1066d10f71 scripted-diff: rename TxRelay members (John Newbery)
575bbd0dea [net processing] Move tx relay data to Peer (John Newbery)
785f55f7ee [net processing] Move m_wtxid_relay to Peer (John Newbery)
36346703f8 [net] Add CNode.m_relays_txs and CNode.m_bloom_filter_loaded (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This continues the work of moving application layer data into net_processing, by moving all tx data into the new Peer object added in #19607.
For motivation, see #19398.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
ACK 1066d10f71 - This is a good layer separation improvement with no behavior changes.
glozow:
utACK 1066d10f71
Tree-SHA512: 0c9d6b8a0a05e2d816b6d6588b7df133842ec960ae67667813422aa7bd8eb5308599c714f3822a98ddbdf364ffab9050b055079277ba4aff24092557ff99ebcc
cccc1e70b8 Enforce Taproot script flags whenever WITNESS is set (MarcoFalke)
fa42299411 Remove nullptr check in GetBlockScriptFlags (MarcoFalke)
faadc606c7 refactor: Pass const reference instead of pointer to GetBlockScriptFlags (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Now that Taproot is active, it makes sense to enforce its rules on all blocks, even historic ones, regardless of the deployment status.
### Benefits:
(With "script flags" I mean "taproot script verification flags".)
* Script flags are known ahead for all blocks (even blocks not yet created) and do not change. This may benefit static analysis, code review, and development of new script features that build on Taproot.
* Any future bugs introduced in the deployment code won't have any effect on the script flags, as they are independent of deployment.
* Enforcing the taproot rules regardless of the deployment status makes testing easier because invalid blocks after activation are also invalid before activation. So there is no need to differentiate the two cases.
* It gives belt-and-suspenders protection against a practically expensive and theoretically impossible IBD reorg attack where the node is eclipsed. While `nMinimumChainWork` already protects against this, the cost for a few months worth of POW might be lowered until a major version release of Bitcoin Core reaches EOL. The needed work for the attack is the difference between `nMinimumChainWork` and the work at block 709632.
For reference, previously the same was done for P2SH and WITNESS in commit 0a8b7b4b33.
### Implementation:
I found one block which fails verification with the flags applied, so I added a `TaprootException`, similar to the `BIP16Exception`.
For reference, the debug log:
```
ERROR: ConnectBlock(): CheckInputScripts on b10c007c60e14f9d087e0291d4d0c7869697c6681d979c6639dbd960792b4d41 failed with non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Witness program was passed an empty witness)
BlockChecked: block hash=0000000000000000000f14c35b2d841e986ab5441de8c585d5ffe55ea1e395ad state=non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Witness program was passed an empty witness)
InvalidChainFound: invalid block=0000000000000000000f14c35b2d841e986ab5441de8c585d5ffe55ea1e395ad height=692261 log2_work=92.988459 date=2021-07-23T08:24:20Z
InvalidChainFound: current best=0000000000000000000067b17a4c0ffd77c29941b15ad356ca8f980af137a25d height=692260 log2_work=92.988450 date=2021-07-23T07:47:31Z
ERROR: ConnectTip: ConnectBlock 0000000000000000000f14c35b2d841e986ab5441de8c585d5ffe55ea1e395ad failed, non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Witness program was passed an empty witness)
```
Hint for testing, make sure to set `-noassumevalid`.
### Considerations
Obviously this change can lead to consensus splits on the network in light of massive reorgs. Currently the last block before Taproot activation, that is the last block without the Taproot script flags set, is only buried by a few days of POW. However, when and if this patch is included in the next major release, it will be buried by a few months of POW. BIP90 considerations apply when looking at reorgs this large.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK cccc1e70b8
achow101:
ACK cccc1e70b8
laanwj:
Code review ACK cccc1e70b8
ajtowns:
ACK cccc1e70b8 ; code review; wrote a "getblockscriptflags" rpc to quickly check that blocks just had bit 17 (taproot) added; review of earlier revisions had established non-exception blocks do validate with taproot rules enabled.
