Rewrite OutputGroups so that the logic is easier to follow and
understand.
There is a slight behavior change as OutputGroups will be grouped by
scriptPubKey rather than CTxDestination as before. This should have no
effect on users as all addresses are a CTxDestination. However by using
scriptPubKeys, we can correctly group outputs which fall into the
NoDestination case. But we also shouldn't have any NoDestination
outputs.
9b74461fa2 refactor: Assert before dereference in CWallet::GetDatabase (João Barbosa)
021feb3187 refactor: Drop redudant CWallet::GetDBHandle (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Code Review ACK 9b74461fa2
meshcollider:
utACK 9b74461fa2
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9b74461fa2. Changes since last review: rebasing due to conflict, dropping wallet path commit c6a5cd7a64c78b162f545a3467d0fea7dcaadfcc as suggested in discussion, making GetDatabase() const in the earlier commit. Giving more descriptive title like
Tree-SHA512: 68cf3b5e9fe0acb3a5cd081086629989f213f1904cc344e5775767b56759a7d905b1e1c303afbe40f172ff81bf07f3719b59d8f6ec2de3fdd53cd0e2d220fb25
Our max weight check in CreateTransaction only worked if the transaction
was fully signed. However if we are funding a transaction, it is
possible that the tx weight will be too large for a standard tx. In that
case, we should also fail. So we use the tx weight returned by
CalculateMaximumSignedTxSize and check against the limit for those
transactions.
3eb6f8b2e6 wallet (not for backport): improve upgradewallet error messages (Jon Atack)
ca8cd893bb wallet: fix and improve upgradewallet error responses (Jon Atack)
99d56e3571 wallet: fix and improve upgradewallet result responses (Jon Atack)
2498b04ce8 Don't upgrade to HD split if it is already supported (Andrew Chow)
c46c18b788 wallet: refactor GetClosestWalletFeature() (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This follows up on #18836 and #20282 to fix and improve the as-yet unreleased `upgradewallet` feature and also implement review follow-up in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18836#discussion_r519328607.
This PR fixes 4 upgradewallet issues:
- this bug: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20403#discussion_r526063920
- it returns nothing in the absence of an RPC error, which isn't reassuring for users
- it returns the same thing both in the case of a successful upgrade and when no upgrade took place
- the error message object is currently dead code
This PR fixes the above and provides:
...user feedback to not silently return without upgrading
```
{
"wallet_name": "disable private keys",
"previous_version": 169900,
"current_version": 169900,
"result": "Already at latest version. Wallet version unchanged."
}
```
...better feedback after successfully upgrading
```
{
"wallet_name": "watch-only",
"previous_version": 159900,
"current_version": 169900,
"result": "Wallet upgraded successfully from version 159900 to version 169900."
}
```
...helpful error responses
```
{
"wallet_name": "blank",
"previous_version": 169900,
"current_version": 169900,
"error": "Cannot downgrade wallet from version 169900 to version 159900. Wallet version unchanged."
}
{
"wallet_name": "blank",
"previous_version": 130000,
"current_version": 130000,
"error": "Cannot upgrade a non HD split wallet from version 130000 to version 169899 without upgrading to support pre-split keypool. Please use version 169900 or no version specified."
}
```
updated help:
```
upgradewallet ( version )
Upgrade the wallet. Upgrades to the latest version if no version number is specified.
New keys may be generated and a new wallet backup will need to be made.
Arguments:
1. version (numeric, optional, default=169900) The version number to upgrade to. Default is the latest wallet version.
