5a77abd4e6 [style] Clean up BroadcastTransaction() (John Newbery)
7282d4c036 [test] Allow rebroadcast for same-txid-different-wtxid transactions (glozow)
cd48372b67 [mempool] Allow rebroadcast for same-txid-different-wtxid transactions (John Newbery)
847b6ed48d [test] Test transactions are not re-added to unbroadcast set (Duncan Dean)
2837a9f1ea [mempool] Only add a transaction to the unbroadcast set when it's added to the mempool (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
1. Only add a transaction to the unbroadcast set when it's added to the mempool
Currently, if BroadcastTransaction() is called to rebroadcast a
transaction (e.g. by ResendWalletTransactions()), then we add the
transaction to the unbroadcast set. That transaction has already been
broadcast in the past, so peers are unlikely to request it again,
meaning RemoveUnbroadcastTx() won't be called and it won't be removed
from m_unbroadcast_txids.
Net processing will therefore continue to attempt rebroadcast for the
transaction every 10-15 minutes. This will most likely continue until
the node connects to a new peer which hasn't yet seen the transaction
(or perhaps indefinitely).
Fix by only adding the transaction to the broadcast set when it's added to the mempool.
2. Allow rebroadcast for same-txid-different-wtxid transactions
There is some slightly unexpected behaviour when:
- there is already transaction in the mempool (the "mempool tx")
- BroadcastTransaction() is called for a transaction with the same txid
as the mempool transaction but a different witness (the "new tx")
Prior to this commit, if BroadcastTransaction() is called with
relay=true, then it'll call RelayTransaction() using the txid/wtxid of
the new tx, not the txid/wtxid of the mempool tx. For wtxid relay peers,
in SendMessages(), the wtxid of the new tx will be taken from
setInventoryTxToSend, but will then be filtered out from the vector of
wtxids to announce, since m_mempool.info() won't find the transaction
(the mempool contains the mempool tx, which has a different wtxid from
the new tx).
Fix this by calling RelayTransaction() with the wtxid of the mempool
transaction in this case.
The third commit is a comment/whitespace only change to tidy up the BroadcastTransaction() function.
ACKs for top commit:
duncandean:
reACK 5a77abd
naumenkogs:
ACK 5a77abd4e6
theStack:
re-ACK 5a77abd4e6
lsilva01:
re-ACK 5a77abd4e6
Tree-SHA512: d1a46d32a9f975220e5b432ff6633fac9be01ea41925b4958395b8d641680500dc44476b12d18852e5b674d2d87e4d0160b4483e45d3d149176bdff9f4dc8516
5730a43703 test: Add functional test for AddrFetch connections (Martin Zumsande)
c34ad3309f net, rpc: Enable AddrFetch connections for functional testing (Martin Zumsande)
533500d907 p2p: Add timeout for AddrFetch peers (Martin Zumsande)
b6c5d1e450 p2p: AddrFetch - don't disconnect on self-announcements (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
AddrFetch connections (old name: oneshots) are intended to be short-lived connections on which we ask a peer for addresses via `getaddr` and disconnect after receiving them.
This is done by disconnecting after receiving the first `addr`. However, it is no longer working as intended, because nowadays, the first `addr` a typical bitcoin core node sends is its self-announcement.
So we'll disconnect before the peer gets a chance to answer our `getaddr`.
I checked that this affects both `-seednode` peers specified manually, and DNS seeds when AddrFetch is used as a fallback if DNS doesn't work for us.
The current behavior of getting peers via AddrFetch when starting with an empty addrman would be to connect to the peer, receive its self-announcement and add it to addrman, disconnect, reconnect to the same peer again as a full outbound (no other addresses in addrman) and then receive more `addr`. This is silly and not in line with AddrFetch peer being intended to be short-lived peers.
Fix this by only disconnecting after receiving an `addr` message of size > 1.
[Edit] As per review discussion, this PR now also adds a timeout after which we disconnect if we haven't received any suitable `addr`, and a functional test.
ACKs for top commit:
amitiuttarwar:
reACK 5730a43703
naumenkogs:
ACK 5730a43703
jnewbery:
ACK 5730a43703
Tree-SHA512: 8a81234f37e827705138eb254223f7f3b3bf44a06cb02126fc7990b0d231b9bd8f07d38d185cc30d55bf35548a6fdc286b69602498d875b937e7c58332158bf9
Adds a test for the condition which can trigger a lock order assertion.
Specifically, there must be an unconfirmed transaction in the mempool
which belongs to the wallet being loaded. This will establish the order
of cs_wallet -> cs_main -> cs_KeyStore. Then dumpwallet is called on
that wallet. Previously, this would have used a lock order of cs_wallet
-> cs_KeyStore -> cs_main, but this should be fixed now. The test
ensures that.
a4bcd687c9 Improve tests using statistics (John Newbery)
f424d601e1 Add logging and addr rate limiting statistics (Pieter Wuille)
b4ece8a1cd Functional tests for addr rate limiting (Pieter Wuille)
5648138f59 Randomize the order of addr processing (Pieter Wuille)
0d64b8f709 Rate limit the processing of incoming addr messages (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
The rate at which IP addresses are rumoured (through ADDR and ADDRV2 messages) on the network seems to vary from 0 for some non-participating nodes, to 0.005-0.025 addr/s for recent Bitcoin Core nodes. However, the current codebase will happily accept and process an effectively unbounded rate from attackers. There are measures to limit the influence attackers can have on the addrman database (bucket restrictions based on source IPs), but still - there is no need to permit them to feed us addresses at a rate that's orders of magnitude larger than what is common on the network today, especially as it will cause us to spam our peers too.
