fae44c83da test: Remove 0.16.3 test from wallet_backwards_compatibility.py (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The test checks that any wallet created with current master can not be loaded with `v0.16.3`. This is interesting documentation, however it is probably not something to keep as a test, because:
* It seems like an extremely unlikely (and unsupported) edge case that someone creates a wallet with master and then goes ahead to open it with a long EOL software version.
* A better test would be the inverse: Create a wallet with `v0.16.3` and open it with current master. This is already tested in `wallet_upgradewallet.py`, where I've added an additional balance check before upgrading the `v0.16.3` wallet.
* The test is intermittently failing when shutting down the `v0.16.3` node, for example in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30875#issuecomment-2357565564. The exact cause is unclear, but given that the test isn't worthy to keep, removing it will ensure that the error disappears.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK fae44c83da
fanquake:
ACK fae44c83da - I agree that test seems to have past it's usefulness, and the fact that it otherwise causes intemittent issues is further reason to remove it.
Tree-SHA512: 85bf428e616e0880198c1a7529936520505d7fa87c2eeb87a0457f13b50a163accaf5f80f9364dea978f6bd14b0b5350cda88f49aa7584682c8b5e0b0b117724
fa6d14eacb test: Treat exclude list warning as failure in CI (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
An outdated exclude list or otherwise an error in the exclude list handling is usually a bug.
So make it fatal in the CI, instead of silently ignoring it.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30872/files#r1757015334
Can be tested with something like (with and without `--ci`):
```
./bld-cmake/test/functional/test_runner.py wallet_disable -x wallet_disablee
ACKs for top commit:
tdb3:
ACK fa6d14eacb
ismaelsadeeq:
utACK fa6d14eacb
Tree-SHA512: 03a70dff9d1272d982591d60ab764f9233d4802488bc1bad305a2755e2d7ed86e691ee94767a3bc5f68321b63214aba44e6f9edd1543dfad7a20f9397cf78734
98c1536852 test: add getorphantxs tests (tdb3)
93f48fceb7 test: add tx_in_orphanage() (tdb3)
34a9c10e8c rpc: add getorphantxs (tdb3)
f511ff3654 refactor: move verbosity parsing to rpc/util (tdb3)
532491faf1 net: add GetOrphanTransactions() to PeerManager (tdb3)
91b65adff2 refactor: add OrphanTxBase for external use (tdb3)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a new hidden rpc, `getorphantxs`, that provides the caller with a list of orphan transactions. This rpc may be helpful when checking orphan behavior/scenarios (e.g. in tests like `p2p_orphan_handling`) or providing additional data for statistics/visualization.
```
getorphantxs ( verbosity )
Shows transactions in the tx orphanage.
EXPERIMENTAL warning: this call may be changed in future releases.
Arguments:
1. verbosity (numeric, optional, default=0) 0 for an array of txids (may contain duplicates), 1 for an array of objects with tx details, and 2 for details from (1) and tx hex
Result (for verbose = 0):
[ (json array)
"hex", (string) The transaction hash in hex
...
]
Result (for verbose = 1):
[ (json array)
{ (json object)
"txid" : "hex", (string) The transaction hash in hex
"wtxid" : "hex", (string) The transaction witness hash in hex
"bytes" : n, (numeric) The serialized transaction size in bytes
"vsize" : n, (numeric) The virtual transaction size as defined in BIP 141. This is different from actual serialized size for witness transactions as witness data is discounted.
"weight" : n, (numeric) The transaction weight as defined in BIP 141.
"expiration" : xxx, (numeric) The orphan expiration time expressed in UNIX epoch time
"from" : [ (json array)
n, (numeric) Peer ID
...
]
},
...
]
Result (for verbose = 2):
[ (json array)
{ (json object)
"txid" : "hex", (string) The transaction hash in hex
"wtxid" : "hex", (string) The transaction witness hash in hex
"bytes" : n, (numeric) The serialized transaction size in bytes
"vsize" : n, (numeric) The virtual transaction size as defined in BIP 141. This is different from actual serialized size for witness transactions as witness data is discounted.
"weight" : n, (numeric) The transaction weight as defined in BIP 141.
"expiration" : xxx, (numeric) The orphan expiration time expressed in UNIX epoch time
"from" : [ (json array)
n, (numeric) Peer ID
...
