fa60169811 rpc: Move signmessage RPC util to new file (MacroFake)
fa9425177e Remove cs_main from verifymessage (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
The `verifymessage` RPC has several issues:
* It takes `cs_main` for no reason, blocking progress on removing the `cs_main` global mutex.
* It is located in a file called `misc`, which is not a very helpful name.
Fix all issues.
ACKs for top commit:
vincenzopalazzo:
ACK fa60169811
Tree-SHA512: c71a1f481b828e0a544405fecbbc7ca44e66ea46b498d7aed1f1c584d6a99724deb13e89d90b9d5cdeecbce293e6a41e9f7ae299543f6d761bf9e7a839b6c7f3
71c3f0356c move-only: Rename index + pruning functional test (Fabian Jahr)
de08932efa test: Update test for indices on pruned nodes (Fabian Jahr)
825d19839b Index: Allow coinstatsindex with pruning enabled (Fabian Jahr)
f08c9fb0c6 Index: Use prune locks for blockfilterindex (Fabian Jahr)
2561823531 blockstorage: Add prune locks to BlockManager (Fabian Jahr)
231fc7b035 refactor: Introduce GetFirstStoredBlock helper function (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
# Motivation
The main motivation of this change and only behavior change noticeable by user is to allow running `coinstatsindex` on pruned nodes as has been requested [here for example](https://twitter.com/benthecarman/status/1388170854140452870?s=20).
# Background
`coinstatsindex` on pruned nodes can be enabled in a much simpler than it is done here but it comes with downside. The ability to run `blockfilterindex`on pruned nodes was added in #15946 but it also added the `blockfilterindex` as a dependency to `validation` and it introduced two new circular dependencies. Enabling `coinstatsindex` on pruned nodes in a similar way would add it as a dependency as well and introduce another circular dependency.
Instead, this PR introduces a `m_prune_blockers` map to `BlockManager` as a flexible approach to block pruning. Entities like `blockfilterindex`, for example, can add a key and a height to block pruning over that height. These entities need to update that value to allow more pruning when they are ready.
# Alternative approach
Upon completing the first draft of this PR I found #19463 as an alternative that follows the same but follows a very different approach. I am listing the main differences here as I see them:
- Usage of globals
- Blocks pruning with a start and a stop height
- Can persist blockers across restarts
- Blockers can be set/unset via RPCs
Personally, I don't think any of these are necessary to be added here but if the general approach or specific features are more appealing to reviewers I am happy to change to a solution based on that PR or port over specific parts of it here.
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code review ACK 71c3f0356c
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 71c3f0356c. Changes since last review: just tweaking comments and asserts, and rebasing
w0xlt:
tACK 71c3f0356c on signet.
Tree-SHA512: de7efda08b44aa31013fbebc47a02cd2de32db170b570f9643e1f013fee0e8e7ca3068952d1acc6e5e74a70910735c5f263437981ad73df841ad945b52d36b71
fa870e3d4c Remove not needed clang-format off comments (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It seems odd to disable clang-format and force manual formatting when there is no need for it. So remove the clang-format comments and other unneeded comments.
Can be reviewed with `--word-diff-regex=. --ignore-all-space`
Looks like this was initially added in commit d9d79576f4 to accommodate a linter that has since been removed and replaced by a functional test.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa870e3d4c
fanquake:
ACK fa870e3d4c
Tree-SHA512: 0f8f97c12f5dbe517dd96c10b10ce1b8772d8daed33e6b41f73ea1040e89888cf3b8c0ad7b20319e366fe30c71e8b181c89098ae7f6a3deb8647e1b4731db815
a62e84438d fuzz: add `SplitString` fuzz target (MarcoFalke)
4fad7e46d9 test: add unit tests for `SplitString` helper (Kiminuo)
9cc8e876e4 refactor: introduce single-separator split helper `SplitString` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a simple string split helper `SplitString` that takes use of the spanparsing `Split` function that was first introduced in #13697 (commit fe8a7dcd78). This enables to replace most calls to `boost::split`, in the cases where only a single separator character is used. Note that while previous attempts to replace `boost::split` were controversial (e.g. #13751), this one has a trivial implementation: it merely uses an internal helper (that is unit tested and in regular use with output descriptiors) and converts its result from spans to strings. As a drawback though, not all `boost::split` instances can be tackled.
