5a0688a20d test: enable reindex readonly test on *BSD and macOS as root (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27850#discussion_r1349505585
OpenBSD and FreeBSD don't have `chattr` but they do have `chflags`, use that method to make the block file immutable for the reindex_readonly test.
Written and tested on a VPS running FreeBSD:
```
FreeBSD freebsd-13-1 13.2-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 13.2-RELEASE-p4 GENERIC amd64
```
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
re-cr-lgtm-ACK 5a0688a20d
jonatack:
ACK 5a0688a20d tested on macOS only
theStack:
ACK 5a0688a20d
Tree-SHA512: 8c88d282d09c00355d22c4c504b779f60e420327a5e07bcf80fa77b97fefcb04952af9ceaf439d9033a0a2448cb26a02663fe6bddcd4a74792857cfbaf1c5162
4814e4063e test: Check tx metadata is migrated to watchonly (Andrew Chow)
d616d30ea5 wallet: Reload watchonly and solvables wallets after migration (Andrew Chow)
118f2d7d70 wallet: Copy all tx metadata to watchonly wallet (Andrew Chow)
9af87cf348 test: Check that a failed wallet migration is cleaned up (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Some incomplete/incorrect state as a result of migration can be mitigated/cleaned up by simply restarting the migrated wallets. We already do this for a wallet when it is migrated, but we do not for the new watchonly and solvables wallets that may be created. This PR introduces this behavior, in addition to creating those wallets initially without an attached chain.
While implementing this, I noticed that not all `CWalletTx` metadata was being copied over to the watchonly wallet and so some data, such as time received, was being lost. This PR fixes this as a side effect of not having a chain attached to the watchonly wallet. A test has also been added.
ACKs for top commit:
ishaanam:
light code review ACK 4814e4063e
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 4814e4063e. Just implemented the suggested orderpos, copyfrom, and path set comments since last review
furszy:
ACK 4814e406
Tree-SHA512: 0b992430df9f452cb252c2212df8e876613f43564fcd1dc00c6c31fa497adb84dfff6b5ef597590f9b288c5f64cb455f108fcc9b6c9d1fe9eb2c39e7f2c12a89
The legacy serialization was vulnerable to maleation and is fixed by
adopting the same serialization procedure as was already in use for
MuHash.
This also includes necessary test fixes where the hash_serialized2 was
hardcoded as well as correction of the regtest chainparams.
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Falbesoner <sebastian.falbesoner@gmail.com>
When migrating, create the watchonly and solvables wallets without a
context. Then unload and reload them after migration completes, as we do
for the actual wallet.
There is also additional handling for a failed reload.
004903ebad test: Add Wallet Unlock Context Manager (Brandon Odiwuor)
Pull request description:
Fixes#28601, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28403#discussion_r1325426430
Add Context Manager to manage the locking and unlocking of locked wallets with a passphrase during testing.
ACKs for top commit:
kevkevinpal:
lgtm ACK [004903e](004903ebad)
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 004903ebad
Tree-SHA512: ab234c167e71531df0d974ff9a31d444f7ce2a1d05aba5ea868cc9452f139845eeb24ca058d88f058bc02482b762adf2d99e63a6640b872cc71a57a0068abfe8
fa4c6836c9 test: Fix failing time check in rpc_net.py (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This check fails on slow runners, such as s390x qemu.
Fix it by using mocktime.
See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28523#discussion_r1357980527
ACKs for top commit:
0xB10C:
ACK fa4c6836c9
pinheadmz:
ACK fa4c6836c9
brunoerg:
crACK fa4c6836c9
Tree-SHA512: 83fb534682e11e97537dc89de8c16f206f38af1a892a2d5970c02684c05eaea8fc9adba3159f16b2440ca0b3871d513a0562a6f3a38f19a5574a47be0919e42f
621db2f004 test: assumeutxo file with unknown block hash (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Takes care of one of the open Todos in the assumeutxo functional test. Since an unknown block could be any hash, I simply chose one placeholder, it could also be a random string though.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 621db2f004
pablomartin4btc:
cr ACK 621db2f004
theStack:
ACK 621db2f004
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 621db2f004
Tree-SHA512: ee0438ce619f7348c6f88e39b0ea7ddddb8832956d9034ecc795c6033d5d905c09d11b7d0d5afc38231b2fd091ea7c1bd0a0be99d9c32c4e6357a25d76294142
9620cb4493 assumeutxo: fail early if snapshot block hash doesn't match AssumeUTXO parameters (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Right now the `loadtxoutset` RPC call treats literally all files with a minimum size of 40 bytes (=size of metadata) as potential valid snapshot candidates and the waiting loop for seeing the metadata block hash in the headers chain is always entered, e.g.:
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli loadtxoutset ~/.vimrc
<wait>
bitcoind log:
...
