df536883d2 chain: Remove UB CChain comparison (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Comparing two empty `CChain`s is currently undefined behaviour, and resulted in false assertion failures when comparing identical empty `CChain`s in local testing.
Let's just remove this comparison operator since it doesn't seem to be used anywhere.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK df536883d2 -- patch is guaranteed to be correct :)
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK df536883d2
Tree-SHA512: db10bac364fc965b56abf7a5bac48018786b14806ffe107e3e8eb24d5004a29331f3387dfe3409a3452a6750d3329e3f354265d787ebb3abfccabe77b28a54d5
cc26fab48d tests: Add fuzzing harness for CNode (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add fuzzing harness for `CNode`.
See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets).
Happy fuzzing :)
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: e6330e5de5b2eb44d3bd91a885e69ebb625bfd1cb2499338aeb3997ff0268848434e651126fe68a8cadd7235c391e61a40d6408ee26e457faf73572e0c375f6b
b6dcc6d741 gui: Clarify block height label (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Prefer "block height" instead of "number of blocks".
This was done while testing https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16981.
ACKs for top commit:
michaelfolkson:
ACK b6dcc6d741. I don't think there are any other obvious examples in the GUI where "block height" should replace "number of blocks" except for translations.
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK b6dcc6d741
Tree-SHA512: ec3b48c1af5d613ed657ad51f2caddea774376736ecc02343d54518986e35ec37f1745b059814b5be92b5e5c2bb2970d17159b24c6e88b9316803d4de5327c31
a99a3c0bd6 rpc: Validate provided keys for query_options parameter in listunspent (pasta)
Pull request description:
At Dash, one of our developers was working with the `listunspent` RPC command, but instead of saying "minimumAmount" he said "minimmumAmount" as such the RPC wasn't working as expected.
In https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/3507 we implemented a check so that `listunspent` returns an error if an unrecognized option is given. I figured I might as well adapt the code and throw up a PR here.
Cheers!
ACKs for top commit:
adaminsky:
ACK `a99a3c0bd`
meshcollider:
Seems fine to me. utACK a99a3c0bd6
Tree-SHA512: 9fccf14979849879a51b352afa3e1932ce4a6cfc2ee97b8d405ec6e65673fe94e302795e3ec0b440e6d252f13acda620e1f6a0e86c3fa918883c3fb4600a372c
This is needed to allow bitcoin-gui to connect to existing node process with
-ipcconnect instead of spawning a new process. It's possible to spawn a new
bitcoin-node process without knowing the current data dir or network, but
connecting to an existing bitcoin-node requires knowing the datadir and network
first.
No change in behavior. Replacing references with pointers allows Node interface
creation to be delayed until later during gui startup next commit to support
implementing -ipcconnect option
Change gui code to use gArgs, Params() functions directly instead of going
through interfaces::Node.
Remotely accessing bitcoin-node ArgsManager from bitcoin-gui works fine in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10102, when bitcoin-gui spawns a new
bitcoin-node process and controls its startup, but for bitcoin-gui to support
-ipcconnect option in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19461 and connect
to an existing bitcoin-node process, it needs ability to parse arguments itself
before connecting out.
This change also simplifies https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10102 a
bit, by making the bitcoin-gui -> bitcoin-node startup sequence more similar to
the bitcoin-node -> bitcoin-wallet startup sequence where the parent process
parses arguments and passes them to the child process instead of the parent
process using the child process to parse arguments.
e2aa1a585a util: make EncodeBase64 consume Spans (Sebastian Falbesoner)
2bc207190e util: make EncodeBase32 consume Spans (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
To simplify the interface of the Base32/Base64 encoding functions for raw data, this PR changes them from taking two arguments (pointer and length) to just one Span. Most calls to `EncodeBase64` pass data from `CDataStream` instances, which unfortunately internally work with `char*` pointers rather than `unsigned char*`, but thanks to the recently introduced `MakeUCharSpan` helper, converting them is quite easy.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK e2aa1a585a🐮
vasild:
ACK e2aa1a585
Tree-SHA512: 43bd3bd2ee8e3be2474db0a81dae9d9e88fac2464b96d1b042147106ed7433799dcba3000c69990511ecfc697b0c7306ce85f2ecb2293e2e44fd356c9694b150
fa9d5902f7 scripted-diff: gArgs -> args (MarcoFalke)
fa33bc2dab init: Capture copy of blocknotify setting for BlockNotifyCallback (MarcoFalke)
fa40017706 init: Pass reference to ArgsManager around instead of relying on global (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The gArgs global has several issues:
* gArgs is used by each process (bitcoind, bitcoin-qt, bitcoin-wallet, bitcoin-cli, bitcoin-tx, ...), but it is hard to determine which arguments are actually used by each process. For example arguments that have never been registered, but are still used, will always return the fallback value.
