Transactions are intended to be started on upper layers rather than
internally by the bdb batch object. This enables us to consolidate
different write operations within a procedure in the same db txn,
improving consistency due to the atomic property of the transaction,
as well as its performance due to the reduction of disk write
operations.
Important Note:
This approach also ensures that the BerkeleyBatch::ErasePrefix
function behaves exactly as the SQLiteBatch::ErasePrefix function,
which does not create a db txn internally.
Furthermore, since the `BerkeleyBatch::ErasePrefix' implementation
erases records one by one (by traversing the db), this change
ensures that the function is always called within an active txn
context. Without this measure, there's a potential risk to consistency;
certain records may be removed while others could persist due to an
internal failure during the procedure.
'RunWithinTxn()' provides a way to execute db operations within a
transactional context. It avoids writing repetitive boilerplate code for
starting and committing the database transaction.
9a3c5c8697 scripted-diff: rename ZapSelectTx to RemoveTxs (furszy)
83b762845f wallet: batch and simplify ZapSelectTx process (furszy)
595d50a103 wallet: migration, remove extra NotifyTransactionChanged call (furszy)
a2b071f992 wallet: ZapSelectTx, remove db rewrite code (furszy)
Pull request description:
Work decoupled from #28574. Brother of #28894.
Includes two different, yet interconnected, performance and code improvements to the zap wallet transactions process.
1) As the goal of the `ZapSelectTx` function is to erase tx records that match any of the inputted hashes. There is no need to traverse the whole database record by record. We could just check if the tx exist, and remove it directly by calling `EraseTx()`.
2) Instead of performing single write operations per removed tx record, this PR batches them all within a single atomic db txn.
Moreover, these changes will enable us to consolidate all individual write operations that take place during the wallet migration process into a single db txn in the future.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 9a3c5c8697
josibake:
ACK 9a3c5c8697
Tree-SHA512: fb2ecc48224c400ab3b1fbb32e174b5b13bf03794717727f80f01f55fb183883b067a68c0a127b2de8885564da15425d021a96541953bf38a72becc2e9929ccf
517c7f9cba gui: Check for private keys disabled before attempting unlock (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Before trying to unlock a wallet, first check if it has private keys disabled. If so, there is no need to unlock.
Note that such wallets are not expected to occur in typical usage. However bugs in previous versions allowed such wallets to be created, and so we need to handle them.
Fixes#772
For some additional context, see #631
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 517c7f9cba, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
BrandonOdiwuor:
ACK 517c7f9cba
Tree-SHA512: c92aa34344d04667b70b059d2aa0a1da999cb7239cd1413f3009781aa82379f309ff9808d7dc91d385e2c8afe2abda3564568e2091ef833b1536ebfcf80f7c3c
bee0ffbecf GUI/Intro: Never change the prune checkbox after the user has touched it (Luke Dashjr)
420a983e25 Bugfix: GUI/Intro: Disable GUI prune option if -prune is set, regardless of set value (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Re-PR from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18729
Now includes a bugfix too (`-prune=2+` disabled the checkbox, but `-prune=0/1` did not; this behaviour is necessary since `-prune` overrides GUI settings)
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK bee0ffbecf, both commits are improvements of the current behaviour. Tested on Ubuntu 23.10.
Tree-SHA512: 8eb7d90af37deb30fe226179db3bc9df8ab59e4f3218c8e447ed31fc9ddc81ac1a1629da63347518587a56a4c8558b05cf7ec474024c5f5dfc6d49d6ff0eb0cc
b2e531e70a qt: update widgets availability on wallet selection (pablomartin4btc)
Pull request description:
This PR addresses an issue where, with no wallet selected, ticking on "Settings -> Mask values" checkbox twice enables the transaction tab when the checkbox is unticked.
<details>
<summary>Current behavior display on master</summary>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Correction display from this branch</summary>
</details>
Note for maintaners: this PR should be backported to both 25.x and 26.x.
---
Originally this PR was disabling the "Mask Values" checkbox when no wallet was selected but since a reviewer pointed out that a user might want to open a wallet already on "privacy mode" I rolled that change out.
<details>
<summary>Original correction display disabling "Mask Values" </summary>
</details>
ACKs for top commit:
alfonsoromanz:
Tested ACK b2e531e70a
hebasto:
ACK b2e531e70a, tested on Ubuntu 22.04.
Tree-SHA512: 6be77ab4d5ec86267a9b0a289a4d8600bb67d279f7e0be65e47b608ec392fe705cf026e32f3c082d2f27449b697d1d9e6a1d110035900d7a804ba823c9f5dfd4
ede5014c44 Modify command line help to show support for BIP21 URIs (Hernan Marino)
Pull request description:
While reviewing a different PR (see https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/742 ) **hebasto** suggested that the help for bitcoin-qt should be updated to reflect the fact that bitcoin-qt supports an optional BIP21 URI parameter.
Since this reflects actual behaviour of bitcoin-qt and is independent of whether or not the other PR gets merged, I created this simple PR to fix the help message.
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
utACK ede5014c44
pablomartin4btc:
lgtm, re ACK ede5014c44
hebasto:
ACK ede5014c44.
Tree-SHA512: c456297c486bc5cc65e0e092e7ba9d51b0bd7a584d4fabca7f7ca1f8e58cbcc66e96226539c689ed0f5e7f40da220bbc4ea30b90e31e1aeeb8867a385a90209c
29029df5c7 [doc] v3 signaling in mempool-replacements.md (glozow)
e643ea795e [fuzz] v3 transactions and sigop-adjusted vsize (glozow)
1fd16b5c62 [functional test] v3 transaction submission (glozow)
27c8786ba9 test framework: Add and use option for tx-version in MiniWallet methods (MarcoFalke)
9a1fea55b2 [policy/validation] allow v3 transactions with certain restrictions (glozow)
eb8d5a2e7d [policy] add v3 policy rules (glozow)
9a29d470fb [rpc] return full string for package_msg and package-error (glozow)
158623b8e0 [refactor] change Workspace::m_conflicts and adjacent funcs/structs to use Txid (glozow)
Pull request description:
See #27463 for overall package relay tracking.
Delving Bitcoin discussion thread: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/v3-transaction-policy-for-anti-pinning/340
Delving Bitcoin discussion for LN usage: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/lightning-transactions-with-v3-and-ephemeral-anchors/418
Rationale:
- There are various pinning problems with RBF and our general ancestor/descendant limits. These policies help mitigate many pinning attacks and make package RBF feasible (see #28984 which implements package RBF on top of this). I would focus the most here on Rule 3 pinning. [1][2]
- Switching to a cluster-based mempool (see #27677 and #28676) requires the removal of CPFP carve out, which applications depend on. V3 + package RBF + ephemeral anchors + 1-parent-1-child package relay provides an intermediate solution.
