5deb0b024e build, test, doc: Temporarily remove Android-related stuff (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Previously, our Android builds were geared towards generating APKs, which relied on Qt. However, after migrating to C++20, compiling for Android became unfeasible due to Qt 5.15's compatibility limitations with NDK only up to r25, which includes an outdated embedded libc++ (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29360).
All removed stuff will be reinstated after migrating the build system to CMake and upgrading Qt to version 6.x.
This PR makes possible a clean migration to the CMake-based build system as it removes code, which is not used at this moment.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK 5deb0b024e
fanquake:
ACK 5deb0b024e - given none of this is currently tested/wont compile. Can be revisted in future.
Tree-SHA512: 3bc2ccfe881e11cc1d78c27acd6f1d86cfba86821ef3bb5eca2e80d978fdfa13659ec82284dcaadc507e2394524dea91d4b8f81d0030c1cef9708df8be76bf07
2fd34ba504 Add sanity checks for various ATMPArgs booleans (Greg Sanders)
20d8936d8b [refactor] make some members MemPoolAccept-wide (glozow)
cbbfe719b2 cpfp carveout is excluded in packages (glozow)
69f7ab05ba Add m_allow_sibling_eviction as separate ATMPArgs flag (Greg Sanders)
57ee3029dd Add description for m_test_accept (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
First few commits of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28984 to set the stage for the package RBF logic.
These refactors are preparation for evaluating an RBF in a multi-proposed-transaction context instead of only a single proposed transaction. Also, carveouts and sibling evictions only should work in single RBF cases so add logic to preclude multi-tx cases in the future.
No behavior changes aside from bailing earlier from failed carve-outs.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
reACK 2fd34ba504 via range-diff
sr-gi:
utACK [2fd34ba](2fd34ba504)
theStack:
re-ACK 2fd34ba504
Tree-SHA512: 5071c5b8d9b8d2c9faa278c8c4df31de288cb407a68e4d55544c588caff6c86160cce7825453549c6ed69e29d9ccb5ee2d4a518b18f563bfb12f2ced073fe42a
84900ac34f doc: add release-notes-27064.md (Matthew Zipkin)
855dd8d592 system: use %LOCALAPPDATA% as default datadir on windows (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/2391
This PR changes the default datadir location on Windows from `C:\Users\Username\AppData\Roaming\Bitcoin` to `C:\Users\Username\AppData\Local\Bitcoin`. This change only applies to fresh installs. To preserve backwards compatibility, on startup we check for the existence of `C:\Users\Username\AppData\Roaming\Bitcoin\chainstate` and if it is there, we continue using the "Roaming" directory as the default datadir location.
[Note that in Windows 11 this change may be moot:](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/uwp/api/windows.storage.applicationdata.roamingfolder?view=winrt-22621)
> Roaming data and settings is no longer supported as of Windows 11. The recommended replacement is [Azure App Service](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/). Azure App Service is widely supported, well documented, reliable, and supports cross-platform/cross-ecosystem scenarios such as iOS, Android and web. Settings stored here no longer roam (as of Windows 11), but the settings store is still available.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 84900ac34f
BenWestgate:
crACK 84900ac34f
hebasto:
re-ACK 84900ac34f, only addressed feedback since my recent [review](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27064#pullrequestreview-2028718273).
Tree-SHA512: 807c6e89571287e2c8f4934229aec91ef28e7d0a675234acf1b7d085c24c7b73a08b6e345fbfc9038e6239187b6b69c08490ddaa1c057de5ea975c4a000bba42
The behavior is not new, but this rule exits earlier than before.
Previously, a carve out could have been granted in PreChecks() but then
nullified in PackageMempoolChecks() when CheckPackageLimits() is called
with the default limits.
