Currently, the test is passing due to a mistake in the test inputs
selection process. We are selecting the parent transaction change
output as one of the inputs of the transaction to fund, which
helps to surpass the target amount when it shouldn't due to the
fee reduction.
The failure arises when the test behaves as intended by its coder;
that is, when it does not select the change output. In this case,
the pre-selected inputs aren't enough to cover the target amount.
Fix this by excluding the parent transaction's change output from
the inputs selection and including an extra input to cover the tx
fee.
8789dc8f31 doc: Add note to getblockfrompeer on missing undo data (Fabian Jahr)
4a1975008b rpc: Make pruneheight also reflect undo data presence (Fabian Jahr)
96b4facc91 refactor, blockstorage: Generalize GetFirstStoredBlock (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
The function `GetFirstStoredBlock()` helps us find the first block for which we have data. So far this function only looked for a block with `BLOCK_HAVE_DATA`. However, this doesn't mean that we also have the undo data of that block, and undo data might be required for what a user would like to do with those blocks. One example of how this might happen is if some blocks were fetched using the `getblockfrompeer` RPC. Blocks fetched from a peer will have data but no undo data.
The first commit here allows `GetFirstStoredBlock()` to check for undo data as well by passing a parameter. This alone is useful for #29553 and I would use it there.
In the second commit I am applying the undo check to the RPCs that report `pruneheight` to the user. I find this much more intuitive because I think the user expects to be able to do all operations on blocks up until the `pruneheight` but that is not the case if undo data is missing. I personally ran into this once before and now again when testing for assumeutxo when I had used `getblockfrompeer`. The following commit adds test coverage for this change of behavior.
The last commit adds a note in the docs of `getblockfrompeer` that undo data will not be available.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 8789dc8f31
furszy:
Code review ACK 8789dc8f31.
stickies-v:
ACK 8789dc8f31
Tree-SHA512: 90ae8bdd07a496ade579aa25240609c61c9ed173ad38d30533f6c631fe674e5a41727478ade69ca4b71a571ad94c9da4b33ebba6b5d8821109313c2de3bdfb3d
5b7f70ba26 test: loadtxoutset in divergent chain with less work (Alfonso Roman Zubeldia)
d35efe1efc p2p: Start downloading historical blocks from common ancestor (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a test to cover the scenario of loading an assumeutxo snapshot when the current chain tip is not an ancestor of the snapshot block but has less work.
During the review process, a bug was discovered where blocks between the last common ancestor and the background tip were not being requested if the background tip was not an ancestor of the snapshot block. mzumsande suggested a fix (65343ec49a6b73c4197dfc38e1c2f433b0a3838a) to start downloading historical blocks from the last common ancestor to address this issue. This fix has been incorporated into the PR with a slight modification.
Related to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28648
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tACK 5b7f70ba26
achow101:
ACK 5b7f70ba26
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 5b7f70ba26
Tree-SHA512: f8957349686a6a1292165ea9e0fd8c912d21466072632a10f8ef9d852a5f430bc6b2a531e6884a4dbf2e3adb28b3d512b25919e78f5804a67320ef54c3b1aaf6
d93b794709 tests: improve wallet multisig descriptor test and docs (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
It is best to store all key origin information
(master key fingerprint and all derivation steps)
in the multisig descriptor. Being explicit with
this information should be beneficial if this approach is used with other wallets/signers (whether hardware or software). There is no harm including all of this with xpubs (if anything it simplifies the test code) and makes this example/docs more complete and safer incase it is referenced by others.
