NetBSD doc has not seen any meaningful contribution since 2018.
This PR intends to update the docs so that one can successfully build on
the latest NetBSD release. It also adds dependency information and
instructions to build the GUI.
This new node policy setting enables to accept replaced-by-fee
transaction without inspection of the replaceability signaling
as described in BIP125 "explicit signaling".
If turns on, the node mempool accepts transaction replacement
as described in `policy/mempool-replacements.md`.
The default setting value is `false`, implying opt-in RBF
is enforced.
140d942634 wallet: don't add change fee to target if subtracting fees from output (S3RK)
Pull request description:
Change fee is payed by the recipient, so we don't need to add it to our target for coin selection.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 140d942634
ishaanam:
ACK 140d942634
furszy:
Code review ACK 140d9426
Tree-SHA512: b5efd0264c47ecee9204a3fd039bad24c69f9e614c6e1d9bb240ee5be6356b175aa074f3be123e6cfb8becd4d7bd1028eebe18801662cc69d19413d8d5a9dd5c
f1c16ed733 doc: remove note on arm cross-compilation from build-unix.md (Jarol Rodriguez)
Pull request description:
No reason to have this here with outdated information. We already point users to the depends readme, the doc cross builders should be pointed to, within this doc.
Master: [render](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/build-unix.md)
PR: [render](f1c16ed733/doc/build-unix.md)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK f1c16ed733
Tree-SHA512: 395c1cd5dd9168cd60d2165a9d826a3cb438b84bbe3d26c18602e7f7b7961444f2f3f6504323b2bac15c943df8c2c734c8f642f40159e88a704ec4abc3d7eeaa
No reason to have this here with outdated information. We already point
users to the depends readme, the doc cross builders should be pointed to
, within this doc.
c0a5fceee9 test: Add test for erase orphan tx conflicted by block (Hennadii Stepanov)
fa45bb2119 test: Add test for erase orphan tx included by block (Hennadii Stepanov)
5c049780c8 test: Add test for erase orphan tx from peer (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following cases:
- erase orphan transactions when a peer is disconnected
- erase an orphan transaction when it is included in a new tip block
- erase an orphan transaction when it is conflicted with other transactions included in a new tip block
Found useful while working on #19374.
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
tACK c0a5fceee9 (`make check` and `test/functional/test_runner.py`).
kouloumos:
ACK c0a5fceee9 with a nit per https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19393#discussion_r899156623.
pg156:
Reviewed to c0a5fceee9. Concept ACK. Agree due to the lack of RPC calls to inspect orphan pool, using `assert_debug_log` to match strings in log is a reasonable way to test.
Tree-SHA512: 98f8deeee2d1c588c7e28a82e513d4a18655084198369db33fe2710458251eeaffed030626940072d7576f57fcbf7d856d761990129e2ca9e372d2ccbd86d07d
Instead of calling GetCachableAmount twice, which will result in
iterating through all the transaction txins/txouts and calling
GetDebit/GetCredit (which lock cs_wallet), just merge the filters and do
it once.
cccf691c24 contrib: dedup `get_witness_script` helper in signet miner (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The helper `get_witness_script` is already available in the `blocktools` module of our test framework, i.e. there is no need to re-implement it in the signet miner script. Note that the cast from CScript to bytes is necessary for applying the `+=` operator on the scriptPubKey later, which would fail for CScript:
```
File "/home/honeybadger/bitcoin/contrib/signet/miner", line 132, in signet_txs
txs[0].vout[-1].scriptPubKey += CScriptOp.encode_op_pushdata(SIGNET_HEADER)
File "/home/honeybadger/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/script.py", line 460, in __add__
raise NotImplementedError
NotImplementedError
```
ACKs for top commit:
kallewoof:
ACK cccf691c24
Tree-SHA512: 5965a9f27626e3dd2769a0436263fb646e9d4b67071505122c017f7b0050250e83f524135e57093870b8c64894d64762a51d2c3c68d52dd1e545f23d4734fecb
99f4785cad Replace GetTime() with NodeClock in MaybeSendGetHeaders() (Suhas Daftuar)
abf5d16c24 Don't send getheaders message when another request is outstanding (Suhas Daftuar)
ffe87db247 Cleanup received_new_header calculation to use WITH_LOCK (Suhas Daftuar)
6d95cd3e74 Move peer state updates from headers message into separate function (Suhas Daftuar)
2b341db731 Move headers direct fetch to end of ProcessHeadersMessage (Suhas Daftuar)
29c4518522 Move headers-direct-fetch logic into own function (Suhas Daftuar)
bf8ea6df75 Move additional headers fetching to own function (Suhas Daftuar)
9492e93bf9 Add helper function for checking header continuity (Suhas Daftuar)
7f2450871b Move handling of unconnecting headers into own function (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Change `getheaders` messages so that we wait up to 2 minutes for a response to a prior `getheaders` message before issuing a new one.
