fa54efda9b test: pep-8 touched test (MarcoFalke)
fa46768059 test: Remove unused and confusing main parameter from script_util (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa54efda9b
Tree-SHA512: 124e888e16c92bb24ab4d6f68a768d295500a48f8c6c0b4f069493effcd761f80be78dd93b31edbb529ebe4c8aaca764aaff48d1e3b23659dde722981dc787a5
fa189621cc doc: Remove un-actionable TODO from chainparams.cpp (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This can't be fixed by writing code, see discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23021/files#r717426632
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK fa189621cc
prayank23:
ACK fa189621cc
Tree-SHA512: 3c5c0a0f45d057c9a617797007220837d7dcb29ae5996441e41b3698a67dc3d898f465adc0a958ecef430068cd9c564540bb534bbb3b230a53130ea001629f3e
240ea294d5 doc: update doxygen documention of ComputeTimeSmart() and AddToWalletIfInvolvingMe() regarding rescanning_old_block parameter (BitcoinTsunami)
d6eb39af21 test: add functional test to check transaction time determination during block rescanning (BitcoinTsunami)
07b44f16e7 wallet: fix ComputeTimeSmart algorithm to use blocktime during old block rescanning (BitcoinTsunami)
Pull request description:
The function ComputeTimeSmart in wallet.cpp assume that transaction are discovered in the right order.
Moreover the 'smarttime' determination algorithm is coded with realtime scenario in mind and not rescanning of old block.
The functional test demonstrate that if the user import a wallet, then rescan only recent history, and then rescan the entire history, the older transaction discovered would have an incorrect time determination.
In the context of rescanning old block, the only time value that as a meaning is the blocktime.
That's why I've fixed the problem with a simple separation between rescanning of old block and realtime time determination. The fix is written to have no impact on every realtime scenario and only impact the behaviour during a rescanning process.
This PR Fixes#20181.
To be fair, I don't think that this bug could be triggered with the wallet GUI, because it always proceed with a proper rescan.
But RPC API provide the possibility to trigger it. I've discovered it, because Specter desktop v0.10.0 was impacted. (https://github.com/cryptoadvance/specter-desktop/issues/680).
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 240ea294d5 per `git diff b92d552 240ea29`, re-verified rebase to latest master + debug build clean + new test passes on the branch and fails on master, only change since my review a few hours ago is incorporation of latest review suggestions
meshcollider:
re-utACK 240ea294d5
Tree-SHA512: 514b02e41d011ddfa325f5e8080b93800e1ea4ed5853fa420670a6ac700e8b463000dbea65f8ced8565cfb950c7f51b69154034dcb111e67aca3b964a0061494
ea31caf6b4 update estimatesmartfee rpc to return max of estimateSmartFee, mempoolMinFee and minRelayTxFee. (pranabp-bit)
Pull request description:
This PR is in response to the issue [#19699](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19699).
Based on the discussion in the comments of PR [#22673](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22673) changes have been made in the `estimatesmartfee` itself such that it takes into account `mempoolMinFee` and `relayMinFee` . Hence it provides a fee estimate that is most likely to be paid by the user in an actual transaction, preventing issues such as [#16072](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16072).
The test file test/functional/feature_fee_estimation.py has also been updated to check this functionality.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
re-utACK ea31caf6b4
Tree-SHA512: 8f36153a07cbd552c5c13d11d9c6e987a7a555ea4cc83f2573c0c92dd97c706d90c30a7248671437c2f3a836d3272f8fad53d15a5fa6efaa0409ae8009b0a18d
43cd6b8af9 doc: add release notes for removal of the -deprecatedrpc=addresses flag (Michael Dietz)
2b1fdc2c6c refactor: minor styling, prefer snake case and same line if (Michael Dietz)
d64deac7b8 refactor: share logic between ScriptPubKeyToUniv and ScriptToUniv (Michael Dietz)
8721638daa rpc: remove deprecated addresses and reqSigs from rpc outputs (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
Resolves#21797 now that we've branched-off to v23 ("addresses" and "reqSigs" deprecated) "ExtractDestinations" should be removed.
`-deprecatedrpc=addresses` was initially added in this PR #20286 (which resolved the original issue #20102).