jamesob:
ACK cccc1e70b8 ([`jamesob/ackr/23536.1.MarcoFalke.enforce_taproot_script_f`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/23536.1.MarcoFalke.enforce_taproot_script_f))
Tree-SHA512: 00044de68939caef6420ffd588c1291c041a8b397c80a3df1e3e3487fbeae1821d23975c51c95e44e774558db76f943b00b4e27cbd0213f64a9253116dc6edde
f8cba0d911 test: Change default test logging directory (Yancy Ribbens)
Pull request description:
This PR changes the default test log location request here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17224. Instead of using the location of the makefile [automatic variable](https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#Automatic-Variables) `$<` I extract just the basename and then prepend a new location `./test`. This is done because `$<` represents the variable name AND location of the prerequisite here.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: f0fbc530cf0e14c284b4bbf6671c145b1d7a2e1f5561f5c5d09f0cbe88b98e620e763bbbf2dfa9aeeec3dcc9b0127939e105e14c7e4f6660c7c19663622a393d
049003fe68 coinselection: Remove COutput operators == and != (Andrew Chow)
f6c39c6adb coinselection: Remove CInputCoin (Andrew Chow)
70f31f1a81 coinselection: Use COutput instead of CInputCoin (Andrew Chow)
14fbb57b79 coinselection: Add effective value and fees to COutput (Andrew Chow)
f0821230b8 moveonly: move COutput to coinselection.h (Andrew Chow)
42e974e15c wallet: Remove CWallet and CWalletTx from COutput's constructor (Andrew Chow)
14d04d5ad1 wallet: Replace CWalletTx in COutput with COutPoint and CTxOut (Andrew Chow)
0ba4d1916e wallet: Provide input bytes to COutput (Andrew Chow)
d51f27d3bb wallet: Store whether a COutput is from the wallet (Andrew Chow)
b799814bbd wallet: Store tx time in COutput (Andrew Chow)
46022953ee wallet: Remove use_max_sig default value (Andrew Chow)
10379f007f scripted-diff: Rename COutput member variables (Andrew Chow)
c7c64db41e wallet: cleanup COutput constructor (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
While working on coin selection code, it occurred to me that `CInputCoin` is really a subset of `COutput` and the conversion of a `COutput` to a `CInputCoin` does not appear to be all that useful. So this PR adds fields that are present in `CInputCoin` to `COutput` and replaces the usage of `CInputCoin` with `COutput`.
`COutput` is also moved to coinselection.h. As part of this move, the usage of `CWalletTx` is removed from `COutput`. It is instead replaced by storing a `COutPoint` and the `CTxOut` rather than the entire `CWalletTx` as coin selection does not really need the full `CWalletTx`. The `CWalletTx` was only used for figuring out whether the transaction containing the output was from the current wallet, and for the transaction's time. These are now parameters to `COutput`'s constructor.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 049003fe68, just adding comments and removing == operators since last review
w0xlt:
reACK 049003f
Xekyo:
reACK 049003fe68
Tree-SHA512: 048b4cd620a0415e1d9fe8597257ee4bc64656566e1d28a9bdd147d6d72dc87c3f34a3339fa9ab6acf42c388df7901fc4ee900ccaabc3de790ffad162b544c15
58a14795b8 test: passing -onlynet=onion with -onion=0/-noonion raises expected init error (Jon Atack)
7000f66d36 test: passing -onlynet=onion without -proxy/-onion raises expected init error (Jon Atack)
8332e6e4cf test: passing invalid -onion raises expected init error (Jon Atack)
d5edb08708 test: passing invalid -proxy raises expected init error (Jon Atack)
bd57dcbaf2 test: hoist proxy out of 2 network loops in feature_proxy.py (Jon Atack)
afdf2de282 test: add CJDNS to LimitedAndReachable_Network unit tests (Jon Atack)
2b7a8180a9 net, init: assert each network reachability is true by default (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Adds missing network reachability test coverage and an assertion during init, noticed while reviewing #22834:
- assert during init that each network reachability is true by default
- add CJDNS to the `LimitedAndReachable_Network` unit tests
- hoist proxy out of two network loops in feature_proxy.py
- test that passing invalid `-proxy` raises expected init error
- test that passing invalid `-onion` raises expected init error
- test that passing `-onlynet=onion` without `-proxy` and `-onion` raises expected init error
- test that passing `-onlynet=onion` with `-onion=0` and with `-noonion` raises expected init error
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK 58a14795b8
brunoerg:
ACK 58a14795b8
dongcarl:
Code Review ACK 58a14795b8
Tree-SHA512: bdee6dd0c12bb63591ce7c9321fe77b509ab1265123054e774adc38a187746dddafe1627cbe89e990bcc78b45e194bfef8dc782710d5b217e2e2106ab0158827
fa84a49526 Use CAmount for fee delta and modified fee (MarcoFalke)
fa8857c3f7 Replace struct update_fee_delta with lambda (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The same was done for another struct in e177fcab38.
Also, change type of feeDelta from int64_t to CAmount.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK fa84a49526
promag:
Code review ACK fa84a49526.
Tree-SHA512: 2b9ee449d348b0f685793a35c6dd3c57ed97fdf707a89495a0518bb332f407303b48723e667351e96f2b698e0a2ade27095517a3accd926d4ec85e58d6fd441f
b2813980b8 init: disallow reindex-chainstate when pruning (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
The combination of `-reindex-chainstate` and `-prune` currently makes the node stuck in an endless loop:
- `LoadChainstate()` will wipe the existing chainstate (so we have no genesis block anymore). It won't clean up unusable block files by calling `CleanupBlockRevFiles()` as for full `-reindex`.
- `ThreadImport()` has [logic](91d12344b1/src/node/blockstorage.cpp (L855)) of reloading Genesis after reindexing. This is what makes full `-reindex` work with `-prune` but it's not executed for `-reindex-chainstate`.
- Since we still don't have a genesis block, init will wait for it forever in an endless loop ([code](91d12344b1/src/init.cpp (L1630-L1640))).
