79facb11e9 wallet: use constant CWallets in rpcwallet.cpp (Karl-Johan Alm)
d9b0ebc1da wallet: make ReserveDestination pwallet ivar const (Karl-Johan Alm)
57c569e4d9 wallet: make BackupWallet() const (Karl-Johan Alm)
df3a818d2a wallet: make getters const (Karl-Johan Alm)
227b9dd2d6 wallet/spkm: make GetOldestKeyPoolTime() const (Karl-Johan Alm)
22d329ad0e wallet: use constant CWallets in rpcdump.cpp (Karl-Johan Alm)
7b3587b29d wallet/db: make IsDummy() const (Karl-Johan Alm)
d366795d18 wallet/db: make Backup() const (Karl-Johan Alm)
8cd0b86340 wallet: make CanGetAddresses() const (Karl-Johan Alm)
037fa770eb wallet: make KeypoolCountExternalKeys() const (Karl-Johan Alm)
ddc93557ad wallet: make CanGenerateKeys() const (Karl-Johan Alm)
dc2d0650fd make BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain() const (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
A lot of places refer to `CWallet*`'s as `CWallet * const`, which translates to *"an immutable pointer to a mutable `CWallet` instance"*; this is
1. often not what the author meant, especially as a lot of these places do not at all modify the wallet object, and
2. confusing, as it tends to suggest that this is a proper way to refer to a constant `CWallet` instance.
This PR changes references to wallets to `const CWallet* const` whenever immutability is expected. This should result in no behavioral changes at all, and improved compile-time error checking.
Note from irc:
> <sipa> sounds good to me; this is the sort of change that as long as it compiles, the behavior shouldn't change
> <sipa> though in general it may lead to introducing automatic copying of objects sometimes (e.g. trying to std::move a const object will work, but generally result in a copy rather than an efficient move)
> <sipa> CWallet objects aren't copied or moved though
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 79facb11e9
Empact:
ACK 79facb11e9
promag:
ACK 79facb11e9.
fjahr:
ACK 79facb11e9
Tree-SHA512: 80a80c1a52f0f788d0ccb268b53bc0f46c796643a3c5a22b55bbbde4ffa6c7e347784e5e53b1e488a3b4e14399e31d5be9417ad5b6319c74a462609e9b1a98e8
* GetAvoidReuseFlag: simply gets the flag, without modifying the wallet
* ListReceived: helper function to produce lists
* ListTransactions: produces a list of transactions, without modifications; two cases of map [] -> .at() for verified-existing keys
* DescribeWalletAddress: generates a description of a given wallet address without changing the wallet
* The following functions produce a list without making any modifications to the wallet:
* listaddressgroupings
* listreceivedbyaddress
* listreceivedbylabel
* listtransactions
* listsinceblock
* listlockunspent
* listunspent
* listlabels
* getreceivedbyaddress
* getreceivedbylabel
* getaddressesbylabel
* signmessage: uses the wallet to procure a private key for signing, but does no modifications
* getbalance, getunconfirmedbalance: calculates the wallet balance, without any modifications
* gettransaction: procures transaction without any modifications
* backupwallet: makes a backup of the wallet to disk, without changing said wallet
* getwalletinfo: produces info about wallet without any modifications
* signrawtransactionwithwallet: modifies incoming transaction on the fly by signing with private key procured from within wallet; no modifications to wallet
* getaddressinfo: gets information about the given address, with no modifications done to the wallet; one case of [] -> .at() and one ::iterator -> ::const_iterator
* walletprocesspsbt: processes the given PSBT on the fly, without modifying the wallet
5bad7921d0 [test] PSBT RPC: check that bip32_derivs are present by default (Sjors Provoost)
29a21c9061 [rpc] set default bip32derivs to true for psbt methods (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
In https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13557#pullrequestreview-135905054 I recommended not including bip32 deriviation by default in PSBTs:
> _Bit of a privacy issue_: let's say person A and B are about to spend from a multisig address, sending everything to person A. Person A gives their address to person B, their wallet wallet creates a PSBT, but doesn't sign it. Wallet A then calls `walletprocesspsbt` which signs it and _spontaneously adds the master_fingerprint and bip32 path_. Same issue with `walletcreatefundedpsbt`.