This PR implements a [token bucket](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Token_bucket) based rate limiter, allowing an average of 0.1 addr/s per connection, with bursts up to 1000 addresses at once. Whitelisted peers as well as responses to GETADDR requests are exempt from the limit. New connections start with 1 token, so as to not interfere with the common practice of peers' self-announcement.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK a4bcd687c9
vasild:
ACK a4bcd687c9
jnewbery:
ACK a4bcd687c9
jonatack:
ACK a4bcd687c9
Tree-SHA512: b757de76ad78a53035b622944c4213b29b3b55d3d98bf23585afa84bfba10808299d858649f92269a16abfa75eb4366ea047eae3216f7e2f6d3c455782a16bea
-> remove unneeded get-out-of IBD generate()
(The test framework already sets up the nodes to be out of IBD
in setup_nodes(), if setup_clean_chain is not set to True)
-> remove duplicate code line assigning an utxo
By whitelisting the peers via -whitelist, the inventory is transmissioned
immediately rather than on average every 5 seconds, speeding up the test by at
least a factor of two:
before:
$ time ./wallet_listtransactions.py
...
0m40.25s real 0m01.74s user 0m01.70s system
with this PR:
$ time ./wallet_listtransactions.py
...
0m14.93s real 0m01.68s user 0m01.87s system
This commit also moves the wallet_listtransactions tests into the < 30s group.
While limitations on the influence of attackers on addrman already
exist (affected buckets are restricted to a subset based on incoming
IP / network group), there is no reason to permit them to let them
feed us addresses at more than a multiple of the normal network
rate.
This commit introduces a "token bucket" rate limiter for the
processing of addresses in incoming ADDR and ADDRV2 messages.
Every connection gets an associated token bucket. Processing an
address in an ADDR or ADDRV2 message from non-whitelisted peers
consumes a token from the bucket. If the bucket is empty, the
address is ignored (it is not forwarded or processed). The token
counter increases at a rate of 0.1 tokens per second, and will
accrue up to a maximum of 1000 tokens (the maximum we accept in a
single ADDR or ADDRV2). When a GETADDR is sent to a peer, it
immediately gets 1000 additional tokens, as we actively desire many
addresses from such peers (this may temporarily cause the token
count to exceed 1000).
The rate limit of 0.1 addr/s was chosen based on observation of
honest nodes on the network. Activity in general from most nodes
is either 0, or up to a maximum around 0.025 addr/s for recent
Bitcoin Core nodes. A few (self-identified, through subver) crawler
nodes occasionally exceed 0.1 addr/s.
7593b06bd1 test: ensure I2P addresses are relayed (Vasil Dimov)
e7468139a1 test: make CAddress in functional tests comparable (Vasil Dimov)
33e211d2a4 test: implement ser/unser of I2P addresses in functional tests (Vasil Dimov)
86742811ce test: use NODE_* constants instead of magic numbers (Vasil Dimov)
ba45f02708 net: relay I2P addresses even if not reachable (by us) (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Nodes that can reach the I2P network (have set `-i2psam=`) will relay
I2P addresses even without this patch. However, nodes that can't reach
the I2P network will not. This was done as a precaution in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20119 before anybody could
connect to I2P because then, for sure, it would have been useless.
Now, however, we have I2P support and a bunch of I2P nodes, so get all
nodes on the network to relay I2P addresses to help with propagation,
similarly to what we do with Tor addresses.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 7593b06bd1
naumenkogs:
ACK 7593b06bd1.
laanwj:
Code review ACK 7593b06bd1
kristapsk:
ACK 7593b06bd1. Code looks correct, tested that functional test suite passes and also that `test/functional/p2p_addrv2_replay.py` fails if I undo changes in `IsRelayable()`.
Tree-SHA512: c9feec4a9546cc06bc2fec6d74f999a3c0abd3d15b7c421c21fcf2d610eb94611489e33d61bdcd5a4f42041a6d84aa892f7ae293b0d4f755309a8560b113b735
a3d6ec5bb5 test: move rpc_rawtransaction tests to < 30s group (Jon Atack)
5a1ed96077 test: whitelist rpc_rawtransaction peers to speed up tests (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Speed up the somewhat slow `rpc_rawtransaction.py` test by more than 3x (from 45-55 seconds to 15 seconds on a laptop running 2 x 2.5GHz).
ACKs for top commit:
mjdietzx:
ACK a3d6ec5bb5
kristapsk:
ACK a3d6ec5bb5
theStack:
ACK a3d6ec5bb5🐎
brunoerg:
tACK a3d6ec5bb5
Tree-SHA512: f1d105594c9b5b257a7096b631a6fa5aeb50e330a351f75c2d6ffa7dd73abdb6e1f596a78c16d204a9bac3fe506e0519f9ad96bb8477ab6424c8e18125ccb659
fa80e10d94 test: Add feature_taproot.py --previous_release (MarcoFalke)
85ccffa266 test: move releases download incantation to README (Sjors Provoost)
29d6b1da2a test: previous releases: add v0.20.1 (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Disabling the new consensus code at runtime is fine, but potentially fragile and incomplete. Fix that by giving the option to run with a version that has been compiled without any taproot code.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK fa80e10
NelsonGaldeman:
tACK fa80e10d94
Tree-SHA512: 1a1feef823f08c05268759645a8974e1b2d39a024258f5e6acecbe25097aae3fa9302c27262978b40f1aa8e7b525b60c0047199010f2a5d6017dd6434b4066f0
4101ec9d2e doc: mention that we enforce port=0 in I2P (Vasil Dimov)
e0a2b390c1 addrman: reset I2P ports to 0 when loading from disk (Vasil Dimov)
41cda9d075 test: ensure I2P ports are handled as expected (Vasil Dimov)
4f432bd738 net: do not connect to I2P hosts on port!=0 (Vasil Dimov)
1f096f091e net: distinguish default port per network (Vasil Dimov)
aeac3bce3e net: change I2P seeds' ports to 0 (Vasil Dimov)
38f900290c net: change assumed I2P port to 0 (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
_This is an alternative to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514, inspired by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514#issuecomment-815049933. They are mutually exclusive. Just one of them should be merged._
Change assumed ports for I2P to 0 (instead of the default 8333) as this is closer to what actually happens underneath with SAM 3.1 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514#issuecomment-812632520, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514#issuecomment-816564719).