V3 policy is for "Priority Transactions." [3][4] It allows users to opt in to more restrictive topological limits for shared transactions, in exchange for the more robust fee-bumping abilities that offers. Even though we don't have cluster limits, we are able to treat these transactions as having as having a maximum cluster size of 2.
Immediate benefits:
- You can presign a transaction with 0 fees (not just 1sat/vB!) and add a fee-bump later.
- Rule 3 pinning is reduced by a significant amount, since the attacker can only attach a maximum of 1000vB to your shared transaction.
This also enables some other cool things (again see #27463 for overall roadmap):
- Ephemeral Anchors
- Package RBF for these 1-parent-1-child packages. That means e.g. a commitment tx + child can replace another commitment tx using the child's fees.
- We can transition to a "single anchor" universe without worrying about package limit pinning. So current users of CPFP carve out would have something else to use.
- We can switch to a cluster-based mempool [5] (#27677#28676), which removes CPFP carve out [6].
[1]: Original mailing list post and discussion about RBF pinning problems https://gist.github.com/glozow/25d9662c52453bd08b4b4b1d3783b9ff, https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-January/019817.html
[2]: A FAQ is "we need this for cluster mempool, but is this still necessary afterwards?" There are some pinning issues that are fixed here and not fully fixed in cluster mempool, so we will still want this or something similar afterward.
[3]: Mailing list post for v3 https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-September/020937.html
[4]: Original PR #25038 also contains a lot of the discussion
[5]: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/an-overview-of-the-cluster-mempool-proposal/393/7
[6]: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/an-overview-of-the-cluster-mempool-proposal/393#the-cpfp-carveout-rule-can-no-longer-be-supported-12
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
ACK 29029df5c7
achow101:
ACK 29029df5c7
instagibbs:
ACK 29029df5c7 modulo that
Tree-SHA512: 9664b078890cfdca2a146439f8835c9d9ab483f43b30af8c7cd6962f09aa557fb1ce7689d5e130a2ec142235dbc8f21213881baa75241c5881660f9008d68450
13161ecf03 opt: Skip over barren combinations of tiny UTXOs (Murch)
b7672c7cdd opt: Skip checking max_weight separately (Murch)
1edd2baa37 opt: Cut if last addition was minimal weight (Murch)
5248e2a60d opt: Skip heavier UTXOs with same effective value (Murch)
9124c73742 opt: Tiebreak UTXOs by weight for CoinGrinder (Murch)
451be19dc1 opt: Skip evaluation of equivalent input sets (Murch)
407b1e3432 opt: Track remaining effective_value in lookahead (Murch)
5f84f3cc04 opt: Skip branches with worse weight (Murch)
d68bc74fb2 fuzz: Test optimality of CoinGrinder (Murch)
67df6c629a fuzz: Add CoinGrinder fuzz target (Murch)
1502231229 coinselection: Track whether CG completed (Murch)
7488acc646 test: Add coin_grinder_tests (Murch)
6cc9a46cd0 coinselection: Add CoinGrinder algorithm (Murch)
89d0956643 opt: Tie-break UTXO sort by waste for BnB (Murch)
aaee65823c doc: Document max_weight on BnB (Murch)
Pull request description:
***Please refer to the [topic on Delving Bitcoin](https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/gutterguard-and-coingrinder-simulation-results/279) discussing Gutter Guard/Coingrinder simulation results.***
Adds a coin selection algorithm that minimizes the weight of the input set while creating change.
Motivations
---
- At high feerates, using unnecessary inputs can significantly increase the fees
- Users are upset when fees are relatively large compared to the amount sent
- Some users struggle to maintain a sufficient count of UTXOs in their wallet
Approach
---
So far, Bitcoin Core has used a balanced approach to coin selection, where it will generate multiple input set candidates using various coin selection algorithms and pick the least wasteful among their results, but not explicitly minimize the input set weight. Under some circumstances, we _do_ want to minimize the weight of the input set. Sometimes changeless solutions require many or heavy inputs, and there is not always a changeless solution for Branch and Bound to find in the first place. This can cause expensive transactions unnecessarily. Given a wallet with sufficient funds, `CoinGrinder` will pick the minimal-waste input set for a transaction with a change output. The current implementation only runs `CoinGrinder` at feerates over 3×long-term-feerate-estimate (by default 30 ṩ/vB), which may be a decent compromise between our goal to reduce costs for the users, but still permit transactions at lower feerates to naturally reduce the wallet’s UTXO pool to curb bloat.
Trade-offs
---
Simulations for my thesis on coin selection ([see Section 6.3.2.1 [PDF]](https://murch.one/erhardt2016coinselection.pdf)) suggest that minimizing the input set for all transactions tends to grind a wallet’s UTXO pool to dust (pun intended): an approach selecting inputs per coin-age-priority (in effect similar to “largest first selection”) on average produced a UTXO pool with 15× the UTXO count as Bitcoin Core’s Knapsack-based Coin Selection then (in 2016). Therefore, I do not recommend running `CoinGrinder` under all circumstances, but only at extreme feerates or when we have another good reason to minimize the input set for other reasons. In the long-term, we should introduce additional metrics to score different input set candidates, e.g. on basis of their privacy and wallet health impact, to pick from all our coin selection results, but until then, we may want to limit use of `CoinGrinder` in other ways.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 13161ecf03
sr-gi:
ACK [13161ec](13161ecf03)
sipa:
ACK 13161ecf03
Tree-SHA512: 895b08b2ebfd0b71127949b7dba27146a6d10700bf8590402b14f261e7b937f4e2e1b24ca46de440c35f19349043ed2eba4159dc2aa3edae57721384186dae40
The goal of the function is to erase the wallet transactions that
match the inputted hashes. There is no need to traverse the database,
reading record by record, to then perform single entry removals for
each of them.
To ensure consistency and improve performance, this change-set removes
all tx records within a single atomic db batch operation, as well as
it cleans up code, improves error handling and simplifies the
transactions removal process entirely.
This optimizes the removal of watch-only transactions during the wallet
migration process and the 'removeprunedfunds' RPC command.
Given a lot of small amount UTXOs it is possible that the lookahead
indicates sufficient funds, but any combination of them would push us
beyond the current best_weight.
We can estimate a lower bound for the minimal necessary weight to reach
target from the maximal amount and minimal weight in the tail of the
UTXO pool: if adding a number of hypothetical UTXOs of this maximum
amount and minimum weight would not be able to beat `best_weight`, we
can SHIFT to the omission branch, and CUT if the last selected UTXO is
not heavier than the minimum weight of the remainder.
