d1a0004621 test: add coverage for invalid parameters for `rescanblockchain` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following errors:
2bd9aa5a44/src/wallet/rpc/transactions.cpp (L880-L894)
ACKs for top commit:
w0xlt:
reACK d1a0004621
Tree-SHA512: c357fbda3d261e4d06a29d2a5350482db5f97a815adf59abdac1971eb19b69cfd4d54e4d21836851e2e3b116aa2a820ea1437c7aededf86b06df435cca16ac90
This introduces an insignificant performance penalty, as it means locator
construction needs to use the skiplist-based CBlockIndex::GetAncestor()
function instead of the lookup-based CChain, but avoids the need for
callers to have access to a relevant CChain object.
The rule against difficulty adjustments changing by more than a factor of 4 can
be helpful for anti-DoS measures in contexts where we lack a full headers
chain, so expose this functionality separately and in the narrow case where we
only know the height, new value, and old value.
Includes fuzz test by Martin Zumsande.
Move ChainstateManager options into m_options struct to simplify class
initialization, organize class members, and to name external option variables
differently than internal state variables.
This change was originally in #25862, but it was suggested to split off in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25862#discussion_r951459817 so it could
be merged earlier and reduce conflicts with other PRs.
4fef534428 wallet: use GetChange() when computing waste (S3RK)
87e0ef9031 wallet: use GetChange() in tx building (S3RK)
15e97a6886 wallet: add SelectionResult::GetChange (S3RK)
72cad28da0 wallet: calculate and store min_viable_change (S3RK)
e3210a7225 wallet: account for preselected inputs in target (S3RK)
f8e796348b wallet: add SelectionResult::Merge (S3RK)
06f558e4e2 wallet: accurate SelectionResult::m_target (S3RK)
c8cf08ea74 wallet: ensure m_min_change_target always covers change fee (S3RK)
Pull request description:
Benefits:
1. more accurate waste calculation for knapsack. Waste calculation is now consistent with tx building code. Before we always assumed change for knapsack even when the solution is changeless4.
2. simpler tx building code. Only create change output when it's needed
3. makes it easier to correctly account for fees for CPFP inputs (should be done in a follow up)
In the first three commits we fix the code to accurately track selection target in `SelectionResult::m_target`
Then we introduce new variable `min_change` that represents the minimum viable change amount
Then we introduce `SelectionResult::GetChange()` which incapsulates dropping change for fee logic and uses correct values of `SelectionResult::m_target`
Then we use `SelectionResult::GetChange()` in both tx building and waste calculation code
This PR is a refactoring and shouldn't change the behaviour.
There is only one known small change (arguably a bug fix). Before we dropped change output if it's smaller than `cost_of_change` after paying change fees. This is incorrect as `cost_of_change` already includes `change_fee`.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 4fef534428
Xekyo:
crACK 4fef534428
furszy:
Code review ACK 4fef5344
w0xlt:
ACK 4fef534428
Tree-SHA512: 31a7455d4129bc39a444da0f16ad478d690d4d9627b2b8fdb5605facc6488171926bf02f5d7d9a545b2b59efafcf5bb3d404005e4da15c7b44b3f7d441afb941
1dc03dda05 [doc] remove non-signaling mentions of BIP125 (glozow)
32024d40f0 scripted-diff: remove mention of BIP125 from non-signaling var names (glozow)
Pull request description:
We have pretty thorough documentation of our RBF policy in doc/policy/mempool-replacements.md. It enumerates each rule with several sentences of rationale. Also, each rule pretty much has its own function (3 and 4 share one), with extensive comments. The doc states explicitly that our rules are similar but differ from BIP125, and contains a record of historical changes to RBF policy.
