6bdff429ec build: Include `config/bitcoin-config.h` explicitly in `util/trace.h` (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The `ENABLE_TRACING` macro is expected to be defined in the `config/bitcoin-config.h` header.
Therefore, the current code is error-prone as it depends on whether the `config/bitcoin-config.h` header was included before or not.
This bug was noticed while working on CMake [stuff](https://github.com/hebasto/bitcoin/pull/37).
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 6bdff429ec
Tree-SHA512: 22c4fdeb51628814050eb99a83db4268a4f3106207eeef918a07214bbc52f2b22490f6b05fcb96216f147afa4197c51102503738131e2583e750b6d195747a49
fac36b94ef refactor: Remove CBlockFileInfo::SetNull (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Seems better to use C++11 member initializers and then let the compiler figure out how to construct objects of this class.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
ACK fac36b94ef
pablomartin4btc:
ACK fac36b94ef
theStack:
LGTM ACK fac36b94ef
Tree-SHA512: aee741c8f668f0e5b658fc83f4ebd196b43fead3dd437afdb0a2dafe092ae3d559332b3d9d61985c92e1a59982d8f24942606e6a98598c6ef7ff43697e858725
fa21535551 fuzz: Increase merge -rss_limit_mb (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
For some reason, the limit is hit. (Presumably due to `-set_cover_merge=1` eating more memory, or by simply having more fuzz inputs).
Fix it by increasing it for the merge operation.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
ACK fa21535551
hebasto:
ACK fa21535551, considering the discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets/pull/155.
Tree-SHA512: 4fed0f254eccc6fe0b53656bc345ff898b13811dc39387387317d34b521ab77cee03d82b0896dd92d253b7546b6a7e4bdcd478749f47064374ab44ad759ab9ff
The legacy serialization was vulnerable to maleation and is fixed by
adopting the same serialization procedure as was already in use for
MuHash.
This also includes necessary test fixes where the hash_serialized2 was
hardcoded as well as correction of the regtest chainparams.
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Falbesoner <sebastian.falbesoner@gmail.com>
d3223685b1 test: De-dublicate/optimize assumeutxo test for further extensions (Fabian Jahr)
0a576d62fe test: check au file with changed outpoint index (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Also doing some de-duplications. I kept the second commit separate for now as I am not 100% if this is overdoing it and makes it harder to reason about. But it also makes it easier to add more cases where we change more data.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK d3223685b1
achow101:
ACK d3223685b1
Tree-SHA512: be950a34b0ed50cb58459df47cff6513df19d834bf81815572cd26b10dee26e6f80866f0c44023cf246aafbbd256e62d23ce903e8b07fdff2297bc7065799bb8
dd4dcbd4cd [fuzz] Delete i2p target (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
closes#28665
The target is buggy and doesn't reach basic coverage.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK dd4dcbd4cd
glozow:
ACK dd4dcbd4cd, agree it's better to delete this test until somebody wants to write a better one
Tree-SHA512: b6ca6cad1773b1ceb6e5ac0fd501ea615f66507ef811745799deaaa4460f1700d96ae03cf55b740a96ed8cd2283b3d6738cd580ba97f2af619197d6c4414ca21
Also add test to make sure this doesn't get broken in the future.
This was breaking vector<bool> serialization in multiprocess code because
template current deduction guides would make it appear like vector<bool> could
be converted to a span, but then the actual conversion to span would fail.
Coin serialize method segfaults if IsSpent condition is true. This caused
multiprocess code to segfault when serializing the Coin& output argument to of
the Node::getUnspentOutput method if the coin was not found. Segfault could be
triggered by double clicking and viewing transaction details in the GUI
transaction list.
Fix this by replacing Coin& output argument with optional<Coin> return value to
avoid trying to serializing spent coins.
The `ENABLE_TRACING` macro is expected to be defined in the
`config/bitcoin-config.h` header.