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
Code Review ACK d93b794709
achow101:
ACK d93b794709
Tree-SHA512: 0e5c4d13f060489405e6cf50c8a09911f5a0cee71023649235afd80a5e3aae38d52c6e12ad4660205b9357b09f45596941391bdcf6fceccbe07c4e5a1592a482
c9dacd958d test: Check that non empty version packet is ignored and no disconnection happens (stratospher)
997cc00b95 test: Check that disconnection happens when AAD isn't filled (stratospher)
b5e6238fdb test: Check that disconnection happens when garbage sent/received are different (stratospher)
ad1482d5a2 test: Check that disconnection happens when wrong garbage terminator is sent (stratospher)
e351576862 test: Check that disconnection happens when >4095 garbage bytes is sent (stratospher)
e075fd131d test: Introduce test types and modify v2 handshake function accordingly (stratospher)
7d07daa623 log: Add V2 handshake timeout (stratospher)
d4a1da8543 test: Make global TRANSPORT_VERSION variable an instance variable (stratospher)
c642b08c4e test: Log when the garbage is actually sent to transport layer (stratospher)
86cca2cba2 test: Support disconnect waiting for add_p2p_connection (stratospher)
bf9669af9c test: Rename early key response test and move random_bitflip to util (stratospher)
Pull request description:
Add tests for the following v2 handshake scenarios:
1. Disconnection happens when > `MAX_GARBAGE_LEN` bytes garbage is sent
2. Disconnection happens when incorrect garbage terminator is sent
3. Disconnection happens when garbage bytes are tampered with
4. Disconnection happens when AAD of first encrypted packet after the garbage terminator is not filled
5. bitcoind ignores non-empty version packet and no disconnection happens
All these tests require a modified v2 P2P class (different from `EncryptedP2PState` used in `v2_p2p.py`) to implement our custom handshake behaviour based on different scenarios and have been kept in a single test file (`test/functional/p2p_v2_misbehaving.py`). Shifted the test in `test/functional/p2p_v2_earlykeyresponse.py` which is of the same pattern to this file too.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK c9dacd958d
mzumsande:
ACK c9dacd958d
theStack:
Code-review ACK c9dacd958d
Tree-SHA512: 90df81f0c7f4ecf0a47762d290a618ded92cde9f83d3ef3cc70e1b005ecb16125ec39a9d80ce95f99e695d29abd63443240cb5490aa57c5bc8fa2e52149a0672
de71d4dece fuzz: improve utxo_snapshot target (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
Add the possibility of giving more guidance to the creation of the metadata and/or coins, so that the fuzzer gets the chance
to reach more error conditions in ActivateSnapshot and sometimes successfully creates a valid snapshot.
This also changes the asserts for the success case that were outdated (after #29370) and only didn't result in a crash because the fuzzer wasn't able to reach this code before.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
re-ACK de71d4dece🎆
fjahr:
utACK de71d4dece
TheCharlatan:
ACK de71d4dece
Tree-SHA512: 346974d594164544d8cd3df7d8362c905fd93116215e9f5df308dfdac55bab04d727bfd7fd001cf11318682d11ee329b4b4a43308124c04d64b67840ab8a58a0
9e13ccc50e psbt: Check non witness utxo outpoint early (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
A common issue that our fuzzers keep finding is that outpoints don't exist in the non witness utxos. Instead of trying to track this down and checking in various individual places, do the check early during deserialization. This also unifies the error message returned for this class of problems.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 9e13ccc50e
S3RK:
tACK 9e13ccc50e
dergoegge:
utACK 9e13ccc50e
Tree-SHA512: 81b8055b146c6358052226578ddfec0ae5bd877968c7f4f62dc3d6a684545ea568f37c7f1bd619918441af9e453ba8b26531a2280d218da37fa15480f1b45d0e
Add the possibility of giving more guidance to the creation of the
metadata and/or coins, so that the fuzzer gets the chance
to reach more error conditions in ActivateSnapshot and sometimes
successfully creates a valid snapshot.
This also changes the asserts for the success case that were outdated,
and only didn't result in a crash because the fuzzer wasn't able
to reach this code before.
This test checks that we can successfully process PSBTs and opt out of
finalization.
Previously trying to call `walletprocesspsbt` would attempt to
auto-finalize (as a convenience), and would not permit opt-out of
finalization, instead aborting via `CHECK_NONFATAL`.
2342b46c45 test: Add coverage for getchaintxstats in assumeutxo context (Fabian Jahr)
faf2a6750b rpc: Reorder getchaintxstats output (MarcoFalke)
fa2dada0c9 rpc: Avoid getchaintxstats invalid results (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `getchaintxstats` RPC reply during AU background download may return non-zero, but invalid, values for `window_tx_count` and `txrate`.
For example, `txcount` may be zero for a to-be-downloaded block, but may be non-zero for an ancestor block which is already downloaded. Thus, the values returned may be negative (and cause intermediate integer sanitizer violations).
