7d07192dde Add src/qt/android/.gitignore (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR makes `git` ignore files created by `make apk`.
ACKs for top commit:
icota:
ACK 7d07192dde
Tree-SHA512: 4be20bd84830217a10d8ea7634799e71ed50be73f4f60c91c56311a2c95b22ff1f28d3b7bc077f1417318bb75e446e3fc3bdbf9dbc037b4cbc8428f0875f2c77
13650fe2e5 [policy] detect unsorted packages (glozow)
9ef643e21b [doc] add release note for package testmempoolaccept (glozow)
c4259f4b7e [test] functional test for packages in RPCs (glozow)
9ede34a6f2 [rpc] allow multiple txns in testmempoolaccept (glozow)
ae8e6df709 [policy] limit package sizes (glozow)
c9e1a26d1f [fuzz] add ProcessNewPackage call in tx_pool fuzzer (glozow)
363e3d916c [test] unit tests for ProcessNewPackage (glozow)
cd9a11ac96 [test] make submit optional in CreateValidMempoolTransaction (glozow)
2ef187941d [validation] package validation for test accepts (glozow)
578148ded6 [validation] explicit Success/Failure ctors for MempoolAcceptResult (glozow)
b88d77aec5 [policy] Define packages (glozow)
249f43f3cc [refactor] add option to disable RBF (glozow)
897e348f59 [coins/mempool] extend CCoinsViewMemPool to track temporary coins (glozow)
42cf8b25df [validation] make CheckSequenceLocks context-free (glozow)
Pull request description:
This PR enables validation dry-runs of packages through the `testmempoolaccept` RPC. The expectation is that the results returned from `testmempoolaccept` are what you'd get from test-then-submitting each transaction individually, in that order (this means the package is expected to be sorted in topological order, for now at least). The validation is also atomic: in the case of failure, it immediately halts and may return "unfinished" `MempoolAcceptResult`s for transactions that weren't fully validated. The API for 1 transaction stays the same.
**Motivation:**
- This allows you to test validity for transaction chains (e.g. with multiple spending paths and where you don't want to broadcast yet); closes#18480.
- It's also a first step towards package validation in a minimally invasive way.
- The RPC commit happens to close#21074 by clarifying the "allowed" key.
There are a few added restrictions on the packages, mostly to simplify the logic for areas that aren't critical to main package use cases:
- No package can have conflicts, i.e. none of them can spend the same inputs, even if it would be a valid BIP125 replacement.
- The package cannot conflict with the mempool, i.e. RBF is disabled.
- The total count of the package cannot exceed 25 (the default descendant count limit), and total size cannot exceed 101KvB (the default descendant size limit).
If you're looking for review comments and github isn't loading them, I have a gist compiling some topics of discussion [here](https://gist.github.com/glozow/c3acaf161c95bba491fce31585b2aaf7)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review re-ACK 13650fe2e5
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 13650fe2e5
ariard:
ACK 13650fe
Tree-SHA512: 8c5cbfa91a6c714e1c8710bb281d5ff1c5af36741872a7c5df6b24874d6272b4a09f816cb8a4c7de33ef8e1c2a2c252c0df5105b7802f70bc6ff821ed7cc1a2f
8caf60dbbe move-only: Group and re-order CAddrMan members by access type (Hennadii Stepanov)
5cd7f8abe3 refactor: Do not expose CAddrMan members as protected without need (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR is split from #19238 as all of its commits are trivial to review.
The last commit is easy to review with `git diff --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`.
Addressed the following comments from #19238:
- 130b82ff35 (r550865131)
> Can you consolidate all the private members and protected members to be next to each other? Multiple private and protected access specifiers make this harder to read than is necessary.
- 130b82ff35 (r557271783)
> Yeah, class declaration is easier to read if there is just one instance of `public:`, `protected:` and `private:` (in that order).
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK 8caf60dbbe
laanwj:
Code review ACK 8caf60dbbe
jarolrod:
ACK 8caf60dbbe
vasild:
ACK 8caf60dbbe
Tree-SHA512: e6127fc658da7876e36f22e2fae162dc19502ed7f8e931fdebc827dabd627e5346c6fbe6f6d0cd27fd3e5c96690ff35022ff6b48f2747b748ebd66a45c851c2b
df4c81fda4 English translations update (Hennadii Stepanov)
bfb53ddda9 scripted-diff: Fix ellipsis after pr20773 (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Update for Transifex.
