fa93ef5a8a refactor: Take Span in SetSeed (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This makes calling code less verbose and less fragile. Also, by adding
the CKey::data() member function, it is now possible to call HexStr()
with a CKey object.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK fa93ef5a8a
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa93ef5a8a
theStack:
Code-review ACK fa93ef5a8a
Tree-SHA512: 73fb999320719ad4b9ab5544018a7a083d140545c2807ee3582ecf7f441040a30b5157e85790b6b840af82f002a7faf30bd8162ebba5caaf2067391c43dc7e25
095f07744c ci: Do not print `git log` for empty COMMIT_RANGE (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On master (77a2f5d30c) a CI lint task [log](https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/task/4817858858319872/logs/lint.log) exceeds 20K lines.
This PR fixes this issue.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 095f07744c
Tree-SHA512: 89180018aeccf1599cdf218924cbab12dcbae0f6674bb90e13b64e342cdd908a880b885039c23f0d1d03493e55a94fe04abf39481616ae6550c6a759f5ca9a35
a04350b86c Open streams_test_tmp file in temporary folder (Martin Leitner-Ankerl)
Pull request description:
The tests `streams_tests/streams_buffered_file` and `streams_tests/streams_buffered_file_rand`
did not use a the temporary directory provided by `BasicTestingSetup`, so it was not possible
to execute multiple of them in parallel. This fixes that.
To reproduce, run
```sh
parallel --halt now,fail=1 './src/test/test_bitcoin --run_test=streams_tests/streams_buffered_file_rand' -- ::: {1..1000}
```
This executes the test 1000 times, one job per CPU. It works on that commit but mergebase fails quickly.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Tested ACK a04350b86c
Tree-SHA512: 705b127e99a0fdbf33362283cc94036ac3aeff364a5e75b0f0a2490114bbaa44cf310ac13d43c254a4b51b72d4e856e9ee584904ce56b2f496b92d995ac7dc24
15fb57556e ci: Enable ccache for "ARM64 Android APK" job (Hennadii Stepanov)
7a777ec98c build: Fix `make apk` if ccache enabled (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On master (456c8d6cd8) `make apk` is broken for Android targets if the build system was configured with `--enable-ccache` explicitly or by default.
This PR fixes this bug, and enables `ccache` for "ARM64 Android APK" Cirrus CI job.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 15fb57556e
Tree-SHA512: e3c94dccc9f07a712e0e01983462ee607122623b213173c74d17e91024243239de212a35e5db94036bfd0a347e727b133865c26c67d6bd279604416ea971ab94
78e36700a0 doc: remove mention of system univalue (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Should have been part of #22646.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 78e36700a0
Tree-SHA512: a5d54d73526033825ce4467cc3c57c26064739eef546556975a4c6f1f5bea84004640acd426734f90f98bc7a76ec837d716aa31167f2bdce7ee3887ad92e3152
7eb5b25e6e doc: Mention that BerkeleyDB is for legacy wallet in build-unix (W. J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
This updates build-unix for the descriptor wallet, and prepares for eventual legacy wallet deprecation.
- Move 'descriptor wallet' dependencies above legacy wallet deps both for Debian and Fedora.
- Explicitly mention 'legacy wallet' where referring to the BerkeleyDB wallet. Shorten BerkeleyDB instruction to a single paragraph.
ACKs for top commit:
lsilva01:
ACK 7eb5b25
hebasto:
ACK 7eb5b25e6e, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 8a0859bfaf170a1c5a8b3e8f873d6b788f3b1cebd8d006569348c5b415d5ebbdfd56a5a294c509114975addb599da8a50c4be618b0545ff402065e948f692ba1
bb1c84082c Remove the build_msvc/testconsensus project (Aaron Clauson)
Pull request description:
The testconsensus project is not integral to the Bitcoin Core code. It was originally added as a quick and dirty demo of how to do a consensus check with the msvc build. There are better examples.
PR #23438 made a change that caused a compiler error with the buildmsvc/testconsensus code. Rather than leave it hanging around to incur potential bitrot, or further PR build failures, it should be removed.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK bb1c84082c, tested on Windows 10 Pro (20H2).