Some chunks of code and logic are no longer used/necessary with the removal of this, and therefore some minor refactoring is done in this PR as well (separated commits)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 43cd6b8af9🐉
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 43cd6b8af9
jonatack:
ACK 43cd6b8af9 per `git range-diff a9d0cec 92dc5e9 43cd6b8`, also rebased to latest master, debug built + quick re-review of each commit to bring back context, and ran tests locally at the final commit
Tree-SHA512: fba83495e396d3c06f0dcf49292f14f4aa6b68fa758f0503941fade1a6e7271cda8378e2734af1faea550d1b43c85a36c52ebcc9dec0732936f9233b4b97901c
03a5fe06bd qt: Keep InitExecutor in main gui thread (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
The `InitExecutor` constructor moves the instance to a dedicated thread. This PR changes that by using `GUIUtil::ObjectInvoke` to run the relevant code in that thread.
A possible follow-up is to ditch the dedicated thread and use `QThreadPool` or even `QtConcurrent::run` (if we want to enable that).
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 03a5fe06bd, tested on Linux Mint 20.2 (Qt 5.12.8).
jarolrod:
ACK 03a5fe06bd
Tree-SHA512: 8b40300371d4c04efb9913600a06ba4899af0b5f50fdb26ea23ec751df6d3bd52f8bd693a5e8f6a94ebf3790583dc96c6070e6878d247dece62347aa9bd99031
b8909b0746 Run functional tests with all possible flags (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
Functional tests which use flags like `--descriptors` or `--legacy-wallet` won't run if only the base script is given to `test_runner.py` because it doesn't match any script in the list exactly. It would be easier if it would just run both options.
For example, instead of:
```
test_runner.py 'wallet_basic.py --legacy-wallet' 'wallet_basic.py --descriptors'
```
We can now just run:
```
test_runner.py wallet_basic
```
Also useful for `--usecli`, the IPv4/IPv6/nonloopback `rpc_bind.py` variations, etc.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK b8909b0746
MarcoFalke:
review ACK b8909b0746
Tree-SHA512: d367037cb170e705551726d47fe4569ebc3ceadece280dd3edbb3ecb41e19f3263d6d272b407316ed6011164e850df4321fb340b1b183b34497c9f7cc439f4d8
This will provide better estimates which would be closer to fee paid in actual
transactions.
The test has also been changed such that when the node is restarted with a
high mempoolMinFee, the estimatesmartfee still returns a feeRate greater
than or equal to the mempoolMinFee, minRelayTxFee.(just like the feeRate of actual transactions)
fa8f3ba131 test: pep-8 (MarcoFalke)
fac5708afc test: Use assert_equal over assert for easier debugging (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
See #23116
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Light code review ACK fa8f3ba131
hebasto:
ACK fa8f3ba131, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
theStack:
Code-review ACK fa8f3ba131
Tree-SHA512: bfdb91fd72144f05c38ed9aa8e40e17f59dcb90ac164b8bd01e241296a6c91a01f79a95a5eb97cc8445fdabe8605ef5b8062219a683613627c776feb7433a460
7e3ee4cdd0 GUI: Ask user to unlock wallet before signing psbt (Samuel Dobson)
0f3acecf33 Add test that walletprocesspsbt requires unlocked wallet when signing (Samuel Dobson)
0e895212bb Ensure wallet is unlocked before signing in walletprocesspsbt (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
If signing a PSBT, we need to ensure the wallet is unlocked.
Fixes#22874, fixesbitcoin-core/gui#312
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 7e3ee4cdd0
lsilva01:
Code Review ACK 7e3ee4cdd0
benthecarman:
ACK 7e3ee4cdd0
Tree-SHA512: 6726a873582747900ab454ea21153a92be86808a4c1517dc2856b389876a2da9e8df1ffa9b567b6bd017038342c3544ecf5ca3c97744e7debe0a5ee65563687d
efcaefc7b5 test: Add remaining scenarios of 0 waste (rajarshimaitra)
Pull request description:
As per the [review club](https://bitcoincore.reviews/22009) discussion on #22009 , it was observed that there were other two fee scenarios in which selection waste could be zero.
These are:
- (LTF - Fee) == Change Cost
- (LTF - Fee) == Excess
Even though these are obvious by the definition of waste metric, adding tests for them can be helpful in explaining its behavior
to new readers of the code base, along with pinning the behavior for future.
This PR adds those two cases to waste calculation unit test.
