This does the following:
* Adds a rfc6979 argument to test_framework/key.py's sign_ecdsa to
select (deterministic) RFC6979-based nonce generation.
* Add a flag in feature_taproot.py's framework called "deterministic".
* Make the Schnorr signing in feature_taproot.py randomized by default,
reverting to the old deterministic (aux_rnd=0x0000...00) behavior
if the deterministic context flag is set.
* Make the ECDSA signing in feature_taproot.py use RFC6979-based nonces
when the deterministic context flag is set (keeping the old randomized
behavior otherwise).
29173d6c6c ubsan: add minisketch exceptions (Cory Fields)
54b5e1aeab Add thin Minisketch wrapper to pick best implementation (Pieter Wuille)
ee9dc71c1b Add basic minisketch tests (Pieter Wuille)
0659f12b13 Add minisketch dependency (Gleb Naumenko)
0eb7928ab8 Add MSVC build configuration for libminisketch (Pieter Wuille)
8bc166d5b1 build: add minisketch build file and include it (Cory Fields)
b2904ceb85 build: add configure checks for minisketch (Cory Fields)
b6487dc4ef Squashed 'src/minisketch/' content from commit 89629eb2c7 (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This takes over #21859, which has [recently switched](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21859#issuecomment-921899200) to my integration branch. A few more build issues came up (and have been fixed) since, and after discussing with sipa it was decided I would open a PR to shepherd any final changes through.
> This adds a `src/minisketch` subtree, taken from the master branch of https://github.com/sipa/minisketch, to prepare for Erlay implementation (see #21515). It gets configured for just supporting 32-bit fields (the only ones we're interested in in the context of Erlay), and some code on top is added:
> * A very basic unit test (just to make sure compilation & running works; actual correctness checking is done through minisketch's own tests).
> * A wrapper in `minisketchwrapper.{cpp,h}` that runs a benchmark to determine which field implementation to use.
Only changes since my last update to the branch in the previous PR have been rebasing on master and fixing an issue with a header in an introduced file.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 29173d6c6c
Tree-SHA512: 1217d3228db1dd0de12c2919314e1c3626c18a416cf6291fec99d37e34fb6eec8e28d9e9fb935f8590273b8836cbadac313a15f05b4fd9f9d3024c8ce2c80d02
22b44fc696 p2p: improve checkaddrman logging with duration in milliseconds (Jon Atack)
ec65bed00e log, timer: add LOG_TIME_MILLIS_WITH_CATEGORY_MSG_ONCE macro (Jon Atack)
325da75a53 log, timer: allow not repeating log message on completion (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This patch:
- updates the `logging/timer.h::Timer` class to allow not repeating the log message on completion
- adds a `LOG_TIME_MILLIS_WITH_CATEGORY_MSG_ONCE` macro that prints the descriptive message when logging the start but not when logging the completion
- updates the checkaddrman logging to log the duration, and renames the function like the `-checkaddrman` configuration option in order to prefix every log message with `CheckAddrman` instead of the longer, less pleasant, and different-from-checkaddrman `ForceCheckAddrman` (the Doxygen documentation on the function already makes clear that it is unaffected by `m_consistency_check_ratio`).
before
```
2021-09-21T18:42:50Z [opencon] Addrman checks started: new 64864, tried 1690, total 66554
2021-09-21T18:42:50Z [opencon] Addrman checks completed successfully
```
after
```
2021-09-21T18:42:50Z [opencon] CheckAddrman: new 64864, tried 1690, total 66554 started
2021-09-21T18:42:50Z [opencon] CheckAddrman: completed (76.21ms)
```
To test, build and run bitcoind with `-debug=addrman -checkaddrman=<n>` for a value of `n` in the range of, say, 10 to 40.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 22b44fc696
Tree-SHA512: 658c0dfaaa9d07092e2418f2d05007c58cc35be6593f22b3c592ce793334a885dd92dacc46bdeddc9d37939cf11174660a094c07c0fa117fbb282953aa45a94d
aa1a4c9204 Add file validation to savemempool RPC test (lsilva01)
871e64d22f Add filename to savemempool RPC result (lsilva01)
Pull request description:
Currently, if the user calls the `savemempool` RPC method, there is no way to know
where the file was created (unless the user knows internal implementation details).