As a possible optimization, one could return a vector of `std::string_view`s (available since C++17) instead of strings, to avoid copies. This would need more carefulness on the caller sites though, to avoid potential lifetime issues, and it's probably not worth it, considering that none of the places where strings are split are really performance-critical.
ACKs for top commit:
martinus:
Code review ACK a62e84438d. Ran all tests. I also like that with `boost::split` it was not obvious that the resulting container was cleared, and with `SplitString` API that's obvious.
Tree-SHA512: 10cb22619ebe46831b1f8e83584a89381a036b54c88701484ac00743e2a62cfe52c9f3ecdbb2d0815e536c99034558277cc263600ec3f3588b291c07eef8ed24
ee02c8bd9a util/check: Add CHECK_NONFATAL identity function, NONFATAL_UNREACHABLE AND UNREACHABLE macros (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
This PR replaces the macro `CHECK_NONFATAL` with an identity function.
I simplified the usage of `CHECK_NONFATAL` where applicable in `src/rpc`.
This function is useful in sanity checks for RPC and command-line interfaces.
Context: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24804#discussion_r846182474.
Also adds `UNREACHABLE_NONFATAL` macro.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK ee02c8bd9a
MarcoFalke:
ACK ee02c8bd9a🍨
Tree-SHA512: 3cba09223cd7b22e62fe5d0b46c4a024c1d9957d4268ba6d3fb07fcc0a5854fc0886bb3266184e6a7df5df91373b3e84edd6adf6999c4e934aeef8c043b01aa2
3ae7791bca refactor: use Span in random.* (pasta)
Pull request description:
~This PR does two things~
1. use a Span<unsigned char> for GetRandBytes and GetStrongRandBytes
~2. make GetRand a template for which any integral type can be used, where the default behavior is to return a random integral up to the max of the integral unless a max is provided.
This simplifies a lot of code from `GetRand(std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max()` -> `GetRand<uint64_t>()`~
MarcoFalke this was inspired by your comment here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24185#issuecomment-1025514263 about using Span, so hopefully I'll be able to get this PR done and merged 😂
~Also, if requested I could revert the `GetRand(std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max()` -> `GetRand<uint64_t>()` related changes if it ends up causing too many conflicts~
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Thank you! Code review re-ACK 3ae7791bca
Tree-SHA512: 12375a83b68b288916ba0de81cfcab4aac14389a66a36811ae850427435eb67dd55e47df9ac3ec47db4e214f4330139e548bec815fff8a3f571484ea558dca79
This helper uses spanparsing::Split internally and enables to replace
all calls to boost::split where only a single separator is passed.
Co-authored-by: Martin Ankerl <Martin.Ankerl@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
cccc4e879a Remove nHeightEnd and nHeight in generateBlocks helper (MarcoFalke)
fa38b1c8bd Remove buggy and confusing IncrementExtraNonce (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
IncrementExtraNonce has many issues:
* It is test-only code, but part of bitcoind
* It is using the block height of the tip, as opposed to the block's previous block as reference for the new height. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24730#issuecomment-1085586193
* It has no use case in regtest testing. With a low difficulty the extra nonce won't be incremented. With a high difficulty the test-only functions are clumsy to handle anyway. For example, the generate* RPCs will return an empty array once they reached `maxtries`, as opposed to an error. Also the calls can't be aborted early unless the node shuts down completely. So I think it is fine to just remove the extra nonce functionality and leave it to the outside to implement, if needed. For example, a wrapper script can call the `generate*` RPCs once every second, to use the timestamp as extra nonce.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK cccc4e879a
Tree-SHA512: d8a3989ad280ebd4b1b574159b3a396b8a42134347e6be3c88445162d86624d221c416456f45ae75aea62ed8c8a1a9bb3a2532924abca2ef7a879cb8e6b15654
The removed code was intended to catch issues with event_enable_debug_logging which was not available prior to libevent 2.1.1. This is not necessary since the minimum libevent version was bumped to 2.1.8.