* Tests may run several sub-tests, which need different settings. So globals will have to be overwritten, but that is fragile on its own: e.g. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19704#issuecomment-678259092 or #19511
The goal is to remove gArgs, but as a first step in that direction this pull will change gArgs in init to use a passed-in reference instead.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa9d5902f7. Looks good. Nice day to remove some globals, and add some lambdas 👍
fanquake:
ACK fa9d5902f7 - I'm not as familiar with the settings & argument handling code, but this make sense, and is a step in the right direction towards a reduction in the usage of globals. Not a huge fan of the clang-formatting in the scripted diff.
jonasschnelli:
Concept ACK fa9d5902f7
Tree-SHA512: ed00db5f826566c7e3b4d0b3d2ee0fc1a49a6e748e04e5c93bdd694ac7da5598749e73937047d5fce86150d764a067d2ca344ba4ae3eb2704cc5c4fa0d20940f
fad84b7e14 test: Activate segwit in TestChain100Setup (MarcoFalke)
fa11ff2980 test: Pass empty tx pool to block assembler (MarcoFalke)
fa96574b0d test: Move doxygen comment to header (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This fixes not only a TODO in the code, but also prevents a never ending source of uninitialized reads. E.g.
* #18376
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19704#issuecomment-678259092
* ...
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK fad84b7e14
Tree-SHA512: 64cf16a59656d49e022b603f3b06441ceae35a33a4253b4382bc8a89a56e08ad5412c8fa734d0fc7b58586f40ea6d57b348a3b4838bc6890a41ae2ec3902e378
102867c587 net: change CNetAddr::ip to have flexible size (Vasil Dimov)
1ea57ad674 net: don't accept non-left-contiguous netmasks (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
(chopped off from #19031 to ease review)
Before this change `CNetAddr::ip` was a fixed-size array of 16 bytes,
not being able to store larger addresses (e.g. TORv3) and encoded
smaller ones as 16-byte IPv6 addresses.
Change its type to `prevector`, so that it can hold larger addresses and
do not disguise non-IPv6 addresses as IPv6. So the IPv4 address
`1.2.3.4` is now encoded as `01020304` instead of
`00000000000000000000FFFF01020304`.
Rename `CNetAddr::ip` to `CNetAddr::m_addr` because it is not an "IP" or
"IP address" (TOR addresses are not IP addresses).
In order to preserve backward compatibility with serialization (where
e.g. `1.2.3.4` is serialized as `00000000000000000000FFFF01020304`)
introduce `CNetAddr` dedicated legacy serialize/unserialize methods.
Adjust `CSubNet` accordingly. Still use `CSubNet::netmask[]` of fixed 16
bytes, but use the first 4 for IPv4 (not the last 4). Do not accept
invalid netmasks that have 0-bits followed by 1-bits and only allow
subnetting for IPv4 and IPv6.
Co-authored-by: Carl Dong <contact@carldong.me>
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 102867c587
MarcoFalke:
Concept ACK 102867c587
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 102867c587. Just many suggested updates since last review. Thanks for following up on everything!
jonatack:
re-ACK 102867c587 diff review, code review, build/tests/running bitcoind with ipv4/ipv6/onion peers
kallewoof:
ACK 102867c587
Tree-SHA512: d60bf716cecf8d3e8146d2f90f897ebe956befb16f711a24cfe680024c5afc758fb9e4a0a22066b42f7630d52cf916318bedbcbc069ae07092d5250a11e8f762
9ab4cafabd Refactor Get{Prevout,Sequence,Outputs}Hash to Get{Prevouts,Sequences,Outputs}SHA256. (Jeremy Rubin)
6510d0ff41 Add SHA256Uint256 helper functions (Jeremy Rubin)
b475d7d0fa Add single sha256 call to CHashWriter (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
Opened as an alternative to #18071 to be more similar to #17977.