After changing translator comments in #332 this update will show if Transifex triggers strings to be re-translated.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK df4c81fda4
jarolrod:
ACK df4c81fda4
Tree-SHA512: 1e54812bc04db6ae39e0b4d735b220ed8730a9941b17a0a2d09e21bcdd08e829adba86c35cf43c9be5e492ccb13e53a90149fcd7d6c0f5fdd022b978a1ff785c
cb7eba2a57 build: Use Qt archive of the same version as the compiled binaries (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes broken Android APK build when the `depends/sources` directory contains Qt source archives of different versions (e.g., Qt version update [pull request](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22054) in CI with the cached `depends/sources` directory).
This is an alternative to #22058.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK cb7eba2a57
laanwj:
Code review ACK cb7eba2a57
Tree-SHA512: cf63a9809fba5cb13719d7e7bb5afc718a2cff5233b0670d30d30a0018d91278fcfc2a1b9ae8b84e8e3a52c95157bc465603cc754bb8a9d1a3d62415f01ad70f
6fe0516858 contrib: add torv3 seed nodes for testnet, drop v2 ones (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Replace the ancient (2015) Tor V2 hardcoded seeds with new Tor V3 ones. This needs to be done before 0.22 to make sure onion-only testnet nodes can still connect to the network. Continues #21560.
Ways to test:
- Re-generate ` src/chainparamsseeds.h` with `cd contrib/seeds && python3 generate-seeds.py . > ../../src/chainparamsseeds.h`, check if git tree stays the same.
- Create a new testnet node with `bitcoind -testnet -onlynet=onion -proxy=127.0.0.1:9050` (or delete `~/.bitcoin/testnet3/peers.dat`), check if it is able to connect to the network and get blocks.
- Check if the addresses are connectable for ex.:
```python3
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import subprocess
with open('contrib/seeds/nodes_test.txt') as f:
for line in (line for line in (line.rstrip().split('#', 1)[0] for line in f) if line):
subprocess.call(["nc", "-v", "-x", "127.0.0.1:9050", "-z"] + line.split(':'))
```
Thanks to jonatack for providing the list.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 6fe0516858
Tree-SHA512: 61bfdb44dfab9d02b75e5cb06c089a3b1a1fe7134875e1d09166c4116e961d809aa25422fe03f068876e9423b571ecc4a0c7a7eeacba4aac3b2768717f3ee6d6
a02c970eb0 qt, refactor: Revert explicit including QStringBuilder (Hennadii Stepanov)
3fd3a0fc87 qt, build: Optimize string concatenation (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
From [Qt docs](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qstring.html#more-efficient-string-construction):
> ... multiple uses of the \[`QString`\] '+' operator usually means multiple memory allocations. When concatenating n substrings, where n > 2, there can be as many as n - 1 calls to the memory allocator.
With this PR
> ... the '+' will automatically be performed as the `QStringBuilder` '%' everywhere.
The change in the `src/Makefile.qt.include` file does not justify submitting this PR into the main repo, IMHO.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK a02c970eb0
Talkless:
utACK a02c970eb0, built successfully on Debian Sid with Qt 5.15.2, but did not check if any displayed strings are "wrong" after refactoring.
jarolrod:
ACK a02c970eb0
Tree-SHA512: cbb476ee96f27c3bd6e125efab74d8bf24bbdb4c30576b3feea45e203405f3bf5b497dd7d3e11361fc825fcbf4b893b152921a9efdeaf73b42d1865d85f0ae84
e6fe1c37d0 rpc: Improve avoidpartialspends and avoid_reuse documentation (Fabian Jahr)
8f073076b1 wallet: Increase OUTPUT_GROUP_MAX_ENTRIES to 100 (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #17824.
This increases OUTPUT_GROUP_MAX_ENTRIES to 100 which means that OutputGroups will now be up to 100 outputs large, up from previously 10. The main motivation for this change is that during the PR review club on #17824 [several participants signaled](https://bitcoincore.reviews/17824.html#l-339) that 100 might be a better value here.