Don't connect to I2P peers with advertised port != 0 (we don't specify a port to our SAM 3.1 proxy and it always connects to port = 0).
Note, this change:
* Keeps I2P addresses with port != 0 in addrman and relays them to others via P2P gossip. There may be non-bitcoin-core-22.0 peers using SAM 3.2 and for them such addresses may be useful.
* Silently refuses to connect to I2P hosts with port != 0. This is ok for automatically chosen peers from addrman. Not so ok for peers provided via `-addnode` or `-connect` - a user who specifies `foo.b32.i2p:1234` (non zero port) may wonder why "nothing is happening".
Fixes#21389
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 4101ec9d2e
jonatack:
re-ACK 4101ec9d2e per `git range-diff efff9c3 0b0ee03 4101ec9`, built with DDEBUG_ADDRMAN, did fairly extensive testing on mainnet both with and without a peers.dat / -dnsseeds=0 to test boostrapping.
Tree-SHA512: 0e3c019e1dc05e54f559275859d3450e0c735596d179e30b66811aad9d5b5fabe3dcc44571e8f7b99f9fe16453eee393d6e153454dd873b9ff14907d4e6354fe
2feec3ce31 net: don't bind on 0.0.0.0 if binds are restricted to Tor (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
The semantic of `-bind` is to restrict the binding only to some address.
If not specified, then the user does not care and we bind to `0.0.0.0`.
If specified then we should honor the restriction and bind only to the
specified address.
Before this change, if no `-bind` is given then we would bind to
`0.0.0.0:8333` and to `127.0.0.1:8334` (incoming Tor) which is ok -
the user does not care to restrict the binding.
However, if only `-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary
`-bind=`) then we would bind to `addr:port` _and_ to `0.0.0.0:8333` in
addition.
Change the above to not do the additional bind: if only
`-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary `-bind=`) then bind
to `addr:port` (only) and consider incoming connections to that as Tor
and do not advertise it. I.e. a Tor-only node.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 2feec3ce31
jonatack:
utACK 2feec3ce31 per `git diff a004833 2feec3c`
hebasto:
ACK 2feec3ce31, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64):
Tree-SHA512: a04483af601706da928958b92dc560f9cfcc78ab0bb9d74414636eed1c6f29ed538ce1fb5a17d41ed82c9c9a45ca94899d0966e7ef93da809c9bcdcdb1d1f040
b7a8cd9963 [test] submit same txid different wtxid as mempool tx (glozow)
fdb48163bf [validation] distinguish same txid different wtxid in mempool (glozow)
Pull request description:
On master, if you submit a transaction with the same txid but different witness to the mempool, it thinks the transactions are the same. Users submitting through `BroadcastTransaction()` (i.e. `sendrawtransaction` or the wallet) don't get notified that there's a different transaction in the mempool, although it doesn't crash. Users submitting through `testmempoolaccept()` will get a "txn-already-in-mempool" error.
This PR simply distinguishes between `txn-already-in-mempool` and `txn-same-nonwitness-data-in-mempool`, without handling them differently: `sendrawtransaction` still will not throw, but `testmempoolaccept` will give you a different error.
I believe the intention of #19645 is to allow full swaps of transactions that have different witnesses but identical nonwitness data. Returning a different error message + adding a test was suggested: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19645#issuecomment-705109193 so this is that PR.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK b7a8cd9963
jnewbery:
Code review ACK b7a8cd9963
theStack:
Code-review ACK b7a8cd9963
darosior:
re-utACK b7a8cd9963
Tree-SHA512: 9c6591edaf8727ba5b4675977adb8cbdef7288584003b6cd659828032dc92d2ae915800a8ef8b6fdffe112c1b660df72297a3dcf2e2e3e1f959c6cb3678c63ee
905d672b74 test: use script_util helpers for creating P2W{PKH,SH} scripts (Sebastian Falbesoner)
285a65ccfd test: use script_util helpers for creating P2SH scripts (Sebastian Falbesoner)
b57b633b94 test: use script_util helpers for creating P2PKH scripts (Sebastian Falbesoner)
61b6a017a9 test: wallet util: fix multisig P2SH-P2WSH script creation (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
PR #18788 (commit 08067aebfd) introduced functions to generate output scripts for various types. This PR replaces all manual CScript creations in the P2PKH, P2SH, P2WPKH, P2WSH formats with those helpers in order to increase readability and maintainability over the functional test codebase. The first commit fixes a bug in the wallet_util helper module w.r.t. to P2SH-P2WSH script creation (the result is not used in any test so far, hence it can still be seen as refactoring).
