as BIP339 currently states:
"The wtxidrelay message MUST be sent in response to a version
message from a peer whose protocol version is >= 70016 and
prior to sending a verack. A wtxidrelay message received after
a verack message MUST be ignored or treated as invalid."
1816327e53 p2p: Put disconnecting logs into BCLog::NET category (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
It's too noisy:
```
$ cat debug.log | wc -l
28529
$ cat debug.log | grep "Disconnecting and discouraging peer" | wc -l
10177
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
noban, addnode and local peers are still unconditionally logged (as they should), but this one can go into a category, so cr-ACK 1816327e53
practicalswift:
ACK 1816327e53 for the reasons MarcoFalke gave above.
ajtowns:
ACK 1816327e53
Tree-SHA512: c312c1009090840659b2cb1364d8ad9b6ab8e742fc462aef169996d93c76c248507639a00257ed9d73a6916c01176b1793491b2305e92fdded5f9de0935b6ba6
This behavior was apparently inadvertently broken in 5400ef6; without this
change our daily self-announcements frequently go unsent, because our
address is still in the peer's rolling bloom filter (for potentially many
days, depending on addr traffic).
0bfce9dc46 [addrman] Fix Connected() comment (John Newbery)
eefe194718 [net] Consolidate logic around calling CAddrMan::Connected() (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Currently, the logic around whether we called CAddrMan::Connected() for
a peer is spread between verack processing (where we discard inbound
peers) and FinalizeNode (where we discard misbehaving and
block-relay-only peers). Consolidate that logic to a single place.
Also remove the CNode.fCurrentlyConnected bool, which is now
redundant. We can rely on CNode.fSuccessfullyConnected, since the two
bools were only ever flipped to true in the same place.
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code review ACK 0bfce9dc46
amitiuttarwar:
code review ACK 0bfce9dc46. nice tidy, and bonus that we get to remove an unnecessary call to `cs_main`
Tree-SHA512: 1ab74dae3bc12a6846da57c853033e546bb4f91caa39f4c50bf0cf7eca59cb917bdb2ef795da55363e7e9f70949cb28bb3be004cb3afa4389f970d2fe097d932
Sending a version message after the intial version message is peer
misbehavior. Though, it seems arbitrary and confusing to disconnect only
after exactly 100 version messages. Duplicate version messages affect us
no different than any other unknown message. So remove the Misbehaving
and ignore the redundant msgs.
Sending a non-version message before the initial version message is peer
misbehavior. Though, it seems arbitrary and confusing to disconnect only
after exactly 100 non-version messages. So remove the Misbehaving and
instead rely on the existing disconnect-due-to-handshake-timeout logic.
af3b0dfc54 net: fix output of peer address in version message (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
If `-logips -debug=net` is specified then we print the contents of the
version message we send to the peer, including his address. Because the
addresses in the version message use pre-BIP155 encoding they cannot
represent a Tor v3 address and we would actually send 16 `0`s instead (a
dummy IPv6 address). However we would print the full address in the log
message. Before this fix:
```
2020-10-21T12:24:17Z send version message: version 70016, blocks=653500, us=[::]:0, them=xwjtp3mj427zdp4tljiiivg2l5ijfvmt5lcsfaygtpp6cw254kykvpyd.onion:8333, peer=0
```
This is confusing because we pretend to send one thing while we actually
send another. Adjust the printout to reflect what we are sending. After
this fix:
```
2020-10-21T12:26:54Z send version message: version 70016, blocks=653500, us=[::]:0, them=[::]:0, peer=0
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK af3b0dfc54
jnewbery:
utACK af3b0dfc54
Tree-SHA512: f169d7b4f07c219e541f7c37ea23b82c77e50085fc72ec62f1dd46970389916e177268d07d45c7be94dd209d1903f8f23eaff62b7fa782f6057dd36bb96bba82
Currently, the logic around whether we called CAddrMan::Connected() for
a peer is spread between verack processing (where we discard inbound
peers) and FinalizeNode (where we discard misbehaving and
block-relay-only peers). Consolidate that logic to a single place.
Also remove the CNode.fCurrentlyConnected bool, which is now
redundant. We can rely on CNode.fSuccessfullyConnected, since the two
bools were only ever flipped to true in the same place.
16d9bfc417 Avoid test-before-evict evictions of current peers (Suhas Daftuar)
e8b215a086 Refactor test for existing peer connection into own function (Suhas Daftuar)
4fe338ab3e Call CAddrMan::Good() on block-relay-only peer addresses (Suhas Daftuar)
daf5553126 Avoid calling CAddrMan::Connected() on block-relay-only peer addresses (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
This PR does two things:
* Block-relay-only interaction with addrman.
* Calling `CAddrMan::Connected()` on an address that was a block-relay-only peer causes the time we report in `addr` messages containing that peer to be updated; particularly now that we use anchor connections with a our block-relay-only peers, this risks leaking information about those peers. So, stop this.
* Avoiding calling `CAddrMan::Good()` on block-relay-only peer addresses causes the addrman logic around maintaining the new and tried table to be less good, and in particular makes it so that block-relay-only peer addresses are more likely to be evicted from the addrman (for no good reason I can think of). So, mark those addresses as good when we connect.
