1afcd41a90 [net] Remove CombinerAll (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This was introduced in 9519a9a4 for use with boost signals. Boost signals
have not been used in net since 8ad663c1, so this code is unused.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 1afcd41a90
laanwj:
code review ACK 1afcd41a90
Tree-SHA512: a4313142afb88bf12f15abc4e717b3b0d0b40d2d5db2638494af3181e1cd680d7b036087050fc0e0dfe606228849a2e20ae85135908a9ebe8ff2130f163920e1
907f142fc7 rpc: change no wallet loaded message to be clearer (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Changes the no wallet is loaded rpc error message to be clearer that no wallet is loaded and how the user can load or create a wallet. Also changes the error code from METHOD_NOT_FOUND to RPC_WALLET_NOT_FOUND as that makes more sense.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 907f142fc7
kristapsk:
ACK 907f142fc7. In addition to standard tests, just in case tested that this doesn't break anything with JoinMarket.
meshcollider:
utACK 907f142fc7
Tree-SHA512: 4b413e6ab5430ec75a79de9db6583f2f3f38ccdf71aa373d8386a56e64f07f92200c8107c8c82c92c7c431d739615977c208b771a24c5960fa8676789b5497a2
fae7a1c188 fuzz: Configure check for main function (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Instead of the PP jungle, use a proper configure check
Fixes https://github.com/google/honggfuzz/issues/336#issuecomment-702972138
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fae7a1c188
Tree-SHA512: 2e55457d01f9ac598bb1e119d8b49dca55a28f88ec164cee6b5f071c29e9791f5a46cc8ee2b801b3a3faf906348da964ce32e7254da981c1104b9210a3508100
Changes the no wallet is loaded rpc error message to be clearer that no
wallet is loaded and how the user can load or create a wallet. Also
changes the error code from METHOD_NOT_FOUND to RPC_WALLET_NOT_FOUND as
that makes more sense.
d103484fe8 util: Do not use gArgs global in ArgsManager member functions (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK d103484fe8: patch looks correct
Tree-SHA512: dda7a5062363170c6995f2fd8fda48c0a919e5ca67be9faa8f0fa66f9d3b535f134eb6f4860a0859bc5457c02230b34a8d1264045f22bed8d30668158ac2271f
b048b275d9 [validation] Remove absurdfee from accepttomempool (John Newbery)
932564b9cf scripted-diff: update max-fee-exceeded error message to include RPC (gzhao408)
8f1290c601 [rpc/node] check for high fee before ATMP in clients (gzhao408)
Pull request description:
Picked up from #15810. Add separate fee-checking logic for clients that need to enforce max fee rates, then remove the `absurdFee` logic from ATMP.
ATMP's `nAbsurdFee` argument is used to enforce user-specific behavior (it is not policy since it isn't applied consistently: it is only ever used in RPC and wallet, and set to 0 everywhere else internally). It should be removed from `AcceptToMemoryPool` because (1) validation results/mempool behavior should not be user-specific and (2) enforcing a max fee rate should be the responsibility of the client instead of the mempool.
Note: this PR does not intend to _remove_ protection from high fees, just re-delegate the responsibility to clients.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK b048b275d9
LarryRuane:
re-ACK b048b275d9
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK b048b275d9 , only change is squashing one commit 🏦
instagibbs:
utACK b048b275d9
Tree-SHA512: 57c17ba16d230a4cae2896dd6a64c924f307757824e35784bf96da7b10aff2d8ea910710edf35e981035623a155f8766209a92a0fdb856549fde78bc3eaae4d2
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/Fee exceeds maximum configured by \-\maxtxfee/Fee exceeds maximum configured by user (e.g. -maxtxfee, maxfeerate)/g' src/util/error.cpp test/functional/rpc_fundrawtransaction.py test/functional/rpc_psbt.py test/functional/rpc_rawtransaction.py test/functional/wallet_bumpfee.py test/functional/wallet_create_tx.py
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Check absurd fee in BroadcastTransaction and RPC,
return TransactionError::MAX_FEE_EXCEEDED instead
of TxValidationResult::TX_NOT_STANDARD because this
is client preference, not a node-wide policy.