The following table shows a summary of the output script patterns tackled in this PR:
| Type | master branch | PR branch |
| ---------- | ------------- | ------------- |
| P2PKH | `CScript([OP_DUP, OP_HASH160, hash160(key), OP_EQUALVERIFY, OP_CHECKSIG])` | `key_to_p2pkh_script(key)` |
| | `CScript([OP_DUP, OP_HASH160, keyhash, OP_EQUALVERIFY, OP_CHECKSIG])` | `keyhash_to_p2pkh_script(keyhash)` |
| P2SH | `CScript([OP_HASH160, hash160(script), OP_EQUAL])` | `script_to_p2sh_script(script)` |
| P2WPKH | `CScript([OP_0, hash160(key)])` | `key_to_p2wpkh_script(key)` |
| P2WSH | `CScript([OP_0, sha256(script)])` | `script_to_p2wsh_script(script)` |
Note that the `key_to_...` helpers can't be used if an invalid key size (not 33 or 65 bytes) is passed, which is the case in some rare instances where the scripts still have to be created manually.
Possible follow-up ideas:
* further simplify by identifying P2SH-wrapped scripts and using `key_to_p2sh_p2wpkh_script()` and `script_to_p2sh_p2wsh_script()` helpers
* introduce and use `key_to_p2pk_script()` helper for P2PK scripts
ACKs for top commit:
rajarshimaitra:
tACK 905d672b74
LarryRuane:
tACK 905d672b74
0xB10C:
ACK 905d672b74
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 905d672b74 🕹
Tree-SHA512: 7ccfe69699bc81168ac122b03536720013355c1b2fbb088355b616015318644c4d1cd27e20c4f56c89ad083ae609add4bc838cf6316794d0edb0ce9cf7fa0fd8
The semantic of `-bind` is to restrict the binding only to some address.
If not specified, then the user does not care and we bind to `0.0.0.0`.
If specified then we should honor the restriction and bind only to the
specified address.
Before this change, if no `-bind` is given then we would bind to
`0.0.0.0:8333` and to `127.0.0.1:8334` (incoming Tor) which is ok -
the user does not care to restrict the binding.
However, if only `-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary
`-bind=`) then we would bind to `addr:port` _and_ to `0.0.0.0:8333` in
addition.
Change the above to not do the additional bind: if only
`-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary `-bind=`) then bind
to `addr:port` (only) and consider incoming connections to that as Tor
and do not advertise it. I.e. a Tor-only node.
This reject reason is triggered for non-coinbase transactions with
a coinbase-like outpoint, i.e. hash=0, n=0xffffffff.
Note that the invalid tx templates are currently used in the
functional tests feature_block.py and p2p_invalid_tx.py.
The constant `MAX_BLOCK_BASE_SIZE` has been removed from the
core implementation years ago due to being confusing and
superfluous, as it is implied by the block weight limit (see
PRs #10618 and #10608). Since there is also no point in
still keeping it in the functional test framework, we switch
to weight-based accounting on the relevant test code parts
and use `MAX_BLOCK_WEIGHT` instead for the block limit
checks.
c4ddee64c7 test: Add test for replacement relay fee check (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
This PR adds rename the `reject_reason` of our implementation of BIP125 rule 4 and adds missing functional test coverage. Note, `insufficient fee` is already the `reject_reason` of few others `PreChecks` replacement checks and as such might be confusing.
> The replacement transaction must also pay for its own bandwidth at or above the rate set by the node's minimum relay fee setting. For example, if the minimum relay fee is 1 satoshi/byte and the replacement transaction is 500 bytes total, then the replacement must pay a fee at least 500 satoshis higher than the sum of the originals.
```
// Finally in addition to paying more fees than the conflicts the
// new transaction must pay for its own bandwidth.
CAmount nDeltaFees = nModifiedFees - nConflictingFees;
if (nDeltaFees < ::incrementalRelayFee.GetFee(nSize))
{
return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, "insufficient fee",
strprintf("rejecting replacement %s, not enough additional fees to relay; %s < %s",
hash.ToString(),
FormatMoney(nDeltaFees),
FormatMoney(::incrementalRelayFee.GetFee(nSize))));
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK c4ddee64c7
glozow:
ACK c4ddee6, one small suggestion if you retouch.
Tree-SHA512: 7c5d1065db6e6fe57a9f083bf051a7a55eb9892de3a2888679d4a6853491608c93b6e35887ef383a9988d14713fa13a0b1d6134b7354af5fd54765f0d4e98568
3efaf83c75 wallet: deactivate descriptor (S3RK)
6737d9655b test: wallet importdescriptors update existing (S3RK)
586f1d53d6 wallet: maintain SPK consistency on internal flag change (S3RK)
f1b7db1474 wallet: don't mute exceptions in importdescriptors (S3RK)
bf68ebc1cd wallet: allow to import same descriptor twice (S3RK)
Pull request description:
Rationale: allow updating existing descriptors with `importdescriptors` command.
Currently if you run same `importdescriptors` command twice with a descriptor containing private key you will get very confusing error — `Missing required fields`. What happens is that Wallet tries to write imported private key to the disk, but it exists already so we get `DB_KEYEXIST (-30995)` from BerkelyDB. Please note, that we set `DB_NOOVERWRITE` (I guess not to lose some keys accidentally). The exception is caught in `catch (...)` in rpcdump.cpp with a generic error.
With this PR if a descriptor is already present than we will update its activeness, internalness, label, range and next_index.
