7a2ecf16df Wallet: Change IsMine check in CWallet::DelAddressBook from assert to failure (Luke Dashjr)
2952c46b92 Wallet: Replace CAddressBookData.name with GetLabel() method (Luke Dashjr)
d7092c392e QA: Test that change doesn't turn into non-change when spent in an avoid-reuse wallet (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #18192, not strictly necessary for 0.20
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 7a2ecf16df, only change is adding an assert_equal in the test 🔰
jnewbery:
utACK 7a2ecf16df
Tree-SHA512: e0933ee40f705b751697dc27249e1868ed4874254b174ebdd0a7150125d8c818402e66df2371718c7eeb90e67ee2317215fb260aa9b9d7b9b45ee436de2988ff
b5795a7886 Wallet: Add warning comments and assert to CWallet::DelAddressBook (Luke Dashjr)
6d2905f57a Wallet: Avoid unnecessary/redundant m_address_book lookups (Luke Dashjr)
c751d886f4 Wallet: Avoid treating change-in-the-addressbook as non-change everywhere (Luke Dashjr)
8e64b8c84b Wallet: New FindAddressBookEntry method to filter out change entries (and skip ->second everywhere) (Luke Dashjr)
65b6bdc2b1 Wallet: Add CAddressBookData::IsChange which returns true iff label has never been set (Luke Dashjr)
144b2f85da Wallet: Require usage of new CAddressBookData::setLabel to change label (Luke Dashjr)
b86cd155f6 scripted-diff: Wallet: Rename mapAddressBook to m_address_book (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
In many places, our code assumes that presence in the address book indicates a non-change key, and absence of an entry in mapAddressBook indicates change.
This no longer holds true after #13756 (first released in 0.19) since it added a "used" DestData populated even for change addresses. Only avoid-reuse wallets should be affected by this issue.
Thankfully, populating DestData does not write a label to the database, so we can retroactively fix this (so long as the user didn't see the change address and manually assign it a real label).
Fixing it is accomplished by:
* Adding a new bool to CAddressBookData to track if the label has ever been assigned, either by loading one from the database, or by assigning one at runtime.
* `CAddressBookData::IsChange` and `CWallet::FindAddressBookEntry` are new methods to assist in excluding change from code that doesn't expect to see them.
* For safety in merging, `CAddressBookData::name` has been made read-only (the actual data is stored in `m_label`, a new private member, and can be changed only with `setLabel` which updates the `m_change` flag), and `mapAddressBook` has been renamed to `m_address_book` (to force old code to be rebased to compile).
A final commit also does some minor optimisation, avoiding redundant lookups in `m_address_book` when we already have a pointer to the `CAddressBookData`.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK b5795a7886. Pretty clever and nicely implemented fix!
jonatack:
ACK b5795a7886 nice improvements -- code review, built/ran tests rebased on current master ff53433fe4 and tested manually with rpc/cli
jnewbery:
Good fix. utACK b5795a788.
Tree-SHA512: 40525185a0bcc1723f602243c269499ec86ecb298fecb5ef24d626bbdd5e3efece86cdb1084ad7eebf7eeaf251db4a6e056bcd25bc8457b417fcbb53d032ebf0
7b8e15728d rpc: Fix rpcRunLater race in walletpassphrase (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Release locks before calling `rpcRunLater`.
Quick explanation: `rpcRunLater` leads to `event_free` which calls `event_del` which can wait for the event callback to finish if it's already running and that callback will try to lock wallet mutex - which is already locked in http thread.