It is best to store all key origin information
(master key fingerprint and all derivation steps)
in the multisig descriptor. Being explicit with
this information should be beneficial if this approach
is used with other wallets/signers (whether hardware
or software). There is no harm including all of this
with xpubs (if anything it simplifies the test code)
and makes this example/docs more complete and safer
incase it is referenced by others.
cbc6c440e3 doc: add comments and release-notes for JSON-RPC 2.0 (Matthew Zipkin)
e7ee80dcf2 rpc: JSON-RPC 2.0 should not respond to "notifications" (Matthew Zipkin)
bf1a1f1662 rpc: Avoid returning HTTP errors for JSON-RPC 2.0 requests (Matthew Zipkin)
466b90562f rpc: Add "jsonrpc" field and drop null "result"/"error" fields (Matthew Zipkin)
2ca1460ae3 rpc: identify JSON-RPC 2.0 requests (Matthew Zipkin)
a64a2b77e0 rpc: refactor single/batch requests (Matthew Zipkin)
df6e3756d6 rpc: Avoid copies in JSONRPCReplyObj() (Matthew Zipkin)
09416f9ec4 test: cover JSONRPC 2.0 requests, batches, and notifications (Matthew Zipkin)
4202c170da test: refactor interface_rpc.py (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/2960
Bitcoin Core's JSONRPC server behaves with a special blend of 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0 behaviors. This introduces compliance issues with more strict clients. There are the major misbehaviors that I found:
- returning non-200 HTTP codes for RPC errors like "Method not found" (this is not a server error or an HTTP error)
- returning both `"error"` and `"result"` fields together in a response object.
- different error-handling behavior for single and batched RPC requests (batches contain errors in the response but single requests will actually throw HTTP errors)
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15495 added regression tests after a discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15381 to kinda lock in our RPC behavior to preserve backwards compatibility.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12435 was an attempt to allow strict 2.0 compliance behind a flag, but was abandoned.
The approach in this PR is not strict and preserves backwards compatibility in a familiar bitcoin-y way: all old behavior is preserved, but new rules are applied to clients that opt in. One of the rules in the [JSON RPC 2.0 spec](https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification#request_object) is that the kv pair `"jsonrpc": "2.0"` must be present in the request. Well, let's just use that to trigger strict 2.0 behavior! When that kv pair is included in a request object, the [response will adhere to strict JSON-RPC 2.0 rules](https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification#response_object), essentially:
- always return HTTP 200 "OK" unless there really is a server error or malformed request
- either return `"error"` OR `"result"` but never both
- same behavior for single and batch requests
If this is merged next steps can be:
- Refactor bitcoin-cli to always use strict 2.0
- Refactor the python test framework to always use strict 2.0 for everything
- Begin deprecation process for 1.0/1.1 behavior (?)
If we can one day remove the old 1.0/1.1 behavior we can clean up the rpc code quite a bit.
ACKs for top commit:
cbergqvist:
re ACK cbc6c440e3
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK cbc6c440e3. Just suggested changes since the last review: changing uncaught exception error code from PARSE_ERROR to MISC_ERROR, renaming a few things, and adding comments.
tdb3:
re ACK for cbc6c440e3
Tree-SHA512: 0b702ed32368b34b29ad570d090951a7aeb56e3b0f2baf745bd32fdc58ef68fee6b0b8fad901f1ca42573ed714b150303829cddad4a34ca7ad847350feeedb36
42fb5311b1 rpc: return warnings as an array instead of just a single one (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
The RPC documentation for `getblockchaininfo`, `getmininginfo` and `getnetworkinfo` states that "warnings" returns "any network and blockchain warnings". In practice, only a single warning (i.e. the latest one that is set) is returned, the other ones are ignored.
Fix that by returning all warnings as an array.
As a side benefit, clean up the GetWarnings() logic.
Since this PR changes the RPC result schema, I've added release notes. Users can temporarily revert to the old results by using `-deprecatedrpc=warnings`, until it's removed in a future version.
---
Some historical context from git log:
- when `GetWarnings` was introduced in 401926283a, it was used in the `getinfo` RPC, where only a [single error/warning was returned](401926283a (diff-7442c48d42cd5455a79915a0f00cce5e13359db46437a32b812876edb0a5ccddR250)) (similar to how it is now).