2023-10-15T14:55:45Z [snapshot] waiting to see blockheader 626174207465730a7265626d756e207465730a656c62616e65207861746e7973 in headers chain before snapshot activation
...
```
There is no point in doing any further action though if we already know from the start that the UTXO snapshot loading won't be successful. This PR adds an assumeutxo parameter check immediately after the metadata is read in, so we can fail immediately on a mismatch:
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli loadtxoutset ~/.vimrc
error code: -32603
error message:
Unable to load UTXO snapshot, assumeutxo block hash in snapshot metadata not recognized (626174207465730a7265626d756e207465730a656c62616e
65207861746e7973)
```
This way, users who mistakenly try to load files that are not snapshots don't have to wait 10 minutes (=the block header waiting timeout) anymore to get a negative response. If a file is loaded which is a valid snapshot (referencing to an existing block hash), but one which doesn't match the parameters, the feedback is also faster, as we don't have to wait anymore to see the hash in the headers chain before getting an error.
This is also partially fixes#28621.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 9620cb4493
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9620cb4493. This should fix an annoyance and bad UX.
pablomartin4btc:
tACK 9620cb4493
Tree-SHA512: f88b865e9d46254858e57c024463f389cd9d8760a7cb30c190aa1723a931e159987dfc2263a733825d700fa612e7416691e4d8aab64058f1aeb0a7fa9233ac9c
Two recently added tests (PR #28625 / commit 2e31250027
and PR #28634 / commit 3bb51c29df)
introduced a bug by wrongly using the `assert_debug_log` helper.
Instead of passing the expected debug string in a list as expected, it
was passed as bare string, which is then interpretered as a list of
characters, very likely leading the debug log assertion pass even if the
intended message is not appearing.
In order to avoid bugs like this in the future, enforce that the
`{un}expected_msgs` parameters are lists.
4077e43bf6 test: fix usdt undeclared function errors on mantis (willcl-ark)
Pull request description:
This is one way to fix#28600
Recently usage of undeclared functions became an error rather than a warning, in C2x. https://reviews.llvm.org/D122983?id=420290
This change has migrated into the build tools of Ubuntu 23.10 which now causes the USDT tests to fail to compile, see
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28600
I think there are various potential fixes:
1. Manually declare the functions we use
2. Fix imports so that manual declarations aren't needed
3. Revert the new C2X behaviour and don't error on implicit function declarations
I would have preferred solution 2, but I believe this will require changes to the upstream bcc package. Having played with the imports I can get things working in a standalone C program, using system headers, but when building the program from a python context as we do in the test it uses its own headers (bundled with the python lib) rather than the system ones, and manually importing (some) system headers results in definition mismatches. I also investigated explicitly importing required headers from the package, which use paths like `#import </virtual/bcc/bcc_helpers.h>`, but this seems more obtuse and brittle than simply ignoring the warning.
Therefore I think that until the upstream python pacakge fixes their declarations, we should fix this by setting `-Wno-error=implicit-function-declaration` for the tracing programs.
cc maflcko 0xB10C
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 4077e43bf6
Tree-SHA512: 8368bb1155e920a95db128dc893267f8dab64f1ae53f6d63c6d9294e2e4e92bef8515e3697e9113228bedc51c0afdbc5bbcf558c119bf0eb3293dc2ced86b435
850670e3d6 test: don't run old binaries under valgrind (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Some, but not all, backward compatibility tests fail for me and it seems useless to run old release binaries under valgrind anyway.
Can be tested by running `test/functional/feature_txindex_compatibility.py --valgrind --timeout-factor=10` with and without this PR.