I'm fine with either, deferring to others.
cc jnewbery Sjors
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 9ab4cafabd
jonatack:
Tested ACK 9ab4caf
fjahr:
tested ACK 9ab4cafabd
instagibbs:
reACK 9ab4cafabd
Tree-SHA512: 93a7a47697f1657f027b18407bdcce16963f6b23d12372e7ac8fd4ee96769b3e2639369f9956fee669cc881b6338641cddfeeef1516c7104cb50ef4b880bb0a7
1ccb9f30c0 Move Win32 defines to configure.ac to ensure they are globally defined (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
#9245 no longer needs this, since the main `_WIN32_WINNT` got bumped by something else.
So rather than just lose it, might as well get it merged in independently.
I'm not aware of any practical effects, but it seems safer to use the same API versions everywhere.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 1ccb9f30c0 - checked that the binaries produced are the same.
Tree-SHA512: 273e9186579197be01b443b6968e26b9a8031d356fabc5b73aa967fcdb837df195b7ce0fc4e4529c85d9b86da6f2d7ff1bf56a3ff0cbbcd8cee8a9c2bf70a244
Before this change `CNetAddr::ip` was a fixed-size array of 16 bytes,
not being able to store larger addresses (e.g. TORv3) and encoded
smaller ones as 16-byte IPv6 addresses.
Change its type to `prevector`, so that it can hold larger addresses and
do not disguise non-IPv6 addresses as IPv6. So the IPv4 address
`1.2.3.4` is now encoded as `01020304` instead of
`00000000000000000000FFFF01020304`.
Rename `CNetAddr::ip` to `CNetAddr::m_addr` because it is not an "IP" or
"IP address" (TOR addresses are not IP addresses).
In order to preserve backward compatibility with serialization (where
e.g. `1.2.3.4` is serialized as `00000000000000000000FFFF01020304`)
introduce `CNetAddr` dedicated legacy serialize/unserialize methods.
Adjust `CSubNet` accordingly. Still use `CSubNet::netmask[]` of fixed 16
bytes, but use the first 4 for IPv4 (not the last 4). Only allow
subnetting for IPv4 and IPv6.
Co-authored-by: Carl Dong <contact@carldong.me>
A netmask that contains 1-bits after 0-bits (the 1-bits are not
contiguous on the left side) is invalid [1] [2].
The code before this PR used to parse and accept such
non-left-contiguous netmasks. However, a coming change that will alter
`CNetAddr::ip` to have flexible size would make juggling with such
netmasks more difficult, thus drop support for those.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classless_Inter-Domain_Routing#Subnet_masks
[2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4632#section-5.1
5da96210fc doc: release note for getpeerinfo last_block/last_transaction (Jon Atack)
cfef5a2c98 test: rpc_net.py logging and test naming improvements (Jon Atack)
21c57bacda test: getpeerinfo last_block and last_transaction tests (Jon Atack)
8a560a7d57 rpc: expose nLastBlockTime/TXTime as getpeerinfo last_block/transaction (Jon Atack)
02fbe3ae0b net: add nLastBlockTime/TXTime to CNodeStats, CNode::copyStats (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR adds inbound peer eviction criteria `nLastBlockTime` and `nLastTXTime` to `CNodeStats` and `CNode::copyStats`, which then allows exposing them in the next commit as `last_transaction` and `last_block` Unix Epoch Time fields in RPC `getpeerinfo`.
This may be useful for writing missing eviction tests. I'd also like to add `lasttx` and `lastblk` columns to the `-netinfo` dashboard as described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19643#issuecomment-671093420.
Relevant discussion at the p2p irc meeting http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2020-08-11.html#l-549:
```text
<jonatack> i was specifically trying to observe and figure out how to test https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19500
<jonatack> which made me realise that i didn't know what was going on with my peer conns in enough detail
<jonatack> i'm running bitcoin locally with nLastBlockTime and nLastTXTime added to getpeerinfo for my peer connections dashboard
<jonatack> sipa: is there a good reason why that (eviction criteria) data is not exposed through getpeerinfo currently?