I think fees should be manageable for users but more importantly, users should know what they can expect when using the wallet with this configuration, so I also tried to clarify the documentation on `-avoidpartialspends` and `avoid_reuse` a bit. If there are other additional ways how or docs where users can be made aware of the potential consequences of using these parameters, please let me know. Another small upside is that [there seem to be a high number of batching transactions with 100 and 200 inputs](https://miro.medium.com/max/3628/1*sZ5eaBSbsJsHx-J9iztq2g.png)([source](https://medium.com/@hasufly/an-analysis-of-batching-in-bitcoin-9bdf81a394e0)) giving these transactions a bit of a larger anonymity set, although that is probably a very weak argument.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK e6fe1c37d0
Xekyo:
retACK e6fe1c37d0
rajarshimaitra:
tACK `e6fe1c3`
achow101:
ACK e6fe1c37d0
glozow:
code review ACK e6fe1c37d0
Tree-SHA512: 79685c58bafa64ed8303b0ecd616fce50fc9a2b758aa79833e4ad9f15760e09ab60c007bc16ab4cbc4222e644cfd154f1fa494b0f3a5d86faede7af33a6f2826
cafef080a2 qt: Refactor to remove unnecessary block in DispatchNotifications (João Barbosa)
57785fb7f6 qt: Early subscribe core signals in transaction table model (João Barbosa)
c6cbdf1a90 qt: Refactor ShowProgress to DispatchNotifications (João Barbosa)
3bccd50ad2 qt: Set flag after inital load on transaction table model (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This fixes the case where transaction notifications arrive between `getWalletTxs` and `subscribeToCoreSignals`. Basically notifications are queued until `getWalletTxs` and wallet rescan complete.
This is also a requirement to call `getWalletTxs` in a background thread.
Motivated by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20241.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
tACK cafef080a2
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK cafef080a2. Only change since last review is splitting commits and replacing m_progress with m_loading.
meshcollider:
Code review ACK cafef080a2
Tree-SHA512: 003caab2f2ae3522619711c8d02d521d2b8f7f280a467f6c3d08abf37ca81cc66b4b9fa10acfdf34e5fe250da7b696cfeec435f72b53c1ea97ccda96d8b4be33
66545da200 Remove support for double serialization (Pieter Wuille)
fff1cae43a Convert uses of double-serialization to {En,De}codeDouble (Pieter Wuille)
afd964d70b Convert existing float encoding tests (Pieter Wuille)
bda33f98e2 Add unit tests for serfloat module (Pieter Wuille)
2be4cd94f4 Add platform-independent float encoder/decoder (Pieter Wuille)
e40224d0c7 Remove unused float serialization (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Based on #21981.
This adds a software-based platform-independent float/double encoder/decoder (platform independent in the sense that it only uses arithmetic and library calls, but never inspects the binary representation). This should strengthen our guarantee that encoded float/double values are portable across platforms. It then removes the functionality to serialize doubles from serialize.h, and replaces its only (non-test) use for fee estimation data serialization with the software encoder.
At least on x86/ARM, the only difference should be how certain NaN values are encoded/decoded (but not *whether* they are NaN or not).
It comes with tests that verify on is_iec559 platforms (which are the only ones we support, at least for now) that the serialized bytes exactly match the binary representation of floats in memory (for non-NaN).
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review re-ACK 66545da200
practicalswift:
cr re-ACK 66545da200
Tree-SHA512: 62ad9adc26e28707b2eb12a919feefd4fd10cf9032652dbb1ca1cc97638ac21de89e240858e80d293d5112685c623e58affa3d316a9783ff0e6d291977a141f5
881a3e2e17 Replace size/weight estimate tuple with struct for named fields (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
For clarity of return values of size estimation functions.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 881a3e2e17
practicalswift:
cr ACK 881a3e2e17
Tree-SHA512: 9aa97e3774fcaf1e5b905259418d827051325c2ad76d6c7388ad7c687c605c024a6c5d2f7e9565f4c180ad1a9f6b179557fcb8b23371ff1a4f3b81300ac1f3d1
When building for Android, _GNU_SOURCE will be defined, but it doesn't
actually have the fopencookie() function, or define the
cookie_io_functions_t type.