Also, `txcount` may be accurate for the snapshot base block, or a descendant of it. However it may be zero for an ancestor block that still needs to be downloaded. Thus, the values returned may be positive, but wrong.
Fix all issues by skipping the returned value if either `txcount` is unset (equal to zero).
Also, skip `txcount` in the returned value, if it is unset (equal to zero).
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29328
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
re-ACK 2342b46c45
achow101:
ACK 2342b46c45
mzumsande:
ACK 2342b46c45
Tree-SHA512: 931cecc40ee5dc0f96be728db7eb297155f8343076cd29c8b8c050c99fd1d568b80f54c9459a34ca7a9489c2474c729796d00eeb1934d6a9f7b4d6a53e3ec430
926b8e39dc [doc] add release note for TRUC (glozow)
19a9b90617 use version=3 instead of v3 in debug strings (glozow)
881fac8e60 scripted-diff: change names from V3 to TRUC (glozow)
a573dd2617 [doc] replace mentions of v3 with TRUC (glozow)
089b5757df rename mempool_accept_v3.py to mempool_truc.py (glozow)
f543852a89 rename policy/v3_policy.* to policy/truc_policy.* (glozow)
Pull request description:
Adds a release note for TRUC policy which will be live in v28.0.
For clarity, replaces mentions of "v3" with "TRUC" in most places. Suggested in
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29496#discussion_r1629749583
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29496#discussion_r1624500904
I changed error strings from "v3-violation" to "TRUC-violation" but left v3 in the debug strings because I think it might be clearer for somebody who is debugging. Similarly, I left some variables unchanged because I think they're more descriptive this way, e.g. `tx_v3_from_v2_and_v3`. I'm happy to debate places that should or shouldn't be documented differently in this PR, whatever is clearest to everyone.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK 926b8e39dc
achow101:
ACK 926b8e39dc
ismaelsadeeq:
Code review ACK 926b8e39dc
Tree-SHA512: 16c88add0a29dc6d1236c4d45f34a17b850f6727b231953cbd52eb9f7268d1d802563eadfc8b7928c94ed3d7a615275dd103e57e81439ebf3ba2b12efa1e42af
2f9bde69f4 test: Remove unnecessary restart in assumeutxo test (Fabian Jahr)
19ce3d407e assumeutxo: Check snapshot base block is not marked invalid (Fabian Jahr)
80315c0118 refactor: Move early loadtxoutset checks into ActiveSnapshot (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
This was discovered in a discussion in #29996
If the base block of the snapshot is marked invalid or part of an invalid chain, we currently still load the snapshot and get stuck in a weird state where we have the snapshot chainstate but it will never connect to our valid chain.
While this scenario is highly unlikely to occur on mainnet, it still seems good to prevent this inconsistent state.
The behavior change described above is in the second commit.
The first commit refactors the early checks in the `loadtxoutset` RPC by moving them into `ActivateSnapshot()` in order to have the chance to cover them by unit tests in the future and have a more consistent interface. Previously checks were spread out between `rpc/blockchain.cpp` and `validation.cpp`. In order to be able to return the error message to users of the RPC, the return type of `ActivateSnapshot()` is changed from `bool` to `util::Result`.
The third commit removes an unnecessary restart introduced in #29428.
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
re-ACK 2f9bde6
alfonsoromanz:
Re-ACK 2f9bde69f4. The RPC code looks much cleaner after the refactor. Also, it seems very useful to get the error message in the RPC response rather than having to rely on the logs in some scenarios if you are an RPC user.
achow101:
ACK 2f9bde69f4
Tree-SHA512: 5328dd88c3c7be3f1be97c9eef52ac3666c27188c30a798b3e949f3ffcb83be075127c107e4046f7f39f961a79911ea3d61b61f3c11e451b3e4c541c264eeed4
8ec24bdad8 test: Added coverage to Block not found error using gettxoutsetinfo (kevkevinpal)
Pull request description:
#### Description
There were no tests that checked for the `Block not found` error called in `ParseHashOrHeight` when using `gettxoutsetinfo`, this change adds coverage to it.