* Fix test-before-evict bug. There's a bug where if we get a collision in the tried table with an existing address that is one of our current peers, and the connection is long-lived enough, then `SelectTriedCollisions()` might return that existing peer address to us as a test-before-evict connection candidate. However, our logic for new outbound connections would later prevent us from actually making a connection; the result would be that when we get a collision with a long-lived current peer, that peer's address is likely to get evicted from the tried table. Fix this by checking to see if a test-before-evict candidate is a peer we're currently connected to, and if so, mark it as `Good()`.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 16d9bfc417
amitiuttarwar:
code review ACK 16d9bfc417
mzumsande:
Code-Review ACK 16d9bfc417.
jnewbery:
utACK 16d9bfc417
ariard:
Code Review ACK 16d9bfc.
jonatack:
Tested ACK 16d9bfc417
Tree-SHA512: 188ccb814e436937cbb91d29d73c316ce83f4b9c22f1cda56747f0949a093e10161ae724e87e4a2d85ac40f85f5f6b4e87e97d350a1ac44f80c57783f4423324
Being able to invoke Good() is important for address management (new vs tried
table, tried table eviction via test-before-evict). We mitigate potential
information leaks by not calling Connected() on these peer addresses.
If `-logips -debug=net` is specified then we print the contents of the
version message we send to the peer, including his address. Because the
addresses in the version message use pre-BIP155 encoding they cannot
represent a Tor v3 address and we would actually send 16 `0`s instead (a
dummy IPv6 address). However we would print the full address in the log
message. Before this fix:
```
2020-10-21T12:24:17Z send version message: version 70016, blocks=653500, us=[::]:0, them=xwjtp3mj427zdp4tljiiivg2l5ijfvmt5lcsfaygtpp6cw254kykvpyd.onion:8333, peer=0
```
This is confusing because we pretend to send one thing while we actually
send another. Adjust the printout to reflect what we are sending. After
this fix:
```
2020-10-21T12:26:54Z send version message: version 70016, blocks=653500, us=[::]:0, them=[::]:0, peer=0
```
da0988daf1 scripted-diff: rename vRecvGetData (Neha Narula)
ba951812ec Guard vRecvGetData (now in net processing) with its own mutex (Neha Narula)
2d9f2fca43 Move vRecvGetData to net processing (Neha Narula)
673247b58c Lock before checking if orphan_work_set is empty; indicate it is guarded (Neha Narula)
8803aee668 Move m_orphan_work_set to net_processing (Neha Narula)
9c47cb29f9 [Rename only] Rename orphan_work_set to m_orphan_work_set. (Neha Narula)
Pull request description:
Add annotations to guard `vRecvGetData` and `orphan_work_set` and fix up places where they were accessed without a lock. There is no current data race because they happen to be accessed by only one thread, but this might not always be the case.
Original discussion: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18861#discussion_r451778445
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK da0988daf1🐬
jnewbery:
Code review ACK da0988daf1
hebasto:
ACK da0988daf1, I have reviewed the code and it looks correct, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 31cadd319ddc9273a87e77afc4db7339fd636e816b5e742eba5cb32927ac5cc07a672b2268d2d38a75a0f1b17d93836adab9acf7e52f26ea9a43f54efa57257e
fa1f6f237d net: Send post-verack handshake messages at most once (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
There is no need to send `SENDHEADERS` and `SENDCMPCT` messages as a reply to each `VERACK` that is received. For alive checks, a `PING`/`PONG` can be used.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Concept ACK fa1f6f237d this is the only code section that sets `fCurrentlyConnected` and `fSuccessfullyConnected` to true. Could add a test. I did not verify if this code is actually being called repeatedly post initial verack; was it?
hebasto:
ACK fa1f6f237d, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
naumenkogs:
ACK fa1f6f237d
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa1f6f237d
Tree-SHA512: c841d5d3807254a49463bbcfac3b32881b34a9d3206899544c86322c20988e17ad2ae243cba227fd3825a914f0cb2584451edda2414aecee6d5e3f5a0636f08a
fd9a0060f0 Report and verify expirations (Pieter Wuille)
86f50ed10f Delete limitedmap as it is unused now (Pieter Wuille)
cc16fff3e4 Make txid delay penalty also apply to fetches of orphan's parents (Pieter Wuille)
173a1d2d3f Expedite removal of tx requests that are no longer needed (Pieter Wuille)
de11b0a4ef Reduce MAX_PEER_TX_ANNOUNCEMENTS for non-PF_RELAY peers (Pieter Wuille)
242d16477d Change transaction request logic to use txrequest (Pieter Wuille)
5b03121d60 Add txrequest fuzz tests (Pieter Wuille)
3c7fe0e5a0 Add txrequest unit tests (Pieter Wuille)
da3b8fde03 Add txrequest module (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This replaces the transaction request logic with an encapsulated class that maintains all the state surrounding it. By keeping it stand alone, it can be easily tested (using included unit tests and fuzz tests).
The major changes are:
* Announcements from outbound (and whitelisted) peers are now always preferred over those from inbound peers. This used to be the case for the first request (by delaying the first request from inbound peers), and a bias afters. The 2s delay for requests from inbound peers still exists, but after that, if viable outbound peers remain for any given transaction, they will always be tried first.
* No more hard cap of 100 in flight transactions per peer, as there is less need for it (memory usage is linear in the number of announcements, but independent from the number in flight, and CPU usage isn't affected by it). Furthermore, if only one peer announces a transaction, and it has over 100 in flight already, we still want to request it from them. The cap is replaced with a rule that announcements from such overloaded peers get an additional 2s delay (possibly combined with the existing 2s delays for inbound connections, and for txid peers when wtxid peers are available).
