fae5bd9200 test: Fix wallet_balance intermittent issue (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Diff to reproduce:
```diff
index d2ed97ca76..25cc2d5734 100755
--- a/test/functional/wallet_balance.py
+++ b/test/functional/wallet_balance.py
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ class WalletTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
self.nodes[0].invalidateblock(block_reorg)
self.nodes[1].invalidateblock(block_reorg)
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(minconf=0), 0) # wallet txs not in the mempool are untrusted
- self.generatetoaddress(self.nodes[0], 1, ADDRESS_WATCHONLY, sync_fun=self.no_op)
+ self.generatetoaddress(self.nodes[0], 1, ADDRESS_WATCHONLY)
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(minconf=0), 0) # wallet txs not in the mempool are untrusted
# Now confirm tx_orig
```
Example in CI:
```
test 2022-08-24T10:09:22.486000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/cirrus-ci-build/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-i686-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 133, in main
self.run_test()
File "/tmp/cirrus-ci-build/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-i686-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/wallet_balance.py", line 269, in run_test
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(minconf=0), 0) # wallet txs not in the mempool are untrusted
File "/tmp/cirrus-ci-build/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-i686-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/util.py", line 56, in assert_equal
raise AssertionError("not(%s)" % " == ".join(str(arg) for arg in (thing1, thing2) + args))
AssertionError: not(98.85983340 == 0)
```
https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4981266251513856?logs=ci#L3269
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fae5bd9200
w0xlt:
ACK fae5bd9200
Tree-SHA512: 470f366720615c4a9326ec4c581fff569ecce9877f9134bb1975ec3d6f1d13a6403051418a91a80b2a86de617f43e539ec11bbf4f1713d0354d5b0ab98d22437
28ea4c7039 test: simplify splitment with `sendall` in wallet_basic (brunoerg)
923d24583d test: use `sendall` when emptying wallet (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
In some tests they have used `sendtoaddress` in order to empty a wallet. With the addition of `sendall`, it makes sense to use it for that.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 28ea4c7039
ishaanam:
utACK 28ea4c7039
w0xlt:
ACK 28ea4c7039
Tree-SHA512: 903136d7df5c65d3c02310d5a84241c9fd11070f69d932b4e188b8ad45c38ab5bc1bd5a9242b3e52d2576665ead14be0a03971a9ad8c00431fed442eba4ca48f
3add234546 ui: show header pre-synchronization progress (Pieter Wuille)
738421c50f Emit NotifyHeaderTip signals for pre-synchronization progress (Pieter Wuille)
376086fc5a Make validation interface capable of signalling header presync (Pieter Wuille)
93eae27031 Test large reorgs with headerssync logic (Suhas Daftuar)
355547334f Track headers presync progress and log it (Pieter Wuille)
03712dddfb Expose HeadersSyncState::m_current_height in getpeerinfo() (Suhas Daftuar)
150a5486db Test headers sync using minchainwork threshold (Suhas Daftuar)
0b6aa826b5 Add unit test for HeadersSyncState (Suhas Daftuar)
83c6a0c524 Reduce spurious messages during headers sync (Suhas Daftuar)
ed6cddd98e Require callers of AcceptBlockHeader() to perform anti-dos checks (Suhas Daftuar)
551a8d957c Utilize anti-DoS headers download strategy (Suhas Daftuar)
ed470940cd Add functions to construct locators without CChain (Pieter Wuille)
84852bb6bb Add bitdeque, an std::deque<bool> analogue that does bit packing. (Pieter Wuille)
1d4cfa4272 Add function to validate difficulty changes (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
New nodes starting up for the first time lack protection against DoS from low-difficulty headers. While checkpoints serve as our protection against headers that fork from the main chain below the known checkpointed values, this protection only applies to nodes that have been able to download the honest chain to the checkpointed heights.
We can protect all nodes from DoS from low-difficulty headers by adopting a different strategy: before we commit to storing a header in permanent storage, first verify that the header is part of a chain that has sufficiently high work (either `nMinimumChainWork`, or something comparable to our tip). This means that we will download headers from a given peer twice: once to verify the work on the chain, and a second time when permanently storing the headers.
The p2p protocol doesn't provide an easy way for us to ensure that we receive the same headers during the second download of peer's headers chain. To ensure that a peer doesn't (say) give us the main chain in phase 1 to trick us into permanently storing an alternate, low-work chain in phase 2, we store commitments to the headers during our first download, which we validate in the second download.