We should not use "BIP125" as synonymous with our RBF policy because:
- Our RBF policy is different from what is specified in BIP125, for example:
- the BIP does not mention our rule about the replacement feerate being higher (our Rule 6)
- the BIP uses minimum relay feerate for Rule 4, while we have used incremental relay feerate since #9380
- the "inherited signaling" question (CVE-2021-31876). Call it discrepancy, ambiguous wording, doc misinterpretation, or implementation details, I would recommend users refer to doc/policy/mempool-replacements.md
- the signaling policy is configurable, see #25353
- Our RBF policy may change further
- We have already marked BIP125 as only "partially implemented" in docs/bips.md since 1fd49eb498
- See comments from people who are not me recently:
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25038#discussion_r909507429
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25575#issuecomment-1179519204
This PR removes all non-signaling mentions of BIP125 (if people feel strongly, we can remove all mentions of BIP125 period). It may be useful to refer to the concept of "tx opts in to RBF if it has at least one nSequence less than (0xffffffff - 1)" as "BIP125 signaling" because:
- It is succint.
- It has already been widely marketed as BIP125 opt-in signaling.
- Our API uses it when referring to signaling (e.g. getmempoolentry["bip125-replaceable"] and wallet error message "not BIP 125 replaceable"). Changing those is more invasive.
- If/when we have other ways to signal in the future, we can disambiguate them this way. See #25038 which proposes another way of signaling, and where I pulled these commits from.
Alternatives:
- Changing our policy to match BIP125. This doesn't make sense as, for example, we would have to remove the requirement that a replacement tx has a higher feerate (Rule 6).
- Changing BIP125 to match what we have. This doesn't make sense as it would be a significant change to a BIP years after it was finalized and already used as a spec to implement RBF in other places.
- Document our policy as a new BIP and give it a number. This might make sense if we don't expect things to change a lot, and can be done as a next step.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
ACK 1dc03dda05
ariard:
ACK 1dc03dda
t-bast:
ACK 1dc03dda05
Tree-SHA512: a3adc2039ec5785892d230ec442e50f47f7062717392728152bbbe27ce1c564141f85253143f53cb44e1331cf47476d74f5d2f4b3cd873fc3433d7a0aa783e02
c3b099ace0 wallet, tests: Test bumpfee's max input weight calculation (Andrew Chow)
116a620ce7 Make DUMMY_CHECKER availble outside of script/sign.cpp (Andrew Chow)
ff638323d1 test, bumpfee: Check that psbtbumpfee can bump txs with external inputs (Andrew Chow)
1bc8106d4c bumpfee: be able to bump fee of a tx with external inputs (Andrew Chow)
31dd3dc9e5 bumpfee: Clear scriptSigs and scriptWitnesses before calculated max size (Andrew Chow)
a0c3afb898 bumpfee: extract weights of external inputs when bumping fee (Andrew Chow)
612f1e44fe bumpfee: Calculate fee by looking up UTXOs (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR allows `psbtbumpfee` to return a PSBT for transactions that contain external inputs. This does not work for bumping in the GUI nor `bumpfee` because these need private keys available to sign and send the transaction. But `psbtbumpfee` returns a psbt, so it is fine to not be able to sign.
In order to correctly estimate the size of the inputs for coin selection, the fee bumper will use the size of the inputs of the transaction being bumped. Because the sizes of signatures are not guaranteed, for external inputs, the fee bumper will verify the scripts with a special SignatureChecker which will compute the weight of all of the signatures in that input, and compute their weights if those signatures were maximally sized. This allows the fee bumper to obtain a max size estimate for each external input.
Builds on #23201 as it relies on the ability to pass weights in to coin selection.
Closes#23189
ACKs for top commit:
ishaanam:
reACK c3b099ace0
t-bast:
Re-ran my tests agains c3b099ace0, ACK
Tree-SHA512: 40016ec52d351430977579cfa2694c7e6764f42c9ce09d3a6f1753b767f86053f296d9de988248df033be6d725d67badbf2a5ef82c8ace23c61487729b7691e5
eeee5ada23 Make adjusted time type safe (MacroFake)
fa3be799fe Add time helpers (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
This makes follow-ups easier to review. Also, it makes sense by itself.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK eeee5ada23. Confirmed type changes and equivalent code changes only.
