c819a83b4d Don't use scientific notation in log messages (Kristaps Kaupe)
Pull request description:
Don't see any benefits here, only harder to read for most of the users.
Before:
```
2024-01-16T13:11:36Z Dumped mempool: 8.165e-06s to copy, 0.00224268s to dump
```
After:
```
2024-01-16T13:11:36Z Dumped mempool: 0.000s to copy, 0.002s to dump
```
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
> > > > lgtm ACK [c819a83](c819a83b4d). can you update the PR description?
glozow:
lgtm ACK c819a83b4d. can you update the PR description?
Tree-SHA512: 0972e0a05934e1b014fdeca0c235065aa017ba9abf74b3018f514e4d8022ef02b7f042a07d3675144b51449492468aea6b5b0183233ad7f1bab887d18e3d06af
fa5cd66f0a test: Assumeutxo with more than just coinbase transactions (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the AU tests only check that loading a txout set with only coinbase outputs works.
Fix that by adding other transactions.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK fa5cd66f0a
glozow:
concept ACK fa5cd66f0a
Tree-SHA512: e090c41f73490ad72e36c478405bfd0716d46fbf5a131415095999da6503094a86689a179a84addae3562b760df64cdb67488f81692178c8ca8bf771b1e931ff
ff9039f6ea Remove GetAdjustedTime (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
This picks up parts of #25908.
The use of adjusted time is removed from validation code while the warning to users if their clock is out of sync with the rest of the network remains.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK ff9039f6ea
achow101:
ACK ff9039f6ea
maflcko:
lgtm ACK ff9039f6ea🤽
stickies-v:
ACK ff9039f6ea
Tree-SHA512: d1f6b9445c236915503fd2ea828f0d3b92285a5dbc677b168453276115e349972edbad37194d8becd9136d8e7219b576af64ec51c72bdb1923e57e405c0483fc
b1318dcc56 test: change `m_submitted_in_package` input to fuzz data provider boolean (ismaelsadeeq)
5615e16b70 tx fees: update `m_from_disconnected_block` to `m_mempool_limit_bypassed` (ismaelsadeeq)
fcd4296648 doc: fix typo and update incorrect comment (ismaelsadeeq)
562664d263 test: wait for fee estimator to catch up before estimating fees (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
This is a simple PR that does two things
1. Fixes#29000 by waiting for the fee estimator to catch up after `removeForBlock` calls before calling `estimateFee` in the `BlockPolicyEstimates` unit test.
2. Addressed some outstanding review comments from #28368
- Updated `NewMempoolTransactionInfo::m_from_disconnected_block` to `NewMempoolTransactionInfo::m_mempool_limit_bypassed` which now correctly indicates what the boolean does.
- Changed input of `processTransaction`'s tx_info `m_submitted_in_package` input from false to fuzz data provider boolean.
- Fixed some typos, and update incorrect comment
ACKs for top commit:
martinus:
re-ACK b1318dcc56
glozow:
utACK b1318dcc56
Tree-SHA512: 45268729bc044da4748fe004524e0df696d2ec92c5bd053db9aad6e15675f3838429b2a7b9061a6b694be4dc319d1782a876b44df506ddd439d62ad07252d0e1
The boolean indicates whether the transaction was added without enforcing mempool
fee limits. m_mempool_limit_bypassed is the correct variable name.
Also changes NewMempoolTransactionInfo booleans descriptions to the format that
is consistent with the codebase.
This change is mostly a refectoring that removes some code and gets rid of an
unnecessary layer of indirection after #27861
But it is not a pure refactoring since StartShutdown, AbortShutdown, and
WaitForShutdown functions used to abort on failure, and the replacement code
logs or returns errors instead.
91504cbe0d rpc: `SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue` on fee estimation RPC's (ismaelsadeeq)
714523918b tx fees, policy: CBlockPolicyEstimator update from `CValidationInterface` notifications (ismaelsadeeq)
dff5ad3b99 CValidationInterface: modify the parameter of `TransactionAddedToMempool` (ismaelsadeeq)
91532bd382 tx fees, policy: update `CBlockPolicyEstimator::processBlock` parameter (ismaelsadeeq)
bfcd401368 CValidationInterface, mempool: add new callback to `CValidationInterface` (ismaelsadeeq)
0889e07987 tx fees, policy: cast with static_cast instead of C-Style cast (ismaelsadeeq)
a0e3eb7549 tx fees, policy: bugfix: move `removeTx` into reason != `BLOCK` condition (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
This is an attempt to #11775
This Pr will enable fee estimator to listen to ValidationInterface notifications to process new transactions added and removed from the mempool.
