88df300f20 qt: Do not translate file extensions (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
File extensions are untranslatable by their nature.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Concept and code review ACK 88df300f20
Talkless:
tACK 88df300f20, tested on Debian Sid with Qt 5.15.2. Tested all filters except for .psbt.
jarolrod:
re-ACK 88df300f20
Tree-SHA512: 104d383543edcee8fb825f98d3b6669a7aaae2c74b6602f9bc407bf1c88be121ec535f2f9be87afa6ca775dc79865165f620553f6f6ab1d31a3f9ea93f7f9593
8f9644890a qt: Remove Transactionview Edit Label Action (Jarol Rodriguez)
Pull request description:
This PR removes the `Edit Label` action from the `transactionview` context menu. Since the `Edit Label` action will no longer be utilized in the `transactionview`, the `Edit Label` function logic is also removed.
| Master | PR |
| ----------- | ----------- |
|<img width="248" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-17 at 8 34 34 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108292189-9b86c800-7161-11eb-9e80-6238523bc27e.png">|<img width="248" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-17 at 8 35 10 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108292204-a17ca900-7161-11eb-8582-7f33d3e2ba8f.png">|
Among the context menu actions for each transaction in the `transactionview` is the `Edit Label` action.
While all other actions apply directly to the selected transaction, the `Edit Label` action applies to the selected transaction's address. As documented in issue #209 and [#1168](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/1168) , this is an "unfortunate" placement for such an action. The current placement creates a confusing UX scenario where the outcome of the action is ambiguous.
**Example of Ambiguous Behavior:**
The context menu gives the wrong impression that the `Edit Label` action will edit a `Label` for the specific transaction that has been right-clicked on. This impression can be because all other actions in this menu will relate to the specific transaction and the misconception between `Comment` and `Label`.
<img width="1062" alt="editlabel-start" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108296385-6da48200-7167-11eb-89f0-b21ccc58f6f4.png">
Let's say I wanted to give the transaction selected in the screenshot above a comment of "2-17[17:43]". Given all the context clues, it will be reasonable to assume that the `Edit Label` function will give a label to this transaction. Instead, it edits the `Label` for the address behind this transaction. Thus, changing the `Label` for all transactions associated with this address.
<img width="971" alt="editlabel-end" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108297179-e35d1d80-7168-11eb-86a9-0d2796c51829.png">
**Maintaining `Edit Label` Functionality:**
The action of Editing a Label should instead be reserved for the respective address tables of the `Send` and `Receive` tabs. As documented in this [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/209#issuecomment-780922101), `Edit Label` is currently implemented in the `Send` tab and is missing in the `Receive` tab. A follow-up PR can add the `Edit Label` functionality to the `Receive` tab.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 8f9644890a
Talkless:
tACK 8f9644890a, tested on Debian Sid.
Tree-SHA512: 70bbcc8be3364b0d4f476a9760aa14ad1ad1f53b0b130ce0ffe75190d76c386e6e26c530c0a55d1742402fe2b45c68a2af6dbfaf58ee9909ad93b06f0b6559d4
Among the context menu actions for each transaction in the transactionview is the 'Edit Label' action.
While all other actions apply directly to the selected transaction, the 'Edit Label' action applies to the address of the selected transaction. This creates a confusing UX scenario where the outcome of the action is ambiguous. The action of Editing a Label should instead be reserved for the Send and Receive tabs.
This PR removes the 'Edit Label' action from the transactionview context menu. Since the 'Edit Label' action will no longer be utilized in the transactionview, the 'Edit Label' function logic is also removed.
In Qt 5 the last column resizing with dragging its left edge works
out-of-the-box.
The current TableViewLastColumnResizingFixer implementation could put
the last column content out of the view port and confuse a user.
d795c610d3 [qt] TransactionView: highlight replacement tx after fee bump (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Consistent with #12421 which highlights the transaction after send.
<img width="747" alt="1" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/38036280-a7358ea4-32a6-11e8-8f92-417e9e1e3e8b.png">
<img width="685" alt="2" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/38036289-aac87040-32a6-11e8-9f94-81745ff6c592.png">
~I'm not too proud of the `QTimer::singleShot(10` bit; any suggestions on how to properly wait for the transactions table to become aware of the new transaction?~
Although I could have called `focusTransaction()` directly from `TransactionView::bumpFee()` I'm using the same signal as the send screen. This should make it easier to move fee bump / transaction replacement functionality around later.