This PR adds a return message stating the file name and path where the mempool was saved and changes `mempool_persist.py` to validate this new return message.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK aa1a4c9204
Tree-SHA512: e8b1dd0a8976e5eb15f7476c9651e492d2c621a67e0b726721fa7a2ae0ddd272ee28b87a2d0c650bd635e07fa96bdefe77bece4deb6486ef3ee9a4f83423a840
The previous diff touched most files in ./test/, so bump the headers to
avoid having to touch them again for a bump later.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./test/
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
facc352648 test: Implicitly sync after generate*, unless opted out (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The most frequent failure in functional tests are intermittent races. Fixing such bugs is cumbersome because it involves:
* Noticing the failure
* Fetching and reading the log to determine the test case that failed
* Adding a `self.sync_all()` where it was forgotten
* Spamming out a pr and waiting for review, which is already sparse
Also, writing a linter to catch those is not possible, nor is review effective in finding these bugs prior to merge.
Fix all future intermittent races caused by a missing sync_block call by calling `sync_all` implicitly after each `generate*`, unless opted out. This ensures that the code is race-free (with regards to blocks) when the tests pass once, instead of our current approach where the code can never be guaranteed to be race-free.
There are some scripted-diff cleanups (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22567), but they will be submitted in a follow-up to reduce the conflicts in this pull.
ACKs for top commit:
lsilva01:
tACK facc352 on Ubuntu 20.04
brunoerg:
tACK facc352648 on MacOS 11.6
Tree-SHA512: 046a40a066b4a3bd28a3077bd654fa8887442dd1f0ec6fd11671865809ef02376f126eb667a1320ebd67b6e372c78c00dbf8bd25d86ed86f1d9a25363103ed97
420695c193 contrib: recognize CJDNS seeds as such (Vasil Dimov)
f9c28330a0 net: take the first 4 random bits from CJDNS addresses in GetGroup() (Vasil Dimov)
29ff79c0a2 net: relay CJDNS addresses even if we are not connected to CJDNS (Vasil Dimov)
d96f8d304c net: don't skip CJDNS from GetNetworkNames() (Vasil Dimov)
c2d751abba net: take CJDNS into account in CNetAddr::GetReachabilityFrom() (Vasil Dimov)
9b43b3b257 test: extend feature_proxy.py to test CJDNS (Vasil Dimov)
508eb258fd test: remove default argument of feature_proxy.py:node_test() (Vasil Dimov)
6387f397b3 net: recognize CJDNS addresses as such (Vasil Dimov)
e6890fcb44 net: don't skip CJDNS from GetNetworksInfo() (Vasil Dimov)
e9d90d3c11 net: introduce a new config option to enable CJDNS (Vasil Dimov)
78f456c576 net: recognize CJDNS from ParseNetwork() (Vasil Dimov)
de01e312b3 net: use -proxy for connecting to the CJDNS network (Vasil Dimov)
aedd02ef27 net: make it possible to connect to CJDNS addresses (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
CJDNS overview
=====
CJDNS is like a distributed, shared VPN with multiple entry points where every participant can reach any other participant. All participants use addresses from the `fc00::/8` network (reserved IPv6 range). Installation and configuration is done outside of applications, similarly to VPN (either in the host/OS or on the network router).
Motivation
=====
Even without this PR it is possible to connect two Bitcoin Core nodes through CJDNS manually by using e.g. `-addnode` in environments where CJDNS is set up. However, this PR is necessary for address relay to work properly and automatic connections to be made to CJDNS peers. I.e. to make CJDNS a first class citizen network like IPv4, IPv6, Tor and I2P.
Considerations
=====
An address from the `fc00::/8` network, could mean two things:
1. Part of a local network, as defined in RFC 4193. Like `10.0.0.0/8`. Bitcoin Core could be running on a machine with such address and have peers with those (e.g. in a local network), but those addresses are not relayed to other peers because they are not globally routable on the internet.
