by 0x3EDAAA: operator() (thread:243)
==30660== by 0x3EDAAA: std:🧵:_State_impl<std:🧵:_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)(WorkQueue<HTTPClosure>*, int), WorkQueue<HTTPClosure>*, int> > >::_M_run() (thread:186)
==30660== by 0x64256DE: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.25)
==30660== by 0x54876DA: start_thread (pthread_create.c:463)
==30660== by 0x6DC888E: clone (clone.S:95)
==30660== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
==30660== at 0x20173A: rest_blockhash_by_height(util::Ref const&, HTTPRequest*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) (rest.cpp:608)
==30660==
{
<insert_a_suppression_name_here>
Memcheck:Cond
fun:_ZL24rest_blockhash_by_heightRKN4util3RefEP11HTTPRequestRKNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEE
fun:operator()
fun:_ZNSt17_Function_handlerIFbP11HTTPRequestRKNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEEEZ9StartRESTRKN4util3RefEE3$_1E9_M_invokeERKSt9_Any_dataOS1_S9_
fun:operator()
fun:_ZN12HTTPWorkItemclEv
fun:_ZN9WorkQueueI11HTTPClosureE3RunEv
fun:_ZL16HTTPWorkQueueRunP9WorkQueueI11HTTPClosureEi
fun:__invoke_impl<void, void (*)(WorkQueue<HTTPClosure> *, int), WorkQueue<HTTPClosure> *, int>
fun:__invoke<void (*)(WorkQueue<HTTPClosure> *, int), WorkQueue<HTTPClosure> *, int>
fun:_M_invoke<0, 1, 2>
fun:operator()
fun:_ZNSt6thread11_State_implINS_8_InvokerISt5tupleIJPFvP9WorkQueueI11HTTPClosureEiES6_iEEEEE6_M_runEv
obj:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.25
fun:start_thread
fun:clone
}
This is a known bad interaction between clang and valgrind. The clang optimized
code is correct but valgrind has no way of knowing that accessing the
uninitialized value isn't a problem. Issue has been reported previously:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32604#c4https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3/issues/972
This commit just sets blockheight to 0 as a workaround.
Though at the moment ChainActive() simply references `g_chainstate.m_chain`,
doing this change now clears the way for multiple chainstate usage and allows
us to script the diff.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
git grep -l "chainActive" | grep -E '(h|cpp)$' | xargs sed -i '/chainActive =/b; /extern CChain& chainActive/b; s/\(::\)\{0,1\}chainActive/::ChainActive()/g'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