For the range only expansion is allowed (range start can only decrease, range end increase).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 3efaf83c75
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 3efaf83c75
jonatack:
Light ACK 3efaf83c75 per `git range-diff a000cb0 5d96704 3efaf83` and as a sanity check, re-debug-built on debian with gcc 10.2.1 and clang 11, ran wallet_importdescriptors.py
Tree-SHA512: 122c4b621d64ec8a3b625f3aed9f01a2b5cbaf2029ad0325b5ff38d67fff5cd35324335fabe2dd5169548b01b267c81be6ae0f5c834342f3d5f6eeed515c4843
754f134a50 wallet: Add error message to GetReservedDestination (Andrew Chow)
87a0e7a3b7 Disallow bech32m addresses for legacy wallet things (Andrew Chow)
6dbe4d1072 Use BECH32M for tr() desc, WitV1Taproot, and WitUnknown CTxDests (Andrew Chow)
699dfcd8ad Opportunistically use bech32m change addresses if available (Andrew Chow)
0262536c34 Add OutputType::BECH32M (Andrew Chow)
177c15d2f7 Limit LegacyScriptPubKeyMan address types (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently bech32m addresses are classfied as bech32. Because bech32m is incompatible with bech32, we need to define a new `OutputType` for it so that it can be handled correctly. This PR adds `OutputType::BECH32M`, updates all of the relevant `OutputType` classifications, and handle requests for bech32m addresses. There is now a `bech32m` address type string that can be used.
* `tr()` descriptors now report their output type as `OutputType::BECH32M`. `WtinessV1Taproot` and `WitnessUnknown` are also classified as `OutputType::BECH32M`.
* Bech32m addresses are completely disabled for legacy wallets. They cannot be imported (explicitly disallowed in `importaddress` and `importmulti`), will not be created when getting all destinations for a pubkey, and will not be added with `addmultisigaddress`. Additional protections have been added to `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan` to disallow attempting to retrieve bech32m addresses.
* Since Taproot multisigs are not implemented yet, `createmultisig` will also disallow the bech32m address type.
* As Taproot is not yet active, `DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan` cannot and will not create a `tr()` descriptor. Protections have been added to make sure this cannot occur.
* The change address type detection algorithm has been updated to return `bech32m` when there is a segwit v1+ output script and the wallet has a bech32m `ScriptPubKeyMan`, falling back to bech32 if one is not available.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
re-review ACK 754f134a50
Sjors:
re-utACK 754f134: only change is switching to `bech32m` in two `wallet_taproot.py` test cases.
fjahr:
re-ACK 754f134a50
jonatack:
ACK 754f134a50
Tree-SHA512: 6ea90867d3631d0d438e2b08ce6ed930f37d01323224661e8e38f183ea5ee2ab65b5891394a3612c7382a1aff907b457616c6725665a10c320174017b998ca9f
fadddd13ee test: Add missing syncwithvalidationinterfacequeue (MarcoFalke)
faa211fc6e test: Misc cleanup (MarcoFalke)
fa1668bf50 test: Run pep-8 (MarcoFalke)
facd97ae0f scripted-diff: Renames (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The index on the block filters is running in the background on the validation interface. To avoid intermittent test failures, it needs to be synced.
Also other cleanups.
ACKs for top commit:
lsilva01:
Tested ACK fadddd13ee on Ubuntu 20.04
Tree-SHA512: d858405db426a2f9d5620059dd88bcead4e3fba3ccc6bd8023f624b768fbcfa2203246fb0b2db620490321730d990f0e78063b21a26988c969cb126d4bd697bd
bdb8b9a347 test: doc: improve doc for `from_hex` helper (mention `to_hex` alternative) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
1914054208 scripted-diff: test: rename `FromHex` to `from_hex` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a79396fe5f test: remove `ToHex` helper, use .serialize().hex() instead (Sebastian Falbesoner)
2ce7b47958 test: introduce `tx_from_hex` helper for tx deserialization (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
There are still many functional tests that perform conversions from a hex-string to a message object (deserialization) manually. This PR identifies all those instances and replaces them with a newly introduced helper `tx_from_hex`.
Instances were found via
* `git grep "deserialize.*BytesIO"`
and some of them manually, when it were not one-liners.
Further, the helper `ToHex` was removed and simply replaced by `.serialize().hex()`, since now both variants are in use (sometimes even within the same test) and using the helper doesn't really have an advantage in readability. (see discussion https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22257#discussion_r652404782)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review re-ACK bdb8b9a347😁
Tree-SHA512: e25d7dc85918de1d6755a5cea65471b07a743204c20ad1c2f71ff07ef48cc1b9ad3fe5f515c1efaba2b2e3d89384e7980380c5d81895f9826e2046808cd3266e
6168eb06b2 [test] Prevent intermittent issue (Amiti Uttarwar)
1d8193e2a2 [test] Remove GetAddrStore class (Amiti Uttarwar)
ef2f149bf2 [test] Update GetAddrStore callers to use AddrReceiver (Amiti Uttarwar)
e8c67ea19a [test] Add functionality to AddrReceiver (Amiti Uttarwar)
09dc073cff [test] Allow AddrReceiver to be used more generally (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
A test refactor broken out from #21528 & a fix to #22243.