* The limit of 100000 tracked announcements is reduced to 5000; this was excessive. This can be bypassed using the PF_RELAY permission (to accommodate locally dumping a batch of many transactions).
This replaces #19184, rebased on #18044 and with many small changes.
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
Code Review ACK fd9a006. I've reviewed the new TxRequestTracker, its integration in net_processing, unit/functional/fuzzing test coverage. I looked more for soundness of new specification rather than functional consistency with old transaction request logic.
MarcoFalke:
Approach ACK fd9a0060f0🏹
naumenkogs:
Code Review ACK fd9a006. I've reviewed everything, mostly to see how this stuff works at the lower level (less documentation-wise, more implementation-wise), and to try breaking it with unexpected sequences of events.
jnewbery:
utACK fd9a0060f0
jonatack:
WIP light ACK fd9a0060f0 have read the code, verified that each commit is hygienic, e.g. debug build clean and tests green, and have been running a node on and off with this branch and grepping the net debug log. Am still unpacking the discussion hidden by GitHub by fetching it via the API and connecting the dots, storing notes and suggestions in a local branch; at this point none are blockers.
ryanofsky:
Light code review ACK fd9a0060f0, looking at txrequest implementation, unit test implementation, and net_processing integration, just trying to understand how it works and looking for anything potentially confusing in the implementation. Didn't look at functional tests or catch up on review discussion. Just a sanity check review focused on:
Tree-SHA512: ea7b52710371498b59d9c9cfb5230dd544fe9c6cb699e69178dea641646104f38a0b5ec7f5f0dbf1eb579b7ec25a31ea420593eff3b7556433daf92d4b0f0dd7
Whenever a transaction is added to the mempool or orphan pool, both
its txid and wtxid are considered AlreadyHave, and thus will eventually
be removed from m_txrequest.
The same is true for hashes added to the reject filter, but note that sometimes
only the wtxid is added (in which case only the wtxid can be removed from
m_txrequest).
Maintaining up to 100000 INVs per peer is excessive, as that is far more
than fits in a typical mempool.
Also disable the "overload" penalty for PF_RELAY peers.
This removes most transaction request logic from net_processing, and
replaces it with calls to a global TxRequestTracker object.
The major changes are:
* Announcements from outbound (and whitelisted) peers are now always
preferred over those from inbound peers. This used to be the case for the
first request (by delaying the first request from inbound peers), and
a bias afters. The 2s delay for requests from inbound peers still exists,
but after that, if viable outbound peers remain for any given transaction,
they will always be tried first.
* No more hard cap of 100 in flight transactions per peer, as there is less
need for it (memory usage is linear in the number of announcements, but
independent from the number in flight, and CPU usage isn't affected by it).
Furthermore, if only one peer announces a transaction, and it has over 100
in flight and requestable already, we still want to request it from them.
The cap is replaced with an additional 2s delay (possibly combined with the
existing 2s delays for inbound connections, and for txid peers when wtxid
peers are available).
Includes functional tests written by Marco Falke and Antoine Riard.
dcf0cb4776 tor: make a TORv3 hidden service instead of TORv2 (Vasil Dimov)
353a3fdaad net: advertise support for ADDRv2 via new message (Vasil Dimov)
201a4596d9 net: CAddress & CAddrMan: (un)serialize as ADDRv2 (Vasil Dimov)
1d3ec2a1fd Support bypassing range check in ReadCompactSize (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This PR contains the two remaining commits from #19031 to complete the [BIP155](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0155.mediawiki) implementation:
`net: CAddress & CAddrMan: (un)serialize as ADDRv2`
`net: advertise support for ADDRv2 via new message`
plus one more commit:
`tor: make a TORv3 hidden service instead of TORv2`
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK dcf0cb4776 per `git diff 9b56a68 dcf0cb4` only change since last review is an update to the release notes which partially picked up the suggested text. Running a node on this branch and addnode-ing to 6 other Tor v3 nodes, I see "addrv2" and "sendaddrv2" messages in getpeerinfo in both the "bytesrecv_per_msg" and "bytessent_per_msg" JSON objects.
sipa:
ACK dcf0cb4776
hebasto:
re-ACK dcf0cb4776, the node works flawlessly in all of the modes: Tor-only, clearnet-only, mixed.
laanwj:
Edit: I have to retract this ACK for now, I'm having some problems with this PR on a FreeBSD node. It drops all outgoing connections with this dcf0cb4776 merged on master (12a1c3ad1a).
ariard:
Code Review ACK dcf0cb4
Tree-SHA512: 28d4d0d817b8664d2f4b18c0e0f31579b2f0f2d23310ed213f1f436a4242afea14dfbf99e07e15889bc5c5c71ad50056797e9307ff8a90e96704f588a6171308
Introduce a new message `sendaddrv2` to signal support for ADDRv2.
Send the new message immediately after sending the `VERACK` message.
Add support for receiving and parsing ADDRv2 messages.
Send ADDRv2 messages (instead of ADDR) to a peer if he has
advertised support for it.
Co-authored-by: Carl Dong <contact@carldong.me>
b048b275d9 [validation] Remove absurdfee from accepttomempool (John Newbery)
932564b9cf scripted-diff: update max-fee-exceeded error message to include RPC (gzhao408)
8f1290c601 [rpc/node] check for high fee before ATMP in clients (gzhao408)
Pull request description:
Picked up from #15810. Add separate fee-checking logic for clients that need to enforce max fee rates, then remove the `absurdFee` logic from ATMP.
