ScriptPubKeyMan is only using UnsetWalletFlagWithDB to unset the blank
wallet flag. Just make that it's own function and not expose the flag
writing directly.
This does not change behavior.
The default (i.e., generated by a compiler) copy constructor does the
same things.
Also this prevents -Wdeprecated-copy warning for implicitly declared
operator= in GCC 9.
b0c774b48a Add new mempool benchmarks for a complex pool (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
This PR is related to #17268.
It adds a mempool stress test which makes a really big complicated tx graph, and then, similar to mempool_eviction test, trims the size.
The test setup is to make 100 original transactions with Rand(10)+2 outputs each.
Then, 800 times:
we create a new transaction with Rand(10) + 1 parents that are randomly sampled from all existing transactions (with unspent outputs). From each such parent, we then select Rand(remaining outputs) +1 50% of the time, or 1 outputs 50% of the time.
Then, we trim the size to 3/4. Then we trim it to just a single transaction.
This creates, hopefully, a big bundle of transactions with lots of complex structure, that should really put a strain on the mempool graph algorithms.
This ends up testing both the descendant and ancestor tracking.
I don't love that the test is "unstable". That is, in order to compare this test to another, you really can't modify any of the internal state because it will have a different order of invocations of the deterministic randomness. However, it certainly suffices for comparing branches.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: cabe96b849b9885878e20eec558915e921d49e6ed1e4b011b22ca191b4c99aa28930a8b963784c9adf78cc8b034a655513f7a0da865e280a1214ae15ebb1d574
5710dadf9b test: fix script_p2sh_tests OP_PUSHBACK2/4 missing (kodslav)
Pull request description:
Cleans up #15140 which fixes commit 6b25f29a91 where opcodes were lost in translation.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK 5710dadf9b
Tree-SHA512: 3f7fbcaf0dd199626d9ec9fdf3c5b5c5c2a91c4cfe81fae5b1d5662a48e52cf4bd27c94f8f42ebdfe7a076c5d600ada5661a6902b03eb5dc3dc953f4524345ac
8734c856f8 Replace the LogPrint function with a macro (Jeffrey Czyz)
Pull request description:
Calling `LogPrint` with a category that is not enabled results in
evaluating the remaining function arguments, which may be arbitrarily
complex (and possibly expensive) expressions. Defining `LogPrint` as a
macro prevents this unnecessary expression evaluation.
This is a partial revert of #14209. The decision to revert is discussed
in #16688, which adds verbose logging for validation event notification.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK 8734c856f8
Tree-SHA512: 19e995eaef0ff008a9f8c1fd6f3882f1fbf6794dd7e2dcf5c68056be787eee198d2956037d4ffba2b01e7658b47eba276cd7132feede78832373b3304203961e
a8b82867d5 Fix incorrect help-debug for -checkpoints (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK a8b82867d5 for improving the `-prune` help text.
MarcoFalke:
ACK a8b82867d5
Tree-SHA512: 973fa97436be09a9939386dc00023420a7296a9e268356bf26aa06468f9f0d2c822205a4f1ce8f44a0562aa64ad90a43dec5697af656ef28ba6829e4e4360e94
9cae3d5e94 tests: Add fuzzer initialization (hold ECCVerifyHandle) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
The fuzzers `eval_script` and `script_flags` require holding `ECCVerifyHandle`.
This is a follow-up to #17235 which accidentally broke those two fuzzers.
Sorry about the temporary breakage my fuzzing friends: it took a while to fuzz before reaching these code paths. That's why this wasn't immediately caught. Sorry.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 67ebb155ba90894c07eac630e33f2f985c97bdf96dc751f312633414abeccdca20315d7d8f2ec4ee3ac810b666a1e44afb4ea8bc28165151cd51b623f816cac2
d314e8a818 refactor: Replace all uses of boost::optional with our own Optional type (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Replace all uses of boost::optional with our own Optional type. Luckily, there aren't so many.
After this:
- `boost::optional` is no longer used directly (only through `Optional` which is an alias for it)
- `boost/optional.hpp` is only included in one place
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK d314e8a818
practicalswift:
ACK d314e8a818 -- diff looks correct + satisfying to see incremental progress towards the goal of a Boost free future :)
jtimon:
ACK d314e8a818
fanquake:
ACK d314e8a818
Tree-SHA512: b43e0017af81b07b5851377cd09624f114510ac5b9018d037664b58ad0fc8e893e30946b61f8f5e21e39125925bf9998a81f2226b468aab2df653ee57ed3213d
Instead of keeping pindexBestHeader set to the best header we've
ever seen, reset it back to our validated tip if we find an ancestor
of it turns out to be invalid. While the name is now a bit confusing,
this matches much better with how it is used in practice, see below.
Further, this opens up more use-cases for it in the future, namely
aggressively searching for new peers in case we have discovered
(possibly via some covert channel) headers which we do not know to be
invalid, but which we cannot find block data for.
Places pindexBestHeader is used:
* Various GUI displays of the best header and getblockchaininfo["headers"],
I don't think changing this is bad, and if anything this is less confusing
in the presence of an invalid block.