],
"hex" : "hex" (string) The serialized, hex-encoded transaction data
},
...
]
Examples:
> bitcoin-cli getorphantxs 2
> curl --user myusername --data-binary '{"jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": "curltest", "method": "getorphantxs", "params": [2]}' -H 'content-type: application/json' http://127.0.0.1:8332/
```
```
$ build/src/bitcoin-cli getorphantxs 2
[
{
"txid": "50128aac5deab548228d74d846675ad4def91cd92453d81a2daa778df12a63f2",
"wtxid": "bb61659336f59fcf23acb47c05dc4bbea63ab533a98c412f3a12cb813308d52c",
"bytes": 133,
"vsize": 104,
"weight": 415,
"expiration": 1725663854,
"from": [
1
],
"hex": "020000000001010b992959eaa2018bbf31a4a3f9aa30896a8144dbd5cfaf263bf07c0845a3a6620000000000000000000140fe042a010000002251202913b252fe537830f843bfdc5fa7d20ba48639a87c86ff837b92d083c55ad7c102015121c0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000100000000"
},
{
"txid": "330bb7f701604a40ade20aa129e9a3eb8a7bf024e599084ca1026d3222b9f8a1",
"wtxid": "b7651f7d4c1a40c4d01f6a1e43a121967091fa0f56bb460146c1c5c068e824f6",
"bytes": 133,
"vsize": 104,
"weight": 415,
"expiration": 1725663854,
"from": [
2
],
"hex": "020000000001013600adfe41e0ebd2454838963d270916d2b47239c9eebb93a992b720d3589a080000000000000000000140fe042a010000002251202913b252fe537830f843bfdc5fa7d20ba48639a87c86ff837b92d083c55ad7c102015121c0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000100000000"
}
]
```
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
reACK 98c1536852
hodlinator:
re-ACK 98c1536852
danielabrozzoni:
ACK 98c1536852
pablomartin4btc:
tACK 98c1536852
itornaza:
reACK 98c1536852
Tree-SHA512: 66075f9faa83748350b87397302100d08af92cbef5fadb27f2b4903f028c08020bf34a23e17262b41abb3f379ca9f46cf6cd5459b8681f2b83bffbbaf3c03ff9
fa2b7d8d6b Remove redundant unterminated-logprintf tidy check (MarcoFalke)
bbbb2e43ee log: Enforce trailing newline, Remove redundant m_started_new_line (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
There are many problems around missing a trailing newline while logging:
* All log lines are currently terminated by a trailing newline. This means any runtime code trying to handle a "missing" newline is currently dead code.
* Leaving a line unterminated is racy and can cause content corruption by mixing log lines from different sources.
* It requires extra code like `m_started_new_line` to keep track of, which is annoying and pointless to maintain, because it is currently dead code, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30386#discussion_r1684380835.
* It requires a standalone `unterminated-logprintf` clang-tidy plugin, which is unmaintained (no one updated it for the new log function names), probably harder to maintain than normal C++ code (because it requires clang AST matcher knowledge), brittle (it can fail to detect issues at any time, if it goes out-of-sync, or be explicitly disabled via `NOLINT`), and annoying for devs (it is slow and intricate to run locally and thus only effectively run on CI or via the CI scripts).
Fix all issues by enforcing the trailing newline in logs directly in the code. Then remove all the other stuff.
This refactor does not change behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK fa2b7d8d6b
achow101:
ACK fa2b7d8d6b
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa2b7d8d6b. Just comment and test cleanup since last review
Tree-SHA512: 10ed420f6c2fdb0f491d6c880be8dd2e8beef628f510adebadf4c3849d9f5e28906519d5cbaeb295f4c7c1b07c4c88a9905b3cfe30fee3a2c91ac9fd24ae6755
The weight unit is merely a consensus rule detail and is largely
irrelevant for fee-rate calculations and mempool policy rules (e.g. for
package relay and TRUC limits), so there doesn't seem to be any value of
using a granularity that we can't even guarantee to reach exactly
anyway.