In situations where we have UTXO groups of various weight, we can CUT
rather than SHIFT when we exceeded the max_weight or the best
selection’s weight while the last step was equal to the minimum weight
in the lookahead.
When two successive UTXOs differ in weight but match in effective value,
we can skip the second if the first is not selected, because all input
sets we can generate by swapping out a lighter UTXOs with a heavier UTXO
of matching effective value would be strictly worse.
When two successive UTXOs match in effective value and weight, we can
skip the second if the prior is not selected: adding it would create an
equivalent input set to a previously evaluated.
E.g. if we have three UTXOs with effective values {5, 3, 3} of the same
weight each, we want to evaluate
{5, _, _}, {5, 3, _}, {5, 3, 3}, {_, 3, _}, {_, 3, 3},
but skip {5, _, 3}, and {_, _, 3}, because the first 3 is not selected,
and we therefore do not need to evaluate the second 3 at the same
position in the input set.
If we reach the end of the branch, we must SHIFT the previously selected
UTXO group instead.
Introduces a dedicated data structure to track the total
effective_value available in the remaining UTXOs at each index of the
UTXO pool. In contrast to the approach in BnB, this allows us to
immediately jump to a lower index instead of visiting every UTXO to add
back their eff_value to the lookahead.
CoinGrinder may not be able to exhaustively search all potentially
interesting combinations for large UTXO pools, so we keep track of
whether the search was terminated by the iteration limit.
5ca9b24da1 test: Add makefile target for running unit tests (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
`make check` runs a bunch of other subtree tests that exercise code that is hardly ever changed and have a comparatively long runtime. There seems to be no target for running just the unit tests, so add one.
Alternatively the secp256k1 tests could be removed from the `check-local` target, reducing its runtime. This was rejected before though in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20264.
ACKs for top commit:
delta1:
utACK 5ca9b24da1
edilmedeiros:
Tested ACK 5ca9b24da1
achow101:
ACK 5ca9b24da1
ryanofsky:
Tested ACK 5ca9b24da1.
Tree-SHA512: 470969d44585d7cc33ad038a16e791db9e2be8469f52ddf122c46f20776fad34e6a48f988861a132c42540158fed05f3cf66fcc3bea05708253daaa35af54339
Ensure we are checking sigop-adjusted virtual size by creating setups
and packages where sigop cost is larger than bip141 vsize.
Co-authored-by: Gregory Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com>
e064487ca2 addrman, refactor: improve stochastic test in `AddSingle` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR changes this algorithm to be O(1) instead of O(n). Also, in the current implementation, if `pinfo->nRefCount` is 0, we created an unnecessary variable (`nFactor`), this changes it. the change is relatively simple and does not cause conflicts.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e064487ca2
amitiuttarwar:
ACK e064487ca2
stratospher:
ACK e064487ca2. simple use of << instead of a loop, didn't observe any behaviour difference before and after.
Tree-SHA512: ff0a65155e47f65d2ce3cb5a3fd7a86efef1861181143df13a9d8e59cb16aee9be2f8801457bba8478b17fac47b015bff5cc656f6fac2ccc071ee7178a38d291
fab41697a5 Allow int8_t optimized vector serialization (MarcoFalke)
facaa14785 Faster std::byte (pre)vector (un)serialize (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently, large vectors of `std::byte` are (un)serialized byte-by-byte, which is slow. Fix this, by enabling the already existing optimization for them.
On my system this gives a 10x speedup for `./src/bench/bench_bitcoin --filter=PrevectorDeserializeTrivial`, when `std::byte` are used:
```diff
diff --git a/src/bench/prevector.cpp b/src/bench/prevector.cpp
index 2524e215e4..76b16bc34e 100644
--- a/src/bench/prevector.cpp
+++ b/src/bench/prevector.cpp
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ struct nontrivial_t {
static_assert(!std::is_trivially_default_constructible<nontrivial_t>::value,
"expected nontrivial_t to not be trivially constructible");
-typedef unsigned char trivial_t;
+typedef std::byte trivial_t;
static_assert(std::is_trivially_default_constructible<trivial_t>::value,
"expected trivial_t to be trivially constructible");
```
However, the optimization does not cover `signed char`. Fix that as well.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK fab41697a5
achow101:
ACK fab41697a5
TheCharlatan:
ACK fab41697a5
Tree-SHA512: a3e20f375fd1d0e0dedb827a8ce528de1173ea69660c8c891ad1343a86b422072f6505096fca0d3f8af4442fbe1378a02e32d5974919d4e88ff06934d0258cba
86960cdb7f wallet: migration, batch addressbook records removal (furszy)
342c45f80e wallet: addressbook migration, batch db writes (furszy)
595bbe6e81 refactor: wallet, simplify addressbook migration (furszy)
d0943315b1 refactor: SetAddressBookWithDB, minimize number of map lookups (furszy)
bba4f8dcb5 refactor: SetAddrBookWithDB, signal only if write succeeded (furszy)
97b0753923 wallet: clean redundancies in DelAddressBook (furszy)
Pull request description:
Commits decoupled from #28574, focused on the address book cloning process
Includes:
1) DB batch operations and flow simplification for the address book migration process.
2) Code improvements to `CWallet::DelAddressBook` and `Wallet::SetAddrBookWithDB` methods.
These changes will let us consolidate all individual write operations that take place during the wallet migration process into a single db txn in the future.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 86960cdb7f
josibake:
reACK 86960cdb7f
Tree-SHA512: 10c941df3cd84fd8662b9c9ca6a1ed2c7402d38c677d2fc66b8b6c9edc6d73e827a5821487bbcacb5569d502934fa548fd10699e2ec45185f869e43174d8b2a1
cfcb9b1ecf test: wallet, coverage for concurrent db transactions (furszy)
548ecd1155 tests: Test for concurrent writes with db tx (Ava Chow)
395bcd2454 sqlite: Ensure that only one SQLiteBatch is writing to db at a time (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
The way that we have configured SQLite to run means that only one database transaction can be open at a time. Typically, each individual read and write operation will be its own transaction that is opened and committed automatically by SQLite. However, sometimes we want these operations to be batched into a multi-statement transaction, so `SQLiteBatch::TxnBegin`, `SQLiteBatch::TxnCommit`, and `SQLiteBatch::TxnAbort` are used to manage the transaction of the database.
