33f5fc32e5 test: add rpc getaddressinfo labels test coverage (Jon Atack)
0f3539ac6d test: add listlabels test in wallet_labels.py (Jon Atack)
1388de8390 rpc: add getaddressinfo code documentation (Jon Atack)
2ee0cb3330 rpc: update getaddressinfo RPCExamples to bech32 (Jon Atack)
8d1ed0c263 rpc: clarify label vs labels in getaddressinfo RPCHelpman (Jon Atack)
5a0ed85070 rpc: improve getaddressinfo RPCHelpman content (Jon Atack)
70cda342cd rpc: improve getaddressinfo RPCHelpman formatting (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR is a continuation of the work in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12892.
Main motivations:
- There is currently no test coverage for the getaddressinfo `labels` response. Coverage here is a prerequisite before deprecating the `label` response or adding multiple labels per address.
- `bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` returns a few content errors, difficult-to-read formatting, and no explanation why it returns both `label` and `labels` and how they relate, which can be confusing for application developers.
Changes by order of commits:
- [x] improve/fix getaddressinfo RPCHelpman layout formatting
- [x] improve/fix getaddressinfo RPCHelpman content
- [x] clarify the `label` and `labels` fields in getaddressinfo RPCHelpman
- [x] update getaddressinfo RPCExamples addresses to bech32
- [x] add getaddressinfo code docs
- [x] add a `listlabels` test assertion in wallet_labels.py
- [x] add missing getaddressinfo `labels` test coverage and improve the existing `label` tests
Here are gists of the CLI help output:
[`bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` before this PR](https://gist.github.com/jonatack/022af5221a85c069780359a22643c810)
[`bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` after this PR](https://gist.github.com/jonatack/4ee5f6abc62a3d99269570206a5f90ba)
It seems we ought to begin a deprecation process for the getaddressinfo `label` field? If yes, I have a follow-up ready. _--> EDIT: Deprecation follow-ups #17578 and #17585 now build on this PR._
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Re-ACK 33f5fc32e5
jnewbery:
ACK 33f5fc32e5.
Tree-SHA512: a001aa863090ec2566a31059477945b1c303ebeb430b33472f8b150e420fa5742fc33bca9d95571746395b607f43f6078dd5b53e238ac1f3fc648b51c8f79a07
d0dab897af Refactor: Require scriptPubKey to get wallet SigningProvider (Andrew Chow)
4b0c718f8f Accumulate result UniValue in SignTransaction (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Easier to review ignoring whitespace:
git log -p -n1 -w
This commit does not change behavior. It passes new CScript arguments to
signing functions, but the arguments aren't currently used.
Split from #17261
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK d0dab897af
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK d0dab897af. Thanks for the SignTransaction update. No other changes since last review
Sjors:
Code review ACK d0dab897af
promag:
Code review ACK d0dab897af.
meshcollider:
Code review ACK d0dab897af
Tree-SHA512: c3f52df20fd9d6b3b5aa65562cf5f7dce7b7f44c148b0f988f8b578fce2a28e9b7bf010f5f04bb5bf60f5272b2899f1dbbfb8aee81579c21c9cba559d1d2bb70
Easier to review ignoring whitespace:
git log -p -n1 -w
This commit does not change behavior. It passes new CScript arguments to
signing functions, but the arguments aren't currently used.
SignTransaction will be called multiple times in the future. Pass
it a result UniValue so that it can accumulate the results of multiple
SignTransaction passes.
36b68de5b2 Remove getBlockDepth method from Chain::interface (Antoine Riard)
b66c429c56 Remove locked_chain from GetDepthInMainChain and its callers (Antoine Riard)
0ff03871ad Use CWallet::m_last_block_processed_height in GetDepthInMainChain (Antoine Riard)
f77b1de16f Only return early from BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain if current tip is exact match (Antoine Riard)
769ff05e48 Refactor some importprunedfunds checks with guard clause (Antoine Riard)
5971d3848e Add block_height field in struct Confirmation (Antoine Riard)
9700fcb47f Replace CWalletTx::SetConf by Confirmation initialization list (Antoine Riard)
5aacc3eff1 Add m_last_block_processed_height field in CWallet (Antoine Riard)
10b4729e33 Pass block height in Chain::BlockConnected/Chain::BlockDisconnected (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
Work starter to remove Chain::Lock interface by adding m_last_block_processed_height in CWallet and m_block_height in CMerkleTx to avoid GetDepthInMainChain having to keep a lock . Once this one done, it should ease work to wipe out more cs_main locks from wallet code.