This PR includes the following changes:
- Added a new callback to the Validation Interface `MempoolTransactionsRemovedForConnectedBlock`, which notifies listeners about the transactions that have been removed due to a new block being connected, along with the height at which the transactions were removed.
- Modified the `TransactionAddedToMempool` callback parameter to include additional information about the transaction needed for fee estimation.
- Updated `CBlockPolicyEstimator` to process transactions using` CTransactionRef` instead of `CTxMempoolEntry.`
- Implemented the `CValidationInterface` interface in `CBlockPolicyEstimater` and overridden the `TransactionAddedToMempool`, `TransactionRemovedFromMempool`, and `MempoolTransactionsRemovedForConnectedBlock` methods to receive updates from their notifications.
Prior to this PR, the fee estimator updates from the mempool, i.e whenever a new block is connected all transactions in the block that are in our mempool are going to be removed using the `removeForBlock` function in `txmempool.cpp`.
This removal triggered updates to the fee estimator. As a result, the fee estimator would block mempool's `cs` until it finished updating every time a new block was connected.
Instead of being blocked only on mempool tx removal, we were blocking on both tx removal and fee estimator updating.
If we want to further improve fee estimation, or add heavy-calulation steps to it, it is currently not viable as we would be slowing down block relay in the process
This PR is smaller in terms of the changes made compared to #11775, as it focuses solely on enabling fee estimator updates from the validationInterface/cscheduler thread notifications.
I have not split the validation interface because, as I understand it, the rationale behind the split in #11775 was to have `MempoolInterface` signals come from the mempool and `CValidationInterface` events come from validation. I believe this separation can be achieved in a separate refactoring PR when the need arises.
Also left out some commits from #11775
- Some refactoring which are no longer needed.
- Handle reorgs much better in fee estimator.
- Track witness hash malleation in fee estimator
I believe they are a separate change that can come in a follow-up after this.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 91504cbe0d
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK 91504cbe0d
willcl-ark:
ACK 91504cbe0d
Tree-SHA512: 846dfb9da57a8a42458827b8975722d153907fe6302ad65748d74f311e1925557ad951c3d95fe71fb90ddcc8a3710c45abb343ab86b88780871cb9c38c72c7b1
705e3f1de0 refactor: Make CTxMemPoolEntry only explicitly copyable (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
This has the goal of prohibiting users from accidentally creating runtime failures, e.g. by interacting with iterator_to with a copied entry. This was brought up here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28886#issuecomment-1814794954.
CTxMemPoolEntry is already implicitly not move-constructable. So be explicit about this and use a std::list to collect the values in the policy_estimator fuzz test instead of a std::vector.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
ACK 705e3f1de0🌯
achow101:
ACK 705e3f1de0
ajtowns:
ACK 705e3f1de0
ismaelsadeeq:
ACK 705e3f1de0
Tree-SHA512: 62056905c679c919d00f9ae065ed66ac986e7e7062015aea542843d8deecda57104d7a68d002f7b20afa3164f8e9215d2d2d002c167224129540e3b1bd0712cc
I changed my DNS seeds to .net from .org to avoid issues with DNS blacklisting,
that falsely thinks my domain name is pointing to IP addresses with malware and
similar things. Right now there are CNAME records, so the .org addresses still
work. But eventually, if needed, I'll remove those CNAME's.
`CBlockPolicyEstimator` will implement `CValidationInterface` and
subscribe to its notification to process transactions added and removed
from the mempool.
Re-delegate calculation of `validForFeeEstimation` from validation to fee estimator.
Also clean up the validForFeeEstimation arg thats no longer needed in `CTxMempool`.
Co-authored-by: Matt Corallo <git@bluematt.me>
This commit adds a new callback `MempoolTransactionsRemovedForBlock` which notify
its listeners of the transactions that are removed from the mempool because a new
block is connected, along with the block height the transactions were removed.
The transactions are in `RemovedMempoolTransactionInfo` format.
`CTransactionRef`, base fee, virtual size, and height which the transaction was added
to the mempool are all members of the struct called `RemovedMempoolTransactionInfo`.
A struct `NewMempoolTransactionInfo`, which has fields similar to `RemovedMempoolTransactionInfo`,
will be added in a later commit, create a struct `TransactionInfo` with all similar fields.
They can both have a member with type `TransactionInfo`.
