Currently it is an alias to the global ::mempool and should be used as
follows.
* Node code (validation and transaction relay) can use either ::mempool
or node.mempool, whichever seems a better fit.
* RPC code should use the added convenience getter EnsureMempool, which
makes sure the mempool exists before use. This prepares the RPC code
to a future where the mempool might be disabled at runtime or compile
time.
* Test code should use m_node.mempool directly, as the mempool is always
initialized for tests.
edb6b768a4 fix uninitialized variable nMinerConfirmationWindow (NullFunctor)
Pull request description:
It is used for the computation of `BIP9WarningHeight`, and by that time it isn't initialized.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK edb6b768a
promag:
ACK edb6b768a4, commit description could be cleaned up though.
MarcoFalke:
ACK edb6b768a4, used python3 to do the addition locally 📍
practicalswift:
ACK edb6b768a4, used `clang++ -O2` on the previous version^W^W^W^W^W^W`bc` to verify the addition locally 🏓
Sjors:
Code review ACK edb6b76. Nit: commit description has duplicate text.
Tree-SHA512: 6fa0be0ecfbfd5d537f2c5b4a9333c76530c1f3182f777330cc7939b0496e37b75d8f8810cdaf471a9bd3247b425f2e239578300dfa0d5a87cd14a6ccfafa619
Also rename the "result_complete" variable in GetSettingsList() to "done" to be
more consistent with GetSetting().
This change doesn't affect current behavior but could be useful in the future
to support dynamically changing settings at runtime and adding new settings
sources, because it lets high priority sources reset settings back to default
(see test).
By removing a special case for null, this change also helps merge code treat
settings values more like black boxes, and interfere less with settings parsing
and retrieval.
333362991c doc: Explain $LIB in LD_PRELOAD in gitian descriptors (MarcoFalke)
fab9850ef4 scripted-diff: Avoid hardcoded libfaketime dir in gitian (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Without this gitian prints warnings for me:
```
ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/faketime/libfaketime.so.1' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded (cannot open shared object file): ignored.
```
```
$ ls /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/faketime/libfaketime.so.1
/usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/faketime/libfaketime.so.1
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 333362991c
Tree-SHA512: 3e7c4471b69c2ae38c29d0cc0db8b9eae0912085299d7f5ac67eeb4b6a2fdc7eb23d806eeeae0b0c2da22d6d1ba82513cab23652876b97aada9928b2c7d38e7e
The bool/int/string flags were added speculatively in #16097 and trigger errors
when type checking is actually implemented in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16545
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/ALLOW_\(BOOL\|INT\|STRING\)/ALLOW_ANY/g' src/test/util_tests.cpp src/test/getarg_tests.cpp
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
This commit does not change behavior.
Test GetSetting and GetArg type coercion, negation, and default value handling.
Test is expanded later to cover other flags besides ALLOW_ANY when they are
implemented in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16545
This commit does not change behavior.
Add for consistency with ArgsManager::GetSetting method and to make setting
types accessible to ArgsManager callers and tests (test added next commit).
This commit does not change behavior.
* Instead of calling RandAddSeedSleep anytime the scheduler goes
idle, call its replacement (RandAddSeedPeriodic) just once per
minute. This has better guarantees of actually being run, and
helps limit how frequently the dynamic env data is gathered.
* Since this code runs once per minute regardless now, we no
longer need to keep track of the last time strengthening was
run; just do it always.
* Make strengthening time context dependent (100 ms at startup,
10 ms once per minute afterwards).
49997813a4 test: check custom ancestor limit in mempool_packages.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The functional test `mempool_packages.py` starts one node with default ancestor/descendant limit settings and one with a custom, reduced ancestor limit (currently `-limitancestorcount=5`). The effect of the latter had not been tested yet though. This is approached in this PR by checking on the expected mempool contents of node1 after the node0 ancestor tests are done, via the following three conditions:
- the # of txs in the node1 mempool is equal to the the limit
- all txs in node1 mempool are a subset of txs in node0 mempool
- the node1 mempool txs match the start of the constructed tx-chain
Note that this still doesn't *fully* check the expected mempool of node1 (e.g. that it isn't influenced by `prioritisetransaction` RPC on node0), hence I add another TODO. In the future it would make sense to also set a custom descendant limit when the second TODO about checking node1's mempool is approached: 89e93135ae/test/functional/mempool_packages.py (L228)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 49997813a4👲
Tree-SHA512: d3a1d19fb49731238ad08ee7c02e2fa81a227e3b4ef3340d68598de42ddb62be9161134f6b8e08fa76b8c9faa02fecfa01111159642e20e9f358292a757b7608
To test the custom ancestor limit on node1 (passed by the argument
-limitancestorcount), we check for three conditions:
-> the # of txs in the node1 mempool is equal to the the limit
-> all txs in node1 mempool are a subset of txs in node0 mempool
-> the node1 mempool txs match the start of the constructed tx-chain
eb880f092b fix Typo: "merkelRoot" -> "merkleRoot" (ianliu)
Pull request description:
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
-->
<!--
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves
Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see `src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new tests
should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the bug
was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should first
consider building the system outside of Bitcoin Core, if possible.
* Refactoring changes are only accepted if they are required for a feature or
bug fix or otherwise improve developer experience significantly. For example,
most "code style" refactoring changes require a thorough explanation why they
are useful, what downsides they have and why they *significantly* improve
developer experience or avoid serious programming bugs. Note that code style
is often a subjective matter. Unless they are explicitly mentioned to be
preferred in the [developer notes](/doc/developer-notes.md), stylistic code
changes are usually rejected.
-->
<!--
Bitcoin Core has a thorough review process and even the most trivial change
needs to pass a lot of eyes and requires non-zero or even substantial time
effort to review. There is a huge lack of active reviewers on the project, so
patches often sit for a long time.
-->
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK eb880f092b but please change from `merkleRootofHashes` to `merkleRootOfHashes`
Tree-SHA512: ada9edceee19da5678bf35e1258163e7102fe176dc5cf40acaa1468fa8b2801494f8bf65d5359dcd0054fbc22f07fdc98d6208cfdb54dd9171fd45c89d71e098