Fixes#14995 , fixes#18482. Best reviewed with whitespace changes hidden.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 7b8e15728d, only tested that this avoids the node freezing. Did not look at how libevent works or how the deadlock happens or if this breaks other stuff. 📞
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 7b8e15728d. Just updated comment since last review
Tree-SHA512: 17874a2fa7b0e164fb0d7ee4cb7d59650275b8c03476fb291d60af8b758495457660d3912623fb26259fefe84aeba21c0a9e0c6467982ba511f19344ed5413ab
cd3b1569d9 Correctly compute redeemScript from witnessScript for signrawtransaction (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`ParsePrevouts` uses `GetScriptForWitness` on the given witnessScript to find the corresponding redeemScript. This is incorrect when the witnessScript is either a P2PK or P2PKH script as it returns the corresponding P2WPK script instead of turning the witnessScript into a P2WSH script. Instead this should make the script a `WitnessV0ScriptHash` destination and get the script for that.
Test cases are also added. These will fail on master with a `redeemScript does not correspond to witnessScript`
Reported on [Bitcointalk](https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5236818.0)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
weak ACK cd3b1569d9, only checked that the test fails without the code change 🚰
instagibbs:
utACK cd3b1569d9
Tree-SHA512: afac671dbb52ce88bfb4a9ca3dd6065427ad52c9778d0549ad40e9286778f308adad24fb3b3c3089545d7f88c57c53d41224fd7a4bb207550eff2fe06600118f
d6815a2313 refactor: drop boost::signals2 in validationinterface (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Stop using boost::signals2 internally in validationinterface. Replace with std::list and Add/Remove/Clear/Iterate helper functions.
Motivation for change is to reduce dependencies and avoid issues happening with boost versions before 1.59: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18517, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18471
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK d6815a2313
laanwj:
ACK d6815a2313
hebasto:
re-ACK d6815a2313
promag:
ACK d6815a2313.
Tree-SHA512: 4fc0f14a8446e8616cc142af6c3d36815f3254525d30348ba8e4d4bc74c249a5a8c9bc119bdd1be7ebd7abe0b784bc0c5551a3e156a766890cb2fdd891a95919
0eeb0468e7 net: Hardcoded seeds update for 0.20 (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Update hardcoded seeds from http://bitcoin.sipa.be/seeds.txt.gz,
according to release process.
Output from makeseeds.py:
```
IPv4 IPv6 Onion Pass
1364173 244127 2454 Initial
1364173 244127 2454 Skip entries with invalid address
1129552 213117 2345 After removing duplicates
1129548 213117 2345 Skip entries from suspicious hosts
338216 191944 2249 Enforce minimal number of blocks
336851 188993 2189 Require service bit 1
6998 1520 150 Require minimum uptime
5682 1290 89 Require a known and recent user agent
5622 1279 89 Filter out hosts with multiple bitcoin ports
512 146 89 Look up ASNs and limit results per ASN and per net
```
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: ce1c2cda18dd5bd22586a5283a0877f3bd890437cc29dc1d85452ba4a4d28032f591c8b37f3329e8e649556cf83750b6949a068fad76d1773853d93014609da0
9e071b0089 test: remove rapidcheck integration and tests (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Whilst the property tests are interesting, ultimately [rapidcheck](https://github.com/emil-e/rapidcheck) integration in this repository has not gained much traction. We have a limited number of tests, and they are rarely (if ever) run. Have discussed this with Chris Stewart.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 9e071b0089
Tree-SHA512: d0c12af3163382eee8413da420c63e39265a7b700709a05d518445832d45e049aed9508e32524db5228fe3ac114609a00b7bb890be047c07032e44a5ef4611e9
autotools and automake changes to support multiprocess execution.
This adds a new --enable-multiprocess flag, and build configuration code to
detect libraries needed for multiprocess support. The --enable-multiprocess
flag builds new bitcoin-node and bitcoin-gui executables, which are updated in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10102 to communicate across processes.
But for now they are functionally equivalent to existing bitcoind and
bitcoin-qt executables.
fab32557f2 rpc: Make rpc documentation not depend on rpc args (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is required to host the documentation on a static resource (like a website or pdf)
ACKs for top commit:
emilengler:
utACK fab32557f2
promag:
ACK fab32557f2.