This has the goal of prohibiting users from accidentally creating
runtime failures, e.g. by interacting with iterator_to with a copied
entry.
CTxMemPoolEntry is already implicitly not move-constructable. So be
explicit about this and use a std::list to collect the values in the
policy_estimator fuzz test instead of a std::vector.
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
fa6b053b5c mempool: persist with XOR (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the `mempool.dat` file stores data received from remote peers as-is. This may be problematic when a program other than Bitcoin Core tries to interpret them by accident. For example, an anti-virus program or other program may scan the file and move it into quarantine, or delete it, or corrupt it.
While the local wallet is expected to re-submit any pending transactions, unrelated transactions may be missing from the mempool after a restart. This may cause fee estimates to be off, or may cause block relay to be slower.
Fix this, similar to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6650, by rolling a random XOR pattern over the dat file when writing or reading it.
Obviously this can only protect against programs that accidentally and unintentionally are trying to mess with the dat file. Any program that intentionally wants to mess with the dat file can still trivially do so.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK fa6b053b5c
glozow:
reACK fa6b053b5c
ismaelsadeeq:
ACK fa6b053b5c
Tree-SHA512: ded2ce3d81bc944b828263534e3178a1e45a914fe8e024f4a14c6561a73e301820944ecc75dd704b3d4221a7a3a5c0597ccab79546250c1197609ee981fe324e
Allows calling UpdateLockPoints() with a (const) txiter. Note that this
was already possible for caller using mapTx.modify(txiter). The point
here is to not be accessing mapTx when doing so.
9b3da70bd0 [test] DisconnectedBlockTransactions::DynamicMemoryUsage (glozow)
b2d0447964 bugfix: correct DisconnectedBlockTransactions memory usage (stickies-v)
f4254e2098 assume duplicate transactions are not added to `iters_by_txid` (ismaelsadeeq)
29eb219c12 move only: move implementation code to disconnected_transactions.cpp (ismaelsadeeq)
81dfeddea7 refactor: update `MAX_DISCONNECTED_TX_POOL` from kb to bytes (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
This PR is a follow-up to fix review comments and a bugfix from #28385
The PR
- Updated `DisconnectedBlockTransactions`'s `MAX_DISCONNECTED_TX_POOL` from kb to bytes.
- Moved `DisconnectedBlockTransactions` implementation code to `kernel/disconnected_transactions.cpp`.
- `AddTransactionsFromBlock` now assume duplicate transactions are not passed by asserting after inserting each transaction to `iters_by_txid`.
- Included a Bug fix: In the current master we are underestimating the memory usage of `DisconnectedBlockTransactions`.
* When adding and subtracting `cachedInnerUsage` we call `RecursiveDynamicUsage` with `CTransaction` which invokes this [`RecursiveDynamicUsage(const CTransaction& tx)`](6e721c923c/src/core_memusage.h (L32)) version of `RecursiveDynamicUsage`, the output of that call only account for the memory usage of the inputs and outputs of the `CTransaction`, this omits the memory usage of the `CTransaction` object and the control block.
* This PR fixes this bug by calling `RecursiveDynamicUsage` with `CTransactionRef` when adding and subtracting `cachedInnerUsage` which invokes [`RecursiveDynamicUsage(const std::shared_ptr<X>& p)`](6e721c923c/src/core_memusage.h (L67)) version of `RecursiveDynamicUsage` the output of the calculation accounts for the` CTransaction` object, the control blocks, inputs and outputs memory usage.
* see [comment ](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28385#discussion_r1322948452)
- Added test for DisconnectedBlockTransactions memory limit.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
ACK 9b3da70bd0 - nice work!
BrandonOdiwuor:
re ACK 9b3da70bd0
glozow:
ACK 9b3da70bd0
Tree-SHA512: 69b9595d09f4d0209038f97081d790cea92ccf63efb94e9e372749979fcbe527f7f17a8e454720cedd12021be0c8e11cf99874625d3dafd9ec602b12dbeb4098
The legacy serialization was vulnerable to maleation and is fixed by
adopting the same serialization procedure as was already in use for
MuHash.
This also includes necessary test fixes where the hash_serialized2 was
hardcoded as well as correction of the regtest chainparams.
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Falbesoner <sebastian.falbesoner@gmail.com>
With `queuedTx` owning the `CTransactionRef` shared ptrs, they (and
the managed objects) are entirely allocated on the heap. In
`DisconnectedBlockTransactions::DynamicMemoryUsage`, we account for
the 2 pointers that make up the shared_ptr, but not for the managed
object (CTransaction) or the control block.
