7e3d4f8e86 test: add coverage to ensure the first arg of scantxoutset is needed (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
Include a test that checks whether the first argument of scantxoutset RPC call "start" is required.
The rpc call should fail if the "start" argument is not provided.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 7e3d4f8e86
Tree-SHA512: 6a456af9f3ccd5437be2edcd61936eb9f9c21ab926a6056c2c11b6b5121d1caca4e1f2ffd09015f9414af152c635a20e1da041eefdef980afbe8a0e8ccce07bd
afc2dd5484 test: various `converttopsbt` check cleanups in rpc_psbt.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
In the functional test rpc_psbt.py, some comments around the `converttopsbt` RPC checks are wrong or outdated and can be removed:
> _Error could be either "TX decode failed" (segwit inputs causes
> parsing to fail) or "Inputs must not have scriptSigs and
> scriptWitnesses"_
Decoding a valid TX with at least one input always succeeds with the [heuristic](e352f5ab6b/src/core_read.cpp (L126)), i.e. this comment is not right and we can assert for the error string "Inputs must not have scriptSigs and scriptWitnesses" on the calls below.
> _We must set iswitness=True because the serialized transaction has
> inputs and is therefore a witness transaction_
This is also unneeded (and confusing, w.r.t. "is therefore a witness transaction"?), for a TX with one input there is no need to set the `iswitness` parameter. For sake of completeness, we still keep one variant where iswitness is explicitly set to true.
Lastly, there is a superflous `converttopsbt` call on the raw tx which is the same as just [about ~10 lines above](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/rpc_psbt.py#L393-L397), so it can be removed.
ACKs for top commit:
ismaelsadeeq:
tested ACK afc2dd5484
achow101:
ACK afc2dd5484
Tree-SHA512: 467efefdb3f61efdb79145044b90fc8dc2f0c425f078117a99112b0074e7d4a32c34e464f665fbf8de70d06caaa5d4ad5908c1d75d2e7607eccb0837480afab3
c4981e7f63 prune, import: fixes#23852 (mruddy)
Pull request description:
Fixes#23852
This allows pruning to work during the `-loadblock` import process.
An example use case is where you have a clean set of block files and you want to create a pruned node from them, but you don't want to alter the input set of block files.
#23852 noted that pruning was not working reliably during the loadblock import process. The reason why the loadblock process was not pruning regularly as it progressed is that the pruning process (`BlockManager::FindFilesToPrune`) checks the tip height of the active chainstate, and `CChainState::ActivateBestChain` was not called (which updates that tip height) in `ThreadImport` until after all the import files were processed.
An example bash command line that makes it easy to import a bunch of block files:
```
./src/qt/bitcoin-qt -debug -logthreadnames -datadir=/tmp/btc -prune=550 -loadblock=/readonly/btc/main/blk{00000..00043}.dat
```
One interesting side note is that `CChainState::ActivateBestChain` can be called while the import process is running (in the `loadblk` thread) by concurrent network message processing activity in the `msghand` thread. For example, one way to reproduce this easily is with the `getblockfrompeer` RPC (requesting a block with height greater than 100000) run from a node connected to an importing node. There are other ways too, but this is an easy way. I only mention this to explain how the `max_prune_height=225719` log message in the original issue came to occur.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK c4981e7f63
Tree-SHA512: d287c7753952c22f598ba782914c47f45ad44ce60b0fbce9561354e701f1a2a98bafaaaa106c8428690b814e281305ca3622b177ed3cb2eb7559f07c958ab537
Also add flag to allow RPC methods that intendionally accept options and
parameters with the same name bypass the check.
Check and flag were suggested by ajtowns
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26485#issuecomment-1507916357
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
fa6e2bfd05 ci: Use arm_container.dockerfile (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This allows to cache the image and thus speed up the CI task
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
nice ACK fa6e2bfd05
hebasto:
ACK fa6e2bfd05
Tree-SHA512: 3b7f734799bd8a3ca9166e85d2cd8f68c134c32a496757eafb118250c0b158d0d76ead0c461e307d6440a622fe51bc599aa13e67766ce232b750ed0a66d4b450
OBJ_NAMED_PARAMS type works the same as OBJ type except it registers the object
keys to be accepted as top-level named-only RPC parameters. Generated
documentation also lists the object keys seperately in a new "Named arguments"
section of help text.
Named-only RPC parameters have the same semantics as python keyword-only
arguments (https://peps.python.org/pep-3102/). They are always required to be
passed by name, so they don't affect interpretation of positional arguments,
and aren't affected when positional arguments are added or removed.
