7aab8d1024 [style] Code style fixups in GetWarnings() (John Newbery)
492c6dc1e7 util: change GetWarnings parameter to bool (John Newbery)
869b6314fd [qt] remove unused parameter from getWarnings() (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
`GetWarnings()` changes the format of the output warning string based on a passed-in string argument that can be set to "gui" or "statusbar".
Change the argument to a bool:
- there are only two types of behaviour, so a bool is a more natural argument type
- changing the name to `verbose` does not set any expectations for the how the calling code will use the returned string (currently, `statusbar` is used for RPC warnings, not a status bar)
- removes some error-handling code for when the passed-in string is not one of the two strings expected.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK 7aab8d1024
practicalswift:
ACK 7aab8d1024 -- diff looks correct :)
MarcoFalke:
ACK 7aab8d1024 otherwise.
promag:
Code review ACK 7aab8d1024.
Tree-SHA512: 75882c6e3e44aa9586411b803149b36ba487f4eb9cac3f5c8f07cd9f586870bba4488a51e674cf8147f05718534f482836e6a4e3f66e0d4ef6821900c7dfd04e
fa8e650b52 rest: Use mempool from node context instead of global (MarcoFalke)
fa660d65d7 node: Use mempool from node context instead of global (MarcoFalke)
facbaf092f rpc: Use mempool from node context instead of global (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently they are identical, but in the future we might want to turn
the mempool into a unique_ptr. Replacing the global with the mempool
pointer from the node context simplifies this step.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK fa8e650b5
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa8e650b52, Only the discussed REST server changes since the last review.
Tree-SHA512: 0836f3f39cf90306455962918446e5f8612e88c32072b92afc30929aea1f17430bbda0e2b3668d36c9d6b97d63a93cf4903185194571108642b7bf5a39b89125
GetWarnings() changes the format of the output warning string based on a
passed-in string argument that can be set to "gui" or "statusbar".
Change the argument to a bool:
- there are only two types of behaviour, so a bool is a more natural
argument type
- changing the name to 'verbose' does not set any expectations for the
how the calling code will use the returned string (currently,
'statusbar' is used for RPC warnings, not a status bar)
- removes some error-handling code for when the passed-in string is not
one of the two strings expected.
7d263571be rpc: require second argument only for scantxoutset start action (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
It was reported on [IRC](http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-12-11.html#l-377) that `scantxoutset`'s API was broken in 0.19.0:
```
<belcher> i think scantxoutset may have been broken in bitcoin core 0.19 ? regardless of what parameters i run it with (e.g. "scantxoutset abort", "scantxoutset status") it just returns the help doc, according to the release notes the only change was https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16285/files but i dont see anything that wouldve broken it, it works fine in 0.18
<belcher> im on regtest, in case its important
<harding> I can confirm `scantxoutset abort` returns the help doc on latest master. Waiting for 0.18.1 to start now to attempt to reproduce there.
<harding> It looks like it's expecting a second parameter (even though that doesn't make sense with "abort").
<jonatack> Same for me as well
<harding> Can also confirm that `scantxoutset abort` returns the expected result on 0.18.1.
```
As noted in the conversation, previously, the second argument of `scanobjects` is only required for the `start` action. `Stop` and `abort` actions did not and could work without them.
It appears that this was broken by #16240 which enforced the size of the arguments to match the listed required arguments.
To fix this issue, this PR makes the `scanobjects` argument an optional argument. Then only in the `start` action do we check whether the `scanobjects` argument is there and throw an informative error about that. Also a test is added for this case.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 7d263571be
promag:
ACK 7d263571be.
Tree-SHA512: 828bdfe47f4fffa5d00a2cf88db6cea4a2714d9c49276841ca5cbdd1603b87bb6862147b86edcf36d7b40314ddb80b1a07fd399faf288572c55cc788c5cf9526
773d4572a4 Mark PSBTs spending unspendable outputs as invalid in analysis (Andrew Chow)
638e40cb60 Have a PSBTAnalysis state that indicates invalid PSBT (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When analyzing an unspendable PSBT, report that it is unspendable and exit analysis early.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 773d457
instagibbs:
After some thought ACK 773d4572a4
Tree-SHA512: 99b0cb2fa1ea37593fc65a20effe881639d69ddeeecf5197bc87bc7f2220cbeb40f1d429d517e4d27f2e9fb563a00cd845d2b4b1ce05246a75a6cb56fb9b0ba5
Currently they are identical, but in the future we might want to turn
the mempool into a unique_ptr. Replacing the global with the mempool
pointer from the node context simplifies this step.
d0dab897af Refactor: Require scriptPubKey to get wallet SigningProvider (Andrew Chow)
4b0c718f8f Accumulate result UniValue in SignTransaction (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Easier to review ignoring whitespace:
git log -p -n1 -w
This commit does not change behavior. It passes new CScript arguments to
signing functions, but the arguments aren't currently used.