<sipa> jonatack: nope; i suspect just nobody ever added it
<jonatack> sipa: thanks. will propose.
```
The last commit is optional, but I think it would be good to have logging in `rpc_net.py`.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 5da96210fc
theStack:
Code Review ACK 5da96210fc
darosior:
ACK 5da96210fc
Tree-SHA512: 2db164bc979c014837a676e890869a128beb7cf40114853239e7280f57e768bcb43bff6c1ea76a61556212135281863b5290b50ff9d24fce16c5b89b55d4cd70
daed542a12 [net_processing] Move ProcessMessage to PeerLogicValidation (John Newbery)
c556770b5e [net_processing] Change PeerLogicValidation to hold a connman reference (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Rather than ProcessMessage() being a static function in net_processing.cpp, make it a private member function of PeerLogicValidation. This is the start of moving static functions and global variables into PeerLogicValidation to make it better encapsulated.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK daed542a12 code review and debug tested
promag:
Code review ACK daed542a12.
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK daed542a12, only change is removing second commit 🎴
theStack:
Code Review ACK daed542a12
Tree-SHA512: ddebf410d114d9ad5a9e536950018ff333a347c035d74fcc101fb4a3f20a281782c7eac2b7d1bd1c8f6bc7e59f5b5630fb52c2e1b4c32df454fa584673bd021e
8ed2f1ed78 Remove unused includes (Marcin Jachymiak)
cf095a53fc Move comment about BaseIndex::DB from TxIndex::DB (Marcin Jachymiak)
Pull request description:
Moves a comment about the `BaseIndex::DB` from the `TxIndex::DB` into the correct place. Originally part of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14053.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 8ed2f1ed78
Tree-SHA512: cb4e2b916c7ab996961cc2e1d910bc4b8a1700eb32b70fc1657ca720117a7a84f7337fe5e4fb30e047aa92c31eaa976eaaa5cb8f861877f2ff6f4a59bb94f4e9
124e1ee134 doc: Add release notes for getindexinfo RPC (Fabian Jahr)
c447b09458 test: Add tests for getindexinfo RPC (Fabian Jahr)
667bc7a7f7 rpc: Add getindexinfo RPC (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
As I was playing with indices a I was missing an RPC that gives information about the active indices in the node. I think this can be helpful for many users, especially since there are some new index candidates coming up (#14053, #18000) that can give a quick overview without the user having to parse the logs.
Feature summary:
- Adds new RPC `listindices` (placed in Util section)
- That RPC only lists the actively running indices
- For each index it gives the name, whether it is synced and up to which block height it is synced
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Re-ACK 124e1ee134
jonatack:
Code review re-ACK 124e1ee per `git range-diff a57af89 47a5372 124e1ee` no change since my last re-ACK, rebase only
Tree-SHA512: 3b7174c87951e6457fef099f530337803906baf32fb64261410b8def2c0917853d6a1bf3059cd590b1cc1523608f8916dafb327a431d27ecbf8d7454406b5b35
71e0f07e9c util: remove unused c-string variant of atoi64() (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This is another micro-PR "removing old cruft with potentially sharp edges" (quote by practicalswift, see #19739). Gets rid of the c-string variant of the function `atoi64()`, which is only used in fuzzers and on one place with `wallet/wallet.h` (where it is originally a `std::string` anyways and uses `.c_str()` -- this method call can simply be removed.)
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 71e0f07e9c -- diff looks correct
laanwj:
ACK 71e0f07e9c
Tree-SHA512: 4d1d28e2f5274fdbe0652e7a0f83dd416f4d19c1e1a49979927960a3ad40b0990eeaa4374656bf2c6998a965a14d62c1bc78303b7d583d3307c17828030a8e3b
356988e200 util: make EncodeBase58Check consume Spans (Sebastian Falbesoner)
f0fce0675d util: make EncodeBase58 consume Spans (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR improves the interfaces for the functions `EncodeBase58{Check}` by using Spans, in a similar fashion to e.g. PRs #19660, #19687. Note that on the master branch there are currently two versions of `EncodeBase58`: one that takes two pointers (marking begin and end) and another one that takes a `std::vector<unsigned char>` const-ref. The PR branch only leaves one generic Span-interface, both simplifying the interface and allowing more generic containers to be passed. The same is done for `EncodeBase58Check`, where only one interface existed but it's more generic now (e.g. a std::array can be directly passed, as done in the benchmarks).