Also change the handling of the `getheaders` message sent in response to a block INV, so that we no longer use the hashstop variable (including the hash stop will just mean that if our peer's headers chain is longer, then we won't learn
it, so there's no benefit to using hashstop).
Also, now respond to a `getheaders` during IBD with an empty headers message (rather than nothing) -- this better conforms to the intent of the new logic that it's better to not ignore a peer's `getheaders` message, even if you have nothing to give. This also avoids a lot of functional tests breaking.
This PR also reworks the headers processing logic to make it more readable.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 99f4785cad ; code review, check over new logic of when to send getheaders messages
dergoegge:
Code review ACK 99f4785cad
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 99f4785cad
sipa:
utACK 99f4785cad
w0xlt:
tACK 99f4785cad Good improvement in the code.
Tree-SHA512: b8a63f6f71ac83e292edc0200def7835ad8b06b2955dd34e3ea6fac85980fa6962efd31d689ef5ea121ff5477ec14aafa4bbe2d0db134c05f4a31a57a8ced365
31346a3196 [ci] apply cache size limit and print ccache statistics in "ARM64 Android APK" (sogoagain)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25475
Modified `ci/test/06_script_a.sh` file to apply cache size limit and print ccahce statistics in "ARM64 Android APK" task.
Please feel free to give me any feedback. Thanks.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 31346a3196, my previous [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25530#issuecomment-1173822177) can be considered as a suggestion for a follow up.
Tree-SHA512: 1204fe78f90a34f0c74f256309626c6bbba0848e5f7c632ee2ca96529dc7243eb7282d83bab6c960b0c9f6ee21a49528b40c45be1e3da5958e2db83f4c00a1d2
1770be72d5 test: pass `dustrelayfee=0` option for tests using dust (instead of `acceptnonstdtxn=1`) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
By specifying the `dustrelayfee=0` option instead of the more generic `acceptnonstdtxn=1`, we can be more specific about what
part of the transaction is non-standard and can be sure that all other aspects follow the standard policy.
Note that for the test `feature_dbcrash.py`, the UTXO creation at the start of the test has to be split up to several txs to not exceed the tx standard size limit of 100k vbytes
4129c13754/src/policy/policy.h (L26-L27)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 1770be72d5
Tree-SHA512: 5cb852a92883a7443ab7dc15b48efa76b5d1424b6b0da1fa6b075fbe9a83522e3ff60382d36c08d4b07143ed898c115614582474e37837332caaee73b0db0e47
By specifying the `dustrelayfee=0` option instead of the more
generic `acceptnonstdtxn=1`, we can be more specific about what
part of the transaction is non-standard and can be sure that all
other aspects follow the standard policy.
18f5355f3a Remove outdated comment (Igor Bubelov)
Pull request description:
Looks like this comment is no longer relevant, the last files which matched `index/*.cpp` pattern were removed in f100687566
ACKs for top commit:
dongcarl:
ACK 18f5355f3a
shaavan:
ACK 18f5355f3a
Tree-SHA512: d3fcc2db0940f81ce521fddff836f271709ea327c357942383f8aff6c7089e74490fa720e7a2916900215c733d2b64960c1aa185f0c9b1567fce90a249d405e0
27c8056885 rpc: Disallow gettxoutsetinfo queries for a specific block with use_index=false (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
In the `gettxoutsetinfo` RPC, if we set `use_index` to false but specify `hash_or_height`, we currently hit a nonfatal error, e.g. `gettxoutsetinfo "muhash" "1" "false"` results in:
```
Internal bug detected: "!pindex || pindex->GetBlockHash() == view->GetBestBlock()"
rpc/blockchain.cpp:836 (GetUTXOStats)
```
The failing check was added in [#24410](664a14ba7c), but the previous behavior, returning the specified height together with data corresponding to the tip's height, was very confusing too in my opinion.
Fix this by disallowing the interaction of `use_index=false` and `hash_or_height` and add a RPC help example with `-named` because users might ask themselves how to use the `use_index` flag witout hitting an error.
An alternative way would be to allow the interaction if the specified `hash_or_height` happens to correspond to the tip (which should then also be applied to the `HASH_SERIALIZED` check before). If reviewers would prefer that, please say so.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
utACK 27c8056885
shaavan:
ACK 27c8056885
Tree-SHA512: 1d81c34eaa48c86134a2cf7193246d5de6bfd819d413c3b3fae9cb9290e0297a336111eeaecede2f0f020b0f9a181d240de0da4493e1b387fe63b8189154442b