Some parameters must be chosen for commitment size/frequency in phase 1, and validation of commitments in phase 2. In this PR, those parameters are chosen to both (a) minimize the per-peer memory usage that an attacker could utilize, and (b) bound the expected amount of permanent memory that an attacker could get us to use to be well-below the memory growth that we'd get from the honest chain (where we expect 1 new block header every 10 minutes).
After this PR, we should be able to remove checkpoints from our code, which is a nice philosophical change for us to make as well, as there has been confusion over the years about the role checkpoints play in Bitcoin's consensus algorithm.
Thanks to Pieter Wuille for collaborating on this design.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-tACK 3add234546
mzumsande:
re-ACK 3add234546
sipa:
re-ACK 3add234546
glozow:
ACK 3add234546
Tree-SHA512: e7789d65f62f72141b8899eb4a2fb3d0621278394d2d7adaa004675250118f89a4e4cb42777fe56649d744ec445ad95141e10f6def65f0a58b7b35b2e654a875
In order to prevent memory DoS, we must ensure that we don't accept a new
header into memory until we've performed anti-DoS checks, such as verifying
that the header is part of a sufficiently high work chain. This commit adds a
new argument to AcceptBlockHeader() so that we can ensure that all call-sites
which might cause a new header to be accepted into memory have to grapple with
the question of whether the header is safe to accept, or needs further
validation.
This patch also fixes two places where low-difficulty-headers could have been
processed without such validation (processing an unrequested block from the
network, and processing a compact block).
Credit to Niklas Gögge for noticing this issue, and thanks to Sjors Provoost
for test code.
Avoid permanently storing headers from a peer, unless the headers are part of a
chain with sufficiently high work. This prevents memory attacks using low-work
headers.
Designed and co-authored with Pieter Wuille.
5ef8c2c9fc test: fix typo for MaybeResendWalletTxs (stickies-v)
fbba4a1316 wallet: trigger MaybeResendWalletTxs() every minute (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
ResendWalletTransactions() only executes every [12-36h (24h average)](1420547ec3/src/wallet/wallet.cpp (L1947)). Triggering it every second is excessive, once per minute should be plenty.
The goal of this PR is to reduce the amount of (unnecessary) schedule executions by ~60x without meaningfully altering transaction rebroadcast logic/assumptions which would require more significant review.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 5ef8c2c9fc
1440000bytes:
ACK 5ef8c2c9fc
Tree-SHA512: 4a077e3579b289c11c347eaa0d3601ef2dbb9fee66ab918d56b4a0c2e08222560a0e6be295297a74831836e001a997ecc143adb0c132faaba96a669dac1cd9e6
59aa54f731 i2p: log "SAM session" instead of "session" (Vasil Dimov)
d7ec30b648 doc: add release notes about the I2P transient addresses (Vasil Dimov)
47c0d02f12 doc: document I2P transient addresses usage in doc/i2p.md (Vasil Dimov)
3914e472f5 test: add a test that -i2pacceptincoming=0 creates a transient session (Vasil Dimov)
ae1e97ce86 net: use transient I2P session for outbound if -i2pacceptincoming=0 (Vasil Dimov)
a1580a04f5 net: store an optional I2P session in CNode (Vasil Dimov)
2b781ad66e i2p: add support for creating transient sessions (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Add support for generating a transient, one-time I2P address for ourselves when making I2P outbound connection and discard it once the connection is closed.
Background
---
In I2P connections, the host that receives the connection knows the I2P address of the connection initiator. This is unlike the Tor network where the recipient does not know who is connecting to them, not even the initiator's Tor address.
Persistent vs transient I2P addresses
---
Even if an I2P node is not accepting incoming connections, they are known to other nodes by their outgoing I2P address. This creates an opportunity to white-list given nodes or treat them differently based on their I2P address. However, this also creates an opportunity to fingerprint or analyze a given node because it always uses the same I2P address when it connects to other nodes. If this is undesirable, then a node operator can use the newly introduced `-i2ptransientout` to generate a transient (disposable), one-time I2P address for each new outgoing connection. That address is never going to be reused again, not even if reconnecting to the same peer later.