71038a151e rpc: Fix documentation assertion for `getrawtransaction` (laanwj)
Pull request description:
When `getrawtransaction` is successfully used on a coinbase transaction, there is an assertion error. This is very unlikely but happens in the `interface_usdt_utxocache.py` test in #24358.
This does the following:
- Add missing "coinbase" documentation.
- Synchronize documentation between `getrawtransaction` and `decoderawtransaction`, the two users of `TxToUniv` that have detailed documentation. `decodepsbt` and `getblock` also uses it but fortunately elides this block.
- Change "vout[].amount" to `STR_AMOUNT` for consistency.
- Add maintainer comment to keep the two places synchronized. It might be possible to get smarter with deduplication, but there are some extra fields that prevent the obvious way.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 71038a151e
Tree-SHA512: 962236130455d805190ff9a5c971e4e25c17db35614a90ce340264ec953b0ad7fb814eb33ae430b5073955a8a350f72bdd67ba93e35f9c70e5175b836a767a35
When `getrawtransaction` is successfully used on a coinbase transaction,
there is an assertion error. This is very unlikely but happens in the
test in #24358.
This does the following:
- Add missing "coinbase" documentation.
- Synchronize documentation between `getrawtransaction` and
`decoderawtransaction`, the two users of `TxToUniv` that have detailed
documentation. `decodepsbt` also uses it but fortunately elides this block.
- Change "vout[].amount" to `STR_AMOUNT` for consistency.
- Add maintainer comment to keep the two places synchronized. It might
be possible to get smarter with deduplication, but there are some
extra fields that prevent the obvious way.
bb84b7145b add tests for no recipient and using send_max while inputs are specified (ishaanam)
49090ec402 Add sendall RPC née sweep (Murch)
902793c777 Extract FinishTransaction from send() (Murch)
6d2208a3f6 Extract interpretation of fee estimation arguments (Murch)
a31d75e5fb Elaborate error messages for outdated options (Murch)
35ed094e4b Extract prevention of outdated option names (Murch)
Pull request description:
Add sendall RPC née sweep
_Motivation_
Currently, the wallet uses a fSubtractFeeAmount (SFFO) flag on the
recipients objects for all forms of sending calls. According to the
commit discussion, this flag was chiefly introduced to permit sweeping
without manually calculating the fees of transactions. However, the flag
leads to unintuitive behavior and makes it more complicated to test
many wallet RPCs exhaustively. We proposed to introduce a dedicated
`sendall` RPC with the intention to cover this functionality.
Since the proposal, it was discovered in further discussion that our
proposed `sendall` rpc and SFFO have subtly different scopes of
operation.
• sendall:
Use _given UTXOs_ to pay a destination the remainder after fees.
• SFFO:
Use a _given budget_ to pay an address the remainder after fees.
While `sendall` will simplify cases of spending a given set of
UTXOs such as paying the value from one or more specific UTXOs, emptying
a wallet, or burning dust, we realized that there are some cases in
which SFFO is used to pay other parties from a limited budget,
which can often lead to the creation of change outputs. This cannot be
easily replicated using `sendall` as it would require manual
computation of the appropriate change amount.
As such, sendall cannot replace all uses of SFFO, but it still has a
different use case and will aid in simplifying some wallet calls and
numerous wallet tests.
_Sendall call details_
The proposed sendall call builds a transaction from a specific
subset of the wallet's UTXO pool (by default all of them) and assigns
the funds to one or more receivers. Receivers can either be specified
with a given amount or receive an equal share of the remaining
unassigned funds. At least one recipient must be provided without
assigned amount to collect the remainder. The `sendall` call will
never create change. The call has a `send_max` option that changes the
default behavior of spending all UTXOs ("no UTXO left behind"), to
maximizing the output amount of the transaction by skipping uneconomic
UTXOs. The `send_max` option is incompatible with providing a specific
set of inputs.