Switch to the more natural unit of vsize instead, which simplifies both
the padding implementation and the current tests that take use of this
padding. The rather annoying multiplications by `WITNESS_SCALE_FACTOR`
can then be removed and weird-looking magic numbers like `4004` can be
replaced by numbers that are more connected to actual policy limit
constants from the codebase, e.g. `1001` for exceeding
`TRUC_CHILD_MAX_VSIZE` by one.
f5a2000579 test: re-bucket long-running tests (willcl-ark)
Pull request description:
Re-bucket:
- `p2p_node_network_limited -v*transport`
- `feature_assume_utxo`
On CI runners these tests are taking longer than their current bucket suggests, often being among the last to finish.
Re-bucket them to improve CI efficiency.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK f5a2000579
Tree-SHA512: 3da5c888db64a311276338270ba1dcad3eb2a24e205f6bb86fc92f767ecfa63682f13fafffff569fa0cfaea607ccb538f31e3934a086d482c3fe1be5d39f8791
faf801515f test: Add missing sync_mempools() to fill_mempool() (MarcoFalke)
fa48be6f02 test: Refactor fill_mempool to extract send_batch helper (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Not doing the sync will lead to (intermittent) issues, as explained in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30922#issuecomment-2364529013.
Fix all issues by doing the sync by default and disable it in places that do not need the sync.
Fixes#30922
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Tested ACK faf801515f
ismaelsadeeq:
Tested ACK faf801515f
marcofleon:
Tested ACK faf801515f
Tree-SHA512: 2de62d168cbb6857a9fb8bc12c42a9093fedf5e9beb6f83a32b3fa72a5ba3cf03631055fd25ef553399a27a6fe0d71c44cfe60660a4d31986debd13b8ab00228
f20fe33e94 test: Add basic balance coverage to wallet_assumeutxo.py (Fabian Jahr)
037b101e80 test: Add coverage for best block locator write in wallet_backup (Fabian Jahr)
31c0df0389 wallet: migration, write best locator before unloading wallet (furszy)
7e3dbe4180 wallet: Write best block to disk before backup (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
I discovered that we don't write the best block to disk when trying to explain the behavior described here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30455#discussion_r1719951882
In the context of that test, the behavior is confusing and I think it also shows that one of the already existing tests in `wallet_assumeutxo.py` doesn't actually test what it says. It only fails because the best block isn't written and actually, the height of the backup that is loaded is at the snapshot height during backup. So it really shouldn't fail since it's past the background sync blocks already.
I'm not sure if this is super relevant in practice though so I am first looking for concept ACKs on the `BackupWallet` code change. Either way, I think this behavior should be documented better if it is left as is and the test should be changed.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK f20fe33e94
furszy:
ACK f20fe33
Tree-SHA512: bb384a940df5c942fffe2eb06314ade4fc5d9b924012bfef3b1c456c4182a30825d1e137d8ae561d93d3a8a2f4d1c1ffe568132d20fa7d04844f1e289ab4a28b
7942951e3f Remove unused g_best_block (Ryan Ofsky)
e3a560ca68 rpc: use waitTipChanged for longpoll (Ryan Ofsky)
460687a09c Remove unused CRPCSignals (Sjors Provoost)
dca923150e Replace RPCNotifyBlockChange with waitTipChanged() (Sjors Provoost)
2a40ee1121 rpc: check for negative timeout arg in waitfor* (Sjors Provoost)
de7c855b3a rpc: recommend -rpcclienttimeout=0 for waitfor* (Sjors Provoost)
77ec072925 rpc: fix waitfornewblock description (Sjors Provoost)
285fe9fb51 rpc: add test for waitforblock and waitfornewblock (Sjors Provoost)
b94b27cf05 Add waitTipChanged to Mining interface (Sjors Provoost)
7eccdaf160 node: Track last block that received a blockTip notification (Sjors Provoost)
ebb8215f23 Rename getTipHash() to getTip() and return BlockRef (Sjors Provoost)
89a8f74bbb refactor: rename BlockKey to BlockRef (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
This continues the work in #30200 so that a future Stratum v2 Template Provider (see #29432) can avoid accessing node internals. It needs to know when a new block arrives in order to push new templates to connected clients.
`waitTipChanged()` uses a new kernel notification `notifications().m_tip_block_mutex`, which this PR also introduces (a previous version used `g_best_block`).
In order to ensure the new method works as intended, the `waitfornewblock`, `waitforblock` and `waitforblockheight` RPC methods are refactored to use it. This allows removing `RPCNotifyBlockChange`.
There's a commit to add (direct) tests for the methods that are about to be refactored:
- `waitfornewblock` was already implicitly tested by `feature_shutdown.py`.