1885ad3546 RPC: remove duplicate line in getblock help (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Line simply seems duplicated in error.
Testing instructions:
Run `src/bitcoin-cli help getblock` on master branch to reproduce. Then build this PR and compare its results.
ACKs for top commit:
dhruv:
tACK `1885ad3`
kristapsk:
ACK 1885ad3546
Emzy:
tACK 1885ad3546
Tree-SHA512: 870c035cb553b0e1d5ef72e64231ef277e0392efe94bc6ecf47129023bd94a6d5a276f46529807f68a1db55c7baa94d9119c7264d9947bc4e5dd9dcefd1b13e7
675e55e013 Ignore unknown messages before VERACK (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
This allows for feature negotiation to take place with messages between VERSION and VERACK in the future, without requiring additional software changes to specifically ignore messages for features that are unimplemented by our software.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 675e55e013
practicalswift:
ACK 675e55e013: patch looks correct
MarcoFalke:
ACK 675e55e013
hebasto:
ACK 675e55e013, the offender peer will be eventually disconnected due to the timeout.
Tree-SHA512: 8d2b1d8b9843f2ee26b2c30f7c5ff0bfcfbe3f46b32cd0369c48ece26624151091237e83ce3f18c6da004099026602cfab1642ac916db777f047d170b365c007
f471a3be00 scripted diff: Improve invalid vout value rpc error message (Nima Yazdanmehr)
Pull request description:
Since the `vout` value can start at `0`, the error message for *negative* values can be improved to something like: `vout cannot be negative`.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK f471a3be00
promag:
Code review ACK f471a3be00.
Tree-SHA512: fbdee3d0ddd5b58eb93934a1217b44e125a9ad39e672b1f35c7609c6c5fcf45ae1b731d3d6135b7225d98792dbfc34a50907b8c41274a5b029d7b5c59f886560
d76925478e [doc] Clarify semantic of peer's m_protect w.r.t to outbound eviction logics (Antoine Riard)
ac71fe936d [doc] Clarify scope of eviction protection of outbound block-relay peers (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
Block-relay-only peers were introduced by #15759. According to its
author, it was intented to make them only immune to outbound peer
rotation-based eviction and not from all eviction as modified comment
leans to think of.
Clearly indicate that outbound block-relay peers aren't protected
from eviction by the bad/lagging chain logic.
Fix#19863
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK d76925478e
jonatack:
ACK d76925478e
Tree-SHA512: 597fbd62838a6e39276024165b11514cad20a2e9d33cf9202d261cbadcb62b2df427c858e0cb57e585840d4c1d4600104aa53916bb868541f2580e4eed9b4b52
96571b3d4c doc: Update onion service target port numbers in tor.md (Hennadii Stepanov)
bb145c9050 net: Extend -bind config option with optional network type (Hennadii Stepanov)
92bd3c1da4 net, refactor: Move AddLocal call one level up (Hennadii Stepanov)
57f17e57c8 net: Pass onion service target to Tor controller (Hennadii Stepanov)
e3f07851f0 refactor: Rename TorController::target to m_tor_control_center (Hennadii Stepanov)
fdd3ae4d26 net, refactor: Refactor CBaseChainParams::RPCPort function (Hennadii Stepanov)
a5266d4546 net: Add alternative port for onion service (Hennadii Stepanov)
b3273cf403 net: Use network byte order for in_addr.s_addr (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR adds ability to label incoming Tor connections as different from normal localhost connections.
Closes#8973.
Closes#16693.