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 356988e200
Tree-SHA512: 47cfccdd7f3a2d4694bb8785e6e5fd756daee04ce1652ee59a7822e7e833b4a441ae9362b9bd67ea020d2b5b7d927629c9addb6abaa9881d8564fd3b1257f512
4792cad88c doc: comment out and add annotation to unused MSG_FILTERED_WITNESS_BLOCK (Adam Jonas)
Pull request description:
Commenting out and adding a note to unused `MSG_FILTERED_WITNESS_BLOCK` [defined in BIP144](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0144.mediawiki#relay).
There was an attempt to make use of this in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10350, but it was closed due to lack of support. (h/t sdaftuar for pointing to the PR and jnewbery for the idea)
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Obvious ACK 4792cad88c
theStack:
ACK 4792cad88c📜
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 4792cad88c good to keep it around in a comment to avoid accidental future re-assignment
practicalswift:
ACK 4792cad88c
Tree-SHA512: 22327ddded643ae50fdb529e4529a9b464f74e90620d0d2079a11070eaa8afe8363f6e14cca52f3bec2c9f87ee13e318edc6c5193761c94b8ae77be353a8da1f
fa55c1d5fd build: Add Werror=range-loop-analysis (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The warning is implicitly enabled for Bitcoin Core. Also explicitly since commit d92204c900.
To avoid "fix range loop" follow-up refactors, we have two options:
* Disable the warning, so that issues never appear
* Enable it as an error, so that issues are either caught locally or by ci
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa55c1d5fd
practicalswift:
ACK fa55c1d5fd -- pre-review fix-up is better than post-review fix-up
hebasto:
re-ACK fa55c1d5fd
Tree-SHA512: 019aa133f254af8882c1d5d10c420d9882305db0fc2aa9dad7d285168e2556306c3eedcc03bd30e63f11eae4cc82b648d83fb6e9179d6a6364651fb602d70134
7668db3b08 Move only: Move CDiskTxPos to its own file (Marcin Jachymiak)
Pull request description:
Moves `CDiskTxPos` it its own file so it can be used without the `txindex.h` include elsewhere. Originally part of #14053.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 7668db3b08
promag:
ACK 7668db3b08.
Tree-SHA512: b108e980ad04e43d1323410c3683a82bed70aee7795f5d8a2afbaf32a07ba598571f00b047bdde15048124b17178bcbd10654c48461beac988e9643cb2df664c
7f13dfb587 test: test the implicit avoid partial spends functionality (Karl-Johan Alm)
b82067bf69 wallet: try -avoidpartialspends mode and use its result if fees are below threshold (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
The `-avoidpartialspends` feature is normally disabled, as it may affect the optimal fee for payments. This PR introduces a new parameter `-maxapsfee` (max avoid partial spends fee) which acts on the following values:
* -1: disable partial spend avoidance completely (do not even try it)
* 0: only do partial spend avoidance if fees are the same or better as the regular coin selection
* 1..∞: use APS variant if the absolute fee difference is less than or equal to the max APS fee
For values other than -1, the code will now try partial spend avoidance once, and if that gives a value within the accepted range, it will use that.
Example: -maxapsfee=0.00001000 means the wallet will do regular coin select, APS coin select, and then pick AKS iff the absolute fee difference is <= 1000 satoshi.
Edit: updated this to reflect the fact we are now using a max fee.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tested ACK 7f13dfb587
achow101:
ACK 7f13dfb587
jonatack:
ACK 7f13dfb58, code review, debug build, verified the test fails with `AssertionError: not(2 == 1)` for the number of vouts when `-maxapsfee=0.0001` is changed to 0, and verified the new logging with an added assertion.
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 7f13dfb587
Tree-SHA512: 475929df57f6191bb4e36bfbcad5a280a64bb0ecd8767b76cb2e44e2301235d0eb294a3f2fac5bbf15d35d7ecfba47acb2285feadb883c9ce31c08377e3afb3c