I think it's ready for a first round of review before to get further.
- `BlockUntilSyncedToCurrent` : restrain isPotentialTip to isTip because we want to be sure that wallet see BlockDisconnected callbacks if its height differs from the Chain one. It means during a reorg, an RPC could return before the BlockDisconnected callback had been triggered. This could cause a tx that had been included in the disconnected block to be displayed as confirmed, for example.
~~- `AbandonTransaction` : in case of conflicted tx (nIndex = -1), we set its m_block_height to the one of conflicting blocks, but if this height is superior to CWallet::m_last_block_processed_height, that means tx isn't conflicted anymore so we return 0 as tx is again unconfirmed~~ After #16624, we instead rely on Confirmation.
~~- `AddToWalletIfInvolvingMe`: in case of block disconnected, transactions are added to mempool again, so we need to replace old txn in `mapWallet` with a height set to zero so we remove check on block_hash.IsNull~~ Already done in #16624
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
@jkczyz you've ACKed an intermediate commit (github annoyingly orders commits in date order, not commit order). Did you mean to ACK the final commit in this branch (36b68de5b2).
jkczyz:
> @jkczyz you've ACKed an intermediate commit (github annoyingly orders commits in date order, not commit order). Did you mean to ACK the final commit in this branch ([36b68de](36b68de5b2)).
meshcollider:
utACK 36b68de5b2
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 36b68de5b2. Changes since last review: new jkczyz refactor importprunedfunds commit, changed BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChainChanges commit title and description, changed Confirmation struct field order and line-wrapped comment
jnewbery:
utACK 36b68de5b2
promag:
Code review ACK 36b68de5b2.
Tree-SHA512: 08b89a0bcc39f67c82a6cb6aee195e6a11697770c788ba737b90986b4893f44e90d1ab9ef87239ea3766508b7e24ea882b7199df41173ab27a3d000328c14644
We don't remove yet Chain locks as we need to preserve lock
order with CWallet one until swapping at once to avoid
deadlock failures (spotted by --enable-debug)
436ad43643 Fix issue with conflicted mempool tx in listsinceblock (Adam Jonas)
Pull request description:
Closes#8752 by bringing back abandoned #10470.
This now checks that returned transactions are not conflicting with any transactions that are filtered out by the given blockhash and add a functional test to prevent this in the future.
For more context, #8757 was closed in favor of #10470.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK 436ad43643
kallewoof:
utACK 436ad43643
jonatack:
I'm not qualifed to give an ACK here but 436ad43643 appears reasonable. Built/ran tests/verified that this test fails without the change in rpcwallet.cpp:
Tree-SHA512: 63d75cd3d3f19fc84dc38899b200c96179b82b24db263cd0116ee5b715265be647157855c2e35912d2fbc49c7b37db9375d6aab0ac672f0f09bece8431de5ea9
c98bd13e67 replace asserts in RPC code with CHECK_NONFATAL and add linter (Adam Jonas)
Pull request description:
- Replace instances of assert in /rpc files and rpcwallet with CHECK_NONFATAL(condition)
- Add a linter to prevent future usage of assert being used in RPC code
ref https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17192
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK c98bd13e67 -- diff looks correct
Tree-SHA512: a16036b6bbcca73a5334665f66e17e1756377d582317568291da1d727fc9cf8c84bac9d9bd099534e1be315345336e5f7b66b93793135155f320dc5862a2d875
362ded410b Avoid using g_rpc_node global in wallet code (Russell Yanofsky)
8922d7f6b7 scripted-diff: Remove g_connman, g_banman globals (Russell Yanofsky)
e6f4f895d5 Pass NodeContext, ConnMan, BanMan references more places (Russell Yanofsky)
4d5448c76b MOVEONLY: Move NodeContext struct to node/context.h (Russell Yanofsky)
301bd41a2e scripted-diff: Rename InitInterfaces to NodeContext (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This change is mainly a naming / organization change intended to simplify #10102. It:
- Renames struct InitInterfaces to struct NodeContext and moves it from
src/init.h to src/node/context.h. This is a cosmetic change intended to make
the point of the struct more obvious.