- `waitforblockheight` by `feature_coinstatsindex.py` and `example_test.py`
This PR renames `getTipHash()` to `getTip()` and returns a `BlockRef` (renamed from `BlockKey`) so that callers can use either the height or hash.
The later commits make trivial improvements to the `waitfor*` RPC calls (not needed for this PR).
The `waitTipChanged()` method could probably also be used for the longpoll functionality in `getblocktemplate`, but I'm a bit reluctant to touch that.
`RPCServer::OnStarted` no longer does anything and `RPCServer::OnStopped` merely prints a log statement. They were added in #5711 as a refactor. This PR drops them entirely.
Finally `g_best_block` is also dropped.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 7942951e3f
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 7942951e3f. Just rebased since last review
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK 7942951e3f
Tree-SHA512: a5559446b4000c95e07aad33284b7ee2e57aafd87e1ae778b3825d59689566d047a8047e47a10f76e6e341e7dc72fd265a65afbc0a9c011d17c4cafd55031837
- p2p_node_network_limited -v*transport
- feature_assume_utxo
On CI runners these tests are taking longer than their current bucket
suggests, often being among the last to finish.
Re-bucket them to improve CI efficiency.
e6994efe08 fix: increase rpcbind check robustness (tdb3)
d38e3aed89 fix: handle invalid rpcbind port earlier (tdb3)
83b67f2e6d refactor: move host/port checking (tdb3)
73c243965a test: add tests for invalid rpcbind ports (tdb3)
Pull request description:
Previously, when an invalid port was specified in `-rpcbind`, the `SplitHostPort()` return value in `HTTPBindAddresses()` was ignored and attempt would be made to bind to the default rpcbind port (with the host/port treated as a host).
This rearranges port checking code in `AppInitMain()` to handle the invalid port before reaching `HTTPBindAddresses()`. Also adds a check in `HTTPBindAddresses()` as a defensive measure for future changes.
Adds then updates associated functional tests as well.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e6994efe08
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK e6994efe08
zaidmstrr:
Code review ACK [e6994ef](e6994efe08)
Tree-SHA512: bcc3e5ceef21963821cd16ce6ecb83d5c5657755882c05872a7cfe661a1492b1d631f54de22f41fdd173512d62dd15dc37e394fe1a7abe4de484b82cd2438b92
54227e681a rpc, cli: improve error message on multiwallet mode (pablomartin4btc)
Pull request description:
Running a CLI command when multiple wallets are loaded and `-rpcwallet` is not specified, should return a clearer error.
Currently in `master`:
```
$ bitcoin-cli -regtest -generate 1
error code: -19
error message:
Wallet file not specified (must request wallet RPC through /wallet/<filename> uri-path).
Try adding "-rpcwallet=<filename>" option to bitcoin-cli command line.
```
With this change:
```
$ bitcoin-cli -regtest -generate 1
error code: -19
error message:
Multiple wallets are loaded. Please select which wallet to use by requesting the RPC through the /wallet/<walletname> URI path. Or for the CLI, specify the "-rpcwallet=<walletname>" option before the command (run "bitcoin-cli -h" for help or "bitcoin-cli listwallets" to see which wallets are currently loaded).
```
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK 54227e681a
achow101:
ACK 54227e681a
furszy:
utACK 54227e681a
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 54227e681a
jonatack:
ACK 54227e681a
Tree-SHA512: 51ff24f64858aa6be6adf6f20105c9f076ebea743780bf2a4399f7fe8b5239cbb1ea06d32b2ef5e850da2369abb0ef7a52c50c2b8f31f4ca90d3a486abc9b77e
facbcd4cef log: Use ConstevalFormatString (MarcoFalke)
fae9b60c4f test: Use LogPrintStr to test m_log_sourcelocations (MarcoFalke)
fa39b1ca63 doc: move-only logging warning (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This changes all logging (including the wallet logging) to produce a
`ConstevalFormatString` at compile time, so that the format string can be
validated at compile-time.
I tested with `clang` and found that the compiler will use less than 1% more of time and memory.