* IsCurrentForFeeEstimation(): If anything I think ensuring pindexBestHeader
isn't some crazy invalid chain is better than the alternative, even in the
case where you are rejecting the current chain due to hardware error (since
hopefully in that case you won't get any new blocks anyway).
* ConnectBlock assumevalid checks: We use pindexBestHeader to check that the
block we're connecting leads to something with nMinimumChainWork (preventing
a user-set assumevalid from having bogus work) and that the block we're
connecting leads to pindexBestHeader (I'm not too worried about this one -
it's nice to "disable" assumevalid if we have a long invalid headers chain,
but I don't see it as a critical protection).
* BlockRequestAllowed() uses pindexBestHeader as its target to ensure the
requested block is within a month of the "current chain". I don't think this
is a meaningful difference, if we're rejecting the current tip we're
trivially fingerprintable anyway, and if the chain really does have a bunch
of invalid crap near the tip, using the best not-invalid header is likely a
better criteria.
* ProcessGetBlockData uses pindexBestHeader as the "current chain" definition
of whether a block request is "historical" for the purpose of bandwidth
limiting. Similarly, I don't see why this is a meaningful change.
* We use pindexBestHeader for requesting missing headers on receipt of a
headers/compact block message or block inv as well as for initial getheaders.
I think this is definitely wrong, using the best not-invalid header for such
requests is much better.
* We use pindexBestHeader to define the "current chain" for deciding when
we're close to done with initial headers sync. I don't think this is a
meaningful change.
* We use pindexBestHeader to decide if initial headers sync has timed out. If
we're rejecting the chain due to hardware error this may result in
additional cases where we ban a peer, but this is already true, so I think
its fine.
3004d5a12d [validation] Remove fMissingInputs from AcceptToMemoryPool() (John Newbery)
c428622a5b [validation] Remove unused first_invalid parameter from ProcessNewBlockHeaders() (John Newbery)
7204c6434b [validation] Remove useless ret parameter from Invalid() (John Newbery)
1a37de4b31 [validation] Remove error() calls from Invalid() calls (John Newbery)
067981e492 [validation] Tidy Up ValidationResult class (John Newbery)
a27a2957ed [validation] Add CValidationState subclasses (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Carries out some remaining tidy-ups remaining after PR 15141:
- split ValidationState into TxValidationState and BlockValidationState (commit from ajtowns)
- various minor code style tidy-ups to the ValidationState class
- remove the useless `ret` parameter from `ValidationState::Invalid()`
- remove the now unused `first_invalid` parameter from `ProcessNewBlockHeaders()`
- remove the `fMissingInputs` parameter from `AcceptToMemoryPool()`, and deal with missing inputs the same way as other errors by using the `TxValidationState` object.
Tip for reviewers (thanks ryanofsky!): The first commit ("[validation] Add CValidationState subclasses" ) is huge and can be easier to start reviewing if you revert the rote, mechanical changes:
Substitute the commit hash of commit "[validation] Add CValidationState subclasses" for <CommitHash> in the commands below.
```sh
git checkout <CommitHash>
git grep -l ValidationState | xargs sed -i 's/BlockValidationState\|TxValidationState/CValidationState/g'
git grep -l ValidationResult | xargs sed -i 's/BlockValidationResult\|TxValidationResult/ValidationInvalidReason/g'
git grep -l MaybePunish | xargs sed -i 's/MaybePunishNode\(ForBlock\|ForTx\)/MaybePunishNode/g'
git diff HEAD^
```
After that it's possible to easily see the mechanical changes with:
```sh
git log -p -n1 -U0 --word-diff-regex=. <CommitHash>
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 3004d5a12d
amitiuttarwar:
code review ACK 3004d5a12d. Also built & ran tests locally.
fjahr:
Code review ACK 3004d5a12d . Only nit style change and pure virtual destructor added since my last review.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 3004d5a12d. Just whitespace change and pure virtual destructor added since last review.
Tree-SHA512: 511de1fb380a18bec1944ea82b513b6192df632ee08bb16344a2df3c40811a88f3872f04df24bc93a41643c96c48f376a04551840fd804a961490d6c702c3d36
fa144e6fde rpc: Add generatetodescriptor (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The existing `generatetoaddress` RPC can only generate to scriptPubKeys that can be represented by an address. However, raw scripts (such as `OP_TRUE`) or P2PK can not be represented by an address, which complicates testing.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa144e6fde
Tree-SHA512: aee934ab7e33f07c81f3b4c8ec23e7b6ddf63a1f4b86051af0bd76b75d8da1f51627cc682e5c6e42582340ca576bbf8ff724bdd43f87128ccecfa91e52d30ae7
After this:
- `boost::optional` is no longer used directly (only through `Optional`
which is an alias for it)
- `boost/optional.hpp` is only included in one place
31879345ee cli: Add "headers" and "verificationprogress" to -getinfo (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
These values are useful to know the current progress of initial sync, or of catching up, which is arguably the use of a quick `-getinfo` command.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
unsigned ACK 31879345ee
jonasschnelli:
utACK 31879345ee
jonatack:
Tested ACK 31879345ee on Debian 4.19.37-5+deb10u2 (2019-08-08) x86_64 GNU/Linux
Tree-SHA512: 185180ab426b4db5d99eb208ee88d1606f585361875ba3a92b6c28a74fe181d72ed710c8859b969ba49b1ca7d2385695932b79ff621c7a2a7cedd0df717a99ed
362ded410b Avoid using g_rpc_node global in wallet code (Russell Yanofsky)
8922d7f6b7 scripted-diff: Remove g_connman, g_banman globals (Russell Yanofsky)
e6f4f895d5 Pass NodeContext, ConnMan, BanMan references more places (Russell Yanofsky)
4d5448c76b MOVEONLY: Move NodeContext struct to node/context.h (Russell Yanofsky)
301bd41a2e scripted-diff: Rename InitInterfaces to NodeContext (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This change is mainly a naming / organization change intended to simplify #10102. It:
- Renames struct InitInterfaces to struct NodeContext and moves it from
src/init.h to src/node/context.h. This is a cosmetic change intended to make
the point of the struct more obvious.