Split from #17261
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK d0dab897af
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK d0dab897af. Thanks for the SignTransaction update. No other changes since last review
Sjors:
Code review ACK d0dab897af
promag:
Code review ACK d0dab897af.
meshcollider:
Code review ACK d0dab897af
Tree-SHA512: c3f52df20fd9d6b3b5aa65562cf5f7dce7b7f44c148b0f988f8b578fce2a28e9b7bf010f5f04bb5bf60f5272b2899f1dbbfb8aee81579c21c9cba559d1d2bb70
e9a27cf338 refactor: Remove unused COINBASE_FLAGS (Neha Narula)
Pull request description:
Commit d449772cf6 stopped setting
COINBASE_FLAGS, and it looks like it hasn't been used since P2SH.
Following up on #17489, remove COINBASE_FLAGS which is unused. I verified that removing this did not change the contents of the coinbase's scriptSig.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK e9a27cf338
MarcoFalke:
ACK e9a27cf338💻
Tree-SHA512: f9dac124ce7e3edcae974137764bb5039387b1b123b86af44486e398aa4a8d91a9ecf640e207b364ae303acbbaee7cca300d303ea3d6869ba9cae2bf555a6334
Commit d449772cf6 stopped setting
COINBASE_FLAGS, and it looks like it hasn't been used since P2SH.
Update the help string to remove "flags", which is not specified in
BIP 22.
Invalid PSBTs need to be re-created, so the next role is the
Creator (new PSBTRole). Additionally, we need to know what went
wrong so an error field was added to PSBTAnalysis.
A PSBTAnalysis indicating invalid will have empty everything,
next will be set to PSBTRole::CREATOR, and an error message.
SignTransaction will be called multiple times in the future. Pass
it a result UniValue so that it can accumulate the results of multiple
SignTransaction passes.
Currently it is an alias to the global ::mempool and should be used as
follows.
* Node code (validation and transaction relay) can use either ::mempool
or node.mempool, whichever seems a better fit.
* RPC code should use the added convenience getter EnsureMempool, which
makes sure the mempool exists before use. This prepares the RPC code
to a future where the mempool might be disabled at runtime or compile
time.
* Test code should use m_node.mempool directly, as the mempool is always
initialized for tests.
92b2f5306b test: add dumptxoutset RPC test (James O'Beirne)
c1ccbc3dde devtools: add utxo_snapshot.sh (James O'Beirne)
57cf74c991 rpc: add dumptxoutset (James O'Beirne)
92fafb3a7d coinstats: add coins_count (James O'Beirne)
707fde7b9b add unused SnapshotMetadata class (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11):
Parent PR: #15606
Issue: #15605
Specification: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/master/proposal
---
This changeset defines the serialization format for UTXO snapshots and adds an RPC command for creating them, `dumptxoutset`. It also adds a convenience script for generating and verifying snapshots at a certain height, since that requires doing a hacky rewind of the chain via `invalidateblock`.
All of this is unused at the moment.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 92b2f5306b
Tree-SHA512: 200dff87767f157d627e99506ec543465d9329860a6cd49363081619c437163a640a46d008faa92b1f44fd403bfc7a7c9e851c658b5a4849efa9a34ca976bf31
c98bd13e67 replace asserts in RPC code with CHECK_NONFATAL and add linter (Adam Jonas)
Pull request description:
- Replace instances of assert in /rpc files and rpcwallet with CHECK_NONFATAL(condition)
- Add a linter to prevent future usage of assert being used in RPC code
ref https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17192
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK c98bd13e67 -- diff looks correct
Tree-SHA512: a16036b6bbcca73a5334665f66e17e1756377d582317568291da1d727fc9cf8c84bac9d9bd099534e1be315345336e5f7b66b93793135155f320dc5862a2d875
ac831339cb doc: Fix some misspellings (randymcmillan)
Pull request description:
Here is a more thorough lint-spelling update.
This PR takes care of easy to fix spelling errors to clean up the linting stages.
There are misspellings coded into the functional tests.
That is a whole separate job within itself.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK ac831339cb -- diff looks correct
Tree-SHA512: d8fad83fed083715655f148263ddeffc6752c8007d568fcf3dc2c418ccd5db70089ce3ccfd3994fcbd78043171402eb9cca5bdd5125287e22c42ea305aaa6e9d
f44abe4bed refactor: Remove addrdb.h dependency from node.h (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
`node.h` includes `addrdb.h` just for the sake of `banmap_t` type.
This PR makes dependencies simpler and explicit.