When an error is found, the compile-time error depends on the compiler, but it may look similar to:
```
src/util/string.h: In function ‘int main(int, char**)’:
src/bitcoind.cpp:265:5: in ‘constexpr’ expansion of ‘util::ConstevalFormatString<1>(((const char*)"Hi %s %s"))’
src/util/string.h:38:98: in ‘constexpr’ expansion of ‘util::ConstevalFormatString<1>::Detail_CheckNumFormatSpecifiers(std::basic_string_view<char>(((const char*)((util::ConstevalFormatString<1>*)this)->util::ConstevalFormatString<1>::fmt)))’
src/util/string.h:78:34: error: expression ‘<throw-expression>’ is not a constant expression
78 | if (num_params != count) throw "Format specifier count must match the argument count!";
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
This refactor does not change behavior of the compiled executables.
ACKs for top commit:
hodlinator:
re-ACK facbcd4cef
l0rinc:
ACK facbcd4cef
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK facbcd4cef
pablomartin4btc:
re-ACK facbcd4cef
stickies-v:
Approach ACK and code LGTM facbcd4cef modulo a `tinyformat::format_error` concern.
Tree-SHA512: 852f74d360897020f0d0f6e5064edc5e7f7dacc2bec1d5feff22c634a2fcd2eb535aa75be0b7191d9053728be6108484c737154b02d68ad3186a2e5544ba0db8
a9964c0444 doc: Updating docs from autotools to cmake (kevkevinpal)
Pull request description:
A bit of a followup from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30840
- In this change the documentation where we refer to the `./configure` script which is now gone and have converted the configure params to use the `cmake` equivalent.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
ACK a9964c0444
jonatack:
utACK a9964c0444
jarolrod:
ACK a9964c0444
tdb3:
ACK a9964c0444
pablomartin4btc:
re-ACK a9964c0444
Tree-SHA512: f7ed20b8ad61f028c0d242b9cc70650d8da63057d4a8f7da88f0117a8d3241c5fe8fcf19d56ec82088160b9fee9b175fe9f64e5a845260d3696dc7e94bfdd0bd
replaced --enable-debug with -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug in developer-notes
replaced --enable-multiprocess with -DWITH_MULTIPROCESS=ON
replaced --disable-zmq with -DWITH_ZMQ=OFF
Previously, when an invalid port was specified
in `-rpcbind`, the `SplitHostPort()` return value
in `HTTPBindAddresses()` was ignored and attempt
would be made to bind to the default rpcbind port
(with the host/port treated as a host).
This rearranges port checking code in
`AppInitMain()` to handle the invalid
port before reaching `HTTPBindAddresses()`.
Also adjusts associated functional tests.
The primary objective is to provide users with clearer
and more informative error messages when encountering
the RPC_WALLET_NOT_SPECIFIED error, which occurs when
multiple wallets are loadad.
This commit also rectifies the error message consistency
by bringing the error message in line with the definition
established in protocol.h ("error when there are multiple
wallets loaded").
This changes all logging (including the wallet logging) to produce a
ConstevalFormatString at compile time, so that the format string can be
validated at compile-time.
Also, while touching the wallet logging, avoid a copy of the template
Params by using const Params&.
6a1aa510e3 rpc: check block index before reading block / undo data (Martin Zumsande)
6cbf2e5f81 rpc: Improve gettxoutproof error when only header is available. (Martin Zumsande)
69fc867ea1 test: add coverage to getblock and getblockstats (Martin Zumsande)
5290cbd585 rpc: Improve getblock / getblockstats error when only header is available. (Martin Zumsande)
e5b537bbdf rest: improve error when only header of a block is available. (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
Fixes#20978
If a block was pruned, `getblock` already returns a specific error: "Block not available (pruned data)".
But if we haven't received the full block yet (e.g. in a race with block downloading after a new block was received headers-first, or during IBD) we just return an unspecific "Block not found on disk" error and log
`ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk: OpenBlockFile failed for FlatFilePos(nFile=-1, nPos=0) `
which suggest something went wrong even though this is a completely normal and expected situation.
This PR improves the error message and stops calling `ReadRawBlockFromDisk()`, when we already know from the header that the block is not available on disk.
Similarly, it prevents all other rpcs from calling blockstorage read functions unless we expect the data to be there, so that `LogError()` will only be thrown when there is an actual file system problem.
I'm not completely sure if the cause is important enough to change the wording of the rpc error, that some scripts may rely on.