Tree-SHA512: d81b99eb09171b66c179961b15f0b2e2e97e5ee7f011f18667e890c90e3d169593ad9aedd05a8616e962212952048827b7159d3c2a2ecb7ac378136b80bf6b23
The testconsensus project is not integral to the Bitcoin Core code. It was originally added as a quick and dirty demo of how to do a consensus check with the msvc build. There are better examples.
PR #23438 made a change that caused a compiler error with the buildmsvc/testconsensus code. Rather than leave it hanging around to incur potential bitrot, or furhter PR build failures, it should be removed.
This updates build-unix for the descriptor wallet, and prepares for
eventual legacy wallet deprecation.
- Move 'descriptor wallet' dependencies above legacy wallet deps both
for Debian and Fedora.
- Explicitly mention 'legacy wallet' where referring to the BerkeleyDB
wallet. Shorten BerkeleyDB instruction to a single paragraph.
11115169a1 ci: Build fuzz with libsqlite3-dev (MarcoFalke)
fa7c6efca6 fuzz: Add wallet fuzz test (MarcoFalke)
fa59d2ce5b refactor: Use local args instead of global gArgs in CWallet::Create (MarcoFalke)
fadb44606f build: Inline FUZZ_SUITE_LDFLAGS_COMMON (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Initial sketch to fuzz descriptor wallets. Can be improved in the future.
ACKs for top commit:
mjdietzx:
Code review ACK 1111516
Tree-SHA512: b1d2f24504d1ed5f3c6a031210f04c27c13d4e15576c4acbf50ded37ac45f7b7a5c7553e91d81d4a06e9ea73b3d745a552218d3ef3b2932fa5325a8331b0d3fd
Makes the test more minimal. We're just trying to test that our package
sanitization logic is correct. Now that this code lives in its own
function (rather than inside of AcceptMultipleTransactions), there's no
need to call ProcessNewPackage to test this.
No change in behavior, because package transactions would not be going
through the rbf logic in PreChecks anyway (BIP125 is currently disabled
for package acceptance, see ATMPArgs).
We draw the line here because each individual transaction in package
validation still goes through all PreChecks. For example, checking that
one's own conflicts and dependencies are disjoint (a consensus check)
and individual transaction mempool ancestor/descendant limits.
The aliases are leftover from a previous MOVEONLY refactor - they are
unnecessary and removing them reduces the diff for splitting out mempool
Checks from PreChecks, making RBF variables MemPoolAccept-wide, etc.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
unalias() { sed -i "s:\<$1\>:$2:g" src/validation.cpp; sed -i "/$2 = $2/d" src/validation.cpp; }
unalias nModifiedFees ws.m_modified_fees
unalias nConflictingFees ws.m_conflicting_fees
unalias nConflictingSize ws.m_conflicting_size
unalias setConflicts ws.m_conflicts
unalias allConflicting ws.m_all_conflicting
unalias setAncestors ws.m_ancestors
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
The tests `streams_tests/streams_buffered_file` and `streams_tests/streams_buffered_file_rand`
did not use a the temporary directory provided by `BasicTestingSetup`, so it was not possible
to execute multiple of them in parallel. This fixes that.
To reproduce, run
```sh
parallel --halt now,fail=1 './src/test/test_bitcoin --run_test=streams_tests/streams_buffered_file_rand' -- ::: {1..1000}
```
This executes the test 1000 times, one job per CPU. It works on that commit but mergebase fails quickly.
80dc829be7 tests: Calculate fees more similarly to CFeeRate::GetFee (Andrew Chow)
ce2cc44afd tests: Test for assertion when feerate is rounded down (Andrew Chow)
0fbaef9676 fees: Always round up fee calculated from a feerate (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When calculating the fee for a feerate, it is possible that the final calculation will have fractional satoshis. Currently those are ignored via truncation which results in the absolute fee being rounded down. Rounding down is problematic because it results in a feerate that is slightly lower than the feerate represented by the `CFeeRate` object. A slightly lower feerate particularly causes issues for coin selection as it can trigger an assertion error. To avoid potentially underpaying the feerate (and the assertion), always round up the calculated fee.