Result:
{ (json object)
"wallet_name" : "str", (string) Name of wallet this operation was performed on
"previous_version" : n, (numeric) Version of wallet before this operation
"current_version" : n, (numeric) Version of wallet after this operation
"result" : "str", (string, optional) Description of result, if no error
"error" : "str" (string, optional) Error message (if there is one)
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 3eb6f8b
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 3eb6f8b2e6 🛡
Tree-SHA512: b767314069e26b5933b123acfea6aa40708507f504bdb22884da020a4ca1332af38a7072b061e36281533af9f4e236d94d3c129daf6fe5b55241127537038eed
05e82d86b0 wallet: override minfee checks (fOverrideFeeRate) for fee_rate (Jon Atack)
9a670b4f07 wallet: update sendtoaddress, send RPC examples with fee_rate (Jon Atack)
be481b72e2 wallet: use MIN_RELAY_TX_FEE in bumpfee help (Jon Atack)
449b730579 wallet: provide valid values if invalid estimate mode passed (Jon Atack)
6da3afbaee wallet: update remaining rpcwallet fee rate units to BTC/kvB (Jon Atack)
173b5b5fe0 wallet: update fee rate units, use sat/vB for fee_rate error messages (Jon Atack)
7f9835a05a wallet: remove fee rates from conf_target helps (Jon Atack)
b7994c01e9 wallet: add fee_rate unit warnings to bumpfee (Jon Atack)
410e471fa4 wallet: remove redundant bumpfee fee_rate checks (Jon Atack)
a0d4957473 wallet: introduce fee_rate (sat/vB) param/option (Jon Atack)
e21212f01b wallet: remove unneeded WALLET_BTC_KB_TO_SAT_B constant (Jon Atack)
6112cf20d4 wallet: add CFeeRate ctor doxygen documentation (Jon Atack)
3f72791613 wallet: fix bug in RPC send options (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR builds on #11413 and #20220 to address #19543.
- replace overloading the conf_target and estimate_mode params with `fee_rate` in sat/vB in the sendtoaddress, sendmany, send, fundrawtransaction, walletcreatefundedpsbt, and bumpfee RPCs
- allow non-actionable conf_target value of `0` and estimate_mode value of `""` to be passed to use `fee_rate` as a positional argument, in addition to as a named argument
- fix a bug in the experimental send RPC described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20220#discussion_r513789526 where args were not being passed correctly into the options values
- update the feerate error message units for these RPCs from BTC/kB to sat/vB
- update the test coverage, help docs, doxygen docs, and some of the RPC examples
- other changes to address the excellent review feedback
See this wallet meeting log for more context: http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2020-11-06.html#l-309
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 05e82d8
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 05e82d86b0 did not test and found a few style nits, which can be fixed later 🍯
Xekyo:
tACK 05e82d86b0
Sjors:
utACK 05e82d86b0
Tree-SHA512: a4ee5f184ada53f1840b2923d25873bda88c5a2ae48e67eeea2417a0b35154798cfdb3c147b05dd56bd6608a784e1b91623bb985ee2ab9ef2baaec22206d0a9c
5f9c0b6360 wallet: Remove -upgradewallet from dummywallet (MarcoFalke)
a314271f08 test: Remove unused wallet.dat (MarcoFalke)
bf7635963c tests: Test specific upgradewallet scenarios and that upgrades work (Andrew Chow)
4b418a9dec test: Add test_framework/bdb.py module for inspecting bdb files (Andrew Chow)
092fc43485 tests: Add a sha256sum_file function to util (Andrew Chow)
0bd995aa19 wallet: upgrade the CHDChain version number when upgrading to split hd (Andrew Chow)
8e32e1c41c wallet: remove nWalletMaxVersion (Andrew Chow)
bd7398cc62 wallet: have ScriptPubKeyMan::Upgrade check against the new version (Andrew Chow)
5f720544f3 wallet: Add GetClosestWalletFeature function (Andrew Chow)
842ae3842d wallet: Add utility method for CanSupportFeature (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR cleans up the wallet upgrade mechanism a bit, fixes some probably bugs, and adds more test cases.