If reviewers prefer it, an alternative solution would be to keep returning the current "Block not found on disk" error, but return it immediately instead of calling `ReadRawBlockFromDisk`, which would at least prevent the log error and also be an improvement in my opinion.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
re-ACK 6a1aa510e3
achow101:
ACK 6a1aa510e3
andrewtoth:
re-ACK 6a1aa510e3
Tree-SHA512: 491aef880e8298a05841c4bf8eb913ef84820d1ad5415fd17d9b441bff181959ebfdd432b5eb8347dc9c568433f9a2384ca9d84cd72c79d8a58323ca117538fe
72c9a1fe94 test: Check that network stays suspended after dumptxoutset if it was off before (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #30817 which covered the robustness of `dumptxoutset`: network is deactivated during the run but re-activated even when an issue was encountered. But it did not cover the case if the user had deactivated the network themselves before. In that case the user may want the network to stay off so the network is not reactivated after `dumptxoutset` finishes. A test for this behavior is added here.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 72c9a1fe94
pablomartin4btc:
ACK 72c9a1fe94
theStack:
utACK 72c9a1fe94
tdb3:
tested ACK 72c9a1fe94
Tree-SHA512: 18a57c5782e99a018414db0597e88debeb32666712c2a75dddbb55135d8f1ddd1eeacba8bbbd35fc03b6c4ab0522fe074ec08edea729560b018f51efabf00e89
This avoids low-level log errors that are supposed to only occur when
there is an actual problem with the block on disk missing unexpectedly,
but not in the case where the block and/or undo data are expected not to be there.
It changes behavior such that in the first case (block index indicates
data is available but retrieving it fails) an error is thrown.
It also adjusts a functional tests that tried to simulate not
having undo data (but having block data) by deleting the undo file.
This situation should occur reality because block and undo data are pruned together.
Instead, test this situation with a block that hasn't been connected.
This improves the error message of the getblock and getblockstats rpc and prevents calls to
ReadRawBlockFromDisk(), which are unnecessary if we know
from the header nStatus field that the block is not available.
19f4a7c95a test: Wait for local services to update in feature_assumeutxo (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Closes#30878
It seems like there is a race where the block is stored locally and `getblock` does not error anymore, but `ActivateBestChain` has not finished yet, so the local services are not updated yet either. Fix this by waiting for the local services to update.
Can be reproduced locally by adding the sleep here:
```cpp
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
src/validation.cpp:3567: bool Chainstate::ActivateBestChain(BlockValidationState& state, std::shared_ptr< │
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
}
if (WITH_LOCK(::cs_main, return m_disabled)) {
std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::seconds(10));
// Background chainstate has reached the snapshot base block, so exit.
// Restart indexes to resume indexing for all blocks unique to the snapshot
```
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review-only ACK 19f4a7c95a
achow101:
ACK 19f4a7c95a
pablomartin4btc:
tACK 19f4a7c95a
furszy:
Code review ACK [19f4a7c](19f4a7c95a).
Tree-SHA512: 70dad3795988956c5e20f2d2d895fb56c5e3ce257c7547d3fd729c88949f0e24cb34594da1537bce8794ad02b2db44e7e46e995aa32539cd4dd84c4f1d4bb1c4
fa5bc450d5 util: Use compile-time check for LogConnectFailure (MarcoFalke)
fa7087b896 util: Use compile-time check for FatalErrorf (MarcoFalke)
faa62c0112 util: Add ConstevalFormatString (MarcoFalke)
fae7b83eb5 lint: Remove forbidden functions from lint-format-strings.py (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `test/lint/lint-format-strings.py` was designed to count the number of format specifiers and assert that they are equal to the number of parameters passed to the format function. The goal seems reasonable, but the implementation has many problems:
* It is written in Python, meaning that C++ code can not be parsed correctly. Currently it relies on brittle regex and string parsing.
* Apart from the parsing errors, there are also many logic errors. For example, `count_format_specifiers` allows a mix of positional specifiers and non-positional specifiers, which can lead to runtime format bugs. Also, `count_format_specifiers` silently skipped over "special" format specifiers, which are valid in tinyformat, which again can lead to runtime format bugs being undetected.
* The brittle logic has a history of breaking in pull requests that are otherwise fine. This causes the CI to fail and the pull request being blocked from progress until the bug in the linter is fixed, or the code is rewritten to work around the bug.