Fix this by disallowing `-reindex-chainstate` together with `-prune`. This is discouraged in the help for `-reindex-chainstate` anyway ("When in pruning mode or if blocks on disk might be corrupted, use full -reindex instead.") but wasn't enforced.
Fixes#24242
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK b2813980b8
Tree-SHA512: 7220842daaf9a4f972d82b13b81fdeac2833bf5e665c5b0f8eaf6a4bcd0725c8e97d19ec956ca4b730065a983475bb3a2732713d338f4caf8666ccbf63d4d988
999982b06c build: Add --enable-c++20 option (MarcoFalke)
fae679065e Add CSerializedNetMsg::Copy() helper (MarcoFalke)
fabb7c4ba6 Make fs.h C++20 compliant (MarcoFalke)
fae2220f4e scheduler: Capture ‘this’ explicitly in lambda (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is for CI and devs only and doesn't change that C++17 is the standard we are currently using. The option `--enable-c++20` allows CI to check that the C++17 code in the repo is also valid C++20. (There are some cases where valid C++17 doesn't compile under C++20).
Also, it allows developers to easily play with C++20 in the codebase.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 999982b06c. Since last review was rebased, and enum-conversion change was dropped, and CSerializedNetMsg copy workaround was added
fanquake:
utACK 999982b06c
Tree-SHA512: afc95ba03ea2b937017fc8e2b1449379cd2b6f7093c430d2e344c665a00c51e402d6651cbcbd0be8118ea1e54c3a86e67d2021d19ba1d4da67168e9fcb6b6f83
faf37c217a rpc: Exclude descriptor when address is excluded (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
I don't think output descriptors should be used to describe redeem scripts and witness scripts.
Fix this by excluding them when it doesn't make sense.
This should only affect the `decodepsbt` RPC.
Found by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23083
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK faf37c217a
jonatack:
ACK faf37c217a
Tree-SHA512: ebd581ad639e70080e26028723fed287caa3fa4d7b836936645020d6cd9b7586585d7113b043442c444a9dc90c23b93efd7f8b8a7d6cf5db1e42137b67c497c3
This makes code that uses the helper less verbose.
Moreover, this makes net_processing C++20 compliant. Otherwise, it would
lead to a compile error (see below). C++20 disables aggregate
initialization when any constructor is declared. See
http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2018/p1008r1.pdf
net_processing.cpp:1627:42: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'CSerializedNetMsg'
m_connman.PushMessage(pnode, CSerializedNetMsg{ser_cmpctblock.data, ser_cmpctblock.m_type});
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Without the changes, g++ will warn to compile under C++20:
scheduler.cpp:114:21: warning: implicit capture of ‘this’ via ‘[=]’ is deprecated in C++20 [-Wdeprecated]
114 | scheduleFromNow([=] { Repeat(*this, f, delta); }, delta);
| ^
scheduler.cpp:114:21: note: add explicit ‘this’ or ‘*this’ capture
39b1763730 Replace use of `ArgsManager` with `DatabaseOptions` (Kiminuo)
Pull request description:
Contributes to #21005.
The goal of this PR is to remove `gArgs` from database classes (i.e. `bdb.h` and `sqlite.h`) so that they can be tested without relying on `gArgs` in tests.
Notes:
* My goal is to enable unit-testing without relying on `gArgs` as much as possible. Global variables are hard to reason about which in turn makes it slightly harder to contribute to this codebase. When the compiler does the heavy lifting for us and allows us only to construct an object (or call a method) with valid parameters, we may also save some time in code reviews. The cost for this is passing an argument which is not for free but the cost is very miniscule compared to benefits, I think.
* GUI code is an exception because it seems fine to have `gArgs` there so I don't plan to make changes in `src/qt` folder, for example.
* My approach to removal of `gArgs` uses is moving from lower levels to upper ones and pass `ArgsManager` as an argument as needed. The approach is very similar to what #20158.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 39b1763730
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 39b1763730. Just the two small ReadDatabaseArgs and Berkeley open changes that were discussed since the last review
Tree-SHA512: aa066b314db593e46c18698fe8cdd500f558b405dc04e4a9a3ff57b52b5b3a81a6cb090e0e661785d1d02c1bf18958c1f4cd715ff233aab63381e3f80960622d
fae5d06eed Remove unused feebumper code (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This was accidentally added in commit 0ea47ba7b3. Presumably due to a copy-paste error, as `CreateTransaction` already takes care of the rbf-signal.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fae5d06eed
promag:
Code review ACK fae5d06eed
Tree-SHA512: 81aaf9c6bd9a4e2ad1789880bd8f2191f0ae9ba0a02794aa5db523236ea7df1c0dca078563219d293c694373c0a63c5bf168a85443e86556453ae5439791a618
fa2d176016 Move txoutproof RPCs to txoutproof.cpp (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The txoutproof RPCs don't really fit into `rawtransaction.cpp`, as they deal with txids, not with raw transactions. As they are placed in the `blockchain` RPC category, they could be moved there. However, `blockchain.cpp` already takes about 20 seconds to compile (and `rawtransaction.cpp` even longer), so move them to a separate file.