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
ACK 59aa54f731 (verified via range-diff that just a typo / `unique_ptr` initialisation were fixed)
achow101:
re-ACK 59aa54f731
jonatack:
utACK 59aa54f731 reviewed range diff, rebased to master, debug build + relevant tests + review at each commit
Tree-SHA512: 2be9b9dd7502b2d44a75e095aaece61700766bff9af0a2846c29ca4e152b0a92bdfa30f61e8e32b6edb1225f74f1a78d19b7bf069f00b8f8173e69705414a93e
b21e522ce4 test: speedup wallet tests by whitelisting peers (immediate tx relay) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
In the course of testing #25297 by running all wallet-related functional tests (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25297#issuecomment-1203365589), I noticed that the run-time of those tests vary a lot between runs, in fact too much for a useful comparison. This PR fixes this by making the tests both more deterministic and also faster, using the good ol' immediate tx relay trick (parameter `-whitelist=noban@127.0.0.1`).
master branch:
```
wallet_abandonconflict.py --descriptors | ✓ Passed | 7 s
wallet_abandonconflict.py --legacy-wallet | ✓ Passed | 23 s
wallet_balance.py --descriptors | ✓ Passed | 17 s
wallet_balance.py --legacy-wallet | ✓ Passed | 21 s
wallet_basic.py --descriptors | ✓ Passed | 32 s
wallet_basic.py --legacy-wallet | ✓ Passed | 56 s
wallet_bumpfee.py --descriptors | ✓ Passed | 44 s
wallet_bumpfee.py --legacy-wallet | ✓ Passed | 45 s
wallet_groups.py --descriptors | ✓ Passed | 89 s
wallet_groups.py --legacy-wallet | ✓ Passed | 94 s
wallet_hd.py --descriptors | ✓ Passed | 7 s
wallet_hd.py --legacy-wallet | ✓ Passed | 13 s
wallet_importdescriptors.py --descriptors | ✓ Passed | 26 s
wallet_listreceivedby.py --descriptors | ✓ Passed | 28 s
wallet_listreceivedby.py --legacy-wallet | ✓ Passed | 18 s
ALL | ✓ Passed | 520 s (accumulated)
Runtime: 526 s
```
PR branch:
```
wallet_abandonconflict.py --descriptors | ✓ Passed | 7 s
wallet_abandonconflict.py --legacy-wallet | ✓ Passed | 11 s
wallet_balance.py --descriptors | ✓ Passed | 8 s
wallet_balance.py --legacy-wallet | ✓ Passed | 8 s
wallet_basic.py --descriptors | ✓ Passed | 29 s
wallet_basic.py --legacy-wallet | ✓ Passed | 36 s
wallet_bumpfee.py --descriptors | ✓ Passed | 39 s
wallet_bumpfee.py --legacy-wallet | ✓ Passed | 32 s
wallet_groups.py --descriptors | ✓ Passed | 39 s
wallet_groups.py --legacy-wallet | ✓ Passed | 41 s
wallet_hd.py --descriptors | ✓ Passed | 8 s
wallet_hd.py --legacy-wallet | ✓ Passed | 11 s
wallet_importdescriptors.py --descriptors | ✓ Passed | 17 s
wallet_listreceivedby.py --descriptors | ✓ Passed | 7 s
wallet_listreceivedby.py --legacy-wallet | ✓ Passed | 9 s
ALL | ✓ Passed | 302 s (accumulated)
Runtime: 309 s
```
Note that an alternative approach could be to whitelist peers by default for nodes in the functional test framework and only enable the trickle relay for the few tests where it's really needed.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK b21e522ce4
Tree-SHA512: ac3c8f8f5a401d1b6af60ece9c77e72449f18920c2cb4a1bd65fb4d62cf428779ebf4e1d29009a882977b2252922df4e7183541e0da8de932f8cd479149e8a86
d1a0004621 test: add coverage for invalid parameters for `rescanblockchain` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following errors:
2bd9aa5a44/src/wallet/rpc/transactions.cpp (L880-L894)
ACKs for top commit:
w0xlt:
reACK d1a0004621
Tree-SHA512: c357fbda3d261e4d06a29d2a5350482db5f97a815adf59abdac1971eb19b69cfd4d54e4d21836851e2e3b116aa2a820ea1437c7aededf86b06df435cca16ac90
1dc03dda05 [doc] remove non-signaling mentions of BIP125 (glozow)
32024d40f0 scripted-diff: remove mention of BIP125 from non-signaling var names (glozow)
Pull request description:
We have pretty thorough documentation of our RBF policy in doc/policy/mempool-replacements.md. It enumerates each rule with several sentences of rationale. Also, each rule pretty much has its own function (3 and 4 share one), with extensive comments. The doc states explicitly that our rules are similar but differ from BIP125, and contains a record of historical changes to RBF policy.