- Gets rid of BanMan and ConnMan globals making them NodeContext members
instead. Getting rid of these globals has been talked about in past as a way
to implement testing and simulations. Making them NodeContext members is a
way of keeping them accessible without the globals.
- Splits g_rpc_interfaces global into g_rpc_node and g_rpc_chain globals. This
better separates node and wallet rpc methods. Node RPC methods should have
access NodeContext, while wallet RPC methods should only have indirect access
to node functionality via interfaces::Chain.
- Adds NodeContext& references to interfaces::Chain class and the
interfaces::MakeChain() function. This is needed to access ConnMan and BanMan
instances without the globals.
- Gets rid of redundant Node and Chain instances in Qt tests. This is
needed due to the previous MakeChain change, and also makes test setup a
little more straightforward. More cleanup could be done in the future, but it
will require deduplication of bitcoind, bitcoin-qt, and TestingSetup init
code.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 362ded410b
Tree-SHA512: 9ae6ff1e33423291d1e52056bac95e0874538390892a6e83c4c115b3c73155a8827c0191b46eb3d14e3b3f6c23ccb08095490880fbc3188026319c71739f7db2
37b8475dcf Chainparams: Use name constants in chainparams initialization (Jorge Timón)
Pull request description:
I thought this wouldn't work for some reason, but it seems it does.
Just a little bit more consistency. I'm still not able to use them in qt/networkstyle.cpp though, not sure why.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 37b8475dcf
laanwj:
ACK 37b8475dcf
hebasto:
ACK 37b8475dcf, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
fjahr:
ACK 37b8475
Tree-SHA512: d9fa5df5650e10c645ac1f3afe831674a47f35d4a649e18a3d2aee1d04b08e6896aff6f1bbed0630d28775c51f989f9daaa9e405c9f3d7dca30e639a6f9008f0
f3b51eb935 Fix occurences of c_str() used with size() to data() (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Using `data()` better communicates the intent here.
~~Also, depending on how `c_str()` is implemented, this fixes undefined behavior: The part of the string after the first NULL character might have undefined contents (or even be inaccessible, worst case).~~ Apparently [this is no longer an issue with C++11](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17281#discussion_r339742128).
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK f3b51eb
practicalswift:
ACK f3b51eb935 -- diff looks correct, `data()` more idiomatic
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK f3b51eb935. Most of these calls (including one in crypter.cpp) are passing text strings, not binary strings likely to contain `\0` and were probably safe before, but much better to avoid the possibility of bugs like this.
Tree-SHA512: 842e1bdd37efc4ece2ecb87ca34962aafef0a192180051def630607e349dc9c8b4e562481fff3de474515f493b4ee3ea53b00269a801a66e625326a38dfce5b8
c1c6c410a6 test: add reason checks for non-standard txs in test_IsStandard (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
While taking a look at #17272 I noticed that for some reason the unit test `test_IsStandard` (which was not adapted to the policy change in the referenced PR commits) didn't fail as expected:
6a97e8a060/src/test/transaction_tests.cpp (L758-L762)
It turned out that `IsStandardTx()` returned `"dust"` as rejection reason (instead of the expected `"multi-op-return"`), leading to the conclusion that 5fe6f052bd erroneously performs the `IsDust()` check also for TX_NULL_DATA transactions. To avoid cases like this in the future, this PR makes the unit test `test_IsStandard` more strict by also checking for the concrete reason after each occurence of `IsStandardTx()` returning false.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK c1c6c410a6
Tree-SHA512: c7419884cc52977c73f8f8c476eaebed80ba7bda4d03509d3f46dd977be911389f7b53daefa5ef31d2f7df9402243152e01e83f1b8a9fb300c19d1a0f69a89a9
ValidationState::Invalid() takes a parameter `ret` which is returned to
the caller. All call sites set this to false. Remove the `ret` parameter
and just return false always.
This is in preparation for the next commit, which removes the useless
`ret` parameter from ValidationState::Invalid().
error() is simply a convenience wrapper that calls LogPrintf and returns
false. Call LogPrintf explicitly and substitute the error() call for a
false bool literal.