Can be reviewed with `--color-moved=dimmed-zebra --color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space`.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa2d176016
theStack:
Concept and code-review ACK fa2d176016
Tree-SHA512: 6250e5f87b6237f604d69643f9a809b238702d73f041792c537aeadeafdb60ab8e0dca1d83347d0d6c85900ce179df14365ae303ca3930ed33a528a862f85aa3
These operators are used only by the tests in std::mismatch. As
std::mismatch can take a binary predicate, we can use a lambda that
achieves the same instead.
Instead of having a pointer to the CWalletTx in COutput, we can just
store the COutPoint and the CTxOut as those are the only things we need
from the CWalletTx. Other things CWalletTx used to provide were time and
fIsFromMe but these are also being stored by COutput.
fa7deaa046 wallet: Pass FastRandomContext& to coin selection (MarcoFalke)
77773b061c wallet: Pass FastRandomContext& to DiscourageFeeSniping (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Passing around a single randomness context shouldn't come with any downsides, but documents better where randomness is used and allows the unit test to be deterministic, if they wish to be so.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa7deaa046
promag:
Code review ACK fa7deaa046.
glozow:
light code review ACK fa7deaa046
Tree-SHA512: c16287708cc82ce58311710595d0127af42fb156c93fbcaa5bde634ce323d325f4d8c99a74af24423ab22b5ad58163dd771e8b1a0e7d6bff39c9fb2a1cb21bc7
If the user has unchecked "Allow incoming connections" in
`Settings->Options...->Network` then `fListen=false` is saved in
`~/.config/Bitcoin/Bitcoin-Qt.conf`. This flips `-listen` to `false`
during startup, but leaves `-listenonion` to `true`.
This flipping of `-listen` is done in `OptionsModel::Init()` after
`InitParameterInteraction()` has been executed which would have flipped
`-listenonion`, should it have seen `-listen` being `false`
(this is a difference between `bitcoind` and `bitcoin-qt`).
Fixes: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/567
9b52672700 For descriptor pubkey parse errors, include context information (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
This adds readily-available context information to the error string, for further disambiguation.
This is a revival of #16123 which was largely addressed in #16542.
Note 'Multi:' is used rather than 'multi():' as it also encompasses 'sortedmulti():'
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 9b52672700
theStack:
ACK 9b52672700
Tree-SHA512: 96533ea8c3ac7010f9b62e75b4bd20b65aff843030eb91c7a88312975acecaaf17909b7d1841f45edc86dbf7fa402d208adb85f0673bd79b857dbebacb8c9395
acd98adaf1 qt: Avoid potential -Wdeprecated-enum-enum-conversion warning (Hennadii Stepanov)
d8641f04e4 qt: Use human-readable strings in preference to hard-coded integers (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR is related to bitcoin/bitcoin#24169. It adjusts code in order to avoid `-Wdeprecated-enum-enum-conversion` warnings instead of disabling them.
Could be tested with gcc 11.2.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
Approach ACK acd98adaf1
fanquake:
untested ACK acd98adaf1 - thanks.
promag:
Code review ACK acd98adaf1.
Tree-SHA512: e8043d997d85f8dba0f37ca02f1c60eb756a1732cf76a75908b01eb2cf7a4c6d4aaf6007271a929c213de37a0c1d96bc25280f0ee9eca488f370904461222ede
b2774fc0be torcontrol: Query Tor for correct -onion configuration (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Currently, we just assume any running Tor instance provides localhost port 9050 for SOCKS, and configure `-onion` accordingly when we get a Tor control connection.
This actually queries the Tor node for its SOCKS listeners, and uses the configured port instead.
For backward compatibility, it falls back to localhost:9050 if it can't get any better port info. I'm not sure if that's the correct action to take when the Tor daemon explicitly says there are no ports listening...
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Tested ACK (FreeBSD) b2774fc0be
vasild:
ACK b2774fc0be
jonatack:
ACK b2774fc0be review, rebased to master, debug build, ran unit tests, tested happy path only
Tree-SHA512: 2fa93a3cf0cb675801d1b51322ce953ea9b2317f78154a53b603244d74252f434cc1eaa5ae48cb3fe6bdc4ce984a6d976ff95bb046f7933b9740332942378c02
fa9086d085 test: Limit scope of id global which is shared between subtests (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Globals aren't too nice when testing, as leak state between subtests run in the same process. For example, when checking peer ids in the tests, they might pass/fail depending on other tests run in the same process.
Fix this by making `id` not a global.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK fa9086d085.
Tree-SHA512: 0a53dde428570086f4557b23112e6460d6413bedf6ef487bd56e88f83cd5f4526f44effa8076cdeaf4761ecc062c346948e0bff434808bbf9b558eabd81328e3
facd5d92e1 doc: Fix getblockchaininfo/getdeploymentinfo RPC docs (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Also, fix whitespace to be `4` spaces. Can be reviewed with `--ignore-all-space --word-diff-regex=.`.