ATMP's `nAbsurdFee` argument is used to enforce user-specific behavior (it is not policy since it isn't applied consistently: it is only ever used in RPC and wallet, and set to 0 everywhere else internally). It should be removed from `AcceptToMemoryPool` because (1) validation results/mempool behavior should not be user-specific and (2) enforcing a max fee rate should be the responsibility of the client instead of the mempool.
Note: this PR does not intend to _remove_ protection from high fees, just re-delegate the responsibility to clients.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK b048b275d9
LarryRuane:
re-ACK b048b275d9
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK b048b275d9 , only change is squashing one commit 🏦
instagibbs:
utACK b048b275d9
Tree-SHA512: 57c17ba16d230a4cae2896dd6a64c924f307757824e35784bf96da7b10aff2d8ea910710edf35e981035623a155f8766209a92a0fdb856549fde78bc3eaae4d2
675e55e013 Ignore unknown messages before VERACK (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
This allows for feature negotiation to take place with messages between VERSION and VERACK in the future, without requiring additional software changes to specifically ignore messages for features that are unimplemented by our software.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 675e55e013
practicalswift:
ACK 675e55e013: patch looks correct
MarcoFalke:
ACK 675e55e013
hebasto:
ACK 675e55e013, the offender peer will be eventually disconnected due to the timeout.
Tree-SHA512: 8d2b1d8b9843f2ee26b2c30f7c5ff0bfcfbe3f46b32cd0369c48ece26624151091237e83ce3f18c6da004099026602cfab1642ac916db777f047d170b365c007
d76925478e [doc] Clarify semantic of peer's m_protect w.r.t to outbound eviction logics (Antoine Riard)
ac71fe936d [doc] Clarify scope of eviction protection of outbound block-relay peers (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
Block-relay-only peers were introduced by #15759. According to its
author, it was intented to make them only immune to outbound peer
rotation-based eviction and not from all eviction as modified comment
leans to think of.
Clearly indicate that outbound block-relay peers aren't protected
from eviction by the bad/lagging chain logic.
Fix#19863
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK d76925478e
jonatack:
ACK d76925478e
Tree-SHA512: 597fbd62838a6e39276024165b11514cad20a2e9d33cf9202d261cbadcb62b2df427c858e0cb57e585840d4c1d4600104aa53916bb868541f2580e4eed9b4b52
deb52711a1 Remove header checks out of net_processing (Troy Giorshev)
52d4ae46ab Give V1TransportDeserializer CChainParams& member (Troy Giorshev)
5bceef6b12 Change CMessageHeader Constructor (Troy Giorshev)
1ca20c1af8 Add doxygen comment for ReceiveMsgBytes (Troy Giorshev)
890b1d7c2b Move checksum check from net_processing to net (Troy Giorshev)
2716647ebf Give V1TransportDeserializer an m_node_id member (Troy Giorshev)
Pull request description:
Inspired by #15206 and #15197, this PR moves all message header verification from the message processing layer and into the network/transport layer.
In the previous PRs there is a change in behavior, where we would disconnect from peers upon a single failed checksum check. In various discussions there was concern over whether this was the right choice, and some expressed a desire to see how this would look if it was made to be a pure refactor.
For more context, see https://bitcoincore.reviews/15206.html#l-81.
This PR improves the separation between the p2p layers, helping improvements like [BIP324](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18242) and #18989.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK deb52711a1 just rebase due to conflict on adjacent line
jnewbery:
Code review ACK deb52711a1.
Tree-SHA512: 1a3b7ae883b020cfee1bef968813e04df651ffdad9dd961a826bd80654f2c98676ce7f4721038a1b78d8790e4cebe8060419e3d8affc97ce2b9b4e4b72e6fa9f
a512925e19 [doc] Release notes (Amiti Uttarwar)
50f94b34a3 [rpc] Deprecate getpeerinfo addnode field (Amiti Uttarwar)
df091b9b50 [refactor] Rename test file to allow any getpeerinfo deprecations. (Amiti Uttarwar)
395acfa83a [rpc] Add connection type to getpeerinfo RPC, update tests (Amiti Uttarwar)
49c10a9ca4 [log] Add connection type to log statement (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
After #19316, we can more directly expose information about the connection type on the `getpeerinfo` RPC. Doing so also makes the existing addnode field redundant, so this PR begins the process of deprecating this field.
This PR also includes one commit that improves a log message, as both use a shared function to return the connection type as a string.
Suggested by sdaftuar- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19316#discussion_r468001604 & https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19316#discussion_r468018093
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK a512925e19.
sipa:
utACK a512925e19
guggero:
Tested and code review ACK a512925e.
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK a512925e19🌇
promag:
Code review ACK a512925e19.
Tree-SHA512: 601a7a38aee235ee59aca690784f886dc2ae4e418b2e6422c4b58cd597376c00f74910f66920b08a08a0bec28bf8022e71a1435785ff6ba8a188954261aba78e
0bd1184adf Remove unused LockAssertion struct (Hennadii Stepanov)
ab2a44297f Replace LockAssertion with a proper thread safety annotations (Hennadii Stepanov)
73f71e1996 refactor: Use explicit function type instead of template (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR replaces `LockAssertion` with `AssertLockHeld`, and removes `LockAssertion`.