We should not use "BIP125" as synonymous with our RBF policy because:
- Our RBF policy is different from what is specified in BIP125, for example:
- the BIP does not mention our rule about the replacement feerate being higher (our Rule 6)
- the BIP uses minimum relay feerate for Rule 4, while we have used incremental relay feerate since #9380
- the "inherited signaling" question (CVE-2021-31876). Call it discrepancy, ambiguous wording, doc misinterpretation, or implementation details, I would recommend users refer to doc/policy/mempool-replacements.md
- the signaling policy is configurable, see #25353
- Our RBF policy may change further
- We have already marked BIP125 as only "partially implemented" in docs/bips.md since 1fd49eb498
- See comments from people who are not me recently:
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25038#discussion_r909507429
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25575#issuecomment-1179519204
This PR removes all non-signaling mentions of BIP125 (if people feel strongly, we can remove all mentions of BIP125 period). It may be useful to refer to the concept of "tx opts in to RBF if it has at least one nSequence less than (0xffffffff - 1)" as "BIP125 signaling" because:
- It is succint.
- It has already been widely marketed as BIP125 opt-in signaling.
- Our API uses it when referring to signaling (e.g. getmempoolentry["bip125-replaceable"] and wallet error message "not BIP 125 replaceable"). Changing those is more invasive.
- If/when we have other ways to signal in the future, we can disambiguate them this way. See #25038 which proposes another way of signaling, and where I pulled these commits from.
Alternatives:
- Changing our policy to match BIP125. This doesn't make sense as, for example, we would have to remove the requirement that a replacement tx has a higher feerate (Rule 6).
- Changing BIP125 to match what we have. This doesn't make sense as it would be a significant change to a BIP years after it was finalized and already used as a spec to implement RBF in other places.
- Document our policy as a new BIP and give it a number. This might make sense if we don't expect things to change a lot, and can be done as a next step.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
ACK 1dc03dda05
ariard:
ACK 1dc03dda
t-bast:
ACK 1dc03dda05
Tree-SHA512: a3adc2039ec5785892d230ec442e50f47f7062717392728152bbbe27ce1c564141f85253143f53cb44e1331cf47476d74f5d2f4b3cd873fc3433d7a0aa783e02
c3b099ace0 wallet, tests: Test bumpfee's max input weight calculation (Andrew Chow)
116a620ce7 Make DUMMY_CHECKER availble outside of script/sign.cpp (Andrew Chow)
ff638323d1 test, bumpfee: Check that psbtbumpfee can bump txs with external inputs (Andrew Chow)
1bc8106d4c bumpfee: be able to bump fee of a tx with external inputs (Andrew Chow)
31dd3dc9e5 bumpfee: Clear scriptSigs and scriptWitnesses before calculated max size (Andrew Chow)
a0c3afb898 bumpfee: extract weights of external inputs when bumping fee (Andrew Chow)
612f1e44fe bumpfee: Calculate fee by looking up UTXOs (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR allows `psbtbumpfee` to return a PSBT for transactions that contain external inputs. This does not work for bumping in the GUI nor `bumpfee` because these need private keys available to sign and send the transaction. But `psbtbumpfee` returns a psbt, so it is fine to not be able to sign.
In order to correctly estimate the size of the inputs for coin selection, the fee bumper will use the size of the inputs of the transaction being bumped. Because the sizes of signatures are not guaranteed, for external inputs, the fee bumper will verify the scripts with a special SignatureChecker which will compute the weight of all of the signatures in that input, and compute their weights if those signatures were maximally sized. This allows the fee bumper to obtain a max size estimate for each external input.
Builds on #23201 as it relies on the ability to pass weights in to coin selection.