- Gets rid of BanMan and ConnMan globals making them NodeContext members
instead. Getting rid of these globals has been talked about in past as a way
to implement testing and simulations. Making them NodeContext members is a
way of keeping them accessible without the globals.
- Splits g_rpc_interfaces global into g_rpc_node and g_rpc_chain globals. This
better separates node and wallet rpc methods. Node RPC methods should have
access NodeContext, while wallet RPC methods should only have indirect access
to node functionality via interfaces::Chain.
- Adds NodeContext& references to interfaces::Chain class and the
interfaces::MakeChain() function. This is needed to access ConnMan and BanMan
instances without the globals.
- Gets rid of redundant Node and Chain instances in Qt tests. This is
needed due to the previous MakeChain change, and also makes test setup a
little more straightforward. More cleanup could be done in the future, but it
will require deduplication of bitcoind, bitcoin-qt, and TestingSetup init
code.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 362ded410b
Tree-SHA512: 9ae6ff1e33423291d1e52056bac95e0874538390892a6e83c4c115b3c73155a8827c0191b46eb3d14e3b3f6c23ccb08095490880fbc3188026319c71739f7db2
Wallet code should use interfaces::Chain and not directly access to node state.
Add a g_rpc_chain replacement global for wallet code to use, and move
g_rpc_node definition to a libbitcoin_server source file so there are link
errors if wallet code tries to access it.
listsinceblock now checks that returned transactions are not
conflicting with any transactions that are filtered out by
the given blockhash
Co-Authored-By: Michael Chrostowski <michael.chrostowski@gmail.com>
This moves CWallet members and methods dealing with keys to a new
LegacyScriptPubKeyMan class, and updates calling code to reference the new
class instead of CWallet.
Most of the changes are simple text replacements and variable substitutions
easily verified with:
git log -p -n1 -U0 --word-diff-regex=.
The only nontrivial chunk of code added is the new LegacyScriptPubKeyMan class
declaration, but this code isn't new and is just selectively copied and moved
from the previous CWallet class declaration. This can be verified with:
git log -p -n1 --color-moved=dimmed_zebra src/wallet/scriptpubkeyman.h src/wallet/wallet.h
or
git diff HEAD~1:src/wallet/wallet.h HEAD:src/wallet/scriptpubkeyman.h
This commit does not change behavior.
9e95931865 [wallet] Remove `state` argument from CWallet::CommitTransaction (John Newbery)
d1734f9a3b [wallet] Remove return value from CommitTransaction() (John Newbery)
b6f486a02b [wallet] Add doxygen comment to CWallet::CommitTransaction() (John Newbery)
8bba91b22d [wallet] Fix whitespace in CWallet::CommitTransaction() (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
`CommitTransaction()` returns a bool to indicate success, but since commit
b3a7410 (#9302) it only returns true, even if the transaction was not
successfully broadcast. This commit changes CommitTransaction() to return
void.
All dead code in `if (!CommitTransaction())` branches has been removed.
Two additional commits fix up the idiosyncratic whitespace in `CommitTransaction` and add a doxygen comment for the function.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 9e95931865
Tree-SHA512: a55a2c20369a45222fc0e02d0891495655a926e71c4f52cb72624768dd7b9c1dca716ea67d38420afb90f40c6e0fd448caa60c18fd693bb10ecb110b641820e6
facec1c643 wallet: Avoid showing GUI popups on RPC errors (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
RPC errors and warnings are shown as popups in the GUI instead of being returned to the RPC caller. For example,
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli loadwallet $(pwd)/./test/functional/data/wallets/high_minversion/
error code: -4
error message:
Wallet loading failed.
```
gives me a GUI popup and no reason why loading the wallet failed.
After this pull request:
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli loadwallet $(pwd)/./test/functional/data/wallets/high_minversion/
error code: -4
error message:
Wallet loading failed: Error loading /home/marco/workspace/btc_bitcoin_core/./test/functional/data/wallets/high_minversion/wallet.dat: Wallet requires newer version of Bitcoin Core
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK facec1c643
Tree-SHA512: c8274bbb02cfcf71676eeec1e773e51fb3538cf93f82e7cb8536f4716d44ed819cdc162dfc039ac7386a4db381a734cdb27fd32567043a1180c02519fbcba194
CommitTransaction returns a bool to indicate success, but since commit
b3a74100b8 it only returns true, even if the transaction was not
successfully broadcast. This commit changes CommitTransaction() to return
void.