---
Edit: Replaced OP with latest commit message to reflect my updated motivation of the proposal.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK bb84b7145b
Tree-SHA512: 20aaf75d268cb4b144f5d6437d33ec7b5f989256b3daeeb768ae1e7f39dc6b962af8223c5cb42ecc72dc38cecd921c53c077bc0ec300b994e902412213dd2cc3
_Motivation_
Currently, the wallet uses a fSubtractFeeAmount (SFFO) flag on the
recipients objects for all forms of sending calls. According to the
commit discussion, this flag was chiefly introduced to permit sweeping
without manually calculating the fees of transactions. However, the flag
leads to unintuitive behavior and makes it more complicated to test
many wallet RPCs exhaustively. We proposed to introduce a dedicated
`sendall` RPC with the intention to cover this functionality.
Since the proposal, it was discovered in further discussion that our
proposed `sendall` rpc and SFFO have subtly different scopes of
operation.
• sendall:
Use _specific UTXOs_ to pay a destination the remainder after fees.
• SFFO:
Use a _specific budget_ to pay an address the remainder after fees.
While `sendall` will simplify cases of spending from specific UTXOs,
emptying a wallet, or burning dust, we realized that there are some
cases in which SFFO is used to pay other parties from a limited budget,
which can often lead to the creation of change outputs. This cannot be
easily replicated using `sendall` as it would require manual computation
of the appropriate change amount.
As such, sendall cannot replace all uses of SFFO, but it still has a
different use case and will aid in simplifying some wallet calls and
numerous wallet tests.
_Sendall call details_
The proposed sendall call builds a transaction from a specific subset of
the wallet's UTXO pool (by default all of them) and assigns the funds to
one or more receivers. Receivers can either be specified with a specific
amount or receive an equal share of the remaining unassigned funds. At
least one recipient must be provided without assigned amount to collect
the remainder. The `sendall` call will never create change. The call has
a `send_max` option that changes the default behavior of spending all
UTXOs ("no UTXO left behind"), to maximizing the output amount of the
transaction by skipping uneconomic UTXOs. The `send_max` option is
incompatible with providing a specific set of inputs.
fc892c3a80 rpc: Fail to return undocumented or misdocumented JSON (MarcoFalke)
f4bc4a705a rpc: Add m_skip_type_check to RPCResult (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This avoids documentation shortcomings such as the ones fixed in commit e7b6272b30, 138d55e6a0, 577bd51a4b, f8c84e047c, 0ee9a00f90, 13f41855c5, or faecb2ee0a
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fc892c3a80 - tested that this catches issue, i.e #24691:
Tree-SHA512: 9d0d7e6291bfc6f67541a4ff746d374ad8751fefcff6d103d8621c0298b190ab1d209ce96cfc3a0d4a6a5460a9f9bb790eb96027b16e5ff91f2512e40c92ca84
fac5a51c47 Move mempool RPCs to rpc/mempool (MarcoFalke)
fa0f666dd7 style: Add static keyword where possible in rpc/mempool (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This moves the remaining mempool RPCs to `rpc/mempool`. Previously all mempool RPCs from the `blockchain` category have been moved. This patch moves the ones from the `rawtransactions` category.
In the future, as a follow-up to this refactoring patch, it could be considered whether a new `mempool` category should be introduced.
Beside a clearer code organization, this pull request should also reduce the compile time and space of the `rawtransactions.cpp` file.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK fac5a51c47.
Tree-SHA512: 5578b894b68d0595869a9b03ed8dceebe3366f73dec5f090ccc36ff4002b1bc4d58af77546c2d71537c1be03694d9a28c4b1bfbb3569560997879293c5c0301e
1066d10f71 scripted-diff: rename TxRelay members (John Newbery)
575bbd0dea [net processing] Move tx relay data to Peer (John Newbery)
785f55f7ee [net processing] Move m_wtxid_relay to Peer (John Newbery)
36346703f8 [net] Add CNode.m_relays_txs and CNode.m_bloom_filter_loaded (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This continues the work of moving application layer data into net_processing, by moving all tx data into the new Peer object added in #19607.