2. Part of the CJDNS network. This is like Tor or I2P - if we have connectivity to that network then we could reach such peers and we do relay them to other peers.
So, Bitcoin Core needs to be able to tell which one is it when it encounters a bare `fc00::/8` address, e.g. from `-externalip=` or by looking up the machine's own addresses. Thus a new config option is introduced `-cjdnsreacable`:
* `-cjdnsreacable=0`: it is assumed a `fc00::/8` address is a private IPv6 (1.)
* `-cjdnsreacable=1`: it is assumed a `fc00::/8` address is a CJDNS one (2.)
After setting up CJDNS outside of Bitcoin Core, a node operator only needs to enable this option.
Addresses from P2P relay/gossip don't need that because they are properly tagged as IPv6 or as CJDNS.
For testing
=====
```
[fc32:17ea:e415:c3bf:9808:149d:b5a2:c9aa]:8333
[fc68:7026:cb27:b014:5910:e609:dcdb:22a2]:8333
[fcb3:dc50:e1ae:7998:7dc0:7fa6:4582:8e46]:8333
[fcc7:be49:ccd1:dc91:3125:f0da:457d:8ce]:8333
[fcf2:d9e:3a25:4eef:8f84:251b:1b4d:c596]:8333
```
ACKs for top commit:
dunxen:
ACK 420695c
jonatack:
re-ACK 420695c193 per `git range-diff 23ae793 4fbff39 420695c`
laanwj:
Code review ACK 420695c193
Tree-SHA512: 21559886271aa84671d52b120fa3fa5a50fdcf0fcb26e5b32049c56fab0d606438d19dd366a9c8ce612d3894237ae6d552ead3338b326487e3534399b88a317a
80dc829be7 tests: Calculate fees more similarly to CFeeRate::GetFee (Andrew Chow)
ce2cc44afd tests: Test for assertion when feerate is rounded down (Andrew Chow)
0fbaef9676 fees: Always round up fee calculated from a feerate (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When calculating the fee for a feerate, it is possible that the final calculation will have fractional satoshis. Currently those are ignored via truncation which results in the absolute fee being rounded down. Rounding down is problematic because it results in a feerate that is slightly lower than the feerate represented by the `CFeeRate` object. A slightly lower feerate particularly causes issues for coin selection as it can trigger an assertion error. To avoid potentially underpaying the feerate (and the assertion), always round up the calculated fee.
A test is added for the assertion, along with a comment explaining what happens.
It is unlikely that a user can trigger this as it requires a very specific set of rounding errors to occur as well as the transaction not needing any change and being right on the lower bound of the exact match window. However I was able to trigger the assertion while running coin selection simulations, albeit after thousands of transactions and with some weird feerates.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 80dc829be7
promag:
Tested ACK 80dc829be7.
lsilva01:
tACK 80dc829
meshcollider:
utACK 80dc829be7
Tree-SHA512: fe26684c60f236cab48ea6a4600c141ce766dbe59504ec77595dcbd7fd0b34559acc617007f4f499c9155d8fda0a336954413410ba862b19c765c0cfac79d642
The default bool argument makes it harder to read because the last but
one argument is also bool. Pass all of them as named arguments to
increase readability.
Another bool argument will be added to indicate whether to test CJDNS.
Co-authored-by: Jon Atack <jon@atack.com>
Unless `-deprecatedrpc=fees` is passed, top level
fee fields are no longer returned for mempool entries.
Add instructions to field help on how to access
deprecated fields, update help text for readability,
and include units. This is important to help
avoid any confusion as users move from deprecated
fields to the fee fields object (credit: jonatack).
This affects `getmempoolentry`, `getrawmempool`,
`getmempoolancestors`, and `getmempooldescendants`
Modify `test/functional/mempool_packages.py` and
`test/functional/rpc_fundrawtransaction.py` tests
to no longer use deprecated fields.
Co-authored-by: jonatack <jon@atack.com>
61ec0539b2 [MOVEONLY] reorder functions in addrman_impl.h and addrman.cpp (John Newbery)
2095df7b7b [addrman] Add Add_() inner function, fix Add() return semantics (John Newbery)
2658eb6d68 [addrman] Rename Add_() to AddSingle() (John Newbery)
e58598e833 [addrman] Add doxygen comment to AddrMan::Add() (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Previously, Add() would return true if the function created a new
AddressInfo object, even if that object could not be successfully
entered into the new table and was deleted. That would happen if the new
table position was already taken and the existing entry could not be
removed.