Found by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23083
ACKs for top commit:
luke-jr:
crACK facd5d92e1
Tree-SHA512: 113228a6b140009cecd9068fb634d352148670589f647350e41c02a35e0ca306b4a2d3f2588cd9ef14a2ab7d1f23d0d2f83b5ebb00b60f17a1d16a8d71386fd2
9d2005285c doc: Revise comments and whitespace to clarify (Ben Woosley)
def43a4d88 refactor: Rename i to curr_try in SelectCoinsBnB (Ben Woosley)
1dd0923677 refactor: Track BnB selection by index (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
This is prompted by #13167 and presented as a friendly alternative to it.
IMO you can improve code readability and performance by about 20% by tracking the selected utxos by index, rather than by position. This reduces the storage access complexity from roughly O(utxo_size) to O(selection_size).
On my machine (median of 5 trials):
```
BnBExhaustion, 5, 650, 2.2564, 0.000672999, 0.000711565, 0.000693112 - master
BnBExhaustion, 5, 650, 1.76232, 0.000528563, 0.000568806, 0.000539147 - this PR
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
reACK 9d2005285c
glozow:
code review ACK 9d2005285c
Xekyo:
reACK 9d2005285c
Tree-SHA512: 453ea11ad58c48928dc76956e3e98916f6924e95510eb02fe89a899ff102fe9cc08a04d557f381ad0218a210275e5383101d971c1ffad38b06b1c57d81144315
fa61dd44f9 p2p: Serialize cmpctblock at most once in NewPoWValidBlock (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Instead of serializing for each peer, serialize at most once and copy the raw data for each peer.
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
reACK fa61dd44f9
theStack:
Code-review ACK fa61dd44f9
Tree-SHA512: ed029aeaea67fdac8ddb865069f8166bc0dd8480418c405628e3e1a43b61161584a09a1814668bcd220602e8732e188be2bfed9242aa81bdbd92c64c702ed138
4d2b503d6c gui: improve "Addresses Rate-Limited" translator comments and tooltip in peers tab (Jon Atack)
81ef1f7ef1 gui: improve "Addresses Processed" translator comments and tooltip in peers tab (Jon Atack)
77f24aac52 gui: improve "Address Relay" translator comments and tooltip in peers tab (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Per translator feedback in this thread: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/526#discussion_r809237830
*"The lack of string context in Transifex is a real problem for this project, as proper context (dev notes and/or screenshots) are essential to achieve quality translations."*
This pull adds developer notes for transifex translators via `extracomment` tags, and it improves the existing ones and their tooltips with more context, clarity and completeness for the following peer tab fields as a follow-up to bitcoin-core/gui#526:
- address relay
- addresses processed
- addressed rate-limited
It looks like only six lines of diff, but they are loooong lines.
If this is the right direction, the same can be done for other fields in follow-ups.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
re-ACK [4d2b503](4d2b503d6c)
hebasto:
ACK 4d2b503d6c, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: a185f46a66375a5fd6854640745b7d1d00740cf7be58db03256f44d71acc351e1770de137cb3bc9c1f0ea3cabd7cfa1cb1ccb87ec0df222680924ca3dab6c8bf
Also, remove cs_main guard from m_wtxid_relay_peers and make it atomic.
This should be fine since we don't need m_wtxid_relay_peers to be
synchronized with m_wtxid_relay exactly at all times.
After this change, RelayTransaction no longer requires cs_main.
We'll move the transaction relay data into Peer in subsequent commits,
but the inbound eviction logic needs to know if the peer is relaying
txs and if the peer has loaded a bloom filter.
This is currently redundant information with m_tx_relay->fRelayTxes,
but when m_tx_relay is moved into net_processing, then we'll need these
separate fields in CNode.
Instead of determining whether the containing transaction is from the
wallet dynamically as needed, just pass it in to COutput and store it.
The transaction ownership isn't going to change.
f59bee3fb2 fuzz: execute each file in dir without fuzz engine (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Phony fuzzing (phuzzing)! Run the fuzz testing code against known inputs to detect errors. Advantage is you can easily test using the existing qa-assets datasets without having to compile with fuzzing enabled; disadvantage is that it doesn't do any actual fuzzing.
Example usage:
```
$ for a in ${QA_ASSETS}/fuzz_seed_corpus/*; do echo ${a##*/}; done | xargs -P8 -I {} /bin/sh -c "FUZZ={} test/fuzz/fuzz ${QA_ASSETS}/fuzz_seed_corpus/{}"
No fuzzer for address_deserialize.
No fuzzer for addrdb.
No fuzzer for banentry_deserialize.
addition_overflow: succeeded against 848 files in 0s.
asmap: succeeded against 981 files in 0s.
checkqueue: succeeded against 211 files in 0s.
...
```
(`-P8` says run 8 of the tasks in parallel)
If there are failures, the first one will be reported and the program will abort with output like:
```
fuzz: test/fuzz/versionbits.cpp:336: void (anonymous namespace)::versionbits_fuzz_target(FuzzBufferType): Assertion `exp_state != ThresholdState::FAILED' failed.