- later on, "warnings" RPC response fields were introduced, e.g. in ef2a3de25c, with the description [stating](ef2a3de25c (diff-1021bd3c74415ad9719bd764ad6ca35af5dfb33b1cd863c0be49bdf52518af54R411)) that it returned "any network warnings" but in practice still only a single warning was returned
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 42fb5311b1
tdb3:
Re ACK for 42fb5311b1
TheCharlatan:
ACK 42fb5311b1
maflcko:
ACK 42fb5311b1🔺
Tree-SHA512: 4225ed8979cd5f030dec785a80e7452a041ad5703445da79d2906ada983ed0bbe7b15889d663d75aae4a77d92e302c93e93eca185c7bd47c9cce29e12f752bd3
Previously, our Android builds were geared towards generating APKs,
which relied on Qt. However, after migrating to C++20, compiling for
Android became unfeasible due to Qt 5.15's compatibility limitations
with NDK only up to r25, which includes an outdated embedded libc++.
All removed stuff will be reinstated after migrating the build system to
CMake and upgrading Qt to version 6.x."
5195baa600 depends: fix miniupnpc snprintf usage on Windows (fanquake)
3c2d440f14 depends: switch miniupnpc to CMake (Cory Fields)
f5618c79d9 depends: add upstream CMake patch to miniupnpc (fanquake)
6866b571ab depends: miniupnpc 2.2.7 (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This picks up one of the changes from #29232, which is a switch to building miniupnpc with CMake. It includes an update to the most recent version of miniupnpc (2.2.7), which means we can drop one patch from that commit, and includes a new patch for a change I've upstreamed https://github.com/miniupnp/miniupnp/pull/721, as well as some suggestions from the previous PR.
ACKs for top commit:
theuni:
ACK 5195baa600.
TheCharlatan:
utACK 5195baa600
Tree-SHA512: 5b27e132cd5eed285e9be34c8b96893417d92a1ae55c99345c9a89e1c1c5e40e4bc840bc061b879758b2b11fcb520cd98c3da985c1e153f2e5380cf63efe2d69
The RPC documentation for `getblockchaininfo`, `getmininginfo` and
`getnetworkinfo` states that "warnings" returns "any network and
blockchain warnings". In practice, only a single warning is returned.
Fix that by returning all warnings as an array.
As a side benefit, cleans up the GetWarnings() logic.
1ea8674316 [doc] update release-process.md and backports section of CONTRIBUTING (glozow)
Pull request description:
While doing various release process things for the first time, I noticed some of our docs are outdated and/or confusing.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 1ea8674316
Tree-SHA512: 4ad10d4ce2c33fe15cb02599353107bb72ecb867aefc6c120cfd5cdea42aa8fa3783f9e0218c2f3815f030e0694cc8fb24011ce88358a0206cb07416a256a962
2179e2c320 doc: i2p: improve `-i2pacceptincoming` mention (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
In i2p documentation, it says that "the first time Bitcoin Core connects to the I2P router,
it automatically generates a persistent I2P address and its corresponding private key by
default _**or if `-i2pacceptincoming=1` is set**_". This is weird, because `-i2pacceptincoming=1`
by itself does not have any effect. Moreover, `-i2pacceptincoming` is 1 by default anyway.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
This documentation change is correct and makes the documentation slightly shorter, thus easier to read. ACK 2179e2c320
davidgumberg:
ACK 2179e2c320
achow101:
ACK 2179e2c320
byaye:
ACK 2179e2c320
Tree-SHA512: 18a6a627343fb0aa824029d99df8a232153ba288ce94ec8c5da25693885237381fba505ea1e71c756b2a611243a302d319ca7ae03b526020cd6588710fc2ac17
3c1ae3ee33 depends: switch libnatpmp to CMake (Cory Fields)
72ba7b5d26 depends: libnatpmp f2433bec24ca3d3f22a8a7840728a3ac177f94ba (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This picks up one of the changes from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29232, which is a switch to building libnatpmp with CMake. It includes an update to the most recent version of libnatpmp (f2433bec24), which includes (https://github.com/miniupnp/libnatpmp/pull/43).
