20ff4991e5 rpc: Capture potentially large UniValue by ref for rpcdoccheck (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
Capturing it by reference instead of value should save us from making a copy of a potentially large object. Saw this while having a look at #25229 although I couldn't reproduce an actual leak, so this is not a fix for that issue.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 20ff4991e5
theStack:
Code-review ACK 20ff4991e5
furszy:
Code ACK 20ff4991
Tree-SHA512: faf7bb14e37f8324b93a39095b07693626329da47c4a1ac8929bf99385e2e0567008e959e7e8540bc7d454d08fa41cccd39f55253c9a839fa88362922058a93b
4185570340 Add RPC to get mempool txs spending outputs (t-bast)
Pull request description:
We add an RPC to fetch mempool transactions spending any of the given outpoints.
Without this RPC, application developers need to first call `getrawmempool` which returns a long list of `txid`, then fetch each of these transactions individually (`getrawtransaction`) to check whether they spend the given outpoints, which wastes a lot of bandwidth (in the worst case we need to transfer the whole mempool).
For example in lightning, when we discover that one of our channel funding transactions has been spent, we need to find the spending transaction to claim our outputs from it. We are currently forced to fetch the whole mempool to do the analysis ourselves, which is quite costly.
I believe that this RPC is also generally useful when doing some introspection on your mempool after one of your transactions failed to broadcast, for example when you implement RBF at the application level. Fetching and analyzing the conflicting transaction gives you more information to successfully replace it.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
re-utACK 4185570340
vincenzopalazzo:
re-ACK 4185570340
danielabrozzoni:
re-tACK 4185570340
w0xlt:
reACK 4185570340
Tree-SHA512: 206687efb720308b7e0b6cf16dd0a994006c0b5a290c8eb386917a80130973a6356d0d5cae1c63a01bb29e066dd721594969db106cba7249214fcac90d2c3dbc
rpc/blockchain.cpp is now the only user of the vestigial
GetUTXOStats(...). And since GetUTXOStats(...)'s special fallback logic
was only really relevant/meant for rpc/blockchain.cpp, we can just move
it there.
In previous commits in this patchset, we removed all in-param members of
CCoinsStats. Now that that's done, we can modify GetUTXOStats to return
an optional CCoinsStats instead of a status bool. Callers are modified
accordingly.
In rpc/blockchain.cpp, we discover that GetUTXOStats' status bool when
getting UTXO stats for pprev was not checked for error. We fix this as
well.
Currently, CCoinsStats is a struct with both in-params and out-params
where the hash_type and index_requested members are the only in-params.
This change removes CCoinsStats' hash_type in-param member and adds it
to the relevant functions instead.
[META] In subsequent commits, all of CCoinsStats' members which serve as
in-params will be moved out so as to make CCoinsStats a pure
out-param struct.
This decouples validation.cpp from netaddress.cpp (transitively,
timedata.cpp, and asmap.cpp).
This is important for libbitcoinkernel as:
- There is no reason for the consensus engine to be coupled with
netaddress, timedata, and asmap
- Users of libbitcoinkernel can now easily supply their own
std::function that provides the adjusted time.
See the src/Makefile.am changes for some satisfying removals.
fa1b76aeb0 Do not call global Params() when chainman is in scope (MacroFake)
fa30234be8 Do not pass CChainParams& to PeerManager::make (MacroFake)
fafe5c0ca2 Do not pass CChainParams& to BlockAssembler constructor (MacroFake)
faf012b438 Do not pass Consensus::Params& to Chainstate helpers (MacroFake)
fa4ee53dca Do not pass time getter to Chainstate helpers (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
It seems confusing to pass chain params, consensus params, or a time function around when it is not needed.
Fix this by:
* Inlining the passed time getter function. I don't see a use case why this should be mockable.
* Using `chainman.GetConsensus()` or `chainman.GetParams()`, where possible.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK fa1b76aeb0.
vincenzopalazzo:
ACK fa1b76aeb0
Tree-SHA512: 1abff5cba4b4871d97f17dbcdf67bc9255ff21fa4150a79a74e39b28f0610eab3e7dee24d56872dd6e111f003b55e288958cdd467e6218368d896f191e4ec9cd
fafae678f6 build: Enable RPC_DOC_CHECK on --enable-debug (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
This probably makes no large difference, as the setting is already enabled by default in the functional tests. However, I think it is nice to also enable it in debug builds by default to catch issues while manually testing without the runtime flags specified.
See also https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24709
ACKs for top commit:
vincenzopalazzo:
utACK fafae678f6
Tree-SHA512: cea3276fc9b5a3bc0f6d9819be9a50b19ecf762729d3e3975abdf00da06beaa3f664b18a826fbab1fedd9143bc0624a95a490bfe40c4b5b0a0f94dbc565ce738
fa9af21878 scripted-diff: Use getInt<T> over get_int/get_int64 (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Seems better to see the return type directly and be able to modify it easier, as the return type is used for exceptions (in-range checking and parsing feedback).