This PR is compared with alternatives in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/AssertLockHeld-PRs
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 0bd1184adf
ajtowns:
ACK 0bd1184adf
vasild:
ACK 0bd1184ad
Tree-SHA512: ef7780dd689faf0bb479fdb97c49bc652e2dd10c148234bb95502dfbb676442d8565ee37864d923ca21a25f9dc2a335bf46ee82c095e387b59a664ab05c0ae41
This moves header size and netmagic checking out of net_processing and
into net. This check now runs in ReadHeader, so that net can exit early
out of receiving bytes from the peer. IsValid is now slimmed down, so
it no longer needs a MessageStartChars& parameter.
Additionally this removes the rest of the m_valid_* members from
CNetMessage.
This removes the m_valid_checksum member from CNetMessage. Instead,
GetMessage() returns an Optional.
Additionally, GetMessage() has been given an out parameter to be used to
hold error information. For now it is specifically a uint32_t used to
hold the raw size of the corrupt message.
The checksum check is now done in GetMessage.
In addition to adding more specificity to the log statement about the type of
connection, this change also consolidates two statements into one. Previously,
the second one should have never been hit, since block-relay connections would
match the "!IsInboundConn()" condition and return early.
ddefb5c0b7 p2p: Use the greatest common version in peer logic (Hennadii Stepanov)
e084d45562 p2p: Remove SetCommonVersion() from VERACK handler (Hennadii Stepanov)
8d2026796a refactor: Rename local variable nSendVersion (Hennadii Stepanov)
e9a6d8b13b p2p: Unify Send and Receive protocol versions (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On master (6fef85bfa3) `CNode` has two members to keep protocol version:
- `nRecvVersion` for received messages
- `nSendVersion` for messages to send
After exchanging with `VERSION` and `VERACK` messages via protocol version `INIT_PROTO_VERSION`, both nodes set `nRecvVersion` _and_ `nSendVersion` to _the same_ value which is the greatest common protocol version.
This PR:
- replaces two `CNode` members, `nRecvVersion` `nSendVersion`, with `m_greatest_common_version`
- removes duplicated getter and setter
There is no change in behavior on the P2P network.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK ddefb5c0b7
naumenkogs:
ACK ddefb5c0b7
fjahr:
Code review ACK ddefb5c0b7
amitiuttarwar:
code review but untested ACK ddefb5c0b7
benthecarman:
utACK `ddefb5c`
Tree-SHA512: 5305538dbaa5426b923b0afd20bdef4f248d310855d1d78427210c00716c67b7cb691515c421716b6157913e453076e293b10ff5fd2cd26a8e5375d42da7809d
0d04784af1 Refactor the functional test (Gleb Naumenko)
83ad65f31b Address nits in ADDR caching (Gleb Naumenko)
81b00f8780 Add indexing ADDR cache by local socket addr (Gleb Naumenko)
42ec558542 Justify the choice of ADDR cache lifetime (Gleb Naumenko)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up on #18991 which does 3 things:
- improves privacy of a node listening to multiple addresses via adding cache index by local socket addr (suggested [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18991#issuecomment-668219345))
- documents on the choice of 24h cache lifetime
- addresses nits from #18991
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 0d04784af1
vasild:
ACK 0d04784
jonatack:
Code review ACK 0d04784
Tree-SHA512: bb65a34dd1ce2811186d3e4469bc33e8399cebaaa494ce13041c7cff23275870e4176a719f7a72f8d779c49f8b2344bf4fa1aeb3ea4e2626d5ae76514f00a750
a8a64acaf3 [BroadcastTransaction] Remove unsafe move operator (Amiti Uttarwar)
125c038126 [p2p] Remove dead code (Amiti Uttarwar)
fc66d0a65c [p2p] Check for nullptr before dereferencing pointer (Adam Jonas)
cb79b9dbf4 [mempool] Revert unbroadcast set to tracking just txid (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
Addresses some outstanding review comments from #18044
- reverts unbroadcast txids to a set instead of a map (simpler, communicates intent better, takes less space, no efficiency advantages of map)
- adds safety around two touchpoints (check for nullptr before dereferencing pointer, remove an inaccurate std::move operator)
- removes some dead code
Links to comments on wtxid PR: [1](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18044#discussion_r460495254) [2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18044#discussion_r460496023) [3](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18044#discussion_r463532611)
thanks to jnewbery & adamjonas for flagging these ! !
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
utACK a8a64acaf3
naumenkogs:
utACK a8a64acaf3
jnewbery:
utACK a8a64acaf3
Tree-SHA512: 7be669cb30cc17fb9e06b50e636ef7887c6a27354697987e4e4d38dba4b8f50e175647587430cd9bc3295bec01ce8b1e6639a50a4249d8fff9b1ca1b9ead3277
The field m_protect is used to protect from eviction both by bad/lagging
chain and extra outbound peers logics. Outbound block-relay peers are
always excluded from this protection.
There is a keyword that allows us to break out of loops. Use it.