From an initial look I couldn't find any significant difference between the Autotools and CMake produced libs.
ACKs for top commit:
m3dwards:
ACK 3c1ae3ee33
hebasto:
ACK 3c1ae3ee33.
TheCharlatan:
ACK 3c1ae3ee33
Tree-SHA512: 1dd9d9933a5fceb9f8c4e1d68cd5cb4456a10a6dd27a6f6316f14493f9d2efad981ef8be9570c09ca82d45163aebd7f4cb2b2449989ec6084268ddba9a564c83
4357158c47 wallet: return and display signer error (Sjors Provoost)
dc55531087 wallet: compare address returned by displayaddress (Sjors Provoost)
6c1a2cc09a test: use h marker for external signer mock (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
* HWI returns the requested address: as a sanity check, we now compare that to what we expected
* external signer documentation now reflects that HWI alternatives must implement this check
* both RPC and GUI will now return an error text, rather than just fail (the GUI even failed silently in some cases)
ACKs for top commit:
brunoerg:
ACK 4357158c47
achow101:
ACK 4357158c47
Tree-SHA512: 4f56edf3846745c8e7d08ef55cf29e8bb468256457149377c5f02da097931f9ca0c06bdbd856dc2385cde4fd11e4dc3b634c5a48814ff27f5562c8a25d43da93
55b13ecd2e doc: explain what the wallet password does (Brandon Odiwuor)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18085
Add a document explaining what the wallet `passphrase` does
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
ACK 55b13ecd2e
achow101:
ACK 55b13ecd2e
Tree-SHA512: 6cc621269fe51ba7bd5d859427906a520e989bebcb274b08017c9900a4d781a165fc62dea46ed45aa48239cacd3c1f6eb4dd0c916be940d680a03266109716b0
21d0e6c7b7 doc: release notes for PR 27679 (Matthew Zipkin)
791dea204e test: cover unix sockets in zmq interface (Matthew Zipkin)
c87b0a0ff4 zmq: accept unix domain socket address for notifier (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27375, allowing ZMQ notifications to be published to a UNIX domain socket.
Fortunately, libzmq handles unix sockets already, all we really have to do to support it is allow the format in the actual option.
[libzmq](https://libzmq.readthedocs.io/en/latest/zmq_ipc.html) uses the prefix `ipc://` as opposed to `unix:` which is [used by Tor](https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor/-/blob/main/doc/man/tor.1.txt?ref_type=heads#L1475) and now also by [bitcoind](a85e5a7c9a/doc/release-notes-27375.md (L5)) so we need to switch that internally.
As far as I can tell, [LND](d20a764486/zmq.go (L38)) supports `ipc://` and `unix://` (notice the double slashes).
With this patch, LND can connect to bitcoind using unix sockets:
Example:
*bitcoin.conf*:
```
zmqpubrawblock=unix:/tmp/zmqsb
zmqpubrawtx=unix:/tmp/zmqst
```
*lnd.conf*:
```
bitcoind.zmqpubrawblock=ipc:///tmp/zmqsb
bitcoind.zmqpubrawtx=ipc:///tmp/zmqst
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 21d0e6c7b7
tdb3:
crACK for 21d0e6c7b7. Changes lgtm. Will follow up with some testing within the next few days as time allows.
achow101:
ACK 21d0e6c7b7
guggero:
Tested and code review ACK 21d0e6c7b7
Tree-SHA512: ffd50222e80dd029d903e5ddde37b83f72dfec1856a3f7ce49da3b54a45de8daaf80eea1629a30f58559f4b8ded0b29809548c0638cd1c2811b2736ad8b73030
- Mention which directories contain the respective unsigned tarballs
- Clarify that bitcoin.conf might not need to be updated
- Specify where to put historical release notes if there is already
something in release-notes.md
- Clarify what exactly is the problem with running guix-codesign more
than once
- Correct number: 6 codesigned attestations are needed before uploading
binaries
- Remove scp command which is outdated
- Remove server path which is outdated
- Specify that translations update should happen before branch-off, not
before each release candidate
- Mention that you should notify lists when RCs are available
- Put "Archive the release notes" as a separate step, since creating the
github release has a dependency on it.