Error processing seed "corpus/versionbits/35345ae8e722234095810b1117a29b63af7621af"
```
Rebase of #22763, which was a rebase of #21496, but also reports the name of the fuzzer and the time taken.
Fixes#21461
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: d8d046d4a309652eb13de42116276bf992480bc887ad3535a8ff18b354cb24826bc562b06af63802ec945c637f046563b6a5601d6321b46a5543127daafea09b
f865cf8ded Add and use BlockManager::GetAllBlockIndices (Carl Dong)
28ba0313ea Add and use CBlockIndexHeightOnlyComparator (Carl Dong)
12eb05df63 move-only: Move CBlockIndexWorkComparator to blockstorage (Carl Dong)
c600ee3816 Only load BlockMan in BlockMan member functions (Carl Dong)
42e56d9b18 style-only: No need for std::pair for vSortedByHeight (Carl Dong)
3bbb6fea05 style-only: Various blockstorage.cpp cleanups (Carl Dong)
5be9ee3c54 refactor: more const annotations for uses of CBlockIndex* (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
The only important commit is "Only load BlockMan in BlockMan member functions", everything else is all just small style changes.
Here's the commit message, reproduced:
```
This commit effectively splits the "load block index itself" logic from
"derive Chainstate variables from loaded block index" logic.
This means that BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex{,DB} will only load what's
relevant to the BlockManager.
```
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK f865cf8ded ; code review only
MarcoFalke:
review ACK f865cf8ded 🗂
Tree-SHA512: 7b204d782834e06fd7329d022e2ae860181b4e8105c33bfb928539a4ec24161dc7438a9c4d4ee279dcad77de310c160b997bb8aa18923243d0fd55ccf4ad7c3a
2efdfb88aa gui: restore Send for external signer (Sjors Provoost)
4b5a6cd149 refactor: helper function signWithExternalSigner() (Sjors Provoost)
026b5b4523 move-only: helper function to present PSBT (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Fixes#551
For the simplest use case of a wallet with one external signer and "PSBT Controls" disabled in settings (the default), the send dialog will behave the same as when using a wallet with private keys. I.e. there's no "Create Unsigned" button.
When PSBT controls are turned on, you can now actually make a PSBT with signing it; before this PR that button would trigger a sign event and would broadcast the transaction.
In case a multisig, the Send button will sign on the device, and then fall back to presenting a PSBT (same behavior as before #441).
This PR starts with two refactoring commits to move some stuff into a helper function for improved readability in general, and to make the main commit easier to review.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
utACK 2efdfb88aa diff review since my last review, code re-review, rebased to current master, verified clean debug build of each commit
luke-jr:
utACK 2efdfb88aa
Tree-SHA512: e8731a0ef9e87564b2676c7b022b742d9621bba964c19dba9fd9f6961eb608737a9e1a22c0a3c8b2f2f6d583bba067606ee8392422e82082deefb20ea7b88c7c
bce9aaf31e Unit tests for IsWitnessProgram and IsP2WSH. (Daniel Kraft)
Pull request description:
This adds basic unit tests for `CScript::IsPayToWitnessScriptHash` and `CScript::IsWitnessProgram`, similar to the existing tests for `CScript::IsPayToScriptHash`. These tests are probably not super important given the other existing tests for segwit related code, but may be useful in catching some errors early.
This implements #14737.
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
tACK bce9aaf31e (`make check)`.
Tree-SHA512: 3cff5efc4ac53079289c72bfba8b1937bc103baadd32bb1fba41e78017f65f9cca17678c3202ad0711eae42b351d4132d9ed9b4e2dc07d138298691a09c4e822
fafe06c379 bench: Sort bench_bench_bitcoin_SOURCES (MarcoFalke)
fa31dc9b71 bench: Add logging benchmark (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Might make finding performance bottlenecks or regressions (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17218) easier.
For example, fuzzing relies on disabled logging to be as fast as possible.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
ACK fafe06c379
Tree-SHA512: dd858f3234a4dfb00bd7dec4398eb076370a4b9746aa24eecee7da86f6882398a2d086e5ab0b7c9f7321abcb135e7ffc54cc78e60d18b90379c6dba6d613b3f7
Before this change the send confirmation dialog would keep the Send option disabled. The Create Unsigned choice would actually send. This is potentially confusing.
With this change the Create Unsigned button will not attempt to sign and always produce a PSBT. The Send button will attempt to sign, and only return a PSBT if more signatures are needed.
When using an external signer, the Create Unsigned option only appears when PSBT controls are enabled in the wallet settings.
This commit maintains the pre-existing behavior of filling the PSBT (without signing) even when not using an external signer.
Closes#551
Co-authored-by: Jon Atack <jon@atack.com>
fad4c8934c Add RegisterMempoolRPCCommands helper (MarcoFalke)
fafd40b541 refactor: Avoid int64_t -> size_t -> int64_t conversion (MarcoFalke)
fa2a5f301a rpc: Move mempool RPCs to new file (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `blockchain.cpp` file is quite large. This makes it harder to navigate and increases the memory required to compile.