The new OBJ_NAMED_PARAMS type is used in the next commit to make it easier to
pass options values to various RPC methods.
Co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <github@achow101.com>
daba95700b refactor: Make ListSelected return vector (Sebastian Falbesoner)
94776621ba wallet: Move CoinCointrol definitions to .cpp (Aurèle Oulès)
1db23da6e1 wallet: Use std::optional for GetExternalOutput and fixups (Aurèle Oulès)
becc45b589 scripted-diff: Rename setSelected->m_selected_inputs (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
- Moves CoinControl function definitions from `coincontrol.h` to `coincontrol.cpp`
- Adds more documentation
- Renames class member for an improved comprehension
- Use `std::optional` for `GetExternalOutput`
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK daba95700b
Xekyo:
ACK daba95700b
Tree-SHA512: 3bf2dc834a3246c2f53f8c55154258e605fcb169431d3f7b156931f33c7e3b1ae28e03e16b37f9140a827890eb7798be485b2c36bfc23ff29bb01763f289a07c
In the wallet ckey loading test, we modify various ckey records to test
corruption handling. As the database is now a mockable database, we can
modify the records that the database will be initialized with. This
avoids having to use the verbose database reading and writing functions.
Since we have a mockable wallet database, we don't really need to be
using BDB or SQLite's in-memory database capabilities. It doesn't really
help us to be using those as we aren't doing anything that requires one
type of db over the other, and will just prefer SQLite if it's
available.
MockableDatabase is suitable for these uses, so use
CreateMockableWalletDatabase to use that.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i "s/CreateMockWalletDatabase(options)/CreateMockableWalletDatabase()/" $(git grep -l "CreateMockWalletDatabase(options)" -- ":(exclude)src/wallet/walletdb.*")
sed -i "s/CreateMockWalletDatabase/CreateMockableWalletDatabase/" $(git grep -l "CreateMockWalletDatabase" -- ":(exclude)src/wallet/walletdb.*")
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
MockableDatabase is a WalletDatabase that allows us to interact with the
records to change them independently from the wallet, as well as
changing the return values from within the tests. This will give us
greater flexibility in testing the wallet.
4581a682d2 clarify processing of mempool-msgs when NODE_BLOOM (0xb10c)
Pull request description:
Under which circumstances we process received 'mempool' P2P messages caused confusion in #27426. Rather than bike-shedding the formulation of the IF-statement, this adds a comment clarifying when we process the message. Also, correcting the `m_send_mempool` description.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
ACK 4581a682d2
willcl-ark:
ACK 4581a682d2
glozow:
ACK 4581a682d2
Tree-SHA512: 51ec673c3446b67c26f6c715430d0708b998b256260f5f5d0c034f271be8447d0bb8540dfd3879aa51904512fb26c9411766786c86287acff62d037a1df88855
65ba8a79a2 contrib: add ELF ABI check to symbol-check.py (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Check that the operating system ABI version embedded into the release binaries, is the version we expect it to be.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 65ba8a79a2
TheCharlatan:
ACK 65ba8a79a2
Tree-SHA512: 798d7c3b05183becf113a2ea13d889e18f1cec01d3cc279e64dbddede4d57f87444978f3f52c44bc5fdf0ba93d77c7c0be37aa815f93f348c35da45dc3d30ac2
fa17767154 test: Simplify feature_fastprune.py (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The goal of the test is a single regression check to see if a RPC times out. It shouldn't do more than calling the RPC (and the minimum work needed to get there).
Fix that by removing all blocktools imports and a `for` loop.
ACKs for top commit:
pinheadmz:
ACK fa17767154
theStack:
ACK fa17767154
Tree-SHA512: c9c0154102199b250015ece53005a14d52d857dfa986f3b02a2cb899f16ac8e040d24eb826f35ba15e5ee22ee6a59bf8f74bb8d576b9a12ac6e888beeaaf81cc
Under which circumstances we process received 'mempool' P2P messages
caused confusion in #27426. Rather than bikeshedding the formulation
of the IF-statement, this adds a comment clarifing when we process
the message. Also, correcting the comment of `m_send_mempool`.
Co-authored-by: willcl-ark <will8clark@gmail.com>
710b83938a rpc: return block hash & height in getbalances, gettransaction & getwalletinfo JSONs (Harris)
Pull request description:
Reopens#18570 and closes#18567.
I have rebased the original PR.
Not sure why the original got closed as it was about to get merged.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 710b83938a
Tree-SHA512: d4478d990be98b1642e9ffb2930987f4a224e8bd64e2e35a5dda927a54c509ec9d712cd0eac35dc2bb89f00a1678e530ce14d7445f1dd93aa3a4cce2bc9b130d
24d55fb9cf test: added coverage to rpc_scantxoutset.py (kevkevin)
Pull request description:
Included a test that checks if an invalid first argument is entered we receive a rpc error. The rpc should fail if "start", "status" or "abort" is not the first command.