Closes#23189
ACKs for top commit:
ishaanam:
reACK c3b099ace0
t-bast:
Re-ran my tests agains c3b099ace0, ACK
Tree-SHA512: 40016ec52d351430977579cfa2694c7e6764f42c9ce09d3a6f1753b767f86053f296d9de988248df033be6d725d67badbf2a5ef82c8ace23c61487729b7691e5
If an external input's utxo was created by a transaction that the wallet
knows about, then it would not be selected using SelectExternal. This
results in either funding failure or incorrect weight calculation.
8cd21bb279 refactor: improve readability for AttemptSelection (josibake)
f47ff71761 test: only run test for descriptor wallets (josibake)
0760ce0b9e test: add missing BOOST_ASSERT (josibake)
db09aec937 wallet: switch to new shuffle, erase, push_back (josibake)
b6b50b0f2b scripted-diff: Uppercase function names (josibake)
3f27a2adce refactor: add new helper methods (josibake)
f5649db9d5 refactor: add UNKNOWN OutputType (josibake)
Pull request description:
This PR is to address follow-ups for #24584, specifically:
* Remove redundant, hard-to-read code by adding a new `OutputType` and adding shuffle, erase, and push_back methods for `CoinsResult`
* Add missing `BOOST_ASSERT` to unit test
* Ensure functional test only runs if using descriptor wallets
* Improve readability of `AttemptSelection` by removing triple-nested if statement
Note for reviewers: commit `refactor: add new helper methods` should throw an "unused function warning"; the function is used in the next commit. Also, commit `wallet: switch to new shuffle, erase, push_back` will fail to compile, but this is fixed in the next commit with a scripted-diff. the commits are separate like this (code change then scripted-diff) to improve legibility.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 8cd21bb279
aureleoules:
ACK 8cd21bb279.
LarryRuane:
Concept, code review ACK 8cd21bb279
furszy:
utACK 8cd21bb2. Left a small, non-blocking, comment.
Tree-SHA512: a1bbc5962833e3df4f01a4895d8bd748cc4c608c3f296fd94e8afd8797b8d2e94e7bd44d598bd76fa5c9f5536864f396fcd097348fa0bb190a49a86b0917d60e
a6b0c1fcc0 doc: add releases notes for 25504 (listsinceblock updates) (Antoine Poinsot)
0fd2d14454 rpc: add an include_change parameter to listsinceblock (Antoine Poinsot)
55f98d087e rpc: output parent wallet descriptors for coins in listunspent (Antoine Poinsot)
b724476158 rpc: output wallet descriptors for received entries in listsinceblock (Antoine Poinsot)
55a82eaf91 wallet: allow to fetch the wallet descriptors for a given Script (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
Wallet descriptors are useful for applications using the Bitcoin Core wallet as a backend for tracking coins, as they allow to track coins for multiple descriptors in a single wallet. However there is no information currently given for such applications to link a coin with an imported descriptor, severely limiting the possibilities for such applications of using multiple descriptors in a single wallet. This PR outputs the matching imported descriptor(s) for a given received coin in `listsinceblock` (and friends).
It comes from a need for an application i'm working on, but i think it's something any software using `bitcoind` to track multiple descriptors in a single wallet would have eventually. For instance i'm thinking about the BDK project. Currently, the way to achieve this is to import raw addresses with labels and to have your application be responsible for wallet things like the gap limit.
I'll add this to the output of `listunspent` too if this gets a few Concept ACKs.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK a6b0c1fcc0
achow101:
re-ACK a6b0c1fcc0
Tree-SHA512: 7a5850e8de98b439ddede2cb72de0208944f8cda67272e8b8037678738d55b7a5272375be808b0f7d15def4904430e089dafdcc037436858ff3292c5f8b75e37
It's useful for an external application tracking coins to not be limited
by our change detection. For instance, for a watchonly wallet with two
descriptors a transaction from one to the other would be considered a
change output and not be included in the result (if the address was not
generated by this wallet).
The test is a bit primitive as it checks the Bitcoin Core log and
assumes that if it logs that it creates a transient session, then it
does that indeed.
A more thorough test would be to check that it indeed sends the
`SESSION CREATE ... DESTINATION=TRANSIENT` command and that it uses
the returned I2P address for connecting, even for repeated connections
to the same I2P peer. That would require a mocked SAM server (proxy)
implementation in Python.
f6a916683d Add functional test for block announcements during initial headers sync (Suhas Daftuar)
05f7f31598 Reduce bandwidth during initial headers sync when a block is found (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
On startup, if our headers chain is more than a day behind current time, we'll pick one peer to sync headers with until our best headers chain is caught up (at that point, we'll try to sync headers with all peers).