There's a small change in behaviour here: if we process multiple orphans
that are still orphans, then we'll only call mempool.check() once at the
end, instead of after processing each tx.
bb6a32ce99 [net processing] Move Misbehaving() to PeerManager (John Newbery)
aa114b1c9b [net_processing] Move SendBlockTransactions into PeerManager (John Newbery)
3115e00f75 [net processing] Move MaybePunishPeerForTx to PeerManager (John Newbery)
e662e2d42a [net processing] Move ProcessOrphanTx to PeerManager (John Newbery)
b70cd890e3 [net processing] Move MaybePunishNodeForBlock into PeerManager (John Newbery)
d7778351bf [net processing] Move ProcessHeadersMessage to PeerManager (John Newbery)
64f6162651 [whitespace] tidy up indentation after scripted diff (John Newbery)
58bd369b0d scripted-diff: [net processing] Rename PeerLogicValidation to PeerManager (John Newbery)
2297b26b3c [net_processing] Pass chainparams to PeerLogicValidation constructor (John Newbery)
824bbd1ffb [move only] Collect all private members of PeerLogicValidation together (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Continues the work of moving net_processing logic into PeerLogicValidation. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19704 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19607#discussion_r462032894 for motivation.
This PR also renames `PeerLogicValidation` to `PeerManager` as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10756#pullrequestreview-53892618.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK bb6a32ce99 only change is rebase due to conflict in struct NodeContext and variable rename 🤸
hebasto:
re-ACK bb6a32ce99, only rebased, and added renaming `s/peer_logic/peerman/` into scripted-diff since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19791#pullrequestreview-483118079) review (verified with `git range-diff`).
Tree-SHA512: a2de4a521688fd25125b401e5575402c52b328a0fa27b3010567008d4f596b960aabbd02b2d81f42658f88f4365443fadb1008150a62fbcea123fb42d85a2c21
Block-relay-only peers were introduced by #15759. According to its
author, it was intented to make them only immune to outbound peer
rotation-based eviction and not from all eviction as modified comment
leans to think of.
Clearly indicate that outbound block-relay peers aren't protected
from eviction by the bad/lagging chain logic.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/PeerLogicValidation/PeerManager/g' $(git grep -l PeerLogicValidation ./src ./test)
sed -i 's/peer_logic/peerman/g' $(git grep -l peer_logic ./src ./test)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
PeerLogicValidation was originally net_processing's implementation to
the validation interface. It has since grown to contain much of
net_processing's logic. Therefore rename it to reflect its
responsibilities.
Suggested in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10756#pullrequestreview-53892618.
Keep a references to chainparams, rather than calling the global
Params() function every time it's needed. This is fine, since
globalChainParams does not get updated once it's been set, and it's
available at the point of constructing the PeerLogicValidation object.
We don't have a project style for ordering class members, but it always
makes sense to have no more than one of each public/protected/private
specifier.
Also move documentation for MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect to the header.
296be8f58e Get rid of unused functions CTxMemPool::GetMemPoolChildren, CTxMemPool::GetMemPoolParents (Jeremy Rubin)
46d955d196 Remove mapLinks in favor of entry inlined structs with iterator type erasure (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
Currently we have a peculiar data structure in the mempool called maplinks. Maplinks job is to track the in-pool children and parents of each transaction. This PR can be primarily understood and reviewed as a simple refactoring to remove this extra data structure, although it comes with a nice memory and performance improvement for free.
Maplinks is particularly peculiar because removing it is not as simple as just moving it's inner structure to the owning CTxMempoolEntry. Because TxLinks (the class storing the setEntries for parents and children) store txiters to each entry in the mempool corresponding to the parent or child, it means that the TxLinks type is "aware" of the boost multiindex (mapTx) it's coming from, which is in turn, aware of the entry type stored in mapTx. Thus we used maplinks to store this entry associated data we in an entirely separate data structure just to avoid a circular type reference caused by storing a txiter inside a CTxMempoolEntry.
It turns out, we can kill this circular reference by making use of iterator_to multiindex function and std::reference_wrapper. This allows us to get rid of the maplinks data structure and move the ownership of the parents/child sets to the entries themselves.
The benefit of this good all around, for any of the reasons given below the change would be acceptable, and it doesn't make the code harder to reason about or worse in any respect (as far as I can tell, there's no tradeoff).
### Simpler ownership model
No longer having to consistency check that mapLinks did have records for our CTxMempoolEntry, impossible to have a mapLinks entry outlive or incorrectly die before a CTxMempoolEntry.
### Memory Usage
We get rid of a O(Transactions) sized map in the mempool, which is a long lived data structure.
### Performance
If you have a CTxMemPoolEntry, you immediately know the address of it's children/parents, rather than having to do a O(log(Transactions)) lookup via maplinks (which we do very often). We do it in *so many* places that a true benchmark has to look at a full running node, but it is easy enough to show an improvement in this case.
The ComplexMemPool shows a good coherence check that we see the expected result of it being 12.5% faster / 1.14x faster.
```
Before:
# Benchmark, evals, iterations, total, min, max, median
ComplexMemPool, 5, 1, 1.40462, 0.277222, 0.285339, 0.279793
After:
# Benchmark, evals, iterations, total, min, max, median
ComplexMemPool, 5, 1, 1.22586, 0.243831, 0.247076, 0.244596
```
The ComplexMemPool benchmark only checks doing addUnchecked and TrimToSize for 800 transactions. While this bench does a good job of hammering the relevant types of function, it doesn't test everything.
Subbing in 5000 transactions shows a that the advantage isn't completely wiped out by other asymptotic factors (this isn't the only bottleneck in growing the mempool), but it's only a bit proportionally slower (10.8%, 1.12x), which adds evidence that this will be a good change for performance minded users.