Improve on both issues by splitting up the mempool RPCs to a separate file.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK fad4c8934c.
theStack:
Code-review ACK fad4c8934c🏞️
Tree-SHA512: 7f13168ea2cbea51eaef05ca1604fddc919480a2128ec7fa6b1f9365ec5e4822c3df93eb408a19f038c627f2309fa282b9f7f7ec45e5e661fc728f6b33157f89
This commit effectively splits the "load block index itself" logic from
"derive Chainstate variables from loaded block index" logic.
This means that BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex{,DB} will only load what's
relevant to the BlockManager.
I strongly recommend reviewing with the following git-diff flags:
--color-moved=dimmed_zebra --color-moved-ws=allow-indentation-change
fa8d4d9128 scripted-diff: Clarify CheckFinalTxAtTip name (MarcoFalke)
fa4e30b0f3 policy: Remove unused locktime flags (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The locktime flags have many issues:
* They are passed in by a default argument, which is fragile. It has already lead to bugs like the one fixed in commit e30b6ea194.
* They are negative (signed), which doesn't make sense for flags (unsigned in general). According to the review comments when the code was added: "The max on the flags is a fairly weird operation." (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6566#issuecomment-150310861)
* No call site relies on the default argument and they all pass in a single compile-time constant, rendering most of the code dead and untested.
* The dead code calls `GetAdjustedTime` (network adjusted time), which has its own issues. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/4521
Fix all issues by removing them
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK fa8d4d9128
theStack:
Code-review ACK fa8d4d9128
glozow:
ACK fa8d4d9128, agree the default arg `flags` is a massive footgun and just setting max flags is weird. Adding `AtTip` to the names makes sense to me, since they're both testing for *next* block and only ever used for {,re}addition to mempool.
Tree-SHA512: 79f4a52f34909eb598d88bbae7afe8abe5f85f45c128483d16aa83dacd0e5579e561b725d01b1e9a931d1821012a51ad2bc6fb2867f8d09ee541f9d234d696f8
This is a performance optimization - rather than track all visited values
in a bool vector, track the selected index in a vector. This results in a
complexity reduction of O(utxo_size) to O(selection_size).
fa8e76bb90 wallet: Add sanity checks to AntiFeeSnipe (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
I added those sanity checks as part of implementing BIP 326, but I think they make sense on their own. The checks require the transaction to be passed in to `DiscourageFeeSniping`. Also, replace `(int)locktime` cast with the equivalent `int(locktime)` cast.
ACKs for top commit:
chris-belcher:
ACK fa8e76bb90
S3RK:
Code review ACK fa8e76bb90
achow101:
ACK fa8e76bb90
w0xlt:
Code Review ACK fa8e76bb90
Tree-SHA512: 6fe37c85f074851ef09cae8addcb836257089290fecec515c129c3180e9ccb64740aaac76043af10ce7c213e5001568ca6b4b62ae9631f0994ed676b07118074
61152183ab wallet: Add a deprecation warning for newly created legacy wallets (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
As we slowly deprecate legacy wallets, we need to warn users that are making new legacy wallets that their wallet type is going to be unsupported in the future.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 61152183ab
S3RK:
reACK 61152183ab
theStack:
ACK 61152183ab
Tree-SHA512: e89bfb8168869542498958f0c9a2ab302dfd43287f8a49e7d9e09f60438a567bb8b7219a4e569797ee819b30b624f532fcc0b70c6aa0edcb392a301b8ce8b541
5d7c69b887 rpc: rename getdeploymentinfo status-next to status_next (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Rename the `status-next` field to `status_next` in getdeploymentinfo before the RPC is released in v23.