For now just skip trying to use it if we are building for Android.
Should fix#22062.
19d51a2907 qt: Avoid unnecessary translations (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Working on translation, I found these translations introduced in #79, that are unnecessary (assuming the universal nature of the "BTC" string).
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 19d51a2907
Tree-SHA512: b45551a54a323c5ba3779f4c1d7c8e7ec4d19a2e95fe70153f48234393bf1449a08e6bd24519ec035ebd4a98080a56af45e7a21546b47152e493b8e1b8f4345e
This change fixes broken Android APK build when the `depends/sources`
directory contains Qt source archives of different versions (e.g., Qt
version update pull request in CI with the cached `depends/sources`
directory).
51a3ac242c Have OutputGroup determine the value to use (Andrew Chow)
6d6d278475 Change SelectCoins_test to actually test SelectCoins (Andrew Chow)
9d3bd74ab4 Remove CreateTransaction while loop and some related variables (Andrew Chow)
6f0d5189af Remove use_bnb and bnb_used (Andrew Chow)
de26eb0e1f Do both BnB and Knapsack coin selection in SelectCoinsMinConf (Andrew Chow)
01dc8ebda5 Have KnapsackSolver actually use effective values (Andrew Chow)
bf26e018de Roll static tx fees into nValueToSelect instead of having it be separate (Andrew Chow)
cc3f14b27c Move output reductions for fee to after coin selection (Andrew Chow)
d97d25d950 Make cost_of_change part of CoinSelectionParams (Andrew Chow)
af5867c896 Move some calculations to common code in SelectCoinsMinConf (Andrew Chow)
1bf4a62cb6 scripted-diff: rename some variables (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Changes `KnapsackSolver` to use effective values instead of just the nominal txout value. Since fees are taken into account during the selection itself, we finally get rid of the `CreateTransaction` loop as well as a few other things that only were only necessary because of that loop.
This should not change coin selection behavior at all (except maybe remove weird edge cases that were caused by the loop). In order to keep behavior the same, `KnapsackSolver` will select outputs with a negative effective value (as it did before).
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 51a3ac242c. Looks good to go!
instagibbs:
review ACK 51a3ac242c
meshcollider:
re-light-utACK 51a3ac242c
Tree-SHA512: 372c27e00edcd5dbf85177421ba88f20bfdaf1791b6e3dc022c44876ecc379403e2375ed69e71c512c49e6af87641001ff385c4b25ab93684b3a08a53bf3824e
4f504f826b rpc: fix code comment for bumpfee/psbtbumpfee output (Jon Atack)
5cb7ac23fb rpc: fix docs for bumpfee psbt update (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #21544 and #20891 for the `bumpfee_helper` used for RPCs bumpfee and psbtbumpfee:
- "psbt" field is only returned in psbtbumpfee and not bumpfee
- bumpfee raises if private keys are disabled, so the txid help "Only returned when wallet private keys are enabled." no longer makes sense; remove it
- add missing space in RPC examples ("Bump the fee, get the new transaction'stxid")
- update txid/psbt code comments
ACKs for top commit:
klementtan:
ACK [`4f504f8`](4f504f826b)
Tree-SHA512: 194faf8af52383eb8ac5cd22825265931bcde135dac79d8ecc4f84f698070da9b9373c00eef8623961881bb293157c7c9a0d71d1bcccf481ae3605a2d1444ed8
a7a43e8fe8 Factor feefilter logic out (amadeuszpawlik)
c0385f10a1 Remove -feefilter option (amadeuszpawlik)
Pull request description:
net: Remove -feefilter option, as it is debug only and isn't used in any tests. Checking this option for every peer on every iteration of the message handler is unnecessary, as described in #21545.
refactor: Move feefilter logic out into a separate `MaybeSendFeefilter(...)` function to improve readability of the already long `SendMessages(...)`. fixes #21545
The configuration option `-feefilter` has been added in 9e072a6e66: _"Implement "feefilter" P2P message"_
According to the [BIP133](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0133.mediawiki), turning the fee filter off was ment for:
> [...] a node [...] using prioritisetransaction to accept transactions whose actual fee rates might fall below the node's mempool min fee [in order to] disable the fee filter to make sure it is exposed to all possible txid's
`-feefilter` was subsequently set as debug only in #8150, with the motivation that the help message was too difficult to translate.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK a7a43e8fe8
promag:
Code review ACK a7a43e8fe8.