Instead, return true if the new AddressInfo object is successfully
entered into the new table. This fixes a bug in the "Added %i addresses"
log, which would not always accurately log how many addresses had been
added.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 61ec0539b2
mzumsande:
ACK 61ec0539b2
shaavan:
ACK 61ec0539b2
Tree-SHA512: 276f1e8297d4b6d411d05d06ffc7c176f6290a784da039926ab6c471a8ed8e9159ab4f56c893b1285737ae292954930f0d28012d89dfb3f2f825d7df41016feb
d891ae7681 Introduce new V4 format addrman (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
#23306 effectively changed the on-disk format in an incompatible way: old deserializers cannot deal with multiple entries for the same IP.
Introduce a `V4_MULTIPORT` format, and increment the compatibility base, so that old versions correctly recognize it as an incompatible future version, rather than corruption.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK d891ae7681
ajtowns:
utACK d891ae7681
vasild:
ACK d891ae7681
Tree-SHA512: de2153beb59152504ee0656dd0cc0b879b09136eb07e3ce0426d2fea778adfabacebbce5cf1a9a65dc99ad4e99cda42ab26743fe672fb82a9fbfec49c4cccb4d
d2c4904ef7 test: MiniWallet: more deterministic coin selection for coinbase UTXOs (oldest first) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The coin selection strategy for MiniWallet is quite straight-forward: simply pick a single UTXO with the largest value:
ab25ef8c7f/test/functional/test_framework/wallet.py (L173-L174)
If there are several candidates with the same value, however, it is not clear which one is taken. This can be particularly problematic for coinbase outputs with fixed block subsidy, since spending could lead to a `bad-txns-premature-spend-of-coinbase` reject if an UTXO from a too-recent block is picked. Introduce block height as second criteria (saved in `self._utxos` in the methods `generate(...)` and `rescan_utxos(...)`), in order to avoid potential issues with coinbases that are not matured yet. If there is a tie between coinbase UTXOs and non-coinbase UTXOs (the latter are added via `scan_tx(...)`), prefer the non-coinbase UTXOs, since those don't need to mature.
The issue came up while refactoring the test rpc_blockchain.py, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23371#discussion_r737401936 (PR #23371).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK d2c4904ef7
shaavan:
ACK d2c4904ef7
Tree-SHA512: 15d67b42fb8b77fd53022ea2ab8a6ed2b615567f3ce73bab16c06bfcb687c1a04dcb0360d0c2287c526b604cd3ac5eef7b14ce46fc31e23047ce1a3290027306
2600db6c36 test: fix misleading fee unit in mempool_limit.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The PR is a follow-up to #22543. The helper `send_large_txs` in its current interface has a fee_rate parameter, implying that it would create a transaction with exactly that rate. Unfortunately, this fee rate is only passed to MiniWallet's `create_self_transfer` method, which can't know that we append several tx outputs after, increasing the tx's vsize and decreasing it's fee rate accordingly.
In our case, the fee rate is off by several orders of magnitude, as the tx's vsize changes changes from 96 to 67552 vbytes (>700x), i.e. the value passed to this function is neither really a fee rate nor an absolute fee, but something in-between, which is very confusing. It was suggested to simply in-line this helper as it's currently only used in this single test (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22543#discussion_r701685136, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22543#issuecomment-918986896), but I could imagine that this helper may also become useful for other tests and may be moved to a library (e.g. wallet.py) in the future.
Clarify the interface by passing an absolute fee that is deducted in the end (and also verified, via testmempoolaccept) and also describe how we come up with the value passed. On master, the comment says that the fee rate needs to increased "massively"; this word is also removed because the fee rate only needs to be higher for the test to succeed.
ACKs for top commit:
stratospher:
ACK 2600db6.