However, once a db transaction is begun with one `SQLiteBatch`, any operations performed by another `SQLiteBatch` will also occur within the same transaction. Furthermore, those other `SQLiteBatch`s will not be expecting a transaction to be active, and will abort it once the `SQLiteBatch` is destructed. This is problematic as it will prevent some data from being written, and also cause the `SQLiteBatch` that opened the transaction in the first place to be in an unexpected state and throw an error.
To avoid this situation, we need to prevent the multiple batches from writing at the same time. To do so, I've implemented added a `CSemaphore` within `SQLiteDatabase` which will be used by any `SQLiteBatch` trying to do a write operation. `wait()` is called by `TxnBegin`, and at the beginning of `WriteKey`, `EraseKey`, and `ErasePrefix`. `post()` is called in `TxnCommit`, `TxnAbort` and at the end of `WriteKey`, `EraseKey`, and `ErasePrefix`. To avoid deadlocking on ` TxnBegin()` followed by a `WriteKey()`, `SQLiteBatch will now also track whether a transaction is in progress so that it knows whether to use the semaphore.
This issue is not a problem for BDB wallets since BDB uses WAL and provides transaction objects that must be used if an operation is to occur within a transaction. Specifically, we either pass a transaction pointer, or a nullptr, to all BDB operations, and this allows for concurrent transactions so it doesn't have this problem.
Fixes#29110
ACKs for top commit:
josibake:
ACK cfcb9b1ecf
furszy:
ACK cfcb9b1ecf
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK cfcb9b1ecf. This looks great and I think it is ready for merge. Just holding off because josibake seemed ready to review https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29112#issuecomment-1930372190 and might have more feedback.
Tree-SHA512: 2dd5a8e76df52451a40e0b8a87c7139d68a0d8e1bf2ebc79168cc313e192dab87cfa4270ff17fea4f7b370060d3bc9b5d294d50f7e07994d9b5a69b40397c927
Instead of doing one db transaction per removed record,
we now batch all removals in a single db transaction.
Speeding up the process and preventing the wallet from entering
an inconsistent state when any of the intermediate writes fail.
1) Encode destination only once (instead of three).
2) Fail if the entry's linked data cannot be removed.
3) Don't remove entry from memory if db write fail.
4) Notify GUI only if removal succeeded
a17fd33edd GUI: OptionsDialog: Replace verbose two-option font selector with simple combobox with Custom... choice (Luke Dashjr)
98e9ac5199 GUI: Use FontChoice type in OptionsModel settings abstraction (Luke Dashjr)
3a6757eed9 GUI: Load custom FontForMoney from QSettings (Luke Dashjr)
49eb97eff9 GUI: Add possibility for an explicit QFont for FontForMoney in OptionsModel (Luke Dashjr)
f2dfde80b8 GUI: Move "embedded font or not" decision into new OptionsModel::getFontForMoney method (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
This replaces the overly-verbose radio-button font setting (which only allows embedded or autodetected from system) with a simple combobox providing both existing options as well as a custom option to allow the user to select any font of their choice/style.
ACKs for top commit:
pablomartin4btc:
tested ACK a17fd33edd
hebasto:
ACK a17fd33edd, I have reviewed the code and tested it on Ubuntu 22.04. This is a UX improvement. https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/497#issuecomment-1341222673 might be addressed in a follow-up.
Tree-SHA512: 2f0a8bc1242a374c4b7dc6e34014400428b6d36063fa0b01c9f62a8bd6078adfbbca93d95c87e4ccb580d982fe10173e1d9a28bcec586591dd3f966c7b90fc5d
b14298c5bc fuzz: remove unused `args` and `context` from `FuzzedWallet` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
`ArgsManager args` and `WalletContext context` were previously used to create the wallet into `FuzzedWallet`. After fa15861763, they are not used anymore. This PR removes them.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK b14298c5bc
epiccurious:
utACK b14298c5bc
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK b14298c5bc
Tree-SHA512: 164e6a66ba05e11176a0cf68db6257f0ac07459cf7aa01ec4302b303c156c205a68128373a0b8daba0a6dfbff990af7fa14465a6341a296312fb20ea778c7a8c
e2ad343f69 wallet: remove unused `SignatureData` instances in spkm's `FillPSBT` methods (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
These are filled with signature data from a PSBT input, but not used anywhere after, hence they can be removed. Note that the same code is in the `SignPSBTInput` function where the `sigdata` result is indeed used.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e2ad343f69
brunoerg:
crACK e2ad343f69
Tree-SHA512: f0cabcc000bcea6bc7d7ec9d3be2e2a8accbdbffbe35252250ea2305b65a5813fde2b8096fbdd2c7cccdf417ea285183dc325fc2d210d88bce62978ce642930e
2bb25ce502 wallet: remove unused 'accept_no_keys' arg from decryption process (furszy)
Pull request description:
Found it while reviewing other PR. Couldn't contain myself from cleaning it up.
The wallet decryption process (`CheckDecryptionKey()` and `Unlock()`)
contains an arg 'accept_no_keys,' introduced in #13926, that has
never been used.
Additionally, this also removes the unimplemented `SplitWalletPath`
function.
ACKs for top commit:
delta1:
ACK 2bb25ce502
epiccurious:
utACK 2bb25ce502.
achow101:
ACK 2bb25ce502
theStack:
Code-review ACK 2bb25ce502
Tree-SHA512: e0537c994be19ca0032551d8a64cf1755c8997e04d21ee0522b31de26ad90b9eb02a8b415448257b60bced484b9d2a23b37586e12dc5ff6e35bdd8ff2165c6bf
A SQLiteBatch need to wait for any other batch to finish writing before
it can begin writing, otherwise db txn state may be incorrectly
modified. To enforce this, each SQLiteDatabase has a semaphore which
acts as a lock and is acquired by a batch when it begins a write, erase,
or a transaction, and is released by it when it is done.
To avoid deadlocking on itself for writing during a transaction,
SQLiteBatch also keeps track of whether it has begun a transaction.
e7fd70f4b6 [test] make v2transport arg in addconnection mandatory and few cleanups (stratospher)
Pull request description:
- make `v2transport` argument in `addconnection` regression-testing only RPC mandatory. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24748#discussion_r1470738750
- previously it was an optional arg with default `false` value.
- only place this RPC is used is in the [functional tests](11b436a66a/test/functional/test_framework/test_node.py (L742)) where we always pass the appropriate `v2transport` option to the RPC anyways. (and that too just for python dummy peer(`P2PInterface`) and bitcoind(`TestNode`) interactions)
- rename `v2_handshake()` to `_on_data_v2_handshake()` https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24748#discussion_r1466958424
- more compact return statement in `wait_for_reconnect()` https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24748#discussion_r1466979708
- assertion to check that empty version packets are received from `TestNode`.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
ACK e7fd70f4b6
theStack:
Code-review ACK e7fd70f4b6
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK e7fd70f4b6
Tree-SHA512: e66e29baccd91e1e4398b91f7d45c5fc7c2841d77d8a6178734586017bf2be63496721649da91848dec71da605ee31664352407d5bb896e624cc693767c61a1f
c819a83b4d Don't use scientific notation in log messages (Kristaps Kaupe)
Pull request description:
Don't see any benefits here, only harder to read for most of the users.