Before
```
Result:
{ (json object)
"hash" : "str", (string) requested block hash (or tip)
"height" : n, (numeric) requested block height (or tip)
"deployments" : { (json object)
"xxxx" : { (json object) name of the deployment
"type" : "str", (string) one of "buried", "bip9"
"height" : n, (numeric, optional) height of the first block which the rules are or will be enforced (only for "buried" type, or "bip9" type with "active" status)
"active" : true|false, (boolean) true if the rules are enforced for the mempool and the next block
"bip9" : { (json object, optional) status of bip9 softforks (only for "bip9" type)
"bit" : n, (numeric, optional) the bit (0-28) in the block version field used to signal this softfork (only for "started" and "locked_in" status)
"start_time" : xxx, (numeric) the minimum median time past of a block at which the bit gains its meaning
"timeout" : xxx, (numeric) the median time past of a block at which the deployment is considered failed if not yet locked in
"min_activation_height" : n, (numeric) minimum height of blocks for which the rules may be enforced
"status" : "str", (string) status of deployment at specified block (one of "defined", "started", "locked_in", "active", "failed")
"since" : n, (numeric) height of the first block to which the status applies
"status-next" : "str", (string) status of deployment at the next block
"statistics" : { (json object, optional) numeric statistics about signalling for a softfork (only for "started" and "locked_in" status)
"period" : n, (numeric) the length in blocks of the signalling period
"threshold" : n, (numeric, optional) the number of blocks with the version bit set required to activate the feature (only for "started" status)
"elapsed" : n, (numeric) the number of blocks elapsed since the beginning of the current period
"count" : n, (numeric) the number of blocks with the version bit set in the current period
"possible" : true|false (boolean, optional) returns false if there are not enough blocks left in this period to pass activation threshold (only for "started" status)
},
"signalling" : "str" (string) indicates blocks that signalled with a # and blocks that did not with a -
}
}
}
}
```
After
```
Result:
{ (json object)
"hash" : "str", (string) requested block hash (or tip)
"height" : n, (numeric) requested block height (or tip)
"deployments" : { (json object)
"xxxx" : { (json object) name of the deployment
"type" : "str", (string) one of "buried", "bip9"
"height" : n, (numeric, optional) height of the first block which the rules are or will be enforced (only for "buried" type, or "bip9" type with "active" status)
"active" : true|false, (boolean) true if the rules are enforced for the mempool and the next block
"bip9" : { (json object, optional) status of bip9 softforks (only for "bip9" type)
"bit" : n, (numeric, optional) the bit (0-28) in the block version field used to signal this softfork (only for "started" and "locked_in" status)
"start_time" : xxx, (numeric) the minimum median time past of a block at which the bit gains its meaning
"timeout" : xxx, (numeric) the median time past of a block at which the deployment is considered failed if not yet locked in
"min_activation_height" : n, (numeric) minimum height of blocks for which the rules may be enforced
"status" : "str", (string) status of deployment at specified block (one of "defined", "started", "locked_in", "active", "failed")
"since" : n, (numeric) height of the first block to which the status applies
"status_next" : "str", (string) status of deployment at the next block
"statistics" : { (json object, optional) numeric statistics about signalling for a softfork (only for "started" and "locked_in" status)
"period" : n, (numeric) the length in blocks of the signalling period
"threshold" : n, (numeric, optional) the number of blocks with the version bit set required to activate the feature (only for "started" status)
"elapsed" : n, (numeric) the number of blocks elapsed since the beginning of the current period
"count" : n, (numeric) the number of blocks with the version bit set in the current period
"possible" : true|false (boolean, optional) returns false if there are not enough blocks left in this period to pass activation threshold (only for "started" status)
},
"signalling" : "str" (string) indicates blocks that signalled with a # and blocks that did not with a -
}
}
}
}
```
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 4facfd7af3cfb7b6f5495758c4387602802f5e39d9270b162d17350a7f954eab0b74d895f17f0d8dfbc7814d36db7cff56d08c42728432885ea6f4e37aea4aa8
5ce3057c8e test: set segwit height back to 0 on regtest (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
The change of `consensus.SegwitHeight` from 0 to 1 for regtest in #22818 had the effect that if I create a regtest enviroment with current master (or 23.x), and then try to load this chain with an older version (22.x), I get an InitError
`Witness data for blocks after height 0 requires validation. Please restart with -reindex`
and have to reindex because `BLOCK_OPT_WITNESS` is no longer set for the Genesis block and `NeedsRedownload()` in validation returns `true` with an older version.
That might be a bit annoying for tests that use a shared regtest dir with different versions.
If people think this is enough of an issue to be worth fixing, I think it should also make it into 23.x
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Concept and code-review ACK 5ce3057c8e
Tree-SHA512: b0e89ff7fc953bc0ae929d2da44cde7149321d987fb4763934f6c9635d00d807129a50b459cc5e69e86bb1819e4b063b969486e8016a1cb8db8f905fa315653d
fae20e6b50 Revert "Avoid the use of P0083R3 std::set::merge" (MarcoFalke)
fab53b5fd4 ci/doc: Set minimum required clang/libc++ version to 8.0 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is not for 23.0, but for 24.0. It comes with the following benefits:
* Can use C++17 P0083R3 std::set::merge from libc++ 8.0
* No longer need to provide support for clang-7, which already fails to compile on some architectures (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21294#issuecomment-998098483)
This should be fine, given that all supported operating systems ship with at least clang-10:
* CentOS 8: clang-12
* Stretch: https://packages.debian.org/stretch/clang-11
* Buster: https://packages.debian.org/buster-backports/clang-11
* Bionic: https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic-updates/clang-10
* Focal: https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/clang-10
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fae20e6b50 - I think this is fine to do. I would be surprised if in another 6 months time someone was stuck on a system we supported, needing to compile Core, and only had access to Clang 7 or older. As mentioned in the PR description, all systems we currently support, already support multiple newer versions of Clang.
hebasto:
ACK fae20e6b50, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 3b4c6c130ff40dd7e84934af076863415e5dd661d823c72e3e3832566c65be6e877a7ef9164bbcf394bcea4b897fc29a48db0f231c22ace0e2c9b5638659a628