—
The previous version of this PR disabled these test entirely under valgrind. The current version does run the test, but starts the old binaries without valgrind.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 850670e3d6
Tree-SHA512: ebdf461083f1292528e6619963b910f486b60b4f6b183f0aea2c8bfcafa98caeb204d138700cd288450643bcec5e49e12b89f2f7537fccdf495a2a33acd9cea0
3bb51c29df test: BIP324: add check for missing garbage terminator detection (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the "missing garbage terminator" detection on incoming v2 transport (BIP324) connections:
04265ba937/src/net.cpp (L1205-L1209)
Note that this always happens at the same exact amount of bytes sent in (after 64 + 4095 + 16 = 4175 bytes), if at no point, the last 16 bytes of potential authentication data match the garbage, i.e. all the previous bytes after the ellswift pubkey. To keep it simple, we just send in zero-value bytes here and verify that the detection hits exactly after the last bytes is sent.
AFAICT, with this PR all the v2 transport errors that can be triggered in this simple way of "just open a socket and send in a fixed byte-string" are covered. For more advanced test, we need BIP324 cryptography in the test framework in order to perform a v2 handshake etc. (PRs #28374, #24748).
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 3bb51c29df
laanwj:
ACK 3bb51c29df
Tree-SHA512: f88275061c7c377a3d9f2608452671afc26deb6d5bd5be596de987c7e5042555153ffe681760c33bce2b921ae04e50f349ea0128a677e6443a95a079e52cdc5f
This is unnecessary and caused test failures. The backward
compatibility tests are meant to find regressions in the
current codebase, not to detect bugs in older releases.
2e31250027 test: check that loading snapshot not matching AssumeUTXO parameters fails (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the failed loading of an AssumeUTXO snapshot in case the referenced block hash doesn't match the parameters in the chainparams. Right now, I expect this would be the most common error-case for `loadtxoutset` out in the wild, as for mainnet the `m_assumeutxo_data` map is empty and this error condition would obviously always be triggered for any (otherwise valid, correctly encoded) snapshot. Note that this test-case is the simplest scenario and doesn't cover any of the TODO ideas mentioned at the top of the functional test yet.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK 2e31250027
Sjors:
utACK 2e31250027
achow101:
ACK 2e31250027
Tree-SHA512: 8bcb2d525c95fbc95f87d3e978ad717d95bddb1ff67cbe7d3b06e4783f0f1ffba32b17ef451468c39c23bc1b3ef1150baa71148c145275c386f2d4822d790d39
bfa0bd632a test: Use pathlib over os.path #28362 (ns-xvrn)
Pull request description:
In reference to issue #28362 refactoring of functional tests to use pathlib over os.path to reduce verbosity and increase the intuitiveness of managing file access.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
re-ACK bfa0bd632a🐨
willcl-ark:
ACK bfa0bd632a
Tree-SHA512: fb0833c4039d09758796514e47567a93ac831cb0776ff1a7ed8299792ad132e83282ef80bea098a88ae1551d906f2a56093d3e8de240412f9080735d00d496d9
74c77825e5 test: Unit test for inferring scripts with hybrid and uncompressed keys (Andrew Chow)
f895f97014 test: Scripts with hybrid pubkeys are migrated to watchonly (Andrew Chow)
37b9b73477 descriptors: Move InferScript's pubkey validity checks to InferPubkey (Andrew Chow)
b7485f11ab descriptors: Check result of InferPubkey (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`InferDescriptor` was not always checking that the pubkey it was placing into the descriptor was an allowed pubkey. For example, given a P2WPKH script that uses an uncompressed pubkey, it would produce a `wpkh()` with the uncompressed key. Additionally, the hybrid key check was only being done for `pk()` scripts, where it should've been done for all scripts.
This PR moves the key checking into `InferPubkey`. If the key is not valid for the context, then `nullptr` is returned and the inferring will fall through to the defaults of either `raw()` or `addr()`.
This also resolves an issue with migrating legacy wallets that contain hybrid pubkeys as such watchonly scripts will become `raw()` or `addr()` and go to the watchonly wallet. Note that a legacy wallet cannot sign for hybrid pubkeys. A test has been added for the migration case.
Also added unit tests for `InferDescriptor` itself as the edge cases with that function are not covered by the descriptor roundtrip test.