Therefore, the current code is error-prone as it depends on whether the
`config/bitcoin-config.h` header was included before or not.
ec84f999f1 log: Don't log cache rebalancing in absense of a snapshot chainstate (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
I have noticed that this log now is always printed, even if there is no snapshot chainstate present or even was present. I think this is confusing to users that have never even thought about using assumeutxo since in that case the rebalancing is just ensuring the normal environment with one chainstate. So I suggest we don't log in absence of a snapshot chainstate. We could also think about rewording the message instead but I think this is simpler.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
utACK ec84f999f1
glozow:
concept ACK ec84f999f1, don't have opinions other than removing confusing log
theStack:
utACK ec84f999f1
Tree-SHA512: 30bbfc648e7c788106f78d52e47a3aa1e1874f65d13743643dc50bcf7f450d8330711ff9fdeac361722542da6051533153829c6d49033227ed315e111afc899f
When migrating, create the watchonly and solvables wallets without a
context. Then unload and reload them after migration completes, as we do
for the actual wallet.
There is also additional handling for a failed reload.
5c8e15c451 i2p: destroy the session if we get an unexpected error from the I2P router (Vasil Dimov)
762404a68c i2p: also sleep after errors in Accept() (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
### Background
In the `i2p::sam::Session` class:
`Listen()` does:
* if the session is not created yet
* create the control socket and on it:
* `HELLO`
* `SESSION CREATE ID=sessid`
* leave the control socked opened
* create a new socket and on it:
* `HELLO`
* `STREAM ACCEPT ID=sessid`
* read reply (`STREAM STATUS`), `Listen()` only succeeds if it contains `RESULT=OK`
Then a wait starts, for a peer to connect. When connected,
`Accept()` does:
* on the socket from `STREAM ACCEPT` from `Listen()`: read the Base64 identification of the connecting peer
### Problem
The I2P router may be in such a state that this happens in a quick succession (many times per second, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22759#issuecomment-1609907115): `Listen()`-succeeds, `Accept()`-fails.
`Accept()` fails because the I2P router sends something that is not Base64 on the socket: `STREAM STATUS RESULT=I2P_ERROR MESSAGE="Session was closed"`
We only sleep after failed `Listen()` because the assumption was that if `Accept()` fails then the next `Listen()` will also fail.
### Solution
Avoid filling the log with "Error accepting:" messages and sleep also after a failed `Accept()`.
### Extra changes
* Reset the error waiting time after one successful connection. Otherwise the timer will remain high due to problems that have been solved long time in the past.
* Increment the wait time less aggressively.
* Handle the unexpected "Session was closed" message more gracefully (don't log stupid messages like `Cannot decode Base64: "STREAM STATUS...`) and destroy the session right way.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 5c8e15c451
jonatack:
re-ACK 5c8e15c451
Tree-SHA512: 1d47958c50eeae9eefcb668b8539fd092adead93328e4bf3355267819304b99ab41cbe1b5dbedbc3452c2bc389dc8330c0e27eb5ccb880e33dc46930a1592885
0e6f6ebc06 net: remove unused CConnman::FindNode(const CSubNet&) (Vasil Dimov)
9482cb780f netbase: possibly change the result of LookupSubNet() to CJDNS (Vasil Dimov)
53afa68026 net: move MaybeFlipIPv6toCJDNS() from net to netbase (Vasil Dimov)
6e308651c4 net: move IsReachable() code to netbase and encapsulate it (Vasil Dimov)
c42ded3d9b fuzz: ConsumeNetAddr(): avoid IPv6 addresses that look like CJDNS (Vasil Dimov)
64d6f77907 net: put CJDNS prefix byte in a constant (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
`LookupSubNet()` would treat addresses that start with `fc` as IPv6 even if `-cjdnsreachable` is set. This creates the following problems where it is called:
* `NetWhitelistPermissions::TryParse()`: otherwise `-whitelist=` fails to white list CJDNS addresses: when a CJDNS peer connects to us, it will be matched against IPv6 `fc...` subnet and the match will never succeed.
* `BanMapFromJson()`: CJDNS bans are stored as just IPv6 addresses in `banlist.json`. Upon reading from disk they have to be converted back to CJDNS, otherwise, after restart, a ban entry like (`fc00::1`, IPv6) would not match a peer (`fc00::1`, CJDNS).
* `RPCConsole::unbanSelectedNode()`: in the GUI the ban entries go through `CSubNet::ToString()` and back via `LookupSubNet()`. Then it must match whatever is stored in `BanMan`, otherwise it is impossible to unban via the GUI.