- Put bitcoincore.org website updates as a separate step, since
updating packaging repos may have a dependency on it.
- Update "bitcoin-dev mailing list" to "bitcoin-dev group"
- Document that maintainers should create PRs to collect backports
- Remove section about not uploading `*-debug` files, reader should
upload all build artifacts.
- Torrent is created automatically, so delete instructions.
- Mention that server also generates ots file automatically.
24b67fa9f6 doc: Add example of mixing private and public keys in descriptors (Anton A)
Pull request description:
closes: #27414
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 24b67fa9f6
alfonsoromanz:
Re ACK 24b67fa9f6
Tree-SHA512: 8c063f23199ac0ff35909f786a5b0de1b4a9b15d1e93bdcdac10cb4bd2002c12e99b6fb1c2e56d16971e7622b67d910b79088429df92c48279be2d7797049911
78407b99ed [clang-tidy] Enable the misc-no-recursion check (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
Recursion is a frequent source of stack overflow bugs. Secondly, introduction of recursion can be non-obvious.
This PR proposes to use the clang-tidy `misc-no-recursion` check to make introduction of new recursion obvious. We don't make use of recursion a lot in our code base but there are a few places that need suppressions anyway (mostly the descriptor and univalue/rpc code).
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
ACK 78407b99ed
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK 78407b99ed
fanquake:
ACK 78407b99ed
Tree-SHA512: 34126d704c46086fe7371906ca852c25ced1dbd5fcfd85bf623810cd171a797569a92a33c7e26b8dc01c30c7bbf81aa326718926e8354585091411989a4edb14
The developer mailing list was migrated to Google Groups in February 2024
as announced in https://groups.google.com/g/bitcoindev/c/aewBuV6k-LI.
The archives maintained by the Linux Foundation stopped updating in December
2024. Thus, we point to the new archive maintained by gnusha.org.
The codebase refers to old discussions linked to the Linux Foundation archives.
Since all links are still active to this date, we keep them as they are.
See #29782.
80f8b92f4f remove libbitcoinconsensus (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This was deprecated in `v27.0`, for removal in `v28.0`. See discussion in PR #29189.
ACKs for top commit:
theuni:
Concept ACK and light review ACK 80f8b92f4f. My only hesitation here is that (afaics?) there's now nothing keeping undesired features like threading or globals from working their way into the interpreter in future commits.
m3dwards:
Concept ACK 80f8b92f4f
TheCharlatan:
ACK 80f8b92f4f
hebasto:
ACK 80f8b92f4f, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
Tree-SHA512: 17a62118aeb088f2695c892bb32794dfea3061e3cb7d9e8e9f1c06c3ff6f63a7587fa532e37edbb91fbc5a19b12c9a0f8e05fa9e8864aa07f92665375d847e80
430f319f73 depends: qt 5.15.13 (fanquake)
Pull request description:
I need to try and patch around Qts buildsystem to keep #21778 moving along (the issue being that even when you tell Qt to build using Clang on Linux, it still calls out to GCC, breaking our ability to have a macOS release build env that doesn't have a GCC toolchain installed, and thus no `ld` binary).
Before trying to patch Qt any further, update to the latest LTS release, and update the current patch set.
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK 430f319f73
hebasto:
re-ACK 430f319f73.
Tree-SHA512: 11122c04d63f4ec79e5d7945e1686eaf308cb1f98c3ff8bc52e265d7353cd4f1a532f4d78d55b43183245aeebf93cc1092087d9fe83e42eefa8a69ad9017d2da