All dead code in `if (!CommitTransaction())` branches has been removed.
Fields involvesWatchonly, generated, walletconflicts were missing
in result description of listtransactions, listsinceblock,
gettransaction
Align getttransaction fields which were odd compare to other rpc
helpers
c812aba394 test bumpfee fee_rate argument (ezegom)
9f25de3d9e rpc bumpfee check fee_rate argument (ezegom)
88e5f997df rpc bumpfee: add fee_rate argument (ezegom)
1a4c791cf4 rpc bumpfee: move feerate estimation logic into separate method (ezegom)
Pull request description:
Taking over for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16492 which seems to have gone inactive.
Only minor commit cleanups, rebase, and some help text fixes on top of previous PR. Renamed `feeRate` to `fee_rate` to reflect updated guidelines.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
Code review ACK c812aba
laanwj:
ACK c812aba394
Tree-SHA512: 5f7f51bd780a573ccef1ccd72b0faf3e5d143f6551060a667560c5163f7d9480e17e73775d1d7bcac0463f3b6b4328f0cff7b27e39483bddc42a530f4583ce30
PR 16866 renamed the 'decode' argument in gettransaction to 'verbose' to make it more consistent with other RPC calls like getrawtransaction.
However, it seems it inadvertently overloaded the 'details' fields when 'verbose' is passed. The result is that the original 'details' fields are no longer returned, which seems to be a breaking API change.
This PR takes the simplest path to restoring the 'details' fields by renaming them from 'details' back to 'decoded', while leaving the 'verbose' argument for API consistency.
It also addresses [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16185#discussion_r320740413) to mention that the 'decoded' field is identical to decoderawtransaction.
Update the RPC help, functional test, and release note.
This makes the RPC method consistent with other RPC methods that have a
'verbose' option.
Change the name of the return object from 'decoded' to details.
Update help text.
39034f1ee6 Refactor rawtransaction_util's SignTransaction to have previous tx parsing be separate (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently the `SignTransaction` function has to handle both the actual signing and parsing of previous transaction data. This PR splits it so that `SignTransaction` only handles the signing itself and adds a `ParsePrevouts` function which handles parsing the prevtx information.
This allows for `SignTransaction` to just take any `SigningProvider`.
Split from #16341
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 39034f1ee6
instagibbs:
utACK 39034f1ee6
ryanofsky:
utACK 39034f1ee6. No change since previously reviewed b49bbb939be92a67ff77c3f7bca5bb94dd141906, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16341#pullrequestreview-278610269 other than rebase with no conflicts.
Tree-SHA512: 09f7733e90691766bfb5cf0f20e913dbf270bd3b51abdcad966b24d110e562ed85fd3d0d1d7bbea61f903340060052ec73c4817b09aee0dc1f3916d781a9e40c
442a87cc0a Add a test wallet_reorgsrestore (Antoine Riard)
40ede992d9 Modify wallet tx status if has been reorged out (Antoine Riard)
7e89994133 Remove SyncTransaction for conflicted txn in CWallet::BlockConnected (Antoine Riard)
a31be09bfd Encapsulate tx status in a Confirmation struct (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
While working on #15931, I've tried to rationalize tx state management to ease integration of block height tracking per-wallet tx. We currently rely on a combination of `hashBlock` and `nIndex` with magic value to determine tx confirmation, conflicted or abandoned state. It's hard to reason and error-prone. To solve that, we encapsulate these fields in a `TxConfirmation` struct and introduce a `TxState` member that we update accordingly at block connection/disconnection.
Following jnewbery [recommendation](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15931#discussion_r312576506), I've taken these changes in its own commit, and open a PR to get them first. It would ease review of aforementioned PR, but above all should ease fixing of long-term issues like :
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/7315 (but maybe we should abandon abandontransaction or relieve it to only free outpoints not track the transaction as abandoned in itself, need its own discussion)
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8692 where we should cancel conflicted state of transactions chain smoothly
* `MarkConflicted` in `LoadToWallet` is likely useless if we track conflicts rights at block connection
Main changes of this PR to get right are tx update in `AddToWallet` and serialization/deserialization logic.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
Light re-Code Review ACK 442a87cc0a
ryanofsky:
utACK 442a87cc0a. Changes since last review are switching from `hasChain` to `LockChain` and removing chain lock in `WalletBatch::LoadWallet` that's redundant with the new lock still added in `CWallet::LoadWallet`, and fixing python test race condition.