However, if an INV for a block is received before our headers chain is caught up, we'll then start to sync headers from each peer announcing the block. This can result in doing a big headers sync with many (if not all) of our peers simultaneously, which wastes bandwidth.
This PR would reduce that overhead by picking (at most) one new peer to try syncing headers with whenever a new block is announced, prior to our headers chain being caught up.
ACKs for top commit:
LarryRuane:
ACK f6a916683d
ajtowns:
ACK f6a916683d
mzumsande:
ACK f6a916683d
dergoegge:
Code review ACK f6a916683d
achow101:
ACK f6a916683d
Tree-SHA512: 0662000bd68db146f55981de4adc2e2b07cbfda222b1176569d61c22055e5556752ffd648426f69687ed1cc203105515e7304c12b915d6270df8e41a4a0e1eaa
292b1a3e9c GetExternalSigner(): fail if multiple signers are found (amadeuszpawlik)
Pull request description:
If there are multiple external signers, `GetExternalSigner()` will
just pick the first one in the list. If the user has two or more
hardware wallets connected at the same time, he might not notice this.
This PR adds a check and fails with suitable message, forcing the user to disconnect all but one external signer, so that there is no ambiguity as to which external signer was used.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK 292b1a3e9c
achow101:
ACK 292b1a3e9c
Tree-SHA512: e2a41d3eecc607d4f94e708614bed0f3545f7abba85f300c5a5f0d3d17d72c815259734accc5ca370953eacd290f27894ba2c18016f5e9584cd50fa1ec2fbb0b
8b3d2bbd0d test: add tests for `datacarrier` and `datacarriersize` options (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
As suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25787, this PR adds tests for `datacarrier` and `datacarriersize` initialization options.
Close https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25787.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
re-ACK 8b3d2bbd0d
stickies-v:
re-ACK 8b3d2bbd0d
Tree-SHA512: 962638ac9659f9d641bc5d1eff0571a08085dc7d4981b534b7ede03e4c702abd7048d543c199a588e2f94567b6d2393280e686629b19d7f4b24d365662be5e40
70a55c059b psbt: Avoid unsigned int overflow in PSBT_IN_TAP_BIP32_DERIVATION (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Fixes#25749
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 70a55c059b
darosior:
re-utACK 70a55c059b
jonatack:
Review ACK 70a55c059b, this should avoid the issue reported in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25749
Tree-SHA512: 6bb58e1cda9a5baa50fcd24f818b5b27ed94f0d33da3f71f6e457618176611bf2a84e1864e9a48d9303c301252bc4c1dee8b19a67dd713e849fb9442851ca341
b4a5ab96b4 test: refactor: deduplicate `DEFAULT_{ANCESTOR,DESCENDANT}_LIMIT` constants (Sebastian Falbesoner)
0fda1c7df6 scripted-diff: test: rename `MAX_{ANCESTORS,DESCENDANTS}` to `DEFAULT_{ANCESTOR,DESCENDANT}_LIMIT` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR renames the default in-mempool max ancestors/descendants constants `MAX_ANCESTORS`/`MAX_DESCENDANTS` in the functional tests to match the ones in the codebase:
c012875b9d/src/policy/policy.h (L58-L59)c012875b9d/src/policy/policy.h (L62-L63)
The custom limit constants `MAX_ANCESTORS_CUSTOM`/`MAX_DESCENDANTS_CUSTOM` are also renamed accordingly to better fit to this naming style. In the second commit, the default constants are deduplicated by moving them into the `messages.py` module. (Not sure if this module is really appropriate, as it doesn't have a connection to messages. If someone has a good suggestion, would be glad to hear it.)
ACKs for top commit:
w0xlt:
ACK b4a5ab96b4
glozow:
utACK b4a5ab96b4
fanquake:
ACK b4a5ab96b4
Tree-SHA512: a15c8256170afce3e383fceddcb562f588a02be97ce4202c84a2ebf22d73ab843f5e5a7d7c98e9ea044d8bcb7a4aeae0081d0e84c53e8fc0edffbcca00460139
4edc689382 doc: test: suggest multi-line imports in functional test style guide (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
As long as I remember contributing to functional tests (~2-3 years), it was always kind of an unwritten rule that multi-line imports are preferred over single-line imports in order to reduce the possibility of potential merge conflicts -- at least if more than one symbol from a module is imported. This PR adds this rule to the style guide and adapts the example test accordingly. (Inspired by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25792#discussion_r941180819).