* It is only run in the CI, or when the developer invokes the script. It would be better if the developer got the error message at compile-time, directly when writing the code.
Fix all issues by using a `consteval` checked format string in `FatalErrorf` and `LogConnectFailure`.
This is the first step toward https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30530 and a follow-up will apply the approach to the other places.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK fa5bc450d5
l0rinc:
ACK fa5bc450d5
hodlinator:
ACK fa5bc450d5
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa5bc450d5
Tree-SHA512: d6189096b16083143687ed1b1559cf4f92f97dd87bc5d00673e44f4fb9fce7bb7b215cfdfc39b6e6a24f0b75a79a03ededce966639e554f7172e1fc22cf015ae
72b46f28bf test: fix exclude parsing for functional runner (Max Edwards)
Pull request description:
This restores previous behaviour of being able to exclude a test by name without having to specify .py extension.
It was noticed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30851 that tests were no longer being excluded.
PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30244 introduced being able to exclude a specific tests based on args (such as `--exclude "rpc_bind.py --ipv6`) but it made the wrong assumption that test names intended to be excluded would include the .py extension.
The following https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30244#issuecomment-2344009687 shows that this is not how the `--exclude` flag was used in CI.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30244#issuecomment-2344009687 gave three examples of `--exclude` being used in CI so I compared the number of tests that the runner would run for these three examples in three situations, before #30244 was introduced, in master today and with this PR applied.
Example:
`--previous-releases --coverage --extended --exclude feature_dbcrash`
Test count:
Before #30244 introduced: 314
Master: 315
With this PR: 314
Example:
`--exclude feature_init,rpc_bind,feature_bind_extra`
Test count:
Before #30244 introduced: 306
Master 311
With this PR: 306
Example:
`--exclude rpc_bind,feature_bind_extra`
Before #30244 introduced: 307
Master 311
With this PR: 307
I've also tested that the functionality introduced with #30244 remains and we can still exclude specific tests by argument.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK 72b46f28bf
willcl-ark:
ACK 72b46f28bf
Tree-SHA512: 37c0e3115f4e3efdf9705f4ff8cd86a5cc906aacc1ab26b0f767f5fb6a953034332b29b0667073f8382a48a2fe9d649b7e60493daf04061260adaa421419d8c8
2ad560139b Remove unused src_dir param from run_tests (Lőrinc)
Pull request description:
The `src_dir` usage was removed in a8a2e364ac (diff-437d7f6e9f2229879b60aae574a8217f14c643bbf3cfa9225d8011d6d52df00cL598), making the parameter unused.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 1fd8b93811b4ab467ba5a160a4fe204e9606e1bf237c7595ed6f8b7821cf59d2a776c0e1e154852a45b2a35e5bdbd8996314e4f63a9c750f21b9a17875cb636a
992f83bb6f test: add coverage for assumeUTXO honest peers disconnection (furszy)
6d5812e5c8 assumeUTXO: fix peers disconnection during sync (furszy)
Pull request description:
Because AssumeUTXO nodes prioritize tip synchronization, they relay their local
address through the network before completing the background chain sync.
This, combined with the advertising of full-node service (`NODE_NETWORK`), can
result in an honest peer in IBD connecting to the AssumeUTXO node (while syncing)
and requesting an historical block the node does not have. This behavior leads to
an abrupt disconnection due to perceived unresponsiveness from the AssumeUTXO
node.
This lack of response occurs because nodes ignore `getdata` requests when they do
not have the block data available (further discussion can be found in #30385).
Fix this by refraining from signaling full-node service support while the
background chain is being synced. During this period, the node will only
signal `NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED` support. Then, full-node (`NODE_NETWORK`)
support will be re-enabled once the background chain sync is completed.
Thanks mzumsande for a post-#30385 convo too.
Testing notes:
Just cherry-pick the second commit (bb08c22) on master.
It will fail there, due to the IBD node requesting historical blocks to the snapshot
node - which is bad because the snapshot node will ignore the requests and
stall + disconnect after some time.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 992f83bb6f
naumenkogs:
ACK 992f83bb6f
mzumsande:
ACK 992f83bb6f
Tree-SHA512: fef525d1cf3200c2dd89a346be9c82d77f2e28ddaaea1f490a435e180d1a47a371cadea508349777d740ab56e94be536ad8f7d61cc81f6550c58b609b3779ed3