```
# Benchmark, evals, iterations, total, min, max, median
ComplexMemPool, 5, 1, 59.1321, 11.5919, 12.235, 11.7068
# Benchmark, evals, iterations, total, min, max, median
ComplexMemPool, 5, 1, 52.1307, 10.2641, 10.5206, 10.4306
```
I don't think it's possible to come up with an example of where a maplinks based design would have better performance, but it's something for reviewers to consider.
# Discussion
## Why maplinks in the first place?
I spoke with the author of mapLinks (sdaftuar) a while back, and my recollection from our conversation was that it was implemented because he did not know how to resolve the circular dependency at the time, and there was no other reason for making it a separate map.
## Is iterator_to weird?
iterator_to is expressly for this purpose, see https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_51_0/libs/multi_index/doc/tutorial/indices.html#iterator_to
> iterator_to provides a way to retrieve an iterator to an element from a pointer to the element, thus making iterators and pointers interchangeable for the purposes of element pointing (not so for traversal) in many situations. This notwithstanding, it is not the aim of iterator_to to promote the usage of pointers as substitutes for real iterators: the latter are specifically designed for handling the elements of a container, and not only benefit from the iterator orientation of container interfaces, but are also capable of exposing many more programming bugs than raw pointers, both at compile and run time. iterator_to is thus meant to be used in scenarios where access via iterators is not suitable or desireable:
>
> - Interoperability with preexisting APIs based on pointers or references.
> - Publication of pointer-based interfaces (for instance, when designing a C-compatible library).
> - The exposure of pointers in place of iterators can act as a type erasure barrier effectively decoupling the user of the code from the implementation detail of which particular container is being used. Similar techniques, like the famous Pimpl idiom, are used in large projects to reduce dependencies and build times.
> - Self-referencing contexts where an element acts upon its owner container and no iterator to itself is available.
In other words, iterator_to is the perfect tool for the job by the last reason given. Under the hood it should just be a simple pointer cast and have no major runtime overhead (depending on if the function call is inlined).
Edit by laanwj: removed at sign from the description
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK 296be8f per `git range-diff ab338a19 3ba1665 296be8f`, sanity check gcc 10.2 debug build is clean.
hebasto:
re-ACK 296be8f58e, only rebased since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19478#pullrequestreview-482400727) review (verified with `git range-diff`).
Tree-SHA512: f5c30a4936fcde6ae32a02823c303b3568a747c2681d11f87df88a149f984a6d3b4c81f391859afbeb68864ef7f6a3d8779f74a58e3de701b3d51f78e498682e
86d4cf42d9 Increase the ip address relay branching factor for unreachable networks (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Onion addresses propagate very badly among the IPv4/IPv6 network, resulting
in difficulty for those to find each other.
The branching factor 1 is probably so low that propagations die out before
they reach another onion peer. Increase it to 1.5 on average.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 86d4cf42d9 -- patch looks correct
naumenkogs:
ACK 86d4cf4
jonatack:
ACK 86d4cf42d9. Code review, built and running with some sanity check logging. `RelayAddress()` is called by `ProcessMessage() ADDR` msg handling, from within the loop while processing each new address to relay it to a limited number of other nodes. According to git blame, the line setting `nRelayNodes` hasn't been touched since 2016 in e736772c56 *Move network-msg-processing code out of main to its own file*, which moved the line but otherwise did not change it. Running a mixed clearnet/onion node with this patch and the logging below, I'm only seeing values of `fReachable 1, nRelayNodes 2`. IIUC, I need to use the settings in `init.cpp` that call `SetReachable(*, false)`. *Edit:* with `onlynet=onion` am now seeing entries of `fReachable 0` with `nRelayNodes` values of 1 and 2.
vasild:
ACK 86d4cf42d
Tree-SHA512: 22391e16d60bcfdec9a9336728da39d68a24a183b3d1b0e8fbc038d265ca6ddf71d16db018f3678745fd9f3e9281049e42197fa0a29124833c50a9170ed6f793
The else clause is dead code because the only way to not enter the if branch is
if TX_WITNESS_STRIPPED is true. In that case, it would not have a witness to
match the `tx.HasWitness()` else condition.
Co-authored-by: Adam Jonas <jonas@chaincode.com>
Co-authored-by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com>
When I originally implemented the unbroadcast set in 18038, it just tracked
txids. After 18038 was merged, I offered a patch to 18044 to make the
unbroadcast changes compatible with wtxid relay. In this patch, I updated
`unbroadcast_txids` to a map of txid -> wtxid. Post merge review comments shed
light on the fact that this update was unnecessary, and distracting. So, this
commit updates the unbroadcast ids back to a set.
Previously we deduced it was a block-relay-only based on presence of the
m_tx_relay structure. Now we have the ability to identify it directly via a
connection type accessor function.
We previously identified if we relay addresses to the connection by checking
for the existence of the m_addr_known data structure. With this commit, we
answer this question based on the connection type.
IsAddrRelayPeer() checked for the existence of the m_addr_known
fb56d37612 p2p: ensure inv is GenMsgTx before ToGenTxid in inv processing (John Newbery)
aa3621385e test: use CInv::MSG_WITNESS_TX flag in p2p_segwit (Jon Atack)
24ee4f01ea p2p: make gtxid(.hash) and fAlreadyHave localvars const (Jon Atack)
b1c855453b p2p: use CInv block message helpers in net_processing.cpp (Jon Atack)
acd6642167 [net processing] Change AlreadyHaveTx() to take a GenTxid (John Newbery)
5fdfb80b86 [net processing] Change AlreadyHaveBlock() to take block_hash argument (John Newbery)
430e183b89 [net processing] Remove mempool argument from AlreadyHaveBlock() (John Newbery)
42ca5618ca [net processing] Split AlreadyHave() into separate block and tx functions (John Newbery)
39f1dc9445 p2p: remove nFetchFlags from NetMsgType TX and INV processing (Jon Atack)
471714e1f0 p2p: add CInv block message helper methods (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Building on #19590 and the recent `wtxid` and `GenTxid` changes, this is a refactoring and cleanup PR to simplify and improve some of the net processing code.