You can see there are no tests that do the following by doing the below
`grep -nri "Block not found.*gettxoutsetinfo" ./test/functional/`
which leads to no results
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 8ec24bdad8
tdb3:
ACK 8ec24bdad8
kristapsk:
ACK 8ec24bdad8
brunoerg:
crACK 8ec24bdad8
alfonsoromanz:
Re ACK 8ec24bdad8
Tree-SHA512: 2c61c681e7304c679cc3d7dd13af1b795780e85716c25c7423d68104e253d01271e048e21bc21be35dbc7ec1a4fde94e439542f3cfd669fe5a16478c5fa982ab
e38eadb2c2 test: change comments to `self.log.info` for `test_addnode_getaddednodeinfo` (brunoerg)
c838e3b610 test: add coverage for `node` field of `getaddednodeinfo` RPC (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
We currently do not test a successful call to `getaddednodeinfo` filtering by `node`, we only test it with an unknown address and checks whether it fails. This PR adds coverage to it.
ACKs for top commit:
kevkevinpal:
ACK [e38eadb](e38eadb2c2)
achow101:
ACK e38eadb2c2
tdb3:
re ACK e38eadb2c2
BrandonOdiwuor:
Code Review ACK e38eadb2c2
rkrux:
tACK [e38eadb](e38eadb2c2)
Tree-SHA512: e9f768b7aa86e58b0b0ced089ead57040ff9a5204493da1ab99c8bc897b6dcdce7c856855f74c52010fceef19af1e12a39eee9f8f2e7294b42476b6f980fe754
In the Tor case, this prevents us from telling the Tor daemon to send
our incoming connections from the Tor network to an address where we
do not listen (we tried to listen but failed probably because another
application is already listening).
In the other cases (IPv4/IPv6 binds) this also prevents unpleasant
surprises caused by continuing operations even on bind failure. For
example, another application may be listening on portX, bitcoind tries
to bind on portX and portY, only succeeds with portY and continues
operation leaving the user thinking that his bitcoind is listening on
portX whereas another application is listening (the error message in
the log could easily be missed).
Avoid having the functional testing framework start multiple `bitcoind`s
that try to listen on the same `127.0.0.1:18445` (Tor listen for
regtest) if `bind_to_localhost_only` is set to `False`.
Also fix a typo in `test-shell.md` related to `bind_to_localhost_only`.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22727
If only `-bind=addr:port` is given (without `-bind=...=onion`) then we
would bind to `addr:port` _and_ to `127.0.0.1:8334` in addition which
may be unexpected, assuming the semantic of `-bind=addr:port` is
"bind _only_ to `addr:port`".
Change the above to not do the additional bind: if only
`-bind=addr:port` is given (without `-bind=...=onion`) then bind to
`addr:port` (only). If we are creating a Tor hidden service then use
`addr:port` as target (same behavior as before
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19991).
This allows disabling binding on the onion port.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22726
Keep mentions of v3 in debug strings to help people who might not know
that TRUC is applied when version=3.
Also keep variable names in tests, as it is less verbose to keep v3 and v2.
The migration process reloads the wallet after all failures.
This commit tests the behavior by trying to obtain a new address
after a decryption failure during migration.
The "connect to ourself" detection logic has been first introduced
by Satoshi in October 2009, together with a couple of other changes
and a version bump to "v0.1.6 BETA" (see commit
cc0b4c3b62).
73f0a6cbd0 doc: detail -rpccookieperms option (willcl-ark)
d2afa2690c test: add rpccookieperms test (willcl-ark)
f467aede78 init: add option for rpccookie permissions (willcl-ark)
7df03f1a92 util: add perm string helper functions (willcl-ark)
Pull request description:
This PR picks up #26088 by aureleoules which adds a bitcoind launch option `-rpccookieperms` to set the file permissions of the cookie generated by bitcoin core.
Example usage to make the generated cookie group-readable: `./src/bitcoind -rpccookieperms=group`.
Accepted values for `-rpccookieperms` are `[owner|group|all]`. We let `fs::perms` handle platform-specific permissions changes.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 73f0a6cbd0
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 73f0a6cbd0. Main change since last review is no longer throwing a skip exception in the rpc test on windows, so other checks can run after it, and overall test result is passing, not skipped. Also were clarifying renames and documentation improvements.
tdb3:
cr ACK 73f0a6cbd0
Tree-SHA512: e800d59a44aca10e1c58ca69bf3fdde9f6ccf5eab4b7b962645af6d6bc0cfa3a357701e409c8c60d8d7744fcd33a91e77ada11790aa88cd7811ef60fab86ab11
This allows a transaction's weight to be bound under a certain
weight if possible and desired. This can be beneficial for future
RBF attempts, or whenever a more restricted spend topology is
desired.