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa9af21878
Tree-SHA512: 284aa2527d0f663ca01550115025c9c64c787531d595f866c718f6ad09b9b0cac1e683a7d77f8009b75de990fd37166b44063ffa83fba8a04e9a31600b4c2725
ada8358ef5 Sanitize port in `addpeeraddress()` (amadeuszpawlik)
Pull request description:
In connection to #22087, it has been [pointed out](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22087#pullrequestreview-674786285) that `addpeeraddress` needs to get its port-value sanitized.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK ada8358ef5
Tree-SHA512: 48771cd4f6940aa7840fa23488565c09dea86bd5ec5a5a1fc0374afb4857aebcd2a1f51e2d4cb7348460e0ad9793dc5d2962df457084ed2b8d8142cae650003f
a01b92ad86 doc: add release notes about removal of the `deprecatedrpc=softforks` flag (Sebastian Falbesoner)
8c5533c7a9 rpc: remove deprecated "softforks" field from getblockchaininfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Information on soft fork status has been moved from the `getblockchaininfo` RPC to the `getdeploymentinfo` RPC in #23508. The "softfork" result in `getblockchaininfo` was still available for 23.0 with the `-deprecatedrpc=softforks` configuration option, but this can be fully removed now for the next release (24.0).
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
ACK a01b92ad86
ajtowns:
ACK a01b92ad86
Tree-SHA512: 692d9d02fdf0b3c18376644a85b24b57efebf612738084c01ef47d47e41861e773688613a808e81f10ab6eec340de00eef96987a1e34d612aaf7f0a0b134d89e
06822f8654 Bugfix: RPC/blockchain: Correct description of getblockchaininfo's pruneheight result (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
It is possible that lower blocks are complete due to being stored in the same file as blocks not yet eligible for pruning.
Not really satisfied with this new description, so suggestions for better phasing welcome :)
(Split out of #24629)
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code-review ACK 06822f8654
Tree-SHA512: 755a5a40d065ad77f4ac2c19c0b3502eceb3162034823ee7ce1668100d97e8a2bfb822ac381feb7afd13e653cd08a81d5fa505575531757457d6d22c909a6510
bb5c24b120 validation: move g_versionbitscache into ChainstateManager (Anthony Towns)
eca22c726a test/versionbits: make versionbitscache a parameter (Anthony Towns)
d603f1d8a7 deploymentstatus: make versionbitscache a parameter (Anthony Towns)
78adef1753 refactor: use chainman instead of chainParams for DeploymentActive* (Anthony Towns)
deffe0df6c deploymentstatus: allow chainman in place of consensusParams (Anthony Towns)
eaa2e3f25c validation: move UpdateUncommittedBlockStructures and GenerateCoinbaseCommitment into ChainstateManager (Anthony Towns)
5c67e84d37 validation: replace ::Params() calls with chainstate/chainman member (Anthony Towns)
38860f93b6 validation: remove redundant CChainParams params from ChainstateManager methods (Anthony Towns)
69675ea4e7 validation: add CChainParams to ChainstateManager (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Gives `ChainstateManager` a reference to the `CChainParams` its working on, and simplifies some of the functions that would otherwise take that as a parameter. Removes the `g_versionbitscache` global by moving it into `ChainstateManager`.
ACKs for top commit:
dongcarl:
reACK bb5c24b120
MarcoFalke:
review ACK bb5c24b120📙
Tree-SHA512: 3fa74905e5df561e3e74bb0b8fce6085c5311e6633e7d74c0fb0c82a907f5bbb1fd4ebc5d11d4f0b1c019bb51eabb9f6e4bcc4652a696d36a5878c807b85f121
This change improves the usability of the `dumptxoutset` RPC in two ways,
in the case that an invalid path is passed:
1. return from the RPC immediately, rather then when the file is first
tried to be written (which is _after_ calculating the UTXO set hash)
2. return a proper return code and error message instead of the cryptic
"CAutoFile::operator<<: file handle is nullptr: unspecified
iostream_category error" (-1)
308dd2e93e Sanity assert GetAncestor() != nullptr where appropriate (Adam Jonas)
Pull request description:
Re-opening #17232. I have rebased the PR and addressed jonatack's nit suggestions.
Add sanity asserts for return value of `CBlockIndex::GetAncestor()` where appropriate.
In validation.cpp `CheckSequenceLocks`, check the return value of `tip->GetAncestor(maxInputHeight)` stored into `lp->maxInputBlock`. If it ever returns `nullptr` because the ancestor isn't found, it's going to be a bad bug to keep going, since a `LockPoints` object with the `maxInputBlock` member set to `nullptr` signifies no relative lock time.