ACKs for top commit:
furszy:
ACK 74c77825
Sjors:
utACK 74c77825e5
Tree-SHA512: ed5f63e42a2e46120245a6b0288b90d2a6912860814c6c08fe393332add1cb364dc5eca72f16980352143570aef0c07bf1a91acd294099463bd028b6ce2fe40c
Recently usage of undeclared functions became an error rather than a
warning, in C2x. https://reviews.llvm.org/D122983?id=420290
This change has migrated into the build tools of Ubuntu 23.10 which now
causes the USDT tests to fail to compile, see
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28600
Fix this by setting `-Wno-error=implicit-function-declaration` for the
tracing programs.
05af4dfa50 test: Use feerate higher than minrelay fee in wallet_fundraw (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The external input weight test in wallet_fundrawtransaction.py made transactions at the minimum relay fee. However due to ECDSA sometimes making a shorter signature than expected, the size estimate (and therefore the funded fee) ends up being a little bit too low, which results in the final transaction being under the min relay fee. We can compensate for this by just using a feerate higher than the minrelayfee as the actual feerate itself does not matter in this test.
Fixes#28437
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
utACK 05af4dfa50, seems right to me
Tree-SHA512: 3e08f052db32d891515d32b27b2d7c5bcbfc77d5ea457eefc75e8aa6d40960278e537c1e8bffe7ddc211949c78e14145a671a8d34e7e1bb15438773cb0d9e89d
This makes it more generalistic than just having the miniscripts since
we are going to have Taproot descriptors with (multiple) miniscripts in
them too.
- Remove usage of the internal wait_until_helper function
- Use framework self.no_op instead of new no_sync function
co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <github@achow101.com>
0f83ab407e test: display abrupt shutdown errors in console output (furszy)
Pull request description:
Making it easier to debug errors in the CI environment,
particularly in scenarios where it's not immediately clear
what happened nor which node crashed (or shutdown abruptly).
A bit of context:
Currently, the test framework redirects each node's stderr output
stream to a different temporary file inside each node's data directory.
While this is sufficient for storing the error, it isn't very helpful for
understanding what happened just by reading the CI console output.
Most of the time, reading the stderr file in the CI environment is not
possible, because people don't have access to it.
Testing Note:
The displayed error difference can be observed by cherry-picking this
commit 9cc5393c0f on top of this branch and running any
functional test.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 0f83ab407e
theStack:
ACK 0f83ab407e
Tree-SHA512: 83ce4d21d5316e8cb16a17d3fbe77b8649fced9e09410861d9674c233f6e9c34bcf573504e387e4f439c2841b2ee9855d0d35607fa13aa89eafe0080c45ee82d
The external input weight test in wallet_fundrawtransaction.py made
transactions at the minimum relay fee. However due to ECDSA sometimes
making a shorter signature than expected, the size estimate (and
therefore the funded fee) ends up being a little bit too low, which
results in the final transaction being under the min relay fee. We can
compensate for this by just using a feerate higher than the minrelayfee
as the actual feerate itself does not matter in this test.
5b878be742 [doc] add release note for submitpackage (glozow)
7a9bb2a2a5 [rpc] allow submitpackage to be called outside of regtest (glozow)
5b9087a9a7 [rpc] require package to be a tree in submitpackage (glozow)
e32ba1599c [txpackages] IsChildWithParentsTree() (glozow)
b4f28cc345 [doc] parent pay for child in aggregate CheckFeeRate (glozow)
Pull request description:
Permit (restricted topology) submitpackage RPC outside of regtest. Suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26933#issuecomment-1510851570
This RPC should be safe but still experimental - interface may change, not all features (e.g. package RBF) are implemented, etc. If a miner wants to expose this to people, they can effectively use "package relay" before the p2p changes are implemented. However, please note **this is not package relay**; transactions submitted this way will not relay to other nodes if the feerates are below their mempool min fee. Users should put this behind some kind of rate limit or permissions.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 5b878be742
achow101:
ACK 5b878be742
dergoegge:
Code review ACK 5b878be742
ajtowns:
ACK 5b878be742
ariard:
Code Review ACK 5b878be742. Though didn’t manually test the PR.
Tree-SHA512: 610365c0b2ffcccd55dedd1151879c82de1027e3319712bcb11d54f2467afaae4d05dca5f4b25f03354c80845fef538d3938b958174dda8b14c10670537a6524
fa071aeb61 wallet: No BDB creation, unless -deprecatedrpc=create_bdb (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
With BDB being removed soon, it seems confusing and harmful to allow users to create fresh BDB wallets going forward, as it would load them with an additional burden of having to migrate them soon after.