Tree-SHA512: 51bf1ae5428552177286113babdd49e82459d6c710a07b6e80a0a045d373cf51045ee010461aba98e0151d8d71b9b3b5f8f73e302d46ba4558e0b55201f99e9f
706c8e0969 refactor: use `strprintf` for creating unknown-service-flag string (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
No need to use a stringstream here. The trivial change can be verified by running the functional test `rpc_net.py`:
c73c8d53fe/test/functional/rpc_net.py (L181-L184)
As far as I could tell, this is the only instace left where we used `std::ostringstream` for the creation of simple strings (in `FormatSubVersion` using a stream makes sense since the number of placeholders is not constant).
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
ACK 706c8e0969
Tree-SHA512: 069cea29aef03996ae16a0dc3ed87b1b2cf2ab0bf5987c225b10da12d0f4b62b7c3faf3a169c0b912eb2ad60c6ea0a09a622be7eaadad78cee0463ef4ffc0e19
Rather than setting the service bit `NODE_NETWORK` first and then unset
it, start out the bare minimum flags that every node serves and only add
`NODE_NETWORK` if we are running as a non-pruned node.
for verbose log messages for development or debugging only, as bitcoind may run
more slowly, that are more granular/frequent than the Debug log level, i.e. for
very high-frequency, low-level messages to be logged distinctly from
higher-level, less-frequent debug logging that could still be usable in production.
An example would be to log higher-level peer events (connection, disconnection,
misbehavior, eviction) as Debug, versus Trace for low-level, high-volume p2p
messages in the BCLog::NET category. This will enable the user to log only the
former without the latter, in order to focus on high-level peer management events.
With respect to the name, "trace" is suggested as the most granular level
in resources like the following:
- https://sematext.com/blog/logging-levels
- https://howtodoinjava.com/log4j2/logging-levels
Update the test framework and add test coverage.
- add a -loglevel=<level>|<category:level> config option to allow users
to set a global -loglevel and category-specific log levels. LogPrintLevel
messages with a higher severity level than -loglevel will not be printed
in the debug log.
- for now, this config option is debug-only during the migration to
severity-based logging
- update unit and functional tests
Co-authored-by: "Jon Atack <jon@atack.com>"
02dea9a47f tests: Use mocktime for wallet encryption timeout (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The intermittent wallet_encryption.py failures are related to differences in time between python and std::chrono. We can avoid this entirely by using mocktime. This also allows us to test for the exact unlocking time rather than that it is greater than expected.
Fixes#25482
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 02dea9a47f
vasild:
ACK 02dea9a47f
Tree-SHA512: 5a5489f5cd2569c824bf5b3d839be0c632ed27627c0eff65dda63c143a8d1174fe3252acba8102b4242a9ddf42d82bfe79babad68f1beeb83eb251386058e039
0cb6d2aec6 Bugfix: Wallet: Document expectations for AddWalletFlags (now InitWalletFlags) correctly (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Includes some slight refactoring (return type changed, current status checked)
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 0cb6d2aec6
w0xlt:
ACK 0cb6d2aec6
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 0cb6d2aec6. This is a clarifying change, and should prevent the InitWalletFlags method being called incorrectly. I left a comment suggestion, but feel free to ignore it.
Tree-SHA512: fa18e9471b5e89d35cbc01526e6d4dbe4eee8faa9646847248909af1751b33014a6f9a42fe70a1331c0d73adea79008b8fc3ae2b51a641eba3e36d5c631327f6
When bumping the fee of a transaction containing external inputs,
determine the weights of those inputs. Because signatures can have a
variable size, the script is executed with a special SignatureChecker
which will compute the total weight of the signatures in the transaction
and the weight if they were all maximum size signatures. This allows us
to compute the maximum weight of the input for use during coin
selection.