Default onion service target ports are:
- 8334 on mainnnet
- 18334 on testnet
- 38334 on signet
- 18445 on regtest
To set the onion service target socket manually the extended `-bind` config option could be used:
```
$ src/bitcoind -help | grep -A 6 -e '-bind'
-bind=<addr>[:<port>][=onion]
Bind to given address and always listen on it (default: 0.0.0.0). Use
[host]:port notation for IPv6. Append =onion to tag any incoming
connections to that address and port as incoming Tor connections
(default: 127.0.0.1:8334=onion, testnet: 127.0.0.1:18334=onion,
signet: 127.0.0.1:38334=onion, regtest: 127.0.0.1:18445=onion)
```
Since [pr19991.02 update](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19991#issuecomment-698882284) this PR is an alternative to #19043.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 96571b3d4c
vasild:
ACK 96571b3d4
laanwj:
Re-ACK 96571b3d4c
Tree-SHA512: cb0eade80f4b3395f405f775e1b89c086a1f09d5a4464df6cb4faf808d9c2245474e1720b2b538f203f6c1996507f69b09f5a6e35ea42633c10e22bd733d4438
7eab781a14 rpc: Set HTTP Content-Type in bitcoin-cli (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
We don't set any `Content-Type` in the client. It is more consistent with our other JSON-RPC use to set it to `application/json`.
Note that our server doesn't enforce content types, so it doesn't make a difference in practice. But it is fairly strange HTTP behavior to not set it at all for a POST request.
This came up in #18950.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK 7eab781a14.
jonatack:
Tested ACK 7eab781a14
practicalswift:
ACK 7eab781a14: patch looks correct
fanquake:
ACK 7eab781a14 - Looks fine to me.
Tree-SHA512: a9fa155324d0f7bff955585a336ead6bb60b721039f424521a435e4bb0fad3f4532e5cc7b7a9acc4e93585e8d3db3082c010138810f22c0e92b8f749b86ef653
e66870c5a4 zmq: Append address to notify log output (nthumann)
241803da21 test: Add zmq test to support multiple interfaces (nthumann)
a0b2e5cb6a doc: Add release notes to support multiple interfaces (nthumann)
b1c3f180ec doc: Adjust ZMQ usage to support multiple interfaces (nthumann)
347c94f551 zmq: Add support to listen on multiple interfaces (Nicolas Thumann)
Pull request description:
This PR adds support for ZeroMQ to listen on multiple interfaces, just like the RPC server.
Currently, if you specify more than one e.g. `zmqpubhashblock` paramter, only the first one will be used. Therefore a user may be forced to listen on all interfaces (e.g. `zmqpubhashblock=0.0.0.0:28332`), which can result in an increased attack surface.
With this PR a user can specify multiple interfaces to listen on, e.g.
`-zmqpubhashblock=tcp://127.0.0.1:28332 -zmqpubhashblock=tcp://192.168.1.123:28332`.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK e66870c5a4
instagibbs:
reACK e66870c5a4
Tree-SHA512: f38ab4a6ff00dc821e5f4842508cefadb701e70bb3893992c1b32049be20247c8aa9476a1f886050c5f17fe7f2ce99ee30193ce2c81a7482a5a51f8fc22300c7
We don't set any `Content-Type` in the client. It is more
consistent with our other JSON-RPC use to set it to `application/json`.
Note that our server doesn't enforce content types, so it doesn't make a
difference in practice. But it is fairly strange HTTP behavior to not set it.
This came up in #18950.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
r() { sed -i 's/vout must be positive/vout cannot be negative/g' $1 }
r $(git grep -l 'vout must be positive')
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
fa710a6d67 doc: Add 19501 release notes (MarcoFalke)
faf60dee34 doc: Remove double-whitespace from help string, other whitespace fixups (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Adds release notes and fixes up some whitespace nits for the touched RPCs
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa710a6d67
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa710a6d67
Tree-SHA512: b84a96386a9a8ed69f464c7dffdd600cf9a8b33a06120798b141b300991baed369ab91ae48df6446e89e1d62534ccd8ae721454e7a19b48900b317e9192afc47
af57766182 Fix misleading error message: Clean stack rule (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
Error messages in clean stack is misleading as it lets the user believe that there are extra
elements on the stack which is incorrect if the stack is empty.