Tree-SHA512: 0bfacc3fa87603970d86c1d0186e51511f6c20c64b0559e19e7e12a68647f79dcb4f436000dee718fd832ce6a68e3bbacacb29145e0287811f1cb03d2f316843
Previously, Add() would return true if the function created a new
AddressInfo object, even if that object could not be successfully
entered into the new table and was deleted. That would happen if the new
table position was already taken and the existing entry could not be
removed.
Instead, return true if the new AddressInfo object is successfully
entered into the new table. This fixes a bug in the "Added %i addresses"
log, which would not always accurately log how many addresses had been
added.
p2p_addrv2_relay.py and p2p_addr_relay.py need to be updated since they
were incorrectly asserting on the buggy log (assuming that addresses are
added to addrman, when there could in fact be new table position
collisions that prevent some of those address records from being added).
The coin selection strategy for MiniWallet is quite straight-forward: simply
pick a single UTXO with the largest value:
self._utxos = sorted(self._utxos, key=lambda k: k['value'])
utxo_to_spend = utxo_to_spend or self._utxos.pop()
If there are several candidates with the same value, however, it is not clear
which one is taken. This can be particularly problematic for coinbase outputs
with fixed block subsidy, since spending could lead to a
'bad-txns-premature-spend-of-coinbase' reject if an UTXO from a too-recent
block is picked. Introduce block height as second criteria (saved in
self._utxos in the methods generate(...) and rescan_utxos(...)), in order to
avoid potential issues with coinbases that are not matured yet.
92617b7a75 effectively changed the
on-disk format in an incompatible way: old deserializers cannot
deal with multiple entries for the same IP.
Introduce a V4_MULTIPORT format, and increment the compatibility base,
so that old versions correctly recognize it as an incompatible future
version.
e9ade032f3 tests: Add feature_segwit.py --descriptors to test_runner.py (Andrew Chow)
ae6cbcc909 tests: restrict feature_segwit legacy wallet import tests (Andrew Chow)
1d13c44a4c tests: Use descriptors for feature_segwit multisig setup (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`feature_segwit.py` has tests for some legacy wallet behavior, but otherwise does not really need the legacy wallet. Those parts now require `--legacy-wallet` to be provided (as with other legacy wallet tests). Other parts of the test are changed to work with descriptor wallets as well.
ACKs for top commit:
lsilva01:
tACK e9ade03
Tree-SHA512: 4ae76a4d2a8d318e7f8ad4c984748e3cdd67ed00359fcd798a08492ed9399b1d01be88c9ebea3d6c996fbe190cf41708a15c98f088f0cb5c47d6d00fff258944
45827fd718 test: check for block reject reasons in p2p_segwit.py [2/2] (Sebastian Falbesoner)
4eb532ff8b test: check for block reject reasons in p2p_segwit.py [1/2] (Sebastian Falbesoner)
b1488c4dce test: fix reference to block processing test in p2p_segwit.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
In the test `p2p_segwit.py`, there are many instances where we send a segwit block to a node with the expectation that it is rejected. For this purpose, the helper function `test_witness_block` exists which allows also to check for a specific reject `reason` that is asserted in the debug log:
502d22ceed/test/functional/p2p_segwit.py (L119-L120)
This PR aims to increase the precision of the tests by adding the expected reject reasons to all `test_witness_block` call instances (found via `grep`ing after `test_witness_block(.*accepted=False`). For some blocks that are rejected due to failed script verification, the exact reason is only shown in the debug log if parallel script verification is disabled. For this reason, the addition of the reasons is split up in two commits:
* first, all instances are tackled that are not subject to script verification, i.e. it doesn't matter whether parallel script verification is enabled or not (e.g. `bad-blk-weight`, `bad-witness-merkle-match`...)
* then, we explicitely set `-par=1` to only use one script thread, and add the remaining reasons (`non-mandatory-script-verify-flag` with the more specific reason in parantheses)
ACKs for top commit:
stratospher:
tested ACK 45827fd.