Relavant: mentioned in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27422
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 24d55fb9cf
theStack:
ACK 24d55fb9cf
Tree-SHA512: 4b804235d3fa17c7bf492068ab47c1f87cb6cfc1a428c51e273ec059d3c41f581bcc467bb5d6d8bbf2fab14c60cd1c52a30c50009efe1c9b5adee70c88897ad9
82e6e3cae5 test: add ripemd160 to test framework modules list (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Currently test runner doesn't execute the unit tests of the ripemd160 module, so add it to the list. All other framework modules that contain unit tests are included, as can be easily checked via
`$ git grep unittest.TestCase ./test/functional/test_framework/`
This is a late follow-up to PR #23716 (commit ad3e9e1f21).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 82e6e3cae5
Tree-SHA512: 10940e215f728291c7149931a356bfc42795c098bda76d760dfa68f86443a3755e1cd35cb9a8a7b2f48880beb53f3bee3842de2d74bcadd45c7b05c13ff04203
Currently test runner doesn't execute the unit tests of the ripemd160
module, so add it to the list. All other framework modules that contain
unit tests are included, as can be easily checked via
`git grep unittest.TestCase ./test/functional/test_framework/`
This is a late follow-up to PR #23716 (commit
ad3e9e1f21).
Included a test that checks if an invalid first argument is entered we
receive a rpc error. The rpc should fail if "start", "status" or "abort"
is not the first command.
8f14fc8622 test: cover fastprune with excessive block size (Matthew Zipkin)
271c23e87f blockstorage: Adjust fastprune limit if block exceeds blockfile size (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
The debug-only `-fastprune` option used in several tests is not always safe to use:
If a `-fastprune` node receives a block larger than the maximum blockfile size of `64kb` bad things happen: The while loop in `BlockManager::FindBlockPos` never terminates, and the node runs oom because memory for `m_blockfile_info` is allocated in each iteration of the loop.
The same would happen if a naive user used `-fastprune` on anything other than regtest (so this can be tested by syncing on signet for example, the first block that crashes the node is at height 2232).
Change the approach by raising the blockfile size to the size of the block, if that block otherwise wouldn't fit (idea by TheCharlatan).
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 8f14fc8622. Added new assert, test, and comment since last review
TheCharlatan:
ACK 8f14fc8622
pinheadmz:
ACK 8f14fc8622
Tree-SHA512: df2fea30613ef9d40ebbc2416eacb574f6d7d96847db5c33dda22a29a2c61a8db831aa9552734ea4477e097f253dbcb6dcb1395d43d2a090cc0588c9ce66eac3
dc14ba08e6 test: remove modinv python util helper function (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Since #27483 was merged the `modinv()` body is just one line calling pythons own implementation of `pow()`. We can just remove the function as it doesn't seem to add any value. Additionally the comment in the function is now outdated and the test is only testing two ways of doing modular inverse but both using python's `pow()` function.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK dc14ba08e6
Tree-SHA512: e8b470c72dc3f9fd53699d0684650517b1ea35ad1d4c01cf9472c80d3e4474c0c72e429c0bd201eb99d204c87eee0d68285e6a388e4c506f30e14b2bff9c1c32
057057a2d7 Add test for `sendmany` rpc that uses `subtractfeefrom` parameter (Yusuf Sahin HAMZA)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test that uses `sendmany` rpc to send **BTC** to multiple addresses using `subtractfeefrom` parameter, then checks receiver addresses balances to make sure fees are subtracted correctly.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 057057a2d7
Tree-SHA512: 51167120d489f0ff7b8b9855424d07cb55a8965984f904643cddf45e7a08c350eaded498c350ec9c660edf72c2f128ec142347c9c79d5043d9f6cd481b15cd7e
9c18992bba test: add coverage for `-bantime` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for `-bantime`. This flag sets the time in seconds how long the IP is banned (in the case you don't explicitly set `bantime` when using `setban`).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 9c18992bba
Tree-SHA512: e95f8608aa5df9b09cc5577daae662ed79ef5d5c69ee5e704d7c69520b9b51cc142e9e6be69d80356eda25a5215c4770b1a208638560c48cd3bc8f6d195a371f
b922f6b526 rpc: scanblocks, add "completed" flag to the result obj (furszy)
ce50acc54f rpc: scanblocks, do not traverse the whole chain block by block (furszy)
Pull request description:
Coming from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23549#pullrequestreview-1105712566
The current `scanblocks` flow walks-through every block in the active chain
until hits the chain tip or processes 10k blocks, then calls `lookupFilterRange`
function to obtain all filters from that particular range.
