Rather than 3 different messages that are confusing / leak
implementation details, use a single message, that is similar to other
wallet related messages. i.e:
"Compiled without sqlite support (required for descriptor wallets)".
88d4d5ff2f rpc: add help for enumeratesigners and walletdisplayaddress (Sjors Provoost)
b0db187e5b ci: use --enable-external-signer instead of --with-boost-process (Sjors Provoost)
b54b2e7b1a Move external signer out of wallet module (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
In addition, this PR enables external signer testing on CI.
This PR moves the ExternalSigner class and RPC methods out of the wallet module.
The `enumeratesigners` RPC can be used without a wallet since #21417. With additional modifications external signers could be used without a wallet in general, e.g. via `signrawtransaction`.
The `signerdisplayaddress` RPC is ranamed to `walletdisplayaddress` because it requires wallet context. A future `displayaddress` RPC call without wallet context could take a descriptor argument.
This commit fixes a `rpc_help.py` failure when configured with `--disable-wallet`.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 88d4d5ff2f
fanquake:
ACK 88d4d5ff2f
Tree-SHA512: 3242a24e22313aed97eee32a520bfcb1c17495ba32a2b8e06a5e151e2611320e2da5ef35b572d84623af0a49a210d2f9377a2531250868d1a0ccf3e144352a97
1c1467f51b i2p: cancel the Accept() method if waiting on the socket errors (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
If `Sock::Wait()` fails, then cancel the `Accept()` method.
Not checking the return value may cause an uninitialized read a few lines below when we read the `occurred` variable.
[Spotted](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21630#issuecomment-814765659) by MarcoFalke, thanks!
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 1c1467f51b
practicalswift:
cr ACK 1c1467f51b: patch looks correct and agree with laanwj that `[[nodiscard]]` can be taken in a follow-up PR :)
Tree-SHA512: 57fa8a03a4e055999e23121cd9ed1566a585ece0cf68b74223d8c902804cb6890218c9356d60e0560ccacc6c8542a526356c226ebd48e7b299b4572be312d49b
725d7ae049 Use PrecomputedTransactionData in signet check (Pieter Wuille)
497718b467 Treat amount<0 also as missing data for P2WPKH/P2WSH (Pieter Wuille)
3820090bd6 Make all SignatureChecker explicit about missing data (Pieter Wuille)
b77b0cc507 Add MissingDataBehavior and make TransactionSignatureChecker handle it (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Currently we have 2 levels of potentially-missing data in the transaction signature hashes:
* P2WPKH/P2WSH hashes need the spent amount
* P2TR hashes need all spent outputs (amount + scriptPubKey)
Missing amounts are treated as -1 (thus leading to unexpected signature failures), while missing outputs in P2TR validation cause assertion failure. This is hard to extend for signing support, and also quite ugly in general.
In this PR, an explicit configuration option to {Mutable,}TransactionSignatureChecker is added (MissingDataBehavior enum class) to either select ASSERT_FAIL or FAIL. Validation code passes ASSERT_FAIL (as at validation time all data should always be passed, and anything else is a serious bug in the code), while signing code uses FAIL.
The existence of the ASSERT_FAIL option is really just an abundance of caution. Always using FAIL should be just fine, but if there were for some reason a code path in consensus code was introduced that misses certain data, I think we prefer as assertion failure over silently introducing a consensus change.
Potentially useful follow-ups (not for this PR, in my preference):
* Having an explicit script validation error code for missing data.
* Having a MissingDataBehavior::SUCCEED option as well, for use in script/sign.cpp DataFromTransaction (if a signature is present in a witness, and we don't have enough data to fully validate it, we should probably treat it as valid and not touch it).
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
reACK 725d7ae049
Sjors:
ACK 725d7ae049
achow101:
re-ACK 725d7ae049
benthecarman:
ACK 725d7ae049
fjahr:
Code review ACK 725d7ae049
Tree-SHA512: d67dc51bae9ca7ef6eb9acccefd682529f397830f77d74cd305500a081ef55aede0e9fa380648c3a8dd4857aa7eeb1ab54fe808979d79db0784ac94ceb31b657
Since we want tests to run quickly, and since tests do a lot more db
operations than expected we expect to see in actual usage, we disable
sqlite's syncing behavior to make db operations run much faster. This
syncing behavior is necessary for normal operation as it helps guarantee
that data won't become lost or corrupted, but in tests, we don't care
about that.
This removes the DEFINED->FAILED transition and changes the
STARTED->FAILED transition to only occur if signalling didn't pass the
threshold. This ensures that it is always possible for activation to
occur, no matter what settings are chosen, or the speed at which blocks
are found.
Previously we used deployments that would timeout prior to Bitcoin's
invention, which allowed the deployment to still be activated in unit
tests. This switches those deployments to be truly never active.