Let me know if this requires additional test.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
re-ACK af57766182
gzhao408:
reACK af57766182
theStack:
re-ACK af57766182
darosior:
re ACK af57766182
Tree-SHA512: 88e77416e220b080246fec368f5552a891d102d072b7bee62ac560d5e31c4a8c2ee9cbe569740b253e9df177d21dc788d10d856b2a542ab47761bb81698e4082
fac966142e signet: Add assumed values for default signet (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Doesn't matter much right now, but when the default signet is bigger, this might come in handy
ACKs for top commit:
jsarenik:
Tested ACK fac966142e
laanwj:
Tested ACK fac966142e (did a new re-sync)
kallewoof:
utACK fac966142e
Tree-SHA512: ed2692f5896350f8dc81f9bc5d79fbf1a4544b8f724c5c667fcadec3a37e26e9833ac189a3067a0731fd7b17a0c94f6b44a641fffe448e42259f7b7b44910db1
69cf5d4eeb [test] Make sure send rpc returns fee reason (Sishir Giri)
d5863c0b3e [send] Make send RPCs return fee reason (Sishir Giri)
Pull request description:
Whenever a wallet funds a transaction, the fee reason is reported to the user only if the verbose is set to true. I added an extra parameter to `CreateTransaction` function in wallet.cpp. Then I implemented the fee reason return logic in `SendMoney` in rpcwallet.cpp, followed by verbose parameter in `sendtoaddress` and `sendmany` functions. I also added a fee reason test case in walletbasic.py.
link to the issue: https://github.com/MarcoFalke/bitcoin-core/issues/22#issue-616251578
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 69cf5d4eeb
meshcollider:
utACK 69cf5d4eeb
Tree-SHA512: 2e3af32dcfbd5511ba95f8bc8edca7acfe709a8430ff03e43172e5d0af3dfa4b2f57906978e7f272d878043b9ed8c6004674cf47d7496b005d5f612e9a58aa0e
2ea62cae48 Improve docs about feeler connections (Gleb Naumenko)
Pull request description:
"feeler" and "test-before-evict" are two different strategies suggest in [Eclipse Attacks on Bitcoin’s Peer-to-Peer Network](https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity15/sec15-paper-heilman.pdf). In our codebase, we use `ConnType::FEELER` to implement both.
It is confusing, up to the point that our documentation was just incorrect.
This PR:
- ~clarifies this aspect by renaming "ConnType::FEELER" to "ConnType::PROBE", meaning that this connections only probes that the node is operational, and then disconnects.~
- fixes the documentation
ACKs for top commit:
amitiuttarwar:
ACK 2ea62cae48. thank you!
practicalswift:
ACK 2ea62cae48
Tree-SHA512: c9c03c09eefeacec28ea199cc3f697b0a98723f2f849f7a8115edc43791f8165e296e0e25a82f0b5a4a781a7de38c8954b48bf74c714eba02cdc21f7460673e5
f22d6a1142 log: Remove static log message "Initializing chainstate Chainstate [ibd] @ height -1 (null)" (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Remove static log message `Initializing chainstate Chainstate [ibd] @ height -1 (null)`.
AFAICT `chainstate->ToString()` will always equal `"Chainstate [ibd] @ height -1 (null)"` here which makes the log message neither relevant nor interesting :)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK f22d6a1142
promag:
ACK f22d6a1142, just get rid of it.
hebasto:
ACK f22d6a1142, I agree that the removed log message in its current state is cryptic and useless.
Tree-SHA512: 1a65c0d14c9a433afcdaadef9bfcdd5d63276d5d2caee1bf3c48ac477e54fa28138f64020e6e26ca5e67872954a1e7d93fa24a12accc7c7211bc6e7a6039051d
9b4fa0af40 net: Print error message if -proxy is specified without arguments (instead of continuing without proxy server) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Exit with error message if `-proxy` is specified without arguments (instead of continuing without proxy server).
Continuing without a proxy server when the end-user has specified `-proxy` may result in accidental loss of privacy. (The end-user might think he/she is using a proxy when he/she is not.)
