Division of MuHash objects are very expensive and multiplication relatively cheap. The whole idea of introducing and tracking numerator and denominators seperately as a representation of the internal state was so that divisions would be rare. So using divison in the Remove method did not make any sense and was just a silly mistake which is corrected here.
b109bde46a [test] check that mapFlagNames is up to date (glozow)
5d3ced72f9 [test] remove unnecessary OP_1s from invalid tests (glozow)
5aee73d175 [test] minor improvements / followups (glozow)
8a365df558 [test] fix bug in ExcludeIndividualFlags (glozow)
8cac2923f5 [test] remove invalid test from tx_valid.json (glozow)
Pull request description:
This is a followup to #19698.
- There was a bug in the `ExcludeIndividualFlags` function which is fixed here.
- Fixing this bug also showed that there is a test that's supposed to fail (already existing in tx_invalid.json) in tx_valid.json, so I removed it. Other than that, the tests should all pass.
- Also implements a few suggestions I received offline: removing the `OP_1`s from the invalid tests (similar to 19db590d04), comments, and style.
- A few other small fixes, like adding asserts, putting all the flags in `mapFlagNames`, better error messages
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK b109bde46a
Tree-SHA512: 7233a8c0f1ae1172fac8000ea6e05384ecf79074c39948d118464868505c7f02f17e96503c81bd05c07adb2087648a5d93d9899e16fdefa6b7efcb51319444a9
9053b88b1c update docstring in feature_csv_activation.py (Pierre K)
Pull request description:
These changes in the test documentation reflect the changes introduced in #17921.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 9053b88
Tree-SHA512: 17fb954baded8dab1c869dd48b76b516150bae616c792c573e4114d4adfdd40195745c56570aa3050cc0015ee496acd7ec178df8ba14831dd22f9722fda84da2
bee56c78e9 rpc: Check default value type againts argument type (João Barbosa)
f81ef4303e rpc: Keep default argument value in correct type (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Store default values of RPC arguments in the corresponding type instead of a string. The value is then serialized when the help output is needed. This change simplifies #20017.
The following examples illustrates how to use the new `RPCArg::Default` and `RPCArg::DefaultHint`:
```diff
- {"verbose", RPCArg::Type::BOOL, /* default */ "false", "True for a json object, false for array of transaction ids"}
+ {"verbose", RPCArg::Type::BOOL, RPCArg::Default(false), "True for a json object, false for array of transaction ids"}
```
```diff
- {"nblocks", RPCArg::Type::NUM, /* default */ "one month", "Size of the window in number of blocks"}
+ {"nblocks", RPCArg::Type::NUM, RPCArg::DefaultHint("one month"), "Size of the window in number of blocks"}
```
No behavior change is expected.
ACKs for top commit:
LarryRuane:
ACK bee56c78e9
MarcoFalke:
ACK bee56c78e9🦅
Tree-SHA512: c47d78c918e996d36631d4ad3c933b270a34c5b446b8d736be94cf4a0a7b8c0e33d954149ec786cf9550639865b79deb6a130ad044de6030f95aac33f524293a
9a0653553a Refactor ProcessNewBlock to reduce code duplication (R E Broadley)
Pull request description:
There are probably a few issues with this code (maybe there's even a reason this code is duplicated as it currently is), so apologies in advance that I'm still a little (maybe very) bad with C++
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 9a0653553a💻
promag:
Code review ACK 9a0653553a.
theStack:
Code-review ACK 9a0653553a🌴
Tree-SHA512: f8634ffad4b2370204d1a0945db4e27248b9e579d9912784da432b8ee3303cae424fa9f7500000dcfb31e6d29d04a8f7d322d17a6fe3d4adaddd10c539458a8c
55d85834cc script: Add trusted key for hebasto (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
It is assumed that my responsibility will be limited to the [GUI repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui).
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 55d85834cc
MarcoFalke:
matches the key I have locally ACK 55d85834cc🍪
jarolrod:
ACK 55d85834cc🥃
Tree-SHA512: 256d03e108c9a14e251340ac6e91234d076778cb6bd551439182176207051f4efc55d396754867e5a7191c8c698610f92016668e163037c67dde56f4136026b8
NetPermissions::ClearFlag() is currently only called in the codebase with
an `f` value of NetPermissionFlags::PF_ISIMPLICIT.
If that should change in the future, ClearFlag() should not be called
with `f` being a subflag of a multiflag, e.g. NetPermissionFlags::PF_RELAY
or NetPermissionFlags::PF_DOWNLOAD, as that would leave `flags` in an
invalid state corresponding to none of the existing NetPermissionFlags.
Therefore, allow only calling ClearFlag with the implicit flag for now.
Co-authored-by: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
to clarify/test the relationship and NetPermissions operations
involving the NetPermissionFlags PF_NOBAN and PF_DOWNLOAD.
Co-authored-by: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