This generalises the ComputeBlockVersion test so that it can apply to
any activation parameters we might set, and checks all the parameters
set for each deployment on each chain, to simultaneously ensure that the
deployments we have configured work sensibly, and that the test code
does not suffer bitrot in the event that all interesting deployments
are buried.
The intent here is to allow checking ComputeBlockVersion behaviour with
each deployment, rather than only testdummy on mainnet. This commit does
the trivial refactoring component of that change.
d3b0b08b0f doc: release notes for new listbanned fields (Jarol Rodriguez)
60290d3f5e test: increase listbanned unit test coverage (Jon Atack)
3e978d1a5d rpc: add time_remaining field to listbanned (Jarol Rodriguez)
5456b34531 rpc: add ban_duration field to listbanned (Jarol Rodriguez)
c95c61657a doc: improve listbanned help (Jarol Rodriguez)
dd3c8eaa33 rpc: swap position of banned_until and ban_created fields (Jarol Rodriguez)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a `ban_duration` and `time_remaining` field to the `listbanned` RPC command. Thanks to jonatack, this PR also expands the `listbanned` test coverage to include these new fields
It's useful to keep track of `ban_duration` as this is another data point on which to sort banned peers. I found this helpful in adding additional context columns to the GUI `bantablemodel` as part of a follow-up PR. As [suggested](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21602#issuecomment-813486134) by jonatack, `time_remaining` is another useful user-centric data point.
Since a ban always expires after its created, the `ban_created` field is now placed before the `banned_until` field. This new ordering is more logical.
This PR also improves the `help listbanned` output by providing additional context to the descriptions of the `address`, `ban_created`, and `banned_until` fields.
**Master: listbanned**
```
[
{
"address": "1.2.3.4/32",
"banned_until": 1617691101,
"ban_created": 1617604701
},
{
"address": "135.181.41.129/32",
"banned_until": 1649140716,
"ban_created": 1617604716
}
]
```
**PR: listbanned**
```
[
{
"address": "1.2.3.4/32",
"ban_created": 1617775773,
"banned_until": 1617862173,
"ban_duration": 86400,
"time_remaining": 86392
},
{
"address": "3.114.211.172/32",
"ban_created": 1617753165,
"banned_until": 1618357965,
"ban_duration": 604800,
"time_remaining": 582184
}
]
```
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK d3b0b08b0f
hebasto:
ACK d3b0b08b0f, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64).
MarcoFalke:
review ACK d3b0b08b0f🕙
Tree-SHA512: 5b83ed2483344e546d57e43adc8a1ed7a1fff292124b14c86ca3a1aa2aec8b0f7198212fabff2c5145e7f726ca04ae567fe667b141254c7519df290cf63774e5
faaf3954e2 fuzz: Extend psbt fuzz target a bit (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Previously it only merged the psbt with itself, now it tries to merge another.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
Tested ACK faaf3954e2
Tree-SHA512: e1b1d31a47d35e1767285bc2fda176c79cb0550d6d383fe467104272e61e1c83f6cbc0c7d6bbc0c3027729eec13ae1f289f8950117ee91e0fb3703e66d5e6918
fa6183d776 test: Remove option to make TestChain100Setup non-deterministic (MarcoFalke)
fa732bccb3 test: Use compressed keys in TestChain100Setup (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Seems odd to have an option for non-deterministic tests
when the goal should be for all tests to be deterministic.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK fa6183d776
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa6183d776: patch looks deterministic!
Tree-SHA512: 6897a9f36e0dfb7d63b25dd6984414b3ee8a62458ad232cb21ed5077184fdb0bc626996e4ac84ef0bdd452b9f17c54aac75a71575b8e723b84cac07c9f9d5611
867a5e172a guix: Register garbage collector root for containers (Carl Dong)
8f8b96fb54 guix: Update hint messages to mention guix-clean (Carl Dong)
44f6d4f56b guix: Record precious directories and add guix-clean (Carl Dong)
84912d4b24 build: Remove spaces from variable-printing rules (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
```
guix: Record precious directories and add guix-clean
Many users have reported problems that stem from having an unclean
working tree. To that end, I've written a guix-clean script which should
help reset the working tree while respecting user-specified precious
directories.
Precious directories, such as:
- SOURCES_PATH
- BASE_CACHE
- SDK_PATH
- OUTDIR
Should be preserved when cleaning the working tree, and are thus
recorded in ./contrib/guix/var/precious_dirs.
The ./contrib/guix/guix-clean script is able to parse that file and make
sure to avoid them when cleaning out the working tree.
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 867a5e172a
Tree-SHA512: c498fad781ff5e6406639df2b91b687fc528273fdf266bcdba8f6eec3b3b37ecce544b6da0252f0b9c6717f9d88e844e4c7b72d1877bdbabfc6871ddd0172af5
This commit moves the ExternalSigner class and RPC methods out of the wallet module.
The enumeratesigners RPC can be used without a wallet since #21417.