Before:
```
2024-01-16T13:11:36Z Dumped mempool: 8.165e-06s to copy, 0.00224268s to dump
```
After:
```
2024-01-16T13:11:36Z Dumped mempool: 0.000s to copy, 0.002s to dump
```
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
> > > > lgtm ACK [c819a83](c819a83b4d). can you update the PR description?
glozow:
lgtm ACK c819a83b4d. can you update the PR description?
Tree-SHA512: 0972e0a05934e1b014fdeca0c235065aa017ba9abf74b3018f514e4d8022ef02b7f042a07d3675144b51449492468aea6b5b0183233ad7f1bab887d18e3d06af
fa5cd66f0a test: Assumeutxo with more than just coinbase transactions (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the AU tests only check that loading a txout set with only coinbase outputs works.
Fix that by adding other transactions.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK fa5cd66f0a
glozow:
concept ACK fa5cd66f0a
Tree-SHA512: e090c41f73490ad72e36c478405bfd0716d46fbf5a131415095999da6503094a86689a179a84addae3562b760df64cdb67488f81692178c8ca8bf771b1e931ff
make check runs a bunch of other subtree tests that exercise code that
is hardly ever changed and have a comparatively long runtime. There
seems to be no target for running just the unit tests, so add one.
The wallet decryption process (CheckDecryptionKey() and Unlock())
contains an arg 'accept_no_keys,' introduced in #13926, that has
never been used.
Additionally, this also removes the unimplemented SplitWalletPath
function.
4da76ca247 test: Test migration of tx with both spendable and watchonly (Ava Chow)
c62a8d03a8 wallet: Keep txs that belong to both watchonly and migrated wallets (Ava Chow)
71cb28ea8c test: Make sure that migration test does not rescan on reloading (Ava Chow)
78ba0e6748 wallet: Reload the wallet if migration exited early (Ava Chow)
9332c7edda wallet: Write bestblock to watchonly and solvable wallets (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
A transaction does not necessarily have to belong to either the migrated wallet (with the private keys) and the watchonly wallet (with watchonly things), it could have multiple outputs with each isminetype. So we should be putting such transactions in one or the other wallet, but rather putting it in both.
I've added a test for this behavior, however the test also revealed a few other issues. Notably, it revealed that `migratewallet` would have the watchonly wallet rescan from genesis when it is reloaded at the end of migration. This could be a cause for migration appearing to be very slow. This is resolved by first writing best block records to the watchonly and solvable wallets, as well as updating the test to make sure that rescans don't happen.
The change to avoid rescans also found an issue where some of our early exits would result in unloading the wallet even though nothing happened. So there is also a commit to reload the wallet for such early exits.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 4da76ca247. This looks great. The code is actually cleaner than before, two bugs are fixed, and the test checking for rescanning is pretty clever and broadens test coverage.
furszy:
Code review ACK 4da76ca2
Tree-SHA512: 5fc210cff16ca6720d7b2d0616d7e3f295c974147854abc704cf99a3bfaad17572ada084859e7a1b1ca94da647ad130303219678f429b7995f85e040236db35c
3904123da9 tests: Test that descriptors flag is set for migrated blank wallets (Ava Chow)
072d506240 wallet: Make sure that the descriptors flag is set for blank wallets (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
While rebasing #28710 after #28976 was merged, I realized that although blank wallets were being moved to sqlite, `WALLET_FLAG_DESCRIPTORS` was not being set so those blank wallets would still continue to be treated as legacy wallets.
To fix that, just set the descriptor flags for blank wallets. Also added a test to catch this.
ACKs for top commit:
epiccurious:
Tested ACK 3904123da9.
delta1:
tested ACK 3904123da9
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 3904123da9
murchandamus:
code review ACK 3904123da9
Tree-SHA512: 9f6fe9c1899ca387ab909b1bb6956cd6bc5acbf941686ddc6c061f9b1ceec2cc9d009ff472486fc86e963f6068f0e2f1ae96282e7c630193797a9734c4f424ab
It is possible for a transaction that has an output that belongs to the
mgirated wallet, and another output that belongs to the watchonly
wallet. Such transaction should appear in both wallets during migration.
Migration will unload loaded wallets prior to beginning. It will then
perform some checks which may exit early. Such unloaded wallets should
be reloaded prior to exiting.
When migrating, we should also be writing the bestblock record to the
watchonly and solvable wallets to avoid rescanning on the reload as that
can be slow.
fad74bbbd0 refactor: Mark prevector iterator with std::contiguous_iterator_tag (MarcoFalke)
fab8a01048 refactor: Fix binary operator+ for prevector iterators (MarcoFalke)
fa44a60b2b refactor: Fix constness for prevector iterators (MarcoFalke)
facaa66b49 refactor: Add missing default constructor to prevector iterators (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently prevector iterators have many issues:
* Forward iterators (and stronger) must be default constructible (https://eel.is/c++draft/forward.iterators#1.2). Otherwise, some functions can not be instantiated, like `std::minmax_element`.
* Various `const` issues with random access iterators. For example, a `const iterator` is different from a `const_iterator`, because the first one holds a mutable reference and must also return it without `const`. Also, `operator+` must be callable regardless of the iterator object's `const`-ness.
* When adding an offset to random access iterators, both `x+n` and `n+x` must be specified, see https://eel.is/c++draft/random.access.iterators#tab:randomaccessiterator
Fix all issues.
Also, upgrade the `std::random_access_iterator_tag` (C++17) to `std::contiguous_iterator_tag` (C++20)
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
ACK fad74bbbd0
stickies-v:
ACK fad74bbbd0
willcl-ark:
ACK fad74bbbd0
Tree-SHA512: b1ca778a31602af94b323b8feaf993833ec78be09f1d438a68335485a4ba97f52125fdd977ffb9541b89f8d45be0105076aa07b5726936133519aae832556e0b
b851c5385d fuzz: extend ConsumeNetAddr() to return I2P and CJDNS addresses (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
In the process of doing so, refactor `ConsumeNetAddr()` to generate the addresses from IPv4, IPv6, Tor, I2P and CJDNS networks in the same way - by preparing some random stream and deserializing from it. Similar code was already found in `RandAddr()`.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK b851c5385d
mzumsande:
ACK b851c5385d
brunoerg:
utACK b851c5385d
Tree-SHA512: 9905acff0e996f30ddac0c14e5ee9e1db926c7751472c06d6441111304242b563f7c942b162b209d80e8fb65a97249792eef9ae0a96100419565bf7f59f59676
987a1b51ee init: settings, do not load auto-generated warning msg (furszy)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29144#issuecomment-1907071391.