Some of the diffs are best reviewed with `-w` to ignore spacing.
Co-authored by John Newbery.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fb56d37612
jnewbery:
utACK fb56d37612
vasild:
ACK fb56d3761
Tree-SHA512: ba39b58e6aaf850880a842fe5f6295e9f1870906ef690206acfc17140aae2ac854981e1066dbcd4238062478762fbd040ef772fdc2c50eea6869997c583e6a6d
ea74e10acf doc: Add best practice for annotating/asserting locks (Hennadii Stepanov)
2ee7743fe7 sync.h: Make runtime lock checks require compile-time lock checks (Anthony Towns)
23d71d171e Do not hide compile-time thread safety warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)
3ddc150857 Add missed thread safety annotations (Hennadii Stepanov)
af9ea55a72 Use LockAssertion utility class instead of AssertLockHeld() (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On the way of transit from `RecursiveMutex` to `Mutex` (see #19303) it is crucial to have run-time `AssertLockHeld()` assertion that does _not_ hide compile-time Clang Thread Safety Analysis warnings.
On master (65e4ecabd5) using `AssertLockHeld()` could hide Clang Thread Safety Analysis warnings, e.g., with the following patch applied:
```diff
--- a/src/txmempool.h
+++ b/src/txmempool.h
@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ public:
void addUnchecked(const CTxMemPoolEntry& entry, setEntries& setAncestors, bool validFeeEstimate = true) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs, cs_main);
void removeRecursive(const CTransaction& tx, MemPoolRemovalReason reason) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs);
- void removeForReorg(const CCoinsViewCache* pcoins, unsigned int nMemPoolHeight, int flags) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs, cs_main);
+ void removeForReorg(const CCoinsViewCache* pcoins, unsigned int nMemPoolHeight, int flags) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main);
void removeConflicts(const CTransaction& tx) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs);
void removeForBlock(const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& vtx, unsigned int nBlockHeight) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs);
```
Clang compiles the code without any thread safety warnings.
See "Add missed thread safety annotations" commit for the actual thread safety warnings that are fixed in this PR.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK ea74e10acf 🎙
jnewbery:
ACK ea74e10acf
ajtowns:
ACK ea74e10acf
Tree-SHA512: 8cba996e526751a1cb0e613c0cc1b10f027a3e9945fbfb4bd30f6355fd36b9f9c2e1e95ed3183fc254b42df7c30223278e18e5bdb5e1ef85db7fef067595d447
This change prepares for upcoming commit "Do not hide compile-time
thread safety warnings" by replacing AssertLockHeld() with
LockAssertion() where needed.
8e35bf5906 scripted-diff: rename misbehavior members (John Newbery)
1f96d2e673 [net processing] Move misbehavior tracking state to Peer (John Newbery)
7cd4159ac8 [net processing] Add Peer (John Newbery)
aba03359a6 [net processing] Remove CNodeState.name (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
We currently have two structures for per-peer data:
- `CNode` in net, which should just contain connection layer data (eg socket, send/recv buffers, etc), but currently also contains some application layer data (eg tx/block inventory).
- `CNodeState` in net processing, which contains p2p application layer data, but requires cs_main to be locked for access.
This PR adds a third struct `Peer`, which is for p2p application layer data, and doesn't require cs_main. Eventually all application layer data from `CNode` should be moved to `Peer`, and any data that doesn't strictly require cs_main should be moved from `CNodeState` to `Peer` (probably all of `CNodeState` eventually).
`Peer` objects are stored as shared pointers in a net processing global map `g_peer_map`, which is protected by `g_peer_mutex`. To use a `Peer` object, `g_peer_mutex` is locked, a copy of the shared pointer is taken, and the lock is released. Individual members of `Peer` are protected by different mutexes that guard related data. The lifetime of the `Peer` object is managed by the shared_ptr refcount.
This PR adds the `Peer` object and moves the misbehaving data from `CNodeState` to `Peer`. This allows us to immediately remove 15 `LOCK(cs_main)` instances.
For more motivation see #19398
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 8e35bf5906
troygiorshev:
reACK 8e35bf5906 via `git range-diff master 9510938 8e35bf5`
theuni:
ACK 8e35bf5906.
jonatack:
ACK 8e35bf5906 keeping in mind Cory's comment (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19607#discussion_r470173964) for the follow-up
Tree-SHA512: ad84a92b78fb34c9f43813ca3dfbc7282c887d55300ea2ce0994d134da3e0c7dbc44d54380e00b13bb75a57c28857ac3236bea9135467075d78026767a19e4b1
and otherwise log that an unknown INV type was received.
In INV processing, when handling transaction type inv messages,
ToGenTxid() expects that we constructed the CInv ourselves or
that we verified that it is for a transaction type CInv.
Therefore, change this `else` branch into an `else if (inv.GenMsgTx())`
to make this safer and log any INVs that fall through.