In the other places, the added asserts would prevent accidental dereferencing of a null pointer which is undefined behavior.
Co-Authored-By: Adam Jonas <jonas@chaincode.com>
Co-Authored-By: danra <danra@users.noreply.github.com>
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 308dd2e93e
Tree-SHA512: 5bfdaab1499607ae2c3cd3e2e9e8c37850bfd0e327e680f4e36c81f9c6d98a543af78ecfac1ab0e06325d264412615a04d52005875780c7db2a4d81bd2d2259a
fac6cfc50f refactor: Change * to & in MutableTransactionSignatureCreator (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `MutableTransactionSignatureCreator` constructor takes in a pointer to a mutable transaction. This is problematic for several reasons:
* It would be undefined behaviour to pass in a nullptr because for signature creation, the memory of the mutable transaction is accessed
* No caller currently passes in a nullptr, so passing a reference as a pointer is confusing
Fix all issues by replacing `*` with `&` in `MutableTransactionSignatureCreator`
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code-review ACK fac6cfc50f
jonatack:
ACK fac6cfc50f
Tree-SHA512: d84296b030bd4fa2709e5adbfe43a5f8377d218957d844af69a819893252af671df7f00004f5ba601a0bd70f3c1c2e58c4f00e75684da663f28432bb5c89fb86
Add sanity asserts for return value of `CBlockIndex::GetAncestor()` where appropriate.
In validation.cpp `CheckSequenceLocks`, check the return value of `tip->GetAncestor(maxInputHeight)` stored into `lp->maxInputBlock`. If it ever returns `nullptr` because the ancestor isn't found, it's going to be a bad bug to keep going, since a `LockPoints` object with the `maxInputBlock` member set to `nullptr` signifies no relative lock time.
In the other places, the added asserts would prevent accidental dereferencing of a null pointer which is undefined behavior.
Co-Authored-By: Aurèle Oulès <aurele@oules.com>
Co-Authored-By: danra <danra@users.noreply.github.com>
We add an RPC to fetch the mempool transactions spending given outpoints.
Without this RPC, application developers would need to first call
`getrawmempool` which returns a long list of `txid`, then fetch each of
these txs individually to check whether they spend the given outpoint(s).
This RPC can later be enriched to also find confirmed transactions instead
of being restricted to mempool transactions.
e71c51b27d refactor: rename command -> message type in comments in the src/net* files (Shashwat)
2b09593bdd scripted-diff: Rename message command to message type (Shashwat)
Pull request description:
This PR is a follow-up to #24078.
> a message is not a command, but simply a message of some type
The first commit covers the message_command variable name and comments not addressed in the original PR in `src/net*` files.
The second commit goes beyond the original `src/net*` limit of #24078 and does similar changes in the `src/rpc/net.cpp` file.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK e71c51b27d💥
Tree-SHA512: 24015d132c00f15239e5d3dc7aedae904ae3103a90920bb09e984ff57723402763f697d886322f78e42a0cb46808cb6bc9d4905561dc6ddee9961168f8324b05
e2b954e87f rpc: use GetBlockTime() for getblockchaininfo#time (Jon Atack)
86ce844d3b blockstorage, refactor: pass GetFirstStoredBlock() start_block by reference (Jon Atack)
ed12c0a49d blockstorage, refactor: make GetFirstStoredBlock() a member of BlockManager (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Picks up the remaining review feedback in #21726 and #24956.
- make the global function `GetFirstStoredBlock()` a member of the `BlockManager` class
- pass the `start_block` param of `GetFirstStoredBlock()` by reference instead of a pointer
- use `GetBlockTime()` for RPC getblockchaininfo#time
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK e2b954e87f
Tree-SHA512: 546e3c2e18245996b5b286829a605ae919eff3510963ec71b7c9ede521b1f501697e5b2f9d35d7a0606a74cbc8907201c58acf1e2cf7daaa86eefe2e3a8e296b
fa60169811 rpc: Move signmessage RPC util to new file (MacroFake)
fa9425177e Remove cs_main from verifymessage (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
The `verifymessage` RPC has several issues:
* It takes `cs_main` for no reason, blocking progress on removing the `cs_main` global mutex.
* It is located in a file called `misc`, which is not a very helpful name.
Fix all issues.
ACKs for top commit:
vincenzopalazzo:
ACK fa60169811
Tree-SHA512: c71a1f481b828e0a544405fecbbc7ca44e66ea46b498d7aed1f1c584d6a99724deb13e89d90b9d5cdeecbce293e6a41e9f7ae299543f6d761bf9e7a839b6c7f3