~Also needless `typedef` has been removed from `enum BanReason`.~
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK f44abe4bed
practicalswift:
ACK f44abe4bed
Tree-SHA512: 33a1be20e5c629daf4a61ebbf93ea6494b9256887cebd4974de4782f6d324404b6cc84909533d9502b2cc19902083f1f9307d4fb7231e67db5b412b842d13072
3ed8e3d079 doc: Remove explicit network name references (Fabian Jahr)
d6e493f0c2 wallet: Remove left-over BIP70 comment (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
A small follow-up to #17165 which removed BIP70 support.
1. Removes one leftover mention of BIP70 in a comment.
2. Removes BIP70 reference in comments on network/chain name strings. These can be removed as they are not really helpful and also incorrect: BIP70 only defines "main" and "test" but not "regtest". If/When signet gets merged we will add another name to the list that is not defined in BIP70. Mostly there is also an exhaustive list of the options included in the comment anyway.
If we would like to keep an identifier for this naming scheme, I would suggest switching to something more generic, like 'short chain name'. Happy to implement that if that is preferred. Alternatively, we could add a reference to `CBaseChainParams`. That would also mean we don't have to change these lines again for signet.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 3ed8e3d079
Tree-SHA512: 9a7c0b9cacbb67bd31a089ffdc6f1ebc7f336493e2c8266eb697da34dce2b505a431d5639a3e4fc34f9287361343e861b55dc2662e0a1d2095cc1046db77d6ee
3004d5a12d [validation] Remove fMissingInputs from AcceptToMemoryPool() (John Newbery)
c428622a5b [validation] Remove unused first_invalid parameter from ProcessNewBlockHeaders() (John Newbery)
7204c6434b [validation] Remove useless ret parameter from Invalid() (John Newbery)
1a37de4b31 [validation] Remove error() calls from Invalid() calls (John Newbery)
067981e492 [validation] Tidy Up ValidationResult class (John Newbery)
a27a2957ed [validation] Add CValidationState subclasses (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Carries out some remaining tidy-ups remaining after PR 15141:
- split ValidationState into TxValidationState and BlockValidationState (commit from ajtowns)
- various minor code style tidy-ups to the ValidationState class
- remove the useless `ret` parameter from `ValidationState::Invalid()`
- remove the now unused `first_invalid` parameter from `ProcessNewBlockHeaders()`
- remove the `fMissingInputs` parameter from `AcceptToMemoryPool()`, and deal with missing inputs the same way as other errors by using the `TxValidationState` object.
Tip for reviewers (thanks ryanofsky!): The first commit ("[validation] Add CValidationState subclasses" ) is huge and can be easier to start reviewing if you revert the rote, mechanical changes:
Substitute the commit hash of commit "[validation] Add CValidationState subclasses" for <CommitHash> in the commands below.
```sh
git checkout <CommitHash>
git grep -l ValidationState | xargs sed -i 's/BlockValidationState\|TxValidationState/CValidationState/g'
git grep -l ValidationResult | xargs sed -i 's/BlockValidationResult\|TxValidationResult/ValidationInvalidReason/g'
git grep -l MaybePunish | xargs sed -i 's/MaybePunishNode\(ForBlock\|ForTx\)/MaybePunishNode/g'
git diff HEAD^
```
After that it's possible to easily see the mechanical changes with:
```sh
git log -p -n1 -U0 --word-diff-regex=. <CommitHash>
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 3004d5a12d
amitiuttarwar:
code review ACK 3004d5a12d. Also built & ran tests locally.
fjahr:
Code review ACK 3004d5a12d . Only nit style change and pure virtual destructor added since my last review.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 3004d5a12d. Just whitespace change and pure virtual destructor added since last review.
Tree-SHA512: 511de1fb380a18bec1944ea82b513b6192df632ee08bb16344a2df3c40811a88f3872f04df24bc93a41643c96c48f376a04551840fd804a961490d6c702c3d36
fa144e6fde rpc: Add generatetodescriptor (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The existing `generatetoaddress` RPC can only generate to scriptPubKeys that can be represented by an address. However, raw scripts (such as `OP_TRUE`) or P2PK can not be represented by an address, which complicates testing.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa144e6fde
Tree-SHA512: aee934ab7e33f07c81f3b4c8ec23e7b6ddf63a1f4b86051af0bd76b75d8da1f51627cc682e5c6e42582340ca576bbf8ff724bdd43f87128ccecfa91e52d30ae7
362ded410b Avoid using g_rpc_node global in wallet code (Russell Yanofsky)
8922d7f6b7 scripted-diff: Remove g_connman, g_banman globals (Russell Yanofsky)
e6f4f895d5 Pass NodeContext, ConnMan, BanMan references more places (Russell Yanofsky)
4d5448c76b MOVEONLY: Move NodeContext struct to node/context.h (Russell Yanofsky)
301bd41a2e scripted-diff: Rename InitInterfaces to NodeContext (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This change is mainly a naming / organization change intended to simplify #10102. It:
- Renames struct InitInterfaces to struct NodeContext and moves it from
src/init.h to src/node/context.h. This is a cosmetic change intended to make
the point of the struct more obvious.