This is only done to obtain the heights range to look up the block
filters. Which is unneeded.
As `scanblocks` only lookup block filters in the active chain, we can
directly calculate the lookup range heights, by using the chain tip,
without requiring to traverse the chain block by block.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK b922f6b526
TheCharlatan:
ACK b922f6b526
Tree-SHA512: 0587e6d9cf87a59184adb2dbc26a4e2bce3a16233594c6c330f69feb49bf7dc63fdacf44fc20308e93441159ebc604c63eb7de19204d3e745a2ff16004892b45
be72663a15 test: bumpfee, add coverage for "send coins back to yourself" (furszy)
7bffec6715 bumpfee: enable send coins back to yourself (furszy)
Pull request description:
Simple example:
1) User_1 sends 0.1 btc to user_2 on a low fee transaction.
2) After few hours, the tx is still in the mempool, user_2
is not interested anymore, so user_1 decides to cancel
it by sending coins back to himself.
3) User_1 has the bright idea of opening the explorer and
copy the change output address of the transaction. Then
call bumpfee providing such output (in the "outputs" arg).
Currently, this is not possible. The wallet fails with
"Unable to create transaction. Transaction must have at least
one recipient" error.
The error reason is because we discard the provided output
from the recipients list and set it inside the coin control
so the process adds it later (when the change is calculated).
But.. there is no later if the tx has no outputs.
ACKs for top commit:
ishaanam:
reACK be72663a15
achow101:
ACK be72663a15
Tree-SHA512: c2c38290a998f9b426a830d9624c7feb730158980ac186f8fb0138d5e200935d6538307bc60a2c3d0b7b6ee2b4ffb77a1e98baf8feb1d20a7d825f6055ac377f
9141e4395a rpc, docs: Add note for commands that supports only legacy wallets (Yusuf Sahin HAMZA)
Pull request description:
Refs #25363, apparently issue is not updated since over a month, so i decided to put the same `importaddress` note in #25368 to other rpc commands that needs this note.
Note is added for following commands:
- `importprivkey`
- `importpubkey`
- `importwallet`
- `dumpprivkey`
- `dumpwallet`
- `importmulti`
- `addmultisigaddress`
- `sethdseed`
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 9141e4395a
Tree-SHA512: f3dc05d26577fd8dbe2bd69cb5c14ffccebacd6010402af44427b3d01be8484895dfcf33d55dfa766eadb7f9f3bae5cc4c2add3ac816a2ac60e8beb5a97527f3
a5986e82dd refactor: Remove CAddressBookData::destdata (Ryan Ofsky)
5938ad0bdb wallet: Add DatabaseBatch::ErasePrefix method (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
This is cleanup that doesn't change external behavior. Benefits of the cleanup are:
- Removes awkward `StringMap` intermediate representation for wallet address metadata.
- Simplifies `CWallet`, deals with used address and received request serialization in `walletdb.cpp` instead of higher level wallet code
- Adds test coverage and documentation
This PR doesn't change externally observable behavior. Internally, the only change in behavior is that `EraseDestData` deletes rows directly from the database because they are no longer stored in memory. This is more direct and efficient because it uses a single lookup and scan instead of multiple lookups.
Motivation for this cleanup is making changes like #18550, #18192, #13756 easier to reason about and less likely to result in unintended behavior and bugs
---
This PR is a rebased copy of #18608. For some reason that PR is locked and couldn't be reopened or commented on.
This PR is an alternative to #27215 with differences described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27215#pullrequestreview-1329028143
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK a5986e82dd
furszy:
Code ACK a5986e82
Tree-SHA512: 6bd3e402f1f60263fbd433760bdc29d04175ddaf8307207c4a67d59f6cffa732e176ba57886e02926f7a1615dce0ed9cda36c8cbc6430aa8e5b56934c23f3fe7
To tell the user whether the process was aborted or not.
Plus, as the process can be aborted prior to the end range,
have also changed the "to_height" result value to return the
last scanned block instead of the end range block.
The current flow walks-through every block in the active chain until
hits the chain tip or processes 10k blocks, then calls
`lookupFilterRange()` to obtain all the filters from that
particular range.
This is only done to obtain the heights range to look up the block
filters. Which is unneeded.
As `scanblocks` only lookup block filters in the active chain, we can
directly calculate the lookup range heights, by using the chain tip,
without requiring to traverse the chain block by block.