This PR:
1. consolidates the two helper classes into one, with the intent of making the test logic more clear & usable as we add more subtests to the file
2. hopefully fixes the test flakiness by bumping up the mocktime interval to ensure `m_next_addr_send` timer triggers
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code-Review ACK 6168eb06b2
lsilva01:
Tested ACK 6168eb06b2 on Ubuntu 20.04
brunoerg:
tACK 6168eb06b2
Tree-SHA512: 248324f9d37e0e5ffe4acc437cd72ad9a2960abc868a97c6040a36e6ea8b59029127ac4f63fcf67d981a5bb4dbf2334bb2c23c541fae8e910d5523884bcedcba
d637a9b397 Taproot descriptor inference (Pieter Wuille)
c7388e5ada Report address as solvable based on inferred descriptor (Pieter Wuille)
29e5dd1a5b consensus refactor: extract ComputeTapleafHash, ComputeTaprootMerkleRoot (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Includes:
* First commit from #21365, adding TaprootSpendData in SigningProvider
* A refactor to expose ComputeTapleafHash and ComputeTaprootMerkleRoot from script/interpreter
* A tiny change to make `getaddressinfo` report tr() descriptors as solvable (so that inferred descriptors are shown), despite not having signing code for them.
* Logic to infer the script tree back from TaprootSpendData, and then use that to infer descriptors.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK d637a9b397
Sjors:
re-utACK d637a9b
meshcollider:
Code review ACK d637a9b397
Tree-SHA512: 5ab9b95da662382d8549004be4a1297a577d7caca6b068f875c7c9343723931d03fa9cbf133de11f83b74e4851490ce820fb80413c77b9e8495a5f812e505d86
bb719a08db style: remove () from assert in rpc_setban.py (Vasil Dimov)
24b10ebda3 doc: fix grammar in doc/files.md (Vasil Dimov)
dd4e957dcd test: ensure banlist can be read from disk after restart (Vasil Dimov)
d197977ae2 banman: save the banlist in a JSON format on disk (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Save the banlist in `banlist.json` instead of `banlist.dat`.
This makes it possible to store Tor v3 entries in the banlist on disk
(and any other addresses that cannot be serialized in addrv1 format).
Only read `banlist.dat` if it exists and `banlist.json` does not exist (first start after an upgrade).
Supersedes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20904
Resolves https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19748
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Code review re-ACK bb719a08db per `git range-diff 6a67366 4b52c72 bb719a0`
achow101:
Code Review ACK bb719a08db
Tree-SHA512: fc135c3a1fe20bcf5d008ce6bea251b4135e56c78bf8f750b4bd8144c095b81ffe165133cdc7e4715875eec7e7c4e13ad9f5d2450b21102af063d7c8abf716b6
fafd9165e9 test: Add missing sync_all to feature_coinstatsindex (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Sync the blocks before invalidating them to ensure all nodes are on the right tip. Otherwise nodes[0] might stay on the "stale" block and the test fails (intermittently)
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
crACK fafd9165e9
Tree-SHA512: ca567b97b839b56c91d52831eaac18d8c843d376be90c9fd8b49d2eb4a46b801a1d2402996d5dfe2bef3e2c9bd75d19ed443e3f42cc4679c5f20043ba556efc8
Adds an error output parameter to all GetReservedDestination functions
so that callers can get the actual reason that a change address could
not be fetched. This more closely matches GetNewDestination. This allows
for more granular error messages, such as one that indicates that
bech32m addresses cannot be generated yet.
We don't want the legacy wallet to ever have bech32m addresses so don't
allow importing them. This includes addmultisigaddress as that is a
legacy wallet only RPC
Additionally, bech32m multisigs are not available yet, so disallow them
in createmultisig.
The `on_addr` functionality of `AddrReceiver` tests logic specific to how the
addr messages are set up in the test bodies. To allow other callers to also use
`AddrReceiver`, only apply the assertion logic if the caller indicates
desirability by setting `test_addr_contents` to true when initializing the
class.
testshell in jupyter was failing due to an extra arg.
this adds a dummy -f param, which allows TestShell to
be used in a command line or jupyter environment
d6d2ab9845 test: MiniWallet: fix fee calculation for P2PK and check tx vsize (Sebastian Falbesoner)
ce024b1c0e test: MiniWallet: force P2PK signature to have fixed size (71 bytes) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR is a follow-up to #21945. It aims to both fix the fee calculation for P2PK mode transactions and enable its vsize check. Currently, the latter assumes a fixed tx length, which is fine for anyone-can-spend txs but doesn't apply to P2PK output spends due to varying DER signature size; the vsize check is therefore disabled for P2PK mode on master branch.
Creating one million DER signatures with MiniWallet shows the following distribution of sizes (smart people with better math skills probably could deduce the ratios without trying, but hey):
| DER signature size [bytes] | #occurences (ratio) |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| 71 | 498893 (49.89%) |
| 70 | 497244 (49.72%) |
| 69 | 3837 (0.38%) |
| 68 | 22 (0.0022%) |
Note that even smaller signatures are possible (for smaller R and S values with leading zero bytes), it's just that the probability decreases exponentially. Instead of choosing a large vsize check range and hoping that smaller signatures are never created (potentially leading to flaky tests), the proposed solution is ~~to limit the signature size to the two most common sizes 71 and 70 (>99.6% probability) and then accordingly only check for two vsize values; the value to be used for fee calculation is a decimal right between the two possible sizes (167.5 vbytes) and for the vsize check it's rounded down/up integer values are used.~~ to simply grind the signature to a fixed size of 71 bytes (49.89% probability, i.e. on average each call to `sign_tx()`, on average two ECC signing operations are needed).