Also let me know if I am missing more scenarios.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Tested re-ACK efcaefc7b5
achow101:
ACK efcaefc7b5
meshcollider:
ACK efcaefc7b5
Tree-SHA512: 13fe3e2c0ea7bb58d34e16c32908b84705130dec16382ff941e5e60ca5b379f9c5811b33f36c4c72d7a98cfbb6af2f196d0a69e96989afa4b9e49893eaadd7cb
182de7ba10 ci: update minimum compiler requirements for std::filesystem (fanquake)
04f5bafb7b doc: update minimum compiler requirements for std::filesystem (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This increases the minimum required compiler versions to Clang 7 and GCC 8.1. This has been split out of #20744 (migration to `std::filesystem`), as it's also a requirement for some other changes, such as #20452 or #20457 which want to make use of `std::from_chars`. As well as #20435, which is also `std::filesystem` related. Given that the `std::filesystem` changes are moving ahead, splitting out this change to let other PRs take advantage of the new requirements seems worthwhile.
Clang 7 has been available in Debian since [Stretch (oldoldstable)](https://packages.debian.org/stretch/clang-7) and in Ubuntu since [Bionic (18.04)](https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic-updates/clang-7). GCC 8 has been available in Debian since [Buster (oldstable)](https://packages.debian.org/buster/gcc) and in Ubuntu since [Bionic (18.04)](https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/gcc-8). CentOS 8 also packages GCC 8.
The CI changes here give us one build with GCC 8, and another using Clang 7 on top of libc++.
Note that the minimum required libc++ in dependencies.md is unchanged as, at least for `<filesystem>`, and the `*_chars` use cases, libc++ 7 [should be sufficient](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/compiler_support/17).
I've tested that building `<filesystem>` code using Clang 7 & libc++ works. i.e `clang++-7 -std=c++17 fs.cpp -stdlib=libc++ -lc++fs`. Also that building `<filesystem>` code with Clang 7 and libstdc++ 8 works. i.e `clang++-7 -std=c++17 fs.cpp -lstdc++fs`.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 182de7ba10
Tree-SHA512: 5bc151c4be58005711eed6bd8a091f3417f75a0218c11c08cffff9d749edadd965726bb7856a8e693e96e69ed0596989cda1aac4b29fb6d30705b1687a5b3363
d96b000e94 Make GUI UTXO lock/unlock persistent (Samuel Dobson)
077154fe69 Add release note for lockunspent change (Samuel Dobson)
719ae927dc Update lockunspent tests for lock persistence (Samuel Dobson)
f13fc16295 Allow lockunspent to store the lock in the wallet DB (Samuel Dobson)
c52789365e Allow locked UTXOs to be store in the wallet database (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
Addresses and closes#22368
As per that issue (and its predecessor #14907), there seems to be some interest in allowing unspent outputs to be locked persistently. This PR does so by adding a flag to lockunspent to store the change in the wallet database. Defaults to false, so there is no change in default behaviour.
Edit: GUI commit changes default behaviour. UTXOs locked/unlocked via the GUI are now persistent.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d96b000e94
kristapsk:
ACK d96b000e94
lsilva01:
Tested ACK d96b000e94 on Ubuntu 20.04
prayank23:
ACK d96b000e94
Tree-SHA512: 957a5bbfe7f763036796906ccb1598feb6c14c5975838be1ba24a198840bf59e83233165cb112cebae909b6b25bf27275a4d7fa425923ef6c788ff671d7a89a8
097ac74fd2 ci: Add more functional tests to the native Windows task (Hennadii Stepanov)
8e08a4b6ce ci: Increase the dynamic port range to the maximum on native Windows (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Fixes#18548.
The solution suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18548#issuecomment-923944390.