>
> Adding `bip32_derivs` should probably be opt-in.
In practice I find this default quite annoying because I forget it and end up with a confused hardware wallet.
More importantly, in the multisig example I provided, it's actually essential for the other side to know the derivation details (in addition to an xpub). This allows them to check that change is going to an address you can still co-sign for (because the spending policy is unchanged except for an index).
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK 5bad7921d0
jonatack:
ACK 5bad7921d0 code review, built, ran tests, inspected/messed around with/pprinted values from the new tests. Thanks for adding the tests.
meshcollider:
utACK 5bad7921d0
Tree-SHA512: 22ad71dda96856060a96758c4ae7aafa22d5e9efba30e0c8287c711e7579849bd72593cbc0f41a2e9e8821315d78bda04e848dbb006283b841b2795e2faebcfd
e193a84fb2 Refactor message hashing into a utility function (Jeffrey Czyz)
f8f0d9893d Deduplicate the message signing code (Vasil Dimov)
2ce3447eb1 Deduplicate the message verifying code (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
The message signing and verifying logic was replicated in a few places
in the code. Consolidate in a newly introduced `MessageSign()` and
`MessageVerify()` and add unit tests for them.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-ACK e193a84fb2
achow101:
ACK e193a84fb2
instagibbs:
utACK e193a84fb2
meshcollider:
utACK e193a84fb2
Tree-SHA512: b0e02a7d4623a98c8f8c77627af1725e6df07700de4630c2f75da6beacdf55414c38ba147bc6d2a757491ab07c827dddf93e8632fe600478760e255714ddab88
These functions are used to mark/check if a key of our own has been used to spend (and only for avoid-reuse wallets), which has nothing to do with the destination/address itself.
Give them more accurate names to avoid confusion.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i -e 's/UsedDestination/SpentKey/g' $(git grep -l 'UsedDestination' ./src)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
7f1475c711 rpc: update validateaddress RPCExamples to bech32 (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Another small step to get rid of legacy addresses in the RPC help texts and by that encourage the use of bech32 addresses by default. The (invalid) address is the same as in the `getaddressinfo` RPC (see 2ee0cb3330, kudos to jonatack!), I don't think it adds any value to have a different example address per RPC.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 7f1475c711
MarcoFalke:
ACK 7f1475c711
Tree-SHA512: 2350f61fa942a9053f9f5c860ea446965dc7209c71c81bdb98a859d03ca23b225ad72c9c506e4a55c8d8988823d9cfbe808c1a452a1eeadb70ab186b146dd4ca
fad027fb0c scripted-diff: Add missing spaces in RPCResult, Fix type names (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This makes the rendered diff smaller when the RPCResult is machine generated later on (Previous attempts: #14601 and #14459)
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK fad027fb0c
Tree-SHA512: 48afd571b1cd349ca0b29bb444c1c7cda657e07dd96c610d479f931ccd938186aec98e533d0552b5b10afc9a3d7b911359260a49448e8e1106e3647b2c71f3ba
The logic of signing a message was duplicated in 3 places:
src/qt/signverifymessagedialog.cpp
SignVerifyMessageDialog::on_signMessageButton_SM_clicked()
src/rpc/misc.cpp
signmessagewithprivkey()
src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp
signmessage()
Move the logic into
src/util/message.cpp
MessageSign()
and call it from all the 3 places.
The logic of verifying a message was duplicated in 2 places:
src/qt/signverifymessagedialog.cpp
SignVerifyMessageDialog::on_verifyMessageButton_VM_clicked()
src/rpc/misc.cpp
verifymessage()
with the only difference being the result handling. Move the logic into
a dedicated
src/util/message.cpp
MessageVerify()
which returns a set of result codes, call it from the 2 places and just
handle the results differently in the callers.