Also, it would be good to allow for one release for test (and external) scripts to adapt.
Fix all issues by introducing the `-deprecatedrpc=create_bdb` setting.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK fa071aeb61
achow101:
ACK fa071aeb61
furszy:
utACK fa071aeb
Tree-SHA512: 37a4c3e4ba659e0ebe2382e71d9c80e42a895d9ad743f5dda7c110fbbb7d2a36f46769982552a9ac0c3a57203379ef164be97aa8033eb7674d6b4da030ba8f9b
a9ef702a87 assumeutxo: change getchainstates RPC to return a list of chainstates (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Current `getchainstates` RPC returns "normal" and "snapshot" fields which are not ideal because it requires new "normal" and "snapshot" terms to be defined, and the definitions are not really consistent with internal code. (In the RPC interface, the "snapshot" chainstate becomes the "normal" chainstate after it is validated, while in internal code there is no "normal chainstate" and the "snapshot chainstate" is still called that temporarily after it is validated).
The current `getchainstates` RPC is also awkward to use if you to want information about the most-work chainstate, because you have to look at the "snapshot" field if it exists, and otherwise fall back to the "normal" field.
Fix these issues by having `getchainstates` just return a flat list of chainstates ordered by work, and adding a new chainstate "validated" field alongside the existing "snapshot_blockhash" field so it is explicit if a chainstate was originally loaded from a snapshot, and whether the snapshot has been validated.
This change was motivated by comment thread in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28562#discussion_r1344154808
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-ACK a9ef702a87
jamesob:
re-ACK a9ef702
achow101:
ACK a9ef702a87
Tree-SHA512: b364e2e96675fb7beaaee60c4dff4b69e6bc2d8a30dea1ba094265633d1cddf9dbf1c5ce20c07d6e23222cf1e92a195acf6227e4901f3962e81a1e53a43490aa
afd9a673c4 test: roundtrip wallet backwards compat downgrade (Andrew Chow)
bbf43c63b9 test: Add 25.0 to wallet backwards compatibiilty test (Andrew Chow)
538939ec39 test: Run upgrade test on all nodes (Andrew Chow)
6d4699028b test: Run downgrade test on descriptor wallets (Andrew Chow)
f158573be1 test: Add 0.21 tr() incompatibility test (Andrew Chow)
f41215c3f0 test: add logging 0.17 incompatibilities in wallet back compat (Andrew Chow)
71c03aeff7 test: Refactor v19 addmultisigaddress test to be distinct (Andrew Chow)
53f35d02cb test: Remove w1_v18 from wallet backwards compatibility (Andrew Chow)
313d665437 test: Fix 0.16 wallet paths and downgrade test (Andrew Chow)
5d8469362a test: Add helper functions for checking node versions (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
It was somewhat surprising to me that wallet_backwards_compatibility.py did not catch #27915 since the purpose of the test is to find downgrade issues such as that. It turns out the test was deficient in several places when it came to testing descriptor wallets, as well as deficient in addition to failing to correctly test some releases.
This PR fixes these test cases, adds more informative logging, slightly refactors the entire test in order to better test future versions, and adds a 25.0 node to the test.
Notable changes:
* The compatibility test with 0.16 should not have been passing. The wallets were being copied incorrectly for 0.16 and resulting in 0.16 creating new wallets rather than testing the target wallets.
* The downgrade test will actually be run on descriptor wallets and it will test that downgrades are successful, and a subsequent upgrade is also successful. This catches #27915.
* The upgrade and downgrade test will be run on all versions up to master, rather than just 0.16, 0.17, and 0.19.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-ACK afd9a673c4
furszy:
ACK afd9a67
Tree-SHA512: dd2d85cab29a636da93020681c533534af4a9cda18d8550c9db9d8937719b3a225025966981c5d4d2f30486448a772b760f0e723a25ea6bc49df80387dc7b8b0
fa28f5a381 test: Bump walletpassphrase timeouts to avoid intermittent issues (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This bumps all timeouts for all `walletpassphrase` to avoid intermittent issues in `valgrind` (or other sanitizers).
As an idea for a follow-up, `walletpassphrase` could be changed to treat `0` as "no timeout" instead of "instant timeout".