ACKs for top commit:
kouloumos:
ACK 4edc689382
1440000bytes:
ACK 4edc689382
w0xlt:
ACK 4edc689382
fanquake:
ACK 4edc689382
Tree-SHA512: c7b6ff62f601f4e57cc8334d291662987d6737ebca8d81c063280409f4412302172f1404ec16afc9a13007bcdba55bdab66b9b80363287e287888929cb386584
0532aa7444 test: don't rely on usdt block_conn event order (0xb10c)
Pull request description:
Relying on block_connected event order in the USDT interface tests turned out to be brittle.
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25793
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25764
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 40b5012ac80a8eac9d2f374cd39304488009c29adb474dc5e8c03b96c354be358298d2ddee8de480afecc187e1bf42ee119b7aa6216b086a8bf77b7e1310213c
155344960b test: negative/unknown `rpcserialversion` should throw an init error (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following init errors:
41205bf442/src/init.cpp (L1025-L1030)
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 4456949e9a13908a5a59b13ed57bc3002b7ffd626e8dfb0346aa2600937ba1ef1b69cbae45cdb6bbc1c019dbcd64844e736a2ddd671a4704e53804355b6ea9f9
544b4332f0 Add wallet tests for spending rawtr() (Pieter Wuille)
e1e3081200 If P2TR tweaked key is available, sign with it (Pieter Wuille)
8d9670ccb7 Add rawtr() descriptor for P2TR with unknown tweak (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
It may be useful to be able to represent P2TR outputs in descriptors whose script tree and/or internal key aren't known. This PR does that, by adding a `rawtr(KEY)` descriptor, where the KEY represents the output key directly. If the private key corresponding to that output key is known, it also permits signing with it.
I'm not convinced this is desirable, but presumably "tr(KEY)" sounds more intended for direct use than "rawtr(KEY)".
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 544b4332f0
sanket1729:
code review ACK 544b4332f0
w0xlt:
reACK 544b4332f0
Tree-SHA512: 0de08de517468bc22ab0c00db471ce33144f5dc211ebc2974c6ea95709f44e830532ec5cdb0128c572513d352120bd651c4559516d4500b5b0a3d257c4b45aca
68006c10ab test: check that `verifymessage` RPC fails for non-P2PKH addresses (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for the `verifymessage` RPC, for the case that a non-P2PKH (but otherwise valid) address is passed:
e09ad284c7/src/util/message.cpp (L38-L40)e09ad284c7/src/rpc/signmessage.cpp (L48-L49)
The passed addresses to trigger the error are of the types nested segwit (P2SH-P2WPKH) and native segwit (P2WPKH) and are created with a helper function `addresses_from_privkey` using descriptors and the `deriveaddresses` RPC. At some point in the future, if we have BIP322 support, all those will likely succeed and can then be moved from error-throwing to the succedding assert loop.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 68006c10ab
w0xlt:
ACK 68006c10ab
Tree-SHA512: fec4ed97460787c2ef3d04e3fce89c9365c87207c8358b59c41890f3738355c002e64f289ab4aef794ef4dfd5c867be8b67d736fb620489204f2c6bfb8d3363c
db10cf8ae3 rpc/wallet: add simulaterawtransaction RPC (Karl-Johan Alm)
701a64f548 test: add support for Decimal to assert_approx (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
(note: this was originally titled "add analyzerawtransaction RPC")
This command iterates over the inputs and outputs of the given transactions, and tallies up the balance change for the given wallet. This can be useful e.g. when verifying that a coin join like transaction doesn't contain unexpected inputs that the wallet will then sign for unintentionally.
I originally proposed this to Elements (https://github.com/ElementsProject/elements/pull/1016) and it was suggested that I propose this upstream.
There is an alternative #22776 to instead add this info to `getbalances` when providing an optional transaction as argument.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK db10cf8ae3
achow101:
re-ACK db10cf8ae3
Tree-SHA512: adf222ec7dcdc068d007ae6f465dbc35b692dc7bb2db337be25340ad0c2f9c64cfab4124df23400995c700f41c83c29a2c34812121782c26063b100c7969b89d