Tree-SHA512: 3ca2691c7fbd5f17c75df2887753da152f66521dcb7dee4c29af6339fdea011cecdd51f825b96bde9c6aaf82f4d915cbd5aacb52e4eae3898d9dbc216f627171
f32ab443a9 Bugfix: RPC: JSON null is not "None" (Luke Dashjr)
26dcf39581 Bugfix: RPC: Don't use a continuation elipsis after an elision elipsis (Luke Dashjr)
eca65caadc Bugfix: RPC: Add missing commas and correct indentation of explicit ELISION (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
1. listsinceblock had a double ellipsis (elision + continuation); this looks ugly, just one is needed.
2. Elision ellipsis wasn't getting a comma, so was truncated to `".."` by comma-removal code.
3. Elision ellipsis was indented incorrectly (as if it was a subitem).
4. Similarly, type "none" would get truncated to `"Non"`, when it should really be `"null"` anyway.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK f32ab443a9🐰
Tree-SHA512: 34e1c72673790ed11cdee838d64ea5e0ac498de19258df99d54b5322e003060123c65ad27ac2fd4729a1dfe52066a0629602a132b1ef85d4154affd99a065a3f
Update hardcoded seeds from seeds_emzy.txt seeds_lukejr.txt
seeds_sipa.txt seeds_sjors.txt, according to release process.
Output from makeseeds.py:
```
IPv4 IPv6 Onion Pass
1364173 244127 2454 Initial
1364173 244127 2454 Skip entries with invalid address
1129552 213117 2345 After removing duplicates
1129548 213117 2345 Skip entries from suspicious hosts
338216 191944 2249 Enforce minimal number of blocks
336851 188993 2189 Require service bit 1
6998 1520 150 Require minimum uptime
5682 1290 89 Require a known and recent user agent
5622 1279 89 Filter out hosts with multiple bitcoin ports
512 146 89 Look up ASNs and limit results per ASN and per net
```
fad2f68353 init: Replace URL_WEBSITE with PACKAGE_URL (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is needed for rebranding efforts such as #18489
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fad2f68353, tested on Linux Mint 19.3:
fanquake:
ACK fad2f68353 - clicked a link.
Tree-SHA512: c26e18cd328d3dd3fd7e25413e1bab780026687a148f126b8673e5f6cc13249f6c16689e45eba9da1545915c6001f96cd33f4e656c08cda3eae1c3fd88da23ea
f65c9ad40f Check for overflow when calculating sum of outputs (Elichai Turkel)
Pull request description:
This was reported by practicalswift here #18046
The exact order of the if, is important, we first do `!MoneyRange(tx_out.nValue)` to make sure the amount is non-negative. and then `std::numeric_limits<CAmount>::max() - tx_out.nValue < nValueOut` checks that the addition cannot overflow (if we won't check that the amount is positive this check can also overflow! (by doing something like `max - -max`))
and only then we make sure that the some is also valid `!MoneyRange(nValueOut + tx_out.nValue)`
if any of these conditions fail we throw.
the overflowing logic:
```
a + b > max // we want to fail if a+b is more than the maximum -> will overflow
b > max - a
max - a < b
```
Closes: #18046
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK f65c9ad40f, checked that clang with O2 produces identical binaries 💕
practicalswift:
ACK f65c9ad40f
instagibbs:
utACK f65c9ad40f
vasild:
ACK f65c9ad40f modulo `s/assert.h/cassert/`
Tree-SHA512: 512d6cf4762f24c41cf9a38da486b17b19c634fa3f4efbdebfe6608779e96fc3014d5d2d29adb8001e113152c0217bbd5b3900ac4edc7b8abe77f82f36209e33
Previous versions assumed absence of an entry in mapAddressBook indicated change.
This no longer holds true (due to bugs) and will shortly be made intentional.
Renaming the field helps ensure that old code using mapAddressBook directly gets checked for necessary rebasing.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i -e 's/mapAddressBook/m_address_book/g' $(git grep -l 'mapAddressBook' ./src)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