Example failure:
```
node0 2023-09-03T22:44:38.374955Z [httpworker.3] [rpc/server.cpp:594] [RPCRunLater] [rpc] queue run of timer lockwallet(w6) in 60 seconds (using HTTP)
test 2023-09-03T22:44:40.173000Z TestFramework.bitcoincli (DEBUG): Running bitcoin-cli ['-rpcwallet=w6', 'getnewaddress', '', 'legacy']
node0 2023-09-03T22:44:59.810893Z [http] [httpserver.cpp:255] [http_request_cb] [http] Received a POST request for /wallet/w6 from 127.0.0.1:48928
node0 2023-09-03T22:44:59.813132Z [httpworker.1] [rpc/request.cpp:181] [parse] [rpc] ThreadRPCServer method=getnewaddress user=__cookie__
node0 2023-09-03T22:44:59.837183Z [httpworker.1] [wallet/sqlite.cpp:53] [TraceSqlCallback] [/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/test_runner/test_runner_₿_🏃_20230903_183350/wallet_createwallet_171/node0/regtest/w6/wallet.dat] SQLite Statement: INSERT or REPLACE into main values(?, ?)
node0 2023-09-03T22:44:59.929735Z [httpworker.1] [wallet/sqlite.cpp:53] [TraceSqlCallback] [/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/test_runner/test_runner_₿_🏃_20230903_183350/wallet_createwallet_171/node0/regtest/w6/wallet.dat] SQLite Statement: INSERT or REPLACE into main values(?, ?)
node0 2023-09-03T22:44:59.934484Z [httpworker.1] [wallet/sqlite.cpp:53] [TraceSqlCallback] [/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/test_runner/test_runner_₿_🏃_20230903_183350/wallet_createwallet_171/node0/regtest/w6/wallet.dat] SQLite Statement: INSERT or REPLACE into main values(?, ?)
node0 2023-09-03T22:44:59.935467Z [httpworker.1] [wallet/sqlite.cpp:53] [TraceSqlCallback] [/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/test_runner/test_runner_₿_🏃_20230903_183350/wallet_createwallet_171/node0/regtest/w6/wallet.dat] SQLite Statement: INSERT or REPLACE into main values(?, ?)
test 2023-09-03T22:45:02.328000Z TestFramework.bitcoincli (DEBUG): Running bitcoin-cli ['-rpcwallet=w6', 'signmessage', 'mqatqH4VQmrZ81nxUfrnfcLnxgbzhZb4PC', 'test']
node0 2023-09-03T22:45:20.269375Z [http] [httpserver.cpp:255] [http_request_cb] [http] Received a POST request for /wallet/w6 from 127.0.0.1:44618
node0 2023-09-03T22:45:20.270670Z [httpworker.2] [rpc/request.cpp:181] [parse] [rpc] ThreadRPCServer method=signmessage user=__cookie__
test 2023-09-03T22:45:23.490000Z TestFramework.bitcoincli (DEBUG): Running bitcoin-cli ['-rpcwallet=w6', 'keypoolrefill', '1']
node0 2023-09-03T22:45:40.244603Z [http] [httpserver.cpp:255] [http_request_cb] [http] Received a POST request for /wallet/w6 from 127.0.0.1:32854
node0 2023-09-03T22:45:40.293021Z [httpworker.0] [rpc/request.cpp:181] [parse] [rpc] ThreadRPCServer method=keypoolrefill user=__cookie__
test 2023-09-03T22:45:41.852000Z TestFramework (ERROR): JSONRPC error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 131, in main
self.run_test()
File "/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/wallet_createwallet.py", line 156, in run_test
w6.keypoolrefill(1)
File "/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/test_node.py", line 732, in __call__
return self.cli.send_cli(self.command, *args, **kwargs)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/test_node.py", line 795, in send_cli
raise JSONRPCException(dict(code=int(code), message=message))
test_framework.authproxy.JSONRPCException: Error: Please enter the wallet passphrase with walletpassphrase first. (-13)
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa28f5a381
Tree-SHA512: 58caa569cec39acc121d4cc038a4190937af34e85d2696272ed4f2792fd386469b0cfefd2cb564438fedded97b21b23d8bf46ba27b5633671a277ed4679f0d5d