With additional modifications external signers could be used without a wallet in general, e.g. via signrawtransaction.
The signerdisplayaddress RPC is ranamed to walletdisplayaddress because it requires wallet context.
A future displayaddress RPC call without wallet context could take a descriptor argument.
This commit fixes a rpc_help.py failure when configured with --disable-wallet.
9044522ef7 Drop JSONRPCRequest constructors after #21366 (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This just makes an additional simplification after #21366 replaced
util::Ref with std::any. It was originally suggested
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21366#issuecomment-792044351 but
delayed for a followup. It would have prevented usage bug
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21572.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK 9044522ef7, fixed conflict in src/wallet/interfaces.cpp.
Tree-SHA512: e909411b8f75013620b94e1a609296befb832fdcb574cd2e6689bfe3c636b03cd4ac1ccb2b32b532daf0f2131bb043464024966310fffc7e3cad77713d4bd0ef
Seems odd to have an option for non-deterministic tests
when the goal should be for all tests to be deterministic.
Can be reviewed with `--ignore-all-space`.
There is no way to iterate through all script verification flags, and
it's not guaranteed that every power of 2 is used. Just make sure that
all flags in STANDARD_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS are present in mapFlagNames;
this covers all consensus and policy flags. If mapFlagNames has more
flags than STANDARD_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS, that's okay. Nonexistent flags
will be caught by the compiler.
Similar to 19db590d04, which removed these
for the valid tests. Not removing ones that cause a false/empty stack
error because these tests should fail due to being invalid with CSV/CLTV
Add missing script verify flags to mapFlagNames.
iterate through mapFlagNames values instead of bits.
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE better reports which test failed exactly, whereas
BOOST_ERROR was just incrementing the error counter.
5c446784b1 rpc: improve getnodeaddresses help (Jon Atack)
1b9189866a rpc: simplify/constify getnodeaddresses code (Jon Atack)
3bb6e7b655 rpc: add network field to rpc getnodeaddresses (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This patch adds a network field to RPC `getnodeaddresses`, which is useful on its own, particularly with the addition of new networks like I2P and others in the future, and which I also found helpful for adding a new CLI command as a follow-up to this pull that calls `getnodeaddresses` and needs to know the network of each address.
While here, also improve the `getnodeaddresses` code and help.
```
$ bitcoin-cli -signet getnodeaddresses 3
[
{
"time": 1611564659,
"services": 1033,
"address": "2600:1702:3c30:734f:8f2e:744b:2a51:dfa5",
"port": 38333,
"network": "ipv6"
},
{
"time": 1617531931,
"services": 1033,
"address": "153.126.143.201",
"port": 38333,
"network": "ipv4"
},
{
"time": 1617473058,
"services": 1033,
"address": "nsgyo7begau4yecc46ljfecaykyzszcseapxmtu6adrfagfrrzrlngyd.onion",
"port": 38333,
"network": "onion"
}
]
$ bitcoin-cli help getnodeaddresses
getnodeaddresses ( count )
Return known addresses, which can potentially be used to find new nodes in the network.
Arguments:
1. count (numeric, optional, default=1) The maximum number of addresses to return. Specify 0 to return all known addresses.
Result:
[ (json array)
{ (json object)
"time" : xxx, (numeric) The UNIX epoch time when the node was last seen
"services" : n, (numeric) The services offered by the node
"address" : "str", (string) The address of the node
"port" : n, (numeric) The port number of the node
"network" : "str" (string) The network (ipv4, ipv6, onion, i2p) the node connected through
},
...
]
```
Future idea: allow passing `getnodeaddresses` a network (or networks) as an argument to return only addresses in that network.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Tested ACK 5c446784b1
jarolrod:
re-ACK 5c446784b1
promag:
Code review ACK 5c446784b1.
Tree-SHA512: ab0101f50c76d98c3204133b9f2ab6b7b17193ada31455ef706ad11afbf48f472fa3deb33e96028682369b35710ccd07d81863d2fd55c1485f32432f2b75efa8
937fd4a66f Fix wrong wallet RPC context set after #21366 (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This bug doesn't have any effects currently because it only affects
external signer RPCs which aren't currently using the wallet context,
but it does cause an appveyor failure in a upcoming PR:
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/DrahtBot/bitcoin/builds/38512882
This bug is subtle and could have been avoided if JSONRPCRequest didn't
have constructors that were so loose with type checking. Suggested
change
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21366#issuecomment-792044351
eliminates these and would be a good followup for a future PR.
This PR just implements the simplest possible fix.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code-review ACK 937fd4a66f
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 937fd4a66f
Tree-SHA512: 53e6265ed6c7abb47d2b3e77d1604edfeb993c3a2440f0c19679cfeb23516965e6707ff486196a0acfbeff21c79a9a08b5cd33bae9a232d33d0134bca1bd0ff3