The settings warning message is meant to be used only to discourage users from
modifying the file manually. Therefore, there is no need to keep it in memory.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 987a1b51ee
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 987a1b51ee. Seems like a clean, simple fix
Tree-SHA512: 3f2bdcf4b4a9cadb396dcff9b43155211eeed018527a07356970a341d139ad18edbd1a4d369377c8907b8ec1f19ee2ab8aacf85a887379e6d57a8a6db2403d51
c11c404281 tests: Test migration of blank wallets (Andrew Chow)
563b2a60d6 wallet: Better error message when missing LegacySPKM during migration (Andrew Chow)
b1d2c771d4 wallet: Check for descriptors flag before migration (Andrew Chow)
8c127ff1ed wallet: Skip key and script migration for blank wallets (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Blank wallets (wallets without any keys are scripts) are being detected as already being descriptor wallets even though they are not. This is because the check for whether a wallet is already a descriptor wallet uses the presence of a `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan` which is only setup when keys or scripts are found. This PR resolves this issue by checking for the descriptor wallet flag instead and subsequently skipping the keys and scripts part of migration for blank wallets.
Fixes the issue mentioned in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28868#issuecomment-1809641110
ACKs for top commit:
furszy:
reACK c11c404281. CI failure is unrelated.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK c11c404281
Tree-SHA512: 2466fdf1542eb8489c841253191f85dc88365493f0bb3395b67dee3e43709a9993c68b9d7623657b54b779adbe68fc81962d60efef4802c5d461f154167af7f4
ff9039f6ea Remove GetAdjustedTime (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
This picks up parts of #25908.
The use of adjusted time is removed from validation code while the warning to users if their clock is out of sync with the rest of the network remains.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK ff9039f6ea
achow101:
ACK ff9039f6ea
maflcko:
lgtm ACK ff9039f6ea🤽
stickies-v:
ACK ff9039f6ea
Tree-SHA512: d1f6b9445c236915503fd2ea828f0d3b92285a5dbc677b168453276115e349972edbad37194d8becd9136d8e7219b576af64ec51c72bdb1923e57e405c0483fc
0bef1042ce net: enable v2transport by default (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This enables BIP324's v2 transport by default (see #27634):
* Inbound connections will auto-sense whether v1 or v2 is in use.
* Automatic outbound connections will use v2 if `NODE_P2P_V2` was set in addr gossip, but retry with v1 if met with immediate failure.
* Manual outbound connections will default to v2, but retry with v1 if met with immediate failure.
It remains possible to run with `-v2transport=0` to disable all of these, and make all outbound and inbound connections v1. It also remains possible to specify the `v2transport` argument to the `addnode` RPC as `false`, to disable attempting a v2 connection for that particular added node.
ACKs for top commit:
stratospher:
ACK 0bef104.
josibake:
reACK 0bef1042ce
achow101:
ACK 0bef1042ce
naumenkogs:
ACK 0bef1042ce
theStack:
ACK 0bef1042ce
willcl-ark:
crACK 0bef1042ce
BrandonOdiwuor:
utACK 0bef1042ce
pablomartin4btc:
re ACK 0bef1042ce
kristapsk:
utACK 0bef1042ce
Tree-SHA512: 3f17a91e318b9304c40c74a7a5b231149f664ae684d13e9739a05be6c05ba9720f3c3c62da6a73ace0ae8ce733f1c8410b211f9fa15694e6a8d28999ab9882d8
b298242c8d test: sqlite, add coverage for dangling to-be-reverted db txns (furszy)
fc0e747192 sqlite: guard against dangling to-be-reverted db transactions (furszy)
472d2ca981 sqlite: introduce HasActiveTxn method (furszy)
dca874e838 sqlite: add ability to interrupt statements (furszy)
fdf9f66909 test: wallet db, exercise deadlock after write failure (furszy)
Pull request description:
Discovered while was reviewing #29112, specifically https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29112#pullrequestreview-1821862931.
If the db handler that initiated the database transaction is destroyed,
the ongoing transaction cannot be left dangling when the db txn fails
to abort. It must be forcefully reverted; otherwise, any subsequent
db handler executing a write operation will dump the dangling,
to-be-reverted transaction data to disk.
This not only breaks the isolation property but also results in the
improper storage of incomplete information on disk, impacting
the wallet consistency.
This PR fixes the issue by resetting the db connection, automatically
rolling back the transaction (per https://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/close.html)
when the handler object is being destroyed and the txn abortion failed.
Testing Notes
Can verify the failure by reverting the fix e5217fea and running the test.
It will fail without e5217fea and pass with it.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK b298242c8d
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK b298242c8d. Just fix for exec result codes and comment update since last review.
Tree-SHA512: 44ba0323ab21440e79e9d7791bc1c56a8873c8bd3e8f6a85641b91576e1293011fa8032d8ae5b0580f3fb7a949356f7b9676693d7ceffa617aaad9f6569993eb
`TestNode::add_outbound_p2p_connection()` is the only place where
addconnection test-only RPC is used. here, we always pass the
appropriate v2transport option to addconnection RPC.
currently the v2transport option for addconnection RPC is optional.
so simply make the v2transport option mandatory instead.
27f260aa6e net: remove now unused global 'g_initial_block_download_completed' (furszy)
aff7d92b15 test: add coverage for peerman adaptive connections service flags (furszy)
6ed53602ac net: peer manager, dynamically adjust desirable services flag (furszy)
9f36e591c5 net: move state dependent peer services flags (furszy)
f9ac96b8d6 net: decouple state independent service flags from desirable ones (furszy)
97df4e3887 net: store best block tip time inside PeerManager (furszy)
Pull request description:
Derived from #28120 discussion.
By relocating the peer desirable services flags into the peer manager, we
allow the connections acceptance process to handle post-IBD potential
stalling scenarios.