MarcoFalke:
review ACK a7a43e8fe8🦁
Tree-SHA512: 8ef9a2f255597c0279d3047dcc968fd30fb7402e981b69206d08eed452c705ed568c24e646e98d06eac118eddd09205b584f45611d1c874abf38f48b08b67630
Only allow "packages" with no conflicts, sorted in order of dependency,
and no more than 25 for now. Note that these groups of transactions
don't necessarily need to adhere to some strict definition of a package
or have any dependency relationships. Clients are free to pass in a
batch of 25 unrelated transactions if they want to.
Maximum number of transactions allowed in a package is 25, equal to the
default mempool descendant limit: if a package has more transactions
than this, either it would fail default mempool descendant limit or the
transactions don't all have a dependency relationship (but then they
shouldn't be in a package together). Same rationale for 101KvB virtual
size package limit.
Note that these policies are only used in test accepts so far.
This allows us to easily create transaction chains for package
validation. We don't test_accept if submit=false because we want to be
able to make transactions that wouldn't pass ATMP (i.e. a child
transaction in a package would fail due to missing inputs).
Only allow test accepts for now. Use the CoinsViewTemporary to keep
track of coins created by each transaction so that subsequent
transactions can spend them. Uncache all coins since we only
ever do test accepts (Note this is different from ATMP which doesn't
uncache for valid test_accepts) to minimize impact on the coins cache.
Require that the input txns have no conflicts and be ordered
topologically. This commit isn't able to detect unsorted packages.
fe3d17df04 net: ignore block-relay-only peers when skipping DNS seed (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Since #17428 bitcoind will attempt to reconnect to two block-relay-only anchors before doing any other outbound connections. When determining whether to use DNS seeds, it will currently see these two peers and decide "we're connected to the p2p network, so no need to lookup DNS" -- but block-relay-only peers don't do address relay, so if your address book is full of invalid addresses (apart from your anchors) this behaviour will prevent you from recovering from that situation.
This patch changes it so that it only skips use of DNS seeds when there are two full-outbound peers, not just block-relay-only peers.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK fe3d17d
amitiuttarwar:
ACK fe3d17df04, this impacts the very common case where we stop/start a node, persisting anchors & have a non-empty addrman (although, to be clear, wouldn't be particularly problematic in the common cases where the addrman has valid addresses)
mzumsande:
ACK fe3d17df04
jonatack:
ACK fe3d17df04
prayank23:
tACK fe3d17df04
Tree-SHA512: 9814b0d84321d7f45b5013eb40c420a0dd93bf9430f5ef12dce50d1912a18d5de2070d890a8c6fe737a3329b31059b823bc660b432d5ba21f02881dc1d951e94
0829516d1f [refactor] Remove unused ForEachNodeThen() template (John Newbery)
09cc66c00e scripted-diff: rename address relay fields (John Newbery)
76568a3351 [net processing] Move addr relay data and logic into net processing (John Newbery)
caba7ae8a5 [net processing] Make RelayAddress() a member function of PeerManagerImpl (John Newbery)
86acc96469 [net processing] Take NodeId instead of CNode* as originator for RelayAddress() (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This continues the work of moving application layer data into net_processing, by moving all addr data into the new Peer object added in #19607.
For motivation, see #19398.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 0829516d1f
mzumsande:
ACK 0829516d1f, reviewed the code and ran tests.
sipa:
utACK 0829516d1f
hebasto:
re-ACK 0829516d1f
Tree-SHA512: efe0410fac288637f203eb37d1999910791e345872d37e1bd5cde50e25bb3cb1c369ab86b3a166ffd5e06ee72e4508aa2c46d658be6a54e20b4f220d2f57d0a6