~~The idea of grinding signatures to a fixed size (similar to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13666 which grinds to low-R values) would be counter-productive, as the signature creation in the test suite is quite expensive and this would significantly slow down tests that calculate hundreds of signatures (like e.g. feature_csv_activation.py).~~
For more about transaction sizes on different input/output types, see the following interesting article: https://medium.com/coinmonks/on-bitcoin-transaction-sizes-97e31bc9d816
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
Concept ACK d6d2ab9845
Tree-SHA512: 011c70ee0e4adf9ba12902e4b6c411db9ae96bdd8bc810bf1d67713367998e28ea328394503371fc1f5087a819547ddaea56c073b28db893ae1c0031d7927f32
b9e76f1bf0 rpc: Add test for -rpcwaittimeout (Christian Decker)
f76cb10d7d rpc: Prefix rpcwaittimeout error with details on its nature (Christian Decker)
c490e17ef6 doc: Add release notes for the `-rpcwaittimeout` cli parameter (Christian Decker)
a7fcc8eb59 rpc: Add a `-rpcwaittimeout` parameter to limit time spent waiting (Christian Decker)
Pull request description:
Adds a new numeric `-rpcwaittimeout` that can be used to limit the
time we spend waiting on the RPC server to appear. This is used by
downstream projects to provide a bit of slack when `bitcoind`s RPC
interface is not available right away.
This makes the `-rpcwait` argument more useful, since we can now limit
how long we'll ultimately wait, before potentially giving up and reporting
an error to the caller. It was discussed in the context of the BTCPayServer
wanting to have c-lightning wait for the RPC interface to become available
but still have the option of giving up eventually ([4355]).
I checked with laanwj whether this is already possible ([comment]), and
whether this would be a welcome change. Initially I intended to repurpose
the (optional) argument to `-rpcwait`, however I decided against it since it
would potentially break existing configurations, using things like `rpcwait=1`,
or `rpcwait=true` (the former would have an unintended short timeout, when
old behavior was to wait indefinitely).
~Due to its simplicity I didn't implement a test for it yet, but if that's desired I
can provide one.~ Test was added during reviews.
[4355]: https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/4355
[comment]: https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/4355#issuecomment-768288261
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK b9e76f1bf0
promag:
ACK b9e76f1bf0.
Tree-SHA512: 3cd6728038ec7ca7c35c2e7ccb213bfbe963f99a49bb48bbc1e511c4dd23d9957c04f9af1f8ec57120e47b26eaf580b46817b099d5fc5083c98da7aa92db8638
With `banlist.dat` (being written in addrv1 format) if we would try to
write a Tor v3 subnet, it would serialize as a dummy-all-0s IPv6
address and subsequently, when deserialized will not result in the same
subnet.
This problem does not exist with `banlist.json` where the data is saved
in textual, human-readable form.
30aee2dfe6 tests: Add test for compact block HB selection (Pieter Wuille)
6efbcec4de Protect last outbound HB compact block peer (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
If all our high-bandwidth compact block serving peers (BIP 152) stall block
download, then we can be denied a block for (potentially) a long time. As
inbound connections are much more likely to be adversarial than outbound
connections, mitigate this risk by never removing our last outbound HB peer if
it would be replaced by an inbound.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 30aee2dfe6
ariard:
Code ACK 30aee2dfe
jonatack:
ACK 30aee2dfe6
Tree-SHA512: 5c6c9326e3667b97e0864c371ae2174d2be9054dad479f4366127b9cd3ac60ffa01ec9707b16ef29cac122db6916cf56fd9985733390017134ace483278921d5
fa7d71f270 test: Run pep-8 on touched test (MarcoFalke)
fab7e99c2a test: Use MiniWallet in test_no_inherited_signaling RBF test (MarcoFalke)
fab871f649 test: Remove unused generate() from test (MarcoFalke)
faff3f35b7 test: Add txin.sequence option to MiniWallet (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This comes with nice benefits:
* Less code and complexity
* Test can be run without wallet compiled in
Also add some additional checks for `getmempoolentry` (#22209) and other cleanups 🎨
ACKs for top commit:
mjdietzx:
Tested ACK fa7d71f270 thanks for the explanations, nicely done
theStack:
ACK fa7d71f270🍷
Tree-SHA512: 0e9b8fe985779d8d7034d256deed627125bb374b6ae2972c461b3a220739a51061c6147ad69339bee16282f82716c7f3f8a7a89c693ceb1e47ea50709272332a
55311197c4 Added new test for future blocks reacceptance (sanket1729)
511a5af462 Fixed inconsistencies between code and comments (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
This Commit does 3 things:
1) Adds a test case for checking reacceptance a previously rejected block which
was too far in the future.
~~2) clean up uses of rehash or calc_sha256 where it was not needed~~
3) While constructing block 44, this commit makes the code consistent with the expected figure in
the comment just above it by adding a transaction to the block.
4) Fix comment describing `sign_tx()` function
ACKs for top commit:
duncandean:
reACK 5531119
brunoerg:
reACK 55311197c4
Tree-SHA512: d40c72fcdbb0b2a0715adc58441eeea08147ee2ec5e371a4ccc824ebfdc6450698bd40aaeecb7ea7bfdb3cd1b264dd821b890276fff8b8d89b7225cdd9d6b546
451b96f7d2 test: kill process group to avoid dangling processes (S3RK)
Pull request description:
This is an alternative to #19281
This PR fixes a problem when after test failure with `--failfast` option there could be dangling nodes. The nodes will continue to occupy rpc/p2p ports on the machine and will cause further test failures.
If there are any dangling nodes left at the end of the test run we kill the whole process group.
Pros: the operations is immediate and won't lead to CI timeout
Cons: the test_runner process is also killed and exit code is 137
Example output:
```
...