The `nWalletMaxVersion` member variable has been removed as it made `CanSupportFeature` unintuitive and was causing a couple of bugs. The reason this was introduced originally was to allow a wallet upgrade to only occur when the new feature is first used. While this makes sense for the old `-upgradewallet` option, for an RPC, this does not quite make sense. It's more intuitive for an upgrade to occur if possible if the `upgradewallet` RPC is used as that's an explicit request to upgrade a particular wallet to a newer version. `nWalletMaxVersion` was only relevant for upgrades to `FEATURE_WALLETCRYPT` and `FEATURE_COMPRPUBKEY` both of which are incredibly old features. So for such wallets, the behavior of `upgradewallet` will be that the feature is enabled immediately without the wallet needing to be encrypted at that time (note that `FEATURE_WALLETCRYPT` indicates support for encryption, not that the wallet is encrypted) or for a new key to be generated.
`CanSupportFeature` would previously indicate whether we could upgrade to `nWalletMaxVersion` not just whether the current wallet version supported a feature. While this property was being used to determine whether we should upgrade to HD and HD chain split, it was also causing a few bugs. Determining whether we should upgrade to HD or HD chain split is resolved by passing into `ScriptPubKeyMan::Upgrade` the version we are upgrading to and checking against that. By removing `nWalletMaxVersion` we also fix a bug where you could upgrade to HD chain split without the pre-split keypool.
`nWalletMaxVersion` was also the version that was being reported by `getwalletinfo` which meant that the version reported was not always consistent across restarts as it depended on whether `upgradewallet` was used. Additionally to make the wallet versions consistent with actually supported versions, instead of just setting the wallet version to whatever is given to `upgradewallet`, we normalize the version number to the closest supported version number. For example, if given 150000, we would store and report 139900.
Another bug where CHDChain was not being upgraded to the version supporting HD chain split is also fixed by this PR.
Lastly several more tests have been added. Some refactoring to the test was made to make these tests easier. These tests check specific upgrading scenarios, such as from non-HD (version 60000) to HD to pre-split keypool. Although not specifically related to `upgradewallet`, `UpgradeKeyMetadata` is now being tested too.
Part of the new tests is checking that the wallet files are identical before and after failed upgrades. To facilitate this, a utility function `sha256sum_file` has been added. Another part of the tests is to examine the wallet file itself to ensure that the records in the wallet.dat file have been correctly modified. So a new `bdb.py` module has been added to deserialize the BDB db of the wallet.dat file. This format isn't explicitly documented anywhere, but the code and comments in BDB's source code in file `dbinc/db_page.h` describe it. This module just dumps all of the fields into a dict.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
approach ACK 5f9c0b6360
laanwj:
Code review ACK 5f9c0b6360
jonatack:
ACK 5f9c0b6360, approach seems fine, code review, only skimmed the test changes but they look well done, rebased on current master, debug built and verified the `wallet_upgradewallet.py` test runs green both before and after running `test/get_previous_releases.py -b v0.19.1 v0.18.1 v0.17.2 v0.16.3 v0.15.2`
Tree-SHA512: 7c4ebf420850d596a586cb6dd7f2ef39c6477847d12d105fcd362abb07f2a8aa4f7afc5bfd36cbc8b8c72fcdd1de8d2d3f16ad8e8ba736b6f4f31f133fe5feba
5e146022da wallet: fix scanning progress calculation for single block range (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
If the blockchain is rescanned for a single block (i.e. start and stop hashes are equal, and with that also the estimated start/stop verification progress values) the progress calculation could lead to a NaN value caused by a division by zero (0.0/0.0), resulting in an invalid JSON result for the `getwalletinfo` RPC. This PR fixes this behaviour by setting the progress to zero in that special case. Fixes#20297.
The behaviour can easily be reproduced by continuously running single block rescans in an endless loop, e.g. via
```bash
#!/bin/bash
while true
do
bitcoin-cli rescanblockchain $(bitcoin-cli getblockcount)
done
```
and at the same time perform some `getwalletinfo` RPCs.