Co-authored-by: Greg Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com>
72b226882f wallet: notify when preset + automatic inputs exceed max weight (furszy)
Pull request description:
Small change. Found it while finishing my review on #29523. This does not interfere with it.
Basically, we are erroring out early when the automatic coin selection process exceeds the maximum weight, but we are not doing so when the user-preselected inputs combined with the wallet-selected inputs exceed the maximum weight.
This change avoids signing all inputs before erroring out and introduces test coverage for `fundrawtransaction`.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 72b226882f
tdb3:
re ACK for 72b226882f
rkrux:
tACK [72b2268](72b226882f)
ismaelsadeeq:
utACK 72b226882f
Tree-SHA512: d77be19231023383a9c79a5d66b642dcbc6ebfc31a363e0b9f063c44898720a7859ec211cdbc0914ac7a3bfdf15e52fb8fc20d97f171431f70492c0f159dbc36
a9716c53f0 rpc: call IsInitialBlockDownload via miner interface (Sjors Provoost)
dda0b0834f rpc: minize getTipHash() calls in gbt (Sjors Provoost)
7b4d3249ce rpc: call processNewBlock via miner interface (Sjors Provoost)
9e228351e7 rpc: getTransactionsUpdated via miner interface (Sjors Provoost)
64ebb0f971 Always pass options to BlockAssembler constructor (Sjors Provoost)
4bf2e361da rpc: call CreateNewBlock via miner interface (Sjors Provoost)
404b01c436 rpc: getblocktemplate getTipHash() via Miner interface (Sjors Provoost)
d8a3496b5a rpc: call TestBlockValidity via miner interface (Sjors Provoost)
8ecb681678 Introduce Mining interface (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Introduce a `Mining` interface for the `getblocktemplate`, `generateblock` and other mining RPCs to use now, and for Stratum v2 to use later.
Suggested here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29346#issuecomment-2108528652
The selection of methods added to the interface is mostly based on what the Template Provider in #29432 uses. It could be expanded further so that `rpc/mining.cpp` no longer needs `EnsureMemPool` and `EnsureChainman`.
This PR should be a pure refactor.
ACKs for top commit:
tdb3:
re ACK a9716c53f0
itornaza:
Code review and std-tests ACK a9716c53f0
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK a9716c53f0 with one minor suggestion in case you update. Only changes since last review were other small changes to the interface.
Tree-SHA512: cf97f87d6e9ed89da3835a0730da3b24a7b14c8605ea221149103a5915e79598cf082a95f2bc88e33f1c450e3d4aad88aed1163a29195acca88bcace055af724
This test type is represented using SEND_NO_AAD. If AAD of the first encrypted packet
sent after the garbage terminator (optional decoy packet/version packet) hasn't been
filled, disconnection happens.
This test type is represented using WRONG_GARBAGE.
Here, garbage bytes sent to TestNode are assumed to be tampered with and
do not correspond to the garbage bytes which P2PInterface calculated and
uses.
This test type is represented using WRONG_GARBAGE_TERMINATOR.
since the wrong garbage terminator is sent to TestNode, TestNode
will interpret all of the gabage bytes, wrong garbage terminator,
decoy messages and version packet it receives as garbage bytes.
If the length of all these is more than 4095 + 16, it will result
in a missing garbage terminator error. otherwise, it will result
in a V2 handshake timeout error.
Send only MAX_GARBAGE_LEN//2 bytes of garbage data to TestNode
so that the total length received by the TestNode is at max
= (MAX_GARBAGE_LEN//2) + 16 + 10*120 + 20 = 3283 bytes
(which is less than 4095 + 16 bytes) and we get a consistent
V2 handshake timeout error message.
If we do not limit the garbage length sent, we will intermittently
get both missing garbage terminator error and V2 handshake
timeout error based on the garbage length and decoy packets length
which are chosen at random.