The peer manager will be able to dynamically adjust the services flags
based on the node's proximity to the tip (back and forth). Allowing the node
to recover from the following post-IBD scenario:
Suppose the node has successfully synced the chain, but later experienced
dropped connections and remained inactive for a duration longer than the limited
peers threshold (the timeframe within which limited peers can provide blocks). In
such cases, upon reconnecting to the network, the node might only establish
connections with limited peers, filling up all available outbound slots. Resulting
in an inability to synchronize the chain (because limited peers will not provide
blocks older than the `NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED_MIN_BLOCKS` threshold).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 27f260aa6e
vasild:
ACK 27f260aa6e
naumenkogs:
ACK 27f260aa6e
mzumsande:
Light Code Review ACK 27f260aa6e
andrewtoth:
ACK 27f260aa6e
Tree-SHA512: 07befb9bcd0b60a4e7c45e4429c02e7b6c66244f0910f4b2ad97c9b98258b6f46c914660a717b5ed4ef4814d0dbfae6e18e6559fe9bec7d0fbc2034109200953
If the handler that initiated the database transaction is destroyed,
the ongoing transaction cannot be left dangling when the db txn fails
to abort. It must be forcefully reversed; otherwise, any subsequent
db handler executing a write operation will dump the dangling,
to-be-reverted transaction data to disk.
This not only breaks the database isolation property but also results
in the improper storage of incomplete information on disk, impacting
the wallet consistency.
By encapsulating sqlite3_exec into its own standalone method
and introducing the 'SQliteExecHandler' class, we enable the
ability to test db statements execution failures within the
unit test framework.
This is used in the following-up commit to exercise a deadlock
and improve our wallet db error handling code.
Moreover, the future encapsulation of other sqlite functions
within this class will contribute to minimize the impact of
any future API changes.
31cce4a1bd doc: update `BroadcastTransaction` comment (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
`BroadcastTransaction` is also called by `submitpackage` RPC.
All transactions that are accepted into the mempool post package processing are broadcasted to peers individually here
ea4ddd8652/src/rpc/mempool.cpp (L926)
It's not maintainable to list all the callers of a function.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
ACK 31cce4a1bd
kristapsk:
ACK 31cce4a1bd
naumenkogs:
ACK 31cce4a1bd
Tree-SHA512: 8aea92c53c1911a0ac36fe9e3a24d37d83e7d9b40a16f0832bfa7a719328697621e3f94a5dc80d1840e7ae705e0c3aab7a3df7064986e1e53a4a4114adf078a8
9819db4cca validation: move nChainTx assert down in CheckBlockIndex (Martin Zumsande)
033477dba6 doc: fix checkblockindex comments (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
The two assumptions there were described as test-only, which has led to confusion whether they should exist.
However, they are necessary in general, as the changed comment explains - without them, the check would fail everywhere where it is enabled.
The second commit moves this assert down to the other checks.
Closes#29261
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
ACK 9819db4cca 🌦
naumenkogs:
ACK 9819db4cca
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9819db4cca. Thanks for figuring this issue out and fixing it. Would suggest changing pr name from "improve comments" to "fix misleading comments" since previous comments were wrong about the reasons the conditions are needed.
Tree-SHA512: 3f77791253eb0c97f8153dd8ae1c567f43f6387ea7a53efea94817463c672a4e11d548aa7eff62235346ff0713ff4d6fe08f9ec50d0c30a1e6b6d27b9918b419
bc9283c441 [test] Add functional test to test early key response behaviour in BIP 324 (stratospher)
ffe6a56d75 [test] Check whether v2 TestNode performs downgrading (stratospher)
ba737358a3 [test] Add functional tests to test v2 P2P behaviour (stratospher)
4115cf9956 [test] Ignore BIP324 decoy messages (stratospher)
8c054aa04d [test] Allow inbound and outbound connections supporting v2 P2P protocol (stratospher)
382894c3ac [test] Reconnect using v1 P2P when v2 P2P terminates due to magic byte mismatch (stratospher)
a94e350ac0 [test] Build v2 P2P messages (stratospher)
bb7bffed79 [test] Use lock for sending P2P messages in test framework (stratospher)
5b91fb14ab [test] Read v2 P2P messages (stratospher)
05bddb20f5 [test] Perform initial v2 handshake (stratospher)
a049d1bd08 [test] Introduce EncryptedP2PState object in P2PConnection (stratospher)
b89fa59e71 [test] Construct class to handle v2 P2P protocol functions (stratospher)
8d6c848a48 [test] Move MAGIC_BYTES to messages.py (stratospher)
595ad4b168 [test/crypto] Add ECDH (stratospher)
4487b80517 [rpc/net] Allow v2 p2p support in addconnection (stratospher)
Pull request description:
This PR introduces support for v2 P2P encryption(BIP 324) in the existing functional test framework and adds functional tests for the same.
### commits overview
1. introduces a new class `EncryptedP2PState` to store the keys, functions for performing the initial v2 handshake and encryption/decryption.
3. this class is used by `P2PConnection` in inbound/outbound connections to perform the initial v2 handshake before the v1 version handshake. Only after the initial v2 handshake is performed do application layer P2P messages(version, verack etc..) get exchanged. (in a v2 connection)
- `v2_state` is the object of class `EncryptedP2PState` in `P2PConnection` used to store its keys, session-id etc.
- a node [advertising](https://github.com/stratospher/blogosphere/blob/main/integration_test_bip324.md#advertising-to-support-v2-p2p) support for v2 P2P is different from a node actually [supporting v2 P2P](https://github.com/stratospher/blogosphere/blob/main/integration_test_bip324.md#supporting-v2-p2p) (differ when false advertisement of services occur)
- introduce a boolean variable `supports_v2_p2p` in `P2PConnection` to denote if it supports v2 P2P.
- introduce a boolean variable `advertises_v2_p2p` to denote whether `P2PConnection` which mimics peer behaviour advertises V2 P2P support. Default option is `False`.
- In the test framework, you can create Inbound and Outbound connections to `TestNode`
1. During **Inbound Connections**, `P2PConnection` is the initiator [`TestNode` <--------- `P2PConnection`]
- Case 1:
- if the `TestNode` advertises/signals v2 P2P support (means `self.nodes[i]` set up with `"-v2transport=1"`), different behaviour will be exhibited based on whether:
1. `P2PConnection` supports v2 P2P
2. `P2PConnection` does not support v2 P2P
- In a real world scenario, the initiator node would intrinsically know if they support v2 P2P based on whatever code they choose to run. However, in the test scenario where we mimic peer behaviour, we have no way of knowing if `P2PConnection` should support v2 P2P or not. So `supports_v2_p2p` boolean variable is used as an option to enable support for v2 P2P in `P2PConnection`.
- Since the `TestNode` advertises v2 P2P support (using "-v2transport=1"), our initiator `P2PConnection` would send:
1. (if the `P2PConnection` supports v2 P2P) ellswift + garbage bytes to initiate the connection
2. (if the `P2PConnection` does not support v2 P2P) version message to initiate the connection
- Case 2:
- if the `TestNode` doesn't signal v2 P2P support; `P2PConnection` being the initiator would send version message to initiate a connection.