Tree-SHA512: 00f31867f11d48b38a42b1e79a1303bda1c797ccf3d8c73e6107d70b062604d51ee2a3f2251e7f068dfafdaf09469d27dfee438d9bc9ebaef7febc4b6ef90a95
66f6efc70a rpc: improve TransactionDescriptionString() "generated" help (Jon Atack)
296cfa312f test: add listtransactions/listsinceblock "trusted" coverage (Jon Atack)
d95913fc43 rpc: fix "trusted" description in TransactionDescriptionString (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
The RPC gettransaction, listtransactions, and listsinceblock helps returned by `TransactionDescriptionString()` inform the user that the `trusted` boolean field is only present if the transaction is trusted and safe to spend from.
The field is in fact returned by `WalletTxToJSON()` when the transaction has 0 confirmations (or negative confirmations, if conflicted), and it can be true or false.
This patch fixes the help, adds test coverage, and touches up the help for the neighboring `generate` field.
ACKs for top commit:
rajarshimaitra:
tACK 66f6efc70a
theStack:
Tested ACK 66f6efc70a
Tree-SHA512: 4c2127765b82780e07bbdbf519d27163d414d9f15598e01e02210f210e6009be344c84951d7274e747b1386991d4c3b082cd25aebe885fb8cf0b92d57178f68e
9c1052a521 wallet: Default new wallets to descriptor wallets (Andrew Chow)
f19ad40463 rpc, wallet: Descriptor wallets are no longer experimental (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Changes the default wallet type from legacy to descriptors. Descriptor wallets will now by the default type. Additionally, descriptor wallets will no longer be marked as experimental.
This follows the timeline proposed in #20160
ACKs for top commit:
lsilva01:
Tested ACK 9c1052a521 on Ubuntu 20.04
prayank23:
tACK 9c1052a521
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 9c1052a521
Tree-SHA512: 834e6fec88e0c18673af7ebe135bd5333694d1be502164eb93a90e3e76c27974165aa4e59426945100c88e4eca07356e16886ef5b05cf789683ecb23fc71a12a
fa6c62f34b test: Replace log with assert_equal in wallet_abandonconflict (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This will make the test fail as soon as the bug is fixed, forcing it to
be updated. Otherwise, the bug might be fixed (or made worse)
accidentally, leaving the test in an inconsistent state.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Concept and code-review ACK fa6c62f34b
brunoerg:
tACK fa6c62f34b
Tree-SHA512: 416f72380164bf3f93332a5cfa81a8e61d8ada3714ef6815889ed3cf2d16c09411760dee4acf19629227e565b765b3dea491a0b23efd38eb370254cfadf7c441
fadf1186c8 p2p: Use mocktime for ping timeout (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It is slightly confusing to use mocktime for some times, but not others.
Start fixing that by making the ping timeout use mocktime.
The only downside would be that tests that use mocktime disconnect peers after this patch. However, I don't think this is an issue, as the inactivity check is already disabled for all functional tests after commit 6d76b57ca0. Only one unit test needed the inactivity check disabled as part of this patch.
A nice side effect of this patch is that the `p2p_ping` functional test now runs 4 seconds faster.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fadf1186c8
Tree-SHA512: e9e7b21040a89d9d574b3038f85a67e6336de6cd6e41aa286769cd03cada6e75a94ec01700e052e56d822ef85d7813cc06bf7e67b81543eff8917a16cdccf942
This will make the test fail as soon as the bug is fixed, forcing it to
be updated. Otherwise, the bug might be fixed (or made worse)
accidentally, leaving the test in an inconsistent state.
b7884dd1b6 test: bip125-replaceable in listsinceblock (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for bip125-replaceable in listsinceblock. I added this test into wallet_listtransactions.py instead of putting it into wallet_listsinceblock.py to utilize the scenario already created in wallet_listtransactions.py and avoid repetition.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK b7884dd1b6
promag:
ACK b7884dd1b6.
stratospher:
tested ACK b7884dd. Verified the bip125-replaceable status of some transactions with listsinceblock.
lsilva01:
tACK b7884dd on Ubuntu 20.04
Tree-SHA512: 510dfe5a6f9d68e5a656514d356dc8fe99324296ed8caa78f0eb4b6c6906cf70b1fb50bde80aa6f61d726b2fa1d4ce1fe48c635ce24285588e56ceff92291617