A test is added for the assertion, along with a comment explaining what happens.
It is unlikely that a user can trigger this as it requires a very specific set of rounding errors to occur as well as the transaction not needing any change and being right on the lower bound of the exact match window. However I was able to trigger the assertion while running coin selection simulations, albeit after thousands of transactions and with some weird feerates.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 80dc829be7
promag:
Tested ACK 80dc829be7.
lsilva01:
tACK 80dc829
meshcollider:
utACK 80dc829be7
Tree-SHA512: fe26684c60f236cab48ea6a4600c141ce766dbe59504ec77595dcbd7fd0b34559acc617007f4f499c9155d8fda0a336954413410ba862b19c765c0cfac79d642
CTxMemPool::check() will carry out internal consistency checks 1/n times,
where n is set by the `-checkmempool` configuration option. By default,
mempool consistency checks are disabled entirely on mainnet.
Therefore, this change has no effect on mainnet nodes running with
default configuration. It simply removes the responsibility to trigger
mempool consistency checks from net_processing.
This just calls through to AcceptToMemoryPool() internally, and is currently unused.
Also add a new transaction validation failure reason TX_NO_MEMPOOL to
indicate that there is no mempool.
User-facing error messages should not leak internal implementation
details like function names. Update the MEMPOOL_REJECTED error string
from "Transaction rejected by AcceptToMemoryPool" to the more generic
"Transaction rejected by mempool". Also update the MEMPOOL_ERROR error
message from "AcceptToMemoryPool failed" to the more precise "Mempool
internal error" since this error indicates and internal (e.g.
logic/hardware/etc) failure, and not a transaction rejection.
"This logic is not necessary for memory pool transactions, as
AcceptToMemoryPool already refuses previously-known transaction ids
entirely." refers to the logic at
a206b0ea12/src/main.cpp (L484-L486),
which was later removed in commit 450cbb0944.
An IPv6 address from fc00::/8 could be either from the CJDNS network or
from a private-unroutable-reserved segment of IPv6. A seed node with
such an address must be from the CJDNS network, otherwise other peers
will not be able to connect to it.
CJDNS addresses start with constant 8 bits, so in order to account for
the first 4 random ones, we must take the first 12. Otherwise the entire
CJDNS network will belong to one group.
The default bool argument makes it harder to read because the last but
one argument is also bool. Pass all of them as named arguments to
increase readability.
Another bool argument will be added to indicate whether to test CJDNS.
Co-authored-by: Jon Atack <jon@atack.com>
In some cases addresses come from an external source as a string or as a
`struct sockaddr_in6`, without a tag to tell whether it is a private
IPv6 or a CJDNS address. In those cases interpret the address as a CJDNS
address instead of an IPv6 address if `-cjdnsreachable` is set and the
seemingly-IPv6-address belongs to `fc00::/8`. Those external sources are:
* `-externalip=`
* `-bind=`
* UPnP
* `getifaddrs(3)` (called through `-discover`)
* `addnode`
* `connect`
* incoming connections (returned by `accept(2)`)
CJDNS is set up in the host OS, outside of the application. When the
routing is configured properly then connecting to fc00::/8 results in
connecting to the CJDNS network.
Introduce an option so that Bitcoin Core knows whether this is the case.
Connecting to CJDNS addresses works without a proxy, just like
connecting to an IPv6 address. Thus adapt `CService::GetSockAddr()` to
retrieve the `struct sockaddr*` even for `CService::IsCJDNS()` objects.
AcceptToMemoryPool() is called for an invalid coinbase transaction, so
setting bypass_limits to true or false has no impact on the test.
The only way that changing bypass_limits from true to false could change
the result would be to change the outcome to INVALID(TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY).
Since the ATMP call in this test results in INVALID(TX_CONSENSUS) both
before and after this change, there is no change in behavior.
AcceptToMemoryPool() is called for transactions with fees above
minRelayTxFee and with the mempool not full, so setting bypass_limits to
true or false has no impact on the test.
The only way that changing bypass_limits from true to false could change
the result would be to change the outcome to INVALID(TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY).
Since all the ATMP calls in this test result in VALID both before and
after this change, there is no change in behavior.