Also more functional tests added to the native Windows task.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
concept ACK 097ac74fd2
Tree-SHA512: 51f3cb5b4e707dd2e4fd6b3be7e3b9615ec4a2760f4e0de9312443edadedf148e94964c43352fd2c8f6842a2baf70084b559760e7b46fc654ea882b0bba21443
fa04f26aa7 test: Avoid race after connect_nodes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Wait until the connection is fully established on both sides (verack). Fixes#22714
ACKs for top commit:
kiminuo:
utACK fa04f26aa7
Tree-SHA512: bc2c44b44b688086ff84046924cf5251dd625584e93ce8fa17de27023855b32f3bb55109b846abbcec775e2836c7f3c5a81d6b4aff7c4ac065b9aefa044c1883
e148a52332 bench: fixed ubsan implicit conversion (Martin Ankerl)
da4e2f1da0 bench: various args improvements (Jon Atack)
d312fd94a1 bench: clean up includes (Jon Atack)
1f10f1663e bench: add usage description and documentation (Martin Ankerl)
d3c6f8bfa1 bench: introduce -min_time argument (Martin Ankerl)
9fef832932 bench: make EvictionProtection.* work with any number of iterations (Martin Ankerl)
153e6860e8 bench: change AddrManGood to AddrManAddThenGood (Martin Ankerl)
468b232f71 bench: remove unnecessary & incorrect multiplication in MuHashDiv (Martin Ankerl)
eed99cf272 bench: update nanobench from 4.3.4 to 4.3.6 (Martin Ankerl)
Pull request description:
This PR updates the nanobench with the latest release from upstream, v4.3.6. It fixes the missing performance counters.
Due to discussions on #22999 I have done some work that should make the benchmark results more reliable. It introduces a new flag `-min_time` that allows to run a benchmark for much longer then the default. When results are unreliable, choosing a large timeframe here should usually get repeatable results even when frequency scaling cannot be disabled. The default is now 10ms. For this to work I have changed the `AddrManGood` and `EvictionProtection` benchmarks so they work with any number of iterations.
Also, this adds more usage documentation to `bench_bitcoin -h` and I've cherry-picked two changes from #22999 authored by Jon Atack
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK e148a52332
laanwj:
Code review ACK e148a52332
Tree-SHA512: 2da6de19a5c85ac234b190025e195c727546166dbb75e3f9267e667a73677ba1e29b7765877418a42b1407b65df901e0130763936525e6f1450f18f08837c40c
fa4db8671b test: Activate all regtest softforks at height 1, unless overridden (MarcoFalke)
faad1e5ffd Introduce -testactivationheight=name@height setting (MarcoFalke)
fadb2ef2fa test: Add extra_args argument to TestChain100Setup constructor (MarcoFalke)
faa46986aa test: Remove version argument from build_next_block in p2p_segwit test (MarcoFalke)
fa086ef539 test: Remove unused ~TestChain100Setup (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
All softforks that are active at the tip of mainnet, should also be active from genesis in regtest. Otherwise their rules might not be enforced in user testing, thus making their testing less useful.
To still allow tests to check pre-softfork rules, a runtime argument can change the activation height.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa4db8671b
theStack:
re-ACK fa4db8671b
Tree-SHA512: 6397d46ff56ebc48c007a4cda633904d6ac085bc76b4ecf83097c546c7eec93ac0c44b88083b2611b9091c8d1fb8ee1e314065de078ef15e922c015de7ade8bf
There are two more cases where waste can be 0, when:
- (Fee - LTF) == -Change Cost
- (Fee - LTF) == -Excess
Adding these two conditions explicitly in the unit test will help
pin the behavior, also demonstrate waste calculation scenarios to new
readers.
673a5bd337 test: validation: add unittest for UpdateTip behavior (James O'Beirne)
2705570109 test: refactor: separate CreateBlock in TestChain100Setup (James O'Beirne)
298bf5d563 test: refactor: declare NoMalleation const auto (James O'Beirne)
071200993f move-only: unittest: add test/util/chainstate.h (James O'Beirne)
8f5710fd0a validation: fix CheckBlockIndex for multiple chainstates (James O'Beirne)
5a807736da validation: insert assumed-valid block index entries into candidates (James O'Beirne)
01a9b8fe71 validation: set BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID during snapshot load (James O'Beirne)
42b2520db9 chain: add BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID for use with assumeutxo (James O'Beirne)
b217020df7 validation: change UpdateTip for multiple chainstates (James O'Beirne)
665072a36d doc: add comment for g_best_block (James O'Beirne)
ac4051d891 refactor: remove unused assumeutxo methods (James O'Beirne)
9f6bb53935 validation: add chainman ref to CChainState (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11) (parent PR: #15606)
---
Modify UpdateTip and CheckBlockIndex for use with multiple chainstates. Includes a new unittest verifying `g_best_block` behavior (previously untested at the unit level) and various changes necessary for running and testing `ProcessNewBlock()`-like behavior on the background validation chainstate.
