Instead of referring to a fixed line number to a file in master (which
is obviously always quickly outdated), use a permalink tied to the
latest commit.
Base32/base64 are mechanisms for encoding binary data. That they'd
decode to a string is just bizarre. The fact that they'd do that
based on the type of input arguments even more so.
CJDNS addresses start with constant 8 bits, so in order to account for
the first 4 random ones, we must take the first 12. Otherwise the entire
CJDNS network will belong to one group.
Connecting to CJDNS addresses works without a proxy, just like
connecting to an IPv6 address. Thus adapt `CService::GetSockAddr()` to
retrieve the `struct sockaddr*` even for `CService::IsCJDNS()` objects.
00b875ba94 addrman: remove invalid addresses when unserializing (Vasil Dimov)
bdb62096f0 fuzz: reduce possible networks check (Vasil Dimov)
a164cd3ba6 net: simplify CNetAddr::IsRoutable() (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
* Simplify some code, now that we know `CNetAddr::IsRFC4193()` and `CNetAddr::IsTor()` cannot be `true` at the same time.
* Drop Tor v2 addresses when loading addrman from `peers.dat` - they would have been loaded as dummy-all-zeros IPv6 addresses and linger in addrman, wasting space.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK 00b875ba94. Reviewed the code, and tested with -DDEBUG_ADDRMAN (unit tests + mainnet run with peers.dat that contained v2 onions).
laanwj:
Code review and lightly tested ACK 00b875ba94
jonatack:
ACK 00b875ba94 reviewed, debug-built with -DEBUG_ADDRMAN rebased to current master, restarted node on mainnet/signet/testnet and verified that on each chain -addrinfo shows no change in address counts (as expected). Added some sanity check asserts, rebuilt/re-ran test. Checked that the new test fails on master with "test/addrman_tests.cpp(824): error: in "addrman_tests/remove_invalid": check addrman.size() == 2 has failed [4 != 2]"
jarolrod:
ACK 00b875ba94
Tree-SHA512: 6ed8e6745134b1b94fffaba28482de909ea39483b46b7f57bda61cdbae7a51251d15cb674de3631772fbeabe153d77a19269f96e62a89102a2d5c01e48f0ba06
Reduce the condition `IsRFC4193() && !IsTor()` to `IsRFC4193()`. We know
that if `IsRFC4193()` is `true` then, for sure, the address is not Tor,
so `!IsTor()` is also `true`.
If a scope id is provided, return it back in the string representation.
Also bring back the test. Closes#21982.
Co-authored-by: Jon Atack <jon@atack.com>
Recognize also I2P addresses in the form `base32hashofpublickey.b32.i2p`
from `CNetAddr::SetSpecial()`.
This makes `Lookup()` support them, which in turn makes it possible to
manually connect to an I2P node by using
`-proxy=i2p_socks5_proxy:port -addnode=i2p_address.b32.i2p:port`
Co-authored-by: Lucas Ontivero <lucasontivero@gmail.com>
Allow creation of valid `CSubNet` objects of non-IP networks and only
match the single address they were created from (like /32 for IPv4 or
/128 for IPv6).
This fixes a deficiency in `CConnman::DisconnectNode(const CNetAddr& addr)`
and in `BanMan` which assume that creating a subnet from any address
using the `CSubNet(CNetAddr)` constructor would later match that address
only. Before this change a non-IP subnet would be invalid and would not
match any address.
886be97af5 Ignore incorrectly-serialized banlist.dat entries (Pieter Wuille)
883cea7dea Restore compatibility with old CSubNet serialization (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
#19628 changed CSubNet for IPv4 netmasks, using the first 4 bytes of `netmask` rather than the last 4 to store the actual mask. Unfortunately, CSubNet objects are serialized on disk in banlist.dat, breaking compatibility with existing banlists (and bringing them into an inconsistent state where entries reported in `listbanned` cannot be removed).
Fix this by reverting to the old format (just for serialization). Also add a sanity check to the deserializer so that nonsensical banlist.dat entries are ignored (which would otherwise be possible if someone added IPv4 entries after #19628 but without this PR).
Reported by Greg Maxwell.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 886be97af5
vasild:
ACK 886be97af
Tree-SHA512: d3fb91e8ecd933406e527187974f22770374ee2e12a233e7870363f52ecda471fb0b7bae72420e8ff6b6b1594e3037a5115984c023dbadf38f86aeaffcd681e7
3984b78cd7 test: Add tests for CNode::ConnectedThroughNetwork (Hennadii Stepanov)
49fba9c1aa net: Add CNode::ConnectedThroughNetwork member function (Hennadii Stepanov)
d4dde24034 net: Add CNode::m_inbound_onion data member (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- adds `CNode::ConnectedThroughNetwork` member function
- is based on #19991, and only last two commits belong to it
- is required for https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/86 and #20002
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK 3984b78cd7 per `git diff 3989fcf 3984b78c`
laanwj:
Code review ACK 3984b78cd7
Tree-SHA512: 23a9c8bca8dca75113b5505fe443b294f2d42d03c98c7e34919da12d8396beb8d0ada3a58ae16e3da04b7044395f72cf9c216625afc078256cd6c897ac42bf3d
dcf0cb4776 tor: make a TORv3 hidden service instead of TORv2 (Vasil Dimov)
353a3fdaad net: advertise support for ADDRv2 via new message (Vasil Dimov)
201a4596d9 net: CAddress & CAddrMan: (un)serialize as ADDRv2 (Vasil Dimov)
1d3ec2a1fd Support bypassing range check in ReadCompactSize (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This PR contains the two remaining commits from #19031 to complete the [BIP155](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0155.mediawiki) implementation:
`net: CAddress & CAddrMan: (un)serialize as ADDRv2`
`net: advertise support for ADDRv2 via new message`
plus one more commit:
`tor: make a TORv3 hidden service instead of TORv2`
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK dcf0cb4776 per `git diff 9b56a68 dcf0cb4` only change since last review is an update to the release notes which partially picked up the suggested text. Running a node on this branch and addnode-ing to 6 other Tor v3 nodes, I see "addrv2" and "sendaddrv2" messages in getpeerinfo in both the "bytesrecv_per_msg" and "bytessent_per_msg" JSON objects.
sipa:
ACK dcf0cb4776
hebasto:
re-ACK dcf0cb4776, the node works flawlessly in all of the modes: Tor-only, clearnet-only, mixed.
laanwj:
Edit: I have to retract this ACK for now, I'm having some problems with this PR on a FreeBSD node. It drops all outgoing connections with this dcf0cb4776 merged on master (12a1c3ad1a).
ariard:
Code Review ACK dcf0cb4
Tree-SHA512: 28d4d0d817b8664d2f4b18c0e0f31579b2f0f2d23310ed213f1f436a4242afea14dfbf99e07e15889bc5c5c71ad50056797e9307ff8a90e96704f588a6171308
Introduce a new message `sendaddrv2` to signal support for ADDRv2.
Send the new message immediately after sending the `VERACK` message.
Add support for receiving and parsing ADDRv2 messages.
Send ADDRv2 messages (instead of ADDR) to a peer if he has
advertised support for it.
Co-authored-by: Carl Dong <contact@carldong.me>
Recognizing addresses from those networks allows us to accept and gossip
them, even though we don't know how to connect to them (yet).
Co-authored-by: eriknylund <erik@daychanged.com>