These were uncovered by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26859.
Thus, flip the result of `LookupSubNet()` to CJDNS if the network base address starts with `fc` and `-cjdnsreachable` is set. Since subnetting/masking does not make sense for CJDNS (the address is "random" bytes, like Tor and I2P, there is no hierarchy) treat `fc.../mask` as an invalid `CSubNet`.
To achieve that, `MaybeFlipIPv6toCJDNS()` has to be moved from `net` to `netbase` and thus also `IsReachable()`. In the process of moving `IsReachable()`, `SetReachable()` and `vfLimited[]` encapsulate those in a class.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Code review ACK 0e6f6ebc06
achow101:
ACK 0e6f6ebc06
mzumsande:
re-ACK 0e6f6ebc06
Tree-SHA512: 4767a60dc882916de4c8b110ce8de208ff3f58daaa0b560e6547d72e604d07c4157e72cf98b237228310fc05c0a3922f446674492e2ba02e990a272d288bd566
With `queuedTx` owning the `CTransactionRef` shared ptrs, they (and
the managed objects) are entirely allocated on the heap. In
`DisconnectedBlockTransactions::DynamicMemoryUsage`, we account for
the 2 pointers that make up the shared_ptr, but not for the managed
object (CTransaction) or the control block.
Prior to this commit, by calculating the `RecursiveDynamicUsage` on
a `CTransaction` whenever modifying `cachedInnerUsage`, we account
for the dynamic usage of the `CTransaction`, i.e. the `vins` and
`vouts` vectors, but we do not account for the `CTransaction`
object itself, nor for the `CTransactionRef` control block.
This means prior to this commit, `DynamicMemoryUsage` underestimates
dynamic memory usage by not including the `CTransaction` objects and
the shared ptr control blocks.
Fix this by calculating `RecursiveDynamicUsage` on the
`CTransactionRef` instead of the `CTransaction` whenever modifying
`cachedInnerUsage`.
b59b31ae0b build: Drop redundant qt/bitcoin.cpp (Hennadii Stepanov)
d90ad5a42e build: Include qt sources for parsing with extract_strings.py (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On master (4fc15d1566) some strings are still untranslated.
This PR fixes this issue.
To verify:
1) `./autogen.sh && ./configure && make -C src translate` _before_ applying this change
2) apply this change
3) `./autogen.sh && ./configure && make -C src translate` _after_ applying this change
The result of `git diff src/qt/bitcoinstrings.cpp`:
```diff
--- a/src/qt/bitcoinstrings.cpp
+++ b/src/qt/bitcoinstrings.cpp
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP("bitcoin-core", ""
"You need to rebuild the database using -reindex to go back to unpruned "
"mode. This will redownload the entire blockchain"),
QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP("bitcoin-core", "%s is set very high!"),
+QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP("bitcoin-core", "(press q to shutdown and continue later)"),
QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP("bitcoin-core", "-maxmempool must be at least %d MB"),
QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP("bitcoin-core", "A fatal internal error occurred, see debug.log for details"),
QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP("bitcoin-core", "Cannot resolve -%s address: '%s'"),
@@ -204,6 +205,8 @@ QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP("bitcoin-core", "SQLiteDatabase: Failed to prepare statement t
QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP("bitcoin-core", "SQLiteDatabase: Failed to read database verification error: %s"),
QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP("bitcoin-core", "SQLiteDatabase: Unexpected application id. Expected %u, got %u"),
QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP("bitcoin-core", "Section [%s] is not recognized."),
+QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP("bitcoin-core", "Settings file could not be read"),
+QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP("bitcoin-core", "Settings file could not be written"),
QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP("bitcoin-core", "Signing transaction failed"),
QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP("bitcoin-core", "Specified -walletdir \"%s\" does not exist"),
QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP("bitcoin-core", "Specified -walletdir \"%s\" is a relative path"),
@@ -242,4 +245,5 @@ QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP("bitcoin-core", "User Agent comment (%s) contains unsafe chara
QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP("bitcoin-core", "Verifying blocks…"),
QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP("bitcoin-core", "Verifying wallet(s)…"),
QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP("bitcoin-core", "Wallet needed to be rewritten: restart %s to complete"),
+QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP("bitcoin-core", "press q to shutdown"),
};
```
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK b59b31ae0b. Being able to use `_()` macro in qt would allow simplifying some code, for example replacing repetitive:
TheCharlatan:
ACK b59b31ae0b
Tree-SHA512: 13d9d86b487a1b6e718ae96c198a0a927c881bf33df318412793ec9efba3a7e59cfa836204f73f5b53ff4c99edce778c11bffaa88138b80e37b71e36df6b816f
2ce7e31d2d docs: Add reference to total.coverage report (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
I couldn't get fuzz coverage to work, so couldn't verify what it would look like if made.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
ACK 2ce7e31d2d
dergoegge:
ACK 2ce7e31d2d
Tree-SHA512: c773ef28f7cc630cb094740805c0d235255e7b0559ac7fed4e8952ade4005335f3787bdd2f8786979e341e914b41c4f3eef02bb4773b15f92d618f1040f53c54
004903ebad test: Add Wallet Unlock Context Manager (Brandon Odiwuor)
Pull request description:
Fixes#28601, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28403#discussion_r1325426430
Add Context Manager to manage the locking and unlocking of locked wallets with a passphrase during testing.
ACKs for top commit:
kevkevinpal:
lgtm ACK [004903e](004903ebad)
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 004903ebad
Tree-SHA512: ab234c167e71531df0d974ff9a31d444f7ce2a1d05aba5ea868cc9452f139845eeb24ca058d88f058bc02482b762adf2d99e63a6640b872cc71a57a0068abfe8
8cfa22a846 build: move -fstack-reuse=none to CORE_CXXFLAGS (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This is not a hardening specific flag, it should be used at all times, regardless of if hardening is enabled or not. Note that this was still the case here, but having this exist in the hardening flags is confusing, and may lead someone to move it inside one of the `use_hardening` blocks, where it would become unused, with `--disable-hardening`.
Noticed while reviewing https://github.com/hebasto/bitcoin/pull/32#discussion_r1363564161.
ACKs for top commit:
theuni:
ACK 8cfa22a846. Agree it's confusing as-is and this better matches the intent.
hebasto:
ACK 8cfa22a846
luke-jr:
utACK 8cfa22a846
TheCharlatan:
ACK 8cfa22a846
Tree-SHA512: 74c3219301398361d06b1ef2257fc9ec18055b1661f8733ee909adefee61e458d70991c32adf0e0450905a7ffbddc99799f5fdac894f4896cfade19f961818df
fa4c6836c9 test: Fix failing time check in rpc_net.py (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This check fails on slow runners, such as s390x qemu.
Fix it by using mocktime.
See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28523#discussion_r1357980527
ACKs for top commit:
0xB10C:
ACK fa4c6836c9
pinheadmz:
ACK fa4c6836c9
brunoerg:
crACK fa4c6836c9
Tree-SHA512: 83fb534682e11e97537dc89de8c16f206f38af1a892a2d5970c02684c05eaea8fc9adba3159f16b2440ca0b3871d513a0562a6f3a38f19a5574a47be0919e42f
In `AddTransactionsToBlock` description comment we have the asuumption
that callers will never pass multiple transactions with the same txid
We are asserting to assume that does not happen.
This is not a hardening specific flag, it should be used at all times,
regardless of if hardening is enabled or not. Note that this was
still the case here, but having this exist in the hardening flags is
confusing, and may lead someone to move it inside one of the `use_hardening`
blocks, where it would become unused, with `--disable-hardening`.
621db2f004 test: assumeutxo file with unknown block hash (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Takes care of one of the open Todos in the assumeutxo functional test. Since an unknown block could be any hash, I simply chose one placeholder, it could also be a random string though.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 621db2f004
pablomartin4btc:
cr ACK 621db2f004
theStack:
ACK 621db2f004
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 621db2f004
Tree-SHA512: ee0438ce619f7348c6f88e39b0ea7ddddb8832956d9034ecc795c6033d5d905c09d11b7d0d5afc38231b2fd091ea7c1bd0a0be99d9c32c4e6357a25d76294142