This changeset introduces a new block index `nStatus` flag called `BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID`, and it is applied to block index entries that are beneath the UTXO snapshot base block upon snapshot load. Once each block is validated (during async background validation), the flag is removed. This allows us to avoid (ab)using `BLOCK_VALID_*` flags for snapshot chain block entries, and preserves the original meaning of those flags.
Note: this PR previously incorporated changes to `LoadBlockIndex()` and `RewindBlockIndex()` as noted in Russ' comments below, but once I generated the changes necessary to test the UpdateTip change, I decided to split this changes out into another PR due to the size of this one.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 673a5bd337
jonatack:
Code-review re-ACK 673a5bd337 reviewed diff, rebased to master/debug build/ran unit+functional tests
naumenkogs:
ACK 673a5bd337
fjahr:
Code review ACK 673a5bd337
ariard:
utACK 673a5bd3
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 673a5bd337. Just linker fix and split commit changes mentioned https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21526#issuecomment-921064563 since last review
benthecarman:
ACK 673a5bd337
Tree-SHA512: 0a6dc23d041b27ed9fd0ee1f3e5971b92fb1d2df2fc9b655d5dc48594235321ab1798d06de2ec55482ac3966a9ed56de8d56e9e29cae75bbe8690bafc2dda383
64e1ddd255 log: call LogPrint only once with time data samples (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
When timedata samples are logged, `LogPrint()` is currently invoked multiple times on the same log entry.
This can lead to chaos in the log when other threads log concurrently, as in this example which motivated this PR:
```
2021-09-20T00:28:57Z -48 -26 -11 -8 -6 Addrman checks started: new 37053, tried 83, total 37136
2021-09-20T00:28:57Z -3 -1 -1 -1 -1 +0 | nTimeOffset = -3 (+0 minutes)
```
Fix this by building the log message in a string and logging it one `LogPrint()` call. I also changed the wording slightly so that it becomes understandable what is being logged, example:
```
2021-09-21T21:03:24Z time data samples: -43 -18 -12 -4 -1 -1 +0 +0 +268 | median offset = -1 (+0 minutes)
```
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Tested ACK 64e1ddd255
laanwj:
Tested ACK 64e1ddd255, new message lgtm
Tree-SHA512: ffb7a93166cc8fd6a39200b9e03a9d1e8e975b7ded822ccddd015f553258b991162a5cb867501f426d3ebcfef4f32f0e06e17b18e6b01486b967595d102f8379
ab27800799 log: Remove unnecessary timing logs for Callbacks bench (Douglas Chimento)
Pull request description:
Logging of Callbacks are no longer needed and records times that are not relevant for performance analysis.
resolves#23071
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Thanks. re-ACK ab27800799
jonatack:
Code review ACK ab27800799
Tree-SHA512: be1ea780c4db9407a8799065a8824b9d3610abac72af5907809ed62d493d5a54e65735de45ec5fdd0edb85ef21ec6036105abe8ca00093942980f6f92e7fec50
f2747d1602 build: Restrict check for CRC32C intrinsic to aarch64 (W. J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
`crc32c`'s hardware accelerated code doesn't handle ARM 32-bit at all, but only 64-bit. Make the check in `configure.ac` check for this architecture explicitly. This change does not affect non-ARM architectures.
For the release binaries, the current `configure.ac` check happens to work: it enables it on aarch64 but disables it for armhf. However some combination of compiler version and settings can cause this check to succeed on armhf (as reported on IRC). So make the 64-bit platform requirement explicit.
(details: while the check already explicitly checks the `__crc32d` intrinsic, which strictly doesn't exist on 32-bit ARM, this is not enough! gcc happens to helpfully emulate it:
> These built-in intrinsics for the ARMv8-A CRC32 extension are available when the -march=armv8-a+crc switch is used "uint32_t __crc32d (uint32_t, uint64_t)" Form of expected instruction(s): Two crc32w r0, r0, r0 instructions for AArch32
)
ACKs for top commit:
luke-jr:
re-tACK f2747d1602
jarolrod:
ACK f2747d1602
Tree-SHA512: e5f05f05eeec310ac42685621d86862735586be66dc378db404ec9414ac5aaea7c53d76d76d875b15b11924eee6714076120c07b077183fd7af898704fd81823