25bc17fceb refactor: rpc: Remove vector copy from listtransactions (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Current approach
- copy accumulated `ret` vector to `arrTmp`
- drop unnecessary elements from `arrTmp`
- reverse `arrTmp`
- clear `ret`
- copy `arrTmp` to the `ret`
New approach
- create a vector from the accumulated `ret` with just the necessary elements already reversed
- copy it to the result
This PR doesn't change behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 25bc17fceb. Just comment and commit message tweaks since last review
Tree-SHA512: 87906561e3accdbdb0f4a8194cbcd76ea53ae53d0ce135b90bc54a5f77e300b14ef08505e7daf1fe52426f135442a743da5a027416a769bd454922357cebe7c0
also contains the following changes:
- rpc: factor out example bech32 address for RPCExamples
- doc: update developer notes wrt RPCExamples addresses
(mention the EXAMPLE_ADDRESS constant as an example for an invalid bech32
address suitable for RPCExamples help documentation)
19a354b11f Output a descriptor in createmultisig and addmultisigaddress (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Give a descriptor from `createmultisig` and `addmultisigaddress`.
Extracted from #16528 with `addmultisgaddress` and tests added.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK 19a354b11f
MarcoFalke:
ACK 19a354b11f
promag:
Code review ACK 19a354b11f.
meshcollider:
utACK 19a354b11f
Tree-SHA512: e813125fbbc358ea8d45b1748de16a29a94efd83175b748fb8fa3b0bfc8e783ed36b6c554d84f5d4ead1ba252a83a3e937b6c3f75da7b8d3b4e55f94d6013771
d3bc184081 doc: update release notes with getaddressinfo label deprecation (Jon Atack)
72af93f364 test: getaddressinfo label deprecation test (Jon Atack)
d48875fa20 rpc: deprecate getaddressinfo label field (Jon Atack)
dc0cabeda4 test: remove getaddressinfo label tests (Jon Atack)
c7654af6f8 doc: address pr17578 review feedback (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR builds on #17578 (now merged) and deprecates the rpc getaddressinfo `label` field. The deprecated behavior can be re-enabled by starting bitcoind with `-deprecatedrpc=label`.
See http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-11-22.html#l-622 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17283#issuecomment-554458001 for more context.
Reviewers: This PR may be tested manually by building, then running bitcoind with and without the `-deprecatedrpc=label` flag while verifying the rpc getaddressinfo output and help text.
Next step: add support for multiple labels.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK d3bc184081
laanwj:
ACK d3bc184081
meshcollider:
utACK d3bc184081
Tree-SHA512: f954402884ec54977def332c8160fd892f289b0d2aee1e91fed9ac3220f7e5b1f7fc6421b84cc7a5c824a0582eca4e6fc194e4e33ddd378c733c8941ac45f56d
Needed for future ScriptPubKeyMans which may need to create
SigningProviders dynamically and thus a normal pointer is not enough
This commit does not change behavior.
8925df86c4 doc: update release notes (Jon Atack)
8bb405bbad test: getaddressinfo labels purpose deprecation test (Jon Atack)
60aba1f2f1 rpc: simplify getaddressinfo labels, deprecate previous behavior (Jon Atack)
7851f14ccf rpc: incorporate review feedback from PR 17283 (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR builds on #17283 (now merged) and is followed by #17585.
It modifies the value returned by rpc getaddressinfo `labels` to an array of label name strings and deprecates the previous behavior of returning an array of JSON hash structures containing label `name` and address `purpose` key/value pairs.
before
```
"labels": [
{
"name": "DOUBLE SPEND",
"purpose": "receive"
}
```
after
```
"labels": [
"DOUBLE SPEND"
]
```
The deprecated behavior can be re-enabled by starting bitcoind with `-deprecatedrpc=labelspurpose`.
For context, see:
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17283#issuecomment-554458001
- http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-12-13.html#l-425 (lines 425-427)
- http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-11-22.html#l-622
Reviewers: This PR may be tested manually by building, then running bitcoind with and without the `-deprecatedrpc=labelspurpose` flag while verifying the rpc getaddressinfo help text and `labels` output.