Tree-SHA512: 242055b7c3d32c7b2cf871f5ceda2581221902fd53fa29e0b092713fc16d3191adbe8cbb28417d522dda9febec8cc05e07afe3489cd7caaecd33460c1dde6fbc
9ad6746ccd Use static_cast instead of C-style casts for non-fundamental types (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
A C-style cast is equivalent to try casting in the following order:
1. `const_cast(...)`
2. `static_cast(...)`
3. `const_cast(static_cast(...))`
4. `reinterpret_cast(...)`
5. `const_cast(reinterpret_cast(...))`
By using `static_cast<T>(...)` explicitly we avoid the possibility of an unintentional and dangerous `reinterpret_cast`. Furthermore `static_cast<T>(...)` allows for easier grepping of casts.
For a more thorough discussion, see ["ES.49: If you must use a cast, use a named cast"](https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#es49-if-you-must-use-a-cast-use-a-named-cast) in the C++ Core Guidelines (Stroustrup & Sutter).
Tree-SHA512: bd6349b7ea157da93a47b8cf238932af5dff84731374ccfd69b9f732fabdad1f9b1cdfca67497040f14eaa85346391404f4c0495e22c467f26ca883cd2de4d3c
6dda059bd [qt] Simplifies boolean expression model && model->haveWatchOnly() (251)
Pull request description:
This PR optimizes the boolean expression `model && model->haveWatchOnly()` to `model->haveWatchOnly()`.
The boolean expression can be optimized because the method `TransactionView::exportClicked` already guards against a potential dereferenced null pointer by returning early if `model` is null.
63a4dc1087/src/qt/transactionview.cpp (L351-L353)
Tree-SHA512: 8bdd0d05bf879745fa39d3ca7524471720ae08ceee9427d5a08776e7b56d18542ae87a6991cd6779e232305f504fdfc77223702b72ecbe231f5f5e98453456dd
The boolean expression model && model->haveWatchOnly() can be simplified to model->haveWatchOnly(), because if (!model || !model->getOptionsModel()) { return; } guards against a potential dereferenced null pointer.
a720b92 Remove includes in .cpp files for things the corresponding .h file already included (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Remove includes in .cpp files for things the corresponding .h file already included.
Example case:
* `addrdb.cpp` includes `addrdb.h` and `fs.h`
* `addrdb.h` includes `fs.h`
Then remove the direct inclusion of `fs.h` in `addrman.cpp` and rely on the indirect inclusion of `fs.h` via the included `addrdb.h`.
In line with the header include guideline (see #10575).
Tree-SHA512: 8704b9de3011a4c234db336a39f7d2c139e741cf0f7aef08a5d3e05197e1e18286b863fdab25ae9638af4ff86b3d52e5cab9eed66bfa2476063aa5c79f9b0346
A C-style cast is equivalent to try casting in the following order:
1. const_cast(...)
2. static_cast(...)
3. const_cast(static_cast(...))
4. reinterpret_cast(...)
5. const_cast(reinterpret_cast(...))
By using static_cast<T>(...) explicitly we avoid the possibility
of an unintentional and dangerous reinterpret_cast. Furthermore
static_cast<T>(...) allows for easier grepping of casts.
A few code changes were needed to accompany the test:
* Adding setObjectName() calls for a few Qt controls to make them easily
accessible from the test.
* Calling contextMenu->popup() instead of contextMenu->exec() to open
the transaction list context menu without blocking the test thread.
* Opening the context menu at the contextualMenu event point rather than
the cursor position (this change was not strictly needed to make the test
work, but is more correct).
* Updating the bumped transaction row with showTransaction=true instead of
false. This is needed to prevent the bumped tx from being hidden, so the last
part of the test which attempts to bump the bumped tx can work. (Technically
this change is a more general bugfix not limited to the testing environment,
but the bug doesn't happen outside of the testing environment because in the
full Qt client, a queued NotifyTransactionChanged notification causes the row
to be updated twice, first with showTransaction=false, then immediately after
with showTransaction=true.)