Before this patch:
```
$ src/bitcoind -proxy
…
2020-09-23T00:24:33Z InitParameterInteraction: parameter interaction: -proxy set -> setting -listen=0
2020-09-23T00:24:33Z InitParameterInteraction: parameter interaction: -proxy set -> setting -upnp=0
2020-09-23T00:24:33Z InitParameterInteraction: parameter interaction: -proxy set -> setting -discover=0
2020-09-23T00:24:33Z InitParameterInteraction: parameter interaction: -listen=0 -> setting -listenonion=0
…
2020-09-23T00:24:33Z init message: Starting network threads...
```
`bitcoind` is now running *without* a proxy server (`GetProxy(…, …) == false`, `HaveNameProxy() == false`, etc.).
Note that the "-proxy set" log messages above which the end-user might interpret as "good, my traffic is now routed via the proxy".
After this patch:
```
$ src/bitcoind -proxy
Error: No proxy server specified. Use -proxy=<ip> or -proxy=<ip:port>.
$ echo $?
1
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
re-ACK 9b4fa0af40
kristapsk:
ACK 9b4fa0af40, I have tested the code.
hebasto:
re-ACK 9b4fa0af40
Tree-SHA512: 4ba7a011991699a54b5bb87ec68367c681231bf5dcd36f8c89ff9ddc2e8d29df453817b7e362597e652ad6b341a22b7274be0fd78d435e5f0fd8058e5221c4ce
62dba9628d log: print unexpected version warning in validation log category (nthumann)
Pull request description:
Fixes#19603: As suggested by practicalswift, instead of always printing `<n> of the last 100 blocks have unexpected version` as a warning appended to UpdateTip, it is now printed in the validation log category and therefore only visible with `-debug=validation` enabled.
Before:
`2020-09-06T15:56:00Z UpdateTip: new best=00000000000000000001b2872e107a98b57913120e5c6c87ce2715a34c40adf8 height=646969 version=0x20400000 log2_work=92.261571 tx=565651941 date='2020-09-06T10:35:36Z' progress=0.999888 cache=32.2MiB(237417txo) warning='72 of last 100 blocks have unexpected version'`
After:
`2020-09-06T16:31:26Z UpdateTip: new best=0000000000000000000b3bd786dc42745dd7be4a8c695500a04518cb9e2f4dc1 height=646971 version=0x20000000 log2_work=92.261607 tx=565655901 date='2020-09-06T10:57:19Z' progress=0.999883 cache=3.8MiB(27550txo)`
`2020-09-06T16:31:26Z 71 of last 100 blocks have unexpected version`
Ran unit & functional tests, confirmed that the warning is now only printed when validation category is enabled.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK 62dba9628d
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 62dba96
practicalswift:
ACK 62dba9628d -- only change since last ACK is `s/nUpgraded/num_unexpected_version/`
hebasto:
re-ACK 62dba9628d, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19898#pullrequestreview-483158708 is resolved now.
Tree-SHA512: 2100ca7d6d3fd67c92e81d75162d2506d6f1ecf1761d5180d76663fac06771b35e5c4235ebe1a00731b5f7db82db3cd19328627929c8f22912df592686ba51d3
a3abeec33a policy/fees: remove a floating-point division by zero (Antoine Poinsot)
c36869bbf6 policy/fees: unify some duplicated for loops (Antoine Poinsot)
569d92a4d2 policy/fees: small readability improvements (Antoine Poinsot)
5b8cb35621 policy/fee: remove requireGreater parameter in EstimateMedianVal() (Antoine Poinsot)
dba8196b44 policy/fees: correct decay explanation comments (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
This (*does not* change behaviour and) cleans up a bit of unused code in `CBlockPolicyEstimator` and friends, and slightly improves readability of the rest (comment correction etc.). The last commit is a small reformatting one which I could not resist but am happy to remove at will.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK a3abeec33a
MarcoFalke:
ACK a3abeec33a💹
ariard:
Code Review ACK a3abeec.
Tree-SHA512: b7620bcd23a2ffa8f7ed859467868fc0f6488279e3ee634f6d408872cb866ad086a037e8ace76599a05b7e9c07768adf5016b0ae782d153196b9c030db4c34a5