Next steps: deprecate the rpc getaddressinfo `label` field (EDIT: done in #17585) and add support for multiple labels per address. This PR will unblock those.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
reACK 8925df8
promag:
Code review ACK 8925df86c4.
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 8925df86c4
Tree-SHA512: c2b717209996da32b6484de7bb8800e7048410f9ce6afdb3e02a6866bd4a8f2c730f905fca27b10b877b91cf407f546e69e8c4feb9cd934325a6c71c166bd438
091a876664 Test watchonly wallet bumpfee with PSBT return (Gregory Sanders)
e9b4f9419c bumpfee: Return PSBT when wallet has privkeys disabled (Gregory Sanders)
75a5e478b6 Change bumpfee to use watch-only funds for legacy watchonly wallets (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
The main use-case here is for using with watch-only wallets with PSBT-signing cold wallets of all kinds.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 091a876664
Sjors:
Tested ACK 091a876664
meshcollider:
utACK 091a876664
Tree-SHA512: f7cf663e1af0b029e5c99eac88c5fdc3bc9e9a3841da8a608e8a9957e9bcf6a78864b8c2706fcaf78a480ffe11badd80c4fad29f97c0bb929e0470fafda5c22e
09502452bb IsUsedDestination should count any known single-key address (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
This plugs the privacy leak detailed at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17605, at least for the single-key case.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
Code Review ACK 09502452bb
Tree-SHA512: e1d68281675f05072b3087171cba1df9416a69c9ccf70c72e8555e55eadda2d0fd339e5a894e3a3438ff94b9e3827fb19b8b701faade70c08756b19ff157ee0c
- change the value returned in the RPC getaddressinfo `labels` field to an array
of label name strings
- deprecate the previous behavior of returning a JSON hash structure containing
label `name` and address `purpose` key/value pairs
- update the relevant tests
33f5fc32e5 test: add rpc getaddressinfo labels test coverage (Jon Atack)
0f3539ac6d test: add listlabels test in wallet_labels.py (Jon Atack)
1388de8390 rpc: add getaddressinfo code documentation (Jon Atack)
2ee0cb3330 rpc: update getaddressinfo RPCExamples to bech32 (Jon Atack)
8d1ed0c263 rpc: clarify label vs labels in getaddressinfo RPCHelpman (Jon Atack)
5a0ed85070 rpc: improve getaddressinfo RPCHelpman content (Jon Atack)
70cda342cd rpc: improve getaddressinfo RPCHelpman formatting (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR is a continuation of the work in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12892.
Main motivations:
- There is currently no test coverage for the getaddressinfo `labels` response. Coverage here is a prerequisite before deprecating the `label` response or adding multiple labels per address.
- `bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` returns a few content errors, difficult-to-read formatting, and no explanation why it returns both `label` and `labels` and how they relate, which can be confusing for application developers.
Changes by order of commits:
- [x] improve/fix getaddressinfo RPCHelpman layout formatting
- [x] improve/fix getaddressinfo RPCHelpman content
- [x] clarify the `label` and `labels` fields in getaddressinfo RPCHelpman
- [x] update getaddressinfo RPCExamples addresses to bech32
- [x] add getaddressinfo code docs
- [x] add a `listlabels` test assertion in wallet_labels.py
- [x] add missing getaddressinfo `labels` test coverage and improve the existing `label` tests
Here are gists of the CLI help output:
[`bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` before this PR](https://gist.github.com/jonatack/022af5221a85c069780359a22643c810)
[`bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` after this PR](https://gist.github.com/jonatack/4ee5f6abc62a3d99269570206a5f90ba)
It seems we ought to begin a deprecation process for the getaddressinfo `label` field? If yes, I have a follow-up ready. _--> EDIT: Deprecation follow-ups #17578 and #17585 now build on this PR._
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Re-ACK 33f5fc32e5
jnewbery:
ACK 33f5fc32e5.
Tree-SHA512: a001aa863090ec2566a31059477945b1c303ebeb430b33472f8b150e420fa5742fc33bca9d95571746395b607f43f6078dd5b53e238ac1f3fc648b51c8f79a07
d0dab897af Refactor: Require scriptPubKey to get wallet SigningProvider (Andrew Chow)
4b0c718f8f Accumulate result UniValue in SignTransaction (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Easier to review ignoring whitespace:
git log -p -n1 -w
This commit does not change behavior. It passes new CScript arguments to
signing functions, but the arguments aren't currently used.