On the master branch, this leads to frequent invalid responses (tested on mainchain):
```
$ bitcoin-cli getwalletinfo
error: couldn't parse reply from server
$ curl --user `cat ~/.bitcoin/.cookie` --data-binary '{"jsonrpc": "1.0", "id": "curltest", "method": "getwalletinfo", "params": []}' -H 'content-type: text/plain;' http://127.0.0.1:8332/
{"result":{"walletname":"","walletversion":169900,"format":"bdb","balance":0.00000000,"unconfirmed_balance":0.00000000,"immature_balance":0.00000000,"txcount":0,"keypoololdest":1603677276,"keypoolsize":1000,"hdseedid":"3196e33ecb47c7130e6ca60f2f895f9259860dca","keypoolsize_hd_internal":1000,"paytxfee":0.00000000,"private_keys_enabled":true,"avoid_reuse":false,"scanning":{"duration":0,"progress":},"descriptors":false},"error":null,"id":"curltest"}
```
(note that missing value for "progress" in the JSON result).
On the PR branch, the behaviour doesn't occur anymore.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 5e146022da
promag:
Core review ACK 5e146022da.
Tree-SHA512: f0e6aad5a6cd08b36c5fe820fff0ef26663229b39169a4dbe757f3c795a41cf5c69c9dc90efe7515675ae1059307f8971123781a0514d10704123a6f28b125ab
If the blockchain is rescanned for a single block (i.e. start and stop hashes
are equal, and with that also the estimated verification progress) the progress
calculation could lead to a NaN value caused by a division by zero, resulting in
an invalid JSON result for the getwalletinfo RPC. Fixed by setting the progress
to zero in that special case.
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
538be4219a wallet: fix importdescriptor silent fail (Ivan Metlushko)
Pull request description:
Currently `importdescriptor` command will successfully import a descriptor with hardened derivations into a watch-only wallet while silently failing to expand the descriptor to fill the cache. This leads to a broken wallet state and failure to load such wallet due to missing cache on subsequent restart.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 538be4219a
achow101:
ACK 538be4219a
meshcollider:
utACK 538be4219a
Tree-SHA512: 4bdd0ab4437d55b3f1a79c3a300a0b186089155c020fe220a73d0cce274de47d90371d88918d39fd795f9fccf8db328f1e322d29a6062f9ce94a1c254398f004
bd93fc9945 Fix change detection of imported internal descriptors (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Import internal descriptors were having address book entries added which meant they would be detected as non-change. Fix this and add a test for it.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK bd93fc9945
meshcollider:
utACK bd93fc9945
promag:
Code review ACK bd93fc9945.
Tree-SHA512: 8fa9e364be317627ec171eedffdb505976c0e7f1e55bc7e8cfdffa3aeea5db24d231f55166602cd0e97a5ba621acc871de0a765c75d0c65678f83e93c3b657c5
nWalletMaxVersion was used to allow an upgrade to a version only
when the new feature was used. This makes sense for the old
-upgradewallet startup option. But because upgradewallet is now a RPC,
putting off the version bump like this does not make sense. Instead,
immediately upgrading to the given version number makes sense.
Instead of using CanSupportFeature and relying on nWalletMaxVersion,
take the new version we are upgrading to and use IsSupportedFeature
with that and the previous wallet version.
MakeWalletDatabase no longer has a default DatabaseFormat. Instead
callers, like CWallet::Create, need to specify the database type to
create if the file does not exist. If it exists and NONE is given, then
CreateWalletDatabase will try to autodetect the type.
We never need to open database in read-only mode as it's controlled
separately for every batch.
Also we can safely create database if it doesn't exist already
because require_existing option is verified in MakeDatabase
before creating a new WalletDatabase instance.
Instead of hacking OutputGroup::m_ancestors to discourage the inclusion
of partial groups via the eligibility filter, add a parameter to the
eligibility filter that indicates whether we want to include the group.