2. During **Outbound Connections** [TestNode --------> P2PConnection]
- initiator `TestNode` would send:
- (if the `P2PConnection` advertises v2 P2P) ellswift + garbage bytes to initiate the connection
- (if the `P2PConnection` advertises v2 P2P) version message to initiate the connection
- Suppose `P2PConnection` advertises v2 P2P support when it actually doesn't support v2 P2P (false advertisement scenario)
- `TestNode` sends ellswift + garbage bytes
- `P2PConnection` receives but can't process it and disconnects.
- `TestNode` then tries using v1 P2P and sends version message
- `P2PConnection` receives/processes this successfully and they communicate on v1 P2P
4. the encrypted P2P messages follow a different format - 3 byte length + 1-13 byte message_type + payload + 16 byte MAC
5. includes support for testing decoy messages and v2 connection downgrade(using false advertisement - when a v2 node makes an outbound connection to a node which doesn't support v2 but is advertised as v2 by some malicious
intermediary)
### run the tests
* functional test - `test/functional/p2p_v2_encrypted.py` `test/functional/p2p_v2_earlykeyresponse.py`
I'm also super grateful to @ dhruv for his really valuable feedback on this branch.
Also written a more elaborate explanation here - https://github.com/stratospher/blogosphere/blob/main/integration_test_bip324.md
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK bc9283c441
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK bc9283c441
theStack:
Code-review ACK bc9283c441
glozow:
ACK bc9283c441
Tree-SHA512: 9b54ed27e925e1775e0e0d35e959cdbf2a9a1aab7bcf5d027e66f8b59780bdd0458a7a4311ddc7dd67657a4a2a2cd5034ead75524420d58a83f642a8304c9811
bbf218d061 crypto: remove sha256_sse4 from the base crypto helper lib (Cory Fields)
4dbd0475d8 crypto: remove use of BUILD_BITCOIN_INTERNAL macro in sha256 (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
Replace it with a more explicit `DISABLE_OPTIMIZED_SHA256` and clean up some.
The macro was originally used by libbitcoinconsensus which opts out of optimized sha256 for the sake of simplicity.
Also remove the `BUILD_BITCOIN_INTERNAL` define from libbitcoinkernel for now as it does not export an api. When it does we can pick a less confusing define to control its exports.
Removing the define should have the effect of enabling sha256 optimizations for the kernel.
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK bbf218d061
hebasto:
re-ACK bbf218d061
Tree-SHA512: 7c17592bb2d3e671779f96903cb36887c5785408213bffbda1ae37b66e6bcfaffaefd0c1bf2d1a407060cd377e3d4881cde3a73c429a1aacb677f370314a066a
8023640a71 qt: Avoid non-self-contained Windows header (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Using the `windows.h` header guarantees correctness regardless of the content of other headers.
For more details, please refer to https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4845198/fatal-error-no-target-architecture-in-visual-studio
Fixes the MSVC build when using the upcoming CMake-based build system and Qt packages installed via the vcpkg package manager.
Related to https://github.com/hebasto/bitcoin/pull/77.
ACKs for top commit:
theuni:
ACK 8023640a71. It's not completely clear to me why this currently works, but I don't think it's worth wasting more time on. `windows.h` seems more correct regardless.
Tree-SHA512: 1c03f909943111fb2663f86d33ec9a947bc5903819e5bd94f436f6b0782d9f5c5d80d9cd3490674ecd8921b2981c509e97e41580bccc436f8b5c7db84b4e493c
fa3373d3ad refactor: Compile unreachable code (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
When unreachable code isn't compiled, compile failures are not detected.
Fix this by leaving it unreachable, but compiling it.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28999#discussion_r1465010916
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa3373d3ad
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa3373d3ad. This looks good, and should prevent code in the else blocks from accidentally breaking.
Tree-SHA512: 3a3764915dfc935bf5d7a48f1ca151dcbac340c1cbdce8236b24ae9b4f04d6ee9771ed058ca60bcbca6e19d13671de3517f828a8f7ab6444c7cc4e3538d1ba4e
d298ff8b62 During IBD, prune as much as possible until we get close to where we will eventually keep blocks (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
This should reduce pruning flushes even more, speeding up IBD with pruning on systems that have a sufficient dbcache.
Assumes 1 MB per block between tip and best header chain. Simply adds this to the buffer pruning is trying to leave available, which results in pruning almost everything up until we get close to where we need to be keeping blocks.
ACKs for top commit:
andrewtoth:
ACK d298ff8b62
fjahr:
utACK d298ff8b62
achow101:
ACK d298ff8b62
Tree-SHA512: 2a482376bfb177e2ba7c2f0bb0b58b02efdb38b34755a18d1fc3e869df5959c85b6f1009e1386fa8b89c4f90d520383e36bd3e21dec221042315134efb1a455b
00c1e2aa44 build: fix optimisation flags used for --coverage (fanquake)
1dc2c9b385 ci: cleanup C*FLAG usage in Valgrind jobs (fanquake)
6cc2a38c13 build: add sanitizer flags to configure output (fanquake)
08cd5aca18 build: always set -g -O2 in CORE_CXXFLAGS (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Rather than trying to sporadically rely on / override Autoconf default behaviour. Just always override (if unset), and always set the flags we want (which are the same as the Autoconf defaults).
Removes the need for duplicate code to clear (if not overridden) `CXXFLAGS`.
Fixes cases of "missing" `-O2`. i.e this PR when running a Valgrind CI job with changes here:
```bash
CXXFLAGS = -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=$(abs_top_srcdir)=. -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -mbranch-protection=bti -Werror -fsanitize=fuzzer -gdwarf-4
```
Fixes configure output to reflect actual compilation flag ordering, so it's useful.
Note that if we do still end up with a duplicate "-g -O2" when compiling, that has no effect, and I don't really thinks it's something worth trying to optimize.
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
lgtm ACK 00c1e2aa44
hebasto:
ACK 00c1e2aa44, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK. Also tested `ci/test/00_setup_env_native_valgrind.sh`.
theuni:
ACK 00c1e2aa44
Tree-SHA512: cf6c7acf813ba10b198561e83eb72e9b2532a39cb1767c452d031e82921dcd42a47b129735b24c4e36131fd0c8fe7457f7cae870c1e011cdfdd430bdc4d4912b
The settings warning message is meant to be used only to discourage
users from modifying the file manually. Therefore, there is no need
to keep it in memory.