Prior to this commit, by calculating the `RecursiveDynamicUsage` on
a `CTransaction` whenever modifying `cachedInnerUsage`, we account
for the dynamic usage of the `CTransaction`, i.e. the `vins` and
`vouts` vectors, but we do not account for the `CTransaction`
object itself, nor for the `CTransactionRef` control block.
This means prior to this commit, `DynamicMemoryUsage` underestimates
dynamic memory usage by not including the `CTransaction` objects and
the shared ptr control blocks.
Fix this by calculating `RecursiveDynamicUsage` on the
`CTransactionRef` instead of the `CTransaction` whenever modifying
`cachedInnerUsage`.
In `AddTransactionsToBlock` description comment we have the asuumption
that callers will never pass multiple transactions with the same txid
We are asserting to assume that does not happen.
This allows us to reference assumeutxo configuration by blockhash as
well as height; this is helpful in future changes when we want to
reference assumeutxo configurations before the block index is loaded.
4313c77400 make DisconnectedBlockTransactions responsible for its own memory management (glozow)
cf5f1faa03 MOVEONLY: DisconnectedBlockTransactions to its own file (glozow)
2765d6f343 rewrite DisconnectedBlockTransactions as a list + map (glozow)
79ce9f0aa4 add std::list to memusage (glozow)
59a35a7398 [bench] DisconnectedBlockTransactions (glozow)
925bb723ca [refactor] batch-add transactions to DisconnectedBlockTransactions (glozow)
Pull request description:
Motivation
- I think it's preferable to use stdlib data structures instead of depending on boost if we can achieve the same thing.
- Also see #28335 for further context/motivation. This PR simplifies that one.
Things done in this PR:
- Add a bench for `DisconnectedBlockTransactions` where we reorg and the new chain has {100%, 90%, 10%} of the same transactions. AFAIU in practice, it's usually close to 100%.
- Rewrite `DisconnectedBlockTransactions` as a `std::list` + `unordered_map` instead of a boost multi index container.
- On my machine, the bench suggests the performance is very similar.
- Move `DisconnectedBlockTransactions` from txmempool.h to its own kernel/disconnected_transactions.h. This struct isn't used by txmempool and doesn't have much to do with txmempool. My guess is that it's been living there for convenience since the boost includes are there.
ACKs for top commit:
ismaelsadeeq:
Tested ACK 4313c77400
stickies-v:
ACK 4313c77400
TheCharlatan:
ACK 4313c77400
Tree-SHA512: 273c80866bf3acd39b2a039dc082b7719d2d82e0940e1eb6c402f1c0992e997256722b85c7e310c9811238a770cfbdeb122ea4babbc23835d17128f214a1ef9e
d506765199 [refactor] Remove compat.h from kernel headers (TheCharlatan)
36193af47c [refactor] Remove netaddress.h from kernel headers (TheCharlatan)
2b08c55f01 [refactor] Add CChainParams member to CConnman (TheCharlatan)
f0d1d8b35c [refactor] Add missing includes for next commit (TheCharlatan)
534b314a74 kernel: Move MessageStartChars to its own file (TheCharlatan)
9be330b654 [refactor] Define MessageStartChars as std::array (TheCharlatan)
37e2b01113 [refactor] Allow std::array<std::byte, N> in serialize.h (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This removes the non-consensus critical `protocol.h` and `netaddress.h` headers from the kernel headers. With this patch, they are no longer required to include in order to use the libbitcoinkernel library. This also allows for the removal of the `compat.h` header from the kernel headers.
As an added future benefit it also reduces the number of of kernel headers that include the platform specific `bitcoin-config.h`.
For those interested, the currently required kernel headers can be inspected visually with the [sourcetrail](https://github.com/CoatiSoftware/Sourcetrail) tool by looking at the required includes of `bitcoin-chainstate.cpp`.
---
This is part of the [libbitcoinkernel project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27587), namely its stage 1 step 3: Decouple most non-consensus headers from libbitcoinkernel.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK d506765
hebasto:
ACK d506765199.
ajtowns:
utACK d506765199
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK d506765199🍛
Tree-SHA512: 6f90ea510a302c2927e84d16900e89997c39b8ff3ce9d4effeb8a134bd29cc52bd9e81e51aaa11f7496bad00025b78a58b88c5a9e0bb3f4ebbe9a76309215fb7