Then for those partial groups, don't return them in GroupOutputs if we
indicate they aren't desired.
69cf5d4eeb [test] Make sure send rpc returns fee reason (Sishir Giri)
d5863c0b3e [send] Make send RPCs return fee reason (Sishir Giri)
Pull request description:
Whenever a wallet funds a transaction, the fee reason is reported to the user only if the verbose is set to true. I added an extra parameter to `CreateTransaction` function in wallet.cpp. Then I implemented the fee reason return logic in `SendMoney` in rpcwallet.cpp, followed by verbose parameter in `sendtoaddress` and `sendmany` functions. I also added a fee reason test case in walletbasic.py.
link to the issue: https://github.com/MarcoFalke/bitcoin-core/issues/22#issue-616251578
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 69cf5d4eeb
meshcollider:
utACK 69cf5d4eeb
Tree-SHA512: 2e3af32dcfbd5511ba95f8bc8edca7acfe709a8430ff03e43172e5d0af3dfa4b2f57906978e7f272d878043b9ed8c6004674cf47d7496b005d5f612e9a58aa0e
OutputGroup will handle the fee and effective value computations
inside of Insert. It now needs to take the effective feerate and long
term feerates as arguments to its constructor.
Using the zmq notifications to avoid excessive mempool polling can be difficult
given the current notifications available. It announces all transactions
being added to mempool or included in blocks, but announces no evictions
and gives no indication if the transaction is in the mempool or a block.
Block notifications for zmq are also substandard, in that it only announces
block tips, while all block transactions are still announced.
This commit adds a unified stream which can be used to closely track mempool:
1) getrawmempool to fill out mempool knowledge
2) if txhash is announced, add or remove from set
based on add/remove flag
3) if blockhash is announced, get block txn list,
remove from those transactions local view of mempool
4) if we drop a sequence number, go to (1)
The mempool sequence number starts at the value 1, and
increments each time a transaction enters the mempool,
or is evicted from the mempool for any reason, including
block inclusion. The mempool sequence number is published
via ZMQ for any transaction-related notification.
These features allow for ZMQ/RPC consumer to track mempool
state in a more exacting way, without unnecesarily polling
getrawmempool. See interface_zmq.py::test_mempool_sync for
example usage.
Although loadwallet() in rpcwallet.cpp assumes LoadWallet() always
assign some value to the 'status', but LoadWallet() does not do so
in some situation.
This fixes above and prevends loadwallet() returns ambiguous error code.
f1ee37319a wallet: Reload previously loaded wallets on GUI startup (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Enable the GUI to also use the load_on_startup feature. Wallets loaded in the GUI always have load_on_startup=true. When they are unloaded from the GUI, load_on_startup=false.
To facilitate this change, UpdateWalletSetting is moved into the wallet module and called from within LoadWallet, RemoveWallet, and Createwallet. This change does not actually touch the GUI code but rather the wallet functions that are shared between the GUI and RPC.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
Tested ACK f1ee37319a - works as expected. Wallets loaded via bitcoin-cli (in `-server` mode) or through the RPC console won't be loaded on startup but wallets loaded via the GUI menu will.
kristapsk:
ACK f1ee37319a, I have tested the code.
Tree-SHA512: f5b44aa763cf761d919015c5fbc0600b72434aa71e3b57007fd7530a29c3da1a9a0c98c4f22cb6cdffba61150a31170056a7d4737625e7b76f6958f3d584da8c
Checks are now consolidated in MakeBerkeleyDatabase function instead of
happening in higher level code.
This commit does not change behavior except for error messages which now
include more complete information.
This removes a source of complexity and indirection that makes it harder to
understand path checking code. Path checks will be simplified in upcoming
commits.
There is no change in behavior in this commit other than a slightly more
descriptive error message in `loadwallet` if the default "" wallet can't be
found. (The error message is improved more in upcoming commit "wallet: Remove
path checking code from loadwallet RPC".)