Split from #17261
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK d0dab897af
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK d0dab897af. Thanks for the SignTransaction update. No other changes since last review
Sjors:
Code review ACK d0dab897af
promag:
Code review ACK d0dab897af.
meshcollider:
Code review ACK d0dab897af
Tree-SHA512: c3f52df20fd9d6b3b5aa65562cf5f7dce7b7f44c148b0f988f8b578fce2a28e9b7bf010f5f04bb5bf60f5272b2899f1dbbfb8aee81579c21c9cba559d1d2bb70
Easier to review ignoring whitespace:
git log -p -n1 -w
This commit does not change behavior. It passes new CScript arguments to
signing functions, but the arguments aren't currently used.
SignTransaction will be called multiple times in the future. Pass
it a result UniValue so that it can accumulate the results of multiple
SignTransaction passes.
36b68de5b2 Remove getBlockDepth method from Chain::interface (Antoine Riard)
b66c429c56 Remove locked_chain from GetDepthInMainChain and its callers (Antoine Riard)
0ff03871ad Use CWallet::m_last_block_processed_height in GetDepthInMainChain (Antoine Riard)
f77b1de16f Only return early from BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain if current tip is exact match (Antoine Riard)
769ff05e48 Refactor some importprunedfunds checks with guard clause (Antoine Riard)
5971d3848e Add block_height field in struct Confirmation (Antoine Riard)
9700fcb47f Replace CWalletTx::SetConf by Confirmation initialization list (Antoine Riard)
5aacc3eff1 Add m_last_block_processed_height field in CWallet (Antoine Riard)
10b4729e33 Pass block height in Chain::BlockConnected/Chain::BlockDisconnected (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
Work starter to remove Chain::Lock interface by adding m_last_block_processed_height in CWallet and m_block_height in CMerkleTx to avoid GetDepthInMainChain having to keep a lock . Once this one done, it should ease work to wipe out more cs_main locks from wallet code.
I think it's ready for a first round of review before to get further.
- `BlockUntilSyncedToCurrent` : restrain isPotentialTip to isTip because we want to be sure that wallet see BlockDisconnected callbacks if its height differs from the Chain one. It means during a reorg, an RPC could return before the BlockDisconnected callback had been triggered. This could cause a tx that had been included in the disconnected block to be displayed as confirmed, for example.
~~- `AbandonTransaction` : in case of conflicted tx (nIndex = -1), we set its m_block_height to the one of conflicting blocks, but if this height is superior to CWallet::m_last_block_processed_height, that means tx isn't conflicted anymore so we return 0 as tx is again unconfirmed~~ After #16624, we instead rely on Confirmation.
~~- `AddToWalletIfInvolvingMe`: in case of block disconnected, transactions are added to mempool again, so we need to replace old txn in `mapWallet` with a height set to zero so we remove check on block_hash.IsNull~~ Already done in #16624
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
@jkczyz you've ACKed an intermediate commit (github annoyingly orders commits in date order, not commit order). Did you mean to ACK the final commit in this branch (36b68de5b2).
jkczyz:
> @jkczyz you've ACKed an intermediate commit (github annoyingly orders commits in date order, not commit order). Did you mean to ACK the final commit in this branch ([36b68de](36b68de5b2)).
meshcollider:
utACK 36b68de5b2
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 36b68de5b2. Changes since last review: new jkczyz refactor importprunedfunds commit, changed BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChainChanges commit title and description, changed Confirmation struct field order and line-wrapped comment
jnewbery:
utACK 36b68de5b2
promag:
Code review ACK 36b68de5b2.
Tree-SHA512: 08b89a0bcc39f67c82a6cb6aee195e6a11697770c788ba737b90986b4893f44e90d1ab9ef87239ea3766508b7e24ea882b7199df41173ab27a3d000328c14644