Early exiting after test failure
TEST | STATUS | DURATION
rpc_decodescript.py | ✓ Passed | 2 s
rpc_deprecated.py | ✓ Passed | 2 s
rpc_deriveaddresses.py | ✓ Passed | 2 s
rpc_dumptxoutset.py | ✖ Failed | 2 s
ALL | ✖ Failed | 8 s (accumulated)
Runtime: 4 s
Killed: 9
> echo $?
137
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 451b96f7d2
aitorjs:
ACK 451b96f7d2. Manual testing with and without **--failfast**.
Tree-SHA512: 87e510a1411b9e7571e63cf7ffc8b9a8935daf9112ffc0f069d6c406ba87743ec439808181f7e13cb97bb200fad528589786c47f0b43cf3a2ef0d06a23cb86dd
458a345b05 Add support for SIGHASH_DEFAULT in RPCs, and make it default (Pieter Wuille)
c0f0c8eccb tests: check spending of P2TR (Pieter Wuille)
a2380127e9 Basic Taproot signing logic in script/sign.cpp (Pieter Wuille)
49487bc3b6 Make GetInputUTXO safer: verify non-witness UTXO match (Pieter Wuille)
fd3f6890f3 Construct and use PrecomputedTransactionData in PSBT signing (Pieter Wuille)
5cb6502ac5 Construct and use PrecomputedTransactionData in SignTransaction (Pieter Wuille)
5d2e22437b Don't nuke witness data when signing fails (Pieter Wuille)
ce9353164b Permit full precomputation in PrecomputedTransactionData (Pieter Wuille)
e841fb503d Add precomputed txdata support to MutableTransactionSignatureCreator (Pieter Wuille)
a91d532338 Add CKey::SignSchnorr function for BIP 340/341 signing (Pieter Wuille)
e77a2839b5 Use HandleMissingData also in CheckSchnorrSignature (Pieter Wuille)
dbb0ce9fbf Add TaprootSpendData data structure, equivalent to script map for P2[W]SH (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Builds on top of #22051, adding signing support after derivation support.
Nothing is changed in descriptor features. Signing works for key path and script path spending, through the normal sending functions, and PSBT-based RPCs. However, PSBT usability is rather low as no extensions have been defined to convey Taproot-specific information, so all script information must be known to the signing wallet.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 458a345b05
fjahr:
Code review ACK 458a345b05
Sjors:
ACK 458a345b05
Tree-SHA512: 30ed212cf7754763a4a81624ebc084c51727b8322711ac0b390369213c1a891d367ed8b123882ac08c99595320c11ec57ee42304ff22a69afdc3d1a0d55cc711
754e802274 test: check rejected future block later accepted (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
(Luke) was unsure if the code sufficiently avoided caching a
time-too-new rejection, so wrote this test to check it. It looks like
despite only exempting BLOCK_MUTATED, it is still okay because header
failures never cache block invalidity. This test will help ensure that
if this ever changes, BLOCK_TIME_FUTURE gets excluded at the same time.
This PR re-opens https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17872 which went stale and addresses the nits raised by reviewers there.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 754e802274
Tree-SHA512: a2bbc8fffb523cf2831e1ecb05f20868e30106a38cc2e369e4973fa549cca06675a668df16f76c49cc4ce3a22925404255e5c53c4232d63ba1b9fca878509aa0
1) Makes the code for block 44 consistent with the expected figure in
the comment above it by adding a transaction to the block
2) Fixed comment describing sign_tx() function
(Luke) was unsure if the code sufficiently avoided caching a
time-too-new rejection, so wrote this test to check it. It looks like
despite only exempting BLOCK_MUTATED, it is still okay because header
failures never cache block invalidity. This test will help ensure that
if this ever changes, BLOCK_TIME_FUTURE gets excluded at the same time.
Co-authored-by: Will Clark <will8clark@gmail.com>
01eedf3821 test: doc: improve doc for chain_transaction() helper (Sebastian Falbesoner)
6e63e366d6 test: refactor: dedup utility function chain_transaction() (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Both tests `mempool_packages.py` and `mempool_package_onemore.py` define a utility function `chain_transaction` with a similar implementation. This PR deduplicates it by moving it into the util package and keeping the more general properties:
* pass a list of parent_txids/vouts instead of single values
* always mark the BIP125-replaceable flag for txs, created via `createrawtransaction` (this is needed by the `mempool_package_onemore.py` test, but doesn't hurt the other one)
This is a low-hanging fruit; as a potential follow-up one could probably also deduplicate the function `chain_transaction` in `rpc_packages.py`, which looks a bit different, as it also takes the parent locking script into account and doesn't send the tx.
ACKs for top commit:
mjdietzx:
reACK 01eedf3821
klementtan:
Code review ACK 01eedf3821
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 01eedf3821🙅
Tree-SHA512: ac7105d02c23f53d76d4ec9dc8de1074dd8faefeecd44b107921b78665279498966152fed312ecbe252a1c34a9643d531166329a4fea0e773df3bb75d43092b0
fbf485c9b2 Allow tr() import only when Taproot is active (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
To avoid issues around fund loss, only allow descriptor wallets to import `tr()` descriptors after taproot has activated.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK fbf485c9b2
fjahr:
Code review ACK fbf485c9b2
laanwj:
Code review ACK fbf485c9b2
prayank23:
utACK fbf485c9b2
Tree-SHA512: 83c43376515eea523dbc89bc5a0fde53e54aec492e49a40c2a33d80fc94aac459e232ae07b024b4bd75b58078c8d090bc7a2d69541c5d3d4834d2f4cfc9c8208