For motivation, see #19398.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
ACK 1066d10f71 - This is a good layer separation improvement with no behavior changes.
glozow:
utACK 1066d10f71
Tree-SHA512: 0c9d6b8a0a05e2d816b6d6588b7df133842ec960ae67667813422aa7bd8eb5308599c714f3822a98ddbdf364ffab9050b055079277ba4aff24092557ff99ebcc
faf37c217a rpc: Exclude descriptor when address is excluded (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
I don't think output descriptors should be used to describe redeem scripts and witness scripts.
Fix this by excluding them when it doesn't make sense.
This should only affect the `decodepsbt` RPC.
Found by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23083
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK faf37c217a
jonatack:
ACK faf37c217a
Tree-SHA512: ebd581ad639e70080e26028723fed287caa3fa4d7b836936645020d6cd9b7586585d7113b043442c444a9dc90c23b93efd7f8b8a7d6cf5db1e42137b67c497c3
fa2d176016 Move txoutproof RPCs to txoutproof.cpp (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The txoutproof RPCs don't really fit into `rawtransaction.cpp`, as they deal with txids, not with raw transactions. As they are placed in the `blockchain` RPC category, they could be moved there. However, `blockchain.cpp` already takes about 20 seconds to compile (and `rawtransaction.cpp` even longer), so move them to a separate file.
Can be reviewed with `--color-moved=dimmed-zebra --color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space`.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa2d176016
theStack:
Concept and code-review ACK fa2d176016
Tree-SHA512: 6250e5f87b6237f604d69643f9a809b238702d73f041792c537aeadeafdb60ab8e0dca1d83347d0d6c85900ce179df14365ae303ca3930ed33a528a862f85aa3
facd5d92e1 doc: Fix getblockchaininfo/getdeploymentinfo RPC docs (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Also, fix whitespace to be `4` spaces. Can be reviewed with `--ignore-all-space --word-diff-regex=.`.
Found by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23083
ACKs for top commit:
luke-jr:
crACK facd5d92e1
Tree-SHA512: 113228a6b140009cecd9068fb634d352148670589f647350e41c02a35e0ca306b4a2d3f2588cd9ef14a2ab7d1f23d0d2f83b5ebb00b60f17a1d16a8d71386fd2
f865cf8ded Add and use BlockManager::GetAllBlockIndices (Carl Dong)
28ba0313ea Add and use CBlockIndexHeightOnlyComparator (Carl Dong)
12eb05df63 move-only: Move CBlockIndexWorkComparator to blockstorage (Carl Dong)
c600ee3816 Only load BlockMan in BlockMan member functions (Carl Dong)
42e56d9b18 style-only: No need for std::pair for vSortedByHeight (Carl Dong)
3bbb6fea05 style-only: Various blockstorage.cpp cleanups (Carl Dong)
5be9ee3c54 refactor: more const annotations for uses of CBlockIndex* (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
The only important commit is "Only load BlockMan in BlockMan member functions", everything else is all just small style changes.
Here's the commit message, reproduced:
```
This commit effectively splits the "load block index itself" logic from
"derive Chainstate variables from loaded block index" logic.
This means that BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex{,DB} will only load what's
relevant to the BlockManager.
```
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK f865cf8ded ; code review only
MarcoFalke:
review ACK f865cf8ded 🗂
Tree-SHA512: 7b204d782834e06fd7329d022e2ae860181b4e8105c33bfb928539a4ec24161dc7438a9c4d4ee279dcad77de310c160b997bb8aa18923243d0fd55ccf4ad7c3a
fad4c8934c Add RegisterMempoolRPCCommands helper (MarcoFalke)
fafd40b541 refactor: Avoid int64_t -> size_t -> int64_t conversion (MarcoFalke)
fa2a5f301a rpc: Move mempool RPCs to new file (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `blockchain.cpp` file is quite large. This makes it harder to navigate and increases the memory required to compile.
Improve on both issues by splitting up the mempool RPCs to a separate file.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK fad4c8934c.
theStack:
Code-review ACK fad4c8934c🏞️
Tree-SHA512: 7f13168ea2cbea51eaef05ca1604fddc919480a2128ec7fa6b1f9365ec5e4822c3df93eb408a19f038c627f2309fa282b9f7f7ec45e5e661fc728f6b33157f89