Tree-SHA512: 029209e006de0240436817204e69e548c5665e2b0721b214510e7aba7eba130a5eab441d3a1ad95bd6426114dd27390492c77bf4560a9610009b32cd0a1f72f7
This adds a new boolean parameter 'decode' to the gettransaction call, which, if set to true, add a 'decoded' field to the result containing the decoded transaction
Instead of relying on combination of hashBlock and nIndex
values to manage tx in its lifecycle, we introduce 4
status : CONFIRMED, UNCONFIRMED, CONFLICTED, ABANDONED.
hashBlock and nIndex magic values should only be used at
serialization/deserialization for backward-compatibility.
At block disconnection, we know flag txn as UNCONFIRMED where
previously they kept their states until being override by a
block connection or abandontransaction call. This is a change
in behavior for which user may have to call abandon twice
if transaction is disconnected and not accepted back in the mempool.
We assert status transitioning right in AddToWallet. Doing so
flagged a misbehavior in ComputeTimeSmart unit test where same
tx is confirmed twice in different block. To avoid inconsistencies
we unconfirmed tx before new connection in different block. We
also remove a cs_main lock in test, as AddToWallet and its
callees don't rely on locked chain.
72eaab073b tests: functional watch-only wallet tests (William Casarin)
72ffbdc579 doc: add release note for include_watchonly default changes (William Casarin)
003a3c73c0 rpcwallet: document include_watchonly default for watchonly wallets (William Casarin)
a50d9e6c0b rpcwallet: default include_watchonly to true for watchonly wallets (William Casarin)
Pull request description:
Right now it's a bit annoying to deal with watchonly wallets, many rpc commands have an `include_watchonly` argument that needs to be explicitly set.
Wallets created with `createwallet` can have a `disable_private_keys` parameter, for those wallets we already know that they are watchonly, so there's no reason to have to explicitly ask for it for every command. Instead we check this wallet flag when the `include_watchonly` parameter isn't set.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Code review ACK 72eaab073b
Sjors:
ACK 72eaab073b
promag:
ACK 72eaab073b, code review only, didn't look closely to the test.
kallewoof:
ACK 72eaab073b
fanquake:
ACK 72eaab073b - I've looked over the changes, they make sense to me. Compiled and ran the tests etc.
Tree-SHA512: d3646b55e97f386594d7efc994f0712f3888475c6a5dc7f131ac9f8c49bf5d4677182b88f42b34152abe1ad101ecadd152b4c20e9d3c1267190db36f77ab8bd7
RPC server starts in warmup mode, it can't
process yet calls, then follows connection manager
initialization and finally RPC server get out of
warmup mode. RPC calls shouldn't be able to get
P2P disabled errors because once we initialize
g_connman it's not unset until shutdown, after
RPC server has been stopped.
d6b3640ac7 [test] walletcreatefundedpsbt: check RBF is disabled when -walletrbf=0 (Sjors Provoost)
9ed062b568 [doc] rpc: remove "fallback to" from RBF default help (Sjors Provoost)
4fcb698bc2 [rpc] walletcreatefundedpsbt: use wallet default RBF (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
The `walletcreatefundedpsbt` RPC call currently ignores `-walletrbf` and defaults to not use RBF. This PR fixes that.
This PR also replaces UniValue in `ConstructTransaction` with a `bool` in preparation of moving this helper method out of the RPC codebase entirely. This may be a bit overkill, but does slightly simplify it.
Fixes#15878
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Code Review ACK d6b3640ac7
l2a5b1:
re-ACK d6b3640
MarcoFalke:
ACK d6b3640ac7
Tree-SHA512: 55b9bccd1ef36b54f6b34793017dc0721103099ad3761b3b04862291ee13d6915915d4dbb1a8567924fa56e5e95dfe10eec070e06701610e70c87f8ea92b2a00