- Gets rid of BanMan and ConnMan globals making them NodeContext members
instead. Getting rid of these globals has been talked about in past as a way
to implement testing and simulations. Making them NodeContext members is a
way of keeping them accessible without the globals.
- Splits g_rpc_interfaces global into g_rpc_node and g_rpc_chain globals. This
better separates node and wallet rpc methods. Node RPC methods should have
access NodeContext, while wallet RPC methods should only have indirect access
to node functionality via interfaces::Chain.
- Adds NodeContext& references to interfaces::Chain class and the
interfaces::MakeChain() function. This is needed to access ConnMan and BanMan
instances without the globals.
- Gets rid of redundant Node and Chain instances in Qt tests. This is
needed due to the previous MakeChain change, and also makes test setup a
little more straightforward. More cleanup could be done in the future, but it
will require deduplication of bitcoind, bitcoin-qt, and TestingSetup init
code.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 362ded410b
Tree-SHA512: 9ae6ff1e33423291d1e52056bac95e0874538390892a6e83c4c115b3c73155a8827c0191b46eb3d14e3b3f6c23ccb08095490880fbc3188026319c71739f7db2
Wallet code should use interfaces::Chain and not directly access to node state.
Add a g_rpc_chain replacement global for wallet code to use, and move
g_rpc_node definition to a libbitcoin_server source file so there are link
errors if wallet code tries to access it.
faeb666536 util: Add CHECK_NONFATAL and use it in src/rpc (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Fixes#17181
Currently, we use `assert` in RPC code to document logic and code assumptions. However, it seems a bit extreme to abort all of Bitcoin Core on an assert failure in one of the RPC threads. I suggest to replace all `assert`s with a macro `CHECK_NONFATAL(condition)` that throws a runtime error when the condition evaluates to `false`. That runtime error will then be returned to the rpc caller and will include instructions to report the error to our issue tracker.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK faeb666536
laanwj:
ACK faeb666536
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK faeb666536
Tree-SHA512: 9b748715a5e0767ac11f1324a95a3a6ec672a0e0658013492219223bda83ce4b1b447fd8183bbb235f7df5ef7dddda7666ad569544b4d61cc65f232ca7a800ec
9075d13153 [docs] Add release notes for removal of REJECT reasons (John Newbery)
04a2f326ec [validation] Fix REJECT message comments (John Newbery)
e9d5a59e34 [validation] Remove REJECT code from CValidationState (John Newbery)
0053e16714 [logging] Don't log REJECT code when transaction is rejected (John Newbery)
a1a07cfe99 [validation] Fix peer punishment for bad blocks (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
We no longer send BIP 61 REJECT messages, so there's no need to set
a REJECT code in the CValidationState object.
Note that there is a minor bug fix in p2p behaviour here. Because the
call to `MaybePunishNode()` in `PeerLogicValidation::BlockChecked()` only
previously happened if the REJECT code was > 0 and < `REJECT_INTERNAL`,
then there are cases were `MaybePunishNode()` can get called where it
wasn't previously:
- when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `CACHED_INVALID`.
- when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `BLOCK_MISSING_PREV`.
Note that `BlockChecked()` cannot fail with an 'internal' reject code. The
only internal reject code was `REJECT_HIGHFEE`, which was only set in
ATMP.
This reverts a minor bug introduced in 5d08c9c579.
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
ACK 9075d13, changes since last reviewed are splitting them in separate commits to ease understanding and fix nits
fjahr:
ACK 9075d13153, confirmed diff to last review was fixing nits in docs/comments.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9075d13153. Only changes since last review are splitting the main commit and updating comments
Tree-SHA512: 58e8a1a4d4e6f156da5d29fb6ad6a62fc9c594bbfc6432b3252e962d0e9e10149bf3035185dc5320c46c09f3e49662bc2973ec759679c0f3412232087cb8a3a7
85016e52f6 [rpc] Fix broken bitcoin-cli examples (Andrew Toth)
Pull request description:
This fixes the `bitcoin-cli` examples for `combinerawtransaction`, `combinepsbt` and `testmempoolaccept`. They currently return `Error parsing JSON`.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 85016e52f6
Tree-SHA512: b561f68f7a188dc91dab1ceb98da3ac3e232143ab2b906c90f95c6b74b584599d0f3b51f067cdd3b1153931f95b3dc385e453b1a0dde86f9cb549b94560f219d
Remove the BIP61 REJECT code from error messages and logs when a
transaction is rejected.
BIP61 support was removed from Bitcoin Core in
fa25f43ac5. The REJECT codes will be
removed from the codebase entirely in the following commit.
